Tumour morphology as a predictor of outcome after local excision of rectal cancer

The impact of transanal local excision of early rectal cancer on completion rectal resection without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The impact of transanal local excision (TAE) of early rectal cancer (ERC) on subsequent completion rectal resection (CRR) for unfavorable histology or margin involvement is unclear. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of the literature on the impact of TAE on CRR in patients without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature up to March 2020. Medline and Cochrane libraries were searched for studies reporting outcomes of CRR after TAE for ERC. We excluded patients who had neoadjuvant CRT and endoscopic local excision. Surgical, functional, pathological and oncological outcomes were assessed. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies involving 353 patients were included. Pathology following TAE was as follows T0 = 2 (0.5%); T1 = 154 (44.7%); T2 = 142 (41.2%); T3 = 43 (12.5%); Tx = 3 (0.8%); T not reported = 9. Fifty-three percent were > T1. Abdominoperineal resection (APR) was performed in 80 (23.2%) patients. Postoperative major morbidity and mortality occurred in 22 (11.4%) and 3 (1.1%), patients, respectively. An incomplete mesorectal fascia resulting in defects of the mesorectum was reported in 30 (24.6%) cases. Thirteen (12%) patients developed recurrence: 8 (3.1%) local, 19 (7.3%) distant, 4 (1.5%) local and distant. The 5-year cancer-specific survival was 92%. Only 1 study assessed anal function reporting no continence disorders in 11 patients. In the meta-analysis, CRR after TAE showed an increased APR rate (OR 5.25; 95% CI 1.27-21.8; p 0.020) and incomplete mesorectum rate (OR 3.48; 95% CI 1.32-9.19; p 0.010) compared to primary total mesorectal excision (TME). Two case matched studies reported no difference in recurrence rate and disease free survival respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The data are incomplete and of low quality. There was a tendency towards an increased risk of APR and poor specimen quality. It is necessary to improve the accuracy of preoperative staging of malignant rectal tumors in patients scheduled for TAE.

Clinicopathologic Features of Submucosal Papillary Gastric Cancer Differ from Those of Other Differentiated-Type Histologies

Background/Aims

Papillary gastric cancer (GC) is classified as differentiated adenocarcinoma, together with well-differentiated (WD) and moderately differentiated (MD) adenocarcinoma. This study evaluated the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in submucosal (SM) invasive papillary GC compared with other differentiated early GC types.

Methods

This retrospective study involved three tertiary hospitals and enrolled 1,798 lesions with differentiated SM invasive GC treated with curative gastrectomy between March 2001 and December 2012. All pathology slides were reviewed, and clinicopathologic findings associated with LNM, including tumor size, location, gross type, ulceration, depth and width of SM invasion, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI), were analyzed.

Results

The proportion of SM papillary GC was 2.8% (n=51). SM papillary GC was associated with larger tumor size and deeper and wider SM invasion than other differentiated GC types. LNM was significantly higher in the papillary type than in the MD and WD types. LNM was found in 27.5% of SM papillary GC patients (WD 9.0%, MD 21.2%). LVI was the only significant risk factor for LNM in SM papillary GC. The depth or width of SM invasion was not associated with LNM in papillary GC. Lower third location or elevated gross appearance was significantly associated with LVI.

Conclusions

SM papillary GC had the highest LNM rate, with features different from those of other differentiated SM invasive GCs. The treatment strategy for SM papillary GC should be carefully approached, especially for lesions located in the lower third or of the elevated gross type.

Preoperative radiotherapy and local excision of rectal cancer: Long-term results of a randomised study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

It is uncertain whether local control is acceptable after preoperative radiotherapy and local excision (LE). An optimal preoperative dose/fractionation schedule has not yet been established.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a phase III study, patients with cT1-2N0M0 or borderline cT2/T3N0M0 < 4 cm rectal adenocarcinomas were randomised to receive either 5 × 5 Gy plus 1 × 4 Gy boost or chemoradiation: 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions plus 3 × 1.8 Gy boost and 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin bolus. LE was performed 6-8 weeks later. Patients with ypT0-1R0 disease were observed. Completion total mesorectal excision (CTME) was recommended for poor responders, i.e. ypT1R1/ypT2-3.

RESULTS

Of 61 randomised patients, 10 were excluded leaving 51 for analysis; 29 in the short-course group and 22 in the chemoradiation group. YpT0-1R0 was observed in 66% of patients in the short-course group and in 86% in the chemoradiation group, p = 0.11. CTME was performed only in 46% of patients with ypT1R1/ypT2-3. The median follow-up was 8.7 years. Local recurrence incidences and overall survival at 10 years were respectively for the short-course group vs. the chemoradiation group 35% vs. 5%, p = 0.036 and 47% vs. 86%, p = 0.009. In total, local recurrence at 10 years was 79% for ypT1R1/T2-3 without CTME.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial suggests that in the LE setting, both local recurrence and survival are worse after short-course radiotherapy than after chemoradiation. Because of the risk of bias, a confirmatory study is desirable. Lack of CTME is associated with an unacceptably high local recurrence rate.

Early-stage rectal cancer: clinical and pathologic prognostic markers of time to local recurrence and overall survival after resection

BACKGROUND

Resection without adjuvant therapy results in a low recurrence rate for patients with stage I (T1/2 N0) rectal cancer in the range of 4% to 16% at 5 years. There are limited data, however, regarding clinical or pathologic prognostic markers for recurrence in this population.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess the clinical and pathologic factors associated with local recurrence and overall survival in patients with early-stage rectal cancer after resection.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at 2 tertiary care centers in Boston, Massachusetts.

PATIENTS

From 2000 to 2008, 175 patients with stage I rectal cancer treated with local or total mesorectal excision without adjuvant therapy were identified.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Time to local recurrence after resection and overall survival were evaluated for all patients with complete follow-up data. Perioperative data were reviewed to identify staging method, preoperative CEA, type of surgery, tumor size, number of lymph nodes resected, histological grade, circumferential resection margin, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor ulceration. Data were analyzed by using a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Of the eligible cohort, 137 patients had complete follow-up data for analysis of time to local recurrence, and only 23 (16.8%) patients had local recurrence. Among these 23 patients, the median time to recurrence was 1.1 years (0.1-7.8). On multivariate analysis, male sex, current alcohol use, and tumor ulceration were associated with heightened risk of local recurrence. Of the original cohort, 173 patients had complete follow-up for overall survival analysis. Among these patients, the median overall survival was 12 years. On multivariable analysis, age at diagnosis >65 years and T2 pathologic stage were associated with decreased survival.

LIMITATIONS

As in any retrospective study, there is a potential for selection bias. Several patients were excluded from the analysis due to inadequate follow-up data. These results from two academic medical centers with specialized colorectal surgeons may not be generally applicable. The relatively small number of events, ie, recurrences, suggest the findings should be validated in a larger study.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with stage I rectal cancer treated with resection alone, these results provide important prognostic information and may help identify those who could benefit from additional therapy.

When is local excision appropriate for "early" rectal cancer?

Local excision is increasingly performed for “early stage” rectal cancer in the US; however, local recurrence after local excision has become a controversial issue in Western countries. Local recurrence is considered to originate based on the type of tumor and procedure performed, and in surgical margin-positive cases. This review focuses on the inclusion criteria of “early” rectal cancers for local excision from the Western and Japanese points of view. “Early” rectal cancer is defined as T1 cancer in the rectum. Only the tumor grade and depth of invasion are the “high risk” factors which can be evaluated before treatment. T1 cancers with sm1 or submucosal invasion <1,000 μm are considered to be “low risk” tumors with less than 3.2 % nodal involvement, and are considered to be candidates for local excision as the sole curative surgery. Tumors with a poor tumor grade should be excluded from local excision. Digital examination, endoscopy or proctoscopy with biopsy, a barium enema study and endorectal ultrasonography are useful for identifying “low risk” or excluding “high risk” factors preoperatively for a comprehensive diagnosis. The selection of an initial local treatment modality is also considered to be important according to the analysis of the nodal involvement rate after initial local treatment and after radical surgery.

Preoperative radiotherapy and local excision of rectal cancer with immediate radical re-operation for poor responders: a prospective multicentre study

PURPOSE

To assess local control after preoperative radiation and local excision and to determine an optimal radiotherapy regimen.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with G1-2 rectal adenocarcinoma <3-4 cm; unfavourable cT1N0 (23.6%), cT2N0 (62.9%) or borderline cT2/cT3N0 (13.5%) received 5 × 5 Gy plus 4 Gy boost (71.9%) or 55.8 Gy in 31 fractions with 5-FU and leucovorin (28.1%). Local excision (traditional technique 56.2%, transanal endoscopic microsurgery 41.6%, Kraske procedure 2.2%) was performed 6-8 weeks later. If patients were downstaged to ypT0-1 without unfavourable factors (good responders), this was deemed definitive treatment. Immediate conversion to radical surgery was recommended for remaining patients.

RESULTS

Good response to radiation was seen in 67.2% of patients in the short-course group and in 80.0% in the chemoradiation group, p = 0.30. Local recurrence at 2 years (median follow-up) in good responders was 11.8% in the short-course group and 6.2% in the chemoradiation group, p = 0.53. In the total group, a lower rate of local recurrence at 2 years was observed in elderly patients (>69 years, median value) when compared to the younger patients; 8.3% vs. 27.7%, Cox analysis hazard ratio 0.232, p = 0.016. A total of 18 patients initially managed with local excision required conversion to abdominal surgery but either refused it or were unfit. In this group, local recurrence at 2 years was 37.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests an acceptable local recurrence rate after preoperative radiotherapy and local excision of small, radiosensitive tumours in elderly patients.

Shifting concepts in rectal cancer management: a review of contemporary primary rectal cancer treatment strategies

The management of rectal cancer has transformed over the last 3 decades and continues to evolve. Some of these changes parallel progress made with other cancers: refinement of surgical technique to improve organ preservation, selective use of neoadjuvant (and adjuvant) therapy, and emergence of criteria suggesting a role for individually tailored therapy. Other changes are driven by fairly unique issues including functional considerations, rectal anatomic features, and surgical technical issues. Further complexity is due to the variety of staging modalities (each with its own limitations), neoadjuvant treatment alternatives, and competing strategies for sequencing multimodal treatment even for nonmetastatic disease. Importantly, observations of tumor response made in the era of neoadjuvant therapy are reshaping some traditionally held concepts about tumor behavior. Frameworks for prioritizing and integrating complex data can help to formulate treatment plans for patients.

Linear array ultrasonography to stage rectal neoplasias suitable for local treatment

BACKGROUND

Because of the many therapeutic options available, a reliable staging is crucial for rectal neoplasia management. Adenomas and cancers limited to the submucosa without lymph node involvement may be treated locally.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in the staging of neoplasias suitable for local treatment.

METHODS

We considered all patients who underwent endorectal ultrasonography between 2001 and 2010. The study population consisted of 92 patients with 92 neoplasias (68 adenocarcinomas and 24 adenomas). A 5 and 7.5MHz linear array echoendoscope was used. The postoperative histopathologic result was compared with the preoperative staging defined by endorectal ultrasonography. Adenomas and cancers limited to the submucosa were considered together (pT0-1).

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy rate, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of endorectal ultrasonography for pT0-1 were 86%, 95.6%, 91.3%, 94.9% and 88.7%. Those for nodal involvement were 45.4%, 95.5%, 83%, 76.9% and 84%, with 3 false positive results and 12 false negative. For combined pT0-1 and pN0, endorectal ultrasonography showed an 87.5% sensitivity, 95.9% specificity, 92% overall accuracy rate, 94.9% positive predictive value and 90.2% negative predictive value.

CONCLUSION

Endorectal linear array ultrasonography is a reliable tool to detect rectal neoplasias suitable for local treatment.

Rectal cancer

Surgery is the cornerstone of rectal cancer treatment. Oncological cure and overall survival continue to be the main goals, but sparing of the anal sphincter mechanism and functional results are also important. The modern management of rectal cancer is a multidisciplinary approach, and pre-operative staging is of crucial importance when planning treatment in these patients. Pre-operative staging is used to determine the indication for neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection or to determine whether local excision is an option in carefully selected patients with early rectal cancer. Surgery in the form of total mesorectal excision (TME) has become the standard of care for mid and distal rectal cancers. Early rectal cancers do not require neoadjuvant therapy. For locally advanced cancers of the lower two-thirds of the rectum, the combination of surgical resection with chemoradiotherapy decreases local recurrence rates and probably improves overall survival. Whereas in the past local excision was only contemplated in patients who were unfit for radical surgery or for local palliation in cases of metastatic disease, over the last number of years there has been increasing interest in local treatment with curative intent in early rectal cancer.

Preoperative radiotherapy and local excision of rectal cancer with immediate radical re-operation for poor responders

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To report an early analysis of prospective study exploring preoperative radiotherapy and local excision in rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mucosa at tumour edges was tattooed. Patients with cT1-3N0 tumour <3-4 cm were treated with either 5x5Gy+4Gy boost (N=31) or chemoradiation (50.4Gy+5.4Gy boost, 1.8Gy per fraction+5-fluorouracyl and leucovorin; N=13). Thirteen patients from the short-course group were unfit for chemotherapy. The interval from radiation to full-thickness local excision was 6 weeks. The protocol called for conversion to a transabdominal surgery in case of ypT2-3 disease or positive margin.

RESULTS

The postoperative complications requiring hospitalization were recorded in 9% of patients. The rate of pathological complete response was 41%. The rate of patients requiring conversion was 34%; however, 18% actually underwent conversion and the remaining 16% refused or were unfit. During the 14 months of median follow-up, local recurrence was detected in 7% of patients and all underwent salvage surgery. Of 19 patients in whom initially anterior resection was likely, 16% had abdominoperineal resection performed for a conversion or as a rescue procedure.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the short-course radiation prior to local excision is a treatment option for high-risk patients.

Local excision for rectal carcinoma

Local excision is an alternative approach to radical proctectomy for rectal cancer, but from an oncologic standpoint, it is a compromise, and its role remains controversial. Careful patient selection is essential because local excision is generally considered only for early rectal cancer with no evidence of nodal metastasis, parameters that can be predicted by clinical examination, and various radiologic modalities with variable accuracy. In this review, we present the literature evaluating the oncologic adequacy of local excision, including transanal endoscopic microsurgery and the results of salvage surgery after local excision. An overview of local excision in the context of perioperative adjuvant therapies is included. Finally, we suggest a treatment algorithm for local excision in rectal cancer.

Local management of rectal neoplasia

The treatment of rectal neoplasia, whether benign or malignant, challenges the surgeon. The challenge in treating rectal cancer is selecting the proper approach for the appropriate patient. In a small number of rectal cancer patients local excision may be the best approach. In an attempt to achieve two goals-cure of disease with a low rate of local failure and maintenance of function and quality of life-multiple approaches can be utilized. The key to obtaining a good outcome for any one patient is balancing the competing factors that impact on these goals. Any effective treatment aimed at controlling rectal cancer in the pelvis must take into account the disease in the bowel wall itself and the disease, or potential disease, in the mesorectum. The major downside of local excision techniques is the potential of leaving untreated disease in the mesorectum. Local management techniques avoid the potential morbidity, mortality, and functional consequences of a major abdominal radical resection and are thus quite effective in achieving the maintenance of function and quality of life goal. The issue for the transanal techniques is how they fare in achieving the first goal-cure of the cancer while keeping local recurrence rates to an absolute minimum. Without removing both the rectum and the mesorectum there is no completely accurate way to determine whether a rectal cancer has moved outside the bowel wall, so any decision on local management of a rectal neoplasm is a calculated risk. For benign neoplasia, the challenge is removing the lesion without having to resort to a major abdominal procedure.

Management of early rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Early rectal cancer (ERC) is adenocarcinoma that has invaded into, but not extended beyond, the submucosa of the rectum (that is a T1 tumour). Local excision is curative for low-risk ERCs but for high-risk cancers such management is controversial.

METHODS

This review is based on published literature obtained by searching the PubMed and Cochrane databases, and the bibliographies of extracted articles.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

ERC presents as a focus of malignancy within an adenoma, as a polyp, or as a small ulcerating adenocarcinoma. Preoperative staging relies on endorectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Pathological staging uses the Haggitt and Kikuchi classifications for adenocarcinoma in pedunculated and sessile polyps respectively. Lymph node metastases increase with the Kikuchi level, with a 1-3 per cent risk for submucosal layer (Sm) 1, 8 per cent for Sm2 and 23 per cent for Sm3 lesions. Low-risk ERCs may be treated endoscopically or by a transanal procedure. Transanal excision or transanal endoscopic microsurgery may be inadequate for high-risk ERCs and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may be appropriate. There is a low rate of recurrence after local surgery for low-risk ERCs but this increases to up to 29 per cent for high-risk cancers.

Can depth of tumour invasion predict lymph node positivity in patients undergoing resection for early rectal cancer? A comparative study between T1 and T2 cancers

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated the risk of lymph node metastasis according to the depth of tumour invasion in patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer.

METHOD

The histology of patients undergoing oncological resection with regional lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer at St Marks Hospital from 1971 to 1996 was reviewed. Of the total number of 1549 patients, 303 patients with T(1) or T(2) rectal cancers were selected. The tumour type, grade, evidence of vascular invasion, depth of submucosal invasion (classed into 'sm1-3') were evaluated as potential predictors of lymph node positivity using univariate and multi-level logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Tumour stage was classified as T(1) in 55 (18.2%) and T(2) in 248 (81.2%) patients. The incidence of lymph node metastasis in the T(1) group was 12.7% (7/55), compared to 19% (47/247) in the T(2) group. The node positive and negative groups were similar with regard to patient demographics, although the former contained a significantly higher number of poorly differentiated (P = 0.001) and extramural vascular invasion tumours (P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the number of patients with sm1-3, or T(2) tumour depths within the lymph node positive and negative groups. On multivariate analysis the presence of extramural vascular invasion (odds ratio = 10.0) and tumour grade (odds ratio for poorly vs well-differentiated = 11.7) were independent predictors of lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Whilst the degree of vascular invasion and poor differentiation of rectal tumours were significant risk factors for lymph node metastasis, depth of submucosal invasion was not. This has important implications for patients with superficial early rectal cancers in whom local excision is being considered.

Local excision after radio(chemo)therapy for rectal cancer: is it safe?

According to current opinion, local excision in rectal cancer should be limited to selected T1N0 tumours. Preoperative radio(chemo)therapy provides an opportunity for expanding the use of local excision for more advanced tumours. The key rationale of this approach is the correlation between the radiosensitivity and inherited low aggressiveness of rectal cancer and the correlation between the radiosensitivity of the primary tumour and the radiosensitivity of mesorectal nodal disease. This allows for a selection of local excision for radiosensitive tumours or conversion to abdominal surgery in radioresistant cases. Eleven reports including a total of 311 patients treated with preoperative radio(chemo)therapy and local excision have been published. In some series, the tumours were initially large and unresectable by the transanal approach. Pathological data suggest that local excision must involve all tissue invaded on pre-treatment examination with a margin, even in patients with a clinical complete response. The pooled analysis has shown a local recurrence rate of 1% (1/83) for patients achieving a pathological complete response, 8% (3/40) for ypT1, 11% (4/37) for ypT2 and 3/9 for ypT3. In conclusion, the results of preoperative radio(chemo)therapy and local excision are encouraging and warrant a population-based, multicentre controlled study.

Local therapy for rectal cancer: still controversial?

PURPOSE

Many considerations, such as morbidity, sexual and urinary dysfunction, or risk of definitive stoma have led to the increased popularity of local therapy in the therapeutic strategy for rectal cancer. However, its role in curative intent is still controversial with oncologic long-term results lower than those obtained by radical surgery.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Abstract books, and reference lists from reviews were searched with English language publications to review the current status of evidence for local therapy in rectal cancer, looking especially at the oncologic results and patient selection. We have focused on the new strategies combining neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment to explain their place in the management of rectal cancer.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The key to potentially curative local treatment for rectal cancer is patient selection by identifying the best candidates with preoperative tumor staging and clinical and pathologic assessment of favorable features. Low-risk T1 is suitable for local excision alone. Limited data suggest that adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may be helpful in patients with unfavorable T1 and T2 lesions, achieving a local recurrence rate<20 percent. However, the efficacy of salvage surgery after local excision is uncertain.

An audit of outcomes in colorectal cancer in China

AIM

This study was designed to analyses the correlation between the extent of lymph node excision and the prognosis of colorectal cancer and to discuss the clinical significance of excision of lymph nodes adjacent to mesenteric artery pedicle.

METHODS

A total of 1409 patients with colorectal cancer who had the primary radical operation in our hospital during 1985 to 2000 was analyzed in this study. They were divided into two groups according to whether undergone an excision of lymph nodes adjacent to mesenteric artery pedicle. There were 857 patients in the excision group and 552 patients in the non-excision group. Comparison of prognoses was based on the follow-up results.

RESULTS

The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates of the excision group were 90%, 81% and 77%, while those of the non-excision group were 91%, 84% and 79%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year tumor-free survival rates of excision group were 90%, 79% and 75%, while those of the non-excision group were 90%, 83% and 76%. Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show any difference in overall survival rate or tumor-free survival rate between these two groups (P>0.05). After follow-up of 12 to 289 months there were 42 cases of local recurrence and 79 cases of metastases in the excision group. In the non-excision group local recurrence occurred in 30 cases and 60 patients had metastases. There was no difference in the rates of local recurrence and metastasis between these two groups. Multivariate correlation analyses showed that the excision of lymph nodes adjacent to mesenteric artery pedicle was not statistically correlated to recurrence, metastasis and survival time after radical operation of colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

In radical operation of colorectal cancer it is not necessary to perform excision of lymph nodes adjacent to mesenteric artery pedicle which is not correlated to prognosis.

Modern management of rectal cancer: A 2006 update

The goal of this review is to outline some of the important surgical issues surrounding the management of patients with early (T1/T2 and N0), as well as locally advanced (T3/T4 and/or N1) rectal cancer. Surgery for rectal cancer continues to develop towards the ultimate goals of improved local control and overall survival, maintaining quality of life, and preserving sphincter, genitourinary, and sexual function. Information concerning the depth of tumor penetration through the rectal wall, lymph node involvement, and presence of distant metastatic disease is of crucial importance when planning a curative rectal cancer resection. Preoperative staging is used to determine the indication for neoadjuvant therapy as well as the indication for local excision versus radical cancer resection. Local excision is likely to be curative in most patients with a primary tumor which is limited to the submucosa (T1N0M0), without high-risk features and in the absence of metastatic disease. In appropriate patients, minimally invasive procedures, such as local excision, TEM, and laparoscopic resection allow for improved patient comfort, shorter hospital stays, and earlier return to preoperative activity level. Once the tumor invades the muscularis propria (T2), radical rectal resection in acceptable operative candidates is recommended. In patients with transmural and/or node positive disease (T3/T4 and/or N1) with no distant metastases, preoperative chemoradiation followed by radical resection according to the principles of TME has become widely accepted. During the planning and conduct of a radical operation for a locally advanced rectal cancer, a number of surgical management issues are considered, including: (1) total mesorectal excision (TME); (2) autonomic nerve preservation (ANP); (3) circumferential resection margin (CRM); (4) distal resection margin; (5) sphincter preservation and options for restoration of bowel continuity; (6) laparoscopic approaches; and (7) postoperative quality of life.

© 2006 The WJG Press. All rights reserved.

Lymphovascular invasion is associated with poor survival in gastric cancer: an application of gene-expression and tissue array techniques

OBJECTIVES

To examine a population-based cohort for the association between clinicopathologic predictors of survival and immunohistochemical markers (IHC), and to assess changes in gene expression that are associated with lymphovascular invasion (LVI).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

LVI has been associated with poor survival and aggressive tumor behavior. The molecular changes responsible for the behavior of gastric cancer have yet to be determined. Characterization of IHC markers and gene expression profiles may identify molecular alterations governing tumor behavior.

METHODS

: Clinicopathologic and survival data of 114 patients were reviewed. Archival specimens were used to construct a multitumor tissue array that was subjected to IHC of selected protein targets. Correlation of IHC with tumor thickness (T status), LVI and prognosis was studied. Microarray analysis of fresh gastric cancer tissue was conducted to examine the gene expression profile with respect to LVI.

RESULTS

In a multivariate analysis, nodal status (N), metastasis (M), and LVI were independent predictors of survival. LVI was associated with a 5-year survival of 13.9% versus 55.9% in patients in whom it was absent. LVI correlated with advancing T status (P = 0.001) and N status (P < 0.001). IHC staining of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) correlated with T status, tumor grade, lymph node positivity, and IHC staining of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9). Microarray analyses suggested differential expression of oligophrenin-1 (OPHN1) and ribophorin-II (RPNII) with respect to LVI.

CONCLUSION

LVI was an independent predictor of survival in gastric cancer. Expression of COX-2 may facilitate tumor invasion through MMP-2 and MMP-9 activation. OPHN1 and RPN II appeared to be differentially expressed in gastric cancers exhibiting LVI. The reported function of OPHN1 and RPN II makes these gene products promising candidates for future studies involving LVI in gastric cancer.

Surgical Treatment of Rectal Cancer: Local Resection

Local treatment of rectal cancer aims to decrease the morbidity and the functional sequela associated with radical surgery without compromising local tumor control and long-term survival. Local excision is associated with a higher rate of local recurrence compared with radical surgery, and salvage radical surgery cannot guarantee equivalent long-term survival compared with radical surgery as the primary form of therapy. Therefore, strict criteria for patient selection are critical for local excision to be successful. Selecting the optimal therapy for an individual patient with rectal cancer is crucial and requires consideration of both tumor and patient characteristics. Endorectal ultrasonography is essential for the accurate assessment of rectal wall invasion and nodal metastasis. Only patients with well- or moderately differentiated T1 tumors without blood vessel or lymphatic vessel invasion are candidates for curative local excision as the only form of treatment. Tumors penetrating the muscularis propria should not be treated by local excision alone. These patients can be asked to participate in a trial of chemoradiation followed by local excision. Otherwise, they should undergo radical surgery. The tumor should be removed by full-thickness local excision with an adequate normal margin for pathologic evaluation. Final decisions regarding the treatment strategy should be based on the pathology of the surgical specimen. Intense, close follow-up is critical for early diagnosis of local recurrences as many of them may be surgically salvaged by radical resection. Local treatment can also be used for palliation of patients with histological unfavorable or advanced tumors, and those who are medically unfit for radical surgery.

Surgical Issues in Rectal Cancer: A 2004 Update

Rectal cancer is a major health concern in the United States, with an estimated 40,570 new cases diagnosed in 2004. There are 4 major goals in the treatment of a patient with rectal cancer: local control; long-term survival; preservation of anal sphincter, bladder, and sexual function; and maintenance or improvement in quality of life. Recent advances have been made in preoperative staging, local and radical surgical therapy, the importance of distal and circumferential resection margins, postoperative preservation of the anal sphincter mechanism and genitourinary function, and the role of laparoscopy in the treatment of these patients. Our aim is to outline some of the important surgical issues surrounding the management of patients with early-stage (T1/T2 N0) or locally advanced (T3/T4 and/or N1) rectal cancer.