Meta-analysis of sentinel node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Adding contrast-enhanced ultrasound can improve the predictive ability of breast conventional ultrasound and mammography for pathological upgrade of biopsy-confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) on top of breast conventional imaging for predicting the upgrading of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive cancer after surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 140 biopsy-proven DCIS lesions in 138 patients and divided them into two groups based on postoperative histopathology: non-upgrade and upgrade groups. Conventional ultrasound (US), mammography (MMG), CEUS and clinicopathological (CL) features were reviewed and compared between the two groups. The predictive performance of different models (with and without CEUS features) for histologic upgrade were compared to calculate the added value of CEUS.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine (42.1 %) lesions were histologically upgraded to invasive cancer after surgery. By logistic regression analyses, we found that high-grade DCIS at biopsy (P=0.004), ultrasonographic lesion size > 20 mm (P=0.007), mass-like lesion on US (P=0.030), the presence of suspicious calcification on MMG (P=0.014), the presence of perfusion defect (P=0.005) and the area under TIC>1021.34 ml (P<0.001) on CEUS were six independent factors predicting concomitant invasive components after surgery. The CL+US+MMG model made with the four predictors in the clinicopathologic, US and MMG categories yielded an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) value of 0.759 (95 % CI: 0.680-0.828) in predicting histological upgrade. The combination model built by adding the two CEUS predictors to the CL+US+MMG model showed higher predictive efficacy than the CL+US+MMG model (P=0.018), as the AUROC value was improved to 0.861 (95 % CI: 0.793-0.914).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to breast conventional imaging could improve the preoperative prediction of an upgrade to invasive cancer from CNB -proven DCIS lesions.

Radiological and pathological predictors of post-operative upstaging of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive ductal carcinoma and lymph-nodes metastasis; a potential algorithm for node surgical de-escalation

BACKGROUND/AIM

Ductal carcinoma in situ is considered a local disease with no metastatic potential, thus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) may be deemed an overtreatment. SLNB should be reserved for patients with invasive cancer, even though the risk of upstaging rises to 25 %. We aimed to identify clinicopathological predictors of post-operative upstaging in invasive carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of DCIS subjected to breast surgery between January 2017 to December 2021, and evaluated at the Breast Unit of PTV (Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome).

RESULTS

Out of 267 patients diagnosed with DCIS, 33(12.4 %) received a diagnosis upstaging and 9(3.37 %) patients presented with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis. In multivariate analysis, grade 3 tumor (OR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.2-5.6), dense nodule at mammography (OR 1.3; 95 % CI 1.1-2.6) and presence of a solid nodule at ultrasonography (OR 1.5; 95 % CI 1.2-2.6) were independent upstaging predictors. Differently, the independent predictors for SLNB metastasis were: upstaging (OR 2.1.; 95 % CI 1.2-4.6; p = 0.0079) and age between 40 and 60yrs (OR 1.4; 95 % CI 1.4-2.7; p = 0.027). All 9 patients with SLN metastasis received a diagnosis upstaging and were aged between 40 and 60 years old.

CONCLUSION

We identified pre-operative independent predictors of upstaging to invasive ductal carcinoma. The combined use of different predictors in an algorithm for surgical treatments of DCIS could reduce the numbers of unnecessary SLNB.

Toward Exempting from Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in T1 Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objective

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is used to assess the status of axillary lymph node (ALN), but it causes many adverse reactions. Considering the low rate of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in T1 breast cancer, this study aims to identify the characteristics of T1 breast cancer without SLN metastasis and to select T1 breast cancer patients who avoid SLNB through constructing a nomogram.

Methods

A total of 1,619 T1 breast cancer patients with SLNB in our hospital were enrolled in this study. Through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, we analyzed the tumor anatomical and clinicopathological factors and constructed the Heilongjiang Medical University (HMU) nomogram. We selected the patients exempt from SLNB by using the nomogram.

Results

In the training cohort of 1,000 cases, the SLN metastasis rate was 23.8%. Tumor volume, swollen axillary lymph nodes, pathological types, and molecular subtypes were found to be independent predictors for SLN metastasis in multivariate regression analysis. Distance from nipple or surface and position of tumor have no effect on SLN metastasis. A regression model based on the results of the multivariate analysis was developed to predict the risk of SLN metastasis, indicating an AUC of 0.798. It showed excellent diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.773) in the validation cohort.

Conclusion

The HMU nomogram for predicting SLN metastasis incorporates four variables, including tumor volume, swollen axillary lymph nodes, pathological types, and molecular subtypes. The SLN metastasis rates of intraductal carcinoma and HER2 enriched are 2.05% and 6.67%. These patients could be included in trials investigating the SLNB exemption.

Is Axillary Assessment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast Necessary in All Cases?

BACKGROUND

Staging of the axilla in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a point of controversy. We aimed to assess whether there is a group of patients in whom axillary assessment can be avoided and whether the likelihood of underdiagnosis of infiltrating carcinoma is sufficient to justify this evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients who were operated on between 2008 and 2018 in three Spanish hospitals, with a diagnosis by radiological or excisional biopsy of DCIS and clinically and radiologically negative axilla.

RESULTS

A total of 530 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS were studied. An axillary assessment was performed in 77% of the patients. In 397 patients, selective sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed. Axillary involvement was found in 7.2% of all patients, which dropped to 2.15% if we only included DCIS diagnosed after a definitive anatomical pathology analysis. Underdiagnosis was correlated with the type of biopsy performed: the risk was 1.34 times as high if the biopsy was performed with a core needle. The risk of lymph node metastasis was higher when there was lymphovascular invasion and when mastectomy was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose an axilla management algorithm in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS. The patients who would benefit from sentinel lymph node biopsy would be those who are not candidates for breast-conserving surgery, those with a BIRADS 5 lesion biopsied by core-needle biopsy, and those whose definitive diagnosis is lymphovascular invasion.

Prediction of Underestimation Using Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Patients Diagnosed as Ductal Carcinoma In Situ on Preoperative Core Biopsy

BACKGROUND

To assess the performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) for the prediction of DCIS underestimation in comparison with mammography, breast US, and breast MRI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients diagnosed with DCIS on preoperative core biopsy. Visibility, lesion type, and extent on each imaging modality, CESM gray values (CGV) were evaluated. Pathologic features of core biopsy and surgery were recorded. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test were used for univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to find independent predictors for DCIS underestimation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 113 lesions in 108 patients were analyzed (50 pure DCIS; 63 underestimated DCIS). Visibility on mammography, breast US, CESM, and breast MRI were 44%, 76%, 58%, and 80% for pure DCIS, and 73%, 81%, 86%, and 92% for underestimated DCIS. Tumor extents on surgical pathology of pure and underestimated DCIS were 1.11 ± 1.35 cm and 2.61 ± 2.09 cm. On multivariate analysis, nuclear grade and suspected invasion on core biopsy, visibility on mammography, and extent on breast MRI were independent factors for the model 1, whereas nuclear grade on core biopsy, extent on CESM, and mean CGV on MLO-recombined image were independent factors for the model 2. Area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.843 for model 1 including breast MRI, whereas AUC was 0.823 for model 2 including CESM, which didn't show a significant difference (P = .968).

CONCLUSION

For detecting underestimated DCIS, CESM was superior to mammography and breast US, and comparable to breast MRI.

Clinicopathological predictors of postoperative upstaging to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study

Background

We conducted a prospective study with the intention to omit surgery for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. We aimed to identify clinicopathological predictors of postoperative upstaging to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in patients preoperatively diagnosed with DCIS.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with DCIS diagnosed through biopsy between April 1, 2010 and December 31, 2014, from 16 institutions. Clinical, radiological, and histological variables were collected from medical records.

Results

We identified 2,293 patients diagnosed with DCIS through biopsy, including 1,663 DCIS (72.5%) cases and 630 IDC (27.5%) cases. In multivariate analysis, the presence of a palpable mass (odds ratio [OR] 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–2.6), mammography findings (≥ category 4; OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2–2.6), mass formations on ultrasonography (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2–2.5), and tumor size on MRI (> 20 mm; OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2–2.4) were independent predictors of IDC. Among patients with a tumor size on MRI of ≤ 20 mm, the possibility of postoperative upstaging to IDC was 22.1%. Among the 258 patients with non-palpable mass, nuclear grade 1/2, and positive for estrogen receptor, the possibility was 18.1%, even if the upper limit of the tumor size on MRI was raised to ≤ 40 mm.

Conclusion

We identified four independent predictive factors of upstaging to IDC after surgery among patients with DCIS diagnosed by biopsy. The combined use of various predictors of IDC reduces the possibility of postoperative upstaging to IDC, even if the tumor size on MRI is larger than 20 mm.

Application of magnetic resonance computer-aided diagnosis for preoperatively determining invasive disease in ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ

The aim of this study was to analyze kinetic and morphologic features using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) with computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) to predict occult invasive components in cases of biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).We enrolled 138 patients with 141 breasts who underwent preoperative breast MRI and were diagnosed with DCIS via ultrasonography (US)-guided core needle biopsy performed at our institution during January 2009 to December 2012. Their clinical, mammographic, ultrasonographic, MRI, and final histologic findings were retrospectively reviewed. Their mammographic, ultrasonographic, and MRI findings were analyzed according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. CAD findings of detectability, initial (fast, medium, and slow) and delay (persistent, plateau, and washout) phase enhancement kinetic descriptor, peak enhancement percentage, and lesion size were evaluated. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed using independent t test and χ or Fisher exact test, respectively. Independent factors for predicting the presence of invasive component were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis.Final histologic findings revealed that 55 breasts (39%) had DCIS with an invasive component. MRI-detected, CAD-detected, or pathologic lesion size (P = .002, P = .001, P < .001, respectively), delay washout kinetics and detectability on CAD (P < .001 and P = .004, respectively), presence of symptoms (P = .01), presence of comedonecrosis (P < .001), nuclear grade (P = .001), abnormality on mammography (P = .02), or US (P = .03) were significantly different between pure DCIS and the DCIS with an invasive component group on univariate analysis. Of those findings, multivariate analysis revealed that delay washout on CAD (odds ratio [OR], 4.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96-9.69; P = .0003) and pathologic size (OR, 1.29; 95% CI 1.05-1.57; P = .014) were independent predictive factors for the presence of an invasive component.Delay washout kinetic features measured by CAD and pathologic tumor size are potentially useful for predicting occult invasion in cases of biopsy-proven DCIS.Breast MRI including a CAD system would be helpful for predicting invasive components in cases of biopsy-proven DCIS and for selecting patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Axillary evaluation is not warranted in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ by core needle biopsy

Background

Patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by core needle biopsy (CNB) have a great chance of upstaging to invasive cancer. Positive axillary status can be found in these patients. This study sought to identify clinicopathological factors associated with upstaging and axillary metastasis in patients preoperatively diagnosed with DCIS by CNB.

Materials and Methods

This study identified 604 patients (cT1‐3N0M0) with preoperative diagnosis of pure DCIS by CNB who had undergone axillary evaluation from August 2006 to December 2015 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC). Predictors of upstaging and axillary lymph nodes metastasis were analyzed, respectively.

Results

Of all 604 patients, 121 (20.03%) and 193 (31.95%) patients were upstaged to DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) and invasive breast cancer (IBC). Positive axillary lymph nodes were identified in 41 (6.79%) patients. Predictors of upstaging included tumor size on ultrasonography (>2 cm) (OR 1.786, P = .002) and ER+HER2+ status (OR 1.874, P = .022) in multivariate analysis. Factors associated with axillary lymph nodes metastasis included tumor size on pathology (OR 2.336, P = .038) and number of lesions (OR 3.354, P = .039) in multivariate analysis. In addition, upstaging on final pathology had a significant influence on axillary lymph nodes status (P < .001).

Conclusion

Axillary evaluation was recommended in patients with larger tumor size (>2 cm), multifocal lesions or ER+HER2+ status. Despite of a 51.98% upstaging rate, the rate of axillary metastasis in these patients was relatively low, supporting the omission of axillary evaluation in selected patients with low risk of upstaging or axillary metastasis.

Evidence map of ductal carcinoma in situ management options

OBJECTIVE

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has the potential to progress to invasive carcinoma. The optimal management of DCIS and methods for individualizing treatment of DCIS are still being determined. This evidence map depicts the robustness and topical span of research on DCIS management choice on patient-centered and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed Health, PROSPERO, and clinical practice guideline sites to identify systematic reviews of DCIS management options and consulted with topic experts. A bubble plot visualizes the literature volume and research content for patient-centered outcomes. An online decision tree facilitates discussions with patients and guides through the available evidence.

RESULTS

In total, 40 systematic reviews met inclusion criteria. The research syntheses addressed DCIS management options, including the role of magnetic resonance imaging, axillary surgery/sentinel lymph node biopsy, and excisional biopsy. The map shows existing evidence for mutually exclusive treatment options including active surveillance, breast-conserving surgery, nipple sparing mastectomy, and simple mastectomy. Research findings for intraoperative radiation, adjuvant radiation therapy, adjuvant hormone therapy, hypofractionation radiotherapy, accelerated partial breast irradiation, radiation therapy plus boost, and combined radiation and hormone therapy, as well as for breast reconstruction after mastectomy and surveillance mammography postsurgery are also displayed. The evidence map highlights a scarcity of robust evidence on patient-centered outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence map provides an overview of DCIS research showing the range of management options and remaining decisional dilemmas that follow a diagnosis of DCIS. It maps the evidence in accessible tools to guide practice and future research. : Video Summary:http://links.lww.com/MENO/A448.

Predictive factors of axillary positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in extended ductal carcinoma in situ treated by simple mastectomy at once

BACKGROUND

The incidence of positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) ranged from 0 to 14%. The main hypothesis would be the presence of an invasive contingent on the final histology. The objective was to identify predictive factors of sentinel lymph node positivity in the management of extended ductal carcinoma in situ treated by simple mastectomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study carried out at the Lorraine Cancer Institute from January 2003 to December 2017. Women with DCIS on core-needle biopsy whose management consisted of simple mastectomy and SLNB procedure were included.

RESULTS

188 patients were analyzed. Preoperatively, 18 patients (9.6%) had DCIS with microinvasion, while the others had pure DCIS. Eight patients (4.2%) had positive sentinel lymph node biopsy, the majority of which were single micrometastases. Predictive factor of node invasion was microinvasion on biopsy (p<0.01). Only in cases of pure DCIS, the percentage of positive SLNB was reduced to 2.9%. Invasive carcinoma was found in the majority of patients with positive axillary SLNB procedure (75%, n=6), compared to 16.7% (n=30) without SLNB involvement (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The low rate of positive sentinel node biopsy in pure ductal carcinoma in situ suggests that in the absence of microinvasion, the sentinel procedure would seem less appropriate. New techniques for identifying sentinel lymph node biopsy could report axillary staging after definitive histologic results.

Ductal carcinoma in situ: to treat or not to treat, that is the question

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) now represents 20-25% of all 'breast cancers' consequent upon detection by population-based breast cancer screening programmes. Currently, all DCIS lesions are treated, and treatment comprises either mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery supplemented with radiotherapy. However, most DCIS lesions remain indolent. Difficulty in discerning harmless lesions from potentially invasive ones can lead to overtreatment of this condition in many patients. To counter overtreatment and to transform clinical practice, a global, comprehensive and multidisciplinary collaboration is required. Here we review the incidence of DCIS, the perception of risk for developing invasive breast cancer, the current treatment options and the known molecular aspects of progression. Further research is needed to gain new insights for improved diagnosis and management of DCIS, and this is integrated in the PRECISION (PREvent ductal Carcinoma In Situ Invasive Overtreatment Now) initiative. This international effort will seek to determine which DCISs require treatment and prevent the consequences of overtreatment on the lives of many women affected by DCIS.

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: an update for the pathologist in the era of individualized risk assessment and tailored therapies

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a neoplastic proliferation of mammary ductal epithelial cells confined to the ductal-lobular system, and a non-obligate precursor of invasive disease. While there has been a significant increase in the diagnosis of DCIS in recent years due to uptake of mammography screening, there has been little change in the rate of invasive recurrence, indicating that a large proportion of patients diagnosed with DCIS will never develop invasive disease. The main issue for clinicians is how to reliably predict the prognosis of DCIS in order to individualize patient treatment, especially as treatment ranges from surveillance only, breast-conserving surgery only, to breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy and/or hormonal therapy, and mastectomy with or without radiotherapy. We conducted a semi-structured literature review to address the above issues relating to "pure" DCIS. Here we discuss the pathology of DCIS, risk factors for recurrence, biomarkers and molecular signatures, and disease management. Potential mechanisms of progression from DCIS to invasive cancer and problems faced by clinicians and pathologists in diagnosing and treating this disease are also discussed. Despite the tremendous research efforts to identify accurate risk stratification predictors of invasive recurrence and response to radiotherapy and endocrine therapy, to date there is no simple, well-validated marker or group of variables for risk estimation, particularly in the setting of adjuvant treatment after breast-conserving surgery. Thus, the standard of care to date remains breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy, with or without hormonal therapy. Emerging tools, such as pathologic or biologic markers, may soon change such practice. Our review also includes recent advances towards innovative treatment strategies, including targeted therapies, immune modulators, and vaccines.

Current Therapeutic Approaches to DCIS

Treatment for ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) has historically been extrapolated from studies of invasive breast cancer. Accepted local therapy approaches range from small local excisions, with or without radiation, to bilateral mastectomies. Systemic treatment with endocrine therapy is often recommended for hormone positive patients. With improvements in imaging, pathologic review, and treatment techniques in the modern era, combined with new information regarding tumor biology, the management of DCIS is rapidly evolving. A multidisciplinary approach to treatment is now more important than ever, with a shift towards de-escalating therapy to reduce treatment related toxicity. This review focuses on nuances of clinical management of DCIS in the modern era, highlighting key differences between DCIS as compared to invasive breast cancer. The American Cancer Society (ACS) currently recommends beginning screening with annual mammograms for women age 45, with the option to start at age 40. As treatment of DCIS has not been shown to impact survival, the USPSTF has more conservative screening recommendations of biennial mammograms from age 50-74. Unlike invasive breast cancer, DCIS is almost exclusively diagnosed by mammographic detection, and lymph node evaluation is not recommended. Pathologic review of biopsy specimens should follow the guidelines of the College of American Pathologists. Surgical management options include breast conservation, mastectomy, or possibly nipple sparing mastectomy, with upfront sentinel lymph node evaluation in the case of mastectomy. Radiation therapy is generally recommended as a component of breast conserving therapy for patients with DCIS, though in some low risk patients, there is trial data to suggest that adjuvant radiation may be omitted. Techniques for minimizing radiation toxicity should always be emphasized. Endocrine therapy is offered to women with hormone positive DCIS who have undergone lumpectomy for risk reduction, and has the benefit of decreasing incidence of events in both the ipsilateral and contralateral breast. More recent studies have explored use of targeted treatments such as trastuzumab in DCIS for HER2 overexpression. Future directions include tailoring therapy based on patient characteristics and tumor biology. With so many different options for treatment, it is also critical to engage in a discussion with the patient to arrive at a treatment decision that balances patient preferences for disease control versus treatment toxicity, financial toxicity, cosmesis, and quality of life.

Prognostic impact and possible pathogenesis of lymph node metastasis in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

PURPOSE

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)-preinvasive breast cancer-with lymph node metastasis can clinically be treated as different stages: occult invasive cancer with true metastasis (T1N1) or pure DCIS with iatrogenic dissemination (TisN0). In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to elucidate the prognostic impact and possible pathogenesis of nodal metastasis in DCIS to improve clinical management.

METHODS

Subjects were comprised of 427 patients with routine postoperative diagnosis of DCIS who underwent sentinel node (SN) biopsy using molecular whole-lymph-node analysis. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were compared between SN-positive and -negative patients. Primary tumour tissues of SN-positive patients were exhaustively step-sectioned to detect occult invasions, and predictive factors for occult invasion were investigated. Median follow-up time was 73.6 months.

RESULTS

Of the 427 patients, 19 (4.4%) were SN-positive and 408 (95.6%) were SN-negative. More SN-positive patients received adjuvant systemic therapy than SN-negative patients (84.2% vs. 5.4%). Seven-year distant disease-free survivals were favourable for both cohorts (SN-positive, 100%; SN-negative, 99.7%). By examining 1421 slides, occult invasion was identified in 9 (47.4%) of the 19 SN-positive patients. Tumour burdens in SN and incidence of non-SN metastasis were similar between patients with and without occult invasion, and no predictive factor for occult invasion was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Node-positive DCIS has favourable prognosis with adjuvant systemic therapy. Half of the cases may be occult invasive cancer with true metastasis. In practical settings, clinicians may have to treat these tumours as node-positive small invasive cancers because it is difficult to predict the pathogenesis without exhaustive primary tumour sectioning.

Simplifying Logistics and Avoiding the Unnecessary in Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Sentinel Node Biopsy. A Prospective Feasibility Trial of the Preoperative Injection of Super Paramagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles

PURPOSE

Sentinel node is routinely localized with the intraoperative use of a radioactive tracer, involving challenging logistics. Super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle is a non-radioactive tracer with comparable performance that could allow for preoperative localization, would simplify the procedure, and possibly be of value in axillary mapping before neoadjuvant treatment. The current trial aimed to determine the a priori hypothesis that the injection of super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in the preoperative period for the localization of the sentinel node is feasible.

METHODS

This is a prospective feasibility trial, conducted from 9 September 2014 to 22 October 2014 at Uppsala University Hospital. In all, 12 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer planned for resection of the primary and sentinel node biopsy were recruited. Super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles were injected in the preoperative visit in the outpatient clinic. The radioactive tracer (⁹⁹mTc) and the blue dye were injected perioperatively in standard fashion. A volunteer was injected with super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles to follow the decline in the magnetic signal in the sentinel node over time. The primary outcome was successful sentinel node detection.

RESULTS

Super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles' detection after preoperative injection (3-15 days) was successful in all cases (100%). In the volunteer, axillary signal was presented for 4 weeks. No adverse effects were noted. Conclusion and relevance: Preoperative super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles' injection is feasible and leads to successful detection of the sentinel node. That may lead to simplified logistics as well as the identification, sampling, and marking of the sentinel node in patients planned for neoadjuvant treatment.

Sentinel node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Never justified?

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is not standard of care. However, nodal involvement for DCIS patients is reported. Aim of our study was to identify preoperative features predictive of nodal involvement in DCIS patients. We have retrospectively reviewed 175 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS following a vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, and undergoing surgery with sentinel node biopsy. Variables distribution was compared between patients upstaged to invasive cancer at final pathology and patients with a confirmed DCIS, and between positive vs negative sentinel node patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for risk of a positive node. Lymph node biopsy was positive in 13 (7.4%) patients, with 8 (61.5%) macrometastases and 5 (38.5%) micrometastases. In these patients, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) index >4 (OR 4.69, 95% CI 1.282-17.224, P = .02), lesion extension ≥20 mm (OR 4.25, 95% CI 1.255-14.447, P = .02), multifocal disease (OR 4.12, 95% CI 0.987-17.174, P = .05), comedo type (OR 3.54, 95% CI 1.044-11.969, P = .04), and upstaging (OR 4.56, 95% CI 1.080-19.249, P = .04) were all predictive of nodal involvement, although upstaging could not be predicted preoperatively. By multivariate analysis, the only independent factor predictive for positive sentinel node was multifocal disease (OR 5.14, 95% CI 1.015-26.066, P < .05). A preoperative diagnosis of DCIS, also including advanced biopsy systems such as vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, may be not always sufficient to exclude patients from sentinel node biopsy. DCIS patients with associated BI-RADS >4, lesion extension ≥20 mm, comedo type, and above all multifocal disease should be considered for axillary evaluation.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: A Clinical Review and Update

Sentinel lymph node biopsy has become a standard staging tool in the surgical management of breast cancer. The positive impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy on postoperative negative outcomes in breast cancer patients, without compromising the oncological outcomes, is its major advantage. It has evolved over the last few decades and has proven its utility beyond early breast cancer. Its applicability and efficacy in patients with clinically positive axilla who have had a complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is being aggressively evaluated at present. This article discusses how sentinel lymph node biopsy has evolved and is becoming a useful tool in new clinical scenarios of breast cancer management.

Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as the sole method for sentinel node biopsy detection in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) using superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles is a novel method in breast cancer. Several studies have verified the non-inferiority of SPIO compared with the standard use of radioisotope ^99m Tc with or without blue dye. The aim of the MONOS study presented here was to evaluate the use of SPIO as a sole tracer and the efficacy of tracer injection in the preoperative setting.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study was carried out in two hospitals, one using ^99m Tc and the other SPIO. ^99m Tc was injected in the morning of the day of surgery or the day before. SPIO was either injected before surgery in the outpatient clinic or 1 h before the operation.

RESULTS

A total of 338 consecutive patients with breast cancer underwent 343 procedures; SPIO nanoparticles were used in 184 procedures and ^99m Tc-labelled tracer in 159. Detection rates for SPIO and ^99m Tc were 95·6 and 96·9 per cent respectively (P = 0·537). All nodes with SPIO uptake were coloured brown. Fewer nodes were retrieved with SPIO (mean 1·35 versus 1·89), regardless of whether blue dye was used (P < 0·001). Preoperative SPIO injection (58·7 per cent of procedures), a median of 16 (range 2-27) days before the procedure, was associated with a better tracer-specific detection rate (95·3 versus 86 per cent; P = 0·031) and retrieval of more nodes (mean 1·43 versus 1·03; P < 0·001) than perioperative administration. Skin staining was present in 39·9 per cent of patients, and was related to breast-conserving surgery and periareolar injection.

CONCLUSION

The use of SPIO alone is a safe alternative, with results comparable to those of the standard dual technique using ^99m Tc and blue dye. The efficacy of injection in the preoperative setting simplifies logistics and improves performance. Skin staining can be prevented by a deeper peritumoral injection.

Sentinel Node Procedure Obsolete in Lumpectomy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

BACKGROUND

Patients with a preoperative needle-biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) may have an indication for a sentinel lymph node biopsy if invasive carcinoma is found. We investigated how often a positive sentinel node and invasive carcinoma occurred in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS and whether this influenced the adjuvant regime.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2005 to 2014, the records of 240 patients with needle-biopsy diagnosis of DCIS were retrospectively reviewed for postoperative pathology outcomes of the sentinel node and breast, and decisions on adjuvant treatment. Descriptive statistics and univariable and multivariable analysis were used.

RESULTS

A total of 160 of 240 patients underwent a sentinel node biopsy. Sixteen of 85 patients undergoing lumpectomy had occult invasive cancer. One patient had a micrometastasis. In patients undergoing mastectomy, 30 of 155 patients had occult invasive cancer. One patient had a micrometastasis, and 3 had a macrometastases. Eleven patients received adjuvant treatment as a result of invasive cancer. Three patients received adjuvant treatment (radiotherapy of the axilla or axillary dissection) because of node positivity. These patients underwent a primary mastectomy.

CONCLUSION

A positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with needle-biopsy diagnosis of ductal DCIS is rare and rarely changes adjuvant regimes. Current Dutch guidelines should be updated.

Utilization of Axillary Surgery for Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Report From the National Cancer Data Base

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the use of axillary surgery (AS), including sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and the factors associated with its use. To determine whether utilization of SLNB is appropriate, predictors of SLNB performance were compared with factors predictive of tumor upstaging.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was utilized to identify patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical stage 0 breast cancer treated from 2004 to 2013. DCIS with microinvasion was excluded. Chi square tests and logistic regression were used to examine patient, tumor, and facility features associated with SLNB and tumor upstaging.

RESULTS

Of the 218,945 total patients, 155,093 (70.8 %) underwent lumpectomy, and 63,852 (29.2 %) underwent mastectomy. SLNB was performed for 19.0 % of lumpectomy patients and 63.5 % of mastectomy patients. Multivariate analysis for 2012-2013 demonstrated that estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and grade 3 tumors were more likely to be treated with SLNB in both groups. Tumor size was significant only for the lumpectomy patients who underwent one operation. Further, 22.8 % of lumpectomy patients and 18.7 % of mastectomy patients who underwent AS were upstaged compared with 1.8 % of lumpectomy and 3.6 % of mastectomy patients who did not undergo AS. Tumor upstaging was predicted by ER-negative status (odds ratio [OR] 2.99; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.76-3.24) but not by higher grade or larger tumor size.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of SLNB for DCIS is high with mastectomy, and nearly one fifth of the lumpectomy patients underwent SLNB. However, the performance of AS was strongly associated with the likelihood of upstaging in both groups, suggesting that surgical judgment plays an important role in this decision.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically detected ductal carcinoma in situ

AIM: To study the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (CD-DCIS).

METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 20 patients with an initial diagnosis of pure DCIS by an image-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) between June 2006 and June 2012 was conducted at King Faisal Specialist Hospital. The accuracy of performing SLNB in CD-DCIS, the rate of sentinel and non-sentinel nodal metastasis, and the histologic underestimation rate of invasive cancer at initial diagnosis were analyzed. The inclusion criteria were a preoperative diagnosis of pure DCIS with no evidence of invasion. We excluded any patient with evidence of microinvasion or invasion. There were two cases of mammographically detected DCIS and 18 cases of CD-DCIS. All our patients were diagnosed by an image-guided CNB except two patients who were diagnosed by fine needle aspiration (FNA). All patients underwent breast surgery, SLNB, and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) if the SLN was positive.

RESULTS: Twenty patients with an initial diagnosis of pure DCIS underwent SLNB, 2 of whom had an ALND. The mean age of the patients was 49.7 years (range, 35-70). Twelve patients (60%) were premenopausal and 8 (40%) were postmenopausal. CNB was the diagnostic procedure for 18 patients, and 2 who were diagnosed by FNA were excluded from the calculation of the underestimation rate. Two out of 20 had a positive SLNB and underwent an ALND and neither had additional non sentinel lymph node metastasis. Both the sentinel visualization rate and the intraoperative sentinel identification rate were 100%. The false negative rate was 0%. Only 2 patients had a positive SLNB (10%) and neither had additional metastasis following an ALND. After definitive surgery, 3 patients were upstaged to invasive ductal carcinoma (3/18 = 16.6%) and 3 other patients were upstaged to DCIS with microinvasion (3/18 = 16.6%). Therefore the histologic underestimation rate of invasive disease was 33%.

CONCLUSION: SLNB in CD-DCIS is technically feasible and highly accurate. We recommend limiting SLNB to patients undergoing a mastectomy.

Is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Indicated at Completion Mastectomy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is recommended when mastectomy is performed for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The role of SLNB for women with DCIS who undergo mastectomy following one or more attempts at breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is uncertain. We examined the upgrade rate and SLNB yield in women who converted to mastectomy after one or more attempts at BCS for DCIS.

METHODS

All patients who underwent one or more attempts at BCS prior to conversion to mastectomy with SLNB for DCIS were identified. Margin status as the indication for mastectomy was confirmed, and comparisons were made between patients with/without upgrade on final pathology.

RESULTS

From February 2006 to November 2012, a total of 233 patients underwent completion mastectomy following one or more attempts at BCS for positive/close margins (median age 50 years; range 34-84). The median number of BCS attempts was 1 (range 1-4). Overall, 20 (9 %) patients were upgraded on final pathology; 15 (6 %) stage I, and 5 (3 %) stage II (three micrometastasis, two macrometastasis). In two of five cases with a positive SLN, invasive carcinoma was not identified in the mastectomy specimen. The only factor associated with any upgrade was the presence of micropapillary DCIS (80 vs. 55 %, with and without upgrade; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients with DCIS who converted to mastectomy for positive/close margins after one or more attempts at BCS, 18 (8 %) would have required second-stage axillary surgery had an SLNB not been performed, and in two (1 %) patients, the SLN provided the only evidence of invasion. These findings support the recommendation for SLNB at the time of completion mastectomy.

Intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity predicts invasive components in breast ductal carcinoma in situ

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated whether texture-based imaging parameters could identify invasive components of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

METHODS

We enrolled 65 biopsy-confirmed DCIS patients (62 unilateral, 3 bilateral) who underwent (18) F-FDG PET, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), or breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI). We measured SUV max and intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity by the area under the curve (AUC) of cumulative SUV histograms (CSH) on PET, tumour-to-normal ratio (TNR) and coefficient of variation (COV) as an index of heterogeneity on BSGI, minimum ADC (ADC min ) and ADC difference (ADC diff ) as an index of heterogeneity on DWI. After surgery, final pathology was categorized as pure-DCIS (DCIS-P), DCIS with microinvasion (DCIS-MI), or invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Clinicopathologic features of DCIS were correlated with final classification.

RESULTS

Final pathology confirmed 44 DCIS-P, 14 DCIS-MI, and 10 IDC. The invasive component of DCIS was significantly correlated with higher SUV max (p = 0.017) and lower AUC-CSH (p < 0.001) on PET, higher TNR (p = 0.008) and COV (p = 0.035) on BSGI, lower ADC min (p = 0.016) and higher ADC diff (p = 0.009) on DWI, and larger pathologic size (p = 0.018). On multiple regression analysis, AUC-CSH was the only significant predictor of invasive components (p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

The intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity of (18) F-FDG PET was the most important predictor of invasive components of DCIS.

KEY POINTS

• Preoperative identification of invasion in DCIS is important for axillary nodal management • Higher SUV max and lower AUC-CSH from FDG PET may indicate invasive components of DCIS • Higher TNR and COV from BSGI may indicate invasive components of DCIS • Lower ADC min and higher ADC diff from DWI may indicate invasive components of DCIS • AUC-CSH, an index of metabolic heterogeneity, is an independent predictor for invasive components.

Long-term prospective cohort study of patients undergoing pancreatectomy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: implications for postoperative surveillance

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term follow-up results after surgical treatment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) to optimize postoperative surveillance strategies.

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the postoperative natural history of IPMN, especially about long-term follow-up results in patients with benign or noninvasive IPMN.

METHODS

Long-term follow-up was undertaken in a prospective cohort of 403 consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment of IPMN at Seoul National University Hospital. Of these, 37 patients with ductal adenocarcinoma arising in IPMN were excluded from the analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 366 patients, 82 had low-grade dysplasia, 171 had intermediate-grade dysplasia, 45 had high-grade dysplasia, and 68 had IPMN with associated invasive carcinoma. During a median follow-up of 44.4 months, the overall recurrence rate was 10.7%. Pathologic grade of dysplasia was associated with recurrence rate (P < 0.001). IPMNs involving main duct had higher rate of recurrence (P = 0.021). Of the 298 patients with benign or noninvasive IPMN, 16 (5.4%) had recurrences including distant metastasis. Multivariate analysis revealed that the degree of dysplasia was the most important predictor of recurrence (P < 0.001). The overall 5-year disease-free survival rate was 78.9% and was significantly lower in patients with high-grade dysplasia than in those with low- or intermediate-grade dysplasia (P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic IPMNs recur in 10.7% of patients. Recurrence is correlated with the degree of dysplasia, and 5.4% of patients with benign or noninvasive IPMN have recurrences including distant metastasis. Thorough postoperative surveillance is needed not only for patients with invasive IPMN but also for those with benign or noninvasive IPMN, especially for patients with high-grade dysplasia.

A simple model to assess the probability of invasion in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast diagnosed by needle biopsy

Objectives. The aim of the study was to develop a clinical prediction model for assessing the probability of having invasive cancer in the definitive surgical resection specimen in patients with biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast, to facilitate decision making regarding axillary surgery. Methods. In 349 women with DCIS, predictors of invasion in the definitive resection specimen were identified. A model to predict the probability of invasion was developed and subsequently simplified to divide patients into two risk categories. The model's performance was validated on another patient population. Results. Multivariate logistic regression revealed four independent predictors of invasion: (i) suspicious (micro)invasion in the biopsy specimen; (ii) visibility of the lesion on ultrasonography; (iii) size of the lesion on mammography >30 mm; (iv) clinical palpability of the lesion. The actual frequency of invasion in the high-risk patient group in the test and validation population was 52.6% and 48.3%, respectively; in the low-risk group it was 16.8% and 7.1%, respectively. Conclusion. The model proved to have good performance. In patients with a low probability of invasion, an axillary procedure can be omitted without a substantial risk of additional surgery.

Incidence and prediction of invasive disease and nodal metastasis in preoperatively diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ

For breast cancer patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy has been proposed as an axillary staging procedure in selected patients with a higher likelihood of having occult invasive lesions. With detailed histological examination of primary tumors and molecular whole-node analysis of SNs, we aimed to validate whether this selective application accurately identifies patients with SN metastasis. The subjects were 336 patients with a preoperative needle-biopsy diagnosis of DCIS who underwent SN biopsy using the one-step nucleic acid amplification assay in the period 2009–2011. The incidence and preoperative predictors of upstaging to invasive disease on final pathology and SN metastasis, and their correlation, were investigated. Of the 336 patients, 113 (33.6%) had invasive disease, and 6 (1.8%) and 17 (5.0%) had macro- and micrometastasis in axillary nodes respectively. Of the 113 patients with invasive disease, 4 (3.5%) and 9 (8.0%) had macro- and micrometastasis. Predictors of invasive disease included palpability, mammographic mass, and calcifications (spread >20 mm), and intraductal solid structure, but no predictor was found for SN metastasis. Therefore, even though occult invasive disease was found at final pathology, most of the patients had no metastasis or only micrometastasis in axillary nodes. Predictors of invasive disease and SN metastasis were not completely consistent, so the selective SN biopsy for patients with a higher risk of invasive disease may not accurately identify those with SN metastasis. More accurate application of SN biopsy is required for patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS.

A rare case of non-invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast coexisting with follicular lymphoma: A case report with a review of the literature

The double presentation of breast cancer and follicular lymphoma is extremely rare, and only six cases have previously been reported in the literature. In the present study, a case of synchronous ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast and follicular lymphoma is reported. During an annual breast screening procedure, a 49-year-old female presented with a hard induration under the nipple of the right breast and swelling of a soft lymph node (LN) in the right axilla. Mammography and ultrasonography revealed two lesions in the right breast: One was a tumor with microcalcification, 1.0 cm in diameter, and the other was a large, crude calcification, 2.5 cm in diameter. In addition, computed tomography and positron emission tomography revealed swellings of the bilateral axillary (Ax) LN and intra-abdominal para-aortic LN. The patient underwent excisions of the large calcified mass, a micro-calcified tumor and the right AxLN. The pathological and immunohistochemical studies revealed fat necrosis and DCIS of the breast, which was positive for the estrogen receptor and the progesterone receptor, while human epidermal growth factor receptor II protein expression was evaluated as 2+ and stage was classified as pTis pN0 M0, stage 0. Furthermore, the Ax node was diagnosed as follicular lymphoma, which was positive for cluster of differentiation (CD)20, CD79a, CD10 and B-cell lymphoma (Bcl)-2 protein, but negative for Bcl-6 protein. The clinical stage was classified as stage III. The patient was administered chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy to the conserved breast. Two years have passed since the surgery, and the patient is disease-free.

Incidence of and risk factors for sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with a postoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ

Background

Positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are found in up to 13 per cent of women with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast and in up to 4 per cent of those with a postoperative diagnosis. This retrospective national register study investigated the incidence of positive SLNs in women with a postoperative diagnosis of DCIS, and the value of additional tumour sectioning to identify occult tumour invasion.

Methods

All surgical patients with a final histopathological diagnosis of pure DCIS registered in the Swedish national breast cancer register in 2008 and 2009 were eligible. Additional sectioning was performed on archived primary tumour tissue from women with SLN metastasis (including cases of isolated tumour cells) and matched SLN-negative control patients with the aim of detecting occult invasion.

Results

SLN tumour deposits were reported in 11 of 753 women who had SLN biopsy (macrometastases, 2; micrometastases, 3; isolated tumour cells, 6), resulting in a SLN positivity rate of 0·7 per cent (5 of 753). Occult invasion was found in one (9 per cent) of these 11 patients and in two (10 per cent) of 21 control patients. No risk factors for SLN metastasis were identified.

Conclusion

SLN positivity is rare in women with a histopathological diagnosis of pure DCIS. Additional primary tumour assessment may reveal occult invasion in both SLN metastasis-positive and -negative patients. The value of performing SLN biopsy in the setting of a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS was limited, and current Swedish practice should therefore be questioned.

Sentinel lymph node status and axillary lymph node dissection in the surgical treatment of breast cancer

Axillary lymph node dissection has been traditionally perceived as a therapeutic and a staging procedure and unselectively removes all axillary lymph nodes. There still remains some controversy as concerns the survival benefit associated with axillary clearance. Sentinel lymph node biopsy removes the most likely sites of regional metastases, the lymph nodes directly connected with the primary tumour. It allows a more accurate staging and a selective indication for clearing the axilla, restricting this to patients who may benefit of it. Axillary dissection was performed in all patients during the learning phase of sentinel lymphadenectomy, but later only patients with metastasis to a sentinel node underwent this operation. Currently, even some patients with minimal sentinel node involvement, including some with macrometastasis may skip axillary clearance. This review summarizes the changes that have occurred in the surgical management of the axilla, the evidences and controversies behind these changes, along with current recommendations. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(6), 203–215.

Time trends and inter-hospital variation in treatment and axillary staging of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the era of screening in Southern Netherlands

BACKGROUND

To examine variation in time and place in axillary staging and treatment of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.

METHODS

Trends in patients with DCIS recorded in the Eindhoven Cancer Registry diagnosed in 1991-2010 (n = 2449) were examined.

RESULTS

The use of breast conserving surgery (BCS) went from 17% to 67% in 1991-2010 and administration of radiotherapy after BCS increased to 89%. Axillary lymph node dissection decreased to almost 0%, while sentinel node biopsy was performed in 65% of patients in 2010. The proportion who underwent BCS varied between hospitals from 49% to 80%; the proportion without axillary staging ranged from 21% to 60%. Patients with screen-detected DCIS were more likely to receive BCS.

CONCLUSION

There was considerable variation in the use of BCS, radiotherapy, and axillary staging of DCIS over time and between hospitals. Patients with DCIS were more likely to be treated with BCS if their disease was detected by screening.

A differential intra-operative molecular biological test for the detection of sentinel lymph node metastases in breast carcinoma. An extended experience from the first U.K. centre routinely offering the service in clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

One-Step Nucleic acid Amplification (OSNA) is a molecular biological assay of cytokeratin-19 (a breast epithelial marker) mRNA. It can be employed intra-operatively for detection of lymph node metastases in breast carcinoma. Patients with positive sentinel nodes may proceed to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) level I or higher dependent upon the OSNA quantitative result, during the same surgical procedure, avoiding a second operation and eliminating the technical difficulties possibly associated with delayed ALND.

AIMS

Our Breast Unit was the first in the UK to implement this novel technique in routine practice. This study reviews our first 44-month data following introduction of OSNA "live" on whole sentinel nodes following an extensive validation study (Snook et al.).(9) METHODS: Data was collected prospectively from the period of introduction 01/12/2008 to 30/08/2012. All patients eligible for sentinel node biopsy were offered OSNA and operations were performed by five consultant breast surgeons. On detection of macro-metastasis a level II/III and for a micro-metastasis a level I ALND was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 859 patients (1709 sentinel lymph nodes) were analysed. All except one were females. The majority underwent wide local excision (73.4%, n = 631) or mastectomy 25% (n = 215) and 1.6% (13) underwent SLN biopsy alone. IDC was seen in 79% (n = 680) of the patients and 53.5% (n = 460) had grade II tumours. One-third (30.8%, n = 265) had positive sentinel nodes and had further axillary surgery at the time of SLN biopsy. Of these, 47% (n = 125/265) had macro-metastases, 38% (n = 101/265) had micro-metastases and 14.7% (n = 39/265) had "positive but inhibited" results. Positive non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLN) were seen in 35% (44/125) of those with macro-metastases; 17.8% (18/101) of the patients with micro-metastases and 10.2% (4/39) of the "positive but inhibited" group.

CONCLUSION

In our series over a third of our patients had positive lymph nodes detected with OSNA allowing them to proceed directly to axillary surgery at the same operation. This technique eliminates the need for a second operation in sentinel lymph node positive patients and avoids the anxiety waiting for histological results.

Utility of intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative frozen section (IFS) examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) is useful in selecting patients with invasive breast cancer for immediate axillary lymph node dissection. However, whether IFS evaluation of the SLNs in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has any value has not been previously assessed.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic data from patients with DCIS who underwent resection with SLN biopsy (2004-2010) were collected to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of IFS, and its impact on axillary management.

RESULTS

A total of 267 patients with DCIS underwent resection with SLN biopsy and IFS evaluation. Preoperative pathology was DCIS (n = 231), DCIS with microinvasion (n = 24), and DCIS with other lesions (n = 12). Fifty-two (19.5%) patients had invasive breast cancer on final pathology. SLN metastases were identified in 13 (4.8%) patients; however, only 4 (1.5%) were IFS positive. IFS examination was negative in 263 (98.5%) patients. Among patients with SLN metastases, the most common pattern of metastases was either micrometastasis (n = 6) or immunohistochemistry-positive individual tumor cells (n = 4), whereas 3 patients had a macrometastasis. IFS examination was falsely negative in 9 of these 13 patients for a false-negative rate of 69.3%, and a sensitivity and specificity of 31% and 100% respectively. Nine of the 13 patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection and only 1 patient had further axillary metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

SLN metastases in DCIS is rare and most commonly involves SLN micrometastasis or immunohistochemistry-positive individual tumor cells. SLN IFS evaluation in DCIS has a low yield and sensitivity, and can be safely omitted to reduce operative duration and cost.

Ductal carcinoma in situ: how should we treat it?

SUMMARY The observed incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased because of the increasing use of sensitive imaging modalities. While the clinical course of DCIS is quite variable, it is considered a precursor lesion to invasive breast cancer. The current focus of DCIS treatment is on the prevention of progression to invasive disease. However, at present, validated diagnostic tests to predict progression accurately are lacking. Additionally, important clinical questions arise during DCIS management. For example, optimal margins of excision or axillary lymph node sampling have not been addressed in randomized clinical trials. May whole-breast radiation after lumpectomy be omitted in selected patients? What is the role of adjuvant tamoxifen if it does not impact overall survival rates? This review aims to describe the natural history of DCIS and highlights the current therapeutic options and challenges in patient management.

Detection of occult invasion in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with sentinel node metastasis

By definition, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) - pre-invasive breast cancer - does not metastasize to the lymph nodes. However, since the introduction of molecular whole-node analysis using the one-step nucleic acid amplification assay for sentinel node (SN) biopsies, the number of patients with DCIS and SN metastasis has increased. The pathogenesis and clinical management of DCIS with SN metastasis remain controversial. In this case-control study, in order to elucidate the pathogenesis of SN metastasis in DCIS, we compared occult invasions between the SN-positive and SN-negative DCIS and investigated predictive factors of occult invasion. The subjects were 24 patients selected from 285 patients with a routine postoperative diagnosis of DCIS who had undergone SN biopsy using the one-step nucleic acid amplification whole-node assay between 2009 and 2011. Of these 24 patients, 12 were SN-positive, and 12 were SN-negative. The 12 SN-negative patients make up the control group and were selected from the 273 SN-negative patients based on patient characteristics. All paraffin blocks of the primary tumor from each patient were step-sectioned with 500-μm intervals until the block was exhausted and histopathologically examined. We analyzed 1830 step-sectioned slides and found occult invasions were more frequent in the SN-positive group (7/12, 58.3%) than in the SN-negative group (3/12, 25.0%). All occult invasions were <5 mm. There was no correlation between occult invasion and SN tumor burden, non-SN metastasis, or patient characteristics. Our results suggest true metastasis from occult invasion may be a potent pathogenesis indicating nodal metastasis in postoperatively diagnosed DCIS. Patient follow-up is required to elucidate the prognostic impact of nodal metastasis and occult invasion.

Risk predictors of underestimation and the need for sentinel node biopsy in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ by preoperative needle biopsy

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by core needle biopsy showed a high rate of underestimation of invasiveness, and performing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in DCIS patients was controversial.

METHODS

We analyzed 340 DCIS patients who were diagnosed by needle biopsies. Final pathology and clinicopathological features were reviewed. Predictors were accessed using the Chi-square test and a binary logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The overall DCIS underestimation rate was 42.6%. The underestimation was significantly related to the palpability, mass or calcification by ultrasonography, grade, suspicious microinvasion, and biopsy method in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, palpability, ultrasonographic calcification or mass, suspicious microinvasion, and core needle biopsy were independent predictors of underestimation of invasive cancer. In cases with one or no risk predictors, the underestimation rate was 14.3%, whereas, in those with five predictors, it increased to 90.9%. Among 144 invasive cancer patients who underwent axillary staging, 15.4% had node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

DCIS diagnosed by preoperative needle biopsy has a high probability of underestimation, and 15% of invasive cancer patients have node metastasis. SLNB may be justified in DCIS patients undergoing needle biopsies, and caution should be exercised in omitting SLNB in patients with one or no risk predictors.

[Predictive factors of invasion with initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ based on core biopsy]

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies suggest that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) should not be performed in case of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) routinely. In order to avoid a second operation for invasive cancer detected postoperatively the chance of invasion need to be determined preoperatively. The purpose of our retrospective study was to evaluate the sensitivity of core biopsy and determine the predictive value of clinical and histological factors of invasion in cases when DCIS diagnosed preoperatively.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between January 2006 and December 2011, 1311 patients were treated for breast cancer in our institute, of whom preoperative core biopsy showed DCIS in 50 cases. Wide excision or quadrantectomy was performed in 41 cases, re-excision was necessary in 6 cases for positive surgical margins and mastectomy was carried out in four patients for multicentricity. In further 9 cases extensive tumour size indicated mastectomy straight away. SLNB was carried out in 31 patients, axillary block dissection (ABD) in 8 patients, while ABD for positive sentinel nodes in another two cases. Pathology showed invasion in 17 (34,7 %) cases.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed that tumour grade, symptomatic disease, patients' age were significant predictors of invasion. Although preoperative tumour size also showed correlation with invasiveness, this was statistically not significant.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of a larger patient population might be helpful to identify women who should undergo tumour excision and SLNB as a single step operation due to increased risk of invasive disease despite the preoperative diagnosis of DCIS.

Incidence and possible pathogenesis of sentinel node micrometastases in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast detected using molecular whole lymph node assay

Background:

The pathogenesis of lymph node metastases in preinvasive breast cancer – ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) – remains controversial. The one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay is a novel molecular method that can assess a whole node and detect clinically relevant metastases. In this retrospective cohort study, we determined the performance of the OSNA assay in DCIS and the pathogenesis of node-positive DCIS.

Methods:

The subjects consisted of 623 patients with DCIS who underwent sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy. Of these, 2-mm-sectioned nodes were examined using frozen-section (FS) histology in 338 patients between 2007 and 2009, while 285 underwent OSNA whole node assays between 2009 and 2011. The SN-positivity rate was compared between cohorts, and the characteristics of OSNA-positive DCIS were investigated.

Results:

The OSNA detected more cases of SN metastases than FS histology (12 out of 285, 4.2% vs 1 out of 338, 0.3%). Most of the metastases were micrometastases. The characteristics of high-risk DCIS (i.e., mass formation, size, grade, and comedo) and preoperative breast biopsy (i.e., methods or time to surgery) were not valid for OSNA assay–positive DCIS.

Conclusion:

The OSNA detects more SN metastases in DCIS than FS histology. Further examination of the primary tumours and follow-up of node-positive DCIS are needed to elucidate the pathogenesis.

Should axillary ultrasound be used in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ?

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the usefulness of axillary ultrasound (US) in patients with core biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

METHODS

Preoperative axillary US, fine-needle aspiration (FNA), and sentinel lymph node (SLN) data from women with DCIS were reviewed.

RESULTS

Eighty-two women with DCIS underwent axillary US. In 16 women (19.5%) US was abnormal; however, FNA was negative in all cases. Sixty-one women (74%) underwent SLN surgery; 2 were positive for macrometastasis (3%) and 1 had isolated tumor cells. None of them had an abnormal US. Axillary US did not change the management in any of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary US and FNA did not change the management in any of the 82 cases. In women with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS, positive nodes are uncommon and unlikely to be detected by axillary US. Routine preoperative axillary US is not recommended for pure DCIS on core biopsy.

MRI of the breast in patients with DCIS to exclude the presence of invasive disease

OBJECTIVES

Core biopsy underestimates invasion in more than 20% of patients with preoperatively diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) without evidence of invasion (pure DCIS). The aim of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to discriminate between patients with DCIS who are at high risk of invasive breast cancer and patients at low risk.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-five patients, preoperatively diagnosed with pure DCIS (128 lesions; 3 bilateral) by core-needle biopsy, were prospectively included. Clinical, mammographic, histological (core biopsy) and MRI features were assessed. All patients underwent breast surgery. Analyses were performed to identify features associated with presence of invasion.

RESULTS

Eighteen lesions (14.1%) showed invasion on final histology. Seventy-three lesions (57%) showed suspicious enhancement on MRI with a type 1 (n = 12, 16.4%), type 2 (n = 19, 26.0%) or type 3 curve, respectively (n = 42, 57.5%). At multivariate analysis, the most predictive features for excluding presence of invasive disease were absence of enhancement or a type 1 curve on MRI (negative predictive value 98.5%; A(Z) 0.80, P = 0.00006).

CONCLUSION

Contrast medium uptake kinetics at MRI provide high negative predictive value to exclude presence of invasion and may be useful in primary surgical planning in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of pure DCIS.

KEY POINTS

It is important to determine invasion in breast DCIS. • MRI contrast medium uptake kinetics can help exclude the presence of invasion. • However, the positive predictive value for the presence of invasion is limited. • MRI features were more accurate at predicting invasion than mammographic features alone.

Routine clinical use of the one-step nucleic acid amplification assay for detection of sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients: results of a multicenter study in Japan

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to confirm, by means of a multicenter study conducted in Japan, the reliability and usefulness of the one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay in routine clinical use for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) of breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Patients with Tis-T2N0M0 breast cancer who underwent SLNB before systemic chemotherapy comprised the study cohort. A whole sentinel lymph node (SLN) was examined intraoperatively with the OSNA assay except for a 1-mm-thick, central slice of the lymph node, which underwent pathologic examination after the operation. For patients who underwent axillary dissection, non-SLNs were examined with routine pathologic examination.

RESULTS

In total, 417 SLNBs from 413 patients were analyzed. SLN metastases were detected with greater sensitivity by the OSNA assay than by pathologic examination (22.5% vs 15.8%; P < .001), as expected from the difference in size of the specimens examined. Patients who had SLN metastases assessed with the OSNA assay proved to harbor non-SLN metastases with an overall risk ratio of 33.7%. The risk of non-SLN metastasis was significantly lower for patients who had positive SLNs assessed as OSNA+ than for those who had SLNs assessed as OSNA++ (17.6% vs 44%; P = .012).

CONCLUSIONS

The OSNA assay can be used for routine clinical SLNB, and its assessment for volume of metastasis may be a powerful predictive factor for non-SLN metastasis. Further studies with more patients are needed to confirm the usefulness of this assay for selection in the clinical setting of patients who do not need axillary dissection.