Prognostic value of subclassification of T2 tumours in patients with gastric cancer

Deep muscularis propria tumor invasion without lymph node metastasis as a unique subclassification of stage IB gastric cancer: a retrospective study

Background

The prognosis difference based on the depth of tumor muscularis propria invasion in gastric cancer (GC) was still debated, and therapy strategy for stage IB GC patient required further investigation.

Methods

A total of 380 patients with pT2 GC after radical surgery were retrospectively analyzed, including 185 in superficial muscularis propria (sMP) group and 195 in deep muscularis propria (dMP) group.

Results

The overall survival (OS) was significantly better for patients in sMP group than for patients in dMP group (P = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, depth of tumor invasion, pN stage, age, primary location, positive expression of p53, elevated maximal LDH, elevated initial CA19-9 and AFP level were independent prognostic factors for OS. The sMP group had a significantly better OS than dMP group (P = 0.014) in pN0 stage. After further stratification, the survival outcomes were not significantly different between deep muscularis propria tumor invasion without lymph node metastasis (dMPN0) group (stage IB) and superficial muscularis propria tumor invasion with stage 1–2 lymph node metastasis (sMPN1–2) group (stage II) (P = 0.100). Patients with adjuvant chemotherapy had a statistically better survival than those without in dMPN0 group (P = 0.045) and dMPN0 patients with adjuvant chemotherapy had better OS than sMPN1–2 patients (P = 0.015). In addition, greater postoperative survival could be observed in sMPN0 patients than dMPN0 patients in p53-positive group (P = 0.002), and similar OS could be seen between dMPN0 patients with p53-positive and T2N1–2 patients (P = 0.872).

Conclusion

As a unique subclassification of stage IB GC, appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered for patients with dMPN0 stage. In addition, positive expression of p53, elevated LDH could be potential factors in identifying the different prognoses for stage IB GC patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-02090-z.

HER2, NF-κB, and SATB1 Expression Patterns in Gastric Cancer and Their Correlation with Clinical and Pathological Parameters

Gastric cancer (GC) is currently recognized as one of the most common and fatal tumor worldwide. The identification of novel biomarkers in relation to clinical information as well as extending the knowledge on a multiple crosstalk between various oncogenic pathways implicated in GC carcinogenesis seems pivotal to limit the disease-associated mortality. Therefore, we assessed the expression of HER2, NF-κB, and SATB1 in a total of 104 gastric adenocarcinomas and 30 normal gastric samples and correlated the expression patterns with each other and with some clinicopathological variables. Protein expression was examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tissue microarrays (TMAs), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was employed to detect HER2 amplification. In the studied group, HER2 and SATB1 were found to be overexpressed in gastric cancer tissue in comparison to normal gastric mucosa. The expression status of the former protein was seen to differ according to some clinicopathological features, but without statistical significance, whereas the expression of the latter was not importantly associated with any of them. In turn, the NF-κB protein level was significantly related to the presence of lymph node metastasis. HER2 expression was not significantly correlated with that of other proteins, but a positive correlation was found between the expression of SATB1 and NF-κB. Further studies with a larger group of patients combined with in vitro mechanistic experiments are required to fully elucidate the role and relationship of HER2, NF-κB, and SATB1 expression in gastric cancer progression. However, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first look at a simultaneous evaluation of these three markers in the samples of gastric cancer patients.

Does Noncompliance in Lymph Node Dissection Affect Oncological Efficacy in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy?

BACKGROUND

Few reports have examined the prognosis of or possible remedial treatments for patients with noncompliant D2 lymphadenectomy. We investigated the effect of noncompliance in lymph node (LN) dissection on long-term survival in gastric cancer (GC) patients after radical gastrectomy and explored intervention measures.

METHODS

Clinicopathological data were retrospectively analyzed in 2401 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for GC. Noncompliance was defined as patients with more than one empty LN station, as described in the protocol of the Japanese GC Association.

RESULTS

The overall noncompliance rate was 49.1%. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly better in compliant than noncompliant patients (74.0% vs. 60.1%, P < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that noncompliance was an independent risk factor for OS. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that extent of gastrectomy, primary tumor site, history of intraperitoneal surgery, body mass index, and open gastrectomy were independent preoperative predictive factors for noncompliance. Cox analysis demonstrated that age, pT, pN, and extent of gastrectomy independently affected OS in patients with noncompliant lymphadenectomy. However, OS was significantly better in the compliant than noncompliant group regardless of the recommendation for chemotherapy. Stratified analysis demonstrated that OS was significantly better in chemotherapy patients than in patients without chemotherapy and stage II patients (pT1N2/N3M0 and pT3N0M0) in whom chemotherapy was not recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Noncompliance is an independent risk factor after radical gastrectomy for GC. Adjuvant chemotherapy improved the prognosis of patients with pT1N2/N3M0 and pT3N0M0 disease who underwent noncompliant D2 lymphadenectomy.

Satisfactory surgical outcome of T2 gastric cancer after modified D2 lymphadenectomy

Objective

Though D2 lymphadenectomy has been increasingly regarded as standard surgical procedure for advanced gastric cancer (GC), the modified D2 (D1 + 7, 8a and 9) lymphadenectomy may be more suitable than D2 dissection for T2 stage GC. The purpose of this study is to elucidate whether the surgical outcome of modified D2 lymphadenectomy was comparable to that of standard D2 dissection in T2 stage GC patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study with 77 cases and 77 controls matched for baseline characteristics was conducted. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the extent of lymphadenectomy: the modified D2 group (mD2) and the standard D2 group (D2). Surgical outcome and recurrence date were compared between the two groups.

Results

The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 71.4% for patients accepted mD2 lymphadenectomy and 70.1% for those accepted standard D2, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant. Multivariate survival analysis revealed that curability, tumor size, TNM stage and postoperative complications were independently prognostic factors for T2 stage GC patients. Patients in the mD2 group tended to have less intraoperative blood loss (P=0.001) and shorter operation time (P<0.001) than those in the D2 group. While there were no significant differences in recurrence rate and types, especially lymph node recurrence, between the two groups.

Conclusions

The surgical outcome of mD2 lymphadenectomy was equal to that of standard D2, and the use of mD2 instead of standard D2 can be a better option for T2 stage GC.

Impact of clinical tumor-node-metastasis staging on survival in gastric carcinoma patients receiving surgery

BACKGROUND

Preoperative clinical staging of gastric cancer is used to determine therapeutic strategies. However, the impact of the clinical stage on survival has not been completely investigated, although the relationship between pathologic staging and survival outcome has been reported. The aim of the present study was to clarify the predictability of patient survival based on clinical staging and to evaluate the usefulness of staging as an indicator for selecting the treatment modality.

METHODS

A total of 3033 patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer were included. A survival analysis was conducted based on the seventh edition of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) clinical staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. The predictive ability of the TNM clinical stage for survival was evaluated by Harrell's C-index, a measure of the separation of survival distributions.

RESULTS

The cumulative 5-year survival rates according to the clinical stage were 94.3 % (IA), 84.7 % (IB), 71.7 % (IIA), 56.1 % (IIB), 55.7 % (IIIA), 42.3 % (IIIB), 22.8 % (IIIC), and 9.1 % (IV). Although no significant difference was observed between clinical stages IIB and IIIA (p = 0.865), significant differences existed between all other clinical stages (p < 0.001). Harrell's C-index applied to these results was 0.825 (95 % confidence interval 0.819-0.831).

CONCLUSIONS

The seventh edition of the TNM clinical staging system has a strong prognostic ability with a satisfactory C-index and should be considered valuable for selecting therapeutic strategies for the treatment of gastric cancer.

Prognostic factors for survival in patients with pT1 N+ or T2–3 N0 gastric cancer in Japan

Background

The outcome for pT1 N+ or pT2–3 N0 gastric cancer is favourable, but some patients suffer from recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors in patients with pT1 N+ or pT2–3 N0 gastric cancer.

Methods

This was a multicentre, retrospective cohort study. All patients with pT1 N+ or pT2–3 N0 gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy at five high-volume, specialized cancer centres in Japan between 2000 and 2008 were included. Demographic, clinical, surgical and pathological data were collected. Independent prognostic factors were identified using a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Results

Some 1442 patients were included. The 5-year overall survival rate for patients with pT1 N+ or pT2–3 N0 gastric cancer was 92·0 per cent. Multivariable analysis for overall survival identified age (hazard ratio (HR) 2·67, 95 per cent c.i. 2·09 to 3·43), sex (HR 0·57, 0·39 to 0·83) and clinical tumour depth (cT) (HR 1·45, 1·06 to 1·98) as independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion

Survival of patients with pT1 N+ or pT2–3 N0 gastric cancer is good. Age 65 years or above, male sex and cT2-4 category are associated with worse overall survival.

Comparison between superficial muscularis propria and deep muscularis propria infiltration in gastric cancer patients: A retrospective cohort study

This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of the subclassification of pT2 gastric cancers according to the depth of tumor involvement. We retrospectively collected clinicopathological data and survival outcomes for pT2 gastric cancer patients from 2006 to 2011. Patients were classified into the superficial muscularis propria (sMP) and deep muscularis propria (dMP) groups. Eighty-nine patients had sMP gastric cancers and 90 patients had dMP gastric cancers. The rates of lymph node metastasis for the sMP and dMP groups were 55.1% and 64.4%, respectively, P = 0.202. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients in the sMP group was significantly better than patients in the dMP group (76% vs 61%, P = 0.018). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, and postoperative chemotherapy were prognostic risk factors for the OS. For patients with pN0 stage tumor(s), the sMP group had a significantly better 5-year OS rate than the dMP group (92% vs 62%, P = 0.004); for patients with pN1-N3 stages, the 5-year OS rates were comparable between the sMP and dMP groups (64% vs 61%, P = 0.540). The subclassification of pT2 gastric cancer into the sMP and dMP groups can demonstrate different survival outcomes according to the lymph node status. However, the pT2 stage subclassification in the next tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system is pending and requires more large sample size studies to confirm its importance.

Analysis of lymph node metastasis correlation with prognosis in patients with T2 gastric cancer

Purpose

To investigate the correlated factors for lymph node metastasis and prognosis for patients with T2 gastric cancer.

Methods

A total of 442 patients with T2 gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy from January 1996 to December 2009 were evaluated. The clinicopathological parameters were analyzed for lymph node metastasis and prognosis, including gender, age, tumor size, tumor location, histological type, depth of invasion, vascular tumor emboli, nervous invasion, resection type, and pathological stage.

Results

The rate of lymph node metastasis was 45.9%. Univariate analysis showed that depth of invasion, tumor size, and vascular tumor emboli were associated with lymph node metastasis. Logistic regression demonstrated that depth of invasion, tumor size, and vascular tumor emboli were independently predictive factors for lymph node metastasis. The 5-year survival rate was 64.0%. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, tumor location, resection type, and pathological stage were independent prognostic factors. Based on tumor size, there were significant differences of 5-year survival between small size tumor (<6 cm) and large size tumor (≥6 cm) according to stage IIA (P = 0.006). Based on tumor location, there were significant differences of 5-year survival among different tumor location according to stage IB. Based on resection type, there were significant differences of overall 5-year survival between curative surgery and palliative surgery according to stage IIB (P = 0.015) and IIIA (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Depth of invasion, tumor size, and vascular tumor emboli were independently predictive factors for lymph node metastasis. Tumor size, tumor location, resection type, and pathological stage were independent prognostic factors.

Sixth and seventh tumor-node-metastasis staging system compared in gastric cancer patients

AIM: To investigate the clinical relevance and prognosis regarding survival according to the changes of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) in gastric cancer patients.

METHODS: We retrospectively studied 347 consecutive subjects who underwent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma at the Division of General Surgery, Hospital of Busto Arsizio, Busto Arsizio, Italy between June 1998 and December 2009. Patients who underwent surgery without curative intent, patients with tumors of the gastric stump and patients with tumors involving the esophagus were excluded for survival analysis. Patients were staged according to the 6^th and 7^th edition TNM criteria; 5-year overall survival rates were investigated, and the event was defined as death from any cause.

RESULTS: After exclusion, our study population included 241 resected patients with curative intent for gastric adenocarcinoma. The 5-year overall survival (5-year OS) rate of all the patients was 52.8%. The diagnosed stage differed in 32% of 241 patients based on the TNM edition used for the diagnosis. The patients in stage II according to the 6^th edition who were reclassified as stage III had significantly worse prognosis than patients classified as stage II (5-year OS, 39% vs 71%). According to the 6^th edition, 135 patients were classifed as T2, and 75% of these patients migrated to T3 and exhibited a significantly worse prognosis than those who remained T2, regardless of lymph node involvement (37% vs 71%). The new N1 patients exhibited a better prognosis than the previous N1 patients (67% vs 43%).

CONCLUSION: 7^th TNM allows new T2 and N1 patients to be selected with better prognosis, which leads to different staging. New stratification is important in multimodal therapy.

Gastric cancer staging with radiologic imaging modalities and UICC staging system

There are two major stage classification systems for gastric cancer: the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stages by the International Union against Cancer (UICC) and the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA). Preoperative stage classification using either of these systems is essential for deciding on the treatment strategy in the era of various multimodal therapeutic options. Evolution of multidetector computerized tomography with isotropic volumetric imaging and various 3D images has increased the accuracy of T and N staging in patients with gastric cancer, although detection of peritoneal deposits and nodal metastasis in the absence of lymphadenopathy remain problematic with the imaging tools currently available. The TNM and JGCA classifications have undergone revisions independent of each other, and the discrepancies were not helpful when international comparisons and cooperation were needed. More recently, the JGCA and TNM classifications were merged to have identical T and N categories, in addition to the more straightforward M categories that indicate the presence of distant metastasis. The result of these efforts is that researchers in Japan and the rest of the world are now looking at a similar disease when they discuss cancer that belongs to the same stage. A nomogram that incorporates other established prognostic determinants in addition to the TNM component may be a future direction for a more sophisticated means of predicting outcome. The increasing incidence of junctional (esophagogastric junction) cancer in the Far East has spurred researchers from this region to adequately stage the disease and to consider suitable treatment modalities for this disease entity, whereas Western researchers are more inclined to treat this disease as esophageal cancer. This could be an area for future international debate. For the next more accurate staging, we suggest the collaboration between Eastern and Western high-volume centers in gastric cancer because the inconsistency of surgical approaches, especially with respect to nodal resection, remains a barrier to mutual understanding.

Prognostic value of the seventh AJCC/UICC TNM classification of non-cardia gastric cancer

Background

The TNM staging criteria for gastric carcinoma have seen numerous revisions, the most recent of which are reflected in the seventh edition AJCC TNM cancer staging manual.

Methods

A retrospective evaluation of the sixth and seventh TNM classification of gastric cancer on a prospective database, regarding patients operated on for primary gastric cancer, was conducted. The end point of the study was prognosis evaluation in terms of overall survival.

Patients operated on for primary gastric cancer between September 2003 and March 2012 at our Department of Emergency and General Surgery, were consecutively retrieved in this study; a total of 114 patients were considered. Cardia gastric cancers, gastric lymphomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) were excluded. Median and mean follow-up periods were 22.5 and 27.7 months (range 15 days to 5 years). Both TNM6 and TNM7 were used to evaluate our patients. Overall survival and survival rates at different stages were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences were determined using a log-rank test. Cox’s proportional hazard model was used to identify significant factors related to prognosis in a multivariate analysis.

Results

Overall survival between the sixth and seventh TNM classification was not significantly different. Both the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the multivariate analysis showed that the major negative prognostic factor was lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001 in the univariate analysis and P = 0.035 to 0.048 in the multivariate analysis). Stage distribution and stage-related survival changed from the sixth to the seventh edition, especially in T3 stage where median survival for the sixth edition was 720 days versus 1,200 days for the seventh edition. Moreover, differences were shown in the survival rate of N1 versus N2 stages within the seventh TNM.

Conclusions

Even though further studies are needed in order to increase the number of patients studied, the seventh edition seems to provide a more accurate prognosis, especially regarding N1 and N2 tumors, showing that the most important prognostic factor is lymphovascular invasion.

Discussion of modifying stage IV gastric cancer based on Borrmann classification

This study aims to investigate the prognostic significance of reclassification of stage IV gastric cancers in conjunction with Borrmann type. A total of 1,673 gastric cancer patients who received a gastrectomy between 1980 and 2003 were retrospectively evaluated. Of the patients, 244 (14.58 %), 344 (20.56 %), 589 (35.21 %), and 496 (29.65 %) had stage I, II, III, and IV cancers, respectively. After Cox regression analysis, Borrmann type was identified to be the independent prognostic factor in stage IV gastric cancer. The disease-specific postoperative survival of patients with Borrmann I, II, and III tumors was clearly distinguished by TNM classification system (P<0.05), while it failed to classify Borrmann IV tumors (P=0.147). Interestingly, the disease-specific postoperative survival of stage IV patients with Borrmann IV tumors (group 1) was significantly poor than the cases with stage IV but not Borrmann IV tumors (group 2), as well as the patients with Borrmann IV while not included in stage IV tumors (group 3) (P=0.022 and P=0.000, respectively). Meanwhile, the disease-specific postoperative survival was not observed as significantly different between group 2 and group 3 (P=0.063); furthermore, group 2+3 had a better prognosis than group 1 (introduced stage IVa vs. stage IVb; P=0.006). Reclassification of stage IV through combining the present TNM classification system with Borrmann type may more accurately predict the prognosis of patients.

Lymphatic vascular invasion is an independent correlated factor for lymph node metastasis and the prognosis of resectable T2 gastric cancer patients

The objective of this study was to investigate the independent correlated factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) and prognosis in T2 gastric cancer patients. A total of 135 pathologically confirmed T2 gastric cancer patients who received a gastrectomy at the Beijing University Cancer Hospital from Dec 1999 to Dec 2006 were studied retrospectively. The potential correlated factors for LNM and patients' prognosis were analyzed, including gender, age, tumor location and size, depth of invasion, lymphatic vascular invasion (LVI), differentiation grade, histological type, Borrmann type, LNM, distant metastasis, TNM stage, and whether the patient was treated with a radical gastrectomy. LNM occurred in 69 patients, which represents a rate of LNM of 51.1 %. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that LVI and TNM stage were independent risk factors for LNM (p values were 0.002 and 0.029, respectively). The median follow-up time was 60.3 months. Multivariable survival analysis revealed that age (<60 vs. ≥ 60), TNM stage and LVI were independent prognostic factors for gastric cancer patients (p values were <0.001, 0.047, and 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, LVI was an independent factor for LNM and the prognosis of resectable T2 gastric cancer patients.

Comparação da sobrevivência e dos fatores prognósticos em pacientes com adenocarcinoma gástrico T2 e T3

OBJETIVO: Comparar a sobrevivência e os fatores prognósticos, após o tratamento cirúrgico de pacientes com adenocarcinoma gástrico que compromete a camada muscular própria (T2), e de pacientes cujo tumor invade a subserosa (T3). MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo de 122 pacientes com câncer gástrico invadindo a muscular própria e subserosa, submetidos ao tratamento cirúrgico no período de janeiro de 1997 a dezembro de 2008 e acompanhados até dezembro de 2010. Foram analisadas variáveis demográficas, cirúrgicas e anatomopatológicas. RESULTADOS: Dos 122 pacientes, 22 (18%) foram excluídos da análise final porque apresentaram: margem positiva, mortalidade pós-operatória, segundo tumor primário e menos de 15 linfonodos na peça cirúrgica. Entre os 100 pacientes incluídos, 75 apresentavam tumores com invasão da muscular própria (T2) e 25 com invasão da subserosa (T3). A sobrevivência global foi 83,8%, sendo 90,6% no T2 e 52,1% no T3. Na análise univariada apresentaram significância: metástase linfonodal (p=0,02), tamanho do tumor (p=0,000), estadiamento patológico do tumor (p=0,000), estadiamento patológico linfonodal (p=0,000) e estadiamento por grupos da classificação TNM-UICC/AJCC, 2010 (p=0,000) Na análise multivariada, os fatores prognósticos independentes foram o tamanho do tumor e o estadiamento patológico linfonodal (pN). CONCLUSÃO: O comprometimento linfonodal e o tamanho do tumor são fatores prognósticos independentes nos tumores com invasão da muscular própria e nos tumores com invasão da subserosa. O T2 apresenta menor tamanho, menor taxa de linfonodos metastáticos e consequentemente, melhor prognóstico que o T3.

Comparison of the survival difference between AJCC 6th and 7th editions for gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The AJCC 7th edition changes the classification of T- and N-factors and the TNM stage of gastric cancer. We evaluated its prognostic impact.

METHODS

From December 1987 to December 2006, a total of 1,380 patients underwent curative surgery for gastric cancer at the Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, with a retrieved lymph node number ≥ 15. Survival was compared for disease classified according to the AJCC 6th and 7th editions.

RESULTS

There is a significant difference in 5-year survival between T2 and T3 gastric cancer classified according to the AJCC 7th edition (75.2 vs. 54.9%, p < 0.001), as well as between N1 and N2 (71.4 vs. 44.1%, p < 0.001). Although patients with N3a had a better 5-year survival than did those with N3b (27.6 vs. 11.3%, p < 0.001), the N3 categories were combined and not applied in the TNM stage in the 7th edition. Multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards model with a forward logistics regression stepwise procedure demonstrates that age, N category of 6th edition, and T and N categories of 7th edition are independent prognostic factors; however, T category of 6th edition is no longer significant. Furthermore, the discriminative power of survival difference between each TNM stage seems to be comparable between the 6th and 7th editions.

CONCLUSIONS

The AJCC 7th edition provides a more stratified survival difference in staging of gastric cancer. Future division of N3a and N3b in the classification of the TNM stage is recommended.

Evaluation of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results from a Chinese monoinstitutional study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the validity of the 7th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system for gastric cancer with special attention paid to pT2/pT3, pN1/pN2, and pN3a/pN3b category.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinicopathologic data of 1998 patients underwent R0 surgery for histologically proven gastric cancers with >15 lymph nodes retrieved were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Prognoses were significantly different between pT2 and pT3 categories, between pN1 and pN2 categories, or between pN3a and pN3b categories. Each stage in the 6th edition was divided into the 7th edition stage with different survival rates. Moreover, stage IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC in the 7th edition system was divided into the 6th edition stage with different survival rates. Prognoses for patients in 7th edition T4aN1M0/T3N2M0/T2N3aM0, T4bN0-1M0/T4aN2M0/T3N3aM0, and T4aN3aM0/T4bN2M0 were similar to that of patients in T1N3bM0, T2N3bM0, and T3N3bM0, respectively, but significantly better than that of patients in T2N3bM0, T3N3bM0, and T4aN3bM0, respectively. However, no significant difference could be observed among patients in T4bN3aM0, T4aN3bM0, T4bN3bM0, and stage IV. A revised TNM system was proposed, in which T1N3bM0 was incorporated into stage IIIA, T2N3bM0 into stage IIIB, T3N3bM0 into stage IIIC, T4bN3aM0/T4aN3bM0/T4bN3bM0 into stage IV. Further analyses revealed the revised TNM system had better homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity of gradients than the 6th and the 7th edition system.

CONCLUSIONS

It is reasonable to subclassify the 6th edition pT2 category and pN1 category into the 7th edition pT2/pT3 category and pN1/pN2 category, respectively. However, for better prognostic stratification, it might be more suitable for pN3a and pN3b categories to be considered individual determinants of the 7th edition TNM staging system.

Validation of the updated 7th edition AJCC TNM staging criteria for gastric adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The recently published 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging criteria for gastric adenocarcinoma contains important revisions to T and N classifications, as well as overall stage grouping. Our goal was to validate the new staging system using a cancer registry.

METHODS

Retrospective review of gastric cancer patients from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data (2004-2007). Patients were staged according to both 6th and 7th edition criteria, and 3-year disease-specific survival was compared.

RESULTS

Thirteen thousand five hundred forty-seven patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were identified with complete staging information. When using 7th edition criteria, there was an increase in the number of patients classified as stage III (23% vs. 13%), and a decrease in patients classified as stage IV (47% vs. 53%). Statistically significant differences in 3-year disease-specific survival were observed for all T and N categories and re-staging the same population according to the 7th edition criteria improved survival discrimination. Multivariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences in survival and linear progression of hazard ratios for each stage grouping.

CONCLUSIONS

The 7th edition AJCC staging criteria for gastric adenocarcinoma demonstrate better survival discrimination and risk stratification than previous criteria.

Is subdivision of pT2 tumors superior to lymph node metastasis for predicting survival of patients with gastric cancer? Review of 224 patients from four centers

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of the subclassification of pT2 tumors and the association of these categories with other clinicopathological factors in gastric cancer patients were investigated.

METHODS

A total of 224 patients with pT2 gastric cancer who had undergone curative gastrectomy and lymph node dissection were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic role of the subclassification of pT2 tumors was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of 224 patients, 75 (33.5%) were classified as having pT2a tumors and 149 (66.5%) as having pT2b tumors. The prevalence of large-sized tumors (P < 0.003), lymph node involvement (P < 0.018), and lymphatic (P = 0.016), blood vessel (P = 0.001), and perineural invasion (P = 0.001) was significantly higher for pT2b tumors than for pT2a tumors. The rate of recurrence for pT2a cancers was significantly lower than that for pT2b cancers (P = 0.001).Median overall survival (OS) times and three-year OS of patients with a pT2b tumor were significantly worse than for patients with a pT2a tumor (P < 0.001).When patients were analyzed according to lymph node involvement, the prognosis of patients with pT2aN(1) cancers was significantly better than that of patients with pT2bN(1) (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that the pT2 subdivision was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.006), as were pN stage, clinical stage, and recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that subclassification of pT2 tumors into pT2a or pT2b was an important prognostic indicator for patients with pT2 gastric cancers who underwent curative gastrectomy. In the TNM staging system, subdivision of pT2 tumors should be undertaken routinely to detect gastric cancer patients who have a poor prognosis and to define patients more accurately in terms of their mortality after curative resection in accordance with the new 2010 AJCC TNM staging classification. This may also help as a guide to more appropriate therapy for tumors with subserosal invasion (old pT2b or new pT3).

Validation of the new AJCC TNM staging system for gastric cancer in a large cohort of patients (n = 2,155): focus on the T category

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of T subclassification in patients with gastric carcinoma has been just implemented in the new AJCC TNM staging system, which has reclassified T2a and T2b into T2 and T3 tumors, respectively. The aim of the present study was to validate the prognostic significance of the new T categorization within the frame of the latest TNM staging system.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 686 T2/T3 patients among 2155 subjects who underwent radical resection for gastric carcinoma at six Italian centers from 1988 through 2006.

RESULTS

Upon multivariate analysis, the new T categories, extent of lymph node dissection (D) and patient's age were retained by the survival model as independent prognostic factors. In particular, the death risk for patients with T3 tumors was higher than that of patients with T2 tumors (HR: 1.42, P = 0.005). Among the 686 patients previously classified as having T2 tumors, patients with T2 and T3 disease were 270 (39.4%) and 416 (60.6%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 55 months, the 5-year overall survival rates were 67.3% and 52.3% for patients with T2 and T3 tumors, respectively (P < 0.001). The survival advantage for the T2 as compared to T3 category was maintained even when N0 and N+ patients were separately considered (P = 0.0154 and P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm the prognostic difference between the newly proposed T2 and T3 categories, which should be implemented in the routine clinical practice to improve risk stratification of patients with gastric cancer.

Validation of seventh edition AJCC gastric cancer staging modifications

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The seventh edition of the AJCC has more detailed staging categories for gastric cancer than does the sixth edition. The aim of our study was to compare the prognostic accuracies of the sixth and seventh AJCC editions for gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

We analyzed survival rates by category using the sixth and seventh editions of the AJCC in 10,060 patients with gastric cancer who had undergone gastrectomy between 1994 and 2007 at Samsung Medical Center.

RESULTS

Significant differences in prognosis were seen when comparing the new stages of the seventh edition of the AJCC that are subgroups of stages IB, II, IIIA, and IV in the sixth edition. In particular, stage IV of the AJCC sixth edition is divided into stages IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC and IV in the seventh edition, and the 5-year survival rates of these respective stages were 80.2%, 45.3%, 23.5%, 17.2%, and 10.1% (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Each category of the AJCC sixth edition has been divided into multiple stages in the AJCC seventh edition, each with a different prognosis. The newly divided subgroups from AJCC sixth edition stage IV showed more accurate outcome classification based on AJCC seventh edition staging stratification.

Cohort study based on the seventh edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: proposal of a new staging system

PURPOSE

We investigated the effect of the new TNM classification on gastric cancer staging.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From hospital records, information from patients with gastric cancer, who had undergone either total or partial gastrectomy for adenocarcinomas of the stomach or esophagogastric junction, was retrieved. The pathologic TNM stage was determined according to the sixth and seventh editions of the International Union Against Cancer guidelines and was based on surgical pathologic examination.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-four patients (338 men and 216 women; median age, 68 years) had undergone partial or complete gastrectomy for intestinal (n = 209) or diffuse (n = 249) adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and stomach. Survival data and date of death were available for all patients. Patient death correlated significantly with age at diagnosis, tumor type, histologic grade, local tumor growth (T category), number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, lymph node status (N category), and tumor stage. No major difference was noted between the sixth and seventh editions of the TNM classification. On the basis of survival data, we revised the stage grouping system; stage I and II tumors were confined to nonmetastatic tumors, and stage III and IV tumors were confined to metastatic tumors. The Kaplan-Meier plots of this modified stage grouping showed statistically significant differences between individual stage subgroups without crossing curves and demonstrated improved survival of patients with stage II disease.

CONCLUSION

The seventh edition of the TNM classification is associated with a stage migration in 60% of patients with esophagogastric and stomach cancer. This change did not improve the assessment of patient prognosis, and therefore, a revised staging system is proposed.

Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM classification for gastric cancer was published in 2010 and included major revisions. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the validity of the seventh edition TNM classification for gastric cancer based on an Asian population.

METHODS

A total of 2916 gastric cancer patients who underwent R0 surgical resection from 1989 through 2008 in a single institute were included, and were analyzed according to the seventh edition of the TNM classification for validation.

RESULTS

When adjusted using the seventh edition of the TNM classification, upstaging was observed in 771 patients (26.4%) and downstaging was observed in 178 patients (6.1%) compared with the sixth edition of the TNM classification. The relative risk (RR) of seventh edition pT classification was found to be increased with regular intensity compared with the sixth edition pT classification. The RR of seventh edition pN classification was found to be increased with irregular intensity compared with the sixth edition pN classification. In survival analysis, there were significant differences noted for each stage of disease, but only a marginal difference was demonstrated between stage IA and stage IB (P = .049). In the hybrid TNM classification, which combines the seventh edition pT classification and the sixth edition pN classification, both pT and pN classifications demonstrated a more ideal distribution of the RR, and 5-year survival rates also showed a significant difference for each stage (P <.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The seventh edition of the TNM classification was considered valid based on the results of the current study. However, the hybrid TNM classification, comprised of a combination of the seventh edition pT classification and sixth edition pN classification, should be considered for the next edition.

Helicobacter pylori and clinical aspects of gastric cancer

In spite of important new insights into the basic mechanisms of gastric carcinogenesis, progress in the management of gastric cancer has been modest. Some modifications in the chemotherapies used for palliation and strategies for downstaging of the disease prior to surgical intervention are noteworthy. The positive experience with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and submucosal dissection (ESD) for treatment of early gastric cancer has been confirmed and extended. The procedure-related morbidity and post-interventional quality of life is clearly favorable compared to open surgical resection in well-selected patients. New data on Helicobacter pylori revealed that eradication after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer significantly reduces the incidence of recurrent and metachronous gastric neoplasias. It can further improve healing rates of treatment induced gastric ulcers. Eradication therapy therefore remains the best target for prevention of the disease. Critical is the "point of no return" when mucosal alterations (i.e. intestinal metaplasia, glandular atrophy) are no longer reversible. A population-based screen-and-eradicate strategy for H. pylori infection can at present only be recommended in high incidence regions.