1
|
Lazar DJ, Ferzli GS. Is the robotic revolution stunting surgical skills? Surg Open Sci 2024; 19:63-65. [PMID: 38595831 PMCID: PMC11002294 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
This perspective piece aims to examine the impact of the growing utilization of robotic platforms in general and minimally invasive surgery on surgical trainee experience, skill level, and comfort in performing general surgical and minimally invasive procedures following completion of training. We review current literature and explore the application of robotic surgery to surgical training, where minimum case thresholds and breadth distribution are well defined, and where development of surgical technique is historically gained through delicate tissue handling with haptic feedback rather than relying on visual feedback alone. We call for careful consideration as to how best to incorporate robotics in surgical training in order to embrace technological advances without endangering the surgical proficiency of the surgeons of tomorrow. Key message The large-scale incorporation of robotics into general and minimally invasive surgical training is something that most, if not all, trainees must grapple with in today's world, and the proportion of robotics is increasing. This shift may significantly negatively affect trainees in terms of surgical skill upon completion of training and must be approached with an appropriate degree of concern and thoughtfulness so as to protect the surgeons of tomorrow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien J. Lazar
- New York University Langone Health, Department of General Surgery, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - George S. Ferzli
- New York University Langone Health, Department of General Surgery, New York, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McDonald-Bowyer A, Syer T, Retter A, Stoyanov D, Stilli A. Autonomous control of an ultrasound probe for intra-operative ultrasonography using vision-based shape sensing of pneumatically attachable flexible rails. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2024:10.1007/s11548-024-03178-z. [PMID: 38777945 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-024-03178-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery, surgeons often use intra-operative ultrasound to visualise endophytic structures and localise resection margins. This must be performed by a highly skilled surgeon. Automating this subtask may reduce the cognitive load for the surgeon and improve patient outcomes. METHODS We demonstrate vision-based shape sensing of the pneumatically attachable flexible (PAF) rail by using colour-dependent image segmentation. The shape-sensing framework is evaluated on known curves ranging from r = 30 to r = 110 mm, replicating curvatures in a human kidney. The shape sensing is then used to inform path planning of a collaborative robot arm paired with an intra-operative ultrasound probe. We execute 15 autonomous ultrasound scans of a tumour-embedded kidney phantom and retrieve viable ultrasound images, as well as seven freehand ultrasound scans for comparison. RESULTS The vision-based sensor is shown to have comparable sensing accuracy with FBGS-based systems. We find the RMSE of the vision-based shape sensing of the PAF rail compared with ground truth to be 0.4975 ± 0.4169 mm. The ultrasound images acquired by the robot and by the human were evaluated by two independent clinicians. The median score across all criteria for both readers was '3-good' for human and '4-very good' for robot. CONCLUSION We have proposed a framework for autonomous intra-operative US scanning using vision-based shape sensing to inform path planning. Ultrasound images were evaluated by clinicians for sharpness of image, clarity of structures visible, and contrast of solid and fluid areas. Clinicians evaluated that robot-acquired images were superior to human-acquired images in all metrics. Future work will translate the framework to a da Vinci surgical robot.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tom Syer
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anaplioti E, Gkeka K, Katsakiori P, Peteinaris A, Tatanis V, Faitatziadis S, Pagonis K, Natsos A, Obaidat M, Vagionis A, Spinos T, Tsaturyan A, Vrettos T, Liatsikos E, Kallidonis P. How long do we need to reach sufficient expertise with the avatera® robotic system? Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:1577-1583. [PMID: 38175386 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03914-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the learning curve in four basic surgical skills in laparoscopic and robotic surgeries, and evaluate the approximate time needed to reach sufficient expertise in performing these tasks with the avatera® system. METHODS Twenty urology residents with no previous experience in dry-lab and robotic surgery were asked to complete four basic laparoscopic tasks (peg transfer, circle cutting, needle guidance, and suturing) laparoscopically and robotically. All participants were asked to complete the tasks first after watching the Uroweb educational material and, second, after undertaking a 2-hour training in robotic and laparoscopic dry-lab. Thereafter, all trainees continued to undertake 2-hour training programs until being able to complete the tasks with the avatera® robot at the desired time. Paired t test and one-way ANOVA test were used to analyze time differences between the groups. RESULTS Time needed to complete all tasks either robotically or laparoscopically was significantly less in the second compared to the first attempt for all Groups in each Task. In the robotic dry-lab, time needed to complete the tasks was significantly less than in the laparoscopic dry-lab. A significant effect of previous laparoscopic experience of the participants on the training time needed to achieve most of the goal times was detected. CONCLUSION The results of the study highlight the role of previous laparoscopic experience in the training time needed to achieve the performance time goals and demonstrate that the learning curve of basic surgical skills using the avatera® system is steeper than the laparoscopic one.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eirini Anaplioti
- Department of Urology, University of Patras School of Medicine, University Hospital of Rion, 26504, Rio, Patras, Greece
| | - Kristiana Gkeka
- Department of Urology, University of Patras School of Medicine, University Hospital of Rion, 26504, Rio, Patras, Greece
| | - Paraskevi Katsakiori
- Department of Urology, University of Patras School of Medicine, University Hospital of Rion, 26504, Rio, Patras, Greece
| | - Angelis Peteinaris
- Department of Urology, University of Patras School of Medicine, University Hospital of Rion, 26504, Rio, Patras, Greece
| | - Vasileios Tatanis
- Department of Urology, University of Patras School of Medicine, University Hospital of Rion, 26504, Rio, Patras, Greece
| | - Solon Faitatziadis
- Department of Urology, University of Patras School of Medicine, University Hospital of Rion, 26504, Rio, Patras, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Pagonis
- Department of Urology, University of Patras School of Medicine, University Hospital of Rion, 26504, Rio, Patras, Greece
| | - Anastasios Natsos
- Department of Urology, University of Patras School of Medicine, University Hospital of Rion, 26504, Rio, Patras, Greece
| | - Mohammed Obaidat
- Department of Urology, University of Patras School of Medicine, University Hospital of Rion, 26504, Rio, Patras, Greece
| | - Athanasios Vagionis
- Department of Urology, University of Patras School of Medicine, University Hospital of Rion, 26504, Rio, Patras, Greece
| | - Theodoros Spinos
- Department of Urology, University of Patras School of Medicine, University Hospital of Rion, 26504, Rio, Patras, Greece
| | - Arman Tsaturyan
- Department of Urology, University of Patras School of Medicine, University Hospital of Rion, 26504, Rio, Patras, Greece
- Department of Urology, Erebouni Medical Center, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Theofanis Vrettos
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Rion, Patras, Greece
| | - Evangelos Liatsikos
- Department of Urology, University of Patras School of Medicine, University Hospital of Rion, 26504, Rio, Patras, Greece.
- Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Panagiotis Kallidonis
- Department of Urology, University of Patras School of Medicine, University Hospital of Rion, 26504, Rio, Patras, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dixon F, Vitish-Sharma P, Khanna A, Keeler BD. Robotic assisted surgery reduces ergonomic risk during minimally invasive colorectal resection: the VOLCANO randomised controlled trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:142. [PMID: 38676748 PMCID: PMC11055713 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03322-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Minimally invasive surgery benefits patients but poor operating ergonomics causes musculoskeletal injuries in surgeons. This randomised controlled trial aims to assess whether robotic-assisted surgery with the open-console Versius® system can reduce surgeons' ergonomic risks during major colorectal resections. METHODS Prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05262296) in March 2022. Adult patients requiring a minimally invasive colorectal resection were potentially eligible. Photographs taken at 2-min intervals were analysed using the objective Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) posture analysis scale to calculate intraoperative surgeon ergonomic risk. Secondary outcomes included team communication (Oxford NOTECHS II), surgeon cognitive strain (modified NASA-TLX scale), and clinical outcomes. RESULTS Sixty patients were randomised in a 2:1 ratio (40 robot, 20 laparoscopic). Mean age was 65yrs and 34 (57%) were male. Body Mass Index did not differ between the 2 groups (overall mean 29.0 ± 5) and there were equal proportions of left and right-colonic resections. REBA was significantly lower in the robotic arm (median robot REBA score 3 vs lap REBA 5 [p < 0.001]), equating to an injury risk category drop from "medium" to "low risk". There were no significant differences in team communication, operative duration, or patient outcomes. Surgeon cognitive strain was lower in robotic cases (mean robot 32.4 ± 10.3 vs lap 45.6 ± 14.3 [p < 0.001]). CONCLUSIONS This trial demonstrates that robotic surgery with an open-console system reduces ergonomic risk scores and cognitive strain during colorectal resections, with no apparent detriment to team communication. This may therefore be a safe & feasible solution to the increasing problem of work-related musculoskeletal injuries in surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Dixon
- Department of Surgery, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, Eaglestone, MK6 5LD, UK.
- University of Buckingham, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK.
| | - Parveen Vitish-Sharma
- Department of Surgery, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, Eaglestone, MK6 5LD, UK
- University of Buckingham, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK
| | - Achal Khanna
- Department of Surgery, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, Eaglestone, MK6 5LD, UK
| | - Barrie D Keeler
- Department of Surgery, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, Eaglestone, MK6 5LD, UK
- University of Buckingham, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hecht CJ, Porto JR, Sanghvi PA, Homma Y, Sculco PK, Kamath AF. Contemporary analysis of the learning curve for robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty emerging technologies. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:160. [PMID: 38578350 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01928-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Robotic assisted (RA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) offers improved acetabular component placement and radiographic outcomes, but inconsistent assessment methods of its learning curves render the evaluation of adopting novel platforms challenging. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to assess the learning curve associated with RA-THA, both tracking a surgeon's performance across initial cases and comparing their performance to manual THA (M-THA). PubMed, MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar were searched on June 16, 2023, to identify studies published between January 1, 2000 and June 16, 2023 (PROSPERO registration: CRD42023437339). The query yielded 655 unique articles, which were screened for eligibility. The final analysis included 11 articles, evaluating 1351 THA procedures. Risk of bias was assessed via the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) tool. The mean MINORS score was 21.3 ± 0.9. RA-THA provided immediate improvements in acetabular component placement accuracy and radiographic outcomes compared to M-THA, with little to no experience required to achieve peak proficiency. A modest learning curve (12-17 cases) was associated with operative time, which was elevated compared to M-THA (+ 9-13 min). RA-THA offers immediate advantages to M-THA for component placement accuracy and radiographic outcomes. Surgeons should expect to experience increased operative times, which become less pronounced or equivalent to M-THA after a modest caseload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian J Hecht
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Hip Preservation, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Joshua R Porto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Hip Preservation, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Parshva A Sanghvi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Hip Preservation, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Yasuhiro Homma
- Department of Medicine for Orthopaedics and Motor Organs, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Peter K Sculco
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Atul F Kamath
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Hip Preservation, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Choi JB, Choi JH, Kong Y, Lee JK, Kim W, Yu HW, Kim SJ, Chai YJ, Choi JY, Lee KE. Outcomes of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic parathyroidectomy versus open parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism: a single-institution retrospective study. Ann Surg Treat Res 2024; 106:203-210. [PMID: 38586553 PMCID: PMC10995836 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2024.106.4.203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic parathyroidectomy (BABA-RP) aims to remove overactive or enlarged parathyroid glands with no visible neck collar incision. In this study, we compared the safety and surgical outcomes of BABA-RP vs. those of an open surgery group to ascertain whether BABA-RP is a safe and feasible surgical approach for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). Methods This single-institution retrospective cohort study included 74 patients with primary HPT who underwent open parathyroidectomy (n = 37) or BABA-RP (n = 37) at our institution between November 2014 and March 2023. Patient demographics, biochemical cure rates, operative time, blood loss rates, and complication rates were examined and compared. Results The patients in the BABA-RP group were younger and had a longer mean operative time. Regarding complication events, 2 patients in the open surgery group and 1 patient in the BABA-RP group had transient hypoparathyroidism. All 74 patients achieved biochemical cure at <6 months, regardless of the approach used. Two patients in the BABA-RP group and 1 patient in the open surgery group had carcinoma on surgical pathology. All 3 patients with parathyroid carcinoma remained recurrence-free at 1-year follow-up. Conclusion Compared with the open procedure, BABA-RP is a safe and feasible procedure that provides an excellent biochemical cure rate for patients with pHPT and has superior cosmetic benefits with equivalent surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Bong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jee-Hye Choi
- Deprtment of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yoon Kong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Ja Kyung Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Woochul Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeong Won Yu
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Su-jin Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Jun Chai
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - June Young Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyu Eun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ohene-Agyei J, Madhira M, Smith H, Sardiu ME, Lee EK. Open or robotic? Radical cystectomies for patients with non-metastatic bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Transl Sci 2024; 8:e57. [PMID: 38655453 PMCID: PMC11036446 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background This systematic review and meta-analysis will review randomized control trials for localized bladder cancer, evaluating surgical and pathologic outcomes of ORC versus RARC. Methods Randomized studies evaluating adults with non-metastatic bladder cancer who underwent a radical cystectomy. Randomized trials were selected for final review. Data was extracted and analyzed with Revman 5 software. The primary outcome was complication rates within 90 days. Secondary outcomes included postoperative quality of life, estimated intraoperative blood loss, and other perioperative outcomes. Continuous variables were reported using mean difference with 95% confidence intervals, and dichotomous variables were reported using risk difference with 95% confidence intervals with RARC as the experimental group and ORC as the reference group. Results Of 134 articles screened, six unique randomized studies were selected. For Grade I-II complications, the risk ratio (RR) was 0.92 (95% CI [0.79,1.08], p = 0.33), and for Grade III-V complications, RR 0.93 (95% CI [0.73,1.18], p = 0.59). RARC resulted in decreased blood loss (95% CI [-438.08, -158.44], p < 0.00001) and longer operative time (95% CI [55.23, 133.13], p < 0.00001). Quality of life using the EORTC-QLQ-30 global health score at 3 months post-op appeared to favor RARC with a mean difference of 4.46 points (95% CI [1.78, 7.15], p = 0.001). Pathologic outcomes neither statistically nor clinically favored one modality, as there was no significant difference between mean lymph node yield (p = 0.49), positive lymph nodes (p = 1.00), and positive surgical margins (p = 0.85) between the surgical modalities. Conclusions Although one surgical modality is not overtly superior, the choice may be decided by mitigating individual operative risk factors like intraoperative blood loss, operative time, post-operative quality of life, as well as institutional costs and learning curve among surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jada Ohene-Agyei
- University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Holly Smith
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Eugene K Lee
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hecht Ii CJ, Porto JR, Sanghvi PA, Homma Y, Sculco PK, Kamath AF. Navigating the learning curve: assessing caseload and comparing outcomes before and after the learning curve of computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:104. [PMID: 38430388 PMCID: PMC10908601 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01855-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Computer-navigated (CN) total hip arthroplasty (THA) offers improved acetabular component placement and radiographic outcomes, but inconsistent assessment methods of its learning curves render the evaluation of adopting a novel platform challenging. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to assess the learning curve associated with CN-THA, both tracking a surgeon's performance across initial cases and comparing their performance to manual THA (M-THA). METHODS A search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar on June 16, 2023 to find research articles published after January 1, 2000 (PROSPERO registration: CRD4202339403) that investigated the learning curve associated with CN-THA. 655 distinct articles were retrieved and subsequently screened for eligibility. In the final analysis, nine publications totaling 847 THAs were evaluated. The Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) tool was utilized to evaluate the potential for bias, with the mean MINORS score of 21.3 ± 1.2. RESULTS CN-THA showed early advantages to M-THA for component placement accuracy and radiographic outcomes but longer operative times (+ 3- 20 min). There was a learning curve required to achieve peak proficiency in these metrics, though mixed methodologies made the required caseload unclear. CONCLUSIONS CN-THA offers immediate advantages to M-THA for component placement accuracy and radiographic outcomes, though CN-THA's advantages become more pronounced with experience. Surgeons should anticipate longer operative times during the learning curve for CN-THA, which lessen following a modest caseload. A more thorough evaluation of novel computer-navigated technologies would be enhanced by adopting a more uniform method of defining learning curves for outcomes of interest. Registration PROSPERO registration of the study protocol: CRD42023394031, 27 June 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian J Hecht Ii
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Hip Preservation, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Mail Code A41, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Joshua R Porto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Hip Preservation, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Mail Code A41, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Parshva A Sanghvi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Hip Preservation, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Mail Code A41, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Yasuhiro Homma
- Department of Medicine for Orthopaedics and Motor Organs, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Peter K Sculco
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Atul F Kamath
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Hip Preservation, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Mail Code A41, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wood JJ, Wood KS, Rosenau KA, Cho AC, Johnson AR, Muscatello VS, Tien IS, Straus J, Wolpe S, Zeldin A, Kazlauskas K, McLeod BD. Practitioner Adherence and Competence in MEYA, a Free Online Self-Instruction Program in Modular Psychotherapy and Counseling for Children's Autism-Related Clinical Needs. J Autism Dev Disord 2024:10.1007/s10803-023-06226-w. [PMID: 38277075 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-023-06226-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
The quality of care in public schools and other community settings for school-aged youths on the autism spectrum is variable and often not evidence-based. Training practitioners in these settings to deliver evidence-based practices (EBPs) may improve the quality of care. We developed a free internet-based training and clinical guidance system synthesizing multiple EBPs for youth on the autism spectrum addressing a range of mental health needs and autism-related behaviors, entitled Modular EBPs for Youth on the Autism Spectrum (MEYA; meya.ucla.edu). A multiple baseline study was conducted with seven practitioners recruited from mental health practice settings across the United States who were providing services to children on the autism spectrum (aged 6 to 17 years). Practitioners were randomly assigned to undergo baseline conditions of 2 to 8 weeks. Once online training in MEYA commenced, practitioners engaged in algorithm-guided self-instruction in EBPs for autism. Participants video-recorded sessions. Independent coders used the MEYA Fidelity Scale (MEYA-FS) to rate adherence and competence in EBPs for autism. Practitioners also completed measures pertaining to implementation outcomes and parents rated youth outcomes on personalized target behaviors. Five of seven practitioners increased their adherence to MEYA practices (i.e., MEYA-FS scores) following MEYA training. Findings for competence were similar, though somewhat less robust. Practitioners generally viewed MEYA as feasible, understandable, and acceptable. Most youth outcomes improved during MEYA. A randomized, controlled trial of MEYA would be helpful in characterizing its effectiveness for supporting practitioner EBP implementation and youth outcomes in school and community service settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Wood
- Department of Education, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
| | - Karen S Wood
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Kashia A Rosenau
- Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - An Chuen Cho
- Department of Education, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Amanda R Johnson
- Department of Education, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | - Ingrid S Tien
- Department of Education, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Jolie Straus
- Department of Education, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Samara Wolpe
- Department of Education, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | | | - Bryce D McLeod
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shafiei SB, Shadpour S, Sasangohar F, Mohler JL, Attwood K, Jing Z. Development of performance and learning rate evaluation models in robot-assisted surgery using electroencephalography and eye-tracking. NPJ SCIENCE OF LEARNING 2024; 9:3. [PMID: 38242909 PMCID: PMC10799032 DOI: 10.1038/s41539-024-00216-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
The existing performance evaluation methods in robot-assisted surgery (RAS) are mainly subjective, costly, and affected by shortcomings such as the inconsistency of results and dependency on the raters' opinions. The aim of this study was to develop models for an objective evaluation of performance and rate of learning RAS skills while practicing surgical simulator tasks. The electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye-tracking data were recorded from 26 subjects while performing Tubes, Suture Sponge, and Dots and Needles tasks. Performance scores were generated by the simulator program. The functional brain networks were extracted using EEG data and coherence analysis. Then these networks, along with community detection analysis, facilitated the extraction of average search information and average temporal flexibility features at 21 Brodmann areas (BA) and four band frequencies. Twelve eye-tracking features were extracted and used to develop linear random intercept models for performance evaluation and multivariate linear regression models for the evaluation of the learning rate. Results showed that subject-wise standardization of features improved the R2 of the models. Average pupil diameter and rate of saccade were associated with performance in the Tubes task (multivariate analysis; p-value = 0.01 and p-value = 0.04, respectively). Entropy of pupil diameter was associated with performance in Dots and Needles task (multivariate analysis; p-value = 0.01). Average temporal flexibility and search information in several BAs and band frequencies were associated with performance and rate of learning. The models may be used to objectify performance and learning rate evaluation in RAS once validated with a broader sample size and tasks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Somayeh B Shafiei
- Intelligent Cancer Care Laboratory, Department of Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.
| | - Saeed Shadpour
- Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Farzan Sasangohar
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - James L Mohler
- Department of Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA
| | - Kristopher Attwood
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA
| | - Zhe Jing
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Raffaelli M, Greco F, Pennestrì F, Gallucci P, Ciccoritti L, Salvi G, Procopio PF, Voloudakis N. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with the novel platform Hugo TM RAS: preliminary experience in 15 patients. Updates Surg 2024; 76:179-185. [PMID: 37861973 PMCID: PMC10805871 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01657-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
Robotic assisted surgery is a rapidly developing field in bariatric surgery. Its wide diffusion has led to the development and standardisation of robotic assisted approaches for various bariatric operations. However, further application has been limited thus far due to issues of cost-effectiveness and accessibility. The introduction of new robotic platforms may help overcome those obstacles. In this study, we present the first fifteen cases of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) operations performed with the new Hugo™ RAS system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). From January to March 2023, consecutive patients scheduled for minimal invasive Roux-en-Y-Bypass were randomly selected and underwent the procedure robotic-assisted with the new platform. No exclusion criteria were applied. Seven female and eight male patients with a median BMI of 42 (range: 36-50) and obesity-related comorbidities in eight cases underwent RYGB. The median docking time was 7 min (range: 6-8.5) and the median console time was 100 min (range: 70-150). Procedures were performed without intraoperative complications and no conversion to laparoscopy or open surgery was noted. Operative times were indicative of a steep learning curve. No early post-operative complications were observed. Based on our initial experience, RYGB with the Hugo™ RAS system is promising and may be integrated in established robotic programmes without requiring a long adaptation period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Raffaelli
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Centro di Ricerca in Chirurgia delle Ghiandole Endocrine e dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Greco
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Pennestrì
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
- Centro di Ricerca in Chirurgia delle Ghiandole Endocrine e dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Pierpaolo Gallucci
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Ciccoritti
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Salvi
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Centro di Ricerca in Chirurgia delle Ghiandole Endocrine e dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Priscilla Francesca Procopio
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Centro di Ricerca in Chirurgia delle Ghiandole Endocrine e dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Nikolaos Voloudakis
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell'Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Centro di Ricerca in Chirurgia delle Ghiandole Endocrine e dell'Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sucandy I, Marques HP, Lippert T, Magistri P, Coelho JS, Ross SB, Chumbinho B, Di Sandro S, DiBenedetto F. ASO Author Reflections: Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A First Multicenter, Trans-Atlantic, Expert-Center Collaborative Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:154-155. [PMID: 37773564 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14362-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hugo P Marques
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplantation Center, Lisbon Central Hospitals and University Center/NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Trenton Lippert
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Joao Santos Coelho
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplantation Center, Lisbon Central Hospitals and University Center/NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Beatriz Chumbinho
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplantation Center, Lisbon Central Hospitals and University Center/NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabrizio DiBenedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sermonesi G, Tian BWCA, Vallicelli C, Abu-Zidan FM, Damaskos D, Kelly MD, Leppäniemi A, Galante JM, Tan E, Kirkpatrick AW, Khokha V, Romeo OM, Chirica M, Pikoulis M, Litvin A, Shelat VG, Sakakushev B, Wani I, Sall I, Fugazzola P, Cicuttin E, Toro A, Amico F, Mas FD, De Simone B, Sugrue M, Bonavina L, Campanelli G, Carcoforo P, Cobianchi L, Coccolini F, Chiarugi M, Di Carlo I, Di Saverio S, Podda M, Pisano M, Sartelli M, Testini M, Fette A, Rizoli S, Picetti E, Weber D, Latifi R, Kluger Y, Balogh ZJ, Biffl W, Jeekel H, Civil I, Hecker A, Ansaloni L, Bravi F, Agnoletti V, Beka SG, Moore EE, Catena F. Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:57. [PMID: 38066631 PMCID: PMC10704840 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00520-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopy is widely adopted across nearly all surgical subspecialties in the elective setting. Initially finding indication in minor abdominal emergencies, it has gradually become the standard approach in the majority of elective general surgery procedures. Despite many technological advances and increasing acceptance, the laparoscopic approach remains underutilized in emergency general surgery and in abdominal trauma. Emergency laparotomy continues to carry a high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been a growing interest from emergency and trauma surgeons in adopting minimally invasive surgery approaches in the acute surgical setting. The present position paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a review of the literature to reach a consensus on the indications and benefits of a laparoscopic-first approach in patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies or abdominal trauma. METHODS This position paper was developed according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee performed the literature review and drafted the position paper. An international panel of 54 experts then critically revised the manuscript and discussed it in detail, to develop a consensus on a position statement. RESULTS A total of 323 studies (systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized clinical trial, retrospective comparative cohort studies, case series) have been selected from an initial pool of 7409 studies. Evidence demonstrates several benefits of the laparoscopic approach in stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgical emergencies or abdominal trauma. The selection of a stable patient seems to be of paramount importance for a safe adoption of a laparoscopic approach. In hemodynamically stable patients, the laparoscopic approach was found to be safe, feasible and effective as a therapeutic tool or helpful to identify further management steps and needs, resulting in improved outcomes, regardless of conversion. Appropriate patient selection, surgeon experience and rigorous minimally invasive surgical training, remain crucial factors to increase the adoption of laparoscopy in emergency general surgery and abdominal trauma. CONCLUSIONS The WSES expert panel suggests laparoscopy as the first approach for stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Sermonesi
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| | - Brian W C A Tian
- Department of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Carlo Vallicelli
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| | - Fikri M Abu-Zidan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al‑Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | | | | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Joseph M Galante
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Edward Tan
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Vladimir Khokha
- Department of Emergency Surgery, City Hospital, Mozyr, Belarus
| | - Oreste Marco Romeo
- Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Care Program, Bronson Methodist Hospital, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Mircea Chirica
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, La Tronche, France
| | - Manos Pikoulis
- 3Rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Andrey Litvin
- Department of Surgical Diseases No. 3, Gomel State Medical University, Gomel, Belarus
| | | | - Boris Sakakushev
- General Surgery Department, Medical University, University Hospital St George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Imtiaz Wani
- Department of Surgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India
| | - Ibrahima Sall
- General Surgery Department, Military Teaching Hospital, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Enrico Cicuttin
- Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Adriana Toro
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, General Surgery Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Francesco Amico
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Francesca Dal Mas
- Department of Management, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Campus Economico San Giobbe Cannaregio, 873, 30100, Venice, Italy
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France
| | - Michael Sugrue
- Donegal Clinical Research Academy Emergency Surgery Outcome Project, Letterkenny University Hospital, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Carcoforo
- Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Isidoro Di Carlo
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, General Surgery Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- General Surgery Department Hospital of San Benedetto del Tronto, Marche Region, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, Emergency Surgery Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Michele Pisano
- General and Emergency Surgery, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Mario Testini
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery, University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Andreas Fette
- Pediatric Surgery, Children's Care Center, SRH Klinikum Suhl, Suhl, Thuringia, Germany
| | - Sandro Rizoli
- Surgery Department, Section of Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital (HGH), Doha, Qatar
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero‑Universitaria Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Dieter Weber
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Rifat Latifi
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Zsolt Janos Balogh
- Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Walter Biffl
- Division of Trauma/Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Hans Jeekel
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ian Civil
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Andreas Hecker
- Emergency Medicine Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Bravi
- Healthcare Administration, Santa Maria Delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Ernest Eugene Moore
- Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wieker H, Hinrichs C, Retzlaff M, Spille JH, Laudien M, Acil Y, Wiltfang J, Gülses A. A technical feasibility study on adaptation of a microsurgical robotic system to an intraoperative complication management in dental implantology: perforated Schneiderian membrane repair using Symani ® Surgical System. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2861-2867. [PMID: 37803127 PMCID: PMC10678809 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01721-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to test the technical and clinical feasibility of a robotic system and investigate its potential in the surgical repair of perforated Schneiderian membranes using an ex-vivo porcine model. Eight pig heads were operated conventionally via a surgical loop and eight pig heads with the surgical robot "Symani® Surgical System" (Medical Microinstruments, Inc., Pisa, Italy). On each specimen, the Schneiderian membrane was incised over a length of 0.7 mm resembling a perforation. Operation time, the maximum sinusoidal pressure, the course of the pressure and the filling volume were measured. Additionally, adaptation of the wound edges has been detected via scanning electron microscopy. There were no significant differences for the pressure maximum (p = 0.528), for the time until the pressure maximum was reached (p = 0.528), or for the maximum filling volume (p = 0.674). The time needed for the suturing of the membrane via robotic surgery was significantly longer (p < 0.001). However, the scanning electron microscope revealed a better adaptation of the wound edges with robotic surgery. The technical feasibility of robot-assisted suturing of Schneiderian membrane laceration using the robotic system has been confirmed for the first time. No differences considering the pressure resistance compared to the conventional repair could be observed, but advantages in wound adaptation could be found with an electron microscope. Regarding the material and training costs and limited indications spectrum, robotic surgery systems still might not present financially feasible options in the daily dental practice yet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henning Wieker
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Christian Albrechts University, UKSH Campus Kiel, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Cedric Hinrichs
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Christian Albrechts University, UKSH Campus Kiel, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Merle Retzlaff
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Christian Albrechts University, UKSH Campus Kiel, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Johannes Heinrich Spille
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Christian Albrechts University, UKSH Campus Kiel, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Martin Laudien
- Department of ENT Surgery, Christian Albrechts University, UKSH Campus Kiel, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Yahya Acil
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Christian Albrechts University, UKSH Campus Kiel, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jörg Wiltfang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Christian Albrechts University, UKSH Campus Kiel, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Aydin Gülses
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Christian Albrechts University, UKSH Campus Kiel, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Daykan Y, Rotem R, O'Reilly BA. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic floor surgery: Review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2023; 91:102418. [PMID: 37776580 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgical techniques have become more common in pelvic floor reconstructive urogynaecological surgery, specifically, robotic-assisted pelvic floor surgery. Female pelvic floor anatomy is complex, and some repairs require highly experienced surgical skills that can be gained more easily using robotic-assisted surgery. A common application of the robotic platform in urogynaecological surgeries includes sacrocolpopexy, which has become the gold standard approach in the last decade for the correction of apical prolapse. Additional procedures include sacrohysteropexy, sacrocervicopexy, fistula repair, and complex procedures involving the bladder and other pelvic organs. Despite its increasing use and clear benefit in our field, data in the literature and, in particular, randomised controlled trials are sparse. This review provides an update, incorporating recently published literature and our personal experience in that field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yair Daykan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Reut Rotem
- Department of Urogynaecology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Barry A O'Reilly
- Department of Urogynaecology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chan BCF. The Challenges in Conducting Economic Evaluations for Rehabilitation Technologies. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2023; 29:44-52. [PMID: 38174139 PMCID: PMC10759881 DOI: 10.46292/sci23-00035s] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Background Health technology assessment (HTA) is an important evidentiary component in the decision-making process for the adoption of new healthcare technologies to the healthcare system. Economic evidence is an important consideration in HTAs. Recent systematic reviews in rehabilitation have shown a limited number of economic evaluations and high levels of uncertainty in the results. It is unclear whether there are challenges related to the field of rehabilitation and the technologies used in rehabilitation that inhibit the development of economic evidence. Methods In this study, economic evaluations in rehabilitation were reviewed. This was followed by a summary of the latest evidence on the challenges of conducting HTA for medical devices and the relationship with rehabilitation technologies. Finally, several considerations are suggested to improve the HTA of technologies that target rehabilitation. A literature review of Google Scholar and PubMed was conducted to identify reviews in economic evaluations in rehabilitation. A recent review on the barriers to HTA of medical devices in general was also examined to identify similar concerns with rehabilitation technologies. Results The challenges identified include the lack of high-quality studies, the interaction between the technology and the user, the short product life cycle, and estimation of efficacy in technologies with multiple target populations. Conclusion Overall, many of the challenges in evaluating medical devices also apply to rehabilitation interventions. Further research and discussion on these issues are necessary to increase the clinical evidence for rehabilitation technologies, strengthen the development of HTAs, and facilitate the use of technologies to improve the health of individuals requiring rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Chun-Fai Chan
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abreu AA, Rail B, Farah E, Alterio RE, Scott DJ, Sankaranarayanan G, Zeh HJ, Polanco PM. Baseline performance in a robotic virtual reality platform predicts rate of skill acquisition in a proficiency-based curriculum: a cohort study of surgical trainees. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:8804-8809. [PMID: 37603102 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10372-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Residency programs must prepare to train the next generation of surgeons on the robotic platform. The purpose of this study was to determine if baseline skills of residents on a virtual reality (VR) robotic simulator before intern year predicted future performance in a proficiency-based curriculum. METHODS Across two academic years, 21 general surgery PGY-1s underwent the robotic surgery boot camp at the University of Texas Southwestern. During boot camp, subjects completed five previously validated VR tasks, and their performance metrics (score, time, and economy of motion [EOM]) were extracted retrospectively from their Intuitive learning accounts. The same metrics were assessed during their residency until they reached previously validated proficiency benchmarks. Outcomes were defined as the score at proficiency, attempts to reach proficiency, and time to proficiency. Spearman's rho and Mann-Whitney U tests were used; median (IQR) was reported. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS Twenty-one residents completed at least three out of the five boot camp tasks and achieved proficiency in the former during residency. The median average score at boot camp was 12.3 (IQR: 5.14-18.5). The median average EOM at boot camp was 599.58 cm (IQR: 529.64-676.60). The average score at boot camp significantly correlated with lower time to achieve proficiency (p < 0.05). EOM at boot camp showed a significant correlation with attempts to proficiency and time to proficiency (p < 0.01). Residents with an average baseline EOM below the median showed a significant difference in attempts to proficiency (p < 0.05) and time to proficiency (p < 0.05) compared to those with EOMs above or equal to the median. CONCLUSION Residents with an innate ability to perform tasks with better EOM may acquire robotic surgery skills faster. Future investigators could explore how these innate differences impact performance throughout residency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andres A Abreu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Benjamin Rail
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Emile Farah
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Rodrigo E Alterio
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Daniel J Scott
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Ganesh Sankaranarayanan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Patricio M Polanco
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Panico G, Mastrovito S, Campagna G, Monterossi G, Costantini B, Gioè A, Oliva R, Ferraro C, Ercoli A, Fanfani F, Scambia G. Robotic docking time with the Hugo™ RAS system in gynecologic surgery: a procedure independent learning curve using the cumulative summation analysis (CUSUM). J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2547-2554. [PMID: 37542580 PMCID: PMC10492716 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01693-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery has been proven to offer improvements in term of surgical learning curve and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery, but has often been criticized for its longer operative times compared to conventional laparoscopy. Additional times can be split into time required for system set-up, robotic arms docking and calibration of robotic instruments; secondly, surgeon's learning curve. One of the newest systems recently launched on the market is the Hugo™ RAS (MEDTRONIC Inc, United States). As some of the earliest adopters of the Hugo™ RAS system technology, we present our data on robotic docking learning curve for the first 192 gynecologic robotic cases performed at our institution. Our data indicates that robotic set-up and docking with the new Hugo™ RAS robotic surgical system can be performed time-effectively and that the specific robotic docking learning curve is comparable to preexisting data for other platforms. This preliminary insights into this recently released system may be worthwhile for other centers which may soon adopt this new technology and may need some relevant information on topics such as OR times. Further studies are necessary to assess the different features of the Hugo™ RAS considering other technical and surgical aspects, to fully become familiar with this novel technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Panico
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Chirurgia Ginecologica, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Mastrovito
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Chirurgia Ginecologica, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Campagna
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Chirurgia Ginecologica, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Giorgia Monterossi
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Costantini
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Gioè
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Oliva
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, 00168, Rome, Italy
- IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France
| | - Chiara Ferraro
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Chirurgia Ginecologica, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo Ercoli
- PID Ginecologia Oncologica e Chirurgia Ginecologica Miniinvasiva, Università Degli Studi di Messina, Policlinico G.Martino, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Chirurgia Ginecologica, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Chirurgia Ginecologica, 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zaepfel S, Marcovei R, Fernandez-de-Sevilla E, Sourrouille I, Honore C, Gelli M, Faron M, Benhaim L. Robotic-assisted surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a long but safe learning curve. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2099-2108. [PMID: 37219783 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01624-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The number of robotic-assisted procedures for rectal cancer is rising. The risk of this procedure when performed by surgeon with limited robotic experience is unknown and the precise duration of the learning curve debated. We, therefore, aimed to analyze the learning curve and its related safety in a single center before the development of mentoring programs. We prospectively recorded all robotic procedures performed for colorectal cancer between 2015 and 2020 by a single surgeon. Operative times for partial and total proctectomy were analyzed. The learning curve was defined by comparison with the standard duration of the laparoscopic procedure performed in expert centers (published in GRECCAR 5 and GRECCAR 6 trials) and calculated using a cumulative summation for learning curve test (LC-CUSUM). Among the 174 patients operated for colorectal cancer, we analyzed the outcomes of the 89 patients operated by partial and total robotic proctectomy. To reach repeatedly the same surgical duration as laparoscopic procedure for partial or complete proctectomy, the LC-CUSUM identified a learning curve of 57 patients. A severe morbidity in this population, defined by Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 3, was observed in 15 cases (16.8%) with an anastomotic leak rate of 13.5%. The rate of completeness of mesorectal excision was 90% and the mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 15 (± 9). Using operative time as end-point, the learning curve of rectal cancer robotic surgery identified a cut-off of 57 patients. The technic remained safe with acceptable morbidity and oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Zaepfel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Raluca Marcovei
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Elena Fernandez-de-Sevilla
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Isabelle Sourrouille
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Charles Honore
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Maximiliano Gelli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Matthieu Faron
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Leonor Benhaim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France.
- Centre de Recherche Des Cordeliers, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, CNRS SNC 5096, 15 rue de l'école de Médecine, 75006, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lin PL, Zheng F, Shin M, Liu X, Oh D, D'Attilio D. CUSUM learning curves: what they can and can't tell us. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7991-7999. [PMID: 37460815 PMCID: PMC10520215 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10252-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There has been increased interest in assessing the surgeon learning curve for new skill acquisition. While there is no consensus around the best methodology, one of the most frequently used learning curve assessments in the surgical literature is the cumulative sum curve (CUSUM) of operative time. To demonstrate the limitations of this methodology, we assessed the CUSUM of console time across cohorts of surgeons with differing case acquisition rates while varying the total number of cases used to calculate the CUSUM. METHODS We compared the CUSUM curves of the average console times of surgeons who completed their first 20 robotic-assisted (RAS) cases in 13, 26, 39, and 52 weeks, respectively, for their first 50 and 100 cases, respectively. This analysis was performed for prostatectomy (1094 surgeons), malignant hysterectomy (737 surgeons), and inguinal hernia (1486 surgeons). RESULTS In all procedures, the CUSUM curve of the cohort of surgeons who completed their first 20 procedures in 13 weeks demonstrated a lower slope than cohorts of surgeons with slower case acquisition rates. The case number at which the peak of the CUSUM curve occurs uniformly increases when the total number of cases used in generation of the CUSUM chart changes from 50 to 100 cases. CONCLUSION The CUSUM analyses of these three procedures suggests that surgeons with fast initial case acquisition rates have less variability in their operative times over the course of their learning curve. The peak of the CUSUM curve, which is often used in surgical learning curve literature to denote "proficiency" is predictably influenced by the total number of procedures evaluated, suggesting that defining the peak as the point at which a surgeon has overcome the learning curve is subject to routine bias. The CUSUM peak, by itself, is an insufficient measure of "conquering the learning curve."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng-Lin Lin
- Intuitive Surgical, 1020 Kifer Road, Sunnyvale, CA, 94086-5304, USA.
| | - Feibi Zheng
- Intuitive Surgical, 1020 Kifer Road, Sunnyvale, CA, 94086-5304, USA
| | - Minkyung Shin
- Intuitive Surgical, 1020 Kifer Road, Sunnyvale, CA, 94086-5304, USA
| | - Xi Liu
- Intuitive Surgical, 1020 Kifer Road, Sunnyvale, CA, 94086-5304, USA
| | - Daniel Oh
- Intuitive Surgical, 1020 Kifer Road, Sunnyvale, CA, 94086-5304, USA
| | - Daniel D'Attilio
- Intuitive Surgical, 1020 Kifer Road, Sunnyvale, CA, 94086-5304, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rifai AO, Rembetski EM, Stutts LC, Mazurek ZD, Yeh JL, Rifai K, Bear RA, Maquiera AJ, Rydell DJ. Retrospective analysis of operative time and time to discharge for laparoscopic vs robotic approaches to appendectomy and cholecystectomy. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2187-2193. [PMID: 37271758 PMCID: PMC10492745 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01632-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Robotic-assisted appendectomies and cholecystectomies are believed to increase cost compared to the gold standard laparoscopic approach. Two equally qualified surgeons performed both approaches over 2 years to evaluate intraoperative duration, time to discharge, conversion to open procedure, and readmission within 30 days. 110 laparoscopic, 81 robotic-assisted appendectomies; and 105 laparoscopic and 165 robotic-assisted cholecystectomies were performed. Intraoperative time; laparoscopic appendectomy was 1.402 vs 1.3615 h for robotic-assisted (P value = 0.304); laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 1.692 vs 1.634 h for robotic-assisted (P value = 0.196). Time to discharge, was 38.26 for laparoscopic vs 28.349 h for robotic-assisted appendectomy (P value = 0.010), and 35.95 for laparoscopic vs 28.46 h for robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (P value = 0.002). Intraoperative conversion to open; only laparoscopic procedures were converted, one appendectomy and nine cholecystectomies. None in the robotic-assisted procedures. Readmissions, none in the appendectomy group and three in the cholecystectomy group. One laparoscopic and two robotic-assisted cholecystectomy patients were readmitted. Intraoperative times for robotic appendectomy and cholecystectomy were not longer than laparoscopic approach. Robotic approach shortened the time to discharge and the likelihood for conversion to open procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Oussama Rifai
- The Education and Research Department, The Virtual Nephrologist, INC, PO Box 1750, Lynn Haven, FL, 32444-5950, USA.
| | - Emily M Rembetski
- ACOM, Research Department, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, 445 Health Sciences Boulevard, Dothan, AL, 36303, USA
| | - Larry Collins Stutts
- ACOM, Research Department, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, 445 Health Sciences Boulevard, Dothan, AL, 36303, USA
| | - Zachary D Mazurek
- ACOM, Research Department, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, 445 Health Sciences Boulevard, Dothan, AL, 36303, USA
| | - Jenifer L Yeh
- ACOM, Research Department, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, 445 Health Sciences Boulevard, Dothan, AL, 36303, USA
| | - Kareem Rifai
- ACOM, Research Department, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, 445 Health Sciences Boulevard, Dothan, AL, 36303, USA
| | - Ryan A Bear
- ACOM, Research Department, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, 445 Health Sciences Boulevard, Dothan, AL, 36303, USA
| | | | - David J Rydell
- Envision Physician Services, HCA Florida Gulf Coast Hospital, 449 west 23rd stree, Panama City, FL, 32405, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Clanahan JM, Yee A, Awad MM. Active control time: an objective performance metric for trainee participation in robotic surgery. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2117-2123. [PMID: 37237112 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01628-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Trainee participation and progression in robotic general surgery remain poorly defined. Computer-assisted technology offers the potential to provide and track objective performance metrics. In this study, we aimed to validate the use of a novel metric-active control time (ACT)-for assessing trainee participation in robotic-assisted cases. Performance data from da Vinci Surgical Systems was retrospectively analyzed for all robotic cases involving trainees with a single minimally invasive surgeon over 10 months. The primary outcome metric was percent ACT-the amount of trainee console time spent in active system manipulations over total active time from both consoles. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U statistical tests were applied in analyses. A total of 123 robotic cases with 18 general surgery residents and 1 fellow were included. Of these, 56 were categorized as complex. Median %ACT was statistically different between trainee levels for all case types taken in aggregate (PGY1s 3.0% [IQR 2-14%], PGY3s 32% [IQR 27-66%], PGY4s 42% [IQR 26-52%], PGY5s 50% [IQR 28-70%], and fellow 61% [IQR 41-85%], p = < 0.0001). When stratified by complexity, median %ACT was higher in standard versus complex cases for PGY5 (60% vs. 36%, p = 0.0002) and fellow groups (74% vs. 47%, p = 0.0045). In this study, we demonstrated an increase in %ACT with trainee level and with standard versus complex robotic cases. These findings are consistent with hypotheses, providing validity evidence for ACT as an objective measurement of trainee participation in robotic-assisted cases. Future studies will aim to define task-specific ACT to guide further robotic training and performance assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie M Clanahan
- Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Mailstop 8109-22-9905, Campus Box 8109, St. Louis, MO, 63110-1093, USA.
| | - Andrew Yee
- Data and Analytics, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Peachtree Corners, GA, 30092, USA
| | - Michael M Awad
- Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Mailstop 8109-22-9905, Campus Box 8109, St. Louis, MO, 63110-1093, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Centonze L, Di Bella C, Giacomoni A, Silvestre C, De Carlis R, Frassoni S, Franchin B, Angrisani M, Tuci F, Di Bello M, Bagnardi V, Lauterio A, Furian L, De Carlis L. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Retrospective Bicentric Comparison of Learning Curves and Surgical Outcomes From 2 High-volume European Centers. Transplantation 2023; 107:2009-2017. [PMID: 37195281 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) represents the gold-standard technique for kidney living donation, robotic donor nephrectomy (RDN) settled as another appealing minimally invasive technique over the past decades. A comparison between LDN and RDN outcomes was performed. METHODS RDN and LDN outcomes were compared, focusing on operative time and perioperative risk factors affecting surgery duration. Learning curves for both techniques were compared through spline regression and cumulative sum models. RESULTS The study analyzed 512 procedures (154 RDN and 358 LDN procedures) performed between 2010 and 2021 in 2 different high-volume transplant centers. The RDN group presented a higher prevalence of arterial variations (36.2 versus 22.4%; P = 0.001) compared with the LDN cohort. No open conversions occurred; operative time (210 versus 195 min; P = 0.011) and warm ischemia time (WIT; 230 versus 180 s; P < 0.001) were longer in RDN. Postoperative complication rate was similar (8.4% versus 11.5%; P = 0.49); the RDN group showed shorter hospital stay (4 versus 5 d; P < 0.001). Spline regression models depicted a faster learning curve in the RDN group ( P = 0.0002). Accordingly, cumulative sum analysis highlighted a turning point after about 50 procedures among the RDN cohort and after about 100 procedures among the LDN group.Higher body mass index resulted as an independent risk factor for longer operative time for both techniques; multiple arteries significantly prolonged operative time in LDN, whereas RDN was longer in right kidney procurements; both procedures were equally shortened by growing surgical experience. CONCLUSIONS RDN grants a faster learning curve and improves multiple vessel handling. Incidence of postoperative complications was low for both techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Centonze
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Caterina Di Bella
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Giacomoni
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Silvestre
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Riccardo De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
- PhD Course in Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Franchin
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Angrisani
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Tuci
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Marianna Di Bello
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Lauterio
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Davey MG, Temperley HC, O'Sullivan NJ, Marcelino V, Ryan OK, Ryan ÉJ, Donlon NE, Johnston SM, Robb WB. Minimally Invasive and Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5544-5557. [PMID: 37261563 PMCID: PMC10409677 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13654-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Optimal surgical management for gastric cancer remains controversial. We aimed to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes after open gastrectomy (OG), laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG), and robotic gastrectomy (RG) for gastric cancer. METHODS A systematic search of electronic databases was undertaken. An NMA was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-NMA guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using R and Shiny. RESULTS Twenty-two RCTs including 6890 patients were included. Overall, 49.6% of patients underwent LAG (3420/6890), 46.6% underwent OG (3212/6890), and 3.7% underwent RG (258/6890). At NMA, there was a no significant difference in recurrence rates following LAG (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.49) compared with OG. Similarly, overall survival (OS) outcomes were identical following OG and LAG (OS: OG, 87.0% [1652/1898] vs. LAG: OG, 87.0% [1650/1896]), with no differences in OS in meta-analysis (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.77-1.52). Importantly, patients undergoing LAG experienced reduced intraoperative blood loss, surgical incisions, distance from proximal margins, postoperative hospital stays, and morbidity post-resection. CONCLUSIONS LAG was associated with non-inferior oncological and surgical outcomes compared with OG. Surgical outcomes following LAG and RG superseded OG, with similar outcomes observed for both LAG and RG. Given these findings, minimally invasive approaches should be considered for the resection of local gastric cancer, once surgeon and institutional expertise allows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Davey
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland.
| | - Hugo C Temperley
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | - Niall J O'Sullivan
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | - Vianka Marcelino
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | - Odhrán K Ryan
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | - Éanna J Ryan
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | - Noel E Donlon
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Co Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | - Sean M Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Midlands University Hospital, Tullamore, Co. Offaly, Republic of Ireland
| | - William B Robb
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Co Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kawka M, Fong Y, Gall TMH. Laparoscopic versus robotic abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:6672-6681. [PMID: 37442833 PMCID: PMC10462573 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10275-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current evidence is inconclusive on whether robotic or laparoscopic surgery is the optimal platform for minimally invasive surgery. Existing comparisons techniques focus on short-term outcomes only, while potentially being confounded by a lack of standardisation in robotic procedures. There is a pertinent need for an up-to-date comparison between minimally invasive surgical techniques. We aimed to systematically review randomised controlled trials comparing robotic and laparoscopic techniques in major surgery. METHODS Embase, Medline and Cochrane Library were searched from their inception to 13th September 2022. Included studies were randomised controlled trials comparing robotic and laparoscopic techniques in abdominal and pelvic surgery. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Short-term, health-related quality of life, and long-term, outcomes were analysed. RESULTS Forty-five studies, across thirteen procedures, involving 7364 patients were included. All of the studies reported non-significant differences in mortality between robotic and laparoscopic surgery. In majority of studies, there was no significant difference in complication rate (n = 31/35, 85.6%), length of postoperative stay (n = 27/32, 84.4%), and conversion rate (n = 15/18, 83.3%). Laparoscopic surgery was associated with shorter operative time (n = 16/31, 51.6%) and lower total cost (n = 11/13, 84.6%). Twenty three studies reported on quality of life outcomes; majority (n = 14/23, 60.9%) found no significant differences. CONCLUSION There were no significant differences between robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery with regards to mortality and morbidity outcomes in the majority of studies. Robotic surgery was frequently associated with longer operative times and higher overall cost. Selected studies found potential benefits in post-operative recovery time, and patient-reported outcomes; however, these were not consistent across procedures and trials, with most studies being underpowered to detect differences in secondary outcomes. Future research should focus on assessing quality of life, and long-term outcomes to further elucidate where the robotic platform could lead to patient benefits, as the technology evolves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Kawka
- Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Yuman Fong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Tamara M H Gall
- Department of HPB Surgery, The Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bloom D, Catherall D, Miller N, Southworth MK, Glatz AC, Silva JR, Avari Silva JN. Use of a mixed reality system for navigational mapping during cardiac electrophysiological testing does not prolong case duration: A subanalysis from the Cardiac Augmented REality study. CARDIOVASCULAR DIGITAL HEALTH JOURNAL 2023; 4:111-117. [PMID: 37600447 PMCID: PMC10435945 DOI: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background CommandEP™ is a mixed reality (MXR) system for cardiac electrophysiological (EP) procedures that provides a real-time 3-dimensional digital image of cardiac geometry and catheter locations. In a previous study, physicians using the system demonstrated improved navigational accuracy. This study investigated the impact of the CommandEP system on EP procedural times compared to the standard-of-care electroanatomic mapping system (EAMS) display. Objective The purpose of this retrospective case-controlled analysis was to evaluate the impact of a novel MXR interface on EP procedural times compared to a case-matched cohort. Methods Cases from the Cardiac Augmented REality (CARE) study were matched for diagnosis and weight using a contemporary cohort. Procedural time was compared from the roll-in and full implementation cohort. During routine EP procedures, operators performed tasks during the postablation waiting phase, including creation of cardiac geometry and 5-point navigation under 2 conditions: (1) EAMS first; and (2) CommandEP. Results From a total of 16 CARE study patients, the 10 full implementation patients were matched to a cohort of 20 control patients (2 controls:1 CARE, matched according to pathology and age/weight). No statistical difference in total case times between CARE study patients vs control group (118 ± 29 minutes vs 97 ± 20 minutes; P = .07) or fluoroscopy times (6 ± 4 minutes vs 7 ± 6 minutes; P = .9). No significant difference in case duration for CARE study patients comparing roll-in vs full-implementation cohort (121 ± 26 minutes vs 118 ± 29 minutes; P = .96). CommandEP wear time during cases was significantly longer in full implementation cases (53 ± 24 minutes vs 24 ± 5 minutes; P = .0009). During creation of a single cardiac geometry, no significant time difference was noted between CommandEP vs EAMS (284 ± 45 seconds vs 268 ± 43 seconds; P = .1) or fluoroscopy use (9 ± 19 seconds vs 6 ± 18 seconds; P = .25). During point navigation tasks, there was no difference in total time (CommandEP 31 ± 14 seconds vs EAMS 28 ± 15 seconds; P = .16) or fluoroscopy time (CommandEP 0 second vs EAMS 0 second). Conclusion MXR did not prolong overall procedural time compared to a matched cohort. There was no prolongation in study task completion time. Future studies with experienced CommandEP users directly assessing procedural time and task completion time in a randomized study population would be of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Bloom
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - David Catherall
- School of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Nathan Miller
- Pediatric Cardiology/Electrophysiology, St. Louis Children’s Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Andrew C. Glatz
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jonathan R. Silva
- SentiAR, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri
- Department of Biomedical Engineering. Washington University in St. Louis, McKelvey School of Engineering, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jennifer N. Avari Silva
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
- SentiAR, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri
- Department of Biomedical Engineering. Washington University in St. Louis, McKelvey School of Engineering, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ramos-Carpinteyro R, Ferguson EL, Chavali JS, Geskin A, Soputro N, Kaouk J. Single-port Transvesical Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: The Surgical Learning Curve of the First 100 Cases. Urology 2023; 178:76-82. [PMID: 37302759 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the number of cases required to reach plateau performance. METHODS We performed a single-surgeon review of the first 100 consecutive procedures. All procedures were performed using the da Vinci single-port robotic system between November 2020 and March 2022. Time was used as the measure of the learning curve (LC). Relevant surgical steps were considered separately for detailed analysis. Data were collected retrospectively and analyzed through the cumulative sum method and moving average graphing. A comparative analysis was done between subgroups of 20 consecutive cases for perioperative outcomes. RESULTS All cases were completed successfully, without extra ports or conversion. The LC for prostate excision showed initial exponential improvement and reached plateau at case 28. Vesicourethral anastomosis time gradually shortened over time, with a clear inflection point at case 10. Total operative time rapidly improved and plateaued early to 213.0 minutes. Robot-docking and undocking, achieving hemostasis, wound closure, and intraoperative idle times were consistent throughout the series. Estimated blood loss decreased significantly after the first 20 cases (from median of 135.0-88.0 mL, P = .03). CONCLUSION In our early experience, the LC for single-port transvesical robot-assisted radical prostatectomy suggests that performance improved after 10-30 cases in the hands of an experienced robotic surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ethan L Ferguson
- Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jaya S Chavali
- Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Albert Geskin
- Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Nicolas Soputro
- Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jihad Kaouk
- Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Appel R, Shih L, Gimenez A, Bay C, Chai CYH, Maricevich M. Robotic Rectus Abdominis Harvest for Pelvic Reconstruction after Abdominoperineal Resection. Semin Plast Surg 2023; 37:188-192. [PMID: 38444961 PMCID: PMC10911893 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
The use of robotic surgical systems to perform abdominoperineal resection (APR) has recently become more prevalent. This minimally invasive approach produces fewer scars and potentially less morbidity for the patient. The rectus abdominis muscle is often used for reconstruction after APR if primary closure is not feasible or the surgical site is at high risk of wound complications. Since the traditional open harvest of this flap creates large incisions that negate the advantages of minimally invasive APR, there has been growing interest in harvesting the rectus abdominis in a similarly robotic fashion. This article reviews the technique, benefits, and limitations of this robotic technique. Compared to the traditional open harvest, robotic harvest of the rectus abdominis leaves smaller scars, provides technical benefits for the surgeon, and offers possible morbidity benefits for the patient. These advantages should be weighed against the added expense and learning curve inherent to robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Appel
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Linden Shih
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Alejandro Gimenez
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Caroline Bay
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Marco Maricevich
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pai SN, Jeyaraman M, Jeyaraman N, Nallakumarasamy A, Yadav S. In the Hands of a Robot, From the Operating Room to the Courtroom: The Medicolegal Considerations of Robotic Surgery. Cureus 2023; 15:e43634. [PMID: 37719624 PMCID: PMC10504870 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Robotic surgery has rapidly evolved as a groundbreaking field in medicine, revolutionizing surgical practices across various specialties. Despite its numerous benefits, the adoption of robotic surgery faces significant medicolegal challenges. This article delves into the underexplored legal implications of robotic surgery and identifies three distinct medicolegal problems. First, the lack of standardized training and credentialing for robotic surgery poses potential risks to patient safety and surgeon competence. Second, informed consent processes require additional considerations to ensure patients are fully aware of the technology's capabilities and potential risks. Finally, the issue of legal liability becomes complex due to the involvement of multiple stakeholders in the functioning of robotic systems. The article highlights the need for comprehensive guidelines, regulations, and training programs to navigate the medicolegal aspects of robotic surgery effectively, thereby unlocking its full potential for the future..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satvik N Pai
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine, Arthritis, and Trauma (HOSMAT) Hospital, Bangalore, IND
| | - Madhan Jeyaraman
- Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, IND
| | - Naveen Jeyaraman
- Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, IND
| | - Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy
- Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, IND
| | - Sankalp Yadav
- Medicine, Shri Madan Lal Khurana Chest Clinic, New Delhi, IND
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hashemi N, Svendsen MBS, Bjerrum F, Rasmussen S, Tolsgaard MG, Friis ML. Acquisition and usage of robotic surgical data for machine learning analysis. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-10214-7. [PMID: 37389741 PMCID: PMC10338401 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10214-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing use of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has led to the need for new methods of assessing whether new surgeons are qualified to perform RAS, without the resource-demanding process of having expert surgeons do the assessment. Computer-based automation and artificial intelligence (AI) are seen as promising alternatives to expert-based surgical assessment. However, no standard protocols or methods for preparing data and implementing AI are available for clinicians. This may be among the reasons for the impediment to the use of AI in the clinical setting. METHOD We tested our method on porcine models with both the da Vinci Si and the da Vinci Xi. We sought to capture raw video data from the surgical robots and 3D movement data from the surgeons and prepared the data for the use in AI by a structured guide to acquire and prepare video data using the following steps: 'Capturing image data from the surgical robot', 'Extracting event data', 'Capturing movement data of the surgeon', 'Annotation of image data'. RESULTS 15 participant (11 novices and 4 experienced) performed 10 different intraabdominal RAS procedures. Using this method we captured 188 videos (94 from the surgical robot, and 94 corresponding movement videos of the surgeons' arms and hands). Event data, movement data, and labels were extracted from the raw material and prepared for use in AI. CONCLUSION With our described methods, we could collect, prepare, and annotate images, events, and motion data from surgical robotic systems in preparation for its use in AI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasseh Hashemi
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
- Nordsim-Centre for Skills Training and Simulation, Aalborg, Denmark.
- ROCnord-Robot Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
- Department of Urology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
| | - Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Center for Human Resources and Education, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Flemming Bjerrum
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Center for Human Resources and Education, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Sten Rasmussen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Martin G Tolsgaard
- Nordsim-Centre for Skills Training and Simulation, Aalborg, Denmark
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Center for Human Resources and Education, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Lønborg Friis
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Nordsim-Centre for Skills Training and Simulation, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Fukushi R, Teramoto A, Yoshimoto M, Miyakoshi N, Kudo D, Emori M, Shimada Y, Yamashita T. How Much Experience is Required to Acquire the Skills to Independently Perform Spine Surgery? What Milestones are Needed for Successful Surgery? ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 2023; 14:657-667. [PMID: 37404867 PMCID: PMC10315144 DOI: 10.2147/amep.s411047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To assess the number of surgeries needed to acquire the necessary skills to perform spine surgery independently. Patients and Methods A questionnaire on 12 different spinal procedures was sent to orthopedic surgeons affiliated with the spine teams of orthopedic departments at either the Akita University or Sapporo Medical University. Participants were asked to identify whether they (A) could independently perform each procedure, (B) could perform each procedure with the assistance of a senior doctor, or (C) were unable to perform each procedure. Those whose response was (A) were asked how many surgeries were required to acquire the necessary skills. Those who responded to (B) or (C) were asked how many surgeries they believed were required to acquire the skills necessary to operate independently. Participants also responded to 10 questions on surgical training techniques and rated the usefulness of each method. Results A total of 55 spine surgeons responded to the questionnaire. Group A required significantly fewer surgeries in the following categories to become independent than required Group C: upper cervical spine surgery (7.3/19.3), anterior cervical decompression/fusion (6.7/28.8), posterior cervical decompression/fusion (9.5/27.3), lumbar discectomy (12.6/26.7), endoscopic lumbar discectomy (10.2/24.2), spinal tumor resection (6.5/37.2), and spinal kyphosis surgery (10.3/32.3). Over 80% of participants responded that the following were effective methods: "surgeries where a senior doctor is the main surgeon, and the respondent is the assistant and observer"; "surgeries where the respondent is the main surgeon, and a senior doctor is an assistant"; "self-study using surgery manuals, articles, and textbooks"; and "training through video surgery sessions". Conclusion Surgeons who do not perform specific procedures independently require more surgical experience than those who operate independently. Our results may help develop more efficient training methods for spine surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryunosuke Fukushi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Teramoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Mitsunori Yoshimoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Naohisa Miyakoshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akita University School, Akita, Japan
| | - Daisuke Kudo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akita University School, Akita, Japan
| | - Makoto Emori
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoichi Shimada
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akita University School, Akita, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Yamashita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Pickering OJ, van Boxel GI, Carter NC, Mercer SJ, Knight BC, Pucher PH. Learning curve for adoption of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review of oncological, clinical, and efficiency outcomes. Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:6961031. [PMID: 36572404 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is gaining increasing popularity as an operative approach. Learning curves to achieve surgical competency in robotic-assisted techniques have shown significant variation in learning curve lengths and outcomes. This study aimed to summarize the current literature on learning curves for RAMIE. METHODS A systematic review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were searched, and articles reporting on learning curves in RAMIE were identified and scrutinized. Studies were eligible if they reported changes in operative outcomes over time, or learning curves, for surgeons newly adopting RAMIE. RESULTS Fifteen studies reporting on 1767 patients were included. Nine studies reported on surgeons with prior experience of robot-assisted surgery prior to adopting RAMIE, with only four studies outlining a specified RAMIE adoption pathway. Learning curves were most commonly analyzed using cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) and were typically reported for lymph node yields and operative times, with significant variation in learning curve lengths (18-73 cases and 20-80 cases, respectively). Most studies reported adoption without significant impact on clinical outcomes such as anastomotic leak; significant learning curves were more likely in studies, which did not report a formal learning or adoption pathway. CONCLUSION Reported RAMIE adoption phases are variable, with some authors suggesting significant impact to patients. With robust training through formal programmes or proctorship, however, others report RAMIE adoption without impact on clinical outcomes. A formalized adoption curriculum appears critical to prevent adverse effects on operative efficiency and patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver J Pickering
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Gijs I van Boxel
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University Hospital Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Nick C Carter
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University Hospital Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Stuart J Mercer
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University Hospital Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Benjamin C Knight
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University Hospital Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Philip H Pucher
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University Hospital Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
- Department of Pharmacology and Biosciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Irfan A, Cochrun S, He K, Okorji L, Parmar AD. Towards identifying a learning curve for robotic abdominal wall reconstruction: a cumulative sum analysis. Hernia 2023; 27:671-676. [PMID: 37160504 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02794-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over the past decade, an increase has been seen in robotics used for hernia repair, specifically robotic abdominal wall reconstruction (rAWR). However, the learning curve for rAWR can be steep and presently, little is understood regarding the optimal case volume required to achieve proficiency. The aim of our study was to review skill acquisition and describe the learning curve for rAWR. METHODS A retrospective, single-surgeon case series of consecutive patients who underwent rAWR from 2018 to 2022. The primary outcome was operative time, obtained from console time identified through the MyIntutive application. A one-sided cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) curve for the total operative time was derived based on the mean operative time of chronological procedures (207 min). RESULTS 185 patients underwent rAWR between 2018 and 2022. These patients were more likely to be female, Caucasian, and have undergone two previous hernia repairs. ASA complexity increased over time with ASA 3 being predominant from 2020 onwards. The median hernia length was 15.0 cm and the median width was 7 cm. Average operative time was 207.8 min and decreased over time. The CUSUM analysis identified four phases of skill acquisition with the following case volumes: Initial Learning Curve (0-20), Stabilization Phase (21-55), Second Learning Curve (56-70), 4) Skill Proficiency (> 70). CONCLUSION In the early learning curve of rAWR, operative time decreased consistently after 70 cases, with an initial inflection after 20 cases. We identified varying stages of skill acquisition that are likely typical of a surgeon as they would progress through the learning curve of advanced robotic surgery. Future studies are needed to confirm the optimal case volume for determining the skill level for the performance of rAWR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Irfan
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Avenue South, Boshell Diabetes Building #525, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - S Cochrun
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Avenue South, Boshell Diabetes Building #525, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - K He
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Avenue South, Boshell Diabetes Building #525, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - L Okorji
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Avenue South, Boshell Diabetes Building #525, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Abhishek D Parmar
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Avenue South, Boshell Diabetes Building #525, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Davey MG, Ryan ÉJ, Donlon NE, Ryan OK, Al Azzawi M, Boland MR, Kerin MJ, Lowery AJ. Comparing surgical outcomes of approaches to adrenalectomy - a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:180. [PMID: 37145303 PMCID: PMC10163131 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02911-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No randomised clinical trials (RCTs) have simultaneously compared the safety of open (OA), transperitoneal laparoscopic (TLA), posterior retroperitoneal (PRA), and robotic adrenalectomy (RA) for resecting adrenal tumours. AIM To evaluate outcomes for OA, TLA, PRA, and RA from RCTs. METHODS A NMA was performed according to PRISMA-NMA guidelines. Analysis was performed using R packages and Shiny. RESULTS Eight RCTs with 488 patients were included (mean age: 48.9 years). Overall, 44.5% of patients underwent TLA (217/488), 37.3% underwent PRA (182/488), 16.4% underwent RA (80/488), and just 1.8% patients underwent OA (9/488). The mean tumour size was 35 mm in largest diameter with mean sizes of 44.3 mm for RA, 40.9 mm for OA, 35.5 mm for TLA, and 34.4 mm for PRA (P < 0.001). TLA had the lowest blood loss (mean: 50.6 ml), complication rates (12.4%, 14/113), and conversion to open rates (1.3%, 2/157), while PRA had the shortest intra-operative duration (mean: 94 min), length of hospital stay (mean: 3.7 days), lowest visual analogue scale pain scores post-operatively (mean: 3.7), and was most cost-effective (mean: 1728 euros per case). At NMA, there was a significant increase in blood loss for OA (mean difference (MD): 117.00 ml (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.41-230.00)) with similar blood loss observed for PRA (MD: - 10.50 (95% CI: - 83.40-65.90)) compared to TLA. CONCLUSION LTA and PRA are important contemporary options in achieving favourable outcomes following adrenalectomy. The next generation of RCTs may be more insightful for comparison surgical outcomes following RA, as this approach is likely to play a future role in minimally invasive adrenalectomy. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42022301005.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Davey
- Discipline of Surgery, The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91YR71, Ireland.
- Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, H91YR71, Republic of Ireland.
| | - Éanna J Ryan
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, D02YN77, Ireland
| | - Noel E Donlon
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, D02YN77, Ireland
| | - Odhrán K Ryan
- Surgical Professorial Unit, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, D04 T6F4, Ireland
| | - Mohammed Al Azzawi
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, D02YN77, Ireland
| | - Michael R Boland
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, D02YN77, Ireland
| | - Michael J Kerin
- Discipline of Surgery, The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91YR71, Ireland
| | - Aoife J Lowery
- Discipline of Surgery, The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91YR71, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
The Availability, Cost, Limitations, Learning Curve and Future of Robotic Systems in Urology and Prostate Cancer Surgery. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12062268. [PMID: 36983269 PMCID: PMC10053304 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgical systems (RASS) have revolutionised the management of many urological conditions over the last two decades with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) now being considered by many to be the preferred surgical approach. Intuitive Surgical has dominated the market during this time period with successive iterations of the da Vinci model. The expiration of patents has opened the RASS market and several new contenders have become available or are currently in development. This comprehensive narrative review aims to explore the merits of each robotic system as well as the evidence and barriers to their use. The newly developed RASS have increased the versality of robotic surgical systems to a wider range of settings through advancement in technology. The increased competition may result in an overall reduction in cost, broadening the accessibility of RASS. Learning curves and training remain a barrier to their use, but the situation appears to be improving through dedicated training programmes. Outcomes for RARP have been well investigated and tend to support improved early functional outcomes. Overall, the rapid developments in the field of robot-assisted surgery indicate the beginning of a promising new era to further enhance urological surgery.
Collapse
|
36
|
A novel assessment model for teaching robot-assisted living donor nephrectomy in abdominal transplant surgery fellowship. Am J Surg 2023; 225:420-424. [PMID: 36253318 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.09.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing number of transplant centers have adopted robot-assisted living donor nephrectomy. Thus, a transplant fellow assessment tool is needed for promoting operative independence in an objective and safe manner. METHODS In this pilot study, data was prospectively collected on both fellow performance with focus on technique, efficiency, and communication ("overall RO-SCORE"), and operative steps ("operative steps RO-SCORE"). Robotic user performance metrics were analyzed from the da Vinci Xi system, including fellow percent active control time (ACT) and handoff counts. RESULTS From July 2020 to February 2021, twenty-one robot-assisted donor nephrectomies were performed. In regression analysis, fellow performance (based on both RO-SCOREs and robot % ACT) was significantly associated with both time and case number, with time-to-independence modelled at 8.4-14.2 months, and case number-to-independence estimated at 15-22 cases. Robot user metrics provided valid objective measures alongside RO-SCOREs. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study provides an effective assessment tool for promoting operative competency in robot-assisted donor nephrectomy among transplant fellows.
Collapse
|
37
|
Wilson-Smith AR, Anning N, Muston B, Eranki A, Williams ML, Wilson-Smith CJ, Rivas DG, Yan TD. The learning curve of the robotic-assisted lobectomy-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2023; 12:1-8. [PMID: 36793987 PMCID: PMC9922770 DOI: 10.21037/acs-2022-urats-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Background Early studies have illustrated the robotic lobectomy to be safe, oncologically effective, and economically feasible as a therapeutic modality in the treatment of thoracic malignancies. The 'challenging' learning curve seemingly associated with the robotic approach, however, continues to be an often-cited factor to its ongoing uptake, with the overwhelming volume of these surgeries being performed in centers of excellence where extensive experience with minimal access surgery is the norm. An exact quantification of this learning curve challenge, however, has not been made, begging the question of whether this is an outdated assumption, versus fact. This systematic review and meta-analysis sort to clarify the learning curve for robotic-assisted lobectomy based on the existing literature. Methods An electronic search of four databases was performed to identify relevant studies outlining the learning curve of robotic lobectomy. The primary endpoint was a clear definition of operator learning (e.g., cumulative sum chart, linear regression, outcome-specific analysis, etc.) which could be subsequently aggregated or reported. Secondary endpoints of interest included post-operative outcomes and complication rates. A meta-analysis using a random effects model of proportions or means was applied, as appropriate. Results The search strategy identified twenty-two studies relevant for inclusion. A total of 3,246 patients (30% male) receiving robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) were identified. The mean age of the cohort was 65.3±5.0 years. Mean operative, console and dock time was 190.5±53.8, 125.8±33.9 and 10.2±4.0 minutes, respectively. Length of hospital stay was 6.1±4.6 days. Technical proficiency with the robotic-assisted lobectomy was achieved at a mean of 25.3±12.6 cases. Conclusions The robotic-assisted lobectomy has been illustrated to have a reasonable learning curve profile based on the existing literature. Current evidence on the oncologic efficacy and purported benefits of the robotic approach will be bolstered by the results of upcoming randomized trials, which will be critical in supporting RATS uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley R. Wilson-Smith
- The Chris O’Brien Lifehouse Center, Sydney, Australia;,The Collaborative Research Group (CORE), Sydney, Australia;,The Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), Newcastle, Australia;,Department of Vascular Surgery, The John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Naomi Anning
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia
| | | | | | - Michael L. Williams
- The Collaborative Research Group (CORE), Sydney, Australia;,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Dunedin Public Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | | - Diego G. Rivas
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Unit (UCTMI), Coruña University Hospital, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Tristan D. Yan
- The Chris O’Brien Lifehouse Center, Sydney, Australia;,The Collaborative Research Group (CORE), Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
de’Angelis N, Marchegiani F, Schena CA, Khan J, Agnoletti V, Ansaloni L, Barría Rodríguez AG, Bianchi PP, Biffl W, Bravi F, Ceccarelli G, Ceresoli M, Chiara O, Chirica M, Cobianchi L, Coccolini F, Coimbra R, Cotsoglou C, D’Hondt M, Damaskos D, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Diana M, Espin‐Basany E, Fichtner‐Feigl S, Fugazzola P, Gavriilidis P, Gronnier C, Kashuk J, Kirkpatrick AW, Ammendola M, Kouwenhoven EA, Laurent A, Leppaniemi A, Lesurtel M, Memeo R, Milone M, Moore E, Pararas N, Peitzmann A, Pessaux P, Picetti E, Pikoulis M, Pisano M, Ris F, Robison T, Sartelli M, Shelat VG, Spinoglio G, Sugrue M, Tan E, Van Eetvelde E, Kluger Y, Weber D, Catena F. Training curriculum in minimally invasive emergency digestive surgery: 2022 WSES position paper. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:11. [PMID: 36707879 PMCID: PMC9883976 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00476-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including laparoscopic and robotic approaches, is widely adopted in elective digestive surgery, but selectively used for surgical emergencies. The present position paper summarizes the available evidence concerning the learning curve to achieve proficiency in emergency MIS and provides five expert opinion statements, which may form the basis for developing standardized curricula and training programs in emergency MIS. METHODS This position paper was conducted according to the World Society of Emergency Surgery methodology. A steering committee and an international expert panel were involved in the critical appraisal of the literature and the development of the consensus statements. RESULTS Thirteen studies regarding the learning curve in emergency MIS were selected. All but one study considered laparoscopic appendectomy. Only one study reported on emergency robotic surgery. In most of the studies, proficiency was achieved after an average of 30 procedures (range: 20-107) depending on the initial surgeon's experience. High heterogeneity was noted in the way the learning curve was assessed. The experts claim that further studies investigating learning curve processes in emergency MIS are needed. The emergency surgeon curriculum should include a progressive and adequate training based on simulation, supervised clinical practice (proctoring), and surgical fellowships. The results should be evaluated by adopting a credentialing system to ensure quality standards. Surgical proficiency should be maintained with a minimum caseload and constantly evaluated. Moreover, the training process should involve the entire surgical team to facilitate the surgeon's proficiency. CONCLUSIONS Limited evidence exists concerning the learning process in laparoscopic and robotic emergency surgery. The proposed statements should be seen as a preliminary guide for the surgical community while stressing the need for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola de’Angelis
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, Paris, France ,grid.410511.00000 0001 2149 7878Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Francesco Marchegiani
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, Paris, France
| | - Carlo Alberto Schena
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, Paris, France
| | - Jim Khan
- grid.4701.20000 0001 0728 6636Department of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University of Portsmouth, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- grid.414682.d0000 0004 1758 8744Intensive Care Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- grid.419425.f0000 0004 1760 3027Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Pietro Bianchi
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Walter Biffl
- grid.415402.60000 0004 0449 3295Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Francesca Bravi
- grid.415207.50000 0004 1760 3756Healthcare Administration, Santa Maria Delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Italy
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- grid.7563.70000 0001 2174 1754General and Emergency Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Monza, Italy
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Niguarda Milano, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mircea Chirica
- grid.450307.50000 0001 0944 2786Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Michallon Hospital, Grenoble University, Grenoble, France
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- grid.419425.f0000 0004 1760 3027Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy ,grid.8982.b0000 0004 1762 5736Department of Clinical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- grid.144189.10000 0004 1756 8209General, Emergency and Trauma Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Raul Coimbra
- grid.488519.90000 0004 5946 0028Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Riverside, CA USA
| | | | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Dimitris Damaskos
- grid.418716.d0000 0001 0709 1919Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of General and Metabolic Surgery, Poissy and Saint‐Germain‐en‐Laye Hospitals, Poissy, France
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Unit of General Surgery, San Benedetto del Tronto Hospital, av5 Asur Marche, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Michele Diana
- grid.11843.3f0000 0001 2157 9291Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ,grid.420397.b0000 0000 9635 7370IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, Strasbourg, France
| | - Eloy Espin‐Basany
- grid.7080.f0000 0001 2296 0625Department of General Surgery, Hospital Valle de Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefan Fichtner‐Feigl
- grid.7708.80000 0000 9428 7911Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- grid.419425.f0000 0004 1760 3027Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Paschalis Gavriilidis
- grid.15628.380000 0004 0393 1193Department of HBP Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX UK
| | - Caroline Gronnier
- grid.42399.350000 0004 0593 7118Eso-Gastric Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Magellan Center, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Jeffry Kashuk
- grid.12136.370000 0004 1937 0546Department of Surgery, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Andrew W. Kirkpatrick
- grid.414959.40000 0004 0469 2139Department of General, Acute Care, Abdominal Wall Reconstruction, and Trauma Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Michele Ammendola
- grid.411489.10000 0001 2168 2547Digestive Surgery Unit, Health of Science Department, “Magna Graecia” University Medical School, “Mater Domini” Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Ewout A. Kouwenhoven
- grid.417370.60000 0004 0502 0983Department of Surgery, Hospital Group Twente ZGT, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - Alexis Laurent
- grid.410511.00000 0001 2149 7878Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France ,grid.412116.10000 0004 1799 3934Unit of HPB and Service of General Surgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Ari Leppaniemi
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- grid.415844.80000 0004 1759 7181Unit of Hepato‐Pancreato‐Biliary Surgery, General Regional Hospital “F. Miulli”, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- grid.4691.a0000 0001 0790 385XDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II” University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Ernest Moore
- grid.241116.10000000107903411Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO USA
| | - Nikolaos Pararas
- grid.5216.00000 0001 2155 08003Rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Andrew Peitzmann
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- grid.11843.3f0000 0001 2157 9291Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ,grid.480511.9Institute for Image‐Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ,Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, INSERM U1110, Strasbourg, France
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- grid.411482.aDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Manos Pikoulis
- grid.5216.00000 0001 2155 08003Rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Michele Pisano
- 1St General Surgery Unit, Department of Emergency, ASST Papa Giovanni Hospital Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Frederic Ris
- grid.150338.c0000 0001 0721 9812Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Tyler Robison
- grid.5288.70000 0000 9758 5690Minimally Invasive Surgery Fellow, Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR USA
| | | | - Vishal G. Shelat
- grid.240988.f0000 0001 0298 8161Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Giuseppe Spinoglio
- grid.420397.b0000 0000 9635 7370IRCAD Faculty Member Robotic and Colorectal Surgery‐ IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
| | - Michael Sugrue
- grid.415900.90000 0004 0617 6488Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Edward Tan
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Ellen Van Eetvelde
- grid.411326.30000 0004 0626 3362Department of Digestive Surgery, UZ, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Rambam Healthcare Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Dieter Weber
- grid.416195.e0000 0004 0453 3875Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Fausto Catena
- grid.414682.d0000 0004 1758 8744Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital‐Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Burghgraef TA, Sikkenk DJ, Crolla RMPH, Fahim M, Melenhorst J, Moumni ME, Schelling GVD, Smits AB, Stassen LPS, Verheijen PM, Consten ECJ. Assessing the learning curve of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: a multicenter study considering procedural safety, pathological safety, and efficiency. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:9. [PMID: 36630001 PMCID: PMC9834356 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04303-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evidence regarding the learning curve of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision is scarce and of low quality. Case-mix is mostly not taken into account, and learning curves are based on operative time, while preferably clinical outcomes and literature-based limits should be used. Therefore, this study aims to assess the learning curve of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision. METHODS A retrospective study was performed in four Dutch centers. The primary aim was to assess the safety of the individual and institutional learning curves using a RA-CUSUM analysis based on intraoperative complications, major postoperative complications, and compound pathological outcome (positive circumferential margin or incomplete TME specimen). The learning curve for efficiency was assessed using a LC-CUSUM analysis for operative time. Outcomes of patients before and after the learning curve were compared. RESULTS In this study, seven participating surgeons performed robot-assisted total mesorectal excisions in 531 patients. Learning curves for intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and compound pathological outcome did not exceed predefined literature-based limits. The LC-CUSUM for operative time showed lengths of the learning curve ranging from 12 to 35 cases. Intraoperative, postoperative, and pathological outcomes did not differ between patients operated during and after the learning curve. CONCLUSION The learning curve of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision based on intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and compound pathological outcome did not exceed predefined limits and is therefore suggested to be safe. Using operative time as a surrogate for efficiency, the learning curve is estimated to be between 12 and 35 procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T A Burghgraef
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
| | - D J Sikkenk
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - R M P H Crolla
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - M Fahim
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - J Melenhorst
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M El Moumni
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - A B Smits
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - L P S Stassen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - P M Verheijen
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - E C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Green CA, Lin JA, Huang E, O'Sullivan P, Higgins RM. Enhancing robotic efficiency through the eyes of robotic surgeons: sub-analysis of the expertise in perception during robotic surgery (ExPeRtS) study. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:571-579. [PMID: 35579701 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09315-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic technology affords surgeons many novel and useful features, but two stereotypes continue to prevail: robotic surgery is expensive and inefficient. To identify educational opportunities and improve operative efficiency, we analyzed expert commentary on videos of robotic surgery. METHODS Expert robotic surgeons, identified through high case volumes and contributions to the surgical literature, reviewed eight anonymous video clips portraying key portions of two robotic general surgery procedures. While watching, surgeons commented on what they saw on the screen. All interactions with participants were in person, recorded, transcribed, and subsequently analyzed. Using content analysis, researchers double-coded each transcript applying a consensus developed codebook. RESULTS Seventeen surgeons participated. The average participant was male (82.4%), 47 (SD = 6.6) years old, had 13.2 (SD = 8.23) years of teaching experience, worked in urban academic hospitals (64.7%) and had performed 643 (SD = 467) robotic operations at the time of interviews. Emphasis on efficiency (or lack thereof) surfaced across three main themes: overall case progression, robotic capabilities, and instrumentation. Experts verbally rewarded purposeful and "ergonomically sound" movements while language reflecting impatience with repetitive and indecisive movements was attributed to presumed inexperience. Efficient robotic capabilities included enhanced visualization, additional robotic arms to improve exposure, and wristed instruments. Finally, experts discussed instrument selection with regards to energy modality, safety features, cost, and versatility. CONCLUSION This study highlights three areas for improved efficiency: case progression, robotic capabilities, and instrumentation. Development of education materials within these themes could help surgical educators overcome one of robotic technology's persistent challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney A Green
- Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Critical Care and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - Joseph A Lin
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, S-321, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0470, USA
| | - Emily Huang
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Suite 670, 395 W. 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210-1267, USA
| | - Patricia O'Sullivan
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, S-321, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0470, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Room M994, San Francisco, CA, 94122, USA
| | - Rana M Higgins
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Takano T, Ikeda A, Abe I, Kikuchi T. Improvement of Haptic Interface for Teleoperation Endoscopic Surgery Simulators Using Magnetorheological Fluid Devices. JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS AND MECHATRONICS 2022. [DOI: 10.20965/jrm.2022.p1268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
A magnetorheological (MR) fluid is a composite material comprising ferromagnetic particles, medium oils, and several types of additives. We developed an MR fluid clutch for haptics (H-MRC) and installed it in a haptic interface that simulates teleoperation endoscopic surgery (ES). To enhance its operability, we redesigned the H-MRC to reduce its weight and improve its control system. We reduced the weight of the H-MRC and haptic gripper by 77.0 g and 137.0 g, respectively. To evaluate the influence of the improvement and force feedback functions on remote operation skills, we conducted pick-and-place tests with a remotely controlled system. In the tests, we subjectively evaluated the NASA-TLX and quantitatively evaluated the success rate of the task. The results of the subjective assessment showed significant reductions in mental stress during the teleoperation task. In addition, the results of the quantitative evaluation showed that the force feedback function was effective against the teleoperation skills of the operators.
Collapse
|
42
|
Han S, Du S, Jander C, Kuppusamy M, Sternbach J, Low DE, Hubka M. The impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for video-assisted and robotic-assisted lobectomy on surgical outcomes and costs: a retrospective single-center cohort study. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:1039-1048. [PMID: 36515818 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01487-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
To determine the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway implementation on outcomes and cost of robotic- and video-assisted thoracoscopic (RATS and VATS) lobectomy. Retrospective review of 116 consecutive VATS and RATS lobectomies in the pre-ERAS (Oct 2018-Sep 2019) and ERAS (Oct 2019-Sep 2020) period. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the impact of ERAS and operative approach alone, and in combination, on length of hospital stay (LOS) and overall cost. Operative approach was 49.1% VATS, 50.9% RATS, with 44.8% pre-ERAS, and 55.2% ERAS (median age 68, 65.5% female). ERAS patients had shorter LOS (2.22 vs 3.45 days) and decreased total cost ($15,022 vs $20,155) compared with non-ERAS patients, while RATS was associated with decreased LOS (2.16 vs 4.19 days) and decreased total cost ($14,729 vs $20,484) compared with VATS. The combination of ERAS + RATS showed the shortest LOS and the lowest total cost (1.35 days and $13,588, P < 0.001 vs other combinations). On multivariate analysis, ERAS significantly decreased LOS (P = 0.001) and total cost (P = 0.003) compared with pre-ERAS patients; RATS significantly decreased LOS (P < 0.001) and total cost (P = 0.004) compared with VATS approach. ERAS implementation and robotic approach were independently associated with LOS reduction and cost savings in patients undergoing minimally invasive lobectomy. A combination of ERAS and RATS approach synergistically decreases LOS and overall cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiwei Han
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | - Simo Du
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christina Jander
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | - Madhan Kuppusamy
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | - Joel Sternbach
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | - Donald E Low
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | - Michal Hubka
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Larkins KM, Mohan HM, Gray M, Costello DM, Costello AJ, Heriot AG, Warrier SK. Transferability of robotic console skills by early robotic surgeons: a multi-platform crossover trial of simulation training. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:859-867. [DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01475-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AbstractRobotic surgical training is undergoing a period of transition now that new robotic operating platforms are entering clinical practice. As this occurs, training will need to be adapted to include strategies to train across various consoles. These new consoles differ in multiple ways, with some new vendors using flat screen open source 3D enhanced vision with glasses and differences in design will require surgeons to learn new skills. This process has parallels with aviation credentialling across different aircraft described as type rating. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that technical robotic console operating skills are transferrable across different robotic operating platforms. Ten participants sequentially completed four Mimic®(Surgical Science) simulation exercises on two different robotic operating platforms (DaVinci®, Intuitive Surgical and HUGO™ RAS, Medtronic). Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained for this study. Groups were balanced for key demographics including previous robotic simulator experience. Data for simulation metrics and time to proficiency were collected for each attempt at the simulated exercise and analysed. Qualitative feedback on multi-platform learning was sought via unstructured interviews and a questionnaire. Participants were divided into two groups of 5. Group 1 completed the simulation exercises on console A first then repeated these exercises on console B. Group 2 completed the simulated exercises on console B first then repeated these exercises on console A. Group 1 candidates adapted quicker to the second console and Group 2 candidates reached proficiency faster on the first console. Participants were slower on the second attempt of the final exercise regardless of their allocated group. Quality and efficiency metrics and risk and safety metrics were equivalent across consoles. The data from this investigation suggests that console operating skills are transferrable across different platforms. Overall risk and safety metrics are within acceptable limits regardless of the order of progression of console indicating that training can safely occur across multiple consoles contemporaneously. This data has implications for the design of training and certification as new platforms progress to market and supports a proficiency-based approach.
Collapse
|
44
|
Harke NN, Kuczyk MA, Huusmann S, Schiefelbein F, Schneller A, Schoen G, Wiesinger C, Pfuner J, Ubrig B, Gloger S, Osmonov D, Eraky A, Witt JH, Liakos N, Wagner C, Hadaschik BA, Radtke JP, Al Nader M, Imkamp F, Siemer S, Stöckle M, Zeuschner P. Impact of Surgical Experience Before Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy on Surgical Outcomes: A Multicenter Analysis of 2500 Patients. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 46:45-52. [PMID: 36506259 PMCID: PMC9732453 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a challenging procedure that is influenced by a multitude of factors. Objective To assess the impact of prior surgical experience on perioperative outcomes in RAPN. Design setting and participants In this retrospective multicenter study, results for 2548 RAPNs performed by 25 surgeons at eight robotic referral centers were analyzed. Perioperative data for all consecutive RAPNs from the start of each individual surgeon's experience were collected, as well as the number of prior open or laparoscopic kidney surgeries, pelvic surgeries (open, laparoscopic, robotic), and other robotic interventions. Intervention Transperitoneal or retroperitoneal RAPN. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The impact of prior surgical experience on operative time, warm ischemia time (WIT), major complications, and margin, ischemia, complication (MIC) score (negative surgical margins, WIT ≤20 min, no major complications) was assessed via univariate and multivariable regression analyses accounting for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists score, PADUA score, and RAPN experience. Results and limitations BMI, PADUA score, and surgical experience in RAPN had a strong impact on perioperative outcomes. A plateau effect for the learning curve was not observed. Prior laparoscopic kidney surgery significantly reduced the operative time (p < 0.001) and WIT (p < 0.001) and improved the MIC rate (p = 0.022). A greater number of prior robotic pelvic interventions decreased WIT (p = 0.011) and the rate of major complications (p < 0.001) and increased the MIC rate (p = 0.011), while prior experience in open kidney surgery did not. One limitation is the short-term follow-up. Conclusions Mastering of RAPN is an ongoing learning process. However, prior experience in laparoscopic kidney and robot-assisted pelvic surgery seems to improve perioperative outcomes for surgeons when starting with RAPN, while experience in open surgery might not be crucial. Patient summary In this multicenter analysis, we found that a high degree of experience in keyhole kidney surgery and robot-assisted pelvic surgery helps surgeons in achieving good initial outcomes when starting robot-assisted kidney surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina N. Harke
- Department of Urology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany,Corresponding author. Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Tel. +49 511 532 5847; Fax +49 511 532 5634.
| | - Markus A. Kuczyk
- Department of Urology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stephan Huusmann
- Department of Urology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank Schiefelbein
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Wuerzburg Mitte-Missioklinik, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneller
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Wuerzburg Mitte-Missioklinik, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Georg Schoen
- Department of Urology, Urologische Klinik Muenchen-Planegg, Planegg, Germany
| | - Clemens Wiesinger
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen GmbH, Wels, Austria
| | - Jacob Pfuner
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen GmbH, Wels, Austria
| | - Burkhard Ubrig
- Department of Urology, Augusta-Kranken-Anstalt Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Simon Gloger
- Department of Urology, Augusta-Kranken-Anstalt Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Daniar Osmonov
- Department of Urology, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ahmed Eraky
- Department of Urology, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jörn H. Witt
- Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital Gronau, Gronau, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Liakos
- Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital Gronau, Gronau, Germany
| | - Christian Wagner
- Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital Gronau, Gronau, Germany
| | | | | | - Mulham Al Nader
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Imkamp
- Department of Urology, Vinzenzkrankenhaus Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stefan Siemer
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Philip Zeuschner
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Yao R, Yan M, Liang Q, Wang H, Liu Z, Li F, Zhang H, Li K, Sun F. Clinical efficacy and learning curve of posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical laminoforaminotomy for patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30401. [PMID: 36086740 PMCID: PMC10980377 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and learning curve of posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical laminoforaminotomy (PPECLF) in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). A total of 64 patients with CSR received PPECLF. Clinical outcome scores included the visual analog scale, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, neck disability index, and modified Macnab criteria. Radiological outcomes included the disc height, C2 to C7 Cobb angle, and range of motion. The learning curve was evaluated using cumulative sum analysis. Patients were divided into accumulation phase and mastery phase groups (A and B), and general data and surgical efficacy were compared between the 2 groups. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 24 months. Clinical outcome scores improved significantly at the final follow-up, and there were no differences in radiological outcomes. Surgical efficacy was excellent and good in 82.8% of patients. The operative time showed a decreasing trend with the accumulation of cases. Patients were divided and the 26th case was the cutoff point according to the learning curve. No significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. Decompression with PPECLF was safe and effective in the treatment of CSR. With the accumulation of cases, the operative time was gradually shortened, and the clinical efficacy was significant. The PPECLF procedure can be performed efficiently and safely to treat CSR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Yao
- The No.2 Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Yan
- Department of Spinal Surgery, First Hospital of Bethune, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Qingchen Liang
- The No.2 Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongqing Wang
- The No.2 Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zuyao Liu
- The No.2 Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Fu Li
- The No.2 Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- The No.2 Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ke Li
- The No.2 Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Fenglong Sun
- The No.2 Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Watanabe T. Effect of button layout on the exploration and learning of robot operation using an unfamiliar controller. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0272782. [PMID: 36054107 PMCID: PMC9439237 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Robots are becoming increasingly accessible to both experts and non-experts. Therefore, establishing a method for learning robot operations that can be easily mastered by non-experts is important. With this in mind, we aimed to develop a method that facilitates skill acquisition for non-experts that operate robots. As a first step, this study examined the effects of button layout on the exploration and learning of robot operations. A humanoid robot was operated using an unfamiliar tablet-based user interface to achieve the task of shifting the robot’s posture to the desired posture: single-foot-standing. The process in which participants found and repeated sequences of commands to achieve the shift task was observed. Four types of button layouts were prepared: normal, random, name appears after the first success (NAFS), and change to normal controller after the first success (CNFS). The normal layout roughly matched the position of the robot’s joints, whereas the random layout was randomly assigned, and no information was displayed on each button. Before completing the shift task, a random layout was provided in the NAFS and CNFS layouts. After the first success, the corresponding joint information was displayed in the NAFS layout, whereas the layout was changed to a normal one in the CNFS layout. In total, 51 participants used the normal layout, 7 participants used the random layout, 25 participants used the NAFS layout, and 24 participants used the CNFS layout. The results indicate that providing a random layout during the exploration process (before the first success) is preferable for effective exploration and learning. However, during the learning process (after the first success), providing the relationship between joint movements and buttons in a visual manner is better without changing the button layout from that used in the exploration process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuyou Watanabe
- Faculty of Frontier Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ichikawa, Japan
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Burghgraef TA, Sikkenk DJ, Verheijen PM, Moumni ME, Hompes R, Consten ECJ. The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:6337-6360. [PMID: 35697853 PMCID: PMC9402498 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09087-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard treatment of rectal carcinoma is surgical resection according to the total mesorectal excision principle, either by open, laparoscopic, robot-assisted or transanal technique. No clear consensus exists regarding the length of the learning curve for the minimal invasive techniques. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current literature regarding the learning curve of minimal invasive TME. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for studies with the primary or secondary aim to assess the learning curve of either laparoscopic, robot-assisted or transanal TME for rectal cancer. The primary outcome was length of the learning curve per minimal invasive technique. Descriptive statistics were used to present results and the MINORS tool was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS 45 studies, with 7562 patients, were included in this systematic review. Length of the learning curve based on intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, pathological outcomes, or a composite endpoint using a risk-adjusted CUSUM analysis was 50 procedures for the laparoscopic technique, 32-75 procedures for the robot-assisted technique and 36-54 procedures for the transanal technique. Due to the low quality of studies and a high level of heterogeneity a meta-analysis could not be performed. Heterogeneity was caused by patient-related factors, surgeon-related factors and differences in statistical methods. CONCLUSION Current high-quality literature regarding length of the learning curve of minimal invasive TME techniques is scarce. Available literature suggests equal lengths of the learning curves of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal TME. Well-designed studies, using adequate statistical methods are required to properly assess the learning curve, while taking into account patient-related and surgeon-related factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs A Burghgraef
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Daan J Sikkenk
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Paul M Verheijen
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Mostafa El Moumni
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Amsterdam, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Zhang Y, Feng H, Wang S, Gu Y, Shi Y, Song Z, Deng Y, Ji X, Cheng X, Zhang T, Zhao R. Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy: A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2022; 105:106855. [PMID: 36030038 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to retrospectively compare the short- and long-term outcomes of robotic- and laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent right hemicolectomy with either robotic (46 patients) or laparoscopic (186 patients) surgery between January 2016 and December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively using propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS After matching, the robotic group included 45 patients (out of 46) and the laparoscopic group included 100 patients (out of 186). Compared to the laparoscopic group, the robotic group had shorter median times to first flatus (2 vs. 4 days; p < 0.01) and a liquid diet (4 vs. 5 days; p < 0.01) and shorter median postoperative hospital stays (7 vs. 8 days; p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in other short-term or oncological outcomes between the two groups. The 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS Robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy had the advantages of a quick recovery of bowel functions and an earlier postoperative discharge and was non-inferior to laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy in all other outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaqi Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Haoran Feng
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shaodong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yifei Gu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, China
| | - Yi Shi
- Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China
| | - Zijia Song
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang Deng
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaopin Ji
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi Cheng
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Ren Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Using a modified Delphi process to explore international surgeon-reported benefits of robotic-assisted surgery to perform abdominal rectopexy. Tech Coloproctol 2022; 26:953-962. [DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02679-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
50
|
Condino S, Piazza R, Carbone M, Bath J, Troisi N, Ferrari M, Berchiolli R. Bioengineering, augmented reality, and robotic surgery in vascular surgery: A literature review. Front Surg 2022; 9:966118. [PMID: 36061062 PMCID: PMC9437582 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.966118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Biomedical engineering integrates a variety of applied sciences with life sciences to improve human health and reduce the invasiveness of surgical procedures. Technological advances, achieved through biomedical engineering, have contributed to significant improvements in the field of vascular and endovascular surgery. This paper aims to review the most cutting-edge technologies of the last decade involving the use of augmented reality devices and robotic systems in vascular surgery, highlighting benefits and limitations. Accordingly, two distinct literature surveys were conducted through the PubMed database: the first review provides a comprehensive assessment of augmented reality technologies, including the different techniques available for the visualization of virtual content (11 papers revised); the second review collects studies with bioengineering content that highlight the research trend in robotic vascular surgery, excluding works focused only on the clinical use of commercially available robotic systems (15 papers revised). Technological flow is constant and further advances in imaging techniques and hardware components will inevitably bring new tools for a clinical translation of innovative therapeutic strategies in vascular surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Condino
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- EndoCAS Center, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberta Piazza
- EndoCAS Center, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marina Carbone
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- EndoCAS Center, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Correspondence: Marina Carbone
| | - Jonathan Bath
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - Nicola Troisi
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Mauro Ferrari
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Raffaella Berchiolli
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|