1
|
Oliva A, Liguori L, Covino S, Petrucci F, Cogliati-Dezza F, Curtolo A, Savelloni G, Comi M, Sacco F, Ceccarelli G, Viscido A, Alessandri F, Raponi G, Pugliese F, Mastroianni CM, Venditti M. Clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol for the treatment of bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii during the COVID-19 era: a single center, observational study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2024:10.1007/s10096-024-04833-8. [PMID: 38634975 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-024-04833-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed the clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol (CFDC) in comparison with colistin (COL) for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) bloodstream infections (BSI). MATERIALS/METHODS Retrospective cohort study including adults with CRAB-BSI. Outcomes were mortality, clinical cure and adverse events during therapy. The average treatment effect of CFDC compared to COL was weighted with the inverse-probability treatment weight (IPTW). RESULTS Overall, 104 patients were included (50 CFDC, 54 COL), median age 66.5 years, median Charlson Comorbidity Index 5, septic shock in 33.6% of patients. Primary BSI accounted for 43.3% of cases, followed by ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (26%), catheter-related BSI (20.2%) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) (9.6%). Although not significantly, mortality at all time points was lower for CFDC than COL, while clinical cure was higher in CFDC than COL (66% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.027). Adverse events were more frequent in COL than CFDC-group (38.8% vs. 10%, p < 0.0001), primarily attributed to acute kidney injury (AKI) in the COL group. Patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP treated with CFDC had a significant lower 30-d mortality and higher clinical cure than COL (p = 0.008 and p = 0.0008, respectively). Increment of CCI (p = 0.005), ICU (p = 0.025), SARS-CoV2 (p = 0.006) and ECMO (p < 0.0001) were independently associated with 30-d mortality, while receiving CFDC was not associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS CFDC could represent an effective and safe treatment option for CRAB BSI, especially in patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP and frail patients where the risk of acute renal failure during therapy should be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Oliva
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, 00185, Italy.
| | - L Liguori
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, 00185, Italy
| | - S Covino
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, 00185, Italy
| | - F Petrucci
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, 00185, Italy
| | - F Cogliati-Dezza
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, 00185, Italy
| | - A Curtolo
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, 00185, Italy
| | - G Savelloni
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, 00185, Italy
| | - M Comi
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, 00185, Italy
| | - F Sacco
- Microbiology and Virology Laboratory, Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - G Ceccarelli
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, 00185, Italy
| | - A Viscido
- Microbiology and Virology Laboratory, Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - F Alessandri
- Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - G Raponi
- Microbiology and Virology Laboratory, Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - F Pugliese
- Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - C M Mastroianni
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, 00185, Italy
| | - M Venditti
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, 00185, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rocca A, Avella P, Scacchi A, Brunese MC, Cappuccio M, De Rosa M, Bartoli A, Guerra G, Calise F, Ceccarelli G. Robotic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases in a "referral centre Hub&Spoke learning program". A multicenter propensity score matching analysis of perioperative outcomes. Heliyon 2024; 10:e24800. [PMID: 38322841 PMCID: PMC10844024 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Surgical resection is still considered the optimal treatment for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Although laparoscopic and robotic surgery demonstrated their reliability especially in referral centers, the comparison between perioperative outcomes of robotic liver resection (RLR) and open (OLR) liver resection are still debated when performed in referral centers for robotic surgery, not dedicated to HPB. Our study aimed to verify the efficacy and safety of perioperative outcomes after RLR and OLR for CRLM in an HUB&Spoke learning program (H&S) between a high volume center for liver surgery and high volume center for robotic surgery. Methods We analyzed prospective databases of Pineta Grande Hospital (Castel Volturno) and Robotic Surgical Units (Foligno-Spoleto and Arezzo) from 2011 to 2021. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed according to baseline characteristics of patients, solitary/multiple CRLM, anterolateral/posterosuperior location. Results 383 patients accepted to be part of the study (268 ORL and 115 RLR). After PSM, 45 patients from each group were included. Conversion rate was 8.89 %. RLR group had a significantly lower blood loss (226 vs. 321 ml; p=0.0001), and fewer major complications (13.33 % vs. 17.78 %; p=0.7722). R0 resection was obtained in 100% of OLR (vs.95.55%, p =0.4944. Hospital stay was 8.8 days in RLR (vs. 15; p=0.0001).Conclusion: H&S represents a safe and effective program to train general surgeons also in Hepatobiliary surgery providing R0 resection rate, blood loss volume and morbidity rate superimposable to referral centers. Furthermore, H&S allow a reduction of health mobility with consequent money saving for patients and institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Rocca
- Department of Medicine and Health Science “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy
| | - Pasquale Avella
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Scacchi
- General Surgery Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Science “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Micaela Cappuccio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele De Rosa
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy
| | - Alberto Bartoli
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy
| | - Germano Guerra
- Department of Medicine and Health Science “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Fulvio Calise
- Department of Medicine and Health Science “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de'Angelis N, Schena CA, Marchegiani F, Reitano E, De Simone B, Wong GYM, Martínez-Pérez A, Abu-Zidan FM, Agnoletti V, Aisoni F, Ammendola M, Ansaloni L, Bala M, Biffl W, Ceccarelli G, Ceresoli M, Chiara O, Chiarugi M, Cimbanassi S, Coccolini F, Coimbra R, Di Saverio S, Diana M, Dioguardi Burgio M, Fraga G, Gavriilidis P, Gurrado A, Inchingolo R, Ingels A, Ivatury R, Kashuk JL, Khan J, Kirkpatrick AW, Kim FJ, Kluger Y, Lakkis Z, Leppäniemi A, Maier RV, Memeo R, Moore EE, Ordoñez CA, Peitzman AB, Pellino G, Picetti E, Pikoulis M, Pisano M, Podda M, Romeo O, Rosa F, Tan E, Ten Broek RP, Testini M, Tian Wei Cheng BA, Weber D, Sacco E, Sartelli M, Tonsi A, Dal Moro F, Catena F. 2023 WSES guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of iatrogenic urinary tract injuries (IUTIs) during emergency digestive surgery. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:45. [PMID: 37689688 PMCID: PMC10492308 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00513-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Iatrogenic urinary tract injury (IUTI) is a severe complication of emergency digestive surgery. It can lead to increased postoperative morbidity and mortality and have a long-term impact on the quality of life. The reported incidence of IUTIs varies greatly among the studies, ranging from 0.3 to 1.5%. Given the high volume of emergency digestive surgery performed worldwide, there is a need for well-defined and effective strategies to prevent and manage IUTIs. Currently, there is a lack of consensus regarding the prevention, detection, and management of IUTIs in the emergency setting. The present guidelines, promoted by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), were developed following a systematic review of the literature and an international expert panel discussion. The primary aim of these WSES guidelines is to provide evidence-based recommendations to support clinicians and surgeons in the prevention, detection, and management of IUTIs during emergency digestive surgery. The following key aspects were considered: (1) effectiveness of preventive interventions for IUTIs during emergency digestive surgery; (2) intra-operative detection of IUTIs and appropriate management strategies; (3) postoperative detection of IUTIs and appropriate management strategies and timing; and (4) effectiveness of antibiotic therapy (including type and duration) in case of IUTIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola de'Angelis
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, Clichy, Paris, France
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Carlo Alberto Schena
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, Clichy, Paris, France.
| | - Francesco Marchegiani
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, Clichy, Paris, France
| | - Elisa Reitano
- Department of General Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, CHRU-Strasbourg, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Guastalla Hospital, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio, Emilia, Italy
| | - Geoffrey Yuet Mun Wong
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Aleix Martínez-Pérez
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - Fikri M Abu-Zidan
- The Research Office, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, UAE
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| | - Filippo Aisoni
- Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Università Degli Studi Di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Michele Ammendola
- Science of Health Department, Digestive Surgery Unit, University "Magna Graecia" Medical School, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Miklosh Bala
- Acute Care Surgery and Trauma Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Kiriat Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Walter Biffl
- Division of Trauma/Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Italy
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- General and Emergency Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Monza, Italy
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Niguarda Milano, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- General, Emergency and Trauma Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Stefania Cimbanassi
- General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Niguarda Milano, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Unit of General Surgery, San Benedetto del Tronto Hospital, av5 Asur Marche, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Michele Diana
- Department of General Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, CHRU-Strasbourg, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Gustavo Fraga
- Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Paschalis Gavriilidis
- Department of HBP Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK
| | - Angela Gurrado
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery "V. Bonomo", University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Riccardo Inchingolo
- Unit of Interventional Radiology, F. Miulli Hospital, 70021, Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Alexandre Ingels
- Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), 94000, Créteil, France
| | - Rao Ivatury
- Professor Emeritus, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Jeffry L Kashuk
- Department of Surgery, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jim Khan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University of Portsmouth, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, EG23T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Fernando J Kim
- Division of Urology, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Zaher Lakkis
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology - Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ronald V Maier
- Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Ernest E Moore
- Ernest E. Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Carlos A Ordoñez
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia
- Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia
| | - Andrew B Peitzman
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC-Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Manos Pikoulis
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Michele Pisano
- 1st General Surgery Unit, Department of Emergency, ASST Papa Giovanni Hospital Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Fausto Rosa
- Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Edward Tan
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mario Testini
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery "V. Bonomo", University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | | | - Dieter Weber
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Emilio Sacco
- Department of Urology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Di Roma, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Alfredo Tonsi
- Digestive Diseases Department, Royal Sussex County Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Giuliani G, Guerra F, Messinese S, Santelli F, Salvischiani L, Esposito S, Ferraro L, Esposito A, De Pastena M, Rega D, Delrio P, La Raja C, Spinelli A, Massaron S, De Nardi P, Kauffmann EF, Boggi U, Deidda S, Restivo A, Marano A, Borghi F, Piccoli M, Depalma N, D'Ugo S, Spampinato M, Cozzani F, Del Rio P, Marcellinaro R, Carlini M, De Rosa R, Scabini S, Maiello F, Polastri R, Turri G, Pedrazzani C, Zese M, Parini D, Casaril A, Moretto G, De Leo A, Catarci M, Trapani R, Zonta S, Marsanic P, Muratore A, Di Franco G, Morelli L, Coppola A, Caputo D, Andreuccetti J, Pignata G, Mastrangelo L, Jovine E, Mazzola M, Ferrari G, Mariani L, Ceccarelli G, Giuseppe R, Bolzon S, Grasso M, Testa S, Germani P, de Manzini N, Langella S, Ferrero A, Coletta D, Bianchi PP, Bengala C, Coratti A. The COVID - AGICT study: COVID-19 and advanced gastro-intestinal cancer surgical treatment. A multicentric Italian study on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic impact on gastro-intestinal cancers surgical treatment during the 2020. Analysis of perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes. Surg Oncol 2023; 47:101907. [PMID: 36924550 PMCID: PMC9892255 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.101907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This Italian multicentric retrospective study aimed to investigate the possible changes in outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD Our primary endpoint was to determine whether the pandemic scenario increased the rate of patients with colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers resected at an advanced stage in 2020 compared to 2019. Considering different cancer staging systems, we divided tumors into early stages and advanced stages, using pathological outcomes. Furthermore, to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical outcomes, perioperative data of both 2020 and 2019 were also examined. RESULTS Overall, a total of 8250 patients, 4370 (53%) and 3880 (47%) were surgically treated during 2019 and 2020 respectively, in 62 Italian surgical Units. In 2020, the rate of patients treated with an advanced pathological stage was not different compared to 2019 (P = 0.25). Nevertheless, the analysis of quarters revealed that in the second half of 2020 the rate of advanced cancer resected, tented to be higher compared with the same months of 2019 (P = 0.05). During the pandemic year 'Charlson Comorbidity Index score of cancer patients (5.38 ± 2.08 vs 5.28 ± 2.22, P = 0.036), neoadjuvant treatments (23.9% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.001), rate of urgent diagnosis (24.2% vs 20.3%, P < 0.001), colorectal cancer urgent resection (9.4% vs. 7.37, P < 0.001), and the rate of positive nodes on the total nodes resected per surgery increased significantly (7 vs 9% - 2.02 ± 4.21 vs 2.39 ± 5.23, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Although the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic did not influence the pathological stage of colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers at the time of surgery, our study revealed that the pandemic scenario negatively impacted on several perioperative and post-operative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Giuliani
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Usl Toscana Sud Est. School of Robotic Surgery, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Francesco Guerra
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Usl Toscana Sud Est. School of Robotic Surgery, Grosseto, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Santelli
- Department of Economics, Business, Mathematics and Statistics (DEAMS), University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Lucia Salvischiani
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Usl Toscana Sud Est. School of Robotic Surgery, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Sofia Esposito
- Department of General, Emergency Surgery and New Technologies, Baggiovara General Hospital, AOU Modena, Italy
| | - Luca Ferraro
- Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo De Pastena
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Daniela Rega
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Carlotta La Raja
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Simonetta Massaron
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola De Nardi
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Simona Deidda
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Center, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Angelo Restivo
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Center, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessandra Marano
- General and Specialist Surgery Department, Emergency General Surgery Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Felice Borghi
- Oncological Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060, Torino, Italy
| | - Micaela Piccoli
- Department of General, Emergency Surgery and New Technologies, Baggiovara General Hospital, AOU Modena, Italy
| | - Norma Depalma
- Department of General Surgery, "Vito Fazzi" Hospital, Piazza Muratore, 1-73100, Lecce, Italy
| | - Stefano D'Ugo
- Department of General Surgery, "Vito Fazzi" Hospital, Piazza Muratore, 1-73100, Lecce, Italy
| | - Marcello Spampinato
- Department of General Surgery, "Vito Fazzi" Hospital, Piazza Muratore, 1-73100, Lecce, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Del Rio
- General Surgery Unit, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Rosa Marcellinaro
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, Piazzale dell'Umanesimo, 10, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Carlini
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, Piazzale dell'Umanesimo, 10, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Raffaele De Rosa
- Surgical Oncology Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefano Scabini
- Surgical Oncology Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Fabio Maiello
- Department of Surgery - General Surgery Unit, Hospital of Biella, Biella, Italy
| | - Roberto Polastri
- Department of Surgery - General Surgery Unit, Hospital of Biella, Biella, Italy
| | - Giulia Turri
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Unit of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Corrado Pedrazzani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Unit of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Monica Zese
- Department of General and Urgent Surgery, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Dario Parini
- Department of General and Urgent Surgery, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Andrea Casaril
- Department of Surgery, "Pederzoli" Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Moretto
- Department of Surgery, "Pederzoli" Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio De Leo
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Via dei Monti Tiburtini, 385, 00157, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Via dei Monti Tiburtini, 385, 00157, Rome, Italy
| | - Renza Trapani
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale San Biagio, ASL VCO, Domodossola, Italy
| | - Sandro Zonta
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale San Biagio, ASL VCO, Domodossola, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Muratore
- Surgical Department, E. Agnelli Hospital, 10064, Pinerolo, Italy
| | - Gregorio Di Franco
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy
| | - Luca Morelli
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Damiano Caputo
- Research Unit of Generale Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy; Operative Research Unit of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200 - 00128, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Giusto Pignata
- Second General Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Laura Mastrangelo
- Division of General and Emergency Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Division of General and Emergency Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michele Mazzola
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Mariani
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Italy
| | - Rocco Giuseppe
- Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Area Vasta Romagna, Santa Maria delle Croci - Ravenna Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Stefano Bolzon
- Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Area Vasta Romagna, Santa Maria delle Croci - Ravenna Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | | | - Silvio Testa
- S.C. Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale S.Andrea, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Paola Germani
- Surgical Clinic Unit, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Nicolò de Manzini
- Surgical Clinic Unit, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Serena Langella
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Diego Coletta
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Pietro Bianchi
- Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milano, Italy
| | - Carmelo Bengala
- Medical Oncology Unit, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Usl Toscana Sud Est. School of Robotic Surgery, Grosseto, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
de’Angelis N, Marchegiani F, Schena CA, Khan J, Agnoletti V, Ansaloni L, Barría Rodríguez AG, Bianchi PP, Biffl W, Bravi F, Ceccarelli G, Ceresoli M, Chiara O, Chirica M, Cobianchi L, Coccolini F, Coimbra R, Cotsoglou C, D’Hondt M, Damaskos D, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Diana M, Espin‐Basany E, Fichtner‐Feigl S, Fugazzola P, Gavriilidis P, Gronnier C, Kashuk J, Kirkpatrick AW, Ammendola M, Kouwenhoven EA, Laurent A, Leppaniemi A, Lesurtel M, Memeo R, Milone M, Moore E, Pararas N, Peitzmann A, Pessaux P, Picetti E, Pikoulis M, Pisano M, Ris F, Robison T, Sartelli M, Shelat VG, Spinoglio G, Sugrue M, Tan E, Van Eetvelde E, Kluger Y, Weber D, Catena F. Training curriculum in minimally invasive emergency digestive surgery: 2022 WSES position paper. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:11. [PMID: 36707879 PMCID: PMC9883976 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00476-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including laparoscopic and robotic approaches, is widely adopted in elective digestive surgery, but selectively used for surgical emergencies. The present position paper summarizes the available evidence concerning the learning curve to achieve proficiency in emergency MIS and provides five expert opinion statements, which may form the basis for developing standardized curricula and training programs in emergency MIS. METHODS This position paper was conducted according to the World Society of Emergency Surgery methodology. A steering committee and an international expert panel were involved in the critical appraisal of the literature and the development of the consensus statements. RESULTS Thirteen studies regarding the learning curve in emergency MIS were selected. All but one study considered laparoscopic appendectomy. Only one study reported on emergency robotic surgery. In most of the studies, proficiency was achieved after an average of 30 procedures (range: 20-107) depending on the initial surgeon's experience. High heterogeneity was noted in the way the learning curve was assessed. The experts claim that further studies investigating learning curve processes in emergency MIS are needed. The emergency surgeon curriculum should include a progressive and adequate training based on simulation, supervised clinical practice (proctoring), and surgical fellowships. The results should be evaluated by adopting a credentialing system to ensure quality standards. Surgical proficiency should be maintained with a minimum caseload and constantly evaluated. Moreover, the training process should involve the entire surgical team to facilitate the surgeon's proficiency. CONCLUSIONS Limited evidence exists concerning the learning process in laparoscopic and robotic emergency surgery. The proposed statements should be seen as a preliminary guide for the surgical community while stressing the need for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola de’Angelis
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, Paris, France ,grid.410511.00000 0001 2149 7878Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Francesco Marchegiani
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, Paris, France
| | - Carlo Alberto Schena
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, Paris, France
| | - Jim Khan
- grid.4701.20000 0001 0728 6636Department of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University of Portsmouth, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- grid.414682.d0000 0004 1758 8744Intensive Care Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- grid.419425.f0000 0004 1760 3027Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Pietro Bianchi
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Walter Biffl
- grid.415402.60000 0004 0449 3295Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Francesca Bravi
- grid.415207.50000 0004 1760 3756Healthcare Administration, Santa Maria Delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Italy
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- grid.7563.70000 0001 2174 1754General and Emergency Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Monza, Italy
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Niguarda Milano, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mircea Chirica
- grid.450307.50000 0001 0944 2786Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Michallon Hospital, Grenoble University, Grenoble, France
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- grid.419425.f0000 0004 1760 3027Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy ,grid.8982.b0000 0004 1762 5736Department of Clinical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- grid.144189.10000 0004 1756 8209General, Emergency and Trauma Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Raul Coimbra
- grid.488519.90000 0004 5946 0028Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Riverside, CA USA
| | | | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Dimitris Damaskos
- grid.418716.d0000 0001 0709 1919Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of General and Metabolic Surgery, Poissy and Saint‐Germain‐en‐Laye Hospitals, Poissy, France
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Unit of General Surgery, San Benedetto del Tronto Hospital, av5 Asur Marche, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Michele Diana
- grid.11843.3f0000 0001 2157 9291Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ,grid.420397.b0000 0000 9635 7370IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, Strasbourg, France
| | - Eloy Espin‐Basany
- grid.7080.f0000 0001 2296 0625Department of General Surgery, Hospital Valle de Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefan Fichtner‐Feigl
- grid.7708.80000 0000 9428 7911Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- grid.419425.f0000 0004 1760 3027Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Paschalis Gavriilidis
- grid.15628.380000 0004 0393 1193Department of HBP Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX UK
| | - Caroline Gronnier
- grid.42399.350000 0004 0593 7118Eso-Gastric Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Magellan Center, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Jeffry Kashuk
- grid.12136.370000 0004 1937 0546Department of Surgery, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Andrew W. Kirkpatrick
- grid.414959.40000 0004 0469 2139Department of General, Acute Care, Abdominal Wall Reconstruction, and Trauma Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Michele Ammendola
- grid.411489.10000 0001 2168 2547Digestive Surgery Unit, Health of Science Department, “Magna Graecia” University Medical School, “Mater Domini” Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Ewout A. Kouwenhoven
- grid.417370.60000 0004 0502 0983Department of Surgery, Hospital Group Twente ZGT, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - Alexis Laurent
- grid.410511.00000 0001 2149 7878Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France ,grid.412116.10000 0004 1799 3934Unit of HPB and Service of General Surgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Ari Leppaniemi
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- grid.415844.80000 0004 1759 7181Unit of Hepato‐Pancreato‐Biliary Surgery, General Regional Hospital “F. Miulli”, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- grid.4691.a0000 0001 0790 385XDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II” University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Ernest Moore
- grid.241116.10000000107903411Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO USA
| | - Nikolaos Pararas
- grid.5216.00000 0001 2155 08003Rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Andrew Peitzmann
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- grid.11843.3f0000 0001 2157 9291Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ,grid.480511.9Institute for Image‐Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ,Institute of Viral and Liver Disease, INSERM U1110, Strasbourg, France
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- grid.411482.aDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Manos Pikoulis
- grid.5216.00000 0001 2155 08003Rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Michele Pisano
- 1St General Surgery Unit, Department of Emergency, ASST Papa Giovanni Hospital Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Frederic Ris
- grid.150338.c0000 0001 0721 9812Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Tyler Robison
- grid.5288.70000 0000 9758 5690Minimally Invasive Surgery Fellow, Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR USA
| | | | - Vishal G. Shelat
- grid.240988.f0000 0001 0298 8161Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Giuseppe Spinoglio
- grid.420397.b0000 0000 9635 7370IRCAD Faculty Member Robotic and Colorectal Surgery‐ IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
| | - Michael Sugrue
- grid.415900.90000 0004 0617 6488Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Edward Tan
- grid.10417.330000 0004 0444 9382Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Ellen Van Eetvelde
- grid.411326.30000 0004 0626 3362Department of Digestive Surgery, UZ, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Rambam Healthcare Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Dieter Weber
- grid.416195.e0000 0004 0453 3875Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Fausto Catena
- grid.414682.d0000 0004 1758 8744Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital‐Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Milone M, Elmore U, Manigrasso M, Ortenzi M, Botteri E, Arezzo A, Silecchia G, Guerrieri M, De Palma GD, Agresta F, Agresta F, Pizza F, D’Antonio D, Amalfitano F, Selvaggi F, Sciaudone G, Selvaggi L, Prando D, Cavallo F, Guerrieri M, Ortenzi M, Lezoche G, Cuccurullo D, Tartaglia E, Sagnelli C, Coratti A, Tribuzi A, Di Marino M, Anania G, Bombardini C, Zago MP, Tagliabue F, Burati M, Di Saverio S, Colombo S, Adla SE, De Luca M, Zese M, Parini D, Prosperi P, Alemanno G, Martellucci J, Olmi S, Oldani A, Uccelli M, Bono D, Scaglione D, Saracco R, Podda M, Pisanu A, Murzi V, Agrusa A, Buscemi S, Muttillo IA, Picardi B, Muttillo EM, Solaini L, Cavaliere D, Ercolani G, Corcione F, Peltrini R, Bracale U, Lucchi A, Vittori L, Grassia M, Porcu A, Perra T, Feo C, Angelini P, Izzo D, Ricciardelli L, Trompetto M, Gallo G, Luc AR, Muratore A, Calabrò M, Cuzzola B, Barberis A, Costanzo F, Angelini G, Ceccarelli G, Rondelli F, De Rosa M, Cassinotti E, Boni L, Baldari L, Bianchi PP, Formisano G, Giuliani G, Ceretti AAP, Mariani NM, Giovenzana M, Farfaglia R, Marcianò P, Arizzi V, Piccoli M, Pecchini F, Pattacini GC, Botteri E, Vettoretto N, Guarnieri C, Laface L, Abate E, Casati M, Feo C, Fabri N, Pesce A, Maida P, Marte G, Abete R, Casali L, Marchignoli A, Dall’Aglio M, Scabini S, Pertile D, Aprile A, Andreuccetti J, Di Leo A, Crepaz L, Maione F, Vertaldi S, Chini A, Rosati R, Puccetti F, Maggi G, Cossu A, Sartori A, De Luca M, Piatto G, Perrotta N, Celiento M, Scorzelli M, Pilone V, Tramontano S, Calabrese P, Sechi R, Cillara N, Putzu G, Podda MG, Montuori M, Pinotti E, Sica G, Franceschilli M, Sensi B, Degiuli M, Reddavid R, Puca L, Farsi M, Minuzzo A, Gia E, Baiocchi GL, Ranieri V, Celotti A, Bianco F, Grassia S, Novi A. ERas and COLorectal endoscopic surgery: an Italian society for endoscopic surgery and new technologies (SICE) national report. Surg Endosc 2022. [DOI: https:/doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09212-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Several reports demonstrated a strong association between the level of adherence to the protocol and improved clinical outcomes after surgery. However, it is difficult to obtain full adherence to the protocol into clinical practice and has still not been identified the threshold beyond which improved functional results can be reached.
Methods
The ERCOLE (ERas and COLorectal Endoscopic surgery) study was as a cohort, prospective, multi-centre national study evaluating the association between adherence to ERAS items and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. The primary endpoint was to associate the percentage of ERAS adherence to functional recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery. The secondary endpoints of the study was to validate safety of the ERAS programme evaluating complications’ occurrence according to Clavien-Dindo classification and to evaluate the compliance of the Italian surgeons to each ERAS item.
Results
1138 patients were included. Adherence to the ERAS protocol was full only in 101 patients (8.9%), > 75% of the ERAS items in 736 (64.7%) and > 50% in 1127 (99%). Adherence to > 75% was associated with a better functional recovery with 90.2 ± 98.8 vs 95.9 ± 33.4 h (p = 0.003). At difference, full adherence to the ERAS components 91.7 ± 22.1 vs 92.2 ± 31.6 h (p = 0.8) was not associated with better recovery.
Conclusions
Our results were encouraging to affirm that adherence to the ERAS program up to 75% could be considered satisfactory to get the goal. Our study could be considered a call to simplify the ERAS protocol facilitating its penetrance into clinical practice.
Collapse
|
7
|
Luciani C, Scacchi A, Vaschetti R, Di Marzo G, Fatica I, Cappuccio M, Guerra G, Ceccarelli G, Avella P, Rocca A. The uniportal VATS in the treatment of stage II pleural empyema: a safe and effective approach for adults and elderly patients-a single-center experience and literature review. World J Emerg Surg 2022; 17:46. [PMID: 36038946 PMCID: PMC9423701 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00438-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pleural empyema (PE) is a frequent disease, associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Surgical approach is the standard of care for most patients with II-III stage PE. In the last years, the minimally invasive surgical revolution involved also thoracic surgery allowing the same outcomes in terms of safety and effectiveness combined to better pain management and early discharge. The aim of this study is to demonstrate through our experience on uniportal-video-assisted thoracoscopy (u-VATS) the effectiveness and safety of its approach in treatment of stage II PE. As secondary endpoint, we will evaluate the different pattern of indication of u-VATS in adult and elderly patients with literature review. Methods We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected database of u-VATS procedures from November 2018 to February 2022, in our regional referral center for Thoracic Surgery of Regione Molise General Surgery Unit of “A. Cardarelli” Hospital, in Campobasso, Molise, Italy. Results A total of 29 patients underwent u-VATS for II stage PE. Fifteen (51.72%) patients were younger than 70 years old, identified as “adults,” 14 (48.28%) patients were older than 70 years old, identified as “elderly.” No mortality was found. Mean operative time was 104.68 ± 39.01 min in the total population. The elderly group showed a longer operative time (115 ± 53.15 min) (p = 0.369). Chest tube was removed earlier in adults than in elderly group (5.56 ± 2.06 vs. 10.14 ± 5.58 p = 0.038). The Length of Stay (LOS) was shorter in the adults group (6.44 ± 2.35 vs. 12.29 ± 6.96 p = 0.033). Patients evaluated through Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale returned to normal activities of daily living after surgery. Conclusion In addition, the u-VATS approach seems to be safe and effective ensuring a risk reduction of progression to stage III PE with a lower recurrence risk and septic complications also in elderly patients. Further comparative multicenter analysis are advocated to set the role of u-VATS approach in the treatment of PE in adults and elderly patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-022-00438-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Luciani
- General Surgery Unit, A. Cardarelli Hospital, Campobasso, CB, Italy
| | - Andrea Scacchi
- Department of Medicine and Health Science, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Roberto Vaschetti
- Department of Medicine and Health Science, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | | | - Ilaria Fatica
- Department of Medicine and Health Science, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Micaela Cappuccio
- Department of Medicine and Health Science, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Germano Guerra
- Department of Medicine and Health Science, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Pasquale Avella
- Department of Medicine and Health Science, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Aldo Rocca
- Department of Medicine and Health Science, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
De Rosa M, Ceccarelli G. Bipartite liver: an incidental rare anomaly of the liver. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2022; 11:649-650. [PMID: 36016733 PMCID: PMC9396098 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-22-128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
9
|
Ceccarelli G, Codacci-Pisanelli M, De Rosa M, Mariani L, Rocca A, Mazzucca D, Polistena A. Robot-Assisted Liver Resection and Cholecystectomy Using Indocyanine-Green for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, in a Very Rare Anatomical Anomaly of ‘Bipartite Liver’. Surg Innov 2022; 29:488-493. [DOI: 10.1177/15533506221081116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
Robotic hepatobiliary surgery has significantly developed worldwide with substantial clinical results. Hepatobiliary anatomical anomalies increase the complexity of hepatobiliary resection with a relevant risk of iatrogenic lesions. Among congenital liver anomalies, the ‘bipartite liver’ is an extremely rare condition which might be associated with complex surgical dissection of the hepatic hilum. We herein report a rare case of congenital ‘bipartite liver’ associated with a cholangiocarcinoma of segment VI and calculous cholecystitis. The patient underwent robot-assisted segmentectomy and cholecystectomy with the use of indocyanine-green cholangiography and intraoperative ultrasound. A challenging hilar dissection was performed using this approach. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reported that describes a robot-assisted liver resection and cholecystectomy in a patient having a cholangiocarcinoma associated with this rare liver anomaly. The robotic approach was safe and effective and the 3D preoperative imaging, as well as the intraoperative green-indocyanine cholangiography was extremely useful, especially during hilar dissection and cholecystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Massimo Codacci-Pisanelli
- General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of Surgery Pietro Valdoni, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Aldo Rocca
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Polistena
- General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of Surgery Pietro Valdoni, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nunnari P, Ladiana N, Ceccarelli G, Notaro P. Long-term Cannabis-based oil therapy and pain medications prescribing patterns: an Italian observational study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2022; 26:1224-1234. [PMID: 35253178 DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202202_28114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Chronic pain is one of the most common medical conditions in developed countries. The 2020 Italian National Report on Medicines shows how, in the last years, there was a light but constant increase in the prescription of pain medications. The purpose of our study was to assess the effects of long-term cannabis-based oil consumption on the distribution of patients with analgesics prescriptions for chronic pain in a Pain Medicine Unit in Northern Italy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a retrospective, observational study in which patients treated with long-term medical cannabis-based oils, followed between June 2016 and July 2019, were enrolled. The effects of cannabis-based oil consumption on the distribution of patients with pain medications, before and after its long-term use, were evaluated with a Related Samples McNemar Test. Subgroups analyses were performed based on sex, age, comorbidity, duration of cannabis treatment, and condition driving cannabis prescription. RESULTS A significant difference in opioid non-users after a long-term cannabis-based oil therapy was identified (from 32.1% to 55.4%, p = 0.0023), while no significant differences were found in the distribution of anticonvulsant, antidepressant, and benzodiazepine users. A high benzodiazepine use prevalence was revealed, while subgroup analyses showed increased antidepressant use in people over 65 years old (from 93.7% to 56.2%; p = 0.0313). CONCLUSIONS Pain medication patterns of prescribing show how necessary it is to improve prescription practices among chronic pain patients. Opioid-sparing medications represent a crucial aspect of the pain treatment process, along with deprescribing protocols. Clinicians and clinical pharmacologists must cooperate to meet the need of a guide that can represent the most possible appropriate therapy for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Nunnari
- Pain Medicine Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
de’Angelis N, Khan J, Marchegiani F, Bianchi G, Aisoni F, Alberti D, Ansaloni L, Biffl W, Chiara O, Ceccarelli G, Coccolini F, Cicuttin E, D’Hondt M, Di Saverio S, Diana M, De Simone B, Espin-Basany E, Fichtner-Feigl S, Kashuk J, Kouwenhoven E, Leppaniemi A, Beghdadi N, Memeo R, Milone M, Moore E, Peitzmann A, Pessaux P, Pikoulis M, Pisano M, Ris F, Sartelli M, Spinoglio G, Sugrue M, Tan E, Gavriilidis P, Weber D, Kluger Y, Catena F. Robotic surgery in emergency setting: 2021 WSES position paper. World J Emerg Surg 2022; 17:4. [PMID: 35057836 PMCID: PMC8781145 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00410-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Robotics represents the most technologically advanced approach in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Its application in general surgery has increased progressively, with some early experience reported in emergency settings. The present position paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a systematic review of the literature to develop consensus statements about the potential use of robotics in emergency general surgery.
Methods This position paper was conducted according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee was constituted to draft the position paper according to the literature review. An international expert panel then critically revised the manuscript. Each statement was voted through a web survey to reach a consensus.
Results Ten studies (3 case reports, 3 case series, and 4 retrospective comparative cohort studies) have been published regarding the applications of robotics for emergency general surgery procedures. Due to the paucity and overall low quality of evidence, 6 statements are proposed as expert opinions. In general, the experts claim for a strict patient selection while approaching emergent general surgery procedures with robotics, eventually considering it for hemodynamically stable patients only. An emergency setting should not be seen as an absolute contraindication for robotic surgery if an adequate training of the operating surgical team is available. In such conditions, robotic surgery can be considered safe, feasible, and associated with surgical outcomes related to an MIS approach. However, there are some concerns regarding the adoption of robotic surgery for emergency surgeries associated with the following: (i) the availability and accessibility of the robotic platform for emergency units and during night shifts, (ii) expected longer operative times, and (iii) increased costs. Further research is necessary to investigate the role of robotic surgery in emergency settings and to explore the possibility of performing telementoring and telesurgery, which are particularly valuable in emergency situations. Conclusions Many hospitals are currently equipped with a robotic surgical platform which needs to be implemented efficiently. The role of robotic surgery for emergency procedures remains under investigation. However, its use is expanding with a careful assessment of costs and timeliness of operations. The proposed statements should be seen as a preliminary guide for the surgical community stressing the need for reevaluation and update processes as evidence expands in the relevant literature.
Collapse
|
12
|
Rocca A, Scacchi A, Cappuccio M, Avella P, Bugiantella W, De Rosa M, Costa G, Polistena A, Codacci-Pisanelli M, Amato B, Carbone F, Ceccarelli G. Robotic surgery for colorectal liver metastases resection: A systematic review. Int J Med Robot 2021; 17:e2330. [PMID: 34498805 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLMs) has never been investigated in large series. METHODS A systematic literature review was carried out on PubMed and Cochrane libraries. RESULTS We selected nine studies between 2008 and 2021. Two hundred sixty-two patients were included. One hundred thirty-one patients underwent simultaneous resections. The mean blood loss was 309.4 ml (range, 200-450 ml), the mean operative time was 250.5 min (range, 198.5-449.0 min). The mean length of hospital stay was 7.98 days (range, 4.5 to 12 days). The overall postoperative mortality was 0.4%. The overall morbidity rate was 37.0%, Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications were 8.4%. The mean 3-year overall survival was 55.25% (range, 44.4-66.1%), the mean 3-year disease free survival was 37% (range, 33.3-41.9%) CONCLUSION: We can conclude that robotic-assisted surgery might be considered as a technical upgrade option for minimally invasive approach to CRCLM resections even for simultaneous operations and challenging cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Rocca
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Andrea Scacchi
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Micaela Cappuccio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Pasquale Avella
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Walter Bugiantella
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista, Foligno, Italy
| | - Michele De Rosa
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista, Foligno, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costa
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, St Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Polistena
- UOC General Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of Surgery "P. Valdoni", Sapienza, University of Study of Rome, University Policlinic Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Codacci-Pisanelli
- UOC General Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of Surgery "P. Valdoni", Sapienza, University of Study of Rome, University Policlinic Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Amato
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Fabio Carbone
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Università di Napoli - "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista, Foligno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ceccarelli G, Costa G, De Rosa M, Codacci Pisanelli M, Frezza B, De Prizio M, Bravi I, Scacchi A, Gallo G, Amato B, Bugiantella W, Tacchi P, Bartoli A, Patriti A, Cappuccio M, Komici K, Mariani L, Avella P, Rocca A. Minimally Invasive Approach to Gastric GISTs: Analysis of a Multicenter Robotic and Laparoscopic Experience with Literature Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13174351. [PMID: 34503161 PMCID: PMC8431126 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent about 1–3% of all gastrointestinal malignancies, of which 50–60% are gastric GISTs (GGs). To the date, surgery represents the best therapeutic option, and the robotic gastric surgery could gain an important role, overcoming many laparoscopic drawbacks. The aim of this study is to evaluate safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for GGs, reporting 10-year experience of three different centers. We included a population of 81 patients who underwent MIS approaches (36 laparoscopy vs. 45 robotic surgery). Seventy-two (72) patients were enrolled in a follow-up program to evaluate the long-term oncological outcomes. Furthermore, we discussed some technical notes and also we analyzed the operative and peri-operative outcomes. In conclusion, our results suggest that the robotic approach might be a suitable treatment, especially for GISTs >5 cm, even located in unfavorable places, despite longer operative time and costs than laparoscopic approach. Abstract Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are most frequently located in the stomach. In the setting of a multidisciplinary approach, surgery represents the best therapeutic option, consisting mainly in a wedge gastric resection. (1) Materials and methods: Between January 2010 to September 2020, 105 patients with a primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GISTs) located in the stomach, underwent surgery at three surgical units. (2) Results: A multi-institutional analysis of minimally invasive series including 81 cases (36 laparoscopic and 45 robotic) from 3 referral centers was performed. Males were 35 (43.2%), the average age was 66.64 years old. ASA score ≥3 was 6 (13.3%) in the RS and 4 (11.1%) in the LS and the average tumor size was 4.4 cm. Most of the procedures were wedge resections (N = 76; 93.8%) and the main operative time was 151 min in the RS and 97 min in the LS. Conversion was necessary in five cases (6.2%). (3) Conclusions: Minimal invasive approaches for gastric GISTs performed in selected patients and experienced centers are safe. A robotic approach represents a useful option, especially for GISTs that are more than 5 cm, even located in unfavorable places.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, 06034 Foligno, Italy; (G.C.); (G.C.); (W.B.); (P.T.); (A.B.); (A.P.); (L.M.)
- General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, ASL 2 Umbria, San Matteo Hospital, 06049 Spoleto, Italy
- General Surgery Unit, San Donato Hospital, 52100 Arezzo, Italy; (B.F.); (M.D.P.)
| | - Gianluca Costa
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, 06034 Foligno, Italy; (G.C.); (G.C.); (W.B.); (P.T.); (A.B.); (A.P.); (L.M.)
- General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, ASL 2 Umbria, San Matteo Hospital, 06049 Spoleto, Italy
- Surgery Center, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Michele De Rosa
- Department of General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, 06034 Perugia, Italy;
| | - Massimo Codacci Pisanelli
- UOC General Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of Surgery P. Valdoni, Policlinic Umberto I, Sapienza University of Study of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy;
| | - Barbara Frezza
- General Surgery Unit, San Donato Hospital, 52100 Arezzo, Italy; (B.F.); (M.D.P.)
| | - Marco De Prizio
- General Surgery Unit, San Donato Hospital, 52100 Arezzo, Italy; (B.F.); (M.D.P.)
| | - Ilaria Bravi
- Histopathology Department, Usl Umbria 2, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, 06034 Foligno, Italy;
| | - Andrea Scacchi
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (A.S.); (M.C.); (K.K.); (P.A.)
| | - Gaetano Gallo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, S. Rita Clinic, 13100 Vercelli, Italy
| | - Bruno Amato
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy;
| | - Walter Bugiantella
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, 06034 Foligno, Italy; (G.C.); (G.C.); (W.B.); (P.T.); (A.B.); (A.P.); (L.M.)
- General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, ASL 2 Umbria, San Matteo Hospital, 06049 Spoleto, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Tacchi
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, 06034 Foligno, Italy; (G.C.); (G.C.); (W.B.); (P.T.); (A.B.); (A.P.); (L.M.)
- General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, ASL 2 Umbria, San Matteo Hospital, 06049 Spoleto, Italy
| | - Alberto Bartoli
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, 06034 Foligno, Italy; (G.C.); (G.C.); (W.B.); (P.T.); (A.B.); (A.P.); (L.M.)
- General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, ASL 2 Umbria, San Matteo Hospital, 06049 Spoleto, Italy
| | - Alberto Patriti
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, 06034 Foligno, Italy; (G.C.); (G.C.); (W.B.); (P.T.); (A.B.); (A.P.); (L.M.)
- General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, ASL 2 Umbria, San Matteo Hospital, 06049 Spoleto, Italy
- Division of General Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, 61121 Pesaro, Italy
| | - Micaela Cappuccio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (A.S.); (M.C.); (K.K.); (P.A.)
| | - Klara Komici
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (A.S.); (M.C.); (K.K.); (P.A.)
| | - Lorenzo Mariani
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, 06034 Foligno, Italy; (G.C.); (G.C.); (W.B.); (P.T.); (A.B.); (A.P.); (L.M.)
- General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, ASL 2 Umbria, San Matteo Hospital, 06049 Spoleto, Italy
| | - Pasquale Avella
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (A.S.); (M.C.); (K.K.); (P.A.)
| | - Aldo Rocca
- General Surgery Unit, San Donato Hospital, 52100 Arezzo, Italy; (B.F.); (M.D.P.)
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (A.S.); (M.C.); (K.K.); (P.A.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cipriani F, Fiorentini G, Magistri P, Fontani A, Menonna F, Annecchiarico M, Lauterio A, De Carlis L, Coratti A, Boggi U, Ceccarelli G, Di Benedetto F, Aldrighetti L. Pure laparoscopic versus robotic liver resections: Multicentric propensity score-based analysis with stratification according to difficulty scores. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2021; 29:1108-1123. [PMID: 34291591 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted liver resections (LLR and RALR) are known in comparison to open surgery. The aim of the present retrospective comparative study is to investigate the role of RALR and LLR according to different levels of difficulty. METHODS The institutional databases of six high-volume hepatobiliary centers were retrospectively reviewed. The study population was divided in two groups: LLR and RALR. The procedures were stratified for difficulty levels accordingly to three classifications. A propensity score matching was implemented to mitigate selection bias. Short-term outcomes were the object of comparison. RESULTS Nine hundred and thirty-six LLR and 403 RALR were collected. RALR exhibited fewer cases of intraoperative blood loss, lower transfusion and conversion rates (especially for oncological radicality) than LLR in the setting of highly difficult operations, whereas LLR had lower postoperative morbidity and fewer low-grade complications. For intermediate and low-difficulty resections, the intraoperative advantages of RALR gradually decreased to nonsignificant results and LLR remained associated with lower postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSION Robot-assisted liver resections do not show operative nor clinically significant benefits over LLR for low- and intermediate-difficulty resections. By reducing conversion rates, RALR can favour the operative feasibility of difficult resections possibly extending the indications of minimally invasive approaches for liver resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Fiorentini
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,PhD School in Experimental Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Andrea Fontani
- General Surgery Division, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Francesca Menonna
- General and Transplant Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Mario Annecchiarico
- Division of Surgical Oncologic and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Lauterio
- Department of General Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of Surgical Oncologic and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- General and Transplant Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery Division, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy.,General Minimally invasive and Robotic Surgery Division, San Matteo degli Infermi Hospital, Spoleto, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sgaramella LI, Gurrado A, Pasculli A, de Angelis N, Memeo R, Prete FP, Berti S, Ceccarelli G, Rigamonti M, Badessi FGA, Solari N, Milone M, Catena F, Scabini S, Vittore F, Perrone G, de Werra C, Cafiero F, Testini M. The critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Strasberg Yes or No? An Italian Multicentre study. Surg Endosc 2021; 35:3698-3708. [PMID: 32780231 PMCID: PMC8195809 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07852-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the gold standard for the treatment of gallbladder lithiasis; nevertheless, the incidence of bile duct injuries (BDI) is still high (0.3-0.8%) compared to open cholecystectomy (0.2%). In 1995, Strasberg introduced the "Critical View of Safety" (CVS) to reduce the risk of BDI. Despite its widespread use, the scientific evidence supporting this technique to prevent BDI is controversial. METHODS Between March 2017 and March 2019, the data of patients submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 30 Italian surgical departments were collected on a national database. A survey was submitted to all members of Italian Digestive Pathology Society to obtain data on the preoperative workup, the surgical and postoperative management of patients and to judge, at the end of the procedure, if the isolation of the elements was performed according to the CVS. In the case of a declared critical view, iconographic documentation was obtained, finally reviewed by an external auditor. RESULTS Data from 604 patients were analysed. The study population was divided into two groups according to the evidence (Group A; n = 11) or absence (Group B; N = 593) of BDI and perioperative bleeding. The non-use of CVS was found in 54.6% of procedures in the Group A, and 25.8% in the Group B, and evaluating the operator-related variables the execution of CVS was associated with a significantly lower incidence of BDI and intraoperative bleeding. CONCLUSIONS The CVS confirmed to be the safest technique to recognize the elements of the Calot triangle and, if correctly performed, it significantly impacted on preventing intraoperative complications. Additional educational programs on the correct application of CVS in clinical practice would be desirable to avoid extreme conditions that may require additional procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Ilaria Sgaramella
- Unit of General Surgery “V. Bonomo”, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Policlinico, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Angela Gurrado
- Unit of General Surgery “V. Bonomo”, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Policlinico, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pasculli
- Unit of General Surgery “V. Bonomo”, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Policlinico, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Nicola de Angelis
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor Hospital, Université Paris-Est (UEP), Créteil, France
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University “Aldo Moro” of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Paolo Prete
- Unit of General Surgery “V. Bonomo”, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Policlinico, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Stefano Berti
- Department of General Surgery, “Sant’Andrea” Hospital La Spezia, La Spezia, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100 Arezzo, Italy
| | | | | | - Nicola Solari
- Department of Surgery, IRCSS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II” University, Napoli, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Stefano Scabini
- Department of Surgery, IRCSS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesco Vittore
- Unit of General Surgery “V. Bonomo”, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Policlinico, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Gennaro Perrone
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Carlo de Werra
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II” University, Napoli, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Cafiero
- Department of Surgery, IRCSS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Mario Testini
- Unit of General Surgery “V. Bonomo”, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Policlinico, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nunnari P, Ceccarelli G, Ladiana N, Notaro P. Prescribing cascades and medications most frequently involved in pain therapy: a review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2021; 25:1034-1041. [PMID: 33577059 DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202101_24673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aging of the population and chronic pain represents topical issues in developed countries. These often translate into polypharmacy, inappropriate medications, and adverse drug events, with the risk of misinterpreting these latter with new medical conditions, generating what is referred to prescribing cascade. Prescribing cascades may lead to the prescription of new drugs, which could cause new potential side effects and unnecessary costs for individuals and healthcare systems. Therefore, the purpose of our review was to collect a good deal of prescribing cascades examples involving pain therapy medicines, to help clinicians minimize drug-related clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS We search in MEDLINE database through PubMed, including 31 studies and 80 different examples of prescribing cascades. RESULTS The medications most commonly resulting in the initial drug therapy prescribed were represented by psychoanaleptics (27/80, 33.7%). Among adverse drug events, the most common one, misinterpreted as a new medical condition, was represented by tremor and extrapyramidal symptoms (20/80, 25%). As regards the new drug therapies prescribed for adverse drug events, the therapeutic subgroups most commonly resulting in the new drug therapy prescribed were represented by psycholeptics (12/80, 15%), and by anti-Parkinson drugs (12/80, 15%). CONCLUSIONS This study provides a list of several examples of prescribing cascades in pain medicine and is essential to raise awareness of the potential dangers they could involve in all patient populations. Collaboration between clinicians and clinical pharmacologists may lead to more appropriate polypharmacy schemes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Nunnari
- Pain Medicine, Neuroscience Department, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 3, Ospedale Maggiore Square, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Costa G, Fransvea P, Lepre L, Rondelli F, Costa A, Campanelli M, Lisi G, Mastrangeli MR, Laracca GG, Garbarino GM, Ceccarelli G. 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: A propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:597-619. [PMID: 34194617 PMCID: PMC8223707 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i6.597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of laparoscopic approach for right colectomy have been well established. However, the technical difficulty to construct the intra-corporeal anastomosis is still cumbersome.
AIM To analyze the results of 3D and 2D laparoscopic right colectomy and to compare it to the published series through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS A retrospective study with propensity score matching analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic right colectomy at Umbria2 Hospitals from January 2014 to March 2020 was performed. A systematic review was accomplished comparing 2D and 3D right colectomy.
RESULTS In the personal series 47 patients of the 2D group were matched to 47 patients of the 3D group. The 3D group showed a favorable trend in terms of mean operative time (170.7 ± 32.9 min vs 183.8 ± 35.4 min; P = 0.053) and a significant lower anastomotic time (16.9 ± 2.3 min vs 19.6 ± 2.9 min, P < 0.001). The complete mesocolic excision (CME) subgroups analysis showed a shorter anastomotic time (16.5 ± 1.8 min vs 19.9 ± 3.0 min; P < 0.001) and operative time (175.0 ± 38.5 min vs 193.7 ± 37.1 min; P = 0.063) in the 3D group. Six studies and our series were included in the meta-analysis with 551 patients (2D group: 291; 3D group: 260).The pooled analysis demonstrated a significant difference in favour of the 3D group regarding the operative time (P < 0.001) and the anastomotic time (P < 0.001) while no differences were identified between groups in terms of blood loss (P = 0.827), LNH yield (P = 0.243), time to first flatus (P = 0.333), postoperative complications (P = 0.718) and length of stay (P = 0.835).
CONCLUSION The meta-analysis results showed that 3D laparoscopic right colectomy shortens operative and anastomotic time without affecting the standard lymphadenectomy. In our series, the advantage of the 3D system becomes evident when CME and/or more complex associated procedure are requested significantly reducing both the total operative and the anastomotic time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pietro Fransvea
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy
| | - Luca Lepre
- General Surgery Unit, Santo Spirito in Sassia Hospital, Rome 00193, Italy
| | - Fabio Rondelli
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Perugia, Santa Maria Teaching Hospital, Terni 05100, Italy
| | - Alessandro Costa
- Catholic University “Our Lady of Good Council” School of Medicine, Tirane 1023, Albania
| | - Michela Campanelli
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Giorgio Lisi
- Department of General Surgery, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, Rome 00144, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Guglielmo Laracca
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome 00189, Italy
| | - Giovanni Maria Garbarino
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome 00189, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rondelli F, Sanguinetti A, Polistena A, Avenia S, Marcacci C, Ceccarelli G, Bugiantella W, De Rosa M. Robotic Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (RTaTME): State of the Art. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11060584. [PMID: 34205596 PMCID: PMC8233761 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11060584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 06/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the gold standard technique for the surgical management of rectal cancer. The transanal approach to the mesorectum was introduced to overcome the technical difficulties related to the distal rectal dissection. Since its inception, interest in transanal mesorectal excision has grown exponentially and it appears that the benefits are maximal in patients with mid-low rectal cancer where anatomical and pathological features represent the greatest challenges. Current evidence demonstrates that this approach is safe and feasible, with oncological and functional outcome comparable to conventional approaches, but with specific complications related to the technique. Robotics might potentially simplify the technical steps of distal rectal dissection, with a shorter learning curve compared to the laparoscopic transanal approach, but with higher costs. The objective of this review is to critically analyze the available literature concerning robotic transanal TME in order to define its role in the management of rectal cancer and to depict future perspectives in this field of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Rondelli
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, University of Perugia, “S. Maria” Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy; (F.R.); (A.S.); (S.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Alessandro Sanguinetti
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, University of Perugia, “S. Maria” Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy; (F.R.); (A.S.); (S.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Andrea Polistena
- Department of General and Laparoscopic Surgery–University Hospital, University of Rome, “Umberto I”, 00161 Rome, Italy;
| | - Stefano Avenia
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, University of Perugia, “S. Maria” Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy; (F.R.); (A.S.); (S.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Claudio Marcacci
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, University of Perugia, “S. Maria” Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy; (F.R.); (A.S.); (S.A.); (C.M.)
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- Department of General and Robotic Surgery, “San Giovanni Battista” Hospital, USL Umbria 2, 06034 Foligno, Italy; (G.C.); (W.B.)
| | - Walter Bugiantella
- Department of General and Robotic Surgery, “San Giovanni Battista” Hospital, USL Umbria 2, 06034 Foligno, Italy; (G.C.); (W.B.)
| | - Michele De Rosa
- Department of General and Robotic Surgery, “San Giovanni Battista” Hospital, USL Umbria 2, 06034 Foligno, Italy; (G.C.); (W.B.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Baccolini V, Migliara G, Isonne C, Dorelli B, Barone LC, Giannini D, Marotta D, Marte M, Mazzalai E, Alessandri F, Pugliese F, Ceccarelli G, De Vito C, Marzuillo C, De Giusti M, Villari P. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare-associated infections in intensive care unit patients: a retrospective cohort study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2021; 10:87. [PMID: 34088341 PMCID: PMC8177262 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-021-00959-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background During the intensive care units’ (ICUs) reorganization that was forced by the COVID-19 emergency, attention to traditional infection control measures may have been reduced. Nevertheless, evidence on the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) is still limited and mixed. In this study, we estimated the pandemic impact on HAI incidence and investigated the HAI type occurring in COVID-19 patients. Methods Patients admitted to the main ICU of the Umberto I teaching hospital of Rome from March 1st and April 4th 2020 were compared with patients hospitalized in 2019. We assessed the association of risk factors and time-to-first event through multivariable Fine and Grey’s regression models, that consider the competitive risk of death on the development of HAI (Model 1) or device related-HAI (dr-HAI, Model 2) and provide estimates of the sub-distribution hazard ratio (SHR) and its associated confidence interval (CI). A subgroup analysis was performed on the 2020 cohort. Results Data from 104 patients were retrieved. Overall, 59 HAIs were recorded, 32 of which occurred in the COVID-19 group. Patients admitted in 2020 were found to be positively associated with both HAI and dr-HAI onset (SHR: 2.66, 95% CI 1.31–5.38, and SHR: 10.0, 95% CI 1.84–54.41, respectively). Despite being not confirmed at the multivariable analysis, a greater proportion of dr-HAIs seemed to occur in COVID-19 patients, especially ventilator-associated pneumonia, and catheter-related urinary tract infections. Conclusions We observed an increase in the incidence of patients with HAIs, especially dr-HAIs, mainly sustained by COVID-19 patients. A greater susceptibility of these patients to device-related infections was hypothesized, but further studies are needed. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-021-00959-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Baccolini
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
| | - G Migliara
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - C Isonne
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - B Dorelli
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - L C Barone
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - D Giannini
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - D Marotta
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - M Marte
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - E Mazzalai
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - F Alessandri
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Umberto I Teaching Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - F Pugliese
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Umberto I Teaching Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,Department of General and Specialist Surgery "P. Stefanini", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - G Ceccarelli
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - C De Vito
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - C Marzuillo
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - M De Giusti
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - P Villari
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ceccarelli G, Rocca A, De Rosa M, Fontani A, Ermili F, Andolfi E, Bugiantella W, Levi Sandri GB. Correction to: Minimally invasive robotic-assisted combined colorectal and liver excision surgery: feasibility, safety and surgical technique in a pilot series. Updates Surg 2021; 73:1023-1027. [PMID: 33970451 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01057-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Graziano Ceccarelli
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy. .,San Donato Hospital, General and Robotic Surgery Unit, Arezzo, Italy.
| | - Aldo Rocca
- San Donato Hospital, General and Robotic Surgery Unit, Arezzo, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Via Francesco de Sanctis, 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Michele De Rosa
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Andrea Fontani
- San Donato Hospital, General and Robotic Surgery Unit, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Fabio Ermili
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Enrico Andolfi
- San Donato Hospital, General and Robotic Surgery Unit, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Walter Bugiantella
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Polo Ospedaliero Interaziendale Trapianti (POIT), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
DE Rosa M, Pasculli A, Rondelli F, Mariani L, Avenia S, Ceccarelli G, Testini M, Avenia N, Bugiantella W. Could diagnostic and therapeutic delay affect the prognosis of gastrointestinal primary malignancies in the COVID-19 pandemic era? A literature review. Minerva Surg 2021; 76:467-476. [PMID: 33890444 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.21.08736-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emergency situations, as the Covid-19 pandemic that is striking the world nowadays, stress the national health systems which are forced to rapidly reorganizing their sources. Therefore, many elective diagnostic and surgical procedures are being suspended or significantly delayed. Moreover, patients might find it difficult to refer to physicians and delay the diagnostic and even the therapeutic procedures because of emotional or logistic problems. The effect of diagnostic and therapeutic delay on survival in patients affected by gastrointestinal malignancies is still unclear. METHODS We carried out a review of the available literature, in order to determine whether the delay in performing diagnosis and curative-intent surgical procedures affects the oncological outcomes in patients with oesophageal, gastric, colorectal cancers, and colorectal liver metastasis. RESULTS The findings indicate that for oesophageal, gastric and colon cancers delaying surgery up to 2 months after the end of the staging process does not worsen the oncological outcomes. Oesophageal cancer should undergo surgery within 7-8 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Rectal cancers should undergo surgery within 31 days after the diagnostic process and within 12 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy. Adjuvant therapy should start within 4 weeks after surgery, especially in gastric cancer; a delay up to 42 days may be allowed for oesophageal cancer undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Gastrointestinal malignancies can be safely managed taking into account that reasonable delays of planned treatments appear a generally safe approach, not having a significant impact on long-term oncological outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele DE Rosa
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pasculli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology - Unit Of Endocrine, Digestive And Emergency Surgery, University A. Moro of Bari, Polyclinic of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Fabio Rondelli
- General and Specialized Surgery, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy.,Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Mariani
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Stefano Avenia
- Postgraduate School of General Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Mario Testini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology - Unit Of Endocrine, Digestive And Emergency Surgery, University A. Moro of Bari, Polyclinic of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Nicola Avenia
- General and Specialized Surgery, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy.,Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Walter Bugiantella
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Perugia, Italy -
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Baiocchi GL, Guercioni G, Vettoretto N, Scabini S, Millo P, Muratore A, Clementi M, Sica G, Delrio P, Longo G, Anania G, Barbieri V, Amodio P, Di Marco C, Baldazzi G, Garulli G, Patriti A, Pirozzi F, De Luca R, Mancini S, Pedrazzani C, Scaramuzzi M, Scatizzi M, Taglietti L, Motter M, Ceccarelli G, Totis M, Gennai A, Frazzini D, Di Mauro G, Capolupo GT, Crafa F, Marini P, Ruffo G, Persiani R, Borghi F, de Manzini N, Catarci M. ICG fluorescence imaging in colorectal surgery: a snapshot from the ICRAL study group. BMC Surg 2021; 21:190. [PMID: 33838677 PMCID: PMC8035779 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01191-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Fluorescence-guided visualization is a recently proposed technology in colorectal surgery. Possible uses include evaluating perfusion, navigating lymph nodes and searching for hepatic metastases and peritoneal spread. Despite the absence of high-level evidence, this technique has gained considerable popularity among colorectal surgeons due to its significant reliability, safety, ease of use and relatively low cost. However, the actual use of this technique in daily clinical practice has not been reported to date. Methods This survey was conducted on April 2020 among 44 centers dealing with colorectal diseases and participating in the Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group. Surgeons were approximately equally divided based on geographical criteria from multiple Italian regions, with a large proportion based in public (89.1%) and nonacademic (75.7%) centers. They were invited to answer an online survey to snapshot their current behaviors regarding the use of fluorescence-guided visualization in colorectal surgery. Questions regarding technological availability, indications and techniques, personal approaches and feelings were collected in a 23-item questionnaire. Results Questionnaire replies were received from 37 institutions and partially answered by 8, as this latter group of centers do not implement fluorescence technology (21.6%). Out of the remaining 29 centers (78,4%), fluorescence is utilized in all laparoscopic colorectal resections by 72.4% of surgeons and only for selected cases by the remaining 27.6%, while 62.1% of respondents do not use fluorescence in open surgery (unless the perfusion is macroscopically uncertain with the naked eye, in which case 41.4% of them do). The survey also suggests that there is no agreement on dilution, dosing and timing, as many different practices are adopted based on personal judgment. Only approximately half of the surgeons reported a reduced leak rate with fluorescence perfusion assessment, but 65.5% of them strongly believe that this technique will become a minimum requirement for colorectal surgery in the future. Conclusion The survey confirms that fluorescence is becoming a widely used technique in colorectal surgery. However, both the indications and methods still vary considerably; furthermore, the surgeons' perceptions of the results are insufficient to consider this technology essential. This survey emphasizes the need for further research to reach recommendations based on solid scientific evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Luca Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
| | | | - Nereo Vettoretto
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Montichiari, BS, Italy
| | - Stefano Scabini
- General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, National Cancer Center "San Martino", Genova, Italy
| | - Paolo Millo
- General Surgery Unit, Aosta Regional Hospital, Aosta, Italy
| | | | - Marco Clementi
- General Surgery Unit, University Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sica
- General Surgery Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata University Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS G. Pascale Foundation, Napoli, Italy
| | | | | | - Vittoria Barbieri
- General Surgery Unit, Cardinale G. Panico Hospital, Tricase, LE, Italy
| | - Pietro Amodio
- General Surgery Unit, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Carlo Di Marco
- General Surgery Unit, Conegliano Hospital (TV) ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Conegliano, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Patriti
- General Surgery Unit, Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro e Fano, PU, Italy
| | - Felice Pirozzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASL Napoli2 Hospital, Pozzuoli, NA, Italy
| | - Raffaele De Luca
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancini
- General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Scaramuzzi
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
| | - Marco Scatizzi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | | | - Michele Motter
- General Surgery Unit 1, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | | | - Mauro Totis
- General Surgery Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Andrea Gennai
- General Surgery Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Spezia, Italy
| | - Diletta Frazzini
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale Civile Di Pescara, Pescara, Italy
| | | | | | - Francesco Crafa
- General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, VR, Italy
| | - Roberto Persiani
- Minimally Invasive Oncologic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Gemelli Foundation, Roma, Italy
| | - Felice Borghi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Croce E Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | - Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, CG Mazzoni Hospital, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ceccarelli G, Rocca A, De Rosa M, Fontani A, Ermili F, Andolfi E, Bugiantella W, Levi Sandri GB. Minimally invasive robotic-assisted combined colorectal and liver excision surgery: feasibility, safety and surgical technique in a pilot series. Updates Surg 2021; 73:1015-1022. [PMID: 33830484 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01009-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Different strategies may be adopted in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (LM). The role of laparoscopy has been investigated to define the benefits of minimally invasive surgery in a single-stage operation. In our study, we report our experience of 28 Minimally Invasive Robotic-Assisted combined Colorectal and Liver Excision Surgery (MIRACLES). From October 2012 to December 2019, 135 Robotic liver resections and 218 Robotic Colorectal resections were performed in our center. Twenty-eight patients underwent MIRACLES resection with 37 nodules removed. Fifty-two lesions in 28 patients were resected in minimally invasive robot-assisted surgery. Eighteen lesions were located in postero-superior liver segments (eight in segment VII, two in segment VIII, eight in segment IVa). Nine right colectomies, seven left colectomies, ten anterior rectal resections, one Hartmann and one MILES procedures were performed. The median surgical time of MIRACLES procedures was 332 min. Two conversions to open approach were necessary. Four major complications (> III) were observed. No postoperative mortality was recorded. The median hospital stay was 8 days. The median overall survival was 27.5 months. The MIRACLES approach is feasible and safe for colorectal resection and hepatic nodules located in all segments, with a low rate of postoperative complications. Surgical technique is demanding and should be reserved, presently, to tertiary centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graziano Ceccarelli
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy. .,San Donato Hospital, General and Robotic Surgery Unit, Arezzo, Italy.
| | - Aldo Rocca
- San Donato Hospital, General and Robotic Surgery Unit, Arezzo, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Via Francesco de Sanctis, 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Michele De Rosa
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Andrea Fontani
- San Donato Hospital, General and Robotic Surgery Unit, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Fabio Ermili
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Enrico Andolfi
- San Donato Hospital, General and Robotic Surgery Unit, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Walter Bugiantella
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Polo Ospedaliero Interaziendale Trapianti (POIT), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
D'Ettorre G, Caroli A, Pellicani V, Ceccarelli G. Preliminary risk assessment of workplace violence in hospital emergency departments. Ann Ig 2021; 32:99-108. [PMID: 31944205 DOI: 10.7416/ai.2020.2334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk assessment of workplace violence in emergency departments represents a global challenge for both healthcare organizations and workers. Recent studies have revealed increased rates of workplace violence towards physicians and nurses employed in emergency departments and have shown that type II is the most common typology of workplace violence among the four types of workplace violence defined by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. The present study aimed to develop a methodological technique for a preliminary assessment of type II workplace violence risk in emergency departments. METHODS The Delphi method was used to develop a questionnaire entitled Emergency Department Workplace Violence-Questionnaire which was composed of two sections: 1) sentinel events, and 2) risk factors. The authors used the Emergency Department Workplace Violence-Questionnaire to evaluate the workplace violence risk among physicians and nurses employed in a hospital emergency department. RESULTS The Emergency Department Workplace Violence-Questionnaire was composed of 21 items. The sentinel events section consisted of three company indicators related to workplace violence and identified three areas of risk. The risk factors section identified 18 organizational and environmental factors associated with workplace violence occurrence. The assessment of workplace violence risk in the targeted hospital emergency departments, obtained through the use of the Emergency Department Workplace Violence-Questionnaire, showed a medium risk of workplace violence for both physicians (score=18) and nurses (score=19.5); the analysis found objective risk factors associated with workplace violence and led us to suggest organizational and environmental interventions for reducing the sources of risk among healthcare workers and to prioritize the interventions targeted at the problematical issues detected by the Emergency Department Workplace Violence-Questionnaire. The corrective interventions were focused on an engineering level (i.e. absence of areas for patients/clients to de-escalate, absence of alarm systems) and regarding the organizational environment (i.e. absence of a Workplace Violence Task Force to assess workplace violence risk and develop solutions, working alone). CONCLUSION The proposed questionnaire proved to be a valid, structured, and reliable tool for assessing the risk of workplace violence in the targeted emergency departments and allowed for the identification of improvement actions targeted at specific critical issues which could be minimized through strategic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G D'Ettorre
- Department of Occupational Medicine, Health Unit of Occupational Prevention and Protection, Local Health Authority, Brindisi, Italy
| | - A Caroli
- Department of Occupational Medicine, Health Unit of Occupational Prevention and Protection, Local Health Authority, Brindisi, Italy
| | - V Pellicani
- Department of Mental Health, Local Health Authority, Lecce, Italy
| | - G Ceccarelli
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Oliva A, Siccardi G, Migliarini A, Cancelli F, Carnevalini M, D'Andria M, Attilia I, Danese VC, Cecchetti V, Romiti R, Ceccarelli G, Mastroianni CM, Palange P, Venditti M. Co-infection of SARS-CoV-2 with Chlamydia or Mycoplasma pneumoniae: a case series and review of the literature. Infection 2020; 48:871-877. [PMID: 32725598 PMCID: PMC7386385 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-020-01483-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has spread all over the world causing a global pandemic and representing a great medical challenge. Nowadays, there is limited knowledge on the rate of co-infections with other respiratory pathogens, with viral co-infection being the most representative agents. Co-infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae has been described both in adults and pediatrics whereas only two cases of Chlamydia pneumoniae have been reported in a large US study so far. METHODS In the present report, we describe a series of seven patients where co-infection with C. pneumoniae (n = 5) or M. pneumoniae (n = 2) and SARS-CoV-2 was detected in a large teaching hospital in Rome. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION An extensive review of the updated literature regarding the co-infection between SARS-CoV-2 and these atypical pathogens is also performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Oliva
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
| | - G Siccardi
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - A Migliarini
- Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - F Cancelli
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - M Carnevalini
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - M D'Andria
- Department of Clinical, Internal, Anestesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - I Attilia
- Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - V C Danese
- Department of Clinical, Internal, Anestesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - V Cecchetti
- Department of Clinical, Internal, Anestesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - R Romiti
- Department of Clinical, Internal, Anestesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - G Ceccarelli
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - C M Mastroianni
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - P Palange
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - M Venditti
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Garbarino GM, Costa G, Frezza B, Biancafarina A, Balducci G, Mercantini P, De Prizio M, Laracca GG, Ceccarelli G. Robotic versus open oncological gastric surgery in the elderly: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Robot Surg 2020; 15:741-749. [PMID: 33151485 PMCID: PMC8423642 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01168-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Although there is no agreement on a definition of elderly, commonly an age cutoff of ≥ 65 or 75 years is used. Even if robot-assisted surgery is a validated option for the elderly population, there are no specific indications for its application in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted gastrectomy and to compare the short and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted (RG) versus open gastrectomy (OG). Patients aged ≥ 70 years old undergoing surgery for gastric cancer at the Department of Surgery of San Donato Hospital in Arezzo, between September 2012 and March 2017 were enrolled. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed according to the following variables: age, Sex, BMI, ASA score, comorbidity, T stage and type of resection performed. 43 OG were matched to 43 RG. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the RG group (273.8 vs. 193.5 min, p < 0.01). No differences were observed in terms of intraoperative blood loss, an average number of lymph nodes removed, mean hospital stay, morbidity and mortality. OG had higher rate of major complications (6.9 vs. 16.3%, OR 2.592, 95% CI 0.623–10.785, p = 0.313) and a significantly higher postoperative pain (0.95 vs. 1.24, p = 0.042). Overall survival (p = 0.263) and disease-free survival (p = 0.474) were comparable between groups. Robotic-assisted surgery for oncological gastrectomy in elderly patients is safe and effective showing non-inferiority comparing to the open technique in terms of perioperative outcomes and overall 5-year survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Maria Garbarino
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189, Rome, Italy.
| | - Gianluca Costa
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Frezza
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189, Rome, Italy.,Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Alessia Biancafarina
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Genoveffa Balducci
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Mercantini
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco De Prizio
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Giovanni Gugliemo Laracca
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100, Arezzo, Italy.,Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Local Health Service Umbria 2, via Massimo Arcamone 1, 06034, Foligno, PG, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ceccarelli G, Pasculli A, Bugiantella W, De Rosa M, Catena F, Rondelli F, Costa G, Rocca A, Longaroni M, Testini M. Minimally invasive laparoscopic and robot-assisted emergency treatment of strangulated giant hiatal hernias: report of five cases and literature review. World J Emerg Surg 2020; 15:37. [PMID: 32487136 PMCID: PMC7268602 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-020-00316-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Giant hiatal hernia (GHH) is a condition where one-third of the stomach migrates into the thorax. Nowadays, laparoscopic treatment gives excellent postoperative outcomes. Strangulated GHH is rare, and its emergent repair is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. We report a series of five cases of strangulated GHH treated by a minimally invasive laparoscopic and robot-assisted approach, together with a systematic review of the literature. Methods During 10 years (December 2009–December 2019), 31 patients affected by GHH were treated by robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgical approach. Among them, five cases were treated in an emergency setting. We performed a PubMed MEDLINE search about the minimally invasive emergent treatment of GHH, selecting 18 articles for review. Results The five cases were male patients with a mean age of 70 ± 18 years. All patients referred to the emergency service complaining of severe abdominal and thoracic pain, nausea and vomiting. CT scan and endoscopy were the main diagnostic tools. All patients showed stable hemodynamic conditions so that they could undergo a minimally invasive attempt. The surgical approach was robotic-assisted in three patients (60%) and laparoscopic in two (40%). Patients reported no complications or recurrences. Conclusion Reviewing current literature, no general recommendations are available about the emergent treatment of strangulated hiatal hernia. Acute mechanical outlet obstruction, ischemia of gastric wall or perforation and severe bleeding are the reasons for an emergent surgical indication. In stable conditions, a minimally invasive approach is often feasible. Moreover, the robot-assisted approach, allowing a stable 3D view and using articulated instruments, represents a reasonable option in challenging situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone 1, 06034, Foligno, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pasculli
- Unit of General Surgery "V. Bonomo", Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "A. Moro", Polyclinic of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| | - Walter Bugiantella
- General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone 1, 06034, Foligno, Italy
| | - Michele De Rosa
- General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone 1, 06034, Foligno, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Viale Antonio Gramsci 11, 43126, Parma, Italy
| | - Fabio Rondelli
- General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone 1, 06034, Foligno, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costa
- General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone 1, 06034, Foligno, Italy
| | - Aldo Rocca
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Via Francesco de Sanctis 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Mattia Longaroni
- General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone 1, 06034, Foligno, Italy
| | - Mario Testini
- Unit of General Surgery "V. Bonomo", Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "A. Moro", Polyclinic of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ceccarelli G, Costa G, Ferraro V, De Rosa M, Rondelli F, Bugiantella W. Robotic or three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and intracorporeal anastomosis? A propensity score-matching study comparison. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:2039-2048. [PMID: 32372219 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07600-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We describe our preliminary experience in complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) and intracorporeal anastomosis for right colon cancer, comparing the robotic and the three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic approach. METHODS We performed a retrospective observational clinical cohort study on patients who underwent radical curative surgical resection of right colon cancer with CME from January 2014 to June 2019. Propensity scores were calculated by bivariate logistic regression, including the following variables: age, BMI, and size of tumor. RESULTS Fifty-five patients underwent CME with CVL: 26 by means of robot-assisted surgery and 29 by means of 3D laparoscopic procedure. There were not statistically significant differences about all the intra- and postoperative outcomes (operative time, length of the specimen, time to bowel canalization, time to soft oral intake, length of hospital stay, postoperative complication, number of retrieved lymph nodes, number of positive lymph nodes and lymph node ratio) between the robotic and the 3D laparoscopic approach. After the matching procedure, 20 patients of the robotic group and 20 patients of the 3D laparoscopic group were selected for the analysis. There were no differences in any of the analyzed variables between the two groups except for longer operative time in the robotic group (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION The 3D vision revealed an important advantage in order to achieve the correct identification of surgical anatomy allowing a safe and effective right colectomy with CME, CVL, and intracorporeal anastomosis, either using laparoscopic or with robotic approach, providing similar short-term outcomes. Taking into account the high costs and the longer operative time of robotic procedure, the 3D laparoscopy could be considered in performing right colectomy with CME, while the robotic approach should be considered as a first choice approach for challenging situations (obese patient, complex associated procedures).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone, 1, 06034, Foligno, PG, Italy.,General Surgery, ASL Toscana Sud-Est, San Donato" Hospital, Via Pietro Nenni, 1, 52100, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costa
- Emergency Surgery Unit, "Sant'Andrea" Hospital, Sapienza" University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa, 1035, 00189, Roma, Italy
| | - Valentina Ferraro
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology - Unit Of Endocrine, Digestive And Emergency Surgery, Policlinic of Bari, University "A. Moro" of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 1, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Michele De Rosa
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone, 1, 06034, Foligno, PG, Italy
| | - Fabio Rondelli
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone, 1, 06034, Foligno, PG, Italy.,Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Walter Bugiantella
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Via Massimo Arcamone, 1, 06034, Foligno, PG, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Becattini C, Pace U, Rondelli F, Delrio P, Ceccarelli G, Boncompagni M, Graziosi L, Visonà A, Chiari D, Avruscio G, Frasson S, Gussoni G, Biancafarina A, Camporese G, Donini A, Bucci AF, Agnelli G. Rivaroxaban for extended antithrombotic prophylaxis after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Design of the PRO-LAPS II STUDY. Eur J Intern Med 2020; 72:53-59. [PMID: 31818628 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Revised: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical benefit of extending prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) beyond hospital discharge after laparoscopic surgery for cancer is undefined. Extended prophylaxis with rivaroxaban is effective in reducing post-operative VTE after major orthopedic surgery without safety concern. METHODS PROLAPS II is an investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blind study aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of extended antithrombotic prophylaxis with rivaroxaban compared with placebo after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in patients who had received antithrombotic prophylaxis with low molecular-weight heparin for 7 ± 2 days (NCT03055026). Patients are randomized to receive rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) or placebo for 3 weeks (up to day 28 ± 2 from surgery). The primary study outcome is a composite of symptomatic objectively confirmed VTE, asymptomatic ultrasonography-detected DVT or VTE-related death at 28 ± 2 days from laparoscopic surgery. The primary safety outcome is major bleeding defined according to the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Symptomatic objectively confirmed VTE, asymptomatic ultrasonography-detected DVT, major bleeding or death by day 28 ± 2 and by day 90 from surgery are secondary outcomes. Assuming an 8% event rate with placebo and 60% reduction in the primary study outcome with rivaroxaban, 323 patients per group are necessary to show a statistically significant difference between the study groups. DISCUSSION The PROLAPS II is the first study with an oral anti-Xa agent in cancer surgery. The study has the potential to improve clinical practice by answering the question on the clinical benefit of extending prophylaxis after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Becattini
- Department of Internal and Cardiovascular Medicine and Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Italy.
| | - Ugo Pace
- National Cancer Institute, "G. Pascale" Foundation, Napoli, Italy.
| | - Fabio Rondelli
- Department of General Surgery, S. Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy.
| | - Paolo Delrio
- National Cancer Institute, "G. Pascale" Foundation, Napoli, Italy.
| | | | - Michela Boncompagni
- Department of General Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Luigina Graziosi
- Department of Oncology Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Adriana Visonà
- Department of Vascular Medicine, S.Giacomo Apostolo Hospital, Catelfranco Veneto, Treviso, Italy.
| | - Damiano Chiari
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Varese, Italy.
| | - Giampiero Avruscio
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Unit of Angiology, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
| | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Camporese
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Unit of Angiology, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
| | - Annibale Donini
- Department of Oncology Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | | | - Giancarlo Agnelli
- Department of Internal and Cardiovascular Medicine and Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Russolillo N, Aldrighetti L, Cillo U, Guglielmi A, Ettorre GM, Giuliante F, Mazzaferro V, Dalla Valle R, De Carlis L, Jovine E, Ferrero A, Ratti F, Lo Tesoriere R, Gringeri E, Ruzzenente A, Levi Sandri GB, Ardito F, Virdis M, Iaria M, Ferla F, Lombardi R, Di Benedetto F, Gruttadauria S, Boggi U, Torzilli G, Rossi E, Vincenti L, Berti S, Ceccarelli G, Belli G, Zamboni F, Calise F, Coratti A, Santambrogio R, Brolese A, Navarra G, Mezzatesta P, Zimmitti G, Ravaioli M. Risk-adjusted benchmarks in laparoscopic liver surgery in a national cohort. Br J Surg 2020; 107:845-853. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 09/17/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to assess the best achievable outcomes in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) after risk adjustment based on surgical technical difficulty using a national registry.
Methods
LLRs registered in the Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery registry from November 2014 to March 2018 were considered. Benchmarks were calculated according to the Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC™). LLRs at each centre were divided into three clusters (groups I, II and III) based on the Kawaguchi classification. ABCs for overall and major morbidity were calculated in each cluster. Multivariable analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for overall and major morbidity. Significant variables were used in further risk adjustment.
Results
A total of 1752 of 2263 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 1096 (62·6 per cent) in group I, 435 (24·8 per cent) in group II and 221 (12·6 per cent) in group III. The ABCs for overall morbidity (7·8, 14·2 and 26·4 per cent for grades I, II and II respectively) and major morbidity (1·4, 2·2 and 5·7 per cent) increased with the difficulty of LLR. Multivariable analysis showed an increased risk of overall morbidity associated with multiple LLRs (odds ratio (OR) 1·35), simultaneous intestinal resection (OR 3·76) and cirrhosis (OR 1·83), and an increased risk of major morbidity with intestinal resection (OR 4·61). ABCs for overall and major morbidity were 14·4 and 3·2 per cent respectively for multiple LLRs, 30 and 11·1 per cent for intestinal resection, and 14·9 and 4·8 per cent for cirrhosis.
Conclusion
Overall morbidity benchmarks for LLR ranged from 7·8 to 26·4 per cent, and those for major morbidity from 1·4 to 5·7 per cent, depending on complexity. Benchmark values should be adjusted according to multiple LLRs or simultaneous intestinal resection and cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - L Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - U Cillo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - A Guglielmi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, G. B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - G M Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - F Giuliante
- Unit of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Foundation ‘Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli’, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - V Mazzaferro
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - R Dalla Valle
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - L De Carlis
- Surgical and Transplant Department, Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriali Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - E Jovine
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Viganò L, Cimino M, Aldrighetti L, Ferrero A, Cillo U, Guglielmi A, Ettorre GM, Giuliante F, Dalla Valle R, Mazzaferro V, Jovine E, De Carlis L, Calise F, Torzilli G, Ratti F, Gringeri E, Russolillo N, Levi Sandri GB, Ardito F, Boggi U, Gruttadauria S, Di Benedetto F, Rossi GE, Berti S, Ceccarelli G, Vincenti L, Belli G, Zamboni F, Coratti A, Mezzatesta P, Santambrogio R, Navarra G, Giuliani A, Pinna AD, Parisi A, Colledan M, Slim A, Antonucci A, Grazi GL, Frena A, Sgroi G, Brolese A, Morelli L, Floridi A, Patriti A, Veneroni L, Boni L, Maida P, Griseri G, Filauro M, Guerriero S, Tisone G, Romito R, Tedeschi U, Zimmitti G. Multicentre evaluation of case volume in minimally invasive hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2019; 107:443-451. [PMID: 32167174 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Surgical outcomes may be associated with hospital volume and the influence of volume on minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) is not known.
Methods
Patients entered into the prospective registry of the Italian Group of MILS from 2014 to 2018 were considered. Only centres with an accrual period of at least 12 months and stable MILS activity during the enrolment period were included. Case volume was defined by the mean number of minimally invasive liver resections performed per month (MILS/month).
Results
A total of 2225 MILS operations were undertaken by 46 centres; nine centres performed more than two MILS/month (1376 patients) and 37 centres carried out two or fewer MILS/month (849 patients). The proportion of resections of anterolateral segments decreased with case volume, whereas that of major hepatectomies increased. Left lateral sectionectomies and resections of anterolateral segments had similar outcome in the two groups. Resections of posterosuperior segments and major hepatectomies had higher overall and severe morbidity rates in centres performing two or fewer MILS/month than in those undertaking a larger number (posterosuperior segments resections: overall morbidity 30·4 versus 18·7 per cent respectively, and severe morbidity 9·9 versus 4·0 per cent; left hepatectomy: 46 versus 22 per cent, and 19 versus 5 per cent; right hepatectomy: 42 versus 34 per cent, and 25 versus 15 per cent).
Conclusion
A volume–outcome association existed for minimally invasive hepatectomy. Complex and major resections may be best managed in high-volume centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Viganò
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - M Cimino
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - L Aldrighetti
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - A Ferrero
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - U Cillo
- Hepato-Biliary and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - A Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - G M Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - F Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, A. Gemelli Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - R Dalla Valle
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - V Mazzaferro
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - E Jovine
- Department of Surgery, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - L De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - F Calise
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Pinetagrande Hospital, Castelvolturno, Italy
| | - G Torzilli
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - F Ratti
- Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan
| | | | | | | | | | - U Boggi
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (AOU) Pisana, Pisa
| | - S Gruttadauria
- Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione, Palermo
| | | | - G E Rossi
- Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan
| | - S Berti
- Ospedale Civile S. Andrea, La Spezia
| | | | | | - G Belli
- Ospedale Santa Maria di Loreto Nuovo, Naples
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - A D Pinna
- Policlinico Sant'Orsola Malpighi, Bologne
| | | | | | - A Slim
- AO Desio e Vimercate, Vimercate
| | | | - G L Grazi
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, Rome
| | | | - G Sgroi
- AO Treviglio-Caravaggio, Treviglio
| | | | | | | | - A Patriti
- Ospedale San Matteo degli Infermi, Spoleto
| | | | - L Boni
- AOU Fondazione Macchi, Varese
| | - P Maida
- Ospedale Villa Betania, Naples
| | | | | | | | | | - R Romito
- AOU Maggiore della Carità, Novara
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
D'Ettorre G, Vullo A, Pellicani V, Ceccarelli G. Preliminary assessment of rotating shiftwork risk in a twenty-four hours hospital department. Ann Ig 2019; 30:297-306. [PMID: 29895047 DOI: 10.7416/ai.2018.2221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety and health of healthcare workers employed in twenty-four-hour hospital wards and exposed to rotational shiftwork (RS), including night shift, is an hot topic of international literature; in fact shift workers incur increased rates of burnout, accidents and injuries, absenteeism and, consequently, reduced work efficiency than non-shift workers. The aims of the present study were: 1) to analyze the occupational risk associated with RS in healthcare sector and 2) to detect the consequent interventions effective in minimizing RS risk. METHODS The authors designed a questionnaire entitled Rotating Shiftwork Questionnaire (RSQ) which is made up of two sections: 1) Sentinel Events; 2) Risk Factors. The authors used the RSQ to evaluate the RS-Risk among homogeneous groups employed in a twenty-four-hour hospital department. RESULTS Results. The authors found a medium level of risk among all homogeneous groups. The analysis led to suggest organizational interventions for reducing the sources of RS-risk among healthcare workers. CONCLUSION The proposed questionnaire revealed effective in approaching the assessment of RS-risk; the findings were also useful in prioritizing and implementing strategic interventions aimed to moderate the occupational risk related to RS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G D'Ettorre
- Department of Occupational Medicine, Unit of Occupational Prevention and Protection, Local Health Authority, Brindisi, Italy
| | - A Vullo
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - V Pellicani
- Department of Mental Health, Local Health Authority, Lecce, Italy
| | - G Ceccarelli
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
d'Ettorre G, Vullo A, Pellicani V, Ceccarelli G. Acute low back pain among registered nurses. Organizational implications for practice management. Ann Ig 2019; 30:482-489. [PMID: 30614497 DOI: 10.7416/ai.2018.2248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date there is a lack of evidence about the impact of shiftwork on the occurrence of acute low back pain among registered nurses working non-traditional shifts, including nights and 12-hour shifts. The objectives of the present study were: 1) to investigate the impact of shiftwork, physical activity and body mass index on the occurrence of acute low back pain among female shift-registered nurses; 2) to suggest preventive interventions. METHODS The author conducted a cross-sectional nested case-control analysis of data concerning acute low back pain and staffing data for female registered nurses employed in hospital wards. RESULTS The analysis found a relationship between acute low back pain and nightshift, extended shifts, obesity; the adoption of forward rotating schedules proved to be effective in minimizing the frequency of acute low back pain. CONCLUSIONS The findings showed that the prevention of acute low back pain should consider interventions aimed at minimizing not only physical ergonomic factors, but also organizational risks and lifestyle factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G d'Ettorre
- Department of Occupational Medicine, Local Health Authority, Health Unit of Occupational Prevention and Protection, Brindisi, Italy
| | - A Vullo
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - V Pellicani
- Local Health Authority, Department of Mental Health, Lecce, Italy
| | - G Ceccarelli
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Costa G, Frezza B, Fransvea P, Massa G, Ferri M, Mercantini P, Balducci G, Buondonno A, Rocca A, Ceccarelli G. Clinico-pathological Features of Colon Cancer Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery: A Comparison Between Elderly and Non-elderly Patients. Open Med (Wars) 2019; 14:726-734. [PMID: 31637303 PMCID: PMC6778396 DOI: 10.1515/med-2019-0082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in patients older than 65 years. Emergency presentation represents about 30% of cases, with increased morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative outcome between elderly and non-elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery. Method We retrospectively analysed CRC patients that underwent emergency surgery at the Departments of Surgery of the Sapienza University Sant'Andrea Hospital in Rome, and at San Donato Hospital in Arezzo, between June 2012 and June 2017. Patients were divided into two groups: non-elderly (< 65 years) and elderly (≥ 65 years). Variables analysed were sex, onset symptoms, associated disease, ASA score, tumor site and TNM stage, surgical procedures and approach, and morbidity and mortality. Results Of a total of 123 patients, 29 patients were non-elderly and 94 patients were elderly. No significant differences were observed in sex, onset symptoms and tumor site between the two groups. Comorbidities were significantly higher in elderly patients (73.4% vs 41.4%, p<0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in surgical approach and the rate of one-stage procedures. Elderly patients were more frequently treated by Hartmann's procedure compared to non-elderly patients (20.2% vs 6.9%). Left colorectal resection with protective ileostomy was most frequent in the non-elderly group (27.6% vs 11.7%). No significant differences were found in the pT and pN categories of the TNM system between the two groups. However, a higher number of T3 in non-elderly patients was observed. A consistent number of non-oncologically adequate resections were observed in the elderly (21.3% vs 3.5%; p<0.03). The morbidity rate was significantly higher in the elderly group (31.9 % vs 3.4%, p<0.001). No significant difference was found in the mortality rate between the two groups, being 13.8% in the elderly and 6.9% in the non-elderly. Conclusions Emergency colorectal surgery for cancer still presents significant morbidity and mortality rates, especially in elderly patients. More aggressive tumors and advanced stages were more frequent in the non-elderly group and as a matter it should be taken into account when treating such patients in the emergency setting in order to perform a radical procedure as much as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Costa
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Frezza
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189 Rome, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100 Arezzo, Italy
| | - Pietro Fransvea
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Massa
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Ferri
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Mercantini
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Genoveffa Balducci
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Buondonno
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189 Rome, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Aldo Rocca
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" IRCCS, Naples, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100 Arezzo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cicardo G, Ursi P, Rossi V, Ceccarelli G, Di Matteo FM, Panarese A, D'Andrea V. The ERAS Protocol is at the forefront of the peri-operative pathway in colorectal surgery: monocentric clinical study. G Chir 2019; 40:276-289. [PMID: 32011978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colon cancer is one of the most common neoplastic diseases, with onset in old age; the benefits of the ERAS protocol were evaluated in the peri-operative treatment of patients affected by this neoplasm. METHODS We studied 90 cases of colorectal neoplasia observed at the General Surgery UOC of the San Camillo de Lellis Hospital between September 2014 and April 2016, undergoing laparoscopic surgery and to which the ERAS protocol was applied; key points were the preoperative oral feeding, the epidural anesthesia, the reduced or failed hydro-electrolytic overload, the early mobilization and recovery of the feeding, the non-use of drainage. The most important parameers considered were the reduced duration of the operating hospital stay, the lower occurrence of early and distant complications. RESULTS 85 surgical procedures were performed with laparoscopic technique (94.4%) and 5 with traditional open technique (5.6%). The conversion rate was 5.8% (5/85). 29 surgical procedures of right hemicolectomy (32.2%) and 26 of anterior resection of the rectum (28.9%) were performed; in another 29 patients (32.2%) an intervention with an open traditional technique was performed. A balanced anesthesia was performed in 41 patients (45.6%); epidural anesthesia in 32 cases (35.6%); the Tap Block in 17 subjects (18.9%). The average volume of liquid infusion was 1664cc ± 714; the average post-operative hospital stay of 4.3 ± 0.9 days. CONCLUSIONS The ERAS protocol reduces the duration of the post-operative hospitalization, involves a lower incidence of precocious and remote complications, in particular if associated with a minimally invasive surgical method; it is easily applicable and reproducible in a hospital environment, with a marked reduction in healthcare management costs.
Collapse
|
36
|
Ceccarelli G, Gusai G, Rondelli F, Balestra F, De Rosa M. Video-robotic aneurysmectomy for splenic artery aneurysm: case report and literature review. MINIM INVASIV THER 2019; 29:244-249. [PMID: 31250696 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2019.1623819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
We herein report the case of a symptomatic splenic artery aneurysm (SAA) diagnosed in a 65-year-old woman. Endoluminal exclusion was considered as first option, but the potential risk of postoperative splenic infarction, postsplenectomy thrombocytosis and immunodeficiency in an otherwise healthy patient raised the possibility to carry out a surgical procedure of vascular reconstruction using the robotic device Da Vinci® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). We performed the resection of the aneurysm and the continuity of the splenic artery was restored by end-to-end anastomosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graziano Ceccarelli
- Department of General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy
| | - Giampietro Gusai
- Department of General Surgery, San Francesco Hospital, Nuoro, Italy
| | - Fabio Rondelli
- Department of General Surgery, San Francesco Hospital, Nuoro, Italy
| | | | - Michele De Rosa
- Department of General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rocca A, Andolfi E, Zamboli AGI, Surfaro G, Tafuri D, Costa G, Frezza B, Scricciolo M, Amato M, Bianco P, Brongo S, Ceccarelli G, Giuliani A, Amato B. Management of Complications of First Instance of Hepatic Trauma in a Liver Surgery Unit: Portal Vein Ligation as a Conservative Therapeutic Strategy. Open Med (Wars) 2019; 14:376-383. [PMID: 31157303 PMCID: PMC6534101 DOI: 10.1515/med-2019-0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to the National Trauma Data Bank, the liver, after the spleen, is the first most injured organ in closed abdominal trauma. METHODS From June 2010 to December 2015 we observed in our department of Hepato-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit of the A.O.R.N. A. Cardarelli of Naples 40 patients affected by hepatic trauma. In our retrospective study, we review our experience and propose portal vein ligation (PVL) as a first - line strategy for damage control surgery (DCS) in liver trauma. RESULTS 26/40 patients (65%) which received gauze-packing represented our study group. In 10 cases out of 26 patients (38,4%) the abdominal packing was enough to control the damage. In 7 cases (18,4%) we performed a liver resection. In 7 cases, after de-packing, we adopted PVL to achieve DCS. Trans Arterial Embolization was chosen in 6 patients. 2 of them were discharged 14 days later without performing any other procedure.In 3 cases we had to perform a right epatectomy in second instance. Two hepatectomies were due to hemoperitoneum, and the other for coleperitoneum. Two patients were treated in first instance by only doing hemostasis on the bleeding site. We observed 6 patients in first instance. Five of them underwent surgery with hepatic resection and surgical hemostasis of the bleeding site. The other one underwent to conservative management. In summary we performed 15 hepatic resections, 8 of them were right hepatectomies, 1 left hepatectomy, 2 trisegmentectomies V-VI-VII. So in second instance we operated on 10 patients out of 34 (30%). CONCLUSIONS The improved knowledge of clinical physio-pathology and the improvement of diagnostic and instrumental techniques had a great impact on the prognosis of liver trauma. We think that a rigid diagnostic protocol should be applied as this allows timely pathological finding, and consists of three successive but perfectly integrated steps: 1) patient reception, in close collaboration with the resuscitator; 2) accurate but quick diagnostic framing 3) therapeutic decisional making. Selective portal vein ligation is a well-tolerated and safe manoeuvre, which could be effective, even if not definitive, in treating these subjects. That is why we believe that it can be a choice to keep in mind especially in post-depacking bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Rocca
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
- Via Sergio Pansini, 80131 Naples, Italy General Surgery Unit, Clinica Padre Pio, Mondragone (CE), Italy Department of Abdominal Oncology, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale, IRCCS, Naples, Italy
- Centre of Hepatobiliarypancreatic surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castelvolturno (CE), Italy
| | - Enrico Andolfi
- Department of Surgery, Division of general Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100Arezzo, Italy
| | | | | | - Domenico Tafuri
- Department of Sport Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costa
- Surgical and Medical Department of Traslational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Frezza
- Department of Surgery, Division of general Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100Arezzo, Italy
| | - Marta Scricciolo
- Department of Surgery, Division of general Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100Arezzo, Italy
| | - Maurizio Amato
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples. Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Bianco
- Centre of Hepatobiliarypancreatic surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castelvolturno (CE), Italy
| | - Sergio Brongo
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona University Hospital, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- Department of Surgery, Division of general Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100Arezzo, Italy
| | - Antonio Giuliani
- Department of Transplantation, Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, ‘A. Cardarelli’ Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Bruno Amato
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples. Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gurrado A, D'Ambra L, Sgaramella LI, Prete FP, Fragassi F, De Luca GM, Cavallaro G, Berti S, Falco E, Simone M, Ceccarelli G, Pezzolla A, Testini M. A Novel Technique of Digestive Anastomosis Reinforcement Using Bovine Pericardium Patch. Am Surg 2019; 85:e79-e82. [PMID: 30819311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
|
39
|
Gurrado A, D'Ambra L, Sgaramella LI, Prete FP, Fragassi F, De Luca GM, Cavallaro G, Berti S, Falco E, Simone M, Ceccarelli G, Pezzolla A, Testini M. A Novel Technique of Digestive Anastomosis Reinforcement Using Bovine Pericardium Patch. Am Surg 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481908500205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Gurrado
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology Unit of Endocrine, Digestive and Emergency Surgery University Medical School “A. Moro” of Bari Bari, Italy
| | - Luigi D'Ambra
- Department of General Surgery “Sant'Andrea” Hospital La Spezia, Italy
| | - Lucia Ilaria Sgaramella
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology Unit of Endocrine, Digestive and Emergency Surgery University Medical School “A. Moro” of Bari Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Paolo Prete
- Department of Emergency and Organs Transplantation University Medical School “A. Moro” of Bari Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Fragassi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology Unit of Endocrine, Digestive and Emergency Surgery University Medical School “A. Moro” of Bari Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Massimiliano De Luca
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology Unit of Endocrine, Digestive and Emergency Surgery University Medical School “A. Moro” of Bari Bari, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Berti
- Department of General Surgery “Sant'Andrea” Hospital La Spezia, Italy
| | - Emilio Falco
- Department of General Surgery “Sant'Andrea” Hospital La Spezia, Italy
| | - Michele Simone
- Surgical Oncology Unit Cancer Institute “Giovanni Paolo II” Bari, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- Division of General Surgery Department of Surgery Hospital of Arezzo Arezzo, Italy
| | - Angela Pezzolla
- Department of Emergency and Organs Transplantation University Medical School “A. Moro” of Bari Bari, Italy
| | - Mario Testini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology Unit of Endocrine, Digestive and Emergency Surgery University Medical School “A. Moro” of Bari Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rondelli F, De Rosa M, Stella P, Boni M, Ceccarelli G, Balzarotti R, Polistena A, Sanguinetti A, Bugiantella W, Avenia N. Perforated vs. nonperforated acute appendicitis: evaluation of short-term surgical outcomes in an elderly population. MINERVA CHIR 2018; 74:374-378. [PMID: 30306768 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4733.18.07715-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute appendicitis is a common acute surgical abdominal condition and despite the majority of cases are observed in children and young adults, its occurrence in the elderly seems to be increasing, with a higher risk of perforation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes following appendectomy for acute appendicitis in the elderly, making a comparison between perforated and nonperforated groups regarding operative time, hospital stay and postoperative complications. METHODS The medical records of 48 patients over the age of 60 years who had a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of acute appendicitis from January 2011 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into those with perforated and those with non-perforated appendicitis (NPA) and a comparison was made between both groups regarding demography, operative time, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications. RESULTS From 48 patients over 60 years diagnosed with acute appendicitis, a PA was removed from 10 patients (20.8%). The PA group consisted of 3 males and 7 females, and their mean age was 71.6 years (range 65-84). The NPA group included 22 males and 16 females, and their mean age was 76.5 years (range 63-96). The mean operative time was 58±18.7 minutes and 43.3±9.9 minutes in the perforated and nonperforated groups respectively, with statistically significant difference (P=0.0013). The mean length of hospital stay was similar in the PA group and in the NPA group, being 6.5±1.8 days and 5.4±1.8 days respectively, but these differences were not statistically significant (P=0.093). The frequency of postoperative complications was similar in both groups as they were observed in 3 patients (30%) of the PA group and 10 patients (26%) of the NPA group (P=0.2488). No postoperative intraabdominal abscess was observed in both groups and there was no death after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS PA, despite requiring a longer mean operative time, in our series is not producing a longer hospital stay or more postoperative complications compared to NPA. The non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis is a reasonable option in frail patients in order to avoid the burden of morbidity related to operation, nevertheless surgery remains the standard of care in all age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Rondelli
- Department of General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Perugia, Italy.,Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Michele De Rosa
- Department of General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Perugia, Italy -
| | - Paolo Stella
- Department of General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Marcello Boni
- Department of General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- Unit of Minimally Invasive and General Surgery, Department of Medicine and General Surgery, "San Donato" Hospital, ASL 8 Arezzo, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Ruben Balzarotti
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Civico Hospital, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Polistena
- Unit of Endocrine Surgery, Medical School, S. Maria University Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sanguinetti
- Unit of Endocrine Surgery, Medical School, S. Maria University Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Walter Bugiantella
- Department of General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Nicola Avenia
- Unit of Endocrine Surgery, Medical School, S. Maria University Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ciccozzi M, Riva E, Vita S, Cella E, Fogolari M, Spoto S, Lopalco M, Ceccarelli G, Angeletti S. An acute febrile outbreak in a refugee community of an Italian asylum seeker center: lessons learned. Public Health 2018; 163:16-19. [PMID: 30031836 PMCID: PMC7111893 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2018] [Revised: 05/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The management of infectious outbreaks in closed settings represents an important public health issue. An outbreak of acute febrile syndrome affecting 22 refugees resident at the Asylum Seekers Centre of Castelnuovo di Porto in Rome has been reported, and the preventive and control measures adopted have been described as an example of public health safety. METHODS Pharyngeal swab and whole-blood samples were collected from 22 cases observed and analyzed for standard bacterial cultures and respiratory and herpesviruses by qualitative CLART PneumoVir2 and Entherpex microarray. RESULTS A possible respiratory-transmitted etiology and a concomitant reactivation of multiple herpesviruses have been evidenced. The epidemiological investigation showed that the spread of the epidemic was promoted because patients were hosted in neighboring rooms or in the same room, facilitating the rapid spread of infectious disease. CONCLUSIONS The potential way of transmission was supposed, and preventive measures for infection control were adopted. The measures adopted are an example of best practice for outbreak management, and the microbiological surveillance is recommended for public health improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ciccozzi
- Unit of Medical Statistics and Molecular Epidemiology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Italy
| | - E Riva
- Unit of Virology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Italy
| | - S Vita
- Migrant and Global Health Research Organisation, Centro di Ricerca Sulla Salute Globale e Delle Popolazioni Mobili (Mi-Hero), Italy
| | - E Cella
- Unit of Medical Statistics and Molecular Epidemiology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Italy
| | - M Fogolari
- Unit of Clinical Laboratory Science, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Italy
| | - S Spoto
- Internal Medicine Department, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Italy
| | - M Lopalco
- Sanitary Bureau of Asylum Seekers Center of Castelnuovo di Porto, Rome, Italy; Auxilium Società Cooperativa Sociale, Senise (PZ), Italy
| | - G Ceccarelli
- Migrant and Global Health Research Organisation, Centro di Ricerca Sulla Salute Globale e Delle Popolazioni Mobili (Mi-Hero), Italy; Sanitary Bureau of Asylum Seekers Center of Castelnuovo di Porto, Rome, Italy; Auxilium Società Cooperativa Sociale, Senise (PZ), Italy; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University of Rome Sapienza, Italy
| | - S Angeletti
- Unit of Clinical Laboratory Science, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Marano L, Rondelli F, Bartoli A, Testini M, Castagnoli G, Ceccarelli G. Oncologic Effectiveness and Safety of Splenectomy in Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Carcinoma: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anticancer Res 2018; 38:3609-3617. [PMID: 29848717 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 04/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The role of splenectomy as an essential component of radical surgery for proximal gastric cancer, from an oncological point of view, is still debated, and no consistent recommendations have been proposed. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to provide a more robust answer regarding the oncological effectiveness and safety of splenectomy in total gastrectomy for proximal gastric carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was planned and performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention. Patients with a histological diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma located in the upper third of the stomach who underwent D2 total gastrectomy with or without splenectomy were selected. The primary outcome was to analyze the influence of splenectomy on the overall survival of patients. Additionally, the mean difference in procedure time, length of hospital stay, number of retrieved lymph nodes, as well as the odds ratio of postoperative complications comparing splenectomy to spleen preservation were investigated in a secondary analysis Results: Overall, four studies with a total of 978 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis showed no difference in overall survival rates between those who underwent spleen preservation compared to the splenectomy-treated group (risk ratio=0.92, 95% confidence interval=0.79 to 1.06, p=0.277). Interestingly, all studies reporting overall morbidity data highlighted statistically significant differences in favor of spleen-preservation group (odds ratio=2.11, 95% confidence interval=1.44 to 3.09, p<0.001). CONCLUSION In total, gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer, splenectomy should not be recommended as it increases operative morbidity without improving survival when compared to spleen preservation. Furthermore, our results may help in planning the updated versions of Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines. This meta-analysis, however, points to the urgent need for high-quality, well-designed, large-scale, clinical trials, with short-as well as long-term evaluation comparing splenectomy with spleen-preserving procedures, in a controlled randomized manner to help future research and to establish an evidence-based approach to gastric cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Marano
- General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Matteo degli Infermi Hospital- AUSL Umbria 2, Spoleto, Italy
| | - Fabio Rondelli
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.,General Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital-AUSL Umbria 2, Foligno, Italy
| | - Alberto Bartoli
- General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Matteo degli Infermi Hospital- AUSL Umbria 2, Spoleto, Italy
| | - Mario Testini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Unit of Endocrine, Digestive and Emergency Surgery, A. Moro University Medical School of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Castagnoli
- General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Matteo degli Infermi Hospital- AUSL Umbria 2, Spoleto, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery, Department of Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital-AUSL Umbria 2, Foligno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Caruso S, Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Coratti A. Minimally invasive liver resection: has the time come to consider robotics a valid assistance? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2018; 7:195-198. [PMID: 30046572 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2018.02.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Caruso
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, Unit of General Surgery, "Santa Maria Annunziata" Hospital, Local Health Unit Center Tuscany Company, Florence, Italy
| | - Alberto Patriti
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Hospitals of Pesaro and Fano, "Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord" Hospital Company, Marche, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- Department of Medicine and General Surgery, Unit of Minimally Invasive and General Surgery, Local Health Unit South-East Tuscany Company, "San Donato" Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, "Careggi" University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ceccarelli G, Andolfi E, Fontani A, Calise F, Rocca A, Giuliani A. Robot-assisted liver surgery in a general surgery unit with a "Referral Centre Hub&Spoke Learning Program". Early outcomes after our first 70 consecutive patients. MINERVA CHIR 2018; 73:460-468. [PMID: 29795060 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4733.18.07651-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, feasibility and short-term outcomes of our first 70 consecutive patients treated by robotic-assisted liver resection after a reversal proctoring between a high HPB volume centre and our well-trained center in minimally invasive General Surgery. Six surgeons were involved in this Hub&Spoke learning program. METHODS From September 2012 to December 2016, 70 patients underwent robotic-assisted liver resections (RALR). We treated 18 patients affected by colorectal and gastric cancer with synchronous liver lesions suspected for metastases in a one-stage robotic-assisted procedure. For the first 20 procedures we had a tutor in the operatory room, who was present also in the next most difficult procedures. RESULTS The 30- and 90-day mortality rate was zero with an overall morbidity rate of 10.1%. Associated surgical procedures were performed in about 65,7% of patients. The observed conversion rate was 10%. The results of the first 20 cases were similar to the next 50 showing a shortned learning curve. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive robot-assisted liver resection is a safe technique; it allows overcoming many limits of conventional laparoscopy. This innovative, time-enduring Hub&Spoke may allow patients to undergo a proper standard of care also for complex surgical procedures, without the need of reaching referral centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graziano Ceccarelli
- Unit of General and Robotic Surgery, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy.,Unit of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, P.O. Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Health's Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.,Department of General and Robotic Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Enrico Andolfi
- Unit of General and Robotic Surgery, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Andrea Fontani
- Unit of General and Robotic Surgery, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Fulvio Calise
- Department of Medicine and Health's Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Aldo Rocca
- Unit of General and Robotic Surgery, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy - .,Unit of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, P.O. Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Health's Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.,Department of Colorectal Cancer Surgery, G. Pascale Foundation and Institute for Research and Care, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Giuliani
- Department of Medicine and Health's Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
De Rosa M, Rondelli F, Stella P, Boni M, Ermili F, Ceccarelli G. Triple synchronous colorectal carcinoma. ANZ J Surg 2018; 89:E329-E330. [PMID: 29510452 DOI: 10.1111/ans.14452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michele De Rosa
- Department of General Surgery, 'San Giovanni Battista' Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Fabio Rondelli
- Department of General Surgery, 'San Giovanni Battista' Hospital, Perugia, Italy.,Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Paolo Stella
- Department of General Surgery, 'San Giovanni Battista' Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Marcello Boni
- Department of General Surgery, 'San Giovanni Battista' Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Fabio Ermili
- Department of General Surgery, 'San Giovanni Battista' Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- Department of General Surgery, 'San Giovanni Battista' Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rondelli F, Santinelli R, Stella P, Bugiantella W, Ceccarelli G, Balzarotti RC, De Rosa M, Avenia N. A New Surgical Device for Anterograde Intraoperative Rectal Washout. Surg Innov 2018; 25:203-207. [PMID: 29473452 DOI: 10.1177/1553350618759767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is the fourth most diffuse cause of death in the world and local recurrence is associated with a reduced long-term life expectancy, with a reduced quality of life. Rectal washout at the anastomosis site leads to a statistically significant reduction of local recurrences. METHODS We developed the idea of a new laparoscopic stapler with an integrated washout system that could decontaminate the rectal stump before resection, without the need to enlarge the standard surgical incision or even to distort the incision site, closing the rectal stump just below the inferior part of the cancer, and then proceeding with the resection and stapling of the distal part of the tumor. Combined with these canonical functionalities, the new device, equipped with a patented washout system (patent number EP 3103401A1) will also allow to inject in the closed bowel a physiologic saline liquid. RESULTS In force of the mechanical action of the liquid injected, carcinogenic exfoliated cells eventually floating in the affected region of the colonic lumen will be expelled through the anal orifice. The intraoperative rectal washout, both in minimally invasive and in traditional open surgery, thus becomes a simple, effective, and reproducible procedure. CONCLUSIONS We describe the technical features and the possible clinical applications of a potentially new surgical laparoscopic stapler coupled with an integrated irrigation system. We have patented the system and we are developing a prototype with the aim to start an experimental pilot study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Rondelli
- 1 "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, Perugia, Italy.,2 University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Stella
- 1 "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Nicola Avenia
- 2 University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.,6 S. Maria University Hospital, Terni, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Rondelli F, Franco L, Balzarotti Canger RC, Ceccarelli G, Becattini C, Bugiantella W. Purse-string closure versus conventional primary closure of wound following stoma reversal: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 2018; 52:208-213. [PMID: 29474885 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2018] [Revised: 02/03/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent complications after stoma closure and the optimal skin closure technique is still not clear. The goal of this review was to compare outcomes with purse-string closure technique (PSC) versus conventional closure technique (CCT) for skin closure after stoma reversal. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare SSI rate within 30 days, operative time, hospital stay, incisional hernia and intestinal obstruction rates between PSC and CCT. RESULTS The pooled analysis of 5 studies showed a statically significant lower rate of SSI in favor of PSC compared to CCT (OR -0.24; 95% CI -0.32, - 0.15; p < 0.00001). No statistically significant differences were observed in the operative time (OR -0.05; 95% CI -3.95, 3.84; p = 0.98) and in the length of hospital stay (OR -0.20; 95% CI -0.76, 0.36; p = 0.48), between the two techniques. Additionally, two out of the five studies provided data on incisional hernia and intestinal obstruction and the pooled analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between PSC and CCT techniques: incisional hernia (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.27-2.47; p = 0.71) and intestinal obstruction (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.41-2.84; p = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS The analysis of 5 RCTs showed that SSI rate is statistically significant lower when PSC is performed, compared to CCT. Whereas, no significant differences were found between the two techniques with regards to operative time, length of hospital stay, incisional hernia and intestinal obstruction rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Rondelli
- General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria2, Foligno, Italy; Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Laura Franco
- Internal Vascular and Emergency Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | | | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria2, Foligno, Italy.
| | - Cecilia Becattini
- Internal Vascular and Emergency Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Walter Bugiantella
- General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista" Hospital, USL Umbria2, Foligno, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Minimally invasive surgery has gained wide acceptance in many institutions. Complex surgery such as pancreatic resections delayed its diffusion due to high rate postoperative complications and technical aspects, while for pancreaticoduodenctomy the role of a minimally invasive approach is still on debate. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy may be considered a safe procedure and a valid alternative in selected cases. The operating time, learning curve and the costs represent major drawbacks for the laparoscopic approach. Elderly patients (>70 years of age) are generally considered to be at higher risk for developing complications after pancreatic surgery due to compromised physiological reserve and presence of multiple comorbidities. Our aim was to make a review about the role of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) in the elderly population. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic search of the scientific literature was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, online journals, and the Internet for all publications on LDP and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) in old age patients. All selected articles were reviewed and analyzed. We found 393 abstract that were reviewed. We considered all type of publications. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Laparoscopic pancreatic resections are considered more difficult due to the retroperitoneal organ location and by the presence of surrounding large vessels and other crucial structures. Therefore, an adequate learning curve is needed. Beyond these remarks, in many institutions, LDP is a standard approach in patients with lesions in the body and tail of the pancreas. The most evident advantage of LDP is the shorter length of stay. Age alone should not be considered as an absolute contraindication for LDP. Obviously, it is still too early to assess oncological outcomes, but the R0 resection rate, the number of harvested lymph nodes, and the overall survival rate are superimposable to ODP. CONCLUSIONS LDP is safe and feasible if compared to ODP in selected elderly patients with body and tail pancreatic tumors. Less blood loss and shorter hospital stay are the most evident advantages of minimally invasive approach. Randomized controlled trials and high-volume centers prospective studies with long-term outcomes are necessary to consider laparoscopy a standard of care. Minimally invasive robotic surgery may represent an interesting alternative to laparoscopy especially for spleen-preserving procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Giuliani
- V. Tiberio Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General and Robotic Surgery Unit, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Aldo Rocca
- V. Tiberio Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy - .,General and Robotic Surgery Unit, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy.,Colorectal Cancer Surgery Unit, G. Pascale Foundation and Institute for Research and Care in Oncologic Surgery, Naples, Italy.,Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Marchetti C, Serra MC, Lopalco M, Vita S, Galliano E, Trani F, Ceccarelli G, Sgricia S, Quintavalle G, Sinopoli MT. Handle a chickenpox outbreak in an Accommodation Centre for Asylum Seeker (CARA) in the ASL Roma 4. Eur J Public Health 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx189.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
50
|
Sargentini V, Collepardo D, D Alessandro M, Petralito G, Ceccarelli G, Alessandri F, Piciocchi A, Angeloni A, Venditti M, Bachetoni A. Role of biomarkers in adult sepsis and their application for a good laboratory practice: a pilot study. J BIOL REG HOMEOS AG 2017; 31:1147-1154. [PMID: 29254328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
This study measured Procalcitonin (PCT), Presepsin (PRE-S) and pro-Adrenomedullin (pro-ADM) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients blood to assess their contribution to accurate diagnosis of sepsis and potential predictive impact on prognosis. The final aim was to improve the use of infection biomarkers for optimizing the impact of laboratory medicine on clinical outcomes, focusing on the good management of resources designed to produce maximum effectiveness and efficiency. Sixty-four adult patients were studied during their hospitalization in ICU; blood samples were collected and categorized according to their clinical diagnosis and illness severity, and sepsis marker levels were measured on automated immunoassay platforms. PCT, PRE-S and pro-ADM infection markers were significantly lower in controls than in sepsis or septic shock groups. The area under the curve, by ROC curve analysis, was 0.945 for PCT, 0.756 for PRE-S and 0.741 for pro-ADM. Sepsis diagnostic accuracy was not improved by combining PCT, PRE-S and pro-ADM measures. Preliminary data demonstrated that, despite PRE-S and pro-ADM being able to differentiate between septic and non-septic patients with accuracy, PCT remains the most reliable marker available. The results obtained still do not allow us to consider a combination of markers, because it would merely increase laboratory costs without improving diagnostic performance. Furthermore, the results confirm a possible prognostic role of pro-ADM in septic states, but no correlation between biomarker levels and survival at 48 h was detected. Hence PCT, PRE-S, nor pro-ADM can be used to predict short-term prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Sargentini
- Clinical Pathology, Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - D Collepardo
- Clinical Pathology, Department of Surgery, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - M D Alessandro
- Clinical Pathology, Department of Surgery, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - G Petralito
- Clinical Pathology, Department of Surgery, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - G Ceccarelli
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - F Alessandri
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - A Piciocchi
- Department of Statistical Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - A Angeloni
- Clinical Pathology, Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - M Venditti
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - A Bachetoni
- Clinical Pathology, Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|