1
|
Catarci M, Guadagni S, Masedu F, Ruffo G, Viola MG, Borghi F, Garulli G, Pirozzi F, Delrio P, De Luca R, Baldazzi G, Scatizzi M. Bowel preparation for elective colorectal resection: multi-treatment machine learning analysis on 6241 cases from a prospective Italian cohort. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:53. [PMID: 38625550 PMCID: PMC11021318 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04627-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current evidence concerning bowel preparation before elective colorectal surgery is still controversial. This study aimed to compare the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL), surgical site infections (SSIs), and overall morbidity (any adverse event, OM) after elective colorectal surgery using four different types of bowel preparation. METHODS A prospective database gathered among 78 Italian surgical centers in two prospective studies, including 6241 patients who underwent elective colorectal resection with anastomosis for malignant or benign disease, was re-analyzed through a multi-treatment machine-learning model considering no bowel preparation (NBP; No. = 3742; 60.0%) as the reference treatment arm, compared to oral antibiotics alone (oA; No. = 406; 6.5%), mechanical bowel preparation alone (MBP; No. = 1486; 23.8%), or in combination with oAB (MoABP; No. = 607; 9.7%). Twenty covariates related to biometric data, surgical procedures, perioperative management, and hospital/center data potentially affecting outcomes were included and balanced into the model. The primary endpoints were AL, SSIs, and OM. All the results were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS Compared to NBP, MBP showed significantly higher AL risk (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.23-2.71; p = .003) and OM risk (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.10-1.72; p = .005), no significant differences for all the endpoints were recorded in the oA group, whereas MoABP showed a significantly reduced SSI risk (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.25-0.79; p = .008). CONCLUSIONS MoABP significantly reduced the SSI risk after elective colorectal surgery, therefore representing a valid alternative to NBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Guadagni
- General Surgery Unit, Università degli Studi dell'Aquila, Via Vetoio, snc, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
| | - Francesco Masedu
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, VR, Italy
| | | | - Felice Borghi
- Oncologic Surgery Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | | | - Felice Pirozzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASL Napoli2 , Nord, Pozzuoli, NA, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS-Italia", Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele De Luca
- Department of Surgical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | | | - Marco Scatizzi
- General Surgery Unit, Serristori Hospital, Santa Maria Annunziata &, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Catarci M, Guadagni S, Masedu F, Sartelli M, Montemurro LA, Baiocchi GL, Tebala GD, Borghi F, Marini P, Scatizzi M, The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage iCral Study Group. Oral Antibiotics Alone versus Oral Antibiotics Combined with Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matching Re-Analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 Prospective Cohorts. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:235. [PMID: 38534670 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13030235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The evidence regarding the role of oral antibiotics alone (oA) or combined with mechanical bowel preparation (MoABP) for elective colorectal surgery remains controversial. A prospective database of 8359 colorectal resections gathered over a 32-month period from 78 Italian surgical units (the iCral 2 and 3 studies), reporting patient-, disease-, and procedure-related variables together with 60-day adverse events, was re-analyzed to identify a subgroup of 1013 cases (12.1%) that received either oA or MoABP. This dataset was analyzed using a 1:1 propensity score-matching model including 20 covariates. Two well-balanced groups of 243 patients each were obtained: group A (oA) and group B (MoABP). The primary endpoints were anastomotic leakage (AL) and surgical site infection (SSI) rates. Group A vs. group B showed a significantly higher AL risk [14 (5.8%) vs. 6 (2.5%) events; OR: 3.77; 95%CI: 1.22-11.67; p = 0.021], while no significant difference was recorded between the two groups regarding SSIs. These results strongly support the use of MoABP for elective colorectal resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, 00157 Roma, Italy
| | - Stefano Guadagni
- General Surgery Unit, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesco Masedu
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Massimo Sartelli
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Lucia Hospital, 62100 Macerata, Italy
| | | | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- General Surgical Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia at the Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST), 26100 Cremona, Italy
| | | | - Felice Borghi
- Oncologic Surgery Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Marini
- General & Emergency Surgery Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, 00152 Roma, Italy
| | - Marco Scatizzi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata & Serristori Hospital, 50012 Firenze, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Labricciosa FM, Al Omari AH, Bains L, Baraket O, Catarci M, Cui Y, Ferreres AR, Gkiokas G, Gomes CA, Hodonou AM, Isik A, Litvin A, Lohsiriwat V, Kotecha V, Khokha V, Kryvoruchko IA, Machain GM, O’Connor DB, Olaoye I, Al-Omari JAK, Pasculli A, Petrone P, Rickard J, Sall I, Sawyer RG, Téllez-Almenares O, Catena F, Siquini W. Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis: A Proposal for a Global Evidence-Based Bundle. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:100. [PMID: 38275329 PMCID: PMC10812782 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13010100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
In the multimodal strategy context, to implement healthcare-associated infection prevention, bundles are one of the most commonly used methods to adapt guidelines in the local context and transfer best practices into routine clinical care. One of the most important measures to prevent surgical site infections is surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP). This narrative review aims to present a bundle for the correct SAP administration and evaluate the evidence supporting it. Surgical site infection (SSI) prevention guidelines published by the WHO, CDC, NICE, and SHEA/IDSA/APIC/AHA, and the clinical practice guidelines for SAP by ASHP/IDSA/SIS/SHEA, were reviewed. Subsequently, comprehensive searches were also conducted using the PubMed®/MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases, in order to identify further supporting evidence-based documentation. The bundle includes five different measures that may affect proper SAP administration. The measures included may be easily implemented in all hospitals worldwide and are based on minimal drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics knowledge, which all surgeons should know. Antibiotics for SAP should be prescribed for surgical procedures at high risk for SSIs, such as clean-contaminated and contaminated surgical procedures or for clean surgical procedures where SSIs, even if unlikely, may have devastating consequences, such as in procedures with prosthetic implants. SAP should generally be administered within 60 min before the surgical incision for most antibiotics (including cefazolin). SAP redosing is indicated for surgical procedures exceeding two antibiotic half-lives or for procedures significantly associated with blood loss. In principle, SAP should be discontinued after the surgical procedure. Hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship programmes can optimise the treatment of infections and reduce adverse events associated with antibiotics. In the context of a collaborative and interdisciplinary approach, it is essential to encourage an institutional safety culture in which surgeons are persuaded, rather than compelled, to respect antibiotic prescribing practices. In that context, the proposed bundle contains a set of evidence-based interventions for SAP administration. It is easy to apply, promotes collaboration, and includes measures that can be adequately followed and evaluated in all hospitals worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Sartelli
- Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, 62100 Macerata, Italy;
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit, Pisa University Hospital, 56124 Pisa, Italy;
| | | | - AbdelKarim. H. Al Omari
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan;
| | - Lovenish Bains
- Department of General Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi 110002, India;
| | - Oussama Baraket
- Department of General Surgery, Bizerte Hospital, Bizerte 7000, Tunisia;
| | - Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, 00157 Rome, Italy;
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- Department of Surgery, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Nankai Clinical School of Medicine, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China;
| | - Alberto R. Ferreres
- Department of Surgery, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires 1428, Argentina;
| | - George Gkiokas
- Department of Surgery, Medical School, “Aretaieio” Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece;
| | - Carlos Augusto Gomes
- Department of Surgery, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora, Hospital Universitário Terezinha de Jesus, Juiz de Fora 25520, Brazil;
| | - Adrien M. Hodonou
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Parakou, Parakou 03 BP 10, Benin;
| | - Arda Isik
- Department of Surgery, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul 34000, Turkey;
| | - Andrey Litvin
- Department of Surgical Diseases No. 3, Gomel State Medical University, 246000 Gomel, Belarus;
| | - Varut Lohsiriwat
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand;
| | - Vihar Kotecha
- Department of General Surgery, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza P.O. Box 1464, Tanzania;
| | - Vladimir Khokha
- General Surgery Unit, Podhalanski Specialized Hospital, 34-400 Nowy Targ, Poland;
| | - Igor A. Kryvoruchko
- Department of Surgery No. 2, Kharkiv National Medical University, 61000 Kharkiv, Ukraine;
| | - Gustavo M. Machain
- Department of Surgery, Universidad Nacional de Asuncion, San Lorenzo 1055, Paraguay;
| | - Donal B. O’Connor
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Trinity College, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland;
| | - Iyiade Olaoye
- Department of Surgery, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin 240101, Nigeria;
| | - Jamal A. K. Al-Omari
- Medical College, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Hussein Hospital, Zarqa 13313, Jordan;
| | - Alessandro Pasculli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), Unit of Academic General Surgery “V. Bonomo”, University of Bari “A. Moro”, 70125 Bari, Italy;
| | - Patrizio Petrone
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, NYU Langone Hospital—Long Island, Mineola, NY 11501, USA;
| | - Jennifer Rickard
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA;
| | - Ibrahima Sall
- Department of General Surgery, Military Teaching Hospital, Dakar 3006, Senegal;
| | - Robert G. Sawyer
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA;
| | - Orlando Téllez-Almenares
- General Surgery Department of Saturnino Lora Provincial Hospital, University of Medical Sciences of Santiago de Cuba,
26P2+J7X, Santiago de Cuba 90100, Cuba;
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Surgery, “Bufalini” Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy;
| | - Walter Siquini
- Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, 62100 Macerata, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guadagni S, Catarci M, Masedu F, Karim ME, Clementi M, Ruffo G, Viola MG, Borghi F, Baldazzi G, Scatizzi M, Pirozzi F, Delrio P, Garulli G, Marini P, Campagnacci R, De Luca R, Ficari F, Sica G, Scabini S, Liverani A, Caricato M, Patriti A. Abdominal drainage after elective colorectal surgery: propensity score-matched retrospective analysis of an Italian cohort. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrad107. [PMID: 38170895 PMCID: PMC10763998 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Italy, surgeons continue to drain the abdominal cavity in more than 50 per cent of patients after colorectal resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of abdominal drain placement on early adverse events in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. METHODS A database was retrospectively analysed through a 1:1 propensity score-matching model including 21 covariates. The primary endpoint was the postoperative duration of stay, and the secondary endpoints were surgical site infections, infectious morbidity rate defined as surgical site infections plus pulmonary infections plus urinary infections, anastomotic leakage, overall morbidity rate, major morbidity rate, reoperation and mortality rates. The results of multiple logistic regression analyses were presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95 per cent c.i. RESULTS A total of 6157 patients were analysed to produce two well-balanced groups of 1802 patients: group (A), no abdominal drain(s) and group (B), abdominal drain(s). Group A versus group B showed a significantly lower risk of postoperative duration of stay >6 days (OR 0.60; 95 per cent c.i. 0.51-0.70; P < 0.001). A mean postoperative duration of stay difference of 0.86 days was detected between groups. No difference was recorded between the two groups for all the other endpoints. CONCLUSION This study confirms that placement of abdominal drain(s) after elective colorectal surgery is associated with a non-clinically significant longer (0.86 days) postoperative duration of stay but has no impact on any other secondary outcomes, confirming that abdominal drains should not be used routinely in colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Roma, Italy
- General Surgery Unit, ‘C.&G. Mazzoni’ Hospital, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Francesco Masedu
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Mohammad Ehsanul Karim
- School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St.Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Marco Clementi
- General Surgery Unit, University of L’Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella (VR), Italy
| | | | - Felice Borghi
- Oncologic Surgery Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Gianandrea Baldazzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano, Italy
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Nord Milano, Sesto San Giovanni, Italy
| | - Marco Scatizzi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata & Serristori Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | - Felice Pirozzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Pozzuoli, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, ‘Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS-Italia’, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Pierluigi Marini
- General & Emergency Surgery Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Raffaele De Luca
- Department of Surgical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Tumori ‘Giovanni Paolo II’, Bari, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Ficari
- General Surgery and IBD Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sica
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata University Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefano Scabini
- General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, IRCCS ‘San Martino’ National Cancer Center, Genova, Italy
| | - Andrea Liverani
- General Surgery Unit, Regina Apostolorum Hospital, Albano Laziale, Italy
| | - Marco Caricato
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Policlinico Campus BioMedico, Roma, Italy
| | - Alberto Patriti
- Department of Surgery, Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro e Fano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Catarci M, Guadagni S, Masedu F, Ruffo G, Viola MG, Borghi F, Baldazzi G, Pirozzi F, Delrio P, Garulli G, Marini P, Patriti A, Campagnacci R, Sica G, Caricato M, Montemurro LA, Ciano P, Benedetti M, Guercioni G, Scatizzi M. Mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis of the Italian colorectal anastomotic leakage (iCral) study group prospective cohorts. Updates Surg 2024; 76:107-117. [PMID: 37851299 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01670-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
Retrospective evaluation of the effects of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) on data derived from two prospective open-label observational multicenter studies in Italy regarding elective colorectal surgery. MBP for elective colorectal surgery remains a controversial issue with contrasting recommendations in current guidelines. The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group, therefore, decided to estimate the effects of no MBP (treatment variable) versus MBP for elective colorectal surgery. A total of 8359 patients who underwent colorectal resection with anastomosis were enrolled in two consecutive prospective studies in 78 surgical centers in Italy from January 2019 to September 2021. A retrospective PSMA was performed on 5455 (65.3%) cases after the application of explicit exclusion criteria to eliminate confounders. The primary endpoints were anastomotic leakage (AL) and surgical site infections (SSI) rates; the secondary endpoints included SSI subgroups, overall and major morbidity, reoperation, and mortality rates. Overall length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS) was also considered. Two well-balanced groups of 1125 patients each were generated: group A (No MBP, true population of interest), and group B (MBP, control population), performing a PSMA considering 21 covariates. Group A vs. group B resulted significantly associated with a lower risk of AL [42 (3.5%) vs. 73 (6.0%) events; OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38-0.84; p = 0.005]. No difference was recorded between the two groups for SSI [73 (6.0%) vs. 85 (7.0%) events; OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.63-1.22; p = 0.441]. Regarding the secondary endpoints, no MBP resulted significantly associated with a lower risk of reoperation and LOS > 6 days. This study confirms that no MBP before elective colorectal surgery is significantly associated with a lower risk of AL, reoperation rate, and LOS < 6 days when compared with MBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Rome 2, Via Dei Monti Tiburtini, 385, 00157, Rome, Italy.
- General Surgery Unit, "C.&G. Mazzoni" Hospital, Ascoli Piceno, Italy.
| | | | - Francesco Masedu
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, VR, Italy
| | | | - Felice Borghi
- Oncologic Surgery Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
- General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Gianandrea Baldazzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano, MI, Italy
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Nord Milano, Sesto San Giovanni, MI, Italy
| | - Felice Pirozzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Pozzuoli, NA, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Per Lo Studio E La Cura Dei Tumori, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS", Naples, Italy
| | | | - Pierluigi Marini
- General and Emergency Surgery Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Patriti
- Department of Surgery, Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro e Fano, PU, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Sica
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Caricato
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Policlinico Campus BioMedico, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Ciano
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Rome 2, Via Dei Monti Tiburtini, 385, 00157, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Benedetti
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Rome 2, Via Dei Monti Tiburtini, 385, 00157, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marco Scatizzi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata & Serristori Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sartelli M, Barie PS, Coccolini F, Abbas M, Abbo LM, Abdukhalilova GK, Abraham Y, Abubakar S, Abu-Zidan FM, Adebisi YA, Adamou H, Afandiyeva G, Agastra E, Alfouzan WA, Al-Hasan MN, Ali S, Ali SM, Allaw F, Allwell-Brown G, Amir A, Amponsah OKO, Al Omari A, Ansaloni L, Ansari S, Arauz AB, Augustin G, Awazi B, Azfar M, Bah MSB, Bala M, Banagala ASK, Baral S, Bassetti M, Bavestrello L, Beilman G, Bekele K, Benboubker M, Beović B, Bergamasco MD, Bertagnolio S, Biffl WL, Blot S, Boermeester MA, Bonomo RA, Brink A, Brusaferro S, Butemba J, Caínzos MA, Camacho-Ortiz A, Canton R, Cascio A, Cassini A, Cástro-Sanchez E, Catarci M, Catena R, Chamani-Tabriz L, Chandy SJ, Charani E, Cheadle WG, Chebet D, Chikowe I, Chiara F, Cheng VCC, Chioti A, Cocuz ME, Coimbra R, Cortese F, Cui Y, Czepiel J, Dasic M, de Francisco Serpa N, de Jonge SW, Delibegovic S, Dellinger EP, Demetrashvili Z, De Palma A, De Silva D, De Simone B, De Waele J, Dhingra S, Diaz JJ, Dima C, Dirani N, Dodoo CC, Dorj G, Duane TM, Eckmann C, Egyir B, Elmangory MM, Enani MA, Ergonul O, Escalera-Antezana JP, Escandon K, Ettu AWOO, Fadare JO, Fantoni M, Farahbakhsh M, Faro MP, Ferreres A, Flocco G, Foianini E, Fry DE, Garcia AF, Gerardi C, Ghannam W, Giamarellou H, Glushkova N, Gkiokas G, Goff DA, Gomi H, Gottfredsson M, Griffiths EA, Guerra Gronerth RI, Guirao X, Gupta YK, Halle-Ekane G, Hansen S, Haque M, Hardcastle TC, Hayman DTS, Hecker A, Hell M, Ho VP, Hodonou AM, Isik A, Islam S, Itani KMF, Jaidane N, Jammer I, Jenkins DR, Kamara IF, Kanj SS, Jumbam D, Keikha M, Khanna AK, Khanna S, Kapoor G, Kapoor G, Kariuki S, Khamis F, Khokha V, Kiggundu R, Kiguba R, Kim HB, Kim PK, Kirkpatrick AW, Kluger Y, Ko WC, Kok KYY, Kotecha V, Kouma I, Kovacevic B, Krasniqi J, Krutova M, Kryvoruchko I, Kullar R, Labi KA, Labricciosa FM, Lakoh S, Lakatos B, Lansang MAD, Laxminarayan R, Lee YR, Leone M, Leppaniemi A, Hara GL, Litvin A, Lohsiriwat V, Machain GM, Mahomoodally F, Maier RV, Majumder MAA, Malama S, Manasa J, Manchanda V, Manzano-Nunez R, Martínez-Martínez L, Martin-Loeches I, Marwah S, Maseda E, Mathewos M, Maves RC, McNamara D, Memish Z, Mertz D, Mishra SK, Montravers P, Moro ML, Mossialos E, Motta F, Mudenda S, Mugabi P, Mugisha MJM, Mylonakis E, Napolitano LM, Nathwani D, Nkamba L, Nsutebu EF, O’Connor DB, Ogunsola S, Jensen PØ, Ordoñez JM, Ordoñez CA, Ottolino P, Ouedraogo AS, Paiva JA, Palmieri M, Pan A, Pant N, Panyko A, Paolillo C, Patel J, Pea F, Petrone P, Petrosillo N, Pintar T, Plaudis H, Podda M, Ponce-de-Leon A, Powell SL, Puello-Guerrero A, Pulcini C, Rasa K, Regimbeau JM, Rello J, Retamozo-Palacios MR, Reynolds-Campbell G, Ribeiro J, Rickard J, Rocha-Pereira N, Rosenthal VD, Rossolini GM, Rwegerera GM, Rwigamba M, Sabbatucci M, Saladžinskas Ž, Salama RE, Sali T, Salile SS, Sall I, Kafil HS, Sakakushev BE, Sawyer RG, Scatizzi M, Seni J, Septimus EJ, Sganga G, Shabanzadeh DM, Shelat VG, Shibabaw A, Somville F, Souf S, Stefani S, Tacconelli E, Tan BK, Tattevin P, Rodriguez-Taveras C, Telles JP, Téllez-Almenares O, Tessier J, Thang NT, Timmermann C, Timsit JF, Tochie JN, Tolonen M, Trueba G, Tsioutis C, Tumietto F, Tuon FF, Ulrych J, Uranues S, van Dongen M, van Goor H, Velmahos GC, Vereczkei A, Viaggi B, Viale P, Vila J, Voss A, Vraneš J, Watkins RR, Wanjiru-Korir N, Waworuntu O, Wechsler-Fördös A, Yadgarova K, Yahaya M, Yahya AI, Xiao Y, Zakaria AD, Zakrison TL, Zamora Mesia V, Siquini W, Darzi A, Pagani L, Catena F. Ten golden rules for optimal antibiotic use in hospital settings: the WARNING call to action. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:50. [PMID: 37845673 PMCID: PMC10580644 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00518-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Antibiotics are recognized widely for their benefits when used appropriately. However, they are often used inappropriately despite the importance of responsible use within good clinical practice. Effective antibiotic treatment is an essential component of universal healthcare, and it is a global responsibility to ensure appropriate use. Currently, pharmaceutical companies have little incentive to develop new antibiotics due to scientific, regulatory, and financial barriers, further emphasizing the importance of appropriate antibiotic use. To address this issue, the Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery established an international multidisciplinary task force of 295 experts from 115 countries with different backgrounds. The task force developed a position statement called WARNING (Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance National/International Network Group) aimed at raising awareness of antimicrobial resistance and improving antibiotic prescribing practices worldwide. The statement outlined is 10 axioms, or "golden rules," for the appropriate use of antibiotics that all healthcare workers should consistently adhere in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
7
|
Catarci M, Guadagni S, Masedu F, Ruffo G, Viola MG, Borghi F, Baldazzi G, Scatizzi M. Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts. Int J Surg 2023; 109:2312-2323. [PMID: 37195782 PMCID: PMC10442086 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since most anastomoses after left-sided colorectal resections are performed with a circular stapler, any technological change in stapling devices may influence the incidence of anastomotic adverse events. The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of a three-row circular stapler on anastomotic leakage and related morbidity after left-sided colorectal resections. MATERIALS AND METHODS A circular stapled anastomosis was performed in 4255 (50.9%) out of 8359 patients enrolled in two prospective multicenter studies in Italy, and, after exclusion criteria to reduce heterogeneity, 2799 (65.8%) cases were retrospectively analyzed through a 1:1 propensity score-matching model including 20 covariates relative to patient characteristics, to surgery and to perioperative management. Two well-balanced groups of 425 patients each were obtained: group (A) - true population of interest, anastomosis performed with a three-row circular stapler; group (B) - control population, anastomosis performed with a two-row circular stapler. The target of inferences was the average treatment effect in the treated (ATT). The primary endpoints were overall and major anastomotic leakage and overall anastomotic bleeding; the secondary endpoints were overall and major morbidity and mortality rates. The results of multiple logistic regression analyses for the outcomes, including the 20 covariates selected for matching, were presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS Group A versus group B showed a significantly lower risk of overall anastomotic leakage (2.1 vs. 6.1%; OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.15-0.73; P =0.006), major anastomotic leakage (2.1 vs. 5.2%; OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.17-0.87; P =0.022), and major morbidity (3.5 vs. 6.6% events; OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.24-0.91; P =0.026). CONCLUSION The use of three-row circular staplers independently reduced the risk of anastomotic leakage and related morbidity after left-sided colorectal resection. Twenty-five patients were required to avoid one leakage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Rome
- General Surgery Unit, “C.&G. Mazzoni” Hospital, Ascoli Piceno
| | | | - Francesco Masedu
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila
| | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella (VR)
| | - Massimo G. Viola
- General Surgery Unit, Cardinale G. Panico Hospital, Tricase (LE)
| | - Felice Borghi
- Oncologic Surgery Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (TO)
- General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo
| | - Gianandrea Baldazzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano (MI)
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Nord Milano, Sesto San Giovanni (MI)
| | - Marco Scatizzi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata & Serristori Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Catarci M, Guadagni S, Masedu F, Montemurro LA, Ciano P, Benedetti M, Delrio P, Garulli G, Pirozzi F, Scatizzi M. Blood Transfusions and Adverse Events after Colorectal Surgery: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis of a Hen-Egg Issue. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13050952. [PMID: 36900095 PMCID: PMC10000587 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13050952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Blood transfusions are considered a risk factor for adverse outcomes after colorectal surgery. However, it is still unclear if they are the cause (the hen) or the consequence (the egg) of adverse events. A prospective database of 4529 colorectal resections gathered over a 12-month period in 76 Italian surgical units (the iCral3 study), reporting patient-, disease-, and procedure-related variables, together with 60-day adverse events, was retrospectively analyzed identifying a subgroup of 304 cases (6.7%) that received intra- and/or postoperative blood transfusions (IPBTs). The endpoints considered were overall and major morbidity (OM and MM, respectively), anastomotic leakage (AL), and mortality (M) rates. After the exclusion of 336 patients who underwent neo-adjuvant treatments, 4193 (92.6%) cases were analyzed through a 1:1 propensity score matching model including 22 covariates. Two well-balanced groups of 275 patients each were obtained: group A, presence of IPBT, and group B, absence of IPBT. Group A vs. group B showed a significantly higher risk of overall morbidity (154 (56%) vs. 84 (31%) events; OR 3.07; 95%CI 2.13-4.43; p = 0.001), major morbidity (59 (21%) vs. 13 (4.7%) events; OR 6.06; 95%CI 3.17-11.6; p = 0.001), and anastomotic leakage (31 (11.3%) vs. 8 (2.9%) events; OR 4.72; 95%CI 2.09-10.66; p = 0.0002). No significant difference was recorded between the two groups concerning the risk of mortality. The original subpopulation of 304 patients that received IPBT was further analyzed considering three variables: appropriateness of BT according to liberal transfusion thresholds, BT following any hemorrhagic and/or major adverse event, and major adverse event following BT without any previous hemorrhagic adverse event. Inappropriate BT was administered in more than a quarter of cases, without any significant influence on any endpoint. The majority of BT was administered after a hemorrhagic or a major adverse event, with significantly higher rates of MM and AL. Finally, a major adverse event followed BT in a minority (4.3%) of cases, with significantly higher MM, AL, and M rates. In conclusion, although the majority of IPBT was administered with the consequence of hemorrhage and/or major adverse events (the egg), after adjustment accounting for 22 covariates, IPBT still resulted in a definite source of a higher risk of major morbidity and anastomotic leakage rates after colorectal surgery (the hen), calling urgent attention to the implementation of patient blood management programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, 00157 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Stefano Guadagni
- General Surgery Unit, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesco Masedu
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Ciano
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, 00157 Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Benedetti
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, 00157 Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, “Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS-Italia”, 80131 Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Felice Pirozzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, 80078 Pozzuoli (NA), Italy
| | - Marco Scatizzi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata & Serristori Hospital, 50012 Firenze, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Giuliani G, Guerra F, Messinese S, Santelli F, Salvischiani L, Esposito S, Ferraro L, Esposito A, De Pastena M, Rega D, Delrio P, La Raja C, Spinelli A, Massaron S, De Nardi P, Kauffmann EF, Boggi U, Deidda S, Restivo A, Marano A, Borghi F, Piccoli M, Depalma N, D'Ugo S, Spampinato M, Cozzani F, Del Rio P, Marcellinaro R, Carlini M, De Rosa R, Scabini S, Maiello F, Polastri R, Turri G, Pedrazzani C, Zese M, Parini D, Casaril A, Moretto G, De Leo A, Catarci M, Trapani R, Zonta S, Marsanic P, Muratore A, Di Franco G, Morelli L, Coppola A, Caputo D, Andreuccetti J, Pignata G, Mastrangelo L, Jovine E, Mazzola M, Ferrari G, Mariani L, Ceccarelli G, Giuseppe R, Bolzon S, Grasso M, Testa S, Germani P, de Manzini N, Langella S, Ferrero A, Coletta D, Bianchi PP, Bengala C, Coratti A. The COVID - AGICT study: COVID-19 and advanced gastro-intestinal cancer surgical treatment. A multicentric Italian study on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic impact on gastro-intestinal cancers surgical treatment during the 2020. Analysis of perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes. Surg Oncol 2023; 47:101907. [PMID: 36924550 PMCID: PMC9892255 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.101907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This Italian multicentric retrospective study aimed to investigate the possible changes in outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD Our primary endpoint was to determine whether the pandemic scenario increased the rate of patients with colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers resected at an advanced stage in 2020 compared to 2019. Considering different cancer staging systems, we divided tumors into early stages and advanced stages, using pathological outcomes. Furthermore, to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical outcomes, perioperative data of both 2020 and 2019 were also examined. RESULTS Overall, a total of 8250 patients, 4370 (53%) and 3880 (47%) were surgically treated during 2019 and 2020 respectively, in 62 Italian surgical Units. In 2020, the rate of patients treated with an advanced pathological stage was not different compared to 2019 (P = 0.25). Nevertheless, the analysis of quarters revealed that in the second half of 2020 the rate of advanced cancer resected, tented to be higher compared with the same months of 2019 (P = 0.05). During the pandemic year 'Charlson Comorbidity Index score of cancer patients (5.38 ± 2.08 vs 5.28 ± 2.22, P = 0.036), neoadjuvant treatments (23.9% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.001), rate of urgent diagnosis (24.2% vs 20.3%, P < 0.001), colorectal cancer urgent resection (9.4% vs. 7.37, P < 0.001), and the rate of positive nodes on the total nodes resected per surgery increased significantly (7 vs 9% - 2.02 ± 4.21 vs 2.39 ± 5.23, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Although the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic did not influence the pathological stage of colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers at the time of surgery, our study revealed that the pandemic scenario negatively impacted on several perioperative and post-operative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Giuliani
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Usl Toscana Sud Est. School of Robotic Surgery, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Francesco Guerra
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Usl Toscana Sud Est. School of Robotic Surgery, Grosseto, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Santelli
- Department of Economics, Business, Mathematics and Statistics (DEAMS), University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Lucia Salvischiani
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Usl Toscana Sud Est. School of Robotic Surgery, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Sofia Esposito
- Department of General, Emergency Surgery and New Technologies, Baggiovara General Hospital, AOU Modena, Italy
| | - Luca Ferraro
- Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo De Pastena
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Daniela Rega
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Carlotta La Raja
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Simonetta Massaron
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola De Nardi
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Simona Deidda
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Center, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Angelo Restivo
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Center, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessandra Marano
- General and Specialist Surgery Department, Emergency General Surgery Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Felice Borghi
- Oncological Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060, Torino, Italy
| | - Micaela Piccoli
- Department of General, Emergency Surgery and New Technologies, Baggiovara General Hospital, AOU Modena, Italy
| | - Norma Depalma
- Department of General Surgery, "Vito Fazzi" Hospital, Piazza Muratore, 1-73100, Lecce, Italy
| | - Stefano D'Ugo
- Department of General Surgery, "Vito Fazzi" Hospital, Piazza Muratore, 1-73100, Lecce, Italy
| | - Marcello Spampinato
- Department of General Surgery, "Vito Fazzi" Hospital, Piazza Muratore, 1-73100, Lecce, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Del Rio
- General Surgery Unit, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Rosa Marcellinaro
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, Piazzale dell'Umanesimo, 10, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Carlini
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, Piazzale dell'Umanesimo, 10, 00144, Rome, Italy
| | - Raffaele De Rosa
- Surgical Oncology Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefano Scabini
- Surgical Oncology Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Fabio Maiello
- Department of Surgery - General Surgery Unit, Hospital of Biella, Biella, Italy
| | - Roberto Polastri
- Department of Surgery - General Surgery Unit, Hospital of Biella, Biella, Italy
| | - Giulia Turri
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Unit of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Corrado Pedrazzani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Unit of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Monica Zese
- Department of General and Urgent Surgery, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Dario Parini
- Department of General and Urgent Surgery, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Andrea Casaril
- Department of Surgery, "Pederzoli" Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Moretto
- Department of Surgery, "Pederzoli" Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio De Leo
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Via dei Monti Tiburtini, 385, 00157, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Via dei Monti Tiburtini, 385, 00157, Rome, Italy
| | - Renza Trapani
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale San Biagio, ASL VCO, Domodossola, Italy
| | - Sandro Zonta
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale San Biagio, ASL VCO, Domodossola, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Muratore
- Surgical Department, E. Agnelli Hospital, 10064, Pinerolo, Italy
| | - Gregorio Di Franco
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy
| | - Luca Morelli
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Damiano Caputo
- Research Unit of Generale Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy; Operative Research Unit of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200 - 00128, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Giusto Pignata
- Second General Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Laura Mastrangelo
- Division of General and Emergency Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Division of General and Emergency Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michele Mazzola
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Mariani
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Foligno, Italy
| | - Rocco Giuseppe
- Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Area Vasta Romagna, Santa Maria delle Croci - Ravenna Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Stefano Bolzon
- Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Area Vasta Romagna, Santa Maria delle Croci - Ravenna Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | | | - Silvio Testa
- S.C. Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale S.Andrea, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Paola Germani
- Surgical Clinic Unit, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Nicolò de Manzini
- Surgical Clinic Unit, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Serena Langella
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Diego Coletta
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Pietro Bianchi
- Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milano, Italy
| | - Carmelo Bengala
- Medical Oncology Unit, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Usl Toscana Sud Est. School of Robotic Surgery, Grosseto, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lombardi PM, Bernasconi D, Baiocchi GL, Berselli M, Biondi A, Castoro C, Catarci M, Degiuli M, Fumagalli Romario U, Giacopuzzi S, Marchesi F, Marrelli D, Mazzola M, Molfino S, Olmi S, Rausei S, Rosa F, Rosati R, Roviello F, Santi S, Solaini L, Staderini F, Viganò J, Ferrari G. Open versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of survival in a western population-on behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer. Gastric Cancer 2022; 25:1105-1116. [PMID: 35864239 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-022-01321-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in the West have been poorly investigated. The aim of the present study was to compare survival outcomes in patients undergoing curative-intent laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in several centres belonging to the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer. METHODS Data of patients operated between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Propensity Score Matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics of patients undergoing laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival. Secondary endpoints were 3-year disease-free survival and short-term outcomes. Multivariable regression analyses for survival were conducted. RESULTS Data were retrieved from 20 centres. Of the 717 patients included, 438 patients were correctly matched, 219 per group. The 3-year overall survival was 73.6% and 68.7% in the laparoscopic and open group, respectively (p = 0.40). When compared with open gastrectomy, laparoscopic gastrectomy showed comparable 3-year disease-free survival (62.8%, vs 58.9%, p = 0.40), higher rate of return to intended oncologic treatment (56.9% vs 40.2%, p = 0.001), similar 30-day morbidity/mortality. Prognostic factors for survival were ASA Score ≥ 3, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 5, lymph node ratio ≥ 0.15, p/ypTNM Stage III and return to intended oncologic treatment. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer offers similar rates of survival when compared to open gastrectomy, with higher rates of return to intended oncologic treatment. ASA score, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, lymph node ratio, return to intended oncologic treatment and p/ypTNM Stage, but not surgical approach, are prognostic factors for survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Maria Lombardi
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, Niguarda Cancer Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy. .,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Unit of Foregut Surgery, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy.
| | - D Bernasconi
- Bicocca Bioinformatics Biostatistics and Bioimaging Centre-B4, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.,Functional Department for Higher Education, Research, and Development, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - G L Baiocchi
- General Surgery, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy.,Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Berselli
- Unit of General Surgery, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, ASST Settelaghi, Varese, Italy
| | - A Biondi
- Dipartimento Di Scienze Mediche E Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli n. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito n.1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - C Castoro
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Unit of Foregut Surgery, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072, Milan, Italy
| | - M Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Rome, Italy
| | - M Degiuli
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.,Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery Unit, San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - U Fumagalli Romario
- Digestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - S Giacopuzzi
- Department of General and Upper G.I. Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - F Marchesi
- Unit of General Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - D Marrelli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - M Mazzola
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, Niguarda Cancer Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - S Molfino
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia and Third Division of General Surgery, Brescia Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - S Olmi
- Head of General and Oncologic Surgery. Center for Minimal Invasive and Laparoscopic Surgery, Policlinico San Marco, Senior Research Vita-Salute University San Raffaele Milan (UNISR), Zingonia, Italy
| | - S Rausei
- Department of Surgery, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - F Rosa
- Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - R Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Research Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy.,Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - F Roviello
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - S Santi
- Division of Esophageal Surgery Regional Referral Center "Mauro Rossi" for Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases of Esophagus, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana (AOUP), Via Paradisa 2, 56010, Pisa, Italy
| | - L Solaini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - F Staderini
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - J Viganò
- General Surgery. Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - G Ferrari
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, Niguarda Cancer Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mengardo V, Weindelmayer J, Veltri A, Giacopuzzi S, Torroni L, de Manzoni G, Agresta F, Alfieri R, Alfieri S, Antonacci N, Baiocchi GL, Bencini L, Bencivenga M, Benedetti M, Berselli M, Biondi A, Capolupo GT, Carboni F, Casadei R, Casella F, Catarci M, Cerri P, Chiari D, Cocozza E, Colombo G, Cozzaglio L, Dalmonte G, Degiuli M, De Luca M, De Luca R, De Manzini N, De Pasqual CA, De Pascale S, De Ruvo N, Di Cosmo M, Di Leo A, Di Paola M, Elio A, Ferrara F, Ferrari G, Fiscon V, Fumagalli U, Garulli G, Gennai A, Gentile I, Germani P, Gualtierotti M, Guerini F, Gurrado A, Inama M, La Torre F, Laterza E, Losurdo P, Macrì A, Marano A, Marano L, Marchesi F, Marino F, Massani M, Menghi R, Milone M, Molfino S, Montuori M, Moretto G, Morgagni P, Morpurgo E, Abdallah M, Nespoli L, Olmi S, Palaia R, Pallabazer G, Parise P, Pasculli A, Pericoli Ridolfini M, Pesce A, Pinotti E, Pisano M, Poiasina E, Postiglione V, Rausei S, Rella A, Rosa F, Rosati R, Rossi G, Rossit L, Rovatti M, Ruspi L, Sacco L, Saladino E, Sansonetti A, Sartori A, Scaglione D, Scaringi S, Schoenthaler C, Sena G, Simone M, Solaini L, Strignano P, Tartaglia N, Testa S, Testini M, Tiberio GAM, Treppiedi E, Vagliasindi A, Valmasoni M, Viganò J, Zanchettin G, Zanoni A, Zardini C, Zerbinati A. Current practice on the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy in Italy: the Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy (ADiGe) survey. Updates Surg 2022; 74:1839-1849. [PMID: 36279038 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01397-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
AbstractEvidence against the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy are increasing and ERAS guidelines suggest the benefit of drain avoidance. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether this practice is still widespread. We conducted a survey among Italian surgeons through the Italian Gastric Cancer Research Group and the Polispecialistic Society of Young Surgeons, aiming to understand the current use of prophylactic drain. A 28-item questionnaire-based survey was developed to analyze the current practice and the individual opinion about the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy. Groups based on age, experience and unit volume were separately analyzed. Response of 104 surgeons from 73 surgical units were collected. A standardized ERAS protocol for gastrectomy was applied by 42% of the respondents. Most of the surgeons, regardless of age, experience, or unit volume, declared to routinely place one or more drain after gastrectomy. Only 2 (1.9%) and 7 surgeons (6.7%) belonging to high volume units, do not routinely place drains after total and subtotal gastrectomy, respectively. More than 60% of the participants remove the drain on postoperative day 4–6 after performing an assessment of the anastomosis integrity. Interestingly, less than half of the surgeons believe that drain is the main tool for leak management, and this percentage further drops among younger surgeons. On the other hand, drain’s role seems to be more defined for duodenal stump leak treatment, with almost 50% of the surgeons recognizing its importance. Routine use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy is still a widespread practice even if younger surgeons are more persuaded that it could not be advantageous.
Collapse
|
12
|
Catarci M, Ruffo G, Viola MG, Pirozzi F, Delrio P, Borghi F, Garulli G, Baldazzi G, Marini P, Sica G. ERAS program adherence-institutionalization, major morbidity and anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery: the iCral2 multicenter prospective study. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:3965-3984. [PMID: 34519893 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08717-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs influence morbidity rates and length of stay after colorectal surgery (CRS), and may also impact major complications and anastomotic leakage rates. A prospective multicenter observational study to investigate the interactions between ERAS program adherence and early outcomes after elective CRS was carried out. METHODS Prospective enrolment of patients submitted to elective CRS with anastomosis in 18 months. Adherence to 21 items of ERAS program was measured upon explicit criteria in every case. After univariate analysis, independent predictors of primary endpoints [major morbidity (MM) and anastomotic leakage (AL) rates] were identified through logistic regression analyses including all significant variables, presenting odds ratios (OR). RESULTS Institutional ERAS protocol was declared by 27 out of 38 (71.0%) participating centers. Median overall adherence to ERAS program items was 71.4%. Among 3830 patients included in the study, MM and AL rates were 4.7% and 4.2%, respectively. MM rates were independently influenced by intra- and/or postoperative blood transfusions (OR 7.79, 95% CI 5.46-11.10; p < 0.0001) and standard anesthesia protocol (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96; p = 0.028). AL rates were independently influenced by male gender (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.06-2.07; p = 0.021), intra- and/or postoperative blood transfusions (OR 4.29, 95% CI 2.93-6.50; p < 0.0001) and non-standard resections (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.22; p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS This study disclosed wide room for improvement in compliance to several ERAS program items. It failed to detect any significant association between institutionalization and/or adherence rates to ERAS program with primary endpoints. These outcomes were independently influenced by gender, intra- and postoperative blood transfusions, non-standard resections, and standard anesthesia protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, "C. E G. Mazzoni" Hospital, Ascoli Piceno, Italy. .,General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Via dei Monti Tiburtini, 385, 00157, Rome, Italy.
| | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy
| | | | - Felice Pirozzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Pozzuoli, NA, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS-Italia", Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Borghi
- General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | | | - Pierluigi Marini
- General Surgery Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sica
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Policlinico tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tebala GD, Milani MS, Cirocchi R, Bignell M, Bond-Smith G, Lewis C, Agnoletti V, Catarci M, Di Saverio S, Luridiana G, Catena F, Scatizzi M, Marini P. The weekend effect on the provision of Emergency Surgery before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: case-control analysis of a retrospective multicentre database. World J Emerg Surg 2022; 17:22. [PMID: 35488247 PMCID: PMC9051756 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00425-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The concept of “weekend effect”, that is, substandard healthcare during weekends, has never been fully demonstrated, and the different outcomes of emergency surgical patients admitted during weekends may be due to different conditions at admission and/or different therapeutic approaches. Aim of this international audit was to identify any change of pattern of emergency surgical admissions and treatments during weekends. Furthermore, we aimed at investigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the alleged “weekend effect”.
Methods The database of the CovidICE-International Study was interrogated, and 6263 patients were selected for analysis. Non-trauma, 18+ yo patients admitted to 45 emergency surgery units in Europe in the months of March–April 2019 and March–April 2020 were included. Demographic and clinical data were anonymised by the referring centre and centrally collected and analysed with a statistical package. This study was endorsed by the Association of Italian Hospital Surgeons (ACOI) and the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES).
Results Three-quarters of patients have been admitted during workdays and only 25.7% during weekends. There was no difference in the distribution of gender, age, ASA class and diagnosis during weekends with respect to workdays. The first wave of the COVID pandemic caused a one-third reduction of emergency surgical admission both during workdays and weekends but did not change the relation between workdays and weekends. The treatment was more often surgical for patients admitted during weekends, with no difference between 2019 and 2020, and procedures were more often performed by open surgery. However, patients admitted during weekends had a threefold increased risk of laparoscopy-to-laparotomy conversion (1% vs. 3.4%). Hospital stay was longer in patients admitted during weekends, but those patients had a lower risk of readmission. There was no difference of the rate of rescue surgery between weekends and workdays. Subgroup analysis revealed that interventional procedures for hot gallbladder were less frequently performed on patients admitted during weekends. Conclusions Our analysis revealed that demographic and clinical profiles of patients admitted during weekends do not differ significantly from workdays, but the therapeutic strategy may be different probably due to lack of availability of services and skillsets during weekends. The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic did not impact on this difference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni D Tebala
- Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK. .,Digestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera "S.Maria", "S.Maria" Hospital, Viale Tristano di Joannuccio, 05100, Terni, Italy.
| | - Marika S Milani
- Department of General Surgery, Causa Pia Luvini Hospital, Cittiglio, Italy
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- Digestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera "S.Maria", "S.Maria" Hospital, Viale Tristano di Joannuccio, 05100, Terni, Italy
| | - Mark Bignell
- Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Giles Bond-Smith
- Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher Lewis
- Surgical Emergency Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, "M. Bufalini" Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Marco Catarci
- Department of General Surgery, "S. Pertini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Department of General Surgery, Madonna del Soccorso Hospital, S.Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | | | - Fausto Catena
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, "M. Bufalini" Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Marco Scatizzi
- Department of General Surgery, S.Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Marini
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, S.Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mazzei MA, Bagnacci G, Gentili F, Capitoni I, Mura G, Marrelli D, Petrioli R, Brunese L, Cappabianca S, Catarci M, Degiuli M, De Manzoni G, De Prizio M, Donini A, Romario UF, Funicelli L, Laghi A, Minetti G, Morgagni P, Petrella E, Pittiani F, Rausei S, Romanini L, Rosati R, Ianora AAS, Tiberio GAM, Volterrani L, Roviello F, Grassi R. Structured and shared CT radiological report of gastric cancer: a consensus proposal by the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) and the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). Eur Radiol 2022; 32:938-949. [PMID: 34383148 PMCID: PMC8359760 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08205-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Written radiological report remains the most important means of communication between radiologist and referring medical/surgical doctor, even though CT reports are frequently just descriptive, unclear, and unstructured. The Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM) and the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) promoted a critical shared discussion between 10 skilled radiologists and 10 surgical oncologists, by means of multi-round consensus-building Delphi survey, to develop a structured reporting template for CT of GC patients. METHODS Twenty-four items were organized according to the broad categories of a structured report as suggested by the European Society of Radiology (clinical referral, technique, findings, conclusion, and advice) and grouped into three "CT report sections" depending on the diagnostic phase of the radiological assessment for the oncologic patient (staging, restaging, and follow-up). RESULTS In the final round, 23 out of 24 items obtained agreement ( ≥ 8) and consensus ( ≤ 2) and 19 out 24 items obtained a good stability (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The structured report obtained, shared by surgical and medical oncologists and radiologists, allows an appropriate, clearer, and focused CT report essential to high-quality patient care in GC, avoiding the exclusion of key radiological information useful for multidisciplinary decision-making. KEY POINTS • Imaging represents the cornerstone for tailored treatment in GC patients. • CT-structured radiology report in GC patients is useful for multidisciplinary decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Antonietta Mazzei
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Neuro Sciences, University of Siena and Department of Radiological Sciences, Unit of Diagnostic Imaging, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy ,SIRM, Italian College of Computed Tomography, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulio Bagnacci
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Neuro Sciences, University of Siena and Department of Radiological Sciences, Unit of Diagnostic Imaging, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy ,SIRM, Italian College of Computed Tomography, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Gentili
- SIRM, Italian College of Computed Tomography, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, Milan, Italy ,Unit of Diagnostic Imaging, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Iacopo Capitoni
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Neuro Sciences, University of Siena and Department of Radiological Sciences, Unit of Diagnostic Imaging, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Gianni Mura
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Arezzo Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Daniele Marrelli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Roberto Petrioli
- Department of Oncology, Unit of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Luca Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy ,SIRM, Italian College of Oncology, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Cappabianca
- SIRM, Italian College of Oncology, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, Milan, Italy ,Division of Radiology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Catarci
- FACS; UOC Chirurgia Generale; Ospedale Sandro Pertini – ASL Roma 2, Roma, Italy
| | - Maurizio Degiuli
- Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin; San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | | | - Marco De Prizio
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Arezzo Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Annibale Donini
- Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Funicelli
- SIRM, Italian College of Computed Tomography, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, Milan, Italy ,SIRM, Italian College of Oncology, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, Milan, Italy ,Digestive Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology – IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome – Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy ,SIRM, Italian College of Gastroenterology, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Minetti
- SIRM, Italian College of Computed Tomography, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, Milan, Italy ,Radiology Department, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS per L’Oncologia e le Neuroscienze, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Morgagni
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Enrico Petrella
- Radiology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Frida Pittiani
- SIRM, Italian College of Computed Tomography, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, Milan, Italy ,Department of Radiology, ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano Rausei
- Department of Surgery, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Varese, Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Rosati
- Endocrine Unit, Department of Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Guido A. M. Tiberio
- Surgical Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Volterrani
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Neuro Sciences, University of Siena and Department of Radiological Sciences, Unit of Diagnostic Imaging, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy ,SIRM, Italian College of Oncology, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, Milan, Italy
| | - Franco Roviello
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Roberto Grassi
- Division of Radiology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy ,SIRM Foundation, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Guerra F, Petrelli F, Greco PA, Sisti V, Catarci M, Montalti R, Patriti A. The impact of synchronous liver resection on the risk of anastomotic leakage following elective colorectal resection. A propensity score match analysis on behalf of the iCral study group. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2873-2879. [PMID: 34119377 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION how best to manage patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastasis is still controversial, with specific concerns of increased risk of postoperative complications following combined resection. We aimed at analyzing the influence of combined liver resection on the risk of anastomotic leak (AL) following colorectal resection. METHODS we reviewed the iCral prospectively maintained database to compare the relative risk of AL of patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer to that of patients receiving simultaneous liver and colorectal resection for cancer with isolated hepatic metastases. The incidence of AL was the primary outcome of the analysis. Perioperative details and postoperative complications were also appraised. RESULTS out of a total of 996 patients who underwent colorectal resection for cancer, 206 receiving isolated colorectal resection were compared with a matched group of 53 patients undergoing simultaneous liver and colorectal resection. Combined surgery had greater operative time and resulted in longer postoperative hospitalization compared to colorectal resection alone. The proportion of overall morbidity following combined resection was significantly higher than after isolated colorectal resection (56.6% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.021). Overall, the two groups of patients did not differ neither on the rate of major postoperative complications, nor in terms of AL (9.4% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.381). At specific multivariate analysis, the duration of surgery was the only risk factor independently associated with the likelihood of AL. CONCLUSIONS combining hepatic with colorectal resection for the treatment of synchronous liver metastasis from colorectal cancer does not increase significantly the incidence of AL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Guerra
- Division of General Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy.
| | - Filippo Petrelli
- Division of General Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | | | - Valerio Sisti
- Division of General Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Marco Catarci
- Division of General Surgery, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Montalti
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University, Napoli, Italy
| | - Alberto Patriti
- Division of General Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Grottesi A, Bianchi L, Ranieri FM, Puce E, Catarci M. Unusual segmental ischemia of the small bowel from cocaine abuse. J Surg Case Rep 2021; 2021:rjab074. [PMID: 33884165 PMCID: PMC8046013 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjab074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Cocaine abuse is rising in the young population, triggering uncommon and potentially life-threatening causes of acute abdomen in this age group. The authors present the case of a 30-year-old man with emergency admission due to abdominal pain, with no history of drug abuse. Several signs and symptoms elicited toxicologic blood screening, which disclosed high serum levels of cocaine and its metabolites. Twelve hours after admission, the onset of acute abdomen with signs of diffuse peritonitis prompted surgical exploration through a minimally invasive approach. Two segmental small bowel ischemic loops and diffuse peritonitis, but no bowel perforation, were identified and treated by laparoscopic peritoneal lavage with 5 l of heated saline and intravenous administration of sodium heparin, 10 000 IU. Postoperative course was uneventful with home discharge on postoperative day 5. High index of suspicion is required to establish a prompt diagnosis and treatment of this uncommon cocaine abuse-related disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso Grottesi
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital - ASL Roma 2, Roma, Italy
| | - Leonello Bianchi
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital - ASL Roma 2, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Ernesto Puce
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital - ASL Roma 2, Roma, Italy
| | - Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital - ASL Roma 2, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Baiocchi GL, Guercioni G, Vettoretto N, Scabini S, Millo P, Muratore A, Clementi M, Sica G, Delrio P, Longo G, Anania G, Barbieri V, Amodio P, Di Marco C, Baldazzi G, Garulli G, Patriti A, Pirozzi F, De Luca R, Mancini S, Pedrazzani C, Scaramuzzi M, Scatizzi M, Taglietti L, Motter M, Ceccarelli G, Totis M, Gennai A, Frazzini D, Di Mauro G, Capolupo GT, Crafa F, Marini P, Ruffo G, Persiani R, Borghi F, de Manzini N, Catarci M. ICG fluorescence imaging in colorectal surgery: a snapshot from the ICRAL study group. BMC Surg 2021; 21:190. [PMID: 33838677 PMCID: PMC8035779 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01191-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Fluorescence-guided visualization is a recently proposed technology in colorectal surgery. Possible uses include evaluating perfusion, navigating lymph nodes and searching for hepatic metastases and peritoneal spread. Despite the absence of high-level evidence, this technique has gained considerable popularity among colorectal surgeons due to its significant reliability, safety, ease of use and relatively low cost. However, the actual use of this technique in daily clinical practice has not been reported to date. Methods This survey was conducted on April 2020 among 44 centers dealing with colorectal diseases and participating in the Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group. Surgeons were approximately equally divided based on geographical criteria from multiple Italian regions, with a large proportion based in public (89.1%) and nonacademic (75.7%) centers. They were invited to answer an online survey to snapshot their current behaviors regarding the use of fluorescence-guided visualization in colorectal surgery. Questions regarding technological availability, indications and techniques, personal approaches and feelings were collected in a 23-item questionnaire. Results Questionnaire replies were received from 37 institutions and partially answered by 8, as this latter group of centers do not implement fluorescence technology (21.6%). Out of the remaining 29 centers (78,4%), fluorescence is utilized in all laparoscopic colorectal resections by 72.4% of surgeons and only for selected cases by the remaining 27.6%, while 62.1% of respondents do not use fluorescence in open surgery (unless the perfusion is macroscopically uncertain with the naked eye, in which case 41.4% of them do). The survey also suggests that there is no agreement on dilution, dosing and timing, as many different practices are adopted based on personal judgment. Only approximately half of the surgeons reported a reduced leak rate with fluorescence perfusion assessment, but 65.5% of them strongly believe that this technique will become a minimum requirement for colorectal surgery in the future. Conclusion The survey confirms that fluorescence is becoming a widely used technique in colorectal surgery. However, both the indications and methods still vary considerably; furthermore, the surgeons' perceptions of the results are insufficient to consider this technology essential. This survey emphasizes the need for further research to reach recommendations based on solid scientific evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Luca Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
| | | | - Nereo Vettoretto
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Montichiari, BS, Italy
| | - Stefano Scabini
- General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, National Cancer Center "San Martino", Genova, Italy
| | - Paolo Millo
- General Surgery Unit, Aosta Regional Hospital, Aosta, Italy
| | | | - Marco Clementi
- General Surgery Unit, University Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sica
- General Surgery Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata University Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS G. Pascale Foundation, Napoli, Italy
| | | | | | - Vittoria Barbieri
- General Surgery Unit, Cardinale G. Panico Hospital, Tricase, LE, Italy
| | - Pietro Amodio
- General Surgery Unit, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Carlo Di Marco
- General Surgery Unit, Conegliano Hospital (TV) ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Conegliano, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Patriti
- General Surgery Unit, Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro e Fano, PU, Italy
| | - Felice Pirozzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASL Napoli2 Hospital, Pozzuoli, NA, Italy
| | - Raffaele De Luca
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancini
- General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Scaramuzzi
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
| | - Marco Scatizzi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | | | - Michele Motter
- General Surgery Unit 1, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | | | - Mauro Totis
- General Surgery Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Andrea Gennai
- General Surgery Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Spezia, Italy
| | - Diletta Frazzini
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale Civile Di Pescara, Pescara, Italy
| | | | | | - Francesco Crafa
- General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, VR, Italy
| | - Roberto Persiani
- Minimally Invasive Oncologic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Gemelli Foundation, Roma, Italy
| | - Felice Borghi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Croce E Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | - Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, CG Mazzoni Hospital, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Guercioni G, Benedetti M, Catarci M. Laparoscopic jejunal resection for perforation of solitary jejunal diverticulum - a video vignette. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:1805-1806. [PMID: 32629537 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- G Guercioni
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale 'C. e G. Mazzoni', Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - M Benedetti
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale 'C. e G. Mazzoni', Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - M Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale 'C. e G. Mazzoni', Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Catarci M, Benedetti M, Maurizi A, Spinelli F, Bernacconi T, Guercioni G, Campagnacci R. ERAS pathway in colorectal surgery: structured implementation program and high adherence for improved outcomes. Updates Surg 2020; 73:123-137. [PMID: 33094366 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00885-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Although there is clear evidence that an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in colorectal surgery leads to significantly reduced morbidity rates and length of hospital stay (LOS), it is still unclear what modalities and levels of implementation of the program are necessary to achieve these results. The purpose of this study is to analyze the methods and results of the first year of structured implementation of a colorectal ERAS program in two surgical units of the Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR) Marche in Italy. A two-center observational study on a prospectively maintained database was performed on 196 consecutive colorectal resections (excluding emergencies and American Society of Anesthesiologists class > III cases) over a 1-year period. More than 50 variables including adherence to the individual items of the ERAS program were considered. Primary outcomes were overall morbidity, major morbidity, mortality and anastomotic leakage rates; secondary outcomes were LOS, re-admission and re-operation. The results were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses through logistic regression. After a median follow-up of 39.5 days, we recorded complications in 72 patients (overall morbidity 36.7%), major complications in 14 patients (major morbidity 7.1%), 6 deaths (mortality 3.1%), anastomotic dehiscence in 9 cases (4.9%), mean overall LOS of 6.6 days, 10 readmissions (5.1%) and 13 reoperations (6.7%). The mean adherence rate to the items of the ERAS program was 85.4%, showing a significant dose-effect curve for overall and major morbidity rates, anastomotic leakage rates and LOS. The implementation methods of a colorectal ERAS program in this study led to a high adherence (> 80%) to the program items. High adherence had significant effects also on major morbidity and anastomotic leakage rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy. .,Direttore UOC Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale "C. e G. Mazzoni"-AV5-ASUR Marche, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy.
| | - Michele Benedetti
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| | - Angela Maurizi
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale C. Urbani Jesi (AN), AV 2, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| | - Francesco Spinelli
- Anesthesiology Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| | - Tonino Bernacconi
- Anesthesiology Unit, Ospedale C. Urbani Jesi (AN), AV 2, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| | - Gianluca Guercioni
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale C.G. Mazzoni Ascoli Piceno, AV 5, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| | - Roberto Campagnacci
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale C. Urbani Jesi (AN), AV 2, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR), Marche, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Marziali I, Cicconi S, Marilungo F, Benedetti M, Ciano P, Pagano P, D'Emidio F, Guercioni G, Catarci M. Role of percutaneous cholecystostomy in all-comers with acute cholecystitis according to current guidelines in a general surgical unit. Updates Surg 2020; 73:473-480. [PMID: 33058055 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00897-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) is a very common complication of gallstone-related disease. Its currently recommended management changes according to severity of disease and fitness for surgery. The aim of this observational study is to assess the short- and long-term outcomes in all-comers admitted with diagnosis of ACC, treated according to 2013 Tokyo Guidelines (TG13). A retrospective analysis was conducted on a prospectively maintained database of 125 patients with diagnosis of ACC consecutively admitted between January 2017 and September 2019, subdivided in three groups according to TG13: percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC group), cholecystectomy (CH group), and conservative medical treatment (MT group). The primary end point was a composite of morbidity and/or mortality rates; the secondary end points were ACC recurrence, readmission, need for cholecystectomy rates and overall length of hospital stay (LOS). After a median follow-up of 639 days, overall morbidity rate was 20.8% and mortality rate was 6.4%. Death was directly related to AC during the index admission in two out of eight cases. There were no significant differences in primary end point according to the treatment group. Concerning secondary end points, ACC recurrence rate was not significantly different after PC (10.0%) or MT (9.1%); the readmission rates were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in the MT group (48.5%) and in the PC group (25.0%) than in the CH group (5.8%); need for cholecystectomy rates was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in the MT group (42.4%) than in the PC group (20.0%); median overall LOS was significantly higher in the PC (16 days) than in the MT (9 days) and than in the CH group (5 days). PC is an effective and safe rescue procedure in high-risk patients with ACC, representing a definitive treatment in 80% of cases of this specific subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Marziali
- General Surgery, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Simone Cicconi
- General Surgery, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Fabio Marilungo
- General Surgery, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Michele Benedetti
- General Surgery, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Paolo Ciano
- General Surgery, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Paolo Pagano
- Interventional Radiology Units, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Fabio D'Emidio
- Interventional Radiology Units, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Gianluca Guercioni
- General Surgery, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Marco Catarci
- General Surgery, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Catarci M, Balla A, Coppola L. Unusual presentation of small bowel GIST: diffuse omental & mesenteric sarcomatosis. J Surg Case Rep 2020; 2020:rjaa341. [PMID: 32994921 PMCID: PMC7505409 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjaa341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent ~1% of gastrointestinal (GI) tract neoplasms. Unusual presentation of a small bowel GIST with diffuse omental and mesenteric implants in a symptomatic patient is reported. CT scan in a 68-years-old woman showed multiple processes with solid density and colliquation areas in the abdominal cavity. At surgery, an uncommon finding of multiple omental and mesenteric secondary implants was evident. The index mass with 40 cm of adjacent small bowel, omentum and all peritoneal lesions were completely removed. Definitive pathology report showed a small bowel GIST with focal areas of necrosis and high mitotic activity (35 mitosis/50 High Power Fields), with multiple metastases on mesentery and omentum. Patient was therefore submitted to adjuvant treatment with Imatinib and a close follow-up program. Small bowel GIST with high mitotic activity may present with diffuse omental and mesenteric peritoneal seedings. Complete surgical clearance remains the mainstay of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, "C. & G. Mazzoni" Hospital, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Andrea Balla
- General Surgery Unit, "San Paolo" Hospital, Civitavecchia, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Caricato M, Baiocchi GL, Crafa F, Scabini S, Brisinda G, Clementi M, Sica G, Delrio P, Longo G, Anania G, de Manzini N, Amodio P, Lucchi A, Baldazzi G, Garulli G, Patriti A, Pirozzi F, Pavanello M, Carrara A, Campagnacci R, Liverani A, Muratore A, Siquini W, De Luca R, Mancini S, Borghi F, Di Cosmo M, Persiani R, Pedrazzani C, Scaramuzzi M, Scatizzi M, Vettoretto N, Totis M, Gennai A, Marini P, Basti M, Viola M, Ruffo G, Catarci M. Colorectal surgery in Italy during the Covid19 outbreak: a survey from the iCral study group. Updates Surg 2020; 72:249-257. [PMID: 32436016 PMCID: PMC7238958 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00760-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID19 pandemic had a deep impact on healthcare facilities in Italy, with profound reorganization of surgical activities. The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group collecting 43 Italian surgical centers experienced in colorectal surgery from multiple regions performed a quick survey to make a snapshot of the current situation. METHODS A 25-items questionnaire was sent to the 43 principal investigators of the iCral study group, with questions regarding qualitative and quantitative aspects of the surgical activity before and after the COVID19 outbreak. RESULTS Two-thirds of the centers were involved in the treatment of COVID19 cases. Intensive care units (ICU) beds were partially or totally reallocated for the treatment of COVID19 cases in 72% of the hospitals. Elective colorectal surgery for malignancy was stopped or delayed in nearly 30% of the centers, with less than 20% of them still scheduling elective colorectal resections for frail and comorbid patients needing postoperative ICU care. A significant reduction of the number of colorectal resections during the time span from January to March 2020 was recorded, with significant delay in treatment in more than 50% of the centers. DISCUSSION Our survey confirms that COVID19 outbreak is severely affecting the activity of colorectal surgery centers participating to iCral study group. This could impact the activity of surgical centers for many months after the end of the emergency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Caricato
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Campus BioMedico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Crafa
- General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy
| | - Stefano Scabini
- General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, National Cancer Center "San Martino", Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Marco Clementi
- General Surgery Unit, University Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sica
- General Surgery Unit, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS G. Pascale Foundation, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Pietro Amodio
- General Surgery Unit, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Andrea Lucchi
- General Surgery Unit, Ceccarini Hospital, Riccione, RN, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Patriti
- General Surgery Unit, Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro e Fano, PU, Italy
| | - Felice Pirozzi
- General Surgery Unit, ASL Napoli2 Hospital, Pozzuoli, NA, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Andrea Liverani
- General Surgery Unit, Regina Apostolorum Hospital, Albano Laziale, RM, Italy
| | - Andrea Muratore
- General Surgery Unit, E. Agnelli Hospital, Pinerolo, TO, Italy
| | - Walter Siquini
- General Surgery Unit, ASUR AV3 Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | - Raffaele De Luca
- Surgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancini
- General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Borghi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Matteo Scaramuzzi
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
| | - Marco Scatizzi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | - Nereo Vettoretto
- General Surgery Unit, Spedali Civili of Brescia, Montichiari, BS, Italy
| | - Mauro Totis
- General Surgery Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Andrea Gennai
- General Surgery Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Spezia, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Basti
- General Surgery Unit, Santo Spirito Hospital, Pescara, Italy
| | - Massimo Viola
- General Surgery Unit, Cardinale Panico Hospital, Tricase, LE, Italy
| | - Giacomo Ruffo
- General Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, VR, Italy
| | - Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale "C. E G. Mazzoni", ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Patriti A, Baiocchi GL, Catena F, Marini P, Catarci M. Emergency general surgery in Italy during the COVID-19 outbreak: first survey from the real life. World J Emerg Surg 2020; 15:36. [PMID: 32448333 PMCID: PMC7245630 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-020-00314-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 pandemic has rapidly spread in Italy in late February 2020. Almost all surgical services have been reorganized, with the aim of maintaining an adequate therapeutic path, especially for surgical emergencies. The knowledge of how surgeons dealing with emergency surgery have reacted to the epidemic in the real life can be useful while drafting clinical recommendations. METHODS Surgeons from multiple Italian regions were invited answering to an online survey in order to make a snapshot of their current behaviors towards COVID-19-positive patients bearing urgent surgical diseases. Questions about institutional rules and personal approach for patient treatment and to limit epidemic spread were included in a 37-item questionnaire. RESULTS Seventy-one questionnaires from institutions dealing with emergency surgery were accepted. Participating surgeons were equally subdivided from a geographical point of view, with a large proportion of public (97.2%) and non-academical (91.5%) centers. In 80.3% of cases, the hospitals treated COVID-19 patients; in 69.1% of centers, a change in work plan was necessary, and 33.8% of teams had almost a surgeon infected or in preventive quarantine. The vast majority of surgeons operated only on urgent cases (73.9%), but the number of interventions significantly dropped. Up to 40% of non-traumatic abdominal emergency cases had an unusual delayed treatment. The laparoscopic approach was used in 69.6% of interventions on COVID-19 patients. Strategies to protect health care workers against COVID-19 infection and to identify asymptomatic infected surgeons were suboptimal with respect to the WHO recommendations in 70.4% and 90.2% of centers, respectively. Advanced personal protective equipment for operating room workers was adopted for all surgeries in only 12.7% of centers. DISCUSSION This survey confirms that the COVID-19 outbreak is dramatically changing the practice of emergency surgery centers in Italy. Despite the reduction in number, urgent cases were on average more challenging owing to diagnostic delay. Recommendations from the International Scientific Societies are frequently not complied concerning the use of laparoscopic approach, the availability of personal protective equipment in the operating rooms, and the testing of both asymptomatic physicians and patients scheduled for surgery. A further evaluation of the short-term results of these attitudes is warranted to modulate international recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Patriti
- Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Marche Nord, Ospedale San Salvatore, Piazzale Cinelli 1, Pesaro-Fano, Italy.
| | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Pierluigi Marini
- General Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Roma, Italy
| | - Marco Catarci
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale "C. e G. Mazzoni", ASUR Marche AV5, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ficari F, Borghi F, Catarci M, Scatizzi M, Alagna V, Bachini I, Baldazzi G, Bardi U, Benedetti M, Beretta L, Bertocchi E, Caliendo D, Campagnacci R, Cardinali A, Carlini M, Cascella M, Cassini D, Ciotti S, Cirio A, Coata P, Conti D, DelRio P, Di Marco C, Ferla L, Fiorindi C, Garulli G, Genzano C, Guercioni G, Marra B, Maurizi A, Monzani R, Pace U, Pandolfini L, Parisi A, Pavanello M, Pecorelli N, Pellegrino L, Persiani R, Pirozzi F, Pirrera B, Rizzo A, Rolfo M, Romagnoli S, Ruffo G, Sciuto A, Marini P. Enhanced recovery pathways in colorectal surgery: a consensus paper by the Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI) and the PeriOperative Italian Society (POIS). G Chir 2019; 40:1-40. [PMID: 32003714 DOI: pmid/32003714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway is a multi-disciplinary, patient-centered protocol relying on the implementation of the best evidence-based perioperative practice. In the field of colorectal surgery, the application of ERAS programs is associated with up to 50% reduction of morbidity rates and up to 2.5 days reduction of postoperative hospital stay. However, widespread adoption of ERAS pathways is still yet to come, mainly because of the lack of proper information and communication. Purpose of this paper is to support the diffusion of ERAS pathways through a critical review of the existing evidence by members of the two national societies dealing with ERAS pathways in Italy, the PeriOperative Italian Society (POIS) and the Associazione Italiana Chirurghi Ospedalieri (ACOI), showing the results of a consensus development conference held at Matera, Italy, during the national ACOI Congress on June 10, 2019.
Collapse
|
25
|
De Franco L, Marrelli D, Morgagni P, Degiuli M, Giacopuzzi S, Orsenigo E, Pacelli F, Fumagalli U, Baiocchi G, Del Rio P, Catarci M, Marchet A, Mura G, Bencivenga M, Rosa F, Saragoni L, Quagliuolo V, Roviello F. Clinicopathological features and time trends of three subtypes of gastric cancer: Upper intestinal, lower intestinal and diffuse. Analysis of the GIRCG database on 5606 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
26
|
Catarci M, Berlanda M, Grassi GB, Masedu F, Guadagni S. Pancreatic enzyme supplementation after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Gastric Cancer 2018; 21:542-551. [PMID: 28804801 PMCID: PMC5906500 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-017-0757-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrectomy for gastric cancer is a significant cause of secondary exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy may influence nutritional status and quality of life after gastrectomy, but the pertinent clinical research to date remains controversial. A randomized controlled trial to test this hypothesis was carried out. METHODS After gastrectomy, 43 patients with gastric cancer were randomly assigned to a normal diet (Normal-d; n = 21) or to a pancreatic enzyme supplementation diet (PES-d; n = 22) and were followed up during a 12-month period, assessing nutritional status and quality of life through body mass index (BMI), instant nutritional assessment (INA) class status, serum pre-albumin (SPA) values, and GastroiIntestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). RESULTS BMI was not significantly influenced by the type of diet; INA class status was significantly improved in the PES-d arm, particularly during the first 3 months after gastrectomy; SPA levels increased in both arms at 6 months after gastrectomy, reaching significantly higher values in the PES-d arm at 12 months. GIQLI was not significantly influenced by the type of diet throughout the follow-up period; however, this index significantly improved in the PES-d arm between the first and third month after gastrectomy. CONCLUSIONS PES-d improves nutritional status and quality of life after gastrectomy for gastric cancer, particularly within 3 months from the operation. A larger, multicenter trial is necessary to address the potential influence of several confounding variables such as disease stage and adjuvant treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Oncology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.
- Direttore UOC Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale "C. e G. Mazzoni", AV5-ASUR Marche, Via degli Iris, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy.
| | - Manuele Berlanda
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Oncology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Masedu
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Stefano Guadagni
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Capelli L, Petracci E, Quagliuolo V, Saragoni L, Colombo P, Morgagni P, Calistri D, Tomezzoli A, Di Cosmo M, Roviello F, Vindigni C, Coniglio A, Villanacci V, Catarci M, Coppola L, Alfieri S, Ricci R, Capella C, Rausei S, Gulino D, Amadori D, Ulivi P. Gastric GISTs: Analysis of c-Kit, PDGFRA and BRAF mutations in relation to prognosis and clinical pathological characteristics of patients – A GIRCG study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:1206-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2016] [Revised: 04/28/2016] [Accepted: 05/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
|
28
|
Balla A, Mancini S, Catarci M, Costantino A, Grassi GB. Retroperitoneal Hemangiopericytoma in a young woman. Case report and literature review. Ann Ital Chir 2016; 87:S2239253X16025792. [PMID: 27469985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Hemangiopericytoma (HPC) is a primary tumor with mesenchymal vascular origin that represents 1% of all vascular neoplasm. HPC develops from the Zimmerman's pericytes around capillaries venules and it is possible to observe it frequently in the extremities, pelvis, retroperitoneum, head, neck and meninges. The only definitive parameter of malignancy is the development of recurrence or distant metastases. This report describes a case of symptomatic retroperitoneal HPC in a young female patient treated by surgical complete removal of the mass, and literature review. Despite the relatively simple surgical management of retroperitoneal Hemangiopericytoma, its diagnosis still remains difficult and often is incidentally. Patients should undergo a close long-term follow up, by periodic CT scan, due to the high probability of local recurrence or distant metastases that can occur also many years after surgery. KEY WORDS Hemangiopericytoma (HPC), Retroperitoneum, Surgery.
Collapse
|
29
|
Catarci M, Montemurro LA, Di Cintio A, Ghinassi S, Coppola L, Pinnarelli L, Belardi A, Koch M, Grassi GB. Lymph node retrieval and examination during the implementation of extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer in a non-specialized western institution. Updates Surg 2016; 62:89-99. [PMID: 20845010 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-010-0017-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The optimal degree of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer is still matter of debate. Particularly, there are serious doubts about the reproducibility of extended lymph node dissection in western surgical units, and no studies to date have investigated factors influencing lymph node retrieval and examination during the learning curve. Univariate and multivariate retrospective analysis of 21 variables were carried out on a prospective series of 313 consecutive resections for gastric cancer performed by ten different surgeons, with lymph node retrieval and analysis performed by ten different pathologists. Endpoints were number of examined lymph nodes per patient, number of cases with inadequate nodal staging (<15 examined lymph nodes) and lymph node ratio (calculated as the absolute ratio between the number of metastatic and the number of examined lymph nodes). The number of examined lymph nodes per patient (mean ± SD 28.3 ± 14.1, median 26, range 2-78) was independently influenced by age, pN status, the type of gastric resection, the degree of lymph node dissection and single pathologist. There were 47 cases (15.0%) with incomplete nodal staging that was independently determined by the degree of lymph node dissection and by the pathologist. Lymph node ratio was independently influenced by the number of metastatic lymph nodes, the disease stage and by the histological subtype of the tumor. The role of an experienced or dedicated pathologist should not be underevaluated in western series when dealing with lymph node retrieval and examination. Lymph node ratio appeared not to be significantly influenced by the number of examined lymph nodes, being independently influenced only by the number of metastatic lymph nodes, the disease stage and by the histological subtype of the tumor. It could be therefore tested as a prognostic factor limiting the stage-migration phenomenon induced by extended lymph node dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- Department of Surgery, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Condino G, Aratari A, Papi C, Catarci M. Gastrointestinal bleeding and severe anaemia: An uncommon presentation of small bowel carcinoma complicating ileal Crohn's disease. Dig Liver Dis 2015. [PMID: 26205829 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Claudio Papi
- Gastroenterology Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | - Marco Catarci
- Department of Surgery, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Il tema dell'integrazione dei migranti e dei rifugiati rappresenta una rilevante emergenza sociale e formativa del nostro tempo. Tale questione impone una riflessione critica sulla nozione di integrazione sociale. Lo studio delle forme di inclusione dei migranti nella società impone, infatti, di "ribaltare" la questione dell'integrazione sociale, che viene solitamente declinata "a senso unico" in prospettiva assimilazionista come semplice inserimento, e rappresenta la cartina di tornasole per comprendere quale risposta si è in grado di offrire di fronte a quei processi globali che causano la dissoluzione, la disgregazione sociale e l'impoverimento di intere aree del pianeta.
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
Catarci M, Papi C. Early versus delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 2006; 21:488. [PMID: 17103285 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9006-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2006] [Accepted: 04/15/2006] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
34
|
Montemurro L, Catarci M, Bellotti A, Piccirillo R, Battaglia B, Viarengo MA, Ricca L, Grassi GB. [Gastric hemangiopericytoma: unusual neoplasia but not always benign]. Suppl Tumori 2005; 4:S82. [PMID: 16437918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- L Montemurro
- UOC di Chirurgia Generale ed Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliera San Filippo Neri, Roma
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Montemurro L, Catarci M, Mancini S, Bellotti A, Piccirillo R, Battaglia B, Viarengo MA, Ricca L, Grassi GB. [Metastatic malignant melanoma of the pancreas: which strategy?]. Suppl Tumori 2005; 4:S64. [PMID: 16437908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- L Montemurro
- UOC di Chirurgia Generale ed Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliera San Filippo Neri, Roma
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cosentino LM, Ciabattoni A, Bellotti AM, Catarci M, Belardi A, Mancini S, Ciccone V, Grassi GB. [Contribution of intraoperative radiotherapy in the control of local recurrences of rectal cancer]. Suppl Tumori 2005; 4:S12. [PMID: 16437874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Local recurrence (LR) is a major problem following curative resection of rectal cancer. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is considered an ideal boost technique for increasing the dose of radiation therapy within a restricted area without introducing a significant toxicity. The aim of this study is to present the results of a multimodality treatment containing external beam irradiation, chemotherapy, surgical resection, and IORT delivered by a movable linear accelerator (NOVAC7, Hitesys SpA, Italia), employed in a "traditional" operating room.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Marino Cosentino
- Unità Operativa Complessa di Chirurgia Generale, Azienda Complesso Ospedaliero San Filippo Neri, Roma
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To highlight the current available evidence in antireflux surgery through a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Laparoscopic fundoplication is currently suggested as the gold standard for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, but many controversies are still open concerning the influence of some technical details on its results. METHODS Papers related to RCTs identified via a systematic literature search were evaluated according to standard criteria. Data regarding the patient sample, study methods, and outcomes were abstracted and summarized across studies. Defined outcomes were examined for 41 papers published from 1974 to 2002 related to 25 RCTs. A meta-analysis was performed pooling the results as odds ratios (OR), rate differences (RD), and number needed to treat (NNT). Data given as mean and/or median values were pooled as a mean +/- SD (SD). RESULTS No perioperative deaths were found in any of the RCTs. Immediate results showed a significantly lower operative morbidity rate (10.3% versus 26.7%, OR 0.33, RD -12%, NNT 8), shorter postoperative stay (3.1 versus 5.2 days, P = 0.03), and shorter sick leave (20.1 versus 35.8 days, P = 0.03) for laparoscopic versus open fundoplication. No significant differences were found regarding the incidence of recurrence, dysphagia, bloating, and reoperation for failure at midterm follow-up. No significant differences in operative morbidity (13.1% versus 9.4%) and in operative time (90.2 versus 84.2 minutes) were found in partial versus total fundoplication. A significantly lower incidence of reoperation for failure (1.6% versus 9.6%, OR 0.21, RD -7%, NNT 14) was found after partial fundoplication, with no significant differences regarding the incidence of recurrence and/or dysphagia. Routine division of short gastric vessels during total fundoplication showed no significant advantages regarding the incidence of postoperative dysphagia and recurrence when compared with no division. The use of ultrasonic scalpel compared with clips or bipolar cautery for the division of short gastric vessels showed no significant effect on operative time, postoperative complications, and costs. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is at least as safe and as effective as its open counterpart, with reduced morbidity, shortened postoperative stay, and sick leave. Partial fundoplication significantly reduces the risk of reoperations for failure over total fundoplication. Routine versus no division of short gastric vessels showed no significant advantages. A word of caution is needed when implementing these results derived from RCTs performed in specialized centers into everyday clinical practice, where experience and skills may be suboptimal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- Department of Surgery, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Catarci M, Mancini S, Gentileschi P, Camplone C, Sileri P, Grassi GB. Antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lack of need or lack of evidence? Surg Endosc 2004; 18:638-41. [PMID: 14752639 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9090-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2003] [Accepted: 08/02/2003] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need to administer antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is still a matter of significant controversy. The purpose of this study was to resolve this issue by performing a meta-analysis of the available randomized controlled trials (RCT) on this topic. METHODS Papers identified via a systematic literature search were evaluated according to standard criteria. Data regarding the patient sample, study methods, and outcomes were abstracted and summarized across studies. The outcome measures were the rates of all perioperative infections, the rates of surgical site infections, and the rates of infections at other sites. Results were examined for 974 patients randomized to ABP or placebo prior to LC in six RCT published from 1997 to 2001. RESULTS The cumulative rates of all infections were 2.8% in the ABP group and 4.4% in the placebo group. The pooled odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 0.69 (0.34-1.43; p = 0.32). The cumulative rates of surgical site infections were 2.1% in the ABP group and 2.9% in the placebo group. The pooled OR (95% CI) was 0.82 (0.36-1.86; p = 0.63). The cumulative rates of infections at other sites were 0.7% in the ABP group and 1.5% in the placebo group. Pooled OR (95% CI) was 0.82 (0.18-1.90; p = 0.37). No significant heterogeneity was found in any data pooling. CONCLUSIONS Based on the available evidence, there appears to be no need to administer routine ABP to low-risk patients during LC. However, the number of patients enrolled to date into RCT is insufficient to avoid a type II error. A large and well-designed trial is urgently needed to find a conclusive answer to this question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Catarci
- Department of Surgery, San Filippo Neri Hospital, 20 Via G. Martinotti, 00135, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare early with delayed cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute lithiasic cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials. METHODS Pertinent studies were selected from the Medline, Embase, Cancerlit, HealthSTAR and Cochrane Library Databases, references from published articles, and reviews. Twelve prospective randomized trials (9 addressing open cholecystectomy and 3 laparoscopic cholecystectomy) were selected. Conventional meta-analysis according to the DerSimonian and Laird method was used for the pooling of the results. The rate difference (RD) (95% CI) and the number needed to treat (NNT) were used as a measure of the therapeutic effect. RESULTS Cumulative operative and perioperative mortality and morbidity were 0.9% and 17.8%, respectively, for open cholecystectomy and 0% and 13.1%, respectively, for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The pooled RD for operative complications in early surgery was 1.37% (95% CI =-3.78% to 6.53%; p= 0.2) for open cholecystectomy and 3.11% (95% CI =-15.10% to 8.87%; p= 0.6) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy the cumulative conversion rate to open cholecystectomy was 21.5%. The pooled RD for conversion rate in early laparoscopic cholecystectomy was -7.99% (95% CI =-18.46% to 2.47%; p= 0.1; NNT = 13). Total hospital stay (mean +/- SD) was significantly shorter in the early surgery group (9.6 +/- 2.5 days vs 17.8 +/- 5.8 days; p < 0.0001). More than 20% of patients referred to delayed surgery fail to respond to conservative management or suffer recurrent cholecystitis in the interval period. CONCLUSIONS Early operation (open or laparoscopic) does not carry a higher risk of mortality and morbidity compared to delayed operation and should be the preferred surgical approach for patients with acute lithiasic cholecystitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Papi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine General Surgery Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Gentileschi P, Di Paola M, Catarci M, Santoro E, Montemurro L, Carlini M, Nanni E, Alessandroni L, Angeloni R, Benini B, Cristini F, Dalla Torre A, De Stefano C, Gatto A, Gossetti F, Manfroni S, Mascagni P, Masoni L, Montalto G, Polito D, Puce E, Silecchia G, Terenzi A, Valle M, Vita S, Zanarini T. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a 1994-2001 audit on 13,718 operations in the area of Rome. Surg Endosc 2003; 18:232-6. [PMID: 14691705 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8815-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2003] [Accepted: 07/29/2003] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bile duct injuries (BDIs) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) still are reported with greater frequency than during open cholecystectomy (OC). METHODS In 1999, a retrospective study evaluating the incidence of BDIs during LC in the area of Rome from 1994 to 1998 (group A) was performed. In addition, a prospective audit was started, ending in December 2001 (group B). RESULTS In group A, 6,419 LCs were performed (222 were converted to OC; 3.4%). In group B, 7,299 LCs were performed (225 were converted to OC; 3.1%). Seventeen BDIs (0.26%) occurred in group A and 16 (0.22%) in group B. Overall, mortality and major morbidity rates were 12.1% and 30.3%, respectively, without significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The incidence and clinical relevance of BDIs during LC in the area of Rome appeared to be stable over the past 8 years and were not influenced by the use of a prospective audit, as compared with a retrospective survey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Gentileschi
- Lap Group Roma, Gruppo Laparoscopico Romano, Via A. Borelli 5, 00161 Roma, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Catarci M, Carlini M, Gentileschi P, Santoro E, Pasquini G, Silecchia G, Ferretti G, Masciangelo R, Mancini S. [Antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from empiricism to evidence. Review of the problem and proposal of a randomized trial of the Lap Group Roma]. Chir Ital 2003; 55:649-56. [PMID: 14587108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
More than 10 years after its appearance in clinical practice, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can now be considered the standard operation for gallstone disease. However, some aspects of this operation are still debated. The need to perform routine antibiotic prophylaxis in order to reduce the incidence of infectious complications is still a matter of controversy. International guidelines do not recommend its routine use. The evidence for this, however, is rather limited, because there are no randomized trials with a sufficient number of cases to avoid a type II error. The authors, on behalf of the Lap Group Roma, introduce the protocol of a multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trial designed to find a definitive answer to this problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Catarci
- UOC Chirurgia Generale e Oncologica, ACO San Filippo Neri, Via G. Martinotti, 20, 00135 Roma.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Grassi GB, Catarci M. [Specialization, volume of treated cases, and results of colorectal cancer surgery]. G Chir 2003; 24:165-9. [PMID: 12945165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
|
43
|
Gentileschi P, Kini S, Catarci M, Gagner M. Evidence-based medicine: open and laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 2002; 16:736-44. [PMID: 11997813 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-8239-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2001] [Accepted: 09/13/2001] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to perform an evidence-based analysis of the literature on open and laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity. METHODS Human studies on surgery for morbid obesity were conducted. Multiple publications of the same studies, abstracts, and case reports were reviewed. Current Contents, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were investigated. RESULTS Open Roux-en-Y gastric by pass (RYGB) for morbidly obese patients and long-limb RYGB for superobese patients are highly effective procedures. Randomized controlled trials comparing malabsorptive procedures with other bariatric operations are needed. The long-term efficacy of adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) still is undetermined because of poor evidence. Laparoscopic RYGB is as safe as its open counterpart, although its long-term results are lacking. Laparoscopic ASGB is less invasive than open ASGB, although its efficacy cannot be determined because of poor evidence. Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is becoming unpopular since the decreasing trend of open VBG. Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch is feasible, but needs further studies. CONCLUSIONS Randomized controlled trials comparing the various laparoscopic operations are strongly needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Gentileschi
- Division of Laparoscopic Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 19 East 98 Street, Suite 5a, # 1103, New York, 10029, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Catarci M, Carlini M, Gentileschi P, Santoro E. Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum. A multicenter study on 12,919 cases. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:566-9. [PMID: 11591941 DOI: 10.1007/s004640000381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lap Group Roma was established in 1999 to promote and control the development of laparoscopic surgery in the area of Rome and its province. Complications during the creation of pneumoperitoneum were given a high priority of investigation, and a retrospective enquiry was immediately carried out. METHODS A questionnaire about all laparoscopic surgical practice performed from January 1994 to December 1998 was sent to the supervisors of 28 centers of general surgery in the area of Rome and its province participating to the Lap Group Roma, requesting demographics, type of procedure for the creation of pneumoperitoneum, type and timing of operation, and major vascular, visceral, and minor vascular injuries related to the creation of pneumoperitoneum. RESULTS The questionnaire was returned by 57% of the centers, for a total of 12,919 laparoscopic procedures. The type of procedure used to create the pneumoperitoneum involved a standard closed approach (Veress needle + first trocar) in 82% of the cases, an open (Hasson) approach in 9% of the cases, and the use of an optical trocar in 9% of the cases. There were seven major vascular injuries (0.05%), eight visceral lesions (0.06%), and nine minor vascular lesions (0.07%), for an overall morbility of 0.18%. There was no death related to these complications. The rate of complications differed significantly (p < 0.0001) depending on the type of approach used. It was 0.27% with the optical trocar (3 of 1,009 cases), 0.18% with the closed approach (20 of 10,664 cases), and 0.09% with the open approach (1 of 1,135 cases). CONCLUSIONS There is no foolproof technique for the creation of pneumoperitoneum, and this inquiry confirms the need of a constant search for prevention and early treatment of complications encountered during this obligatory phase of any laparoscopic approach. A well-conducted and prolonged prospective audit of clinical practice could help in identifying the risk factors that can make an alternative approach (open or video controlled) preferable to the widely used closed approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Catarci
- Lap Group Roma, Gruppo Laparoscopico Romano, Via A. Borelli, 5, 00161 Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Catarci M, Zaraca F, Angeloni R, Mancini B, de Filippo MG, Massa R, Carboni M, Pasquini G. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph node biopsy in papillary thyroid cancer. A pilot study. J Surg Oncol 2001; 77:21-4; discussion 25. [PMID: 11344476 DOI: 10.1002/jso.1058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Lymphadenectomy for papillary thyroid cancer is a matter of debate. After showing its usefulness as a prognostic factor in both melanoma and breast cancer, the concept of sentinel lymph node biopsy was also recently applied to differentiated thyroid cancer. To date, all attempts to locate and remove the sentinel node were based on the intraoperative injection of a vital dye. The feasibility and the technical details of using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy coupled with intraoperative vital dye and gamma probe scanning were investigated and discussed. METHODS Six patients diagnosed with papillary thyroid cancer were submitted to preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with (99m)Tc-labelled colloidal albumin at different dosages. The operation consisted in a total thyroidectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy guided by intraoperative injection of a vital dye (Blu Patent V, 2.5%) and scanning with a hand-held gamma probe. Lymph node dissection was completed in the area in which the sentinel node was located. RESULTS The sentinel node was identified using all the three methods in all cases (100%). Considering one of the methods alone, identification rates were 66, 50, and 83% for preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, vital dye, and probe scanning, respectively. One sentinel node was identified in four cases and two in the other two cases. The optimal dosage of the tracer appeared to be at 22 MBq. CONCLUSIONS These results underline the necessity to use the combination of nuclear medicine imaging and lymphatic vital dye in order to enhance the identification rate of sentinel node also in thyroid cancer. It is now necessary to check the diagnostic accuracy of this procedure through a controlled trial involving a more extended lymph node dissection in the neck.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Catarci
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of Velletri, University of Rome "La Sapienza" Medical School, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Guadagni S, de Manzoni G, Catarci M, Valenti M, Amicucci G, De Bernardinis G, Cordiano C, Carboni M, Maruyama K. Evaluation of the Maruyama computer program accuracy for preoperative estimation of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer. World J Surg 2000; 24:1550-8. [PMID: 11193722 DOI: 10.1007/s002680010276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Controversy still exists about the optimal lymph node (LN) dissection for potentially curable gastric cancer. For rational LN dissection it is important to know the incidence of metastasis at each LN station. For this purpose a computer program was developed using data from 4302 primary gastric cancers treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Tokyo between 1969 and 1989. To evaluate the accuracy of the computer program, the differences between the individual reports generated by the computer and the stored data were investigated in 282 Italian patients submitted to curative gastrectomy and D2 or more extended LN dissections for gastric cancer. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the program for predicting LN metastases in each of the 16 regional LN stations. The computer program showed good predictive ability for LN metastases in most of the 16 LN stations, as the areas under the curve ranged from 0.741 (station 15) to 0.944 (station 8), with a mean of 0.856. A critical cutoff point of 18% of the program's expected percentage was the value maximizing the validity of the prediction. Using an "absolute" cutoff point of 0%, the overall rate of false-negative (FN) predictions in 176 N+ patients was 11.9%; of these, 11 (6.2%) were absolute FNs, in which the program totally failed to estimate LN metastases; the remaining 10 cases (5.7%) were relative FNs because the specific prediction was positive for a different depth of stomach invasion. The low number of D3/D4 lymph-adenectomies in the historical database may affect the low estimate of metastases to N3/N4 nodes generated by the program. Based on these data, the program predicts with good accuracy the extent of LN metastases from gastric cancer, but it is not recommended for directing the surgeon to perform more extensive lymphadenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Guadagni
- Department of Surgery, University of L'Aquila, Coppito, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Zaraca F, Di Paola M, Gossetti F, Catarci M, Trentino P, Proposito D, Filippoussis P, Talarico E, Cerasoli V, Talarico C, Montemurro L, Carboni M. [Acute biliary pancreatitis. Role of laparoscopy after 30 years of traditional surgery experience]. Ann Ital Chir 1999; 70:705-11. [PMID: 10692791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
The authors herein show their own experience in the treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis. Aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of the "early" laparoscopic approach to the mild to moderate acute biliary pancreatitis. The authors studied sixty cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative colangiography for acute biliary pancreatitis (M/F 1:1.2; mean age 59.6 yrs, range 29.79). The patients were divided in two groups on the basis of the severity of the pancreatitis, defined through Ranson's score and Balthazar classification. The mortality rate was nil. Intraoperative morbidity rate was 6.6% in the group I (3/45), and 13.3% in the group II (2/15). Postoperative morbidity rate was 6.7% (3/45) in the group I and 40% in the group II (6/15). The authors show an original diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for the treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy with I.O.C. is proposed as the gold standard treatment for mild to moderate acute biliary pancreatitis. This approach appears to be effective and safe in their experience. In case of severe acute biliary pancreatitis, further investigations are mandatory to evaluate the role of laparoscopic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Zaraca
- Divisione di Chirurgia Generale, Università di Roma La Sapienza
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Guadagni S, Maruyama K, Sano T, Kinoshita T, Marsili L, Valenti M, Gola P, Catarci M, Altobelli E, de Bernardinis G, Carboni M. Pre-operative angiography in gastric cancer surgery with extended lymphadenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 1999; 46:2701-9. [PMID: 10522068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS The value of pre-operative angiographic evaluation in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery with extended lymphadenectomy was assessed in a prospective study comparing exposed and unexposed groups of patients. METHODOLOGY During the period from July 1991 to October 1997, 76 patients (Group A--exposed) were pre-operatively submitted to a digital subtraction angiography (DSA) after informed consent. Concurrently, 94 patients (Group B--unexposed) were included as an unexposed reference group. All patients underwent total or subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy according to the guidelines proposed by the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (JRSGC). RESULTS In 34 (45%) exposed patients (Group A), DSA detected an atypical vascular anatomy. Major anatomical variations of the celiac axis, its branches and the superior mesenteric artery were discovered in 4 subjects (5%). Vascular anomalies affecting the surgical tactics of lymphadenectomy were detected in less than 8% of patients. Five post-operative deaths (6.6%) were registered between patients of the Group A, exposed to pre-operative angiography, 8 in the unexposed Group B (8.5%). Post-operative morbidity was significantly higher (P = 0.038) in the Group B (34%) in comparison to Group A (20%) but no difference in risk of individual complications was detected. CONCLUSIONS Although useful in the presence of major vascular anomalies, it appears that pre-operative angiography did not significantly reduce intra- and post-operative complications associated with radical gastrectomy combined with extended lymphadenectomy. Arteriography is therefore not routinely recommendable but its use is mandatory in specific operations for gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Guadagni
- Department of Surgery, University of L'Aquila, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Catarci M, Zaraca F, Mulieri G, Di Paola M, Montemurro L, Filippoussis P, Greco E, Gossetti F, Carboni M. [Routine use of open laparoscopy: technique and results in 1006 consecutive cases]. Chir Ital 1999; 51:151-8. [PMID: 10514931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
Blind insertion of the Veress needle and/or the first trocar is one of the most frequent causes of laparoscopic surgery complications. Nevertheless, the closed technique is still more preferred than the open one. The Authors retrospectively analyzed 1006 consecutive laparoscopic procedures in which Hasson's technique was routinely utilized. The overall complication rate was 2.2%, but the vast majority of complications occurred during the learning curve (6% vs. 1.9%). The Authors conclude that after the first 50 cases the open technique is a quick and safe procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Catarci
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Azienda Complesso Ospedaliero S. Filippo Neri, Roma
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Blind insertion of the Veress needle and of the first trocar is a significant cause of laparoscopic surgery complications. Despite this risk, the closed technique is still more popular than the open one. The authors retrospectively evaluated 1006 consecutive laparoscopic operations in which Hasson's technique was routinely performed. The overall complication rate was 2.2%, but the vast majority of complications occurred during the first 50 cases (6% vs. 1.9%). They conclude that after a learning phase of about 50 cases, Hasson's technique is a quick and safe procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Zaraca
- Second Surgical Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|