Differentiation of atypical pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: Using whole-tumor CT texture analysis as quantitative biomarkers

Differentiating small (< 2 cm) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from neuroendocrine tumors with multiparametric MRI-based radiomic features

OBJECTIVES

To assess MR-based radiomic analysis in preoperatively discriminating small (< 2 cm) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) from neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).

METHODS

A total of 197 patients (146 in the training cohort, 51 in the validation cohort) from two centers were retrospectively collected. A total of 7338 radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, T1-weighted, arterial phase, portal venous phase and delayed phase imaging. The optimal features were selected by the Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's rank correlation test and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method and used to construct the radiomic score (Rad-score). Conventional radiological and clinical features were also assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to construct a radiological model, a radiomic model and a fusion model.

RESULTS

Nine optimal features were identified and used to build the Rad-score. The radiomic model based on the Rad-score achieved satisfactory results with AUCs of 0.905 and 0.930, sensitivities of 0.780 and 0.800, specificities of 0.906 and 0.952 and accuracies of 0.836 and 0.863 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The fusion model, incorporating CA19-9, tumor margins, pancreatic duct dilatation and the Rad-score, exhibited the best performance with AUCs of 0.977 and 0.941, sensitivities of 0.914 and 0.852, specificities of 0.954 and 0.950, and accuracies of 0.932 and 0.894 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The MR-based Rad-score is a novel image biomarker for discriminating small PDACs from PNETs. A fusion model combining radiomic, radiological and clinical features performed very well in differentially diagnosing these two tumors.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

A fusion model combining MR-based radiomic, radiological, and clinical features could help differentiate between small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

KEY POINTS

Preoperatively differentiating small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is challenging. Multiparametric MRI-based Rad-score can be used for discriminating small PDACs from PNETs. A fusion model incorporating radiomic, radiological, and clinical features differentiated small PDACs from PNETs well.

Pancreatic Cancer and Its Mimics

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common primary pancreatic malignancy, ranking fourth in cancer-related mortality in the United States. Typically, PDAC appears on images as a hypovascular mass with upstream pancreatic duct dilatation and abrupt duct cutoff, distal pancreatic atrophy, and vascular encasement, with metastatic involvement including lymphadenopathy. However, atypical manifestations that may limit detection of the underlying PDAC may also occur. Atypical PDAC features include findings related to associated conditions such as acute or chronic pancreatitis, a mass that is isointense to the parenchyma, multiplicity, diffuse tumor infiltration, associated calcifications, and cystic components. Several neoplastic and inflammatory conditions can mimic PDAC, such as paraduodenal "groove" pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis, focal acute and chronic pancreatitis, neuroendocrine tumors, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, metastases, and lymphoma. Differentiation of these conditions from PDAC can be challenging due to overlapping CT and MRI features; however, certain findings can help in differentiation. Diffusion-weighted MRI can be helpful but also can be nonspecific. Accurate diagnosis is pivotal for guiding therapeutic planning and potential outcomes in PDAC and avoiding biopsy or surgical treatment of some of these mimics. Biopsy may still be required for diagnosis in some cases. The authors describe the typical and atypical imaging findings of PDAC and features that may help to differentiate PDAC from its mimics. ©RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Zins in this issue.

Avoid non-diagnostic EUS-FNA: a DNN model as a possible gatekeeper to distinguish pancreatic lesions prone to inconclusive biopsy

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to explore the utility of CT radiomics with machine learning for distinguishing the pancreatic lesions prone to non-diagnostic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA).

METHODS

498 patients with pancreatic EUS-FNA were retrospectively reviewed [Development cohort: 147 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); Validation cohort: 37 PDAC]. Pancreatic lesions not PDAC were also tested exploratively. Radiomics extracted from contrast-enhanced CT was integrated with deep neural networks (DNN) after dimension reduction. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed for model evaluation. And, the explainability of the DNN model was analyzed by integrated gradients.

RESULTS

The DNN model was effective in distinguishing PDAC lesions prone to non-diagnostic EUS-FNA (Development cohort: AUC = 0.821, 95% CI: 0.742-0.900; Validation cohort: AUC = 0.745, 95% CI: 0.534-0.956). In all cohorts, the DNN model showed better utility than the logistic model based on traditional lesion characteristics with NRI >0 (p < 0.05). And, the DNN model had net benefits of 21.6% at the risk threshold of 0.60 in the validation cohort. As for the model explainability, gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features contributed the most averagely and the first-order features were the most important in the sum attribution.

CONCLUSION

The CT radiomics-based DNN model can be a useful auxiliary tool for distinguishing the pancreatic lesions prone to nondiagnostic EUS-FNA and provide alerts for endoscopists preoperatively to reduce unnecessary EUS-FNA.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This is the first investigation into the utility of CT radiomics-based machine learning in avoiding non-diagnostic EUS-FNA for patients with pancreatic masses and providing potential pre-operative assistance for endoscopists.

A Machine Learning Approach Using [18F]FDG PET-Based Radiomics for Prediction of Tumor Grade and Prognosis in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor

PURPOSE

We sought to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for predicting tumor grade and prognosis using 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-based radiomics and clinical features in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).

PROCEDURES

A total of 58 patients with PNETs who underwent pretherapeutic [18F]FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) were retrospectively enrolled. PET-based radiomics extracted from segmented tumor and clinical features were selected to develop prediction models by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator feature selection method. The predictive performances of ML models using neural network (NN) and random forest algorithms were compared by the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) and validated by stratified five-fold cross validation.

RESULTS

We developed two separate ML models for predicting high-grade tumors (Grade 3) and tumors with poor prognosis (disease progression within two years). The integrated models consisting of clinical and radiomic features with NN algorithm showed the best performances than the other models (stand-alone clinical or radiomics models). The performance metrics of the integrated model by NN algorithm were AUROC of 0.864 in the tumor grade prediction model and AUROC of 0.830 in the prognosis prediction model. In addition, AUROC of the integrated clinico-radiomics model with NN was significantly higher than that of tumor maximum standardized uptake model in predicting prognosis (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of clinical features and [18F]FDG PET-based radiomics using ML algorithms improved the prediction of high-grade PNET and poor prognosis in a non-invasive manner.

Prognostic Assessment of Gastropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm: Prospects and Limits of Radiomics

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of lesions originating from cells of the diffuse neuroendocrine system. NENs may involve different sites, including the gastrointestinal tract (GEP-NENs). The incidence and prevalence of GEP-NENs has been constantly rising thanks to the increased diagnostic power of imaging and immuno-histochemistry. Despite the plethora of biochemical markers and imaging techniques, the prognosis and therapeutic choice in GEP-NENs still represents a challenge, mainly due to the great heterogeneity in terms of tumor lesions and clinical behavior. The concept that biomedical images contain information about tissue heterogeneity and pathological processes invisible to the human eye is now well established. From this substrate comes the idea of radiomics. Computational analysis has achieved promising results in several oncological settings, and the use of radiomics in different types of GEP-NENs is growing in the field of research, yet with conflicting results. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive update on the role of radiomics on GEP-NEN management, focusing on the main clinical aspects analyzed by most existing reports: predicting tumor grade, distinguishing NET from other tumors, and prognosis assessment.

Research advances and treatment perspectives of pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma

BACKGROUND

As a malignant tumor, pancreatic cancer has an extremely low overall 5-year survival rate. Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC), a rare pancreatic malignancy, owns clinical presentation similar to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is the most prevalent pancreatic cancer subtype. PASC is generally defined as a pancreatic tumor consisting mainly of adenocarcinoma tissue and squamous carcinoma tissue. Compared with PDAC, PASC has a higher metastatic potential and worse prognosis, and lacks of effective treatment options to date. However, the pathogenesis and treatment of PASC are not yet clear and are accompanied with difficulties.

CONCLUSION

The present paper systematically summarizes the possible pathogenesis, diagnosis methods, and further suggests potential new treatment directions through reviewing research results of PASC, including the clinical manifestations, pathological manifestation, the original hypothesis of squamous carcinoma and the potential regulatory mechanism. In short, the present paper provides a systematic review of the research progress and new ideas for the development mechanism and treatment of PASC.

Radiomics: Status quo and future challenges

Noninvasive imaging (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasonography, and positron emission tomography) as an important part of the clinical workflow in the clinic, but it still provides limited information for diagnosis, treatment effect evaluation and prognosis prediction. In addition, judgment and diagnoses made by experts are usually based on multiple years of experience and subjective impression which lead to variable results in the same case. With accumulation of medical imaging data, radiomics emerges as a relatively new approach for analysis. Via artificial intelligence techniques, high-throughput quantitative data which is invisible to the naked eyes extracted from original images can be used in the process of patients’ management. Several studies have evaluated radiomics combined with clinical factors, pathological, or genetic information would assist in the diagnosis, particularly in the prediction of biological characteristics, risk of recurrence, and survival with encouraging results. In various clinical settings, there are limitations and challenges needing to be overcome before transformation. Therefore, we summarize the concepts and method of radiomics including image acquisition, region of interest segmentation, feature extraction and model development. We also set forth the current applications of radiomics in clinical routine. At last, the limitations and related deficiencies of radiomics are pointed out to direct the future opportunities and development.

CT-Based Radiomics Can Predict the Efficacy of Anlotinib in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Anlotinib is a small-molecule RTK inhibitor that has achieved certain results in further-line treatment, but many patients do not respond to this drug and lack effective methods for identification. Although radiomics has been widely used in lung cancer, very few studies have been conducted in the field of antiangiogenic drugs. This study aims to develop a new model to predict the efficacy of patients receiving anlotinib by combining pretreatment computed tomography (CT) radiomic characters with clinical characters, in order to assist precision medicine of pulmonary cancer. 254 patients from seven institutions were involved in the study. Lesions were selected according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria, and the corresponding radiomic features were obtained. We constructed prediction models based on clinical, NCE-CT, and CE-CT radiomic features, respectively, and evaluated the prediction performance of the models for training sets, internal validation sets, and external validation sets. In the RAD score only model, the area under curve(AUC) of the NCE-CT cohort was 0.740 (95% CI: 0.622, 0.857) for the training set, 0.711 (95% CI: 0.480, 0.942) for the internal validation set, and 0.633(95% CI: 0.479, 0.787) for the external validation set, while that of the CE-CT cohort was 0.815 (95% CI: 0.705, 0.926) for the training set, 0.771 (95% CI: 0.539, 1.000) for the internal validation set, and 0.701 (95% CI: 0.489, 0.913) for the external validation set. In the RAD score-combined model, the AUC of the NCE-CT cohort was 0.796 (95% CI: 0.691, 0.901) for the training set, 0.579 (95% CI: 0.309, 0.848) for the internal validation set, and 0.590 (95% CI: 0.427, 0.753) for the external validation set, while that of the CE-CT cohort was 0.902 (95% CI: 0.828, 0.977) for the training set, 0.865 (95% CI: 0.696, 1.000) for the internal validation set, and 0.837 (95% CI: 0.682, 0.992) for the external validation set. In conclusion, radiomics has accurate predictions for the efficacy of anlotinib. CE-CT-based radiomic models have the best predictive potential in predicting the efficacy of anlotinib, and model predictions become better when they are combined with clinical characteristics.

Radiomics Combined with Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms in Differentiating Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma from Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: More Hands Produce a Stronger Flame

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic ability of radiomics combined with multiple machine learning algorithms to differentiate pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET). This retrospective study included a total of 238 patients diagnosed with PDAC or pNET. Using specialized software, radiologists manually mapped regions of interest (ROIs) from computed tomography images and automatically extracted radiomics features. A total of 45 discriminative models were built by five selection algorithms and nine classification algorithms. The performances of the discriminative models were assessed by sensitivity, specificity and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the training and validation datasets. Using the combination of Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) as the selection algorithm and Random Forest (RF) as the classification algorithm, the optimal diagnostic ability with the highest AUC was presented in the training and validation datasets. The sensitivity, specificity and AUC of the model were 0.804, 0.973 and 0.971 in the training dataset and 0.742, 0.934 and 0.930 in the validation dataset, respectively. The combination of radiomics and multiple machine learning algorithms showed the potential ability to discriminate PDAC from pNET. We suggest that multi-algorithm modeling should be considered for similar studies in the future rather than using a single algorithm empirically.

Radiomics-based Machine-learning Models Can Detect Pancreatic Cancer on Prediagnostic Computed Tomography Scans at a Substantial Lead Time Before Clinical Diagnosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Our purpose was to detect pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at the prediagnostic stage (3-36 months before clinical diagnosis) using radiomics-based machine-learning (ML) models, and to compare performance against radiologists in a case-control study.

METHODS

Volumetric pancreas segmentation was performed on prediagnostic computed tomography scans (CTs) (median interval between CT and PDAC diagnosis: 398 days) of 155 patients and an age-matched cohort of 265 subjects with normal pancreas. A total of 88 first-order and gray-level radiomic features were extracted and 34 features were selected through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-based feature selection method. The dataset was randomly divided into training (292 CTs: 110 prediagnostic and 182 controls) and test subsets (128 CTs: 45 prediagnostic and 83 controls). Four ML classifiers, k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were evaluated. Specificity of model with highest accuracy was further validated on an independent internal dataset (n = 176) and the public National Institutes of Health dataset (n = 80). Two radiologists (R4 and R5) independently evaluated the pancreas on a 5-point diagnostic scale.

RESULTS

Median (range) time between prediagnostic CTs of the test subset and PDAC diagnosis was 386 (97-1092) days. SVM had the highest sensitivity (mean; 95% confidence interval) (95.5; 85.5-100.0), specificity (90.3; 84.3-91.5), F1-score (89.5; 82.3-91.7), area under the curve (AUC) (0.98; 0.94-0.98), and accuracy (92.2%; 86.7-93.7) for classification of CTs into prediagnostic versus normal. All 3 other ML models, KNN, RF, and XGBoost, had comparable AUCs (0.95, 0.95, and 0.96, respectively). The high specificity of SVM was generalizable to both the independent internal (92.6%) and the National Institutes of Health dataset (96.2%). In contrast, interreader radiologist agreement was only fair (Cohen's kappa 0.3) and their mean AUC (0.66; 0.46-0.86) was lower than each of the 4 ML models (AUCs: 0.95-0.98) (P < .001). Radiologists also recorded false positive indirect findings of PDAC in control subjects (n = 83) (7% R4, 18% R5).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics-based ML models can detect PDAC from normal pancreas when it is beyond human interrogation capability at a substantial lead time before clinical diagnosis. Prospective validation and integration of such models with complementary fluid-based biomarkers has the potential for PDAC detection at a stage when surgical cure is a possibility.

Imaging of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An Update on Recent Advances

Pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Computed tomography (CT) remains the primary imaging modality for diagnosis of PDAC. However, CT has limitations for early pancreatic tumor detection and tumor characterization so that it is currently challenged by magnetic resonance imaging. More recently, a particular attention has been given to radiomics for the characterization of pancreatic lesions using extraction and analysis of quantitative imaging features. In addition, radiomics has currently many applications that are developed in conjunction with artificial intelligence (AI) with the aim of better characterizing pancreatic lesions and providing a more precise assessment of tumor burden. This review article sums up recent advances in imaging of PDAC in the field of image/data acquisition, tumor detection, tumor characterization, treatment response evaluation, and preoperative planning. In addition, current applications of radiomics and AI in the field of PDAC are discussed.

New frontiers in imaging including radiomics updates for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

To illustrate the applications of various imaging tools including conventional MDCT, MRI including DWI, CT & MRI radiomics, FDG & DOTATATE PET-CT for diagnosis, staging, grading, prognostication, treatment planning and assessing treatment response in cases of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs).

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NENs) are very diverse clinically & biologically. Their treatment and prognosis depend on staging and primary site, as well as histological grading, the importance of which is also reflected in the recently updated WHO classification of GEP NENs. Grade 3 poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are aggressive & nearly always advanced at diagnosis with poor prognosis; whereas Grades-1 and 2 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be quite indolent. Grade 3 well-differentiated NETs represent a new category of neoplasm with an intermediate prognosis. Importantly, the evidence suggest grade heterogeneity can occur within a given tumor and even grade progression can occur over time. Emerging evidence suggests that several non-invasive qualitative and quantitative imaging features on CT, dual-energy CT (DECT), MRI, PET and somatostatin receptor imaging with new tracers, as well as texture analysis, may be useful to grade, prognosticate, and accurately stage primary NENs. Imaging features may also help to inform choice of treatment and follow these neoplasms post-treatment.

CONCLUSION

GEP NENs treatment and prognosis depend on the stage as well as histological grade of the tumor. Traditional ways of imaging evaluation for diagnosis and staging does not yet yield sufficient information to replace operative and histological evaluation. Recognition of important qualitative imaging features together with quantitative features and advanced imaging tools including functional imaging with DWI MRI, DOTATATE PET/CT, texture analysis with radiomics and radiogenomic features appear promising for more accurate staging, tumor risk stratification, guiding management and assessing treatment response.

Update on quantitative radiomics of pancreatic tumors

Radiomics is a newer approach for analyzing radiological images obtained from conventional imaging modalities such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasonography, and positron emission tomography. Radiomics involves extracting quantitative data from the images and assessing them to identify diagnostic or prognostic features such as tumor grade, resectability, tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy, and survival. The purpose of this review is to discuss the basic principles of radiomics and provide an overview of the current clinical applications of radiomics in the field of pancreatic tumors.

Artificial Intelligence Applied to Pancreatic Imaging: A Narrative Review

The diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment planning of pancreatic pathologies usually require the combined use of different imaging modalities, mainly, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET). Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform the clinical practice of medical imaging and has been applied to various radiological techniques for different purposes, such as segmentation, lesion detection, characterization, risk stratification, or prediction of response to treatments. The aim of the present narrative review is to assess the available literature on the role of AI applied to pancreatic imaging. Up to now, the use of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) and radiomics in pancreatic imaging has proven to be useful for both non-oncological and oncological purposes and represents a promising tool for personalized approaches to patients. Although great developments have occurred in recent years, it is important to address the obstacles that still need to be overcome before these technologies can be implemented into our clinical routine, mainly considering the heterogeneity among studies.

Radiomics in pancreatic cancer for oncologist: Present and future

Radiomics is changing the world of medicine and more specifically the world of oncology. Early diagnosis and treatment improve the prognosis of patients with cancer. After treatment, the evaluation of the response will determine future treatments. In oncology, every change in treatment means a loss of therapeutic options and this is key in pancreatic cancer. Radiomics has been developed in oncology in the early diagnosis and differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, in the evaluation of response, in the prediction of possible side effects, marking the risk of recurrence, survival and prognosis of the disease. Some studies have validated its use to differentiate normal tissues from tumor tissues with high sensitivity and specificity, and to differentiate cystic lesions and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor grades with texture parameters. In addition, these parameters have been related to survival in patients with pancreatic cancer and to response to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. This review aimed to establish the current status of the use of radiomics in pancreatic cancer and future perspectives.

GEP-NET radiomics: a systematic review and radiomics quality score assessment

OBJECTIVE

The number of radiomics studies in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) is rapidly increasing. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the available evidence of radiomics for clinical outcome measures in GEP-NETs, to understand which applications hold the most promise and which areas lack evidence.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Wiley/Cochrane Library databases were searched and a forward and backward reference check of the identified studies was executed. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients with GEP-NETs and (2) radiomics analysis on CT, MRI or PET. Two reviewers independently agreed on eligibility and assessed methodological quality with the radiomics quality score (RQS) and extracted outcome data.

RESULTS

In total, 1364 unique studies were identified and 45 were included for analysis. Most studies focused on GEP-NET grade and differential diagnosis of GEP-NETs from other neoplasms, while only a minority analysed treatment response or long-term outcomes. Several studies were able to predict tumour grade or to differentiate GEP-NETs from other lesions with a good performance (AUCs 0.74-0.96 and AUCs 0.80-0.99, respectively). Only one study developed a model to predict recurrence in pancreas NETs (AUC 0.77). The included studies reached a mean RQS of 18%.

CONCLUSION

Although radiomics for GEP-NETs is still a relatively new area, some promising models have been developed. Future research should focus on developing robust models for clinically relevant aims such as prediction of response or long-term outcome in GEP-NET, since evidence for these aims is still scarce.

KEY POINTS

• The majority of radiomics studies in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours is of low quality. • Most evidence for radiomics is available for the identification of tumour grade or differentiation of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours from other neoplasms. • Radiomics for the prediction of response or long-term outcome in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours warrants further research.

A case of solid-type pancreatic hamartoma presenting high apparent diffusion coefficient value: histopathological correlation and literature review

Pancreatic hamartoma is a rare tumor-like malformation and could mimic other pancreatic tumors including malignant neoplasm. Due to its rarity, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings including those diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging have not been clarified. We present a curious case of pancreatic hamartoma presenting high apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value with histopathological correlation. A 49-year-old woman with a pancreatic mass found incidentally on ultrasonography for medical checkup was referred to our institution for further examination and treatment because it slightly enlarged in the follow-up examination. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced MR imaging revealed a well-demarcated solid mass of 13 mm in diameter in the pancreas body, which was gradually and homogeneously enhanced in the delayed/transient phase. It showed hyper intensity on T2-weight and DW images, and the mean ADC value was high (1.86 × 10^-3mm²/s). Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was conducted with suspicious preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic hypovascular neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN). Histologically, the mass consisted of many disarranged small ducts without atypia embedded in abundant fibrous stroma and contained scant fatty tissue in the periphery, which was not identified on CT and MR images. There were no islets and peripheral nerves throughout the mass. Finally, it was pathologically diagnosed as a solid-type pancreatic hamartoma. Based on radiological-pathological correlation, it was considered that the abundant fibrous stroma and both the widely distributed myxomatous periductal stroma and scattered edematous stroma corresponded with delayed homogenous enhancement on CT/MR images and high ADC value, respectively. Although it is difficult to distinguish solid-type pancreatic hamartoma from other solid pancreatic neoplasms including hypovascular NEN on the basis of usual radiological findings, the high ADC value reflecting the specific pathology may be helpful for the differential diagnosis.

Basic pancreatic lesions: Radiologic-pathologic correlation

The basic pancreatic lesions include location, size, shape, number, capsule, calcification/calculi, hemorrhage, cystic degeneration, fibrosis, pancreatic duct alterations, and microvessel. One or more basic lesions form a kind of pancreatic disease. As recognizing the characteristic imaging features of pancreatic basic lesions and their relationships with pathology aids in differentiating the variety of pancreatic diseases. The purpose of this study is to review the pathological and imaging features of the basic pancreatic lesions.

Using Quantitative Imaging for Personalized Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Radiomics and Deep Learning Applications

Simple Summary

With a five-year survival rate of only 3% for the majority of patients, pancreatic cancer is a global healthcare challenge. Radiomics and deep learning, two novel quantitative imaging methods that treat medical images as minable data instead of just pictures, have shown promise in advancing personalized management of pancreatic cancer through diagnosing precursor diseases, early detection, accurate diagnosis, and treatment personalization. Radiomics and deep learning methods aim to collect hidden information in medical images that is missed by conventional radiology practices through expanding the data search and comparing information across different patients. Both methods have been studied and applied in pancreatic cancer. In this review, we focus on the current progress of these two methods in pancreatic cancer and provide a comprehensive narrative review on the topic. With better regulation, enhanced workflow, and larger prospective patient datasets, radiomics and deep learning methods could show real hope in the battle against pancreatic cancer through personalized precision medicine.

Abstract

As the most lethal major cancer, pancreatic cancer is a global healthcare challenge. Personalized medicine utilizing cutting-edge multi-omics data holds potential for major breakthroughs in tackling this critical problem. Radiomics and deep learning, two trendy quantitative imaging methods that take advantage of data science and modern medical imaging, have shown increasing promise in advancing the precision management of pancreatic cancer via diagnosing of precursor diseases, early detection, accurate diagnosis, and treatment personalization and optimization. Radiomics employs manually-crafted features, while deep learning applies computer-generated automatic features. These two methods aim to mine hidden information in medical images that is missed by conventional radiology and gain insights by systematically comparing the quantitative image information across different patients in order to characterize unique imaging phenotypes. Both methods have been studied and applied in various pancreatic cancer clinical applications. In this review, we begin with an introduction to the clinical problems and the technology. After providing technical overviews of the two methods, this review focuses on the current progress of clinical applications in precancerous lesion diagnosis, pancreatic cancer detection and diagnosis, prognosis prediction, treatment stratification, and radiogenomics. The limitations of current studies and methods are discussed, along with future directions. With better standardization and optimization of the workflow from image acquisition to analysis and with larger and especially prospective high-quality datasets, radiomics and deep learning methods could show real hope in the battle against pancreatic cancer through big data-based high-precision personalization.

Machine intelligence in non-invasive endocrine cancer diagnostics

Artificial intelligence (AI) has illuminated a clear path towards an evolving health-care system replete with enhanced precision and computing capabilities. Medical imaging analysis can be strengthened by machine learning as the multidimensional data generated by imaging naturally lends itself to hierarchical classification. In this Review, we describe the role of machine intelligence in image-based endocrine cancer diagnostics. We first provide a brief overview of AI and consider its intuitive incorporation into the clinical workflow. We then discuss how AI can be applied for the characterization of adrenal, pancreatic, pituitary and thyroid masses in order to support clinicians in their diagnostic interpretations. This Review also puts forth a number of key evaluation criteria for machine learning in medicine that physicians can use in their appraisals of these algorithms. We identify mitigation strategies to address ongoing challenges around data availability and model interpretability in the context of endocrine cancer diagnosis. Finally, we delve into frontiers in systems integration for AI, discussing automated pipelines and evolving computing platforms that leverage distributed, decentralized and quantum techniques.

Assessment of renal function using magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses

Background

The incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is high, and is easy to develop into end-stage renal disease (ESRD), which requires kidney dialysis or kidney transplantation. Therefore, we want to explore the clinical value of magnetic resonance quantitative histogram analysis based on spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses (SLEEK) in assessing renal function in the early stage.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-nine patients underwent abdominal MRI examination, including a coronal SLEEK sequence. The patients were divided into the control group [CG, 47 cases, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >90], the mild renal function impairment (mRI) group (48 cases, eGFR =60–90), and the moderate to severe renal function impairment (m-sRI) group (34 cases, eGFR <60). Two experienced radiologists delineated cortex and medulla regions of interest (ROIs) on SLEEK images to obtain cortex and medulla quantitative histogram parameters [Mean, Median, Percentiles (5^th, 10^th, 25^th, 75^th, and 90^th), Skewness, Kurtosis, and Entropy] using FireVoxel. These histogram parameters were compared by proper statistical methods such as one-way analysis of variance, the χ² test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

Four histogram parameters (Inhomogeneity_cortex, Skewness_cortex, Kurtosis_medulla, and Entropy_medulla) differed significantly between the CG and the mRI group. One medulla (Entropy_medulla) and nine cortex (Mean_cortex, Median_cortex, Kurtosis_cortex, Entropy_cortex, and 5^th, 10^th, 25^th, 75^th, and 90^th Percentile_cortex) histogram parameters were significantly different between the m-RI and m-sRI groups. The most relevant parameter to eGFR was Inhomogenity_cortex (r=−0.450, P<0.001). Inhomogeneity_cortex had the largest area under the curve (AUC) for differentiating the mRI group from the CG (AUC =0.718; 95% CI: 0.616–0.806), while 25^th Percentile_cortex generated the largest AUC (AUC =0.786; 95% CI: 0.681–0.869) for differentiating the mRI and m-sRI groups.

Conclusions

Quantitative histogram parameters based on a SLEEK sequence can be used to supplement renal dysfunction assessment. Cortex histogram parameters are more valuable for evaluating renal function than medulla histogram parameters.

Recent advances in artificial intelligence for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains the most lethal type of cancer. The 5-year survival rate for patients with early-stage diagnosis can be as high as 20%, suggesting that early diagnosis plays a pivotal role in the prognostic improvement of PDAC cases. In the medical field, the broad availability of biomedical data has led to the advent of the "big data" era. To overcome this deadly disease, how to fully exploit big data is a new challenge in the era of precision medicine. Artificial intelligence (AI) is the ability of a machine to learn and display intelligence to solve problems. AI can help to transform big data into clinically actionable insights more efficiently, reduce inevitable errors to improve diagnostic accuracy, and make real-time predictions. AI-based omics analyses will become the next alterative approach to overcome this poor-prognostic disease by discovering biomarkers for early detection, providing molecular/genomic subtyping, offering treatment guidance, and predicting recurrence and survival. Advances in AI may therefore improve PDAC survival outcomes in the near future. The present review mainly focuses on recent advances of AI in PDAC for clinicians. We believe that breakthroughs will soon emerge to fight this deadly disease using AI-navigated precision medicine.

Computed tomography-based radiomics approach in pancreatic tumors characterization

Radiomics (or texture analysis) is a new imaging analysis technique that allows calculating the distribution of texture features of pixel and voxel values depend on the type of ROI (3D or 2D), their relationships in the image. Depending on the software, up to several thousand texture elements can be obtained. Radiomics opens up wide opportunities for differential diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic neoplasias. The aim of this review was to highlight the main diagnostic advantages of texture analysis in different pancreatic tumors. The review describes the diagnostic performance of radiomics in different pancreatic tumor types, application methods, and problems. Texture analysis in PDAC is able to predict tumor grade and associates with lymphovascular invasion and postoperative margin status. In pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, texture features strongly correlate with differentiation grade and allows distinguishing it from the intrapancreatic accessory spleen. In pancreatic cystic lesions, radiomics is able to accurately differentiate MCN from SCN and distinguish clinically insignificant lesions from IPMNs with advanced neoplasia. In conclusion, the use of the CT radiomics approach provides a higher diagnostic performance of CT imaging in pancreatic tumors differentiation and prognosis. Future studies should be carried out to improve accuracy and facilitate radiomics workflow in pancreatic imaging.

Application of CT-Based Radiomics in Discriminating Pancreatic Cystadenomas From Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Machine Learning Methods

Objectives

The purpose of this study aimed at investigating the reliability of radiomics features extracted from contrast-enhanced CT in differentiating pancreatic cystadenomas from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) using machine-learning methods.

Methods

In this study, a total number of 120 patients, including 66 pancreatic cystadenomas patients and 54 PNETs patients were enrolled. Forty-eight radiomic features were extracted from contrast-enhanced CT images using LIFEx software. Five feature selection methods were adopted to determine the appropriate features for classifiers. Then, nine machine learning classifiers were employed to build predictive models. The performance of the forty-five models was evaluated with area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score in the testing group.

Results

The predictive models exhibited reliable ability of differentiating pancreatic cystadenomas from PNETs when combined with suitable selection methods. A combination of DC as the selection method and RF as the classifier, as well as Xgboost+RF, demonstrated the best discriminative ability, with the highest AUC of 0.997 in the testing group.

Conclusions

Radiomics-based machine learning methods might be a noninvasive tool to assist in differentiating pancreatic cystadenomas and PNETs.

CT texture analysis of abdominal lesions – Part II: Tumors of the Kidney and Pancreas

It has been proven in a few early studies that radiomic analysis offers a promising opportunity to detect or differentiate between organ lesions based on their unique texture parameters. Recently, the utilization of CT texture analysis (CTTA) has been receiving significant attention, especially for response evaluation and prognostication of different oncological diagnoses. In this review article, we discuss the unique ability of radiomics and its subfield CTTA to diagnose lesions in the pancreas and kidney. We review studies in which CTTA was used for the classification of histology grades in pancreas and kidney tumors. We also review the role of radiogenomics in the prediction of the molecular and genetic subtypes of pancreatic tumors. Furthermore, we provide a short report on recent advancements of radiomic analysis in predicting prognosis and survival of patients with pancreatic and renal cancers.

Hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with hepatic metastases: A case report and literature review

Hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are uncommon pancreatic tumors and commonly misdiagnosed as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or chronic mass-forming pancreatitis. The liver is the organ most commonly affected by neuroendocrine tumor metastases but hepatic neuroendocrine tumor metastases are quite difficult to discriminate from other hepatic metastases and primary hepatic tumors. We describe a case of a 47-year-old man with incidentally detected multiple hepatic lesions on ultrasound. On further imaging technique including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, the patient had an abnormal hypoenhancing lesion at the pancreatic tail and multiple hyperenhancing hepatic metastases that were diagnosed as hypovascular pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor Grade 2 with multiple hypervascular hepatic metastases after liver biopsy and surgery. Neuroendocrine tumor is a rare etiology among hypoenhancing pancreatic tumors, and must be considered to discriminate from pancreatic adenocarcinomas in cases there are multiple hyperenhancing hepatic metastases on the arterial phase without typical washout on the portal venous phase.

Radiomics in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: methodological issues and clinical significance

PURPOSE

To present the state-of-art of radiomics in the context of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), with a focus on the methodological and technical approaches used, to support the search of guidelines for optimal applications. Furthermore, an up-to-date overview of the current clinical applications of radiomics in the field of PanNETs is provided.

METHODS

Original articles were searched on PubMed and Science Direct with specific keywords. Evaluations of the selected studies have been focused mainly on (i) the general radiomic workflow and the assessment of radiomic features robustness/reproducibility, as well as on the major clinical applications and investigations accomplished so far with radiomics in the field of PanNETs: (ii) grade prediction, (iii) differential diagnosis from other neoplasms, (iv) assessment of tumor behavior and aggressiveness, and (v) treatment response prediction.

RESULTS

Thirty-one articles involving PanNETs radiomic-related objectives were selected. In regard to the grade differentiation task, yielded AUCs are currently in the range of 0.7-0.9. For differential diagnosis, the majority of studies are still focused on the preliminary identification of discriminative radiomic features. Limited information is known on the prediction of tumors aggressiveness and of treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics is recently expanding in the setting of PanNETs. From the analysis of the published data, it is emerging how, prior to clinical application, further validations are necessary and methodological implementations require optimization. Nevertheless, this new discipline might have the potential in assisting the current urgent need of improving the management strategies in PanNETs patients.

Primary Gastro-Intestinal Lymphoma and Gastro-Intestinal Adenocarcinoma: An Initial Study of CT Texture Analysis as Quantitative Biomarkers for Differentiation

BACKGROUND

To explore the potential role of computed tomography (CT) texture analysis and an imaging biomarker in differentiating primary gastro-intestinal lymphoma (PGIL) from gastro-intestinal adenocarcinoma (GIAC).

METHODS

A total of 131 patients with surgical pathologically PGIL and GIAC were enrolled in this study. Histogram parameters of arterial and venous phases extracted from contrast enhanced modified discrete cosine transform (MDCT) images were compared between PGIL and GIAC by Mann-Whitney U tests. The optimal parameters for differentiating these two groups were obtained through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

RESULTS

Compared with GIAC, in arterial phase, PGIL had statistically higher 5th, 10th percentiles (p = 0.003 and 0.011) and statistically lower entropy (p = 0.001). In the venous phase, PGIL had statistically lower mean, median, 75th, 90th, 95th percentiles, and entropy (p = 0.036, 0.029, 0.007, 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). For differentiating PGIL from GIAC, V-median + A-5th percentile was an optimal parameter for combined diagnosis (AUC = 0.746, p < 0.0001), and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 81.7 and 64.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CT texture analysis could be useful for differential diagnosis of PGIL and GIAC.

Application of Radiomics Analysis Based on CT Combined With Machine Learning in Diagnostic of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Patient's Pathological Grades

Purpose

To evaluate the value of multiple machine learning methods in classifying pathological grades (G1,G2, and G3), and to provide the best machine learning method for the identification of pathological grades of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) based on radiomics.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 82 patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine tumors. All patients had definite pathological diagnosis and grading results. Using Lifex software to extract the radiomics features from CT images manually. The sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy were used to evaluate the performance of the classification model.

Result

Our analysis shows that the CT based radiomics features combined with multi algorithm machine learning method has a strong ability to identify the pathological grades of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. DC + AdaBoost, DC + GBDT, and Xgboost+RF were very valuable for the differential diagnosis of three pathological grades of PNET. They showed a strong ability to identify the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The validation set AUC of DC + AdaBoost is 0.82 (G1 vs G2), 0.70 (G2 vs G3), and 0.85 (G1 vs G3), respectively.

Conclusion

In conclusion, based on enhanced CT radiomics features could differentiate between different pathological grades of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Feature selection method Distance Correlation + classifier method Adaptive Boosting show a good application prospect.

Prediction of the World Health Organization Grade of rectal neuroendocrine tumors based on CT histogram analysis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) histogram analysis in predicting the World Health Organization (WHO) grade of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (R-NETs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 61 (35 G1, 12 G2, 10 G3, and 4 NECs) patients who underwent preoperative CECT and treated with surgery to be confirmed as R-NETs were included in this study from January 2014 to May 2019. We depicted ROIs and measured the CECT texture parameters (mean, median, 10th, 25th, 75th, 90th percentiles, skewness, kurtosis, and entropy) from arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP) images by two radiologists. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and compared the histogram parameters between low-grade (G1) and higher grade (HG) (G2/G3/NECs) by applying appropriate statistical method. We obtained the optimal parameters to identify G1 from HG using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

The capability of AP and VP histogram parameters for differentiating G1 from HG was similar in several histogram parameters (mean, median, 10th, 25th, 75th, and 90th percentiles) (all p < 0.001). Skewness, kurtosis, and entropy on AP images showed no significant differences between G1 and HG (p = 0.853, 0.512, 0.557, respectively). Entropy on VP images was significantly different (p = 0.017) between G1 and HG, however, skewness and kurtosis showed no significant differences (p = 0.654, 0.172, respectively). ROC analysis showed a good predictive performance between G1 and HG, and the 75th (AP) generated the highest area under the curve (AUC = 0.871), followed by the 25th (AP), mean (VP), and median (VP) (AUC = 0.864). Combined the size of tumor and the 75th (AP) generated the highest AUC.

CONCLUSIONS

CECT histogram parameters, including arterial and venous phases, can be used as excellent indicators for predicting G1 and HG of rectal neuroendocrine tumors, and the size of the tumor is also an important independent predictor.

Evaluation of hepatic steatosis before liver transplantation in ex vivo by volumetric quantitative PDFF-MRI

PURPOSE

Over the last two decades, extended criteria have promoted an increased number of donor livers available for liver transplantation. But posttransplant graft loss is still a major concern. Macrovesicular hepatic steatosis (MHS) is recognized as the most significant prognostic histologic parameter in predicting posttransplant graft loss. We aimed to evaluate the utility of ex vivo volumetric quantitative MRI for quantifying MHS before liver transplantation using proton density fat-fraction (PDFF-MRI) histogram analysis.

METHODS

PDFF-MRI was performed at 3.0T in 40 livers. We obtained histogram parameters of whole-liver volume of interest, including the mean, median, 5th, 10th, 25th, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentile PDFF; skewness; kurtosis; entropy; and volume.

RESULTS

Livers from 40 cadaveric donors were included, and histologic ex vivo fat quantification was available for 33 livers. Ten livers had MHS and 23 had normal fat content. The MHS group had higher mean, median, 5th, 10th, 25th, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentile PDFF, and entropy than the group with normal fat content (P < .05). Median PDFF had greater area under the curve value than other parameters. Mean PDFF showed an excellent correlation with entropy and a moderate correlation with MHS quantification on histology.

CONCLUSIONS

Ex vivo volumetric quantitative PDFF-MRI histogram analysis is a very useful and noninvasive method to detect MHS before liver transplantation. Median PDFF was the best predictor of the presence of MHS. Entropy is a very promising parameter.

Pancreas image mining: a systematic review of radiomics

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review published studies on the use of radiomics of the pancreas.

METHODS

The search was conducted in the MEDLINE database. Human studies that investigated the applications of radiomics in diseases of the pancreas were included. The radiomics quality score was calculated for each included study.

RESULTS

A total of 72 studies encompassing 8863 participants were included. Of them, 66 investigated focal pancreatic lesions (pancreatic cancer, precancerous lesions, or benign lesions); 4, pancreatitis; and 2, diabetes mellitus. The principal applications of radiomics were differential diagnosis between various types of focal pancreatic lesions (n = 19), classification of pancreatic diseases (n = 23), and prediction of prognosis or treatment response (n = 30). Second-order texture features were most useful for the purpose of differential diagnosis of diseases of the pancreas (with 100% of studies investigating them found a statistically significant feature), whereas filtered image features were most useful for the purpose of classification of diseases of the pancreas and prediction of diseases of the pancreas (with 100% of studies investigating them found a statistically significant feature). The median radiomics quality score of the included studies was 28%, with the interquartile range of 22% to 36%. The radiomics quality score was significantly correlated with the number of extracted radiomics features (r = 0.52, p < 0.001) and the study sample size (r = 0.34, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics of the pancreas holds promise as a quantitative imaging biomarker of both focal pancreatic lesions and diffuse changes of the pancreas. The usefulness of radiomics features may vary depending on the purpose of their application. Standardisation of image acquisition protocols and image pre-processing is warranted prior to considering the use of radiomics of the pancreas in routine clinical practice.

KEY POINTS

• Methodologically sound studies on radiomics of the pancreas are characterised by a large sample size and a large number of extracted features. • Optimisation of the radiomics pipeline will increase the clinical utility of mineable pancreas imaging data. • Radiomics of the pancreas is a promising personalised medicine tool in diseases of the pancreas.

CT and MRI of pancreatic tumors: an update in the era of radiomics

Radiomics is a relatively new approach for image analysis. As a part of radiomics, texture analysis, which consists in extracting a great amount of quantitative data from original images, can be used to identify specific features that can help determining the actual nature of a pancreatic lesion and providing other information such as resectability, tumor grade, tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy or survival after surgery. In this review, the basic of radiomics, recent developments and the results of texture analysis using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the field of pancreatic tumors are presented. Future applications of radiomics, such as artificial intelligence, are discussed.

Pancreatic Cancer Imaging: A New Look at an Old Problem

Computed tomography is the most commonly used imaging modality to detect and stage pancreatic cancer. Previous advances in pancreatic cancer imaging have focused on optimizing image acquisition parameters and reporting standards. However, current state-of-the-art imaging approaches still misdiagnose some potentially curable pancreatic cancers and do not provide prognostic information or inform optimal management strategies beyond stage. Several recent developments in pancreatic cancer imaging, including artificial intelligence and advanced visualization techniques, are rapidly changing the field. The purpose of this article is to review how these recent advances have the potential to revolutionize pancreatic cancer imaging.

Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Signature for the Preoperative Differentiation of Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma From Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Purpose

The purpose was to assess the predictive ability of computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics signature in differential diagnosis between pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Materials and Methods

Eighty-one patients (63.6 ± 8.8 years old) with PDAC and 31 patients (64.7 ± 11.1 years old) with PASC who underwent preoperative CE-CT were included. A total of 792 radiomics features were extracted from the late arterial phase (n = 396) and portal venous phase (n = 396) for each case. Significantly different features were selected using Mann-Whitney U test, univariate logistic regression analysis, and minimum redundancy and maximum relevance method. A radiomics signature was constructed using random forest method, the robustness and the reliability of which was validated using 10-times leave group out cross-validation (LGOCV) method.

Results

Seven radiomics features from late arterial phase images and three from portal venous phase images were finally selected. The radiomics signature performed well in differential diagnosis between PASC and PDAC, with 94.5% accuracy, 98.3% sensitivity, 90.1% specificity, 91.9% positive predictive value (PPV), and 97.8% negative predictive value (NPV). Moreover, the radiomics signature was proved to be robust and reliable using the LGOCV method, with 76.4% accuracy, 91.1% sensitivity, 70.8% specificity, 56.7% PPV, and 96.2% NPV.

Conclusion

CT-based radiomics signature may serve as a promising non-invasive method in differential diagnosis between PASC and PDAC.

Emerging imaging techniques for acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is caused by acute inflammation of the pancreas and adjacent tissue and is a common source of abdominal pain. The current CT and MRI evaluation of AP is mostly based on morphologic features. Recent advances in image acquisition and analysis offer the opportunity to go beyond morphologic features. Advanced MR techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging, as well as T1 and T2 mapping, can potentially quantify signal changes reflective of underlying tissue abnormalities. Advanced analytic techniques such as radiomics and artificial neural networks (ANNs) offer the promise of uncovering imaging biomarkers that can provide additional classification and prognostic information. The purpose of this article is to review recent advances in imaging acquisition and analytic techniques in the evaluation of AP.

Differentiating hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on CT texture analysis

Background

Hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor is usually misdiagnosed as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Purpose

To investigate the value of texture analysis in differentiating hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images.

Material and Methods

Twenty-one patients with hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and 63 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas were included in this study. All patients underwent preoperative unenhanced and dynamic contrast-enhanced CT examinations. Two radiologists independently and manually contoured the region of interest of each lesion using texture analysis software on pancreatic parenchymal and portal phase CT images. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify significant features to differentiate hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to ascertain diagnostic ability.

Results

The following CT texture features were obtained to differentiate hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: RMS (root mean square) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, P<0.001), Quantile50 (OR = 1.83, P<0.001), and sumAverage (OR = 0.92, P=0.007) in parenchymal images and “contrast” in portal phase images (OR = 6.08, P<0.001). The areas under the curves were 0.76 for RMS (sensitivity = 0.75, specificity = 0.67), 0.73 for Quantile50 (sensitivity = 0.60, specificity = 0.77), 0.70 for sumAverage (sensitivity = 0.65, specificity = 0.82), 0.85 for the combined texture features (sensitivity = 0.77, specificity = 0.85).

Conclusion

CT texture analysis may be helpful to differentiate hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. The three combined texture features showed acceptable diagnostic performance.

Bridging the gap between micro- and macro-scales in medical imaging with textural analysis - A biological basis for CT radiomics classifiers?

INTRODUCTION

Studies suggest there is utility in computed tomography (CT) radiomics for pancreatic disease; however, the precise biological interpretation of its features is unclear. In this manuscript, we present a novel approach towards this interpretation by investigating sub-micron tissue structure using digital pathology.

METHODS

A classification-to attenuation (CAT) function was developed and applied to digital pathology images to create sub-micron linear attenuation maps. From these maps, grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features were extracted and compared to pathology features. To simulate the spatial frequency loss in a CT scanner, the attenuation maps were convolved with a point spread function (PSF) and subsequently down-sampled. GLCM features were extracted from these down-sampled maps to assess feature stability as a function of spatial frequency loss.

RESULTS

Two GLCM features were shown to be strongly and positively correlated (r = 0.8) with underlying characteristics of the tumor microenvironment, namely percent pimonidazole staining in the tumor. All features underwent marked change as a function of spatial frequency loss; progressively larger spatial frequency losses resulted in progressively larger inter-tumor standard deviations; two GLCM features exhibited stability up to a 100 µm pixel size.

CONCLUSION

This work represents a necessary step towards understanding the biological significance of radiomics. Our preliminary results suggest that cellular metrics of pimonidazole-detectable hypoxia correlate with sub-micron attenuation coefficient texture; however, the consistency of these textures in face of spatial frequency loss is detrimental for robust radiomics. Further study in larger data sets may elucidate additional, potentially more robust features of biologic and clinical relevance.

Differential Diagnosis of Nonhypervascular Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms From Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas, Based on Computed Tomography Radiological Features and Texture Analysis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To determine computed tomography (CT) radiological features and texture features that are rewarding in differentiating nonhypervascular pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared patients to pathologically proven nonhypervascular PNENs and age-matched controls with pathologically proven PDACs in a 1:2 ratio. Preoperative CT images in the arterial phase (AP) and portal vein phase (PVP) were obtained. Two radiologists independently reviewed the morphological characteristics of each tumor. Three-dimensional regions of interest (ROIs), drawn using ITK-SNAP software, were input into AK software (Artificial Intelligent Kit, GE) to extract texture features from AP and PVP images. Differences between PNENs and PDACs were analyzed with the chi-squared test, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, kappa statistics, and uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 40 nonhypervascular PNENs and 80 PDACs were evaluated. Maximum diameter on axial section, margin, calcification, vascularity in the tumor, and tumor heterogeneity were significantly different between PDACs and nonhypervascular PNENs. Multivariate analysis showed well-defined tumor margin (odds ratio: 21.0) and presence of calcification (odds ratio: 4.4) were significant predictors of nonhypervascular PNENs. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the radiological feature model, AP texture model, and PVP texture model were 0.780, 0.855, and 0.929, respectively, based on logistic regression.

CONCLUSION

A well-defined margin and calcification in the tumor were helpful in discriminating nonhypervascular PNENs from PDACs. Texture analysis of contrast-enhanced CT images could be beneficial in differentially diagnosing nonhypervascular PNENs and PDACs.

Complementary role of computed tomography texture analysis for differentiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the portal-venous enhancement phase

Purpose

To assess the role of CT-texture analysis (CTTA) for differentiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PNEN) in the portal-venous phase as compared with visual assessment and tumor-to-pancreas attenuation ratios.

Methods

53 patients (66.1 ± 8.6y) with PDAC and 42 patients (65.5 ± 12.2y) with PNEN who underwent contrast-enhanced CT for primary staging were evaluated. Volumes of interests (VOIs) were set in the tumor tissue at the portal-venous phase excluding adjacent structures. Based on pyradiomics library, 92 textural features were extracted including 1st, 2nd, and higher order features, and then compared between PNEN and PDAC. The visual assessment classified tumors into hypo-, iso-, or hyperdense to pancreas parenchyma or into homogeneous/heterogeneous. Additionally, attenuation ratios between the tumors and the non-involved pancreas were calculated.

Results

8/92 (8.6%) highly significant (p < 0.005) discriminatory textural features between PDAC and PNEN were identified including the 1st order features “median,” “total energy,” “energy,” “10th percentile,” “90th percentile,” “minimum,” “maximum,” and the 2nd order feature “Gray-Level co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) Informational Measure of Correlation (Imc2).” In PNEN, the higher order feature “GLSZM Small Area High Gray-Level Emphasis” proved significantly higher in G1 compared to G2/3 tumors (p < 0.05). The tumor/parenchyma ratios as well as the visual assessment into hypo-/iso-/hyperdense or homogeneous/heterogeneous did not significantly differ between PDAC and PNEN.

Conclusions

Our data indicate that CTTA is a feasible tool for differentiation of PNEN from PDAC and also of G1 from G2/3 PNEN in the portal-venous phase. Visual assessment and tumor-to-parenchyma ratios were not useful for discrimination.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00261-020-02406-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Solid Indeterminate Nodules with a Radiological Stability Suggesting Benignity: A Texture Analysis of Computed Tomography Images Based on the Kurtosis and Skewness of the Nodule Volume Density Histogram

Background

The number of incidental findings of pulmonary nodules using imaging methods to diagnose other thoracic or extrathoracic conditions has increased, suggesting the need for in-depth radiological image analyses to identify nodule type and avoid unnecessary invasive procedures.

Objectives

The present study evaluated solid indeterminate nodules with a radiological stability suggesting benignity (SINRSBs) through a texture analysis of computed tomography (CT) images.

Methods

A total of 100 chest CT scans were evaluated, including 50 cases of SINRSBs and 50 cases of malignant nodules. SINRSB CT scans were performed using the same noncontrast enhanced CT protocol and equipment; the malignant nodule data were acquired from several databases. The kurtosis (KUR) and skewness (SKW) values of these tests were determined for the whole volume of each nodule, and the histograms were classified into two basic patterns: peaks or plateaus.

Results

The mean (MEN) KUR values of the SINRSBs and malignant nodules were 3.37 ± 3.88 and 5.88 ± 5.11, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing SINRSBs from malignant nodules were 65% and 66% for KUR values >6, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.709 (p < 0.0001). The MEN SKW values of the SINRSBs and malignant nodules were 1.73 ± 0.94 and 2.07 ± 1.01, respectively. The ROC curve showed that the sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing malignant nodules from SINRSBs were 65% and 66% for SKW values >3.1, respectively, with an AUC of 0.709 (p < 0.0001). An analysis of the peak and plateau histograms revealed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 84%, 74%, and 79%, respectively.

Conclusions

KUR, SKW, and histogram shape can help to noninvasively diagnose SINRSBs but should not be used alone or without considering clinical data.

Utility of CT Radiomics Features in Differentiation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma From Normal Pancreatic Tissue

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine the utility of radiomics features in differentiating CT cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from normal pancreas. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this retrospective case-control study, 190 patients with PDAC (97 men, 93 women; mean age ± SD, 66 ± 9 years) from 2012 to 2017 and 190 healthy potential renal donors (96 men, 94 women; mean age ± SD, 52 ± 8 years) without known pancreatic disease from 2005 to 2009 were identified from radiology and pathology databases. The 3D volume of the pancreas was manually segmented from the preoperative CT scans by four trained researchers and verified by three abdominal radiologists. Four hundred seventy-eight radiomics features were extracted to express the phenotype of the pancreas. Forty features were selected for analysis because of redundancy of computed features. The dataset was divided into 255 training cases (125 normal control cases and 130 PDAC cases) and 125 validation cases (65 normal control cases and 60 PDAC cases). A random forest classifier was used for binary classification of PDAC versus normal pancreas of control cases. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. RESULTS. Mean tumor size was 4.1 ± 1.7 (SD) cm. The overall accuracy of the random forest binary classification was 99.2% (124/125), and AUC was 99.9%. All PDAC cases (60/60) were correctly classified. One case from a renal donor was misclassified as PDAC (1/65). The sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 98.5%. CONCLUSION. Radiomics features extracted from whole pancreas can be used to differentiate between CT cases from patients with PDAC and healthy control subjects with normal pancreas.

Differentiation of atypical pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: Using whole-tumor CT texture analysis as quantitative biomarkers

Background

To explore the application value of computed tomography (CT) texture analysis in differentiating atypical pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC).

Materials and methods

This single‐center retrospective study was approved by local institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. We retrospectively analyzed 127 patients with 50 PDACs and 77 pNETs in pathology database between January 2012 and May 2017.These patients successfully finished preoperative contrast‐enhanced CT test. Texture parameters (mean, median, 5th, 10th, 25th, 75th, 90th percentiles, skewness, kurtosis and entropy) were extracted from portal images and compared between PDAC and 77 pNET groups using proper statistical method. The optimal parameters for differentiating PDACs and atypical pNETs were gained through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

On the basis of arterial enhancement, 52 pNETs (67%, 52/77) were typical hypervascular and 25 pNETs (32%, 25/77) were atypical hypovascular. Compared with PDACs, atypical pNETs had statistically higher mean, median, 5th, 10th, and 25th percentiles (P = 0.006, 0.024, 0.000, 0.001, 0.021, respectively) and statistically lower skewness (P = 0.017). However, there were no difference for 75th, 90th percentiles, kurtosis and entropy between these two tumors (P = 0.232, 0.415, 0.143, 0.291, respectively). For differentiating PDACs and atypical pNETs, 5th percentile and 5th+skewness were optimal parameters for alone and combined diagnosis, respectively.

Conclusion

Volumetric CT texture features, especially combined diagnosis of 5th+skewness can be used as a quantitative tool to distinguish atypical pNETs from PDACs.