Risk and prognostic factors for endometrial carcinoma after diagnosis of breast or Lynch-associated cancers-A population-based analysis

Clinicopathological and molecular pathological characteristics in tamoxifen‑related endometrial cancer

Tamoxifen (TAM), a selective estrogen receptor modulator, is often used for long-term adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. TAM is known to increase the risk of endometrial cancer (EC); however, the mechanism has not yet been fully elucidated. Therefore, molecular genetic analysis of EC following TAM administration (TAM-related EC) was conducted. A total of 10 samples of TAM-related EC and 20 sporadic EC samples (as controls) were analyzed. Copy number variation analysis was conducted, microsatellite instability (MSI) status was assessed, and mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression was examined immunohistochemically. Copy number variation analysis revealed that KDR, NOTCH1, NTRK1, NTRK3 and PDGFRB were more frequently amplified in TAM-related EC (P=0.039, P<0.001, P=0.011, P=0.006 and P=0.035, respectively). In MSI analysis, 4 cases were classified as MSI-high (40%), which is a higher frequency compared with that among patients with sporadic EC (~10% in Japanese women). Loss of MMR proteins was confirmed in all MSI-high cases. In 1 MSI-high case, a benign lesion of hyperplasia prior to EC development was also MSI-high with loss of some MMR protein expression. Several genes were specifically amplified in TAM-related ECs. Furthermore, TAM-related ECs were frequently MSI-high. Further studies are required to be conclusive; however, the present findings may lead to a reduction of unnecessary gynaecological testing in clinical practice and also encourage the testing for MSI status for optimal individualized treatment.

Risk factors for the development of endometrial lesions in breast cancer patients using tamoxyphen: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

breast cancer is the cancer with the highest incidence in women in Brazil, representing 29.7% of all cancers. More than two thirds of women with breast cancer show expression for hormone receptors, and in these cases, hormone therapy with tamoxifen is indicated, which may represent a risk factor for the development of endometrial cancer (four-fold greater relative risk).

OBJECTIVE

this study aimed to evaluate the association of tamoxifen and the development of endometrial disturbances and to assess possible other associated risk factors.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

a total of 364 breast cancer patients were evaluated, 286 who used tamoxifen and 78 who did not use this hormone therapy. Results: patients who used tamoxifen had a mean follow-up time of 51.42 months similar to those without hormone therapy (p=0.081). A total of 21 (7.3%) women who used tamofixen and no cases among women without hormone therapy presented endometrial changes during follow-up (p=0.01). Despite information regarding obesity was available for only 270 women, obesity was also significantly associated with the development of endometrial changes (p=0.008).

CONCLUSION

furthermore, the association between tamofixen and endometrial changes remained significant (p=0.039) after adjusting for obesity.

Estudo de coorte retrospectivo para avaliação de fatores de risco para desenvolvimento de lesão endometrial em pacientes com câncer da mama em uso de tamoxifeno

RESUMO Introdução: o câncer da mama é o câncer de maior incidência no sexo feminino no Brasil, representando 29,7% de todos os cânceres. Mais de dois terços das mulheres com câncer da mama apresentam expressão para receptores hormonais, estando, nestes casos, indicada a terapia hormonal com tamoxifeno, que pode representar fator de risco para o desenvolvimento do câncer do endométrio (risco relativo quatro vezes maior). Objetivo: este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a associação entre o uso de tamoxifeno e o desenvolvimento de distúrbios endometriais bem como eventuais outros fatores associados. Pacientes e método: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo de 364 pacientes com câncer da mama, das quais 286 utilizaram tamoxifeno e 78 não utilizaram esta hormonioterapia. Resultados: pacientes que usaram tamoxifeno tiveram um seguimento médio de 51,42 meses, semelhante àquelas sem terapia hormonal (p=0,081). Um total de 21 (7,3%) mulheres que usaram tamofixeno e nenhuma mulher sem terapia hormonal apresentaram alterações endometriais durante o seguimento (p=0,01). Nas 270 mulheres que tinham informação sobre obesidade, esta se associou significantemente com o desenvolvimento de alterações endometriais (p=0,008). A associação entre tamofixeno e alterações endometriais permaneceu significante (p=0,039) após ajustar para interação com obesidade. Conclusão: o uso de tamoxifeno no tratamento do câncer da mama esteve associado ao maior risco para desenvolvimento de alterações endometriais especialmente quando associado à obesidade.

Concomitant diagnosis of endometrial and breast cancer - does the sequence matters?

•

Patients suffering from both breast and endometrial cancer seem to have unique characteristics.

•

The sequence of occurrence of malignancies appears to have significance.

•

In patients that endometrial cancer was diagnosed as a second tumor, it tended to present in a more aggressive form.

•

In this group, a longer time interval between diagnoses might offer diagnostic and prophylactic opportunities.

•

No correlation was found to tamoxifen usage among patients.

Objective

To examine whether patients with both breast cancer (BC) and endometrial cancer (EC) have different features of disease, and whether the sequence of appearance of these tumors is correlated with a more aggressive course.

Methods

A retrospective, multi-center observational cohort study of patients treated in two tertiary medical centers between 2014 and 2020. Files of patients who had a co-diagnosis of BC and EC were reviewed and clinical, epidemiological, pathological and genetic characteristics were collected.

Results

67 patients with a co-diagnosis of both malignances were divided into two groups according to primary tumor diagnosis: BC first group (43/67, 64%) and EC first group (24/67, 36%). The time interval between diagnosis of malignancies was significantly longer in the BC first group (mean 144.5 months vs. 67 months, p < 0.05). BRCA mutations were found in higher numbers in the BC first group (27.5% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.18). A significantly higher number of patients in the BC first group had uterine serous carcinoma (USC) histology (44% vs. 12.5%, p < 0.05). This was independent of tamoxifen usage among patients (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.17–2.49).

Conclusions

In patients suffering from both BC and EC, the sequence of occurrence of malignancies has relevance: When EC presents as a second primary tumor, it tends to present in a more aggressive form, independent of previous tamoxifen use. The time interval between the diagnosis of malignancies was significantly longer in this group, offering an opportunity to improve preventive measures to decrease the likelihood of a subsequent lethal second cancer.

Case-case analysis addressing ascertainment bias for multigene panel testing implicates BRCA1 and PALB2 in endometrial cancer

Hereditary endometrial cancer (EC) is most commonly attributed to pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes. Evidence supports the existence of additional genetic risk factors in the context of multiple cancer diagnoses and/or family history of EC. EC patients (n = 5292) referred for diagnostic multigene cancer panel testing were annotated for presence of a pathogenic gene variant; personal history of prior, concurrent, or subsequent cancer of another type; reported family history of Lynch syndrome or EC. The Pearson χ² test was used to assess differences in gene variant prevalence between case sub-groups defined by personal and/or family history of cancer/s, using cases with no family history of Lynch/EC as reference. Another cancer diagnosis was reported for 55% of EC cases. EC cases with a prior and reported family history of Lynch cancer were enriched for variants in MLH1 (p = 3.5 × 10^-7 ), MSH2 (p = 3.1 × 10^-7 ), and PMS2 (p = .02). Consistent with expectations for a breast cancer gene also predisposing to EC, the variant frequency was increased in EC patients with prior BC and family history of EC for BRCA1 (p = 1.7 × 10^-5 ) and PALB2 (p = .0002). Strategic case-case analyses to address cohort ascertainment bias have provided a rationale to direct future studies of candidate hereditary EC genes.

Breast Cancer Patients at Increased Risk of Developing Type II Endometrial Cancer: Relative and Absolute Risk Estimation and Implications for Counseling

Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is a recognized risk factor for endometrial cancer (EC). Emerging literature indicates that it confers a higher risk of type II EC (T2EC) than type I EC (T1EC). Although some surgeons offer a prophylactic hysterectomy to BC patients referred for risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, insufficient evidence prevents this from being the standard practice. We aimed to quantify their absolute risk and relative risk (RR) of developing both EC subtypes and identify a higher-risk group that could be considered for prophylactic hysterectomy.

Methodology

This retrospective service evaluation compared patients diagnosed with BC between 2008 and 2014, who subsequently developed EC within 10 years to those who did not. Absolute risk and RR were calculated using the numbers of regional BC and EC cases within this group, alongside 2009 UK female population and EC incidence statistics. Binary logistic regression generated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for patient- and disease-specific variables.

Results

A total of 45 BC patients developed EC, 24 had T1EC and 21 had T2EC. Their RR of developing EC was greater than that of the general population (RR: 12.44, p < 0.0001). Notably, this was higher for T2EC (RR: 33.96, p < 0.001) than T1EC (RR: 8.63, p < 0.0001). Nonetheless, the absolute risk remained low. Tamoxifen exposure was significantly more prevalent among T2EC patients (adjusted OR: 79.61, p = 0.003). Increased age at BC diagnosis was associated with T1EC (adjusted OR: 1.10, p = 0.043) and T2EC (adjusted OR: 1.13, p = 0.03). Neither smoking status nor family history of BC was significantly associated with any outcome.

Conclusion

Women with BC were more likely to develop T2EC than T1EC, and although the absolute risk was low, the cumulative risk was substantial enough to warrant vigilance. Tamoxifen exposure was significantly predictive of EC, particularly T2EC, and might facilitate risk estimation. Older women at BC diagnosis who receive tamoxifen treatment should be screened and closely monitored for EC. However, given the limitations of normal screening methods for the detection of T2EC, counseling for a prophylactic hysterectomy should also be considered. Clarification of the menopausal status will help make more meaningful recommendations.

Risk and prognostic factors for endometrial carcinoma after diagnosis of breast or Lynch-associated cancers-A population-based analysis

We hypothesized that endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients with a prior cancer diagnosis, after accounting for EC arising after tamoxifen-treated prior breast carcinoma, are more likely to have an underlying genetic basis. We used information from a population-based study to compare measured risk factors, tumor characteristics, survival, and known mismatch repair (MMR) pathogenic variant status for EC subgroups according to prior diagnosis of cancer (none, breast cancer tamoxifen-treated or not, Lynch Syndrome (LS)-associated cancer). Family history of any cancer was increased for EC cases with prior breast cancer, both tamoxifen treated (P = 0.005) and untreated (P = 0.01). EC cases with prior LS-associated cancer more often reported family history of LS-associated cancer (P = 0.04) and breast cancer (P = 0.05). EC patients with a germline pathogenic MMR gene variant were more likely to report a prior cancer than cases with a MMR proficient tumor (P = 0.0001), but more than half (54.5%) of MMR carriers reported no prior cancer. Women developing EC after tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer were significantly more likely to develop EC of malignant mixed mullerian tumor subtype (13.2% vs 2.6%, P = 1.3 × 10-6 ), present with stage IV disease (8.8% vs 1.2%, P = 1.6 × 10-6 ), and have poorer survival (HRadj 1.96; P = 0.001). While report of prior cancer is an indicator of MMR pathogenic variant status, molecular analysis of all ECs at diagnosis is warranted to detect all patients with LS. Results also indicate the importance of longer-term monitoring of women treated with tamoxifen for symptoms of EC, and the need for studies assessing the biological mechanism underlying the poorer prognosis of this subset of EC patients.