Disparities in cancer-related healthcare among people with intellectual disabilities: A population-based cohort study with health insurance claims data

Cancer risks related to intellectual disabilities: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

People with intellectual disabilities (ID) face barriers in cancer care contributing to poorer oncological outcomes. Yet, understanding cancer risks in the ID population remains incomplete.

AIM

To provide an overview of cancer incidence and cancer risk assessments in the entire ID population as well as within ID-related disorders.

METHODS

This systematic review examined cancer risk in the entire ID population and ID-related disorders. We systematically searched PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE for literature from January 1, 2000 to July 15, 2022 using a search strategy combining terms related to cancer, incidence, and ID.

RESULTS

We found 55 articles assessing cancer risks in the ID population at large groups or in subgroups with ID-related syndromes, indicating that overall cancer risk in the ID population is lower or comparable with that of the general population, while specific disorders (e.g., Down's syndrome) and certain genetic mutations may elevate the risk for particular cancers.

DISCUSSION

The heterogeneity within the ID population challenges precise cancer risk assessment at the population level. Nonetheless, within certain subgroups, such as individuals with specific ID-related disorders or certain genetic mutations, a more distinct pattern of varying cancer risks compared to the general population becomes apparent.

CONCLUSION

More awareness, and personalized approach in cancer screening within the ID population is necessary.

Medicaid expansion and palliative care for advanced-stage liver cancer

BACKGROUND

Medicaid expansion (ME) has contributed to transforming the United States healthcare system. However, its effect on palliative care of primary liver cancers remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the association between ME and the receipt of palliative treatment in advanced-stage liver cancer.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with stage IV hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were identified from the National Cancer Database and divided into pre-expansion (2010-2013) and postexpansion (2015-2019) cohorts. Logistic regression identified predictors of palliative treatment. Difference-in-difference (DID) analysis assessed changes in palliative care use between patients living in ME states and patients living in non-ME states.

RESULTS

Among 12,516 patients, 4582 (36.6%) were diagnosed before expansion, and 7934 (63.6%) were diagnosed after expansion. Overall, rates of palliative treatment increased after ME (18.1% [pre-expansion] vs 22.3% [postexpansion]; P < .001) and are more pronounced among ME states. Before expansion, only cancer type and education attainment were associated with the receipt of palliative treatment. Conversely, after expansion, race, insurance, location, cancer type, and ME status (odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% CI, 1.06-1.44; P = .018) were all associated with palliative care. Interestingly, the odds were higher if treatment involved receipt of pain management (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.23-2.43; P = .006). Adjusted DID analysis confirmed increased rates of palliative treatment among patients living in ME states relative to non-ME states (DID, 4.4%; 95% CI, 1.2-7.7; P = .008); however, racial disparities persist (White, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.4-9.8; P = .009; minority, 2.6; 95% CI, -2.5 to 7.6; P = .333).

CONCLUSION

The implementation of ME contributed to increased rates of palliative treatment for patients residing in ME states after expansion. However, racial disparities persist even after ME, resulting in inequitable access to palliative care.

[Cancer in people with an intellectual disability in Germany: prevalence, genetics, and care situation]

Intellectual disability has a prevalence rate of approximately 1% of the population; in Germany, this is around 0.5-1 million people. The life expectancy of this group of people is reduced, with cancer being one of the most common causes of death (approx. 20%). Overall, the risk of cancer and mortality is increased compared to the general population.Certain genetic syndromes predispose to cancer in this vulnerable group, but associated comorbidities or lifestyle could also be risk factors for cancer. People with cognitive impairments are less likely to attend preventive check-ups, and challenges arise in medical care due to physical, communicative, and interactional characteristics. Optimized cooperation between clinical centers for people with disabilities and the respective cancer centers is required in order to tailor the processes to the individual.In Germany, there is a lack of data on the prevalence of cancer entities and the use and need for healthcare services. There is an urgent need to focus attention on cancer prevention, treatment, and research in the vulnerable and heterogeneous group of people with intellectual disabilities suffering from cancer in order to effectively counteract the increase in cancer-related deaths in this population group.The article summarizes specialist knowledge on cancer in people with an intellectual disability, identifies special features of treatment, presents care structures, and derives specific requirements for clinics and research.

Do people with disabilities experience disparities in cancer care? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Over 1.3 billion people, or 16% of the world's population, live with some form of disability. Recent studies have reported that people with disabilities (PwD) might not be receiving state-of-the-art treatment for cancer as their non-disabled peers; our objective was to systematically review this topic.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken to compare cancer outcomes and quality of cancer care between adults with and without disabilities (NIHR Prospero register ID number: CRD42022281506). A search of the literature was performed in July 2022 across five databases: EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CINAHL databases. Peer-reviewed quantitative research articles, published in English from 2000 to 2022, with interventional or observational study designs, comparing cancer outcomes between a sample of adult patients with disabilities and a sample without disabilities were included. Studies focused on cancer screening and not treatment were excluded, as well as editorials, commentaries, opinion papers, reviews, case reports, case series under 10 patients and conference abstracts. Studies were evaluated by one reviewer for risk of bias based on a set of criteria according to the SIGN 50 guidelines. A narrative synthesis was conducted according to the Cochrane SWiM guidelines, with tables summarizing study characteristics and outcomes. This research received no external funding.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were included in the systematic review. Compared to people without disabilities, PwD had worse cancer outcomes, in terms of poorer survival and higher overall and cancer-specific mortality. There was also evidence that PwD received poorer quality cancer care, including lower access to state-of-the-art care or curative-intent therapies, treatment delays, undertreatment or excessively invasive treatment, worse access to in-hospital services, less specialist healthcare utilization, less access to pain medications and inadequate end-of-life quality of care.

DISCUSSION

Limitations of this work include the exclusion of qualitative research, no assessment of publication bias, selection performed by only one reviewer, results from high-income countries only, no meta-analysis and a high risk of bias in 15% of included studies. In spite of these limitations, our results show that PwD often experience severe disparities in cancer care with less guideline-consistent care and higher mortality than people without disabilities. These findings raise urgent questions about how to ensure equitable care for PwD; in order to prevent avoidable morbidity and mortality, cancer care programs need to be evaluated and urgently improved, with specific training of clinical staff, more disability inclusive research, better communication and shared decision-making with patients and elimination of physical, social and cultural barriers.

Malignancies in Prader-Willi Syndrome: Results From a Large International Cohort and Literature Review

CONTEXT

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a complex disorder combining hypothalamic dysfunction, neurodevelopmental delay, hypotonia, and hyperphagia with risk of obesity and its complications. PWS is caused by the loss of expression of the PWS critical region, a cluster of paternally expressed genes on chromosome 15q11.2-q13. As life expectancy of patients with PWS increases, age-related diseases like malignancies might pose a new threat to health.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of malignancies in patients with PWS and to provide clinical recommendations for cancer screening.

METHODS

We included 706 patients with PWS (160 children, 546 adults). We retrospectively collected data from medical records on past or current malignancies, the type of malignancy, and risk factors for malignancy. Additionally, we searched the literature for information about the relationship between genes on chromosome 15q11.2-q13 and malignancies.

RESULTS

Seven adults (age range, 18-55 years) had been diagnosed with a malignancy (acute lymphoblastic leukemia, intracranial hemangiopericytoma, melanoma, stomach adenocarcinoma, biliary cancer, parotid adenocarcinoma, and colon cancer). All patients with a malignancy had a paternal 15q11-13 deletion. The literature review showed that several genes on chromosome 15q11.2-q13 are related to malignancies.

CONCLUSION

Malignancies are rare in patients with PWS. Therefore, screening for malignancies is only indicated when clinically relevant symptoms are present, such as unexplained weight loss, loss of appetite, symptoms suggestive of paraneoplastic syndrome, or localizing symptoms. Given the increased cancer risk associated with obesity, which is common in PWS, participation in national screening programs should be encouraged.

The importance of cancer prevention policies to inform and guide preventative and screening measures for people with intellectual disabilities: The COST project "Cancer- Understanding Prevention in Intellectual Disabilities"

Cancer is a global public health problem, but its exact prevalence in people with intellectual disabilities is still uncertain. This population, with limited health skills and complex health needs, faces many challenges in cancer prevention, screening, timely diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, they are often underrepresented in general cancer prevention and screening policies across Europe, leading to widened disparities in health outcomes and premature mortality. Thus, unified national and local policies are needed to reduce inequalities and promoting a pan-European inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities. Our goal is to raise public awareness of this issue, including the involvement of people with intellectual disabilities, and promote engagement from relevant stakeholders. The COST Action 'Cancer- Understanding Prevention in Intellectual Disabilities' (CUPID) project will address health inequalities faced by people with intellectual disabilities in relation to cancer, and support the development of policy recommendations specifically tailored to their unique cognitive and healthcare needs, having a positive long-term impact on quality of life.

Association of Intellectual Disability with Delayed Presentation and Worse Outcomes in Emergency General Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between intellectual disability and both severity of disease and clinical outcomes among patients presenting with common emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions.

BACKGROUND

Accurate and timely diagnosis of EGS conditions is crucial for optimal management and patient outcomes. Individuals with intellectual disabilities may be at increased risk of delayed presentation and worse outcomes for EGS; however, little is known about surgical outcomes in this population.

METHODS

Using the 2012-2017 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of adult patients admitted for 9 common EGS conditions. We performed multivariable logistic and linear regression to examine the association between intellectual disability and the following outcomes: EGS disease severity at presentation, any surgery, complications, mortality, length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient costs. Analyses were adjusted for patient demographics and facility traits.

RESULTS

Of 1,317,572 adult EGS admissions, 5,062 (0.38%) patients had a concurrent ICD-9/-10 code consistent with intellectual disability. EGS patients with intellectual disabilities had 31% higher odds of more severe disease at presentation compared with neurotypical patients (aOR 1.31; 95% CI 1.17-1.48). Intellectual disability was also associated with a higher rate of complications and mortality, longer lengths of stay, lower rate of discharge to home, and higher inpatient costs.

CONCLUSION

EGS patients with intellectual disabilities are at increased risk of more severe presentation and worse outcomes. The underlying causes of delayed presentation and worse outcomes must be better characterized to address the disparities in surgical care for this often under-recognized but highly vulnerable population.

The impact of social media on guideline-concordant cervical cancer-screening: insights from a national survey

OBJECTIVES

Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality in women, yet routine screenings lead to early detection and sometimes even prevention. Screening is an effective way to prevent cervical cancer, and it has been implemented in many countries and regions worldwide, especially in developed countries. However, the incidence of cervical cancer remains a public health problem due to screening disparities in the population. Social media engagement and overloading of online health information may be the cause of this disparity.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (a national survey conducted by the National Cancer Institute) was used to characterise cervical cancer screening into two dimensions; namely, high-frequency screening and guideline-concordant screening. The differences between these two screening frequency behaviours were compared by applying ordered logistic regression and binary logistic regression, and the mechanisms of guideline-concordant screening were explored.

RESULTS

The factors influencing high-frequency screening and guideline-concordant screening were different. Only self-efficacy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.98, 1.37) had a significant positive association with the high-frequency screening behaviour. Social media engagement (OR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.33, 0.96) was shown to have a significant negative impact on guideline-concordant screening. A theory-based mechanism of screening behaviour found that traditional health perception factors no longer influence guideline-concordant screening behaviour, whereas environmental factors (e.g., social media) significantly reduce guideline-concordant screening behaviour.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this study indicate that while the internet has become the main channel through which women acquire health resources, and social media has become a main platform for people to obtain health information, online information cannot guide people to engage in appropriate healthy behaviours. Overloading of online health information and the digital divide may lead to excessive screening. Consequently, it is important to address the screening disparity caused by health behaviours as a result of environmental factors and the digital divide.

Mortality in residential care facilities for people with disability: a descriptive cross-sectional analysis of statutory notifications in Ireland

OBJECTIVES

To determine incidence of death in residential care facilities for people with disability in Ireland, primary cause of death, associations of facility characteristics and deaths, and to compare characteristics of deaths reported as expected and unexpected.

DESIGN

Descriptive cross-sectional study.

SETTING

All residential care facilities for people with disability operational in Ireland in 2019 and 2020 (n=1356).

PARTICIPANTS

n=9483 beds.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All expected and unexpected deaths notified to the social services regulator. Cause of death as reported by the facility.

RESULTS

395 death notifications were received in 2019 (n=189) and 2020 (n=206). 45% (n=178) were for unexpected deaths. Incidence of death per 1000 beds per year was 20.83 for all, 11.44 for expected and 9.39 for unexpected deaths. Respiratory disease was the most common cause of death, accounting for 38% (n=151) of all deaths. In adjusted negative binomial regression analysis, congregated settings versus non-congregated (incidence rate ratio (95% CI): 2.59 (1.80 to 3.73)) and higher bed numbers (highest vs lowest quartile) (4.02 (2.19 to 7.40)) were positively associated with mortality. There was also a positive n-shaped association with category of nursing staff-to-resident ratio when compared with zero nurses. Emergency services were contacted for 6% of expected deaths. Of the deaths reported as unexpected, 29% were receiving palliative care and 10.8% had a terminal illness.

CONCLUSION

Although incidence of death was low, residents of congregated and larger settings had higher incidence of death than residents of other settings. This should be a consideration for practice and policy. Given the high contribution of respiratory diseases to deaths and the potential avoidability of these, there is a need for improved respiratory health management in this population. Nearly half of all deaths were reported as unexpected; however, overlap in the characteristics of expected and unexpected deaths highlights the need for clearer definitions.

Population-level use of gynecological health services by female youth with intellectual/developmental disabilities in British Columbia Canada

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that female youth with intellectual/developmental disabilities (IDD) experience poorer gynecological care compared to female youth without disabilities.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to obtain baseline data on visits to a health care provider for a gynecological issue for females with IDD and compare that information to the experiences of female youth without IDD.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective cohort study using population-level administrative health data from 2010 to 2019 for females aged 15-24 years, with and without IDD.

RESULTS

6452 female youth with IDD and 637,627 female youth without IDD were identified in the data. Over the ten-year period, 53.77% of youth with IDD and 53.68% of youth without IDD had a visit to a physician for a gynecological issue. However, as females with IDD aged, the number of people seeing a physician for a gynecological issue decreased. In the group aged 20-24 years, 15.25% of females with IDD and 24.47% of females without IDD (p < 0.0001) had a Pap test done at any time; 25.94% of females with IDD had a visit for contraception management and 28.38% of females (p < 0.0001) without IDD had a visit for contraception management. Gynecological care also varied by type of IDD.

CONCLUSIONS

Females with IDD had a similar number of visits for a gynecological issue as female youth without IDD. However, the reasons for visits and the age at which visits occurred differed between youth with and without IDD. As females with IDD transition into adulthood, gynecological care must be maintained and improved.

Trends in low vision service utilisation: A retrospective study based on general population healthcare claims

Purpose

To identify parameters associated with the downward trend in the uptake of Low Vision Services (LVS) in the Netherlands.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on a Dutch national health insurance claims database (Vektis CV) of all adults (≥18 years) who received LVS from 2015 until 2018. Descriptive statistics were used to assess socio‐demographic, clinical and contextual characteristics and other healthcare utilisation of the study population. General estimating equations trends in characteristics and healthcare utilisation were determined over time.

Results

A total of 49,726 unique patients received LVS, but between 2015 and 2018, the number of patients decreased by 15%. The majority was aged 65 years or older (53%), female (54%), had a middle (38%) or low (24%) socio‐economic status and lived in urban areas (68%). Between 2015–2018, significant downward trends were found for treatment with intravitreal injections and lens‐related diseases for LVS patients. For physical comorbidity, utilisation of ophthalmic care, low vision aids and occupational therapy, a significant upward trend was found over time.

Conclusion

The decrease of Dutch LVS patients by 15% between 2015 and 2018 might be explained by a reduced distribution of patients treated with intravitreal injections and patients with lens‐related diseases within the LVS. Compared to 2015, patients were more likely to have physical comorbidity, to see an ophthalmologist and to use low vision aids and occupational therapy in 2016, 2017 and 2018. This might indicate enhanced access to LVS when treated by ophthalmologists or within other medical specialties, or the opposite, i.e., less access when not treated within one of these medical specialties. Future research is needed to examine differences in patterns between LVS users and non‐users further.

Cancer in deceased adults with intellectual disabilities: English population-based study using linked data from three sources

OBJECTIVE

To improve our understanding of cancer in adults with intellectual disabilities.

DESIGN

Population-based study using linked data about deceased adults from the Learning (Intellectual) Disabilities Mortality Review (LeDeR) programme, the national cancer registry and NHS Digital.

SETTING

England.

PARTICIPANTS

1096 adults with intellectual disabilities identified by the LeDeR programme who died between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Any form of cancer listed as a long-term health condition by a LeDeR reviewer or 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases codes C00-D49 included on Parts I or II of the Medical Certificate of Cause of Death.

RESULTS

In decedents with intellectual disabilities and cancer, more than a third (35%; n=162) had cancer diagnosed via emergency presentations. Almost half (45%; n=228) of cancers were at stage IV when diagnosed. More than a third (36%; n=309) of underlying causes of deaths were of cancers of the digestive system; almost half of these (48%; n=147) were cancer of the colon, rectum or anus. Of those who died with colorectal cancer, 43% were below the age threshold for colorectal screening.

CONCLUSIONS

In decedents with intellectual disabilities, symptoms suggestive of cancer had tended to be identified most frequently as an emergency and at a late stage. There is a need for greater awareness of symptoms of cancer in this population, a lower threshold for referral by General Practitioners (GPs), accelerated access to diagnosis and treatment and consideration paid to lowering the age for colorectal screening.

A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators influencing the cancer screening behaviour among people with intellectual disabilities

Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) may require assistance in accessing healthcare services, including cancer screening. A better understanding of the factors affecting cancer screening utilisation among these individuals is needed for the development of strategies to promote screening uptake in them. This review aimed to explore the facilitators of and barriers to cancer screening utilisation among people with ID. A literature search was conducted using five databases, and an additional snowball search yielded 16 studies for inclusion in the review. Overall, the methodological quality of these studies was good (43-100%). In this review, we noted barriers to screening among individuals with ID, including perceptions of fear, distress, and embarrassment; unpreparedness for screening; negative interactions with healthcare professionals; a lack of knowledge about cancer screening; mobility issues; a high severity of ID; and a lack of ability to provide consent and communicate verbally. Facilitators to screening among these individuals were also identified, including living in a supervised setting, prior use of other healthcare services, being educated about screening via social media, having carers accompany them to screening appointments, and having dual insurance coverage or a higher income. Our review highlights the current needs of individuals with ID undergoing cancer screening. Strategies should be developed to address these needs, such as the provision of training to healthcare professionals on how to conduct screening for people with ID.

Cancer-related mortality among people with intellectual disabilities: A nationwide population-based cohort study

Background

Concerns have been raised about access to cancer screening and the timely receipt of cancer care for people with an intellectual disability (ID). However, knowledge about cancer mortality as a potential consequence of these disparities is still limited. This study, therefore, compared cancer‐related mortality patterns between people with and without ID.

Methods

A historical cohort study (2015‐2019) linked the Dutch adult population (approximately 12 million people with an ID prevalence of 1.45%) and mortality registries. Cancer‐related mortality was identified by the underlying cause of death (according to the chapter on neoplasms in the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision). Observed mortality and calculated age‐ and sex‐standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.

Results

There were 11,102 deaths in the ID population (21.7% cancer‐related; n = 2408) and 730,405 deaths in the general population (31.2%; n = 228,120) available for analysis. Cancer was noted as the cause of death more often among people with ID in comparison with the general population (SMR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.42‐1.54), particularly in the young age groups. High‐mortality cancers included cancers within the national screening program (SMRs, 1.43‐1.94), digestive cancers (SMRs, 1.24‐2.56), bladder cancer (SMR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.61‐2.54), and cancers of unknown primary (SMR, 2.48; 95% CI, 2.06‐2.89).

Conclusions

Cancer was reported as the cause of death approximately 1.5 times more often in people with ID compared with the general population. This mortality disparity may indicate adverse effects from inequalities in screening and cancer care experienced by people with ID.

Lay Summary

People with an intellectual disability (ID) may find it challenging to participate in cancer screening or to receive timely cancer care.

To understand potential consequences in terms of mortality, this study compared cancer‐related mortality between people with and without ID in the Netherlands.

Cancer was reported as the cause of death approximately 1.5 times more often among people with ID than others.

Because large differences were found that were related to screening cancers and cancers for which the primary tumor was unknown, this study's results raise concerns about equality in screening practices and cancer care for people with ID.

Cancer is reported as the cause of death approximately 1.5 times more often in people with an intellectual disability compared with those without one. Differences are particularly noted for deaths related to cancers within the national screening program and cancers of unknown primary.

Association of Intellectual Disability With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in Sweden

IMPORTANCE

Knowledge of the health challenges and mortality in people with intellectual disability (ID) should guide health policies and practices in contemporary society.

OBJECTIVE

To examine premature mortality in individuals with ID.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based longitudinal cohort study obtained data from several national health care, education, and population registers in Sweden. Two registers were used to identify individuals with ID: the National Patient Register and the Halmstad University Register on Pupils With Intellectual Disability. Two cohorts were created: cohort 1 comprised young adults (born between 1980 and 1991) with mild ID, and cohort 2 comprised individuals (born between 1932 and 2013) with mild ID or moderate to profound ID; each cohort had matched reference cohorts. Data analyses were conducted between June 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021.

EXPOSURES

Mild or moderate to profound ID.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was overall (all-cause) mortality, and the secondary outcomes were cause-specific mortality and potentially avoidable mortality.

RESULTS

Cohort 1 included 13 541 young adults with mild ID (mean [SD] age at death, 24.53 [3.66] years; 7826 men [57.8%]), and its matched reference cohort consisted of 135 410 individuals. Cohort 2 included 24 059 individuals with mild ID (mean [SD] age at death, 52.01 [16.88] years; 13 649 male individuals [56.7%]) and 26 602 individuals with moderate to profound ID (mean [SD] age at death, 42.16 [21.68] years; 15 338 male individuals [57.7%]); its matched reference cohorts consisted of 240 590 individuals with mild ID and 266 020 with moderate to profound ID. Young adults with mild ID had increased overall mortality risk compared with the matched reference cohort (odds ratio [OR], 2.86; 95% CI, 2.33-3.50), specifically excess mortality in neoplasms (OR, 3.58; 95% CI, 2.02-6.35), diseases of the nervous system (OR, 40.00; 95% CI, 18.43-86.80) and circulatory system (OR, 9.24; 95% CI, 4.76-17.95). Among deaths that were amenable to health care (OR, 7.75; 95% CI, 4.85-12.39), 55% were attributed to epilepsy. In cohort 2, increased risk of overall mortality was observed among both individuals with mild ID (OR, 6.21; 95% CI, 5.79-6.66) and moderate to profound ID (OR, 13.15; 95% CI, 12.52-13.81) compared with the matched reference cohorts. Those with moderate to profound ID had a higher risk in several cause-of-death categories compared with those with mild ID or the matched reference cohort. Adjustment for epilepsy and congenital malformations attenuated the associations. The relative risk of premature death was higher in women (OR, 6.23; 95% CI, 4.42-8.79) than in men (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.53-2.60), but the absolute risk of mortality was similar (0.9% for women vs 0.9% for men).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found excess premature mortality and high risk of deaths with causes that were potentially amenable to health care intervention among people with ID. This finding suggests that this patient population faces persistent health challenges and inequality in health care encounters.

Linking national public services data to estimate the prevalence of intellectual disabilities in The Netherlands: results from an explorative population-based study

OBJECTIVES

Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) depend on public services for daily support and medical care; however, this group of individuals can be difficult to identify within population data. This therefore limits the opportunities to accurately estimate the size of the population with ID, monitor trends and tailor public health interventions according to the needs and characteristics of this group. By linking relevant databases, this study sought to identify individuals with ID in national data, to estimate the prevalence of ID based on public service use and to explore how this method can be used to better monitor the population with ID.

STUDY DESIGN

Explorative data linkage study using the Dutch population register and databases from public services accessible with an ID diagnosis.

METHODS

The overall prevalence of ID in the Dutch adult population was estimated, specified by age group and sex, and the identified ID groups were also characterised by their support needs. Participants included the entire adult Dutch population who were alive on 1 January 2015.

RESULTS

After linking databases, 187,149 adults with ID were identified within a population of almost 12.7 million Dutch adults, giving an ID prevalence estimate of 1.45%. Prevalence of ID was higher among males (1.7%) than females (1.2%). Most individuals with ID were identified through the use of residential care services (n = 91,064; 0.7%). Non-residential ID-related care was used by 27,007 individuals (0.2%). Social, employment or income support due to a (mild) ID was received by 69,078 individuals (0.5%); the mean age in these ID groups was between 8 and 10 years which is younger than that in the general Dutch population. ID prevalence declined with increasing age across all ID subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The ID prevalence in The Netherlands, as determined by ID-related public service usage, aligns with international estimates. This suggests that national supportive services are accessible and used by individuals with ID. Moreover, this demonstrated that databases from national supportive services can be a useful resource to identify individuals with ID at the population level and can enable structural monitoring of the ID population through linking national databases.

Patterns in the prevalence of diabetes and incidence of diabetic complications in people with and without an intellectual disability in Dutch primary care: Insights from a population-based data-linkage study

AIMS

To conduct an epidemiological analysis of patterns observed in diabetes care provided to individuals with and without intellectual disabilities (ID) in primary care settings.

METHODS

An ID-cohort (N = 21,203) was compared with a control group of similar age and sex from the general Dutch population (N = 267,628). Distinctive data for diabetes (both type 1 and type 2) and related complications were retrieved from national databases.

RESULTS

The prevalence of diabetes was higher in people with ID than in the general population (9.9% versus 6.6%). Largest differences were seen in younger age groups. Women with ID had diabetes more often than men with ID. Complications were less common in people with ID than in the general population (IR 58.6 vs. 70.4). In particular, cardiological complications were noted less, while surgical interventions and hospitalization occurred more often.

CONCLUSIONS

Although diabetes was 1.5 times more prevalent in people with ID than in other people, related complications were less common, followed different patterns and were more severe than in the general population. Future research is needed to understand of the underlying causal mechanisms and to lower the risk of severe diabetic complications among people with ID.

Disparities in cancer-related healthcare among people with intellectual disabilities: A population-based cohort study with health insurance claims data

Background

Concerns have been raised about the accessibility and quality of cancer‐related care for people with intellectual disabilities (ID). However, there is limited insight into cancer incidence and the utilization of cancer care at the ID population level to inform targeted cancer control strategies. Therefore, we aimed to examine differences in the utilization of cancer‐related care between people with and without ID, identified through diagnostic codes on health insurance claims.

Methods

In a population‐based cohort study, Dutch individuals of all ages who received residential care through the Chronic Care Act due to an ID (n = 65 183) and an age and sex‐matched sample of persons without ID (1:2 ratio), who were cancer‐free at enrollment in 2013 were followed through 2015. Incidence rates (IRs) of newly started cancer care and IR ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs were used to compare groups. Separate analyses were performed per cancer type.

Results

Individuals with ID received less cancer‐related care than individuals without (IRR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.62‐0.66). Differences increased with age and were larger for females than for males. Utilization of care for cancers within the national screening program (female breast, cervical, and colon cancer) was lower for people with ID compared to people without ID.

Conclusion

Cancer may be underdiagnosed and/or undertreated in people with ID, or cancer is truly less prevalent in this population. In particular, the differences detected between males and females with ID, and the potential underutilization of national screening programs, require urgent follow‐up investigations.