Real-world treatment patterns of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Association between epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and venous thromboembolism among older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk is higher among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and specific subgroups, including the elderly, but little is known about the VTE risk of different generations of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and whether the risk differs by demographic characteristics. This study aims to compare the risk of VTE (deep venous thromboembolism [DVT]; pulmonary embolism [PE]) between a third-generation EGFR-TKI and first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and stratify VTE risk by sex, age, and race/ethnicity in third-generation EGFR-TKI users.

METHODS

Via the 2006-2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, this retrospective cohort study included older patients (aged ≥65 years) with advanced NSCLC who initiated on a third-generation EGFR-TKI (n = 493) and first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (n = 1036). We estimated the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) with the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A third-generation EGFR-TKI had a significantly higher VTE risk than first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.01-1.57]; p = .037), with an elevated risk in males (HR, 2.16 [95% CI, 1.47-3.19]; p < .001), patients aged ≥75 years (HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.04-1.83]; p = .026), and non-Hispanic Whites (HR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.10-1.95]; p = .010). Males consistently showed a significantly higher risk of DVT (HR, 2.49 [95% CI, 1.29-4.80]; p = .007) and PE (HR, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.29-3.11]; p = .002). A significantly higher risk of DVT (HR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.00-2.37]; p = .050) and PE (HR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.06-2.05]; p = .021) was shown in patients aged ≥75 years and non-Hispanic Whites, respectively. Among third-generation EGFR-TKI users, non-Hispanic Whites had a significantly higher risk of VTE (HR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.03-4.02]; p = .041) and PE (HR, 2.88 [95% CI, 1.24-6.70]; p = .014) than non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders.

CONCLUSIONS

Close monitoring of VTE events in high-risk patients is essential to promote early diagnosis and treatment.

Real-world outcomes on platinum-containing chemotherapy for EGFR-mutated advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with prior exposure to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Background

Front-line therapy with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is the standard of care for treating patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with the common sensitizing EGFR exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R point mutations. However, EGFR TKI resistance inevitably develops. The optimal subsequent therapy remains to be identified, although platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens are often administered. Our objectives were to describe baseline characteristics, survival, and subsequent treatment patterns for patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation who received a platinum-based combination regimen after front-line EGFR TKI therapy.

Methods

This retrospective study used a nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database to select adult patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, evidence of EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation, and ECOG performance status of 0-2 who initiated platinum-containing chemotherapy, with or without concomitant immunotherapy, from 1-January-2011 to 30-June-2020 following receipt of any EGFR TKI as first-line therapy or, alternatively, a first- or second-generation EGFR TKI (erlotinib, afatinib, gefitinib, dacomitinib) as first-line therapy followed by the third-generation EGFR TKI osimertinib as second-line therapy. Data cut-off was 30-June-2022. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) after initiation of pemetrexed-platinum (n=119) or any platinum-based combination regimen (platinum cohort; n=311).

Results

The two cohorts included two-thirds women (65%-66%) and 57%-58% nonsmokers; median ages were 66 and 65 years in pemetrexed-platinum and platinum cohorts, respectively. Median OS was 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.1-13.9) from pemetrexed-platinum initiation and 12.4 months (95% CI, 10.2-15.2) from platinum initiation; 12-month survival rates were 48% and 51%, respectively; 260 patients (84%) had died by the end of the study.

Conclusion

The suboptimal survival outcomes recorded in this study demonstrate the unmet need to identify more effective subsequent treatment regimens for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced nonsquamous NSCLC after EGFR TKI resistance develops.

Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Disease Progression on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Final Results of CheckMate 722

PURPOSE

The phase III CheckMate 722 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02864251) evaluated nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after disease progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

Patients with disease progression after first- or second-generation EGFR TKI therapy (without EGFR T790M mutation) or osimertinib (with/without T790M mutation) were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (360 mg once every 3 weeks) plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy (once every 3 weeks) or platinum-doublet chemotherapy alone (once every 3 weeks) for four cycles. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included 9- and 12-month PFS rates, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR).

RESULTS

Overall, 294 patients were randomly assigned. At final analysis (median follow-up, 38.1 months), PFS was not significantly improved with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy (median, 5.6 v 5.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.56 to 1.00]; P = .0528), with 9- and 12-month PFS rates of 25.9% versus 19.8%, and 21.2% versus 15.9%, respectively. Post hoc PFS subgroup analyses showed a trend favoring nivolumab plus chemotherapy in patients with tumors harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97]), one line of previous EGFR TKI (0.72 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97]), or both (0.64 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88]). Median OS was 19.4 months with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus 15.9 months with chemotherapy, while ORR was 31.3% versus 26.7%, and median DOR was 6.7 versus 5.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 44.7% and 29.4% of patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab plus chemotherapy did not significantly improve PFS versus chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC previously treated with EGFR TKIs. No new safety signals were identified.

Outcomes of patients with advanced epithelial growth factor receptor mutant lung cancer treated with first-line osimertinib who would not have met the eligibility criteria for the FLAURA clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Osimertinib is largely used as first-line therapy for metastatic epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung cancers based on the FLAURA clinical trial. Real-world patient outcomes often differ from clinical trial outcomes. This study evaluated the efficacy of first-line osimertinib in patients treated in British Columbia (BC), Canada. Furthermore, we compared the outcomes of patients who would and would not have been eligible for the original FLAURA trial.

METHODS

Consecutive patients receiving first-line osimertinib for metastatic EGFR exon19 or L858R lung cancer were identified using the BC Cancer Pharmacy Database. Patient eligibility for the FLAURA clinical trial were retrospectively reviewed based on the following criteria: ECOG ≥ 2, symptomatic brain metastases or on steroids, hemoglobin < 90 g/L, platelets < 100x109/L, or a creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min. mOS was assessed for the entire population and compared between patients who would have been eligible and ineligible for FLAURA.

RESULTS

From January 2020 to October 2021, 311 patients received first-line osimertinib; 44 % (137/311) were deemed FLAURA ineligible, predominantly due to low ECOG (n = 120). After a median follow-up of 26.5 months, the mOS for the entire cohort was 27.4 months (95 %CI 23.8-30.1). The mOS for ineligible patients was 18 months shorter than eligible patients (15.8 vs 34.2, p < 0.001). Ineligible patients had higher rates of de novo stage IV disease, higher rates of stage IVB disease, and more sites of disease than eligible patients.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world population, nearly half of patients would have been ineligible for FLAURA. The mOS was one year shorter than reported in FLAURA. However, patients who would have been eligible for the FLAURA clinical trial had similar OS to patients enrolled in FLAURA. Trial ineligible patients had a higher burden of disease at baseline which may have led to inferior outcomes. Further research is needed to improve outcomes in these patients.

Real-world drug utilization and treatment patterns in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumors in the USA

Aim: Real-world treatment patterns in tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) patients remain unknown. Pexidartinib is the only US FDA-approved treatment for TGCT associated with severe morbidity or functional limitations and not amenable to improvement with surgery. Objective: To characterize drug utilization and treatment patterns in TGCT patients. Methods: In a retrospective observational study using IQVIA's linked prescription and medical claims databases (2018-2021), TGCT patients were stratified by their earliest systemic therapy claim (pexidartinib [N = 82] or non-FDA-approved systemic therapy [N = 263]). Results: TGCT patients treated with pexidartinib versus non-FDA-approved systemic therapies were predominantly female (61 vs 50.6%) and their median age was 47 and 54 years, respectively. Pexidartinib-treated patients had the highest 12-month probability of remaining on treatment (54%); 34.1% of pexidartinib users had dose reduction after their first claim. Conclusion: This study provides new insights into the unmet need, utilization and treatment patterns of systemic therapies for the treatment of TGCT patients.

Effectiveness comparison of third-generation EGFR-TKI as initial and sequential therapy in adjuvant treatment for EGFR mutation-sensitive stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer after surgery

Introduction

Although third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) Osimertinib has been approved as adjuvant therapy for resected stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR-sensitive mutations, the optimal treatment sequencing of EGFR-TKIs, particularly whether Osimertinib should be the initial or sequential therapy following the first-generation EGFR-TKIs remains uncertain.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of patients with EGFR-mutated stage IIIA NSCLC who received treatment with either first-generation EGFR-TKIs or Osimertinib (third-generation) alone, or in sequential combination, at a single institution. The data analysis involved using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression.

Results

Out of the total 148 patients with stage IIIA NSCLC included in the study, 76 individuals underwent treatment with either first-generation EGFR-TKIs (referred to as subgroup "1″) or exclusively Osimertinib (subgroup "0 + 3″), or a sequential combination of the two (subgroup "1 + 3″) following surgery. Both univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that there were no discernible disparities in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival between subgroup " 1″ and " 1 + 3," nor between subgroup " 0 + 3″ and "1 + 3".

Conclusion

The findings from this study indicate that the introduction of third-generation EGFR-TKI Osimertinib did not yield enhanced survival benefits when compared to the first-generation drug in patients with stage IIIA completely resected NSCLC who were administered EGFR-TKIs as part of their postoperative adjuvant treatment. Additionally, within the observed sample size of this cohort, the sequential use of Osimertinib alongside first-generation EGFR-TKI did not demonstrate superiority over using either the first-generation EGFR-TKI or Osimertinib alone in terms of postoperative survival.

Survival Analysis of 159 Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Resistant to First-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have limited or no response in some certain patients of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, real-world survival analyses comparing clinical data and EGFR-plasma mutation are still lacking.

Methods

In total, 159 patients with advanced NSCLC resistant to first-generation EGFR-TKIs were included for consecutive blood sampling in this study. Super-amplification refractory mutation system (Super-ARMS) was used to detect EGFR-plasma mutations and correlations between survival and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were analyzed.

Results

Among 159 eligible patients, the T790M mutation was detected in 27.0% (43/159) of patients. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 10.7 months in all patients. Survival analysis revealed that patients with the T790M mutation had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than those with the T790M wild-type (10.6 months vs 10.8 months, P = .038). Patients who cleared EGFR-plasma mutation had prolonged PFS compared with those with nonclearing EGFR-plasma mutation (11.6 months vs 9.0 months, P = .001). Cox multivariate analysis showed that the nonclearance of EGFR-plasma mutations was an independent risk factor for PFS (RR = 1.745, 95% CI: [1.184, 2.571], P = .005). The T790M mutation was associated with nonclearance of the EGFR-plasma mutation (χ2 = 10.407, P = .001).

Conclusion

Patients with advanced NSCLC who were resistant to the first-generation EGFR-TKI had a prolonged PFS with clearance of EGFR-plasma mutation. Those nonclearers were more likely to harbor T790M mutations in plasma.