Ensartinib is effective in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with MET amplification after multi-line ALK-TKIs resistance: a case report

Although patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are initially effective on treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), resistance will inevitably develop. Of these patients, 2/3 will develop ALK-independent resistance and little is known about the mechanisms of ALK-independent resistance. In pre-clinical studies, the activation of several bypass signaling pathways has been implicated in the development of resistance, including the MET, EGFR, SRC and IGF1R pathways. Among these, the MET pathway is one of the signaling pathways that has recently been extensively studied, and activation of this pathway is one of the mechanisms of ALK-independent drug resistance. Here, we report a successful case of an advanced NSCLC patient who was resistant to treatment with ALK TKIs and developed MET amplification, who achieved 23 months of progression-free survival after post-line treatment with ensartinib.

Cost-effectiveness of tumor-treating fields plus standard therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer progressed after platinum-based therapy in the United States

Background: Tumor treating fields (TTF) was first approved for treatment of glioblastoma. Recently, the LUNAR study demonstrated that TTF + standard therapy (ST) extended survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This primary objective of this study is to analyze the cost-effectiveness of this treatment from the United States healthcare payers' perspective. Methods: A 3-health-state Markov model was established to compare the cost-effectiveness of TTF + ST and that of ST alone. Clinical data were extracted from the LUNAR study, supplemented by additional cost and utility data obtained from publications or online sources. One-way sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and scenario analysis were conducted. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained was set to $150,000. The main results include total costs, QALYs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB). Subgroup analyses were conducted for two types of ST, including immune checkpoint inhibitor, and docetaxel. Results: During a 10-year time horizon, the costs of TTF + ST and ST alone were $431,207.0 and $128,125.9, and the QALYs were 1.809 and 1.124, respectively. The ICER of TTF + ST compared to ST was $442,732.7 per QALY, and the INMB was -$200,395.7 at the WTP threshold. The cost of TTF per month was the most influential factor in cost-effectiveness, and TTF + ST had a 0% probability of being cost-effective at the WTP threshold compared with ST alone. Conclusion: TTF + ST is not a cost-effective treatment for advanced NSCLC patients who progressed after platinum-based therapy from the perspective of the United States healthcare payers.

Clinical efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal injections in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 140 randomized controlled trials

Background and aim

Chinese herbal injection (CHI) is a widely used preparation for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment to alleviate the adverse drug reactions and enhance the clinical efficacy of chemotherapy. However, its efficacy and safety in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) remain poorly understood owing to the lack of high-level evidence in the face of a wide variety of CHIs. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of CHIs in combination with PBC regimens in the treatment of mid- and advanced NSCLC.

Methods

Systematic evaluation and meta-analysis were conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Project for Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). Seven databases were comprehensively searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through August 1, 2022. The quality of each study was evaluated based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Statistical analysis was performed using Revman 5.3, with dichotomies expressed as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were selected as the primary outcomes, with quality of life (QoL) and toxic side effects as secondary outcomes.

Results

A total of 140 RCTs were included in this study. The results of the meta-analysis suggested that, compared with PBC alone, PBC combined with CHIs significantly improved the ORR (RR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.30-1.41, P<0.001), DCR (RR=1.15, 95% CI: 1.13-1.18, P<0.001) and QoL (RR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.24-1.33, P<0.001). Moreover, the combination treatment reduced chemotherapy-induced leukopenia (RR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.64-0.75, P<0.001), anemia (RR=0.70, 95% CI: 0.62-0.79, P<0.001), thrombocytopenia (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.62-0.75, P<0.001), nausea and vomiting (RR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.63-0.76, P<0.001), diarrhea (RR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.48-0.73, P<0.001), and constipation (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.54-0.86, P=0.001).

Conclusion

According to the available evidence, CHIs in combination with PBC can improve clinical efficacy and reduce the toxic side effects in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. However, considering the study's limitations, more rigorous and high-quality studies are needed to further confirm the results.

Systematic review registration

https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-1-0104/, identifier INPLASY202210104.

Mycobacterium gordonae Infection in a Patient With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Mycobacterium gordonae (MG) is one of the least pathogenic nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). We report an unusual case of MG infection in a patient with newly diagnosed lung cancer. A 61-year-old woman presented with shortness of breath and weight loss. Six months prior to admission, she was diagnosed with MG infection based on positive sputum cultures and bronchioalveolar lavage. Despite anti-mycobacterial therapy, her symptoms worsened and she lost approximately 100 pounds. A transbronchial biopsy obtained one week prior to admission revealed adenocarcinoma of the lung. At admission, vital signs were normal, and a physical exam revealed bilateral crackles. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest revealed infiltrates with ground-glass opacity. The patient was admitted to the oncology service for evaluation. Our findings suggest that symptomatic individuals with positive cultures of MG should proceed with extensive workup for possible underlying lung cancer especially if not responding to anti-mycobacterial therapy.

Corrigendum: Soluble PD-L1 changes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors: an individual patient data meta-analysis

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1308381.].

Soluble PD-L1 changes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors: an individual patient data meta-analysis

Introduction

Currently, first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, are utilized as monotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with high programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression (≧50%). Pre-treatment or post-treatment serum soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) has been identified as a potential biomarker for assessing ICI efficacy through fixed-point observations. However, existing studies on sPD-L1 changes have produced inconsistent results or have had sample sizes too small to detect clinically meaningful effect sizes. To elucidate the role of sPD-L1, we conducted a collaborative individual patient data meta-analysis of PD-1 inhibitor treatments.

Methods

We conducted a thorough search of articles in PubMed via Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from inception to October 20, 2023. Trials were deemed eligible if they contained individual datasets for advanced NSCLC patients, including data on overall survival (OS)/progression-free survival (PFS), as well as pre- and post-treatment sPD-L1 levels after 3-4 cycles of PD-1 inhibitor treatments. Our analysis focused on patients who completed 3-4 cycles of PD-1 inhibitor treatments. The primary outcome measure was OS/PFS, and we assessed changes in sPD-L1 concentration pre- and post-treatment through ELISA analyses.

Results

From our search, we identified a potential seven trials, encompassing 256 patients. Among these, two trials with 26 patients met the criteria for inclusion in our primary analyses. Over a median follow-up period of 10 months, pooled univariate analysis revealed that increases in sPD-L1 levels during PD-1 inhibitor treatment were not associated with OS (HR = 1.25; CI: 0.52-3.02)/PFS (HR = 1.42; CI: 0.61-3.30) when compared to cases with sPD-L1 decreases. Subgroup analyses indicated that the impact of sPD-L1 changes on overall mortality/progression-related mortality remained consistent regardless of gender, age, or the type of treatment (nivolumab or pembrolizumab).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that changes in sPD-L1 levels during PD-1 inhibitor treatment do not significantly influence the prognosis of advanced NSCLC patients, regardless of gender, age, or treatment type. Continuous monitoring of sPD-L1 may not offer significant advantages compared to fixed-point observations.

Pembrolizumab Every 6 Weeks Versus Every 3 Weeks in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The survival benefits and adverse effects of pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks (Q3W) in advanced non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) are well documented in the literature. Based on pharmacokinetic models, a pembrolizumab 4 mg/kg IV every 6 weeks (Q6W) dosing regimen is also approved in some countries. To date, there is no direct comparison in the literature between these 2 regimens in advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 80 patients with advanced NSCLC who received pembrolizumab monotherapy 4 mg/kg Q6W between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021 and 80 patients with advanced NSCLC who received pembrolizumab monotherapy 2 mg/kg Q3W between January 1, 2017 and January 15, 2019 at Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ). The primary outcomes of this study were to compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) as well as the occurrence and severity of immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) in patients with advanced NSCLC who received pembrolizumab Q6W vs Q3W. Data cutoff date was December 15, 2022.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 14.5 ± 8.6 months in the Q6W group and 18.3 ± 19.6 months in the Q3W group. Median PFS was 6.9 months (CI 95% 5.0-10.7) in the Q6W group vs 8.9 months (CI 95% 5.6-14.1) in the Q3W group (adjusted HR 1.27 (CI 95% 0.85-1.89), P = .25). Median OS was not reached in the Q6W group vs 20.5 months (CI 95% 13.7-29.8) in the Q3W group (adjusted HR 0.80 (CI 95% 0.50-1.29), P = .36). Immune-mediated AEs of grade ≥ 3 occurred in 18% of patients in the Q6W group and in 19% of those in the Q3W group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this unicentric retrospective study, the pembrolizumab Q6W dosing regimen was comparable to the Q3W in terms of OS, PFS, and toxicity.

A real-world study of recombinant human endostatin combined with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer negative for actionable molecular biomarkers

The ongoing ENPOWER study exploring the efficacy and safety of the recombinant human endostatin (endostar) combined with programmed cell death 1 antibody sintilimab and chemotherapy showed encouraging efficacy and safety in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. To evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of endostar combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor and chemotherapy (EIC) for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients negative for actionable molecular biomarkers (NSCLCnm), patients with advanced NSCLCnm hospitalized to Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were screened for eligibility. The included patients were analyzed for the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The pre- and posttreatment expression levels of serum tumor associated biomarkers, chemokines and subpopulations of immune cells in peripheral blood were compared. For the 31 patients with advanced NSCLCnm treated with EIC, the median follow-up and treatment cycles were 18.0 months and 4, respectively. The ORR and DCR were 38.7% and 90.3%, respectively. For those who received EIC as first-line treatment, the ORR and DCR were 63.2% and 94.7%, respectively. EIC significantly decreased expression levels of carcinoma antigen 125, carcinoma embryonic antigen and cytokeratin 19 (P<0.05) in patients who were partial remission or stable disease. Among the 31 patients, 27 (87.1%) experienced at least 1 treatment-related adverse events, and 13 (41.9%) had the treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher. No antiangiogenesis-related adverse events were observed. The current study showed that EIC was potentially effective for patients with NSCLCnm, especially when used as first-line therapy, and well tolerated.

Exploring the implications of modified advanced lung cancer inflammation index on outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Aim

Sarcopenia and skeletal muscle density (SMD) have been shown to be both predictive and prognostic marker in oncology. Advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) has been shown to predict overall survival (OS) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Computed tomography (CT) enables skeletal muscle to be quantified, whereas body mass index (BMI) cannot accurately reflect body composition. The purpose was to evaluate the prognostic value of modified ALI (mALI) using CT-determined third lumbar vertebra (L3) muscle index beyond original ALI and see the interaction between sarcopenia, SMD, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), ALI and mALI at baseline and post 4 cycles of chemotherapy and their effects on OS and progress free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced non-SCLC (NSCLC).

Methods

This retrospective study consisted of a total of 285 advanced NSCLC patients. The morphometric parameters such as SMD, skeletal muscle index (SMI) and fat-free mass (FFM) were measured by CT at the L3 vertebra. ALI was defined as BMI × serum albumin/NLR and mALI was defined as SMI × serum albumin/NLR.

Results

Sarcopenia was observed in over 70% of patients across all BMI categories. Patients having sarcopenia suffered from a higher incidence of chemotherapeutic drug toxicities but this was not found to be statistically significant. Concordance was seen between ALI and mALI in the pre-treatment setting and this was statistically significant. A significant proportion of patients with poor ALI (90.9%), poor pre-chemotherapy mALI (91.3%) and poor post-chemotherapy mALI (89%) had poor NLR and each of them was statistically significant.

Conclusions

In both univariate and multivariate analyses, this study demonstrated the statistical significance of sarcopenia, SMD, and mALI as predictive factors for OS. Additionally, sarcopenia and SMD were also found to be statistically significant factors in predicting PFS. These biomarkers could potentially help triage patients for active nutritional intervention for better outcomes.

Perspectives of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer on symptoms, impacts on daily activities, and thresholds for meaningful change: a qualitative research study

Introduction

Advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with significant symptom burden. It is important to understand the impact of these disease-and treatment-related symptoms on patients' daily lives and explore from a patient perspective what constitutes a meaningful change in NSCLC symptoms.

Methods

Patient experience of advanced or metastatic NSCLC was explored in this prospective, non-interventional qualitative research study recruiting patients from the United States (US). Interviews were conducted to explore the most important symptoms, daily life impacts, and patients' perspectives of what constitutes meaningful change when considering their current symptoms versus 6-12 months prior, based on the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) items.

Results

Between February and April 2022, 19 US-based patients with Stage IV NSCLC were recruited; 95% were female, 63% were White, 79% had been diagnosed >1 year prior, and 63% were receiving targeted therapy. Over half the patients indicated their most important symptoms were fatigue, shortness of breath, and cough. Patient differentiation between whether symptoms were disease- or treatment-related lacked concordance, and often patients were unable to distinguish the two. The most frequently mentioned impacts of these symptoms on patients' daily lives were difficulty walking, sleep disturbance, anxiety/depression, impact on relationships, and difficulty doing daily tasks. Most patients considered a one-point change on the PGI-S or PGI-C to be meaningful based on rating their symptom severity at the time of the interview compared with 6-12 months before the interview.

Conclusion

Based on their own symptom experience, patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC indicated a one-point threshold for meaningful change, whether improvement or worsening. This suggests a one-point change on the PGI-S or PGI-C may be a potential anchor for patient-reported outcome (PRO) endpoints used in clinical trials. It is important to use PRO instruments that capture the symptoms and impacts identified as most important to patients. These findings highlight the importance of using qualitative methods to assess disease-related symptoms, treatment-related side effects, and the impacts on daily life for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, underscoring how qualitative assessments can complement quantitative PRO instruments for evaluating clinical trials.

Cost-Effectiveness of Lorlatinib for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Spain

Purpose

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of lorlatinib compared to alectinib and brigatinib for the treatment of adult patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously not treated, in Spain.

Methods

A partitioned survival model comprised progression free, non-intracranial progression, intracranial progression, and death health states was constructed to estimate the total costs, life-years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) accumulated in a lifetime horizon. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for lorlatinib were obtained from the CROWN study. For alectinib and brigatinib, a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted to estimate OS and PFS hazard ratios versus crizotinib. Utilities were estimated based on EQ-5D-5L data derived from the CROWN (lorlatinib), ALEX (alectinib) and ALTA-1L (brigatinib) studies. According to the Spanish National Health Service perspective the total costs (expressed in euros using a 2021 cost year) included drug acquisition and the administration's subsequent treatment, ALK+ advanced NSCLC management and adverse-event management, and palliative care. Unitary costs were obtained from local cost databases and literature. Costs, LYGs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to test the model's robustness.

Results

Lorlatinib provided higher health outcomes (+0.70 LYG/patient, +1.42 QALYs/patient) and lower costs (-€9239/patient) than alectinib. Lorlatinib yielded higher LYG (+1.74) and QALYs (+2.30) versus brigatinib but higher costs/patient (+€36,627), resulting in an incremental-cost-effectiveness-ratio of €15,912/QALY gained.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that lorlatinib may be a dominant treatment option versus alectinib. Considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of €25,000/QALY, lorlatinib may be an efficient option compared to brigatinib.

Adverse Side Effects of Crizotinib in the Treatment of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with the majority consisting of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Genetic mutations present an opportunity for targeted therapy, in addition to current mainstay treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Overall, 5% of NSCLCs have an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation, often prevalent in a younger population. Crizotinib is an ALK inhibitor that was approved to treat ALK-mutated advanced NSCLC. While common side effects such as nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea are mostly well tolerated, adverse side effects can lead to treatment discontinuation or adjustment or can be fatal. This systematic review used articles searched on Google Scholar and PubMed which were assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. This yielded nine papers consisting of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Side effects resulting in cessation of treatment or dose reduction included liver dysfunction, nausea, neutropenia, and QT prolongation. This review showed that crizotinib has a better side effect profile than chemotherapy in ALK-positive NSCLC, even though toxicities leading to treatment withdrawal are present. Adverse effects were tackled by dose reduction, temporary withdrawal from treatment, and close monitoring.

The benefit and risk of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials

Background

Previous studies revealed that Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/Programmed cell death-Ligand protein 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents had extensive anti-tumor activities. However, almost all studies on the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer are non-randomized controlled trials with small sample sizes, which might lead to a lack of effective metrics to assess the effectiveness and safety of the therapeutic regimen. Here, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

A single-arm meta-analysis was performed, and published literature from PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases as of January 13, 2023, was systematically retrieved. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool and methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) Methodological items to evaluate the quality of eligible clinical trials. Outcomes including overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were extracted for further analysis. The random effect model is used to calculate the pooled parameters.

Results

19 studies (16 were non-comparative single-arm clinical trials and 3 were randomized controlled trials) were enrolled in this meta-analysis. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR and DCR were 22.4% (95% CI, 16.6-28.1%) and 76.8% (95% CI, 72.6-81.1%), respectively. With regard to survival analysis, the pooled PFS and OS were 5.20 (95% CI, 4.46-5.93) months and 14.09 (95% CI, 13.20-14.97) months, respectively. The pooled grade ≥3 adverse effect (AE) rate was 47.6% (95% CI, 33.1-62.0%).

Conclusion

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents has promising efficacy and safety as second or later-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023407559.

The cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background: The EMPOWER-LUNG 3 clinical trial has shown that cemiplimab plus chemotherapy (CCT) significantly extended overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with advanced non-small cell cancer (NSCLC) compared to placebo plus chemotherapy (PCT). However, the cost-effectiveness of this new treatment option remains unknown. Thus, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of CCT versus (vs.) PCT as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Methods: We constructed a Markov model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CCT as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC. The transition probabilities were extracted from the survival data of the EMPOWER-LUNG 3 trial. The drugs' costs were referred from national tender prices, while other model input parameters were derived from the EMPOWER-LUNG 3 trial and published literature. The outcome parameters mainly included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate the robustness of the model outcomes. Results: Compared to PCT, in the CCT regimen, an additional $79,667 was spent in terms of the total cost and with an additional 0.31 QALYs, resulting in an ICER value of $253,148/QALY. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the hazard ratio (HR) of OS, the cost of cemiplimab (100 mg), and the HR of PFS, all significantly impacted the model's results. The probability of CCT (vs. PCT) being cost-effective was 0% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $38,201/QALYs in China. The scenario analysis showed that when the price of cemiplimab was reduced to less than $184.09/100 mg, the CCT regimen could be considered cost-effective as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC compared to the PCT. Conclusion: In China, the CCT was not cost-effective as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Quality of life with cemiplimab plus chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Patient-reported outcomes from phase 3 EMPOWER-Lung 3

BACKGROUND

EMPOWER-Lung 3, a randomized 2:1 phase 3 trial, showed clinically meaningful and statistically significant overall survival improvement with cemiplimab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. This study evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

METHODS

PROs were assessed at day 1 (baseline), the start of each treatment cycle (every 3 weeks) for the first six doses, and then at start of every three cycles, using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life-Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13) questionnaires. Prespecified analyses included a longitudinal mixed-effect model comparing treatment arms and a time to definitive clinically meaningful deterioration (TTD) analysis performed for global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) and all scales from the questionnaires. Between-arm TTD comparisons were made using a stratified log-rank test and proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 312 patients were assigned to receive cemiplimab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy and 154 to receive placebo plus chemotherapy; 391 (83.9%) were male and the median age was 63.0 years (range, 25-84). For pain symptoms (EORTC QLQ-C30), a statistically significant overall improvement from baseline (-4.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] -8.36 to -1.60, p = .004) and a statistically significant delay in TTD (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.26-0.60, p < .0001) favoring cemiplimab plus chemotherapy were observed. Statistically significant delays in TTD, all favoring cemiplimab plus chemotherapy, were also observed in functioning and symptom scales. A significant overall improvement from baseline in GHS/QoL was seen for cemiplimab plus chemotherapy compared with nonsignificant overall change from baseline for placebo plus chemotherapy (1.69, 95% CI, 0.20-3.19 vs. 1.08, 95% CI, -1.34 to 3.51; between arms, p = .673). No analyses yielded statistically significant PRO results favoring placebo plus chemotherapy for any QLQ-C30 or QLQ-LC13 scale.

CONCLUSION

Cemiplimab plus chemotherapy resulted in significant overall improvement in pain symptoms and delayed TTD in cancer-related and lung cancer-specific symptoms and functions.

Combined chemo-immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: feasible in the elderly?

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as the most common subtype. In the past decades, immunotherapy deeply changed paradigms for care of newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients without oncogenic driver mutations. An immunotherapy-based regimen alone or in combination to chemotherapy was crown as the preferred option to choice, according to worldwide guideline.

AREAS COVERED

Newly diagnoses of advanced NCSLC occurred predominantly in elderly patients, representing over half of patients treated in daily practice. However, data on older patients' treatments are still lacking, because they are under-represented in clinical trials. This leads to a "black hole" of knowledge about efficacy and safety of immune-checkpoint inhibitors use in this cohort of population.

EXPERT OPINION

According to available data from subgroup analyses, immunotherapy as single agent seem to work in elderly similarly to younger patients, with no excess of toxicities. In contrast, the real impact - and not least the safety - of an immune-chemo combination use in elderly population was still unclear. Awaiting data from dedicated clinical trials, this review will discuss available results from randomized phase III clinical trials comparing immune-chemo combinations to chemotherapy alone, focusing on elderly subgroup enrolled.

A nomogram for the prediction of the survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is frequently accompanied by interstitial lung disease (ILD), and the overall survival (OS) of patients with these comorbidities is poor. Thus, we developed a nomogram for the prediction of the OS of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ILD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with wild-type gene advanced NSCLC with and without ILD who underwent chemotherapy between 2014 and 2019 were enrolled in the present study. The 0.5- and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times of patients with and without ILD were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used to assess the prognostic value of clinical factors for patients with ILD. Based on the multivariate regression results, a nomogram for survival prediction was developed. The nomogram was validated using calibration curve.

RESULTS

Data from 155 patients with lung cancer and ILD and 118 matched patients with lung cancer alone who were receiving first-line chemotherapy were analyzed. The first-line chemotherapy regimens were paclitaxel + carboplatin, pemetrexed + carboplatin, gemcitabine + carboplatin, and other. The median PFS and OS were significantly shorter in patients with than in those without ILD (3.0 vs. 7.0 months [p < 0.001] and 7.0 vs. 15.0 months (p < 0.001), respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that the lymphocyte count (hazard ratio [HR] 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-3.94; p = 0.01), partial pressure of oxygen (PaO₂ ; HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.03-1.82; p = 0.03), and chemotherapy regimen were independently associated with prognosis. The nomogram showed good discriminatory ability [C-index = 0.69 (95% CI, 0.49-0.82)]. Calibration curves showed that predicted and actual prognoses were consistent.

CONCLUSION

This nomogram can aid the prediction of the OS of patients with advanced NSCLC and ILD.

Exploratory analysis of immunochemotherapy compared to chemotherapy after EGFR-TKI in non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer have received immunochemotherapy as one of the treatment options after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined EGFR-mutant patients treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel (ABCP) therapy or platinum-based chemotherapy (Chemo) after EGFR-TKI therapy at five institutions in Japan.

RESULTS

A total of 57 patients with EGFR mutation were analyzed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the ABCP (n = 20) and Chemo (n = 37) were 5.6 and 20.9 months, 5.4 and 22.1 months, respectively (PFS, p = 0.39; OS, p = 0.61). In programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive patients, median PFS in the ABCP group was longer than in the Chemo group (6.9 vs. 4.7 months, p = 0.89). In PD-L1-negative patients, median PFS in the ABCP group was significantly shorter than in the Chemo group (4.6 vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.04). There was no difference in median PFS between the ABCP and Chemo groups in the subgroups of brain metastases, EGFR mutation status, or chemotherapy regimens, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The effect of ABCP therapy and chemotherapy was comparable in EGFR-mutant patients in a real-world setting. The indication for immunochemotherapy should be carefully considered, especially in PD-L1-negative patients.

Osimertinib treatment based on plasma T790M monitoring in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): EORTC Lung Cancer Group 1613 APPLE phase II randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The APPLE trial aimed to evaluate the feasibility of longitudinal plasma EGFR T790M monitoring for the best sequencing strategy of gefitinib and osimertinib.

METHODS

APPLE is a randomized, non-comparative, phase II study in patients with common EGFR-mutant, treatment-naïve NSCLC including 3-arms: Arm A (osimertinib upfront until RECIST progression, PD), Arm B (gefitinib until emergence of circulating tumor DNA EGFR T790M mutation by cobas EGFR Test v2 or RECIST PD) and Arm C (gefitinib until RECIST PD), and then switch to osimertinib in both arms. The primary endpoint is the progression-free survival rate "on osimertinib" at 18 months (PFSR-OSI-18) after randomization in Arm B (H₀: PFSR-OSI-18 of ≤40%). Secondary endpoints include response rate, overall survival (OS) and brain PFS (BPFS). We report the results of Arms B and C.

RESULTS

From November 2017 to February 2020, 52 and 51 patients were randomized into Arms B and C. Most patients were females (70%) and had EGFR Del19 (65%); one-third had baseline brain metastases. In Arm B, 17% of patients (8/47) switched to osimertinib based on the emergence of ct-DNA T790M mutation before RECIST PD, with a median time to molecular PD of 266 days. The study met its primary endpoint of PFSR-OSI-18 by 67.2% (84% CI: 56.4-75.9%) in Arm B vs. 53.5% (84% CI 42.3-63.5%) in Arm C, with a median PFS of 22.0 months vs. 20.2 months, respectively. The median OS was not reached in Arm B vs. 42.8 months in Arm C. Median BPFS in Arms B and C were 24.4 months and 21.4 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The serial monitoring of ct-DNA T790M-status in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC during treatment with first-generation EGFR inhibitors was feasible, and a molecular progression before RECIST PD led to an earlier switch to osimertinib in 17% of patients with satisfactory PFS and OS outcomes.

PCSK9 regulates the efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy in lung cancer

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) secreted by tumors was reported as a deleterious factor that led to the reduction of lymphocyte infiltration and the poorer efficacy of ICIs in vivo. This study aimed to explore whether PCSK9 expression in tumor tissue could predict the response of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and the synergistic antitumor effect of the combination of the PCSK9 inhibitor with the anti-CD137 agonist. One hundred fifteen advanced NSCLC patients who received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy were retrospectively studied with PCSK9 expression in baseline NSCLC tissues detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The mPFS of the PCSK9^lo group was significantly longer than that of the PCSK9^hi group [8.1 vs. 3.6 months, hazard ratio (HR): 3.450; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.166-5.496]. A higher objective response rate (ORR) and a higher disease control rate (DCR) were observed in the PCSK9^lo group than in the PCSK9^hi group (54.4% vs. 34.5%, 94.7% vs. 65.5%). Reduction and marginal distribution of CD8⁺ T cells were observed in PCSK9^hi NSCLC tissues. Tumor growth was retarded by the PCSK9 inhibitor and the anti-CD137 agonist alone in the Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) mice model and further retarded by the PCSK9 inhibitor in combination with the CD137 agonist with long-term survival of the host mice with noticeable increases of CD8⁺ and GzmB⁺ CD8⁺ T cells and reduction of Tregs. Together, these results suggested that high PCSK9 expression in baseline tumor tissue was a deleterious factor for the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients. The PCSK9 inhibitor in combination with the anti-CD137 agonist could not only enhance the recruitment of CD8⁺ and GzmB⁺ CD8⁺ T cells but also deplete Tregs, which may be a novel therapeutic strategy for future research and clinical practice.

Development of a Novel Predictive-Prognostic Scoring Index for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for the treatment of patients with driver mutation absent advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present study aimed to develop a reliable, reproducible, and practical scoring system to prognosticate and predict response to ICI response in patients with advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients who were diagnosed as having unresectable/advanced stage NSCLC and were treated with at least one cycle of ICIs at the Medical Oncology Departments of Dr. Burhan Nalbantoğlu State Hospital (Nicosia, Cyprus) and Near East University Hospital (Nicosia, Cyprus) were included in the study. The association between variables and OS was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Variables with a P-value less than 0.05 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model. A prognostic scoring system was developed.  Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The value of the Concordance index (C-index) and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the discriminative ability of scoring systems.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty consecutive patients with unresectable/metastatic NSCLC who received PD-1 inhibitors between March 2017 and November 2022 were included. In the multivariate Cox regression model, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) were significantly associated with OS. We generated a new score using CRP ³1.0 mg/dL, ECOG PS ³2, and LDH level >ULN. Relative weight was based on the HRs of multivariate analyses (CRP ³1.0 mg/dL 2 points, ECOG PS ³2 2.5 points, and LDH level >ULN 1.5 points). The cohort was divided into three risk groups based on the sum of factors present: 0-2.5 (good risk), 3.5-4.5 (intermediate risk), or 6 (poor risk). The median OS was 18.9, 7.4, and 2.9 months for good, intermediate, and poor risk categories, respectively (log-rank test, p<0.001). The Harrell C-index of CEL to predict OS and PFS was 0.73 and 0.69, respectively, indicating significant predictability. The AUC of the scoring index for predicting the responses was 0.765 (95% CI: 0.685-0.845).

CONCLUSION

The CEL score is a promising prognostic and predictive index consisting of serum CRP levels (C), ECOG PS (E), and serum LDH levels (L). This represents another step forward in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Case Report: Response to crizotinib treatment in a patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with LDLR-ROS1 fusion

C-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) fusion is a pathogenic driver gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, clinical guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) have recommended molecular pathologic tests for patients with NSCLC, including the detection of the ROS1 gene. Crizotinib is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ROS1, and mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET). In recent years, the efficacy of crizotinib in NSCLC patients with ROS1 fusion has been reported. Here, a 77-year-old woman was diagnosed with stage IVA lung adenocarcinoma harboring a novel low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)-ROS1 fusion variant. This novel LDLR-ROS1 fusion was identified by targeted DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel and then verified by RNA fusion panel based on amplicon sequencing. This patient benefited from subsequent crizotinib therapy and achieved progression-free survival of 15 months without significant toxic symptoms. Our case report recommended a promising targeted therapeutic option for patients with metastatic NSCLC with LDLR-ROS1 fusion and highlighted the importance of genetic testing for accurate treatment.

Association of heartbeat complexity with survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

Background

Previous studies have shown that the predictive value of traditional linear (time domain and frequency domain) heart rate variability (HRV) for the survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. Nonlinear methods, based on the concept of complexity, have been used to evaluate HRV, providing a new means to reveal the physiological and pathological changes in HRV. This study aimed to assess the association between heartbeat complexity and overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

This study included 78 patients with advanced NSCLC (mean age: 62.0 ± 9.3 years). A 5-min resting electrocardiogram of advanced NSCLC patients was collected to analyze the following HRV parameters: time domain indicators, i.e., standard deviation of the normal-normal intervals (SDNN) and root mean square of successive interval differences (RMSSD); frequency domain indicators, i.e., total power (TP), low frequency power (LF), high frequency power (HF), and the ratio of LF to HF (LF/HF); nonlinear HRV indicators characterizing heartbeat complexity, i.e., approximate entropy (ApEn), sample entropy (SampEn), and recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) indexes: mean diagonal line length (Lmean), maximal diagonal line length (Lmax), recurrence rate (REC), determinism (DET), and shannon entropy (ShanEn).

Results

Univariate analysis revealed that the linear frequency domain parameter HF and nonlinear RQA parameters Lmax, REC, and DET were significantly correlated with the survival of advanced NSCLC patients (all p < 0.05). After adjusting for confounders in the multivariate analysis, HF, REC, and DET were found to be independent prognostic factors for the survival of patients with advanced NSCLC (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion

There was an independent association between heartbeat complexity and survival in advanced NSCLC patients. The nonlinear analysis method based on RQA may provide valuable additional information for the prognostic stratification of patients with advanced NSCLC and may supplement the traditional time domain and frequency domain analysis methods.

TP53 Co-Mutation Status Association with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

TP53 co-mutations have shown association with poor prognosis in various solid tumors. For EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), conflicting results exist regarding its impact on survival. Clinical outcomes and genomic data were obtained retrospectively from the real-world (rw) de-identified clinicogenomic database. Patients who initiated therapy for EGFR-mutated aNSCLC between January 2014 and December 2020 were identified. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by TP53-mutational status. In 356 eligible EGFR-mutated aNSCLC patients (median age 68 years), 210 (59.0%) had TP53 co-mutation and 146 (41.0%) had TP53 wild-type tumor. Unadjusted analysis showed significantly shorter survival in patients with TP53 co-mutation versus TP53 wild-type (rw progression-free survival [rwPFS]: HR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.9, p = 0.0196; overall survival [OS]: HR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.2, p = 0.0088). Multivariable analysis confirmed independent association between TP53 co-mutation and worse rwPFS (HR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-0.9, p = 0.0280) and OS (HR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-2.0, p = 0.0345). Directionally consistent findings were observed for response rates, and subgroups by EGFR-activating mutation and first-line (1 L) therapy, with more pronounced negative effect in 1 L EGFR-TKI subgroup. TP53 co-mutations negatively affected survival in patients with EGFR-mutated aNSCLC receiving standard 1 L therapy in real-world practice.

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world retrospective cohort study

Background

The aim of this study was to assessment the efficacy and safety of Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/Programmed cell death-Ligand protein 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

In this study, pre-treatment clinical and laboratory indicators from 73 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were retrieved for retrospective analysis. According to the therapy regimes they received, the patients were separated into groups, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy group (PC group), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents' group (PA group), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents plus chemotherapy group (PAC group). Cox's proportional hazards regression model and Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to assess the connection between treatment regimens and progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, the association of treatment regimens with the risk of disease progression and death was evaluated by subgroup analysis.

Results

The average age of the enrolled patients was 58.2 ± 10.2 years and 75.3% were male. Multivariate analyses showed that patients in PA group (Disease progression: HR 0.4, P=0.005. Death: HR 0.4, P=0.024) and PAC group (Disease progression: HR 0.3, P=0.012. Death: HR 0.3, P=0.045) had a statistically significant lower hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression and death compared to patients in PC group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in PA group (mPFS:7.5 vs.3.5, P=0.00052. mOS:33.1 vs.21.8, P=0.093) and PAC group (mPFS:5.1 vs.3.5, P=0.075. mOS:37.3 vs.21.8, P=0.14) had a longer PFS and OS compared to patients in PC group. In all the pre-defined subgroups, patients in PA and PAC groups showed a decreasing trend in the risk of disease progression and death in most subgroups. The patients in PA group (DCR:96.3% vs.58.3%, P=0.001) and PAC group (DCR:100% vs.58.3%, P=0.019) had a better disease control rate (DCR) than patients in PC group.

Conclusion

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy were superior to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as second or later-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

The efficacy and safety of Apatinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective trial

Background

As a potent inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway, Apatinib has been used in antitumor treatment for some time. The study aimed to research the therapeutic effects and toxicity of Apatinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 128 NSCLC patients treated with Apatinib in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria was adopted to evaluate the treatment effect, and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was conducted to determine the Adverse Events (AEs). Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier function were applied to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Among 128 NSCLC patients, partial response (PR) were observed in 15 patients, stable disease (SD) in 66 patients and progressive disease (PD) in 47 patients. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) accounted for 11.7% and 63.3% respectively. The median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) were 4.4 months and 17.2 months. Common side effects of Apatinib were hypertension (n=48), proteinuria (n=35), and hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (n=30), all of the side effects were controllable. No significant difference was observed in efficacy and AEs between the higher dose group (Apatinib>500mg/d) and the lower dose group (Apatinib=500mg/d).

Conclusions

The study suggested that Apatinib with a lower dose (=500mg/d) has good efficacy and safety in the treatment of advanced NSCLC after first-line chemotherapy.

Cancer cachexia as a determinant of efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Pembrolizumab, either as a type of monotherapy or in combination with cytotoxic anticancer agents, is effective in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the development of cancer cachexia may adversely affect anticancer drug therapy. The present study investigated the effect of cancer cachexia on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line pembrolizumab. The data of patients with advanced NSCLC receiving first-line monotherapy or combination therapy with pembrolizumab were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Clinical outcome was compared between patients with and without cancer cachexia. A total of 53 patients were analyzed. Among all patients, median TTF and OS were significantly shorter in patients with cancer cachexia than in those without [TTF: 5.8 vs. 10 months; hazard ratio (HR): 2.13; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-4.24; P=0.016; OS: 12.1 months vs. not reached; HR: 5.85; 95% CI: 2.0-17.1; P=0.001]. In addition, TTF in the pembrolizumab monotherapy group was significantly shorter in patients with cancer cachexia than in those without, but no significant difference was detected in patients receiving pembrolizumab combination therapy. The incidence of AEs did not significantly differ between patients with and without cancer cachexia, except with regard to hypothyroidism. In conclusion, although cancer cachexia is prognostic of a poor outcome in patients with advanced NSCLC who receive first-line pembrolizumab, cancer cachexia might not affect therapeutic efficacy in combination therapy with pembrolizumab and cytotoxic anticancer agents.

Establishment of prognostic nomograms for predicting the progression free survival of EGFR-sensitizing mutation, advanced lung cancer patients treated with EGFR-TKIs

Background

There is a lack of clinically available predictive models for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive, advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Methods

The clinical data of patients at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between from January 2016 to January 2021 were retrospectively retrieved as training set. The patients from BENEFIT trial were for the validation cohort. The nomogram was built based on independent predictors identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were evaluated by C‐index and calibration plots.

Results

A total of 502 patients with complete clinical data and follow‐up information were enrolled in this study. Five independent prognostic factors, including The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scale (ECOG PS), EGFR mutation subtype, EGFR co‐mutation, liver metastasis and malignant pleural effusion (p < 0.05). The C‐indexes of the nomogram were 0.694 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.663–0.725) for the training set and 0.653 (95% CI, 0.610–0.696) for the validation set. The calibration curves for the probabilities of 9‐, 12‐ and 18‐month progression‐free survival (PFS) revealed satisfactory consistency in both the internal and external validations. Additionally, the patients were divided into two groups according to risk (high‐risk, low‐risk), and significant differences in PFS were observed between the groups in the training and external validation cohorts (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

We constructed and validated a convenient nomogram that have the potential to become an accurate and reliable tool for patients with EGFR mutation positive, advanced NSCLC to individually predict their potential benefits from EGFR‐TKIs, and facilitate clinical decision‐making.

Pretreatment HDL-C and ApoA1 are predictive biomarkers of progression-free survival in patients with EGFR mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with TKI

BACKGROUND

We aimed to explore the correlation between blood lipids (high density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C] and apolipoprotein A1 [ApoA1]) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation, as well as its predictive role in clinical efficacy and progression-free survial (PFS) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI).

METHODS

We retrospectively collected information of 153 patients with advanced NSCLC harboring exon EGFR mutation and receiving EGFR-TKI.

RESULTS

The best cutoff value for HDL-C and ApoA1 was determined to be 1.15 and 1.14 mmol/l. The overall response rate (ORR) was 67.7% in the high HDL-C group and 46.6% in the low HDL-C group, respectively. The ORR of the high ApoA1 group showed a significant increase than that of the low ApoA1 group (68.1% vs. 38.5%). The mean ApoA1 level of the EGFR T790M mutation-positive group was significantly higher than that of the EGFR T790M mutation-negative group (1.13 g/l vs. 1.01 g/l). Patients with high ApoA1 levels were related to the EGFR T790M mutation (r = 0.324). (3) The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the high HDL-C group and low HDL-C group were 13.00 months and 10.20 months. The median PFS of the high ApoA1 group and the low ApoA1 group were 12.10 and 10.00 months, respectively. Multivariate Cox stepwise regression model analysis demonstrated ECOG PS, pathological type and HDL-C were confirmed as critical and independent predictors of PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with EGFR T790M mutations often show higher ApoA1 levels. Peripheral serum HDL-C and ApoA1 before treatment can be used as potential significant factors for predicting clinical efficacy and PFS in advanced NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKI.

Cost-Effectiveness of Cemiplimab Versus Standard of Care in the United States for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression ≥50

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, from a US commercial payer perspective, of cemiplimab versus other first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with programmed death-ligand 1 expression ≥50%.

METHODS

A 30-year "partitioned survival" model was constructed. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated by applying time-varying hazard ratios from a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated from EMPOWER-Lung 1 (cemiplimab monotherapy vs chemotherapy) and KEYNOTE-024 and KEYNOTE-042 (pembrolizumab monotherapy vs chemotherapy). Drug acquisition costs were based on published 2020 US list prices. A 3% discount rate was applied to life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and costs. A deterministic analysis was performed on the base case; 1-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assessed model and parameter uncertainties.

RESULTS

Cemiplimab was associated with increased time in the "preprogression" (13.08 vs 7.90 and 6.08 months) and "postprogression" (47.30 vs 29.49 and 14.78 months) health states versus pembrolizumab and chemotherapy, respectively. Compared with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy, cemiplimab generated 1.00 (95% CI -0.266 to 2.440) and 1.78 (95% CI 0.607-3.20) incremental QALYs, respectively, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $68 254 and $89 219 per QALY for cemiplimab versus pembrolizumab and cemiplimab versus chemotherapy, respectively. The probability of cemiplimab being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 to $150 000 per QALY was 62% to 76% versus pembrolizumab and 56% to 84% versus chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that cemiplimab, versus pembrolizumab or versus chemotherapy, is a cost-effective first-line treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with programmed death-ligand 1 expression ≥50%.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of CT perfusion parameters in patients with advanced NSCLC after chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the short-term prognostic value of Computed Tomography (CT) perfusion parameters in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after chemotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients with NSCLC who received concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy were enrolled. Before therapy, CT perfusion imaging was conducted to scan their local lesions. Then, the CT perfusion-associated parameters were recorded, and evaluated. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), 42 out of 60 patients had remission after chemotherapy. The blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), and permeability surface (PS) of the two groups were analyzed before therapy, and factors and parameters affecting the efficacy of concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy were discussed.

RESULTS

After chemotherapy, patients with remission showed lower BF, BV, and PS levels in pulmonary lesions than those without remission (all P<0.05). According to the 1-year follow-up results, 33 cases survived, and 27 cases died, and the survivors showed lower BF and PS levels than the dead (both P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with lower BF and PS in CT perfusion parameters obtained better chemotherapy efficacy, so BF and PS can be adopted to predict the survival of patients.

Circulating cytokines associated with clinical outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients who received chemoimmunotherapy

Background

Pretreatment and on‐treatment plasma cytokine levels in predicting clinical benefit in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with anti‐programmed death‐1 (PD‐1)‐based chemotherapy is still a matter of debate.

Methods

We measured 12 kind of plasma cytokines in patients with stage III/IV NSCLC before and during treatment with anti‐PD‐1 based chemotherapy. Associations with best overall response, and survival including progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Chi‐square test and Kaplan–Meier plots with log‐rank test, respectively. Logistic regression and Cox regression were used to determine independent risk factors.

Results

Of a total of 60 patients, high‐level of pretreatment interleukin‐2 was associated with longer PFS (log rank p = 0.049), while high‐level of pretreatment interleukin‐8 was associated with shorter OS (log rank p = 0.006). Increased on‐treatment interleukin‐1β (IL‐1β) was associated with both better response (odds ratio [OR] 6.233, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 1.451–26.344, p = 0.013) and longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.305, 95% CI: 0.127–0.730, p = 0.008). On the contrary, increased on‐treatment interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) was associated with a worse response (OR 0.015, 95% CI: 0.001–0.400, p = 0.012), worse PFS (HR 2.639, 95% CI: 1.163–5.991, p = 0.020) and worse OS (HR 2.742, 95% CI: 1.063–7.074, p = 0.037). Increased interferon‐γ (IFN‐γ) was found to be associated with better PFS (HR 0.336, 95% CI: 0.153–0.745, p = 0.007).

Conclusions

In patients with advanced NSCLC who received chemoimmunotherapy, on‐treatment increased IL‐1β and IFN‐γ may serve as positive indicator of efficacy, while on‐treatment increased IL‐6 might play a predictive role of worse clinical outcome.

An elderly advanced non-small cell lung cancer patient harboring rare epidermal growth factor receptor mutations L861R benefited from afatinib: A case report

RATIONALE

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significant efficacy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. No clear evidence exists that EGFR-L861R is sensitive to TKIs, and the best treatment for NSCLC patients with EGFR-L861R mutation is undetermined.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report the characteristics, efficacy, and adverse events of a patient harboring rare EGFR mutations L861R treated with afatinib, and summarize the currently available evidence and ongoing clinical trials regarding it.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient was diagnosed with advanced lung cancer that had progressed after previous osimertinib drug therapy, based on the clinical course and imaging findings.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent genetic testing, and next-generation sequencing detected rare EGFR mutations L861R in the plasma (mutation abundance 8.1%). The patient was then administered afatinib at 30 mg quaque die combined with bevacizumab at 300 mg every 2 weeks.

OUTCOMES

After 1 month of treatment, the patient achieved a quick response, and symptoms improved significantly. Repeat evaluation imaging demonstrated that the lesions in the lung and brain were significantly smaller and evaluation showed partial remission. However, despite showing an initial response, the patient presented with behavioral abnormalities, headaches, and sudden confusion after 2 months, and subsequently appeared coma. The family elected to forgo further therapy due to the patient's age and enrolled in hospice care, passing 14 months after the initial diagnosis.

LESSON

EGFR-L861R mutation could help predict the sensitivity of patients with advanced NSCLC to TKIs.

Long-Term Survival After Salvage Thoracic Surgery on a Patient with ALK-Rearranged Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma After Progression on Targeted Therapy

Targeted therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is often challenged by the arising of drug resistance. After progression to targeted therapy, treatment options include continued targeted therapy, definitive local therapy, and the combination of both. While there is evidence that local ablative radiotherapy may prolong the disease control by targeted therapy, little is known regarding the relevance of salvage thoracic surgery in this setting. Herein, we presented a case of stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with concurrent EML4-ALK and TAC1-ALK fusion who had long-term survival after salvage thoracic surgery. The patient underwent a multidisciplinary treatment scheme that consisted of radiotherapy, ALK inhibitor crizotinib, and surgery, with blood-based genomic profiling for monitoring disease progression. Notably, salvage thoracic surgery was performed after progression on the crizotinib therapy and acquired ALK F1174C mutation was identified, which has been shown to be resistant to crizotinib and possibly sensitive to ceritinib. The patient benefited from salvage thoracic surgery with a remarkable progression-free survival of 31 months at last follow-up, and the patient maintained high-performance status throughout the course of management. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reporting on the long-term survival outcome from salvage thoracic surgery after crizotinib treatment in an NSCLC patient carrying double ALK fusion.

Exosomal miR-136-5p Derived from Anlotinib-Resistant NSCLC Cells Confers Anlotinib Resistance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Through Targeting PPP2R2A

Background

Anlotinib resistance is a challenge for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Understanding the underlying mechanisms against anlotinib resistance is of great importance to improve prognosis and treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

RT-qPCR assay was used to assess the level of miR-136-5p in anlotinib-resistant NSCLC cells and exosomes derived from anlotinib-resistant NSCLC cells. In addition, miR-136-5p level in tumor tissues from patients who exhibited a poor response to anlotinib therapy and patients who were therapy naïve or patients who exhibited a positive response to anlotinib therapy was detected by RT-qPCR assay.

Results

In this study, we found that high levels of plasma exosomal miR-136-5p is correlated with clinically poor anlotinib response. In addition, anlotinib-resistant NSCLC cells promoted parental NSCLC cell proliferation via transferring functional miR-136-5p from anlotinib-resistant NSCLC cells to parental NSCLC cells via exosomes. Moreover, exosomal miR-136-5p could endow NSCLC cells with anlotinib resistance by targeting PPP2R2A, leading to the activation of Akt pathway. Furthermore, miR-136-5p antagomir packaging into anlotinib-resistant NSCLC cell-derived exosomes functionally restored NSCLC cell anlotinib sensitivity in vitro. Animal studies showed that A549/anlotinib cell-derived exosomal miR-136-5p agomir promoted A549 cell anlotinib resistance in vivo.

Conclusion

Collectively, these findings indicated that anlotinib-resistant NSCLC cell-derived exosomal miR-136-5p confers anlotinib resistance in NSCLC cells by targeting PPP2R2A, indicating miR-136-5p may act as a potential biomarker for anlotinib response in NSCLC.

Anlotinib, a novel TKI, as a third-line or further-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China: A systemic review and meta-analysis of its efficacy and safety

PURPOSE

In this meta-analysis and systemic review, we focused on the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).

METHODS

The databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and CBM were searched by 2 investigators up to April 2020. Titles and abstracts of all records were screened and eligible publications were retrieved in full. Review Manager (version 5.2, Cochrane Library) was used for data analysis. The outcomes of interest were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). Data was pooled for quantitative analysis and the effect size was reported as hazard ratio for survival outcomes and odds ratio (OR) for safety outcomes, both with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A sum of 1480 patients were included in 11 trials ranging from 2018 to 2020. Substantial improvements of PFS, OS, and DCR were observed in patients treated with anlotinib alone or in combination with other conventional treatment. Accompanied TRAE included statistically significant higher risk for hypertension (OR = 11.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.85-15.55, P < .001), hepatic dysfunction (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.29-2.68, P < .001), diarrhea (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.17-4.16, P < .05), and hemoptysis (OR = 2.59, 95% CI = 1.71-3.93, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that anlotinib as maintenance therapy for advanced NSCLC patients is associated with prolonged PFS and OS as well as DCR improvement, but it was accompanied by increased risk of TRAE, such as hypertension, hepatic dysfunction, diarrhea and hemoptysis. Although much effort has been made to clinical trials of anlotinib, further studies are warranted to provide more convincing evidence.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study

Background

Anlotinib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) independently developed by China, which can inhibit tumor angiogenesis and tumor cell proliferation. The ALTER 0303 study has suggested that anlotinib improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in the real world, the efficacy and safety of anlotinib is not clear. Although relevant retrospective studies have confirmed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib, the sample size is small. And the OS was not observed because of the follow-up time was short. Further studies are still essential to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC in real-world settings. Related studies have preliminarily shown that anlotinib combined with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) can significantly prolong the survival of patients with brain metastases of NSCLC. This study also discusses the best treatment strategies of patients with brain metastases.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 206 patients with advanced NSCLC who had treated with anlotinib. The primary endpoints were PFS and OS. The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were applied to evaluate the efficacy. Univariate analysis was performed by Log rank testing. Cox regression analysis was utilized to evaluate the significance of potential risk factors obtained from the univariate analysis.

Results

The median PFS (mPFS) was 4.0 (95% CI: 3.607-4.393) months, univariate analysis revealed that patients with longer PFS included epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-negative, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≤1, no brain metastases, no liver metastases, no adrenal metastases, or ≤2 distant metastases. Cox regression analysis indicated that patients with EGFR-negative and ECOG PS ≤1 had longer PFS. The median OS (mOS) was 8(95% CI: 6.495-9.505) months. EGFR mutation-negative, previous thoracic radiation therapy, no brain metastases, or ≤2 distant metastases were independent positive predictors of OS. The results of Cox regression indicated that the patients without previous thoracic radiation therapy (hazard ratio: 1.855; 95% CI: 1.162-2.960; p=0.010) had shortened OS. The objective response rate was 10.2%, and the disease control rate was 78.2%. The main treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were generally tolerated. All AEs observed during the trial were controlled after dose reduction or symptomatic treatments, and no death was found to be associated with anlotinib.

Conclusion

Anlotinib was well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients with EGFR mutation-negative and ECOG PS ≤1 had longer PFS, and patients without previous thoracic radiation therapy (HR: 1.855, 95% CI 1.162-2.960; P = 0.010) had shorter OS. Further investigations are needed because of small sample.

The Efficacy of Ginsenoside Rg3 Combined with First-line Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Background: For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, first-line chemotherapy is the main treatment in the clinic despite its efficacy is limited and adverse effects are always inescapable. Ginsenoside Rg3, an anti-cancer active ingredient by suppressing angiogenesis, has been increasingly widely used as an adjuvant in first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC to optimize treatment in China. However, no comprehensive meta-analyses have been conducted to estimate the efficacy and safety of the therapy combining ginsenoside Rg3 and first-line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients. Methods: Randomized controlled trails using a combination of first-line chemotherapy and ginsenoside Rg3 for advanced NSCLC patients were searched and selected from six databases. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assessed the quality of these selected original researches. And we used Review Manager 5.3 and STATA to analyze the data. Results: Twenty-two RCTs that matched our selection criteria with a number of 2202 patients were included in our review. The results showed that compared with first-line chemotherapy alone, the combination of ginsenoside Rg3 and first-line chemotherapy could better improve the objective response rate (ORR) (RR [95% CI], 1.44 [1.27, 1.63], p < 0.00001 ), the disease control rate (DCR) (RR [95% CI], 1.24 [1.12, 1.38], p < 0.0001), karnofsky performance status (KPS) (RR [95% CI], 1.62 [1.42, 1.84], p < 0.00001), one-year survival rate (RR [95% CI], 1.49 [1.08, 2.06], p = 0.01), two-year survival rate (RR [95% CI], 6.22 [1.68, 22.95], p = 0.006), weight change (RR [95% CI], 1.31 [1.04, 1.66], p = 0.02), and higher reduce the VEGF levels (RR [95% CI], -2.21 [-4.03, -0.38], p = 0.02), the incidence of gastrointestinal reactions (RR [95% CI], 0.66 [0.47, 0.93], p = 0.02) and bone marrow suppression (RR [95% CI], 0.43 [0.30, 0.61], p < 0.00001). Conclusion: Ginsenoside Rg3 can enhance drug efficacy and reduce drug-induced toxicity from chemotherapy. These findings provide helpful information for clinicians indicating that a therapy combined of ginsenoside Rg3 and first-line chemotherapy may be used to optimal the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

nab-Paclitaxel/Carboplatin in Vulnerable Populations With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Pooled Analysis

Introduction

Despite improvements in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), certain patient populations remain underrepresented in clinical trials. Many patients have benefited from platinum doublets, including nab-paclitaxel-based regimens, but there are patients with comorbidities who particularly require careful balancing of efficacy and safety. Clinical trial data are limited for patients who are elderly or have renal impairment, diabetes, or impaired performance status.

Methods

To better understand outcomes in these patient populations, we performed a pooled analysis using data from the ABOUND clinical trial program (ABOUND.SQM, ABOUND.PS2, ABOUND.70+) and the key phase III trial of nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin in advanced NSCLC. The populations included in this pooled analysis consisted of elderly patients (≥ 70 years) and patients with renal impairment (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m²), diabetes, or poor performance status (ECOG PS 2).

Results

Median progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 4.1 months in patients with ECOG PS 2 (95% CI, 2.04-5.09 months) to 7.7 months in patients with diabetes (95% CI, 5.88-10.12 months). PFS for elderly patients and patients with renal impairment was 6.9 months each (95% CI, 6.01-7.98 months and 4.47-9.79 months, respectively). Median overall survival (OS) was 18.2 months (95% CI, 10.94-28.22 months), 17.4 months (95% CI, 14.59-20.14 months), and 16.1 months (95% CI, 14.09-18.50 months) in patients with renal impairment, patients with diabetes, and elderly patients, respectively. Patients with ECOG PS 2 exhibited the shortest median OS: 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.98-11.37 months). Overall response rates were 56.9%, 54.6%, 45.9%, and 29.4% in patients with diabetes, elderly patients, patients with renal impairment, and patients with ECOG PS 2, respectively. Most treatment-related adverse events were hematologic. The most common grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events in patients with renal impairment, elderly patients, patients with diabetes, and patients with poor performance status included neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia.

Conclusions

Although survival data in patients with ECOG PS 2 were notably inferior to the other cohorts, our findings are consistent with those previously reported in the population-specific studies of the ABOUND trials and lend additional support for the use of nab-paclitaxel-based regimens in historically understudied and vulnerable populations.

Prospective Evaluation of Single Nucleotide Variants by Two Different Technologies in Paraffin Samples of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Targeted therapies are a new paradigm in lung cancer management. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques have allowed for simultaneous testing of several genes in a rapid and efficient manner; however, there are other molecular diagnostic tools such as the nCounter® Vantage 3D single nucleotide variants (SNVs) solid tumour panel which also offer important benefits regarding sample input and time-to-response, making them very attractive for daily clinical use. This study aimed to test the performance of the Vantage panel in the routine workup of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and to validate and compare its outputs with the Oncomine Solid Tumor (OST) panel DNA kit, the standard technique in our institution. Two parallel multiplexed approaches were performed based on DNA NGS and direct digital detection of DNA with nCounter® technology to evaluate SNVs. A total of 42 advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients were prospectively included in the study. Overall, 95% of samples were successfully characterized by both technologies. The Vantage panel accounted for a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 82%. In terms of predictive values, the probability of truly presenting the SNV variant when it is detected by the nCounter panel was 82%, whereas the probability of not presenting the SNV variant when it is not detected by the platform was 95%. Finally, Cohen's Kappa coefficient was 0.76, indicating a substantial correlation grade between OST and Vantage panels. Our results make nCounter an analytically sensitive, practical and cost-effective tool.

Multidisciplinary and Comprehensive Chinese Medicine for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study of 855 Cases

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of multidisciplinary and comprehensive Chinese medicine (CM) treatments on progression-free survival (PFS) and median survival time (MST) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and identify factors that influence progression and prognosis.

METHODS

Clinical data of 855 patients with advanced NSCLC who received multidisciplinary and comprehensive CM treatments at Longhua Hospital from January 2009 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank sequential inspection. Multivariate analysis of significant variables from the univariate analysis was performed with Cox regression modeling. Key factors correlated to progression and prognosis were screened out, and a Cox proportional hazard model was established to calculate the prognostic index.

RESULTS

The PFS and MST of 855 advanced NSCLC patients were 9.0 and 26.0 months, respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 79.2%, 54%, 36.2%, and 17.1%, respectively. Gender, pathologic type, and clinical stage were independent prognostic risk factors; surgical history, radiotherapy, treatment course of Chinese patent medicine, intravenous drip of Chinese herbal preparation, duration of oral administration of Chinese herbal decoction (CHD), and intervention measures were independent prognostic protective factors. Gender was an independent risk factor for progression, while operation history and oral CHD administration duration were independent protective factors (all P<0.05). Women with stage IIIb-IIIc lung adenocarcinoma had the best outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients have lower progression risk and better prognoses than male patients, younger patients have higher progression risk but better long-term prognoses than the elderlys, and patients with lower performance status scores are at lower risk for progression and have better prognoses. Comprehensive CM treatments could significantly reduce progression risk, improve prognosis, and prolong survival time for patients with advanced NSCLC. This treatment mode offers additional advantages over supportive care alone.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic literature review

Background

Therapeutic strategies with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) counteract the immunosuppressive effects of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and ligand-1 (PD-L1). ICI treatment has emerged in first- and second-line therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As immunotherapeutic treatment with ICIs is a dynamic field where new drugs and combinations are constantly evaluated, we conducted an up-to-date systematic review on comparative efficacy and safety in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

We searched PubMed up to February 2020 and Embase, CENTRAL, and clinical trial registries up to August 2018. Additionally, we checked reference lists. We dually screened titles, abstracts and, subsequently, full-texts for eligibility. Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias and graded the certainty of evidence following GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). For second-line therapy, we performed random-effects meta-analyses. Due to considerable clinical heterogeneity, we reported first-line results narratively.

Results

Of 1497 references, we identified 22 relevant publications of 16 studies. For first-line therapy, a combination of an ICI with chemotherapy improved progression-free survival and overall survival compared to chemotherapy but increased the risk of serious adverse events. Single-agent pembrolizumab increased overall and progression-free survival in patients with PD-L1 expression of ≥50% and resulted in less TRAE than chemotherapy. Compared to placebo, maintenance therapy with durvalumab increased overall and progression-free survival at the downside of higher risk of TRAE. For second-line therapy, a random-effects meta-analysis yielded a statistically significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for ICIs compared to docetaxel (HR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.63-0.75 for OS; HR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77 - 0.93 for PFS; 6 studies, 3478 patients; median OS benefit in months: 2.4 to 4.2). In meta-analysis, risk of any treatment-related adverse events of any grade was lower for ICI than docetaxel as second-line therapy (RR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.73-0.79; 6 studies, 3763 patients).

Conclusion

In first-line therapy of patients with advanced NSCLC, ICI is effective when combined with chemotherapy not depending on PD-L1 expression, or as monotherapy in high PD-L1 expressing tumors. For second-line therapy, single-agent ICI improves efficacy and safety compared to docetaxel.

Effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy on skin toxicity and skin-related quality of life in patients with lung cancer: An observational study

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy is the primary treatment option for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, one of the major adverse effects associated with this therapy is skin toxicity, which impacts the patient's quality of life. This study aimed to describe the severities and locations of skin toxicity, and to analyze their association with the quality of life in patients with advanced NSCLC who received EGFR-TKI therapy as first-line treatment.This cross-sectional and correlation study was conducted at a tertiary medical center in northern Taiwan between July 2015 and March 2016. Skin toxicity was assessed and graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03). The Skindex-16 scale was used to measure the skin disease-related quality of life.A total of 146 NSCLC patients who received EGFR-TKI therapy within the first 3 months of diagnosis were included in this study; 93.2% of these patients experienced skin toxicities. Approximately 70% of the patients developed xerosis and pruritus, while 50% had papulopustular eruptions and paronychia. The mean skin symptom impact score was 5.38 (standard deviation = 2.65). The skin-related quality of life varied widely among the participants but remained acceptable (mean score = 13.96, standard deviation = 16.55). Skin symptoms correlated significantly with poor quality of life (r = 0.50, P < .001). Younger patients and those treated with afatinib were the most affected, reporting the poorest quality of life. Patients who required EGFR-TKI dose reduction had experienced more severe skin symptoms than had patients who did not require it (7.35 vs 5.01, P < .001).Skin toxicity related to EGFR-TKI treatment impacts the quality of life in patients with NSCLC. During the treatment period, skin assessment and tailored management should be incorporated into the daily care plan.

A Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Chemotherapy Plus Anlotinib vs Chemotherapy Alone as Second- or Third-Line Salvage Treatment for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

Anlotinib is a newly developed oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor. We retrospectively evaluated the toxicity and clinical efficacy of chemotherapy combined with anlotinib versus chemotherapy alone for metastatic/advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients who failed first- or second-line systemic treatment in China.

Patients and Methods

In this retrospective trial, ninety-four advanced NSCLC patients received chemotherapy combined with anlotinib (n = 41) or chemotherapy alone (n = 53) in Henan Cancer Hospital. We recorded the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs).

Results

In the anlotinib plus chemotherapy group, eleven patients (27%) achieved a PR (partial response), and twenty-one patients (51%) achieved SD (stable disease), with an ORR of 27% and a DCR of 78%. In the chemotherapy alone group, eight patients (15%) achieved a PR, and nineteen patients (36%) had SD, with an ORR of 15% and a DCR of 51%. The ORR in the combination arm was slightly, but not obviously, higher than that in the chemotherapy arm (27% vs 15%, p > 0.05). In addition, the DCR was significantly higher in the combination arm than in the chemotherapy alone arm (78% vs 51%, p=0.007). At the end of follow-up, patients in the combination arm had a 1.5-month longer median PFS than patients in the chemotherapy arm; this difference was statistically significant (5.0 vs 3.5, p=0.002). The median OS was not achieved at the final analysis. The hematological and nonhematological toxicities were well tolerated and controlled. In general, most toxicity was limited to grade I or II, well tolerated and controlled.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that anlotinib combined with chemotherapy may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for advanced NSCLC in patients who fail first- or second-line therapy.

Usefulness of Two Independent DNA and RNA Tissue-Based Multiplex Assays for the Routine Care of Advanced NSCLC Patients

Personalized medicine is nowadays a paradigm in lung cancer management, offering important benefits to patients. This study aimed to test the feasibility and utility of embedding two multiplexed genomic platforms as the routine workup of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Two parallel multiplexed approaches were performed based on DNA sequencing and direct digital detection of RNA with nCounter® technology to evaluate gene mutations and fusions. The results were used to guide genotype-directed therapies and patient outcomes were collected. A total of 224 advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients were prospectively included in the study. Overall, 85% of samples were successfully characterized at DNA and RNA levels and oncogenic drivers were found in 68% of patients, with KRAS, EGFR, METΔex14, BRAF, and ALK being the most frequent (31%, 19%, 5%, 4%, and 4%, respectively). Among all patients with complete genotyping results and follow-up data (n = 156), the median overall survival (OS) was 1.90 years (confidence interval (CI) 95% 1.69-2.10) for individuals harbouring an actionable driver treated with a matched therapy, compared with 0.59 years (CI 95% 0.39-0.79) in those not eligible for any targeted therapy and 0.61 years (CI 95% 0.12-1.10) in patients with no drivers identified (p < 0.001). Integrating DNA and RNA multiplexing technologies into the routine molecular testing of advanced NSCLC patients is feasible and useful and highlights the necessity of widespread integrating comprehensive molecular diagnosis into lung cancer care.

Predictive significance of T cell subset changes during ex vivo generation of adoptive cellular therapy products for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Adoptive T cell immunotherapy with cytokine-induced killer cells (CIKs) has been demonstrated to prolong the survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the expansion of effector T cells and the decrease of regulatory T cells (Tregs) that occurred during the ex vivo generation of DC-CIKs were associated with improved clinical outcome in patients who received treatment. CIKs were generated ex vivo over a 28-day period from the peripheral blood apheresis product of 163 patients with advanced cancer (including 30 with NSCLC). CIKs were also generated from an additional cohort of 65 patients with NSCLC over a 15-day period. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) time of patients treated with CIKs was determined by reviewing the patients' medical records. The number of CIKs gradually increased during the culture period and peaked at day 15, followed by a slight decline until day 28. Similarly, the percentages of T cell subtypes associated with anti-tumor activity (CD3⁺, CD3⁺CD4⁺, CD3⁺CD8⁺ and CD8⁺CD28⁺) peaked at day 15. Although the percentage of CD4⁺CD25⁺CD127⁺ Tregs increased by day 7, a decrease was subsequently observed. Among the 95 patients with NSCLC, those with a post/pre-culture ratio of CD8⁺CD28⁺ T lymphocytes >2.2 had significantly better PFS and OS compared with those with ratios ≤2.2. Those with a post/pre-culture CD4⁺CD25⁺CD127⁺ Treg ratio ≤0.6 had significantly better OS and PFS compared with those with ratios >0.6. The peak expansion of CIKs from peripheral blood mononuclear cells occurred at day 15 of ex vivo culture. PFS and OS were associated with post/pre-culture CD8⁺CD28⁺ T lymphocyte ratio >2.2 and post/pre-culture CD4⁺CD25⁺CD127⁺ Treg ratio <0.6 in the CIKs of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with adoptive T cell immunotherapy. Further efforts are underway to optimize the DC-CIK infusion for cancer immunotherapy.

Analysis of key clinical features for achieving complete remission in stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Although development of immune checkpoint inhibitors and various molecular target agents has extended overall survival time (OS) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a complete cure remains rare. We aimed to identify features and treatment modalities of complete remission (CR) cases in stages III and IV NSCLC by analyzing long-term survivors whose OS exceeded 3 years.

METHODS

From our hospital database, 1,699 patients, registered as lung cancer between 1^st Mar 2004 and 30^th Apr 2011, were retrospectively examined. Stage III or IV histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC patients with chemotherapy initiated during this period were enrolled. A Cox proportion hazards regression model was used. Data collection was closed on 13^th Feb 2017.

RESULTS

There were 164 stage III and 279 stage IV patients, including 37 (22.6%) and 51 (18.3%) long-term survivors and 12 (7.3%) and 5 (1.8%) CR patients, respectively. The long-term survivors were divided into three groups: 3 ≤ OS < 5 years, 5 years ≤ OS with tumor, and 5 years ≤ OS without tumor (CR). The median OS of these groups were 1,405, 2,238, and 2,876 days in stage III and 1,368, 2,503, and 2,643 days in stage IV, respectively. The mean chemotherapy cycle numbers were 16, 20, and 10 in stage III and 24, 25, and 5 in stage IV, respectively. In the stage III CR group, all patients received chemoradiation, all oligometastases were controlled by radiation, and none had brain metastases. Compared with non-CR patients, the stage IV CR patients had smaller primary tumors and fewer metastases, which were independent prognostic factors for OS among long-term survivors. The 80% stage IV CR patients received radiation or surgery for controlling primary tumors, and the surgery rate for oligometastases was high. Pathological findings in the stage IV CR patients revealed that numerous inflammatory cells existed around and inside resected lung and brain tumors, indicating strong immune response.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple line chemotherapies with primary and oligometastatic controls by surgery and/or radiation might achieve cure in certain advanced NSCLC. Cure strategies must be changed according to stage III or IV. This study was retrospectively registered on 16^th Jun 2019 in UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (number UMIN000037078).

Effect of gefitinib on serum EGFR and CYFRA21-1 in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Changes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and cytokeratin fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) before and after gefitinib treatment were observed to explore the significance of such changes. A total of 175 patients with advanced NSCLC who were admitted to Hubei Cancer Hospital from July 2012 to October 2015 were collected and divided into two groups: the control group (85 patients who received conventional chemotherapy) and the experimental group (90 patients treated with gefitinib combined with chemotherapy). The serum expression levels of EGFR and CYFRA21-1 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The therapeutic efficacy and 3-year survival of the two groups were compared, and the factors affecting the survival of the patients were analyzed. The total effective rate and local effective rate of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Before treatment, no significant difference was detected in the levels of EGFR and CYFRA21-1 between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, the expression levels of EGFR and CYFRA21-1 in the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (P<0.05). According to the 3-year survival rate, the experimental group was divided into the survival group and the non-survival group. Single factor analysis was performed on the general data, showing that the influencing factors of the survival include the KPS score, smoking history, number of lesions, pathological stage, EGFR, and CYFRA21-1. Gefitinib can bring significantly improved therapeutic efficacy, lower expression levels of EGFR and CYFRA21-1, and longer survival time for patients with advanced NSCLC. Indicators including confirmed smoking history, a KPS score less than or equal to 60 points, multiple lesions, pathological stage IV, high expression of EGFR and CYFRA21-1, are important factors affecting the survival of patient with advanced NSCLC.

Referral Characteristics of Palliative Care Service in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Tertiary Cancer Center

BACKGROUND

The American Society of Clinical Oncology recently recommends patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should be offered palliative care services earlier. We sought to investigate the timing of palliative care referral of Chinese patients with NSCLC in our center.

METHOD

Retrospective medical data including demographic characteristics and referral information were collected for analysis. Overall survival (OS) was calculated as the time since cancer diagnosis till patient's death. The time interval from palliative care (PC) referral to a patient's death (PC-D) was calculated. The PC-D/OS ratio was calculated to illustrate the comparison of the duration of PC in the overall length of disease.

RESULTS

The mean age of 155 patients with advanced NSCLC was 62.83 years. Before referral to PC, 128 patients received anticancer treatment including surgeon (46.5%). Sixty-three (40.6%) patients died in palliative care unit. The median OS of 144 patients with end cutoff was 19 months (mean = 31.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 25.86-37.12). The median PC-D was 41 days (mean = 73.84, 95% CI = 60.37-87.40). The mean interval of PC-D/OS of 144 patients with definitely death time was 0.22 (SD: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.17-0.26). The median interval was 0.089. More than half of patients (n = 75, 51.8%) underwent PC less than 1% time (PC-D/OS < 0.1) of their whole disease course. Patients who were indigenous to Shanghai (P = .013) and who had brain metastasis (P = .072) had the potential longer PC-D/OS ratio. A high proportion of patients reported loss of appetite (92.8%) and fatigue (91.4%) at the initial of referral to PC.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study, in a population of patients with advanced NSCLC, gave detailed information about PC services in a tertiary cancer center.

Progression-free survival and one-year milestone survival as surrogates for overall survival in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The advent of immunotherapy leads to greater availability of effective subsequent treatments and extended survival in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), complicating the evaluation of overall survival (OS) in second-line NSCLC trials. Here, we aimed to assess the surrogacy of progression-free survival (PFS) and milestone survival for OS in second-line NSCLC trials investigating chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, respectively. We systemically searched for active-controlled, second-line NSCLC trials. The milestone time point was set at one-year based on pre-analysis. A two-stage meta-analytic validation model was adopted to assess associations between surrogate endpoint (SE) and OS and associations between treatment effects on SE and OS. Treatment effects on SE and OS were expressed as PFS hazard ratios (HR_PFS ), 1 yr-milestone ratio (Ratio_1y-SUR ) and HR_OS . Subgroup analyses stratified by treatment types and trial publication years evaluated the surrogacy in different clinical contexts. The study included 50 trials with 22,804 patients. One-year survival strongly correlated with OS (R² [95% confidence interval]: one-year survival -median OS = 0.707 [0.704-0.708]; Ratio_1y-SUR -HR_OS = 0.829 [0.828-0.831]). No correlation was established between PFS and OS (median PFS-median OS = 0.100 [0.098-0.101]; HR_PFS -HR_OS = 0.064 [0.059-0.069]), except in immunotherapy subgroup (HR_PFS -HR_OS = 0.835 [0.791-0.918]). In subgroup analyses, surrogacy of one-year survival persisted in different clinical contexts, and the disassociation between PFS and OS persisted in recent trials. One-year milestone survival showed strong surrogacy for OS in second-line NSCLC trials. Although no association was identified between PFS and OS, the strong HR_PFS -HR_OS correlation in immunotherapy trials indicates the potential of PFS as a SE in NSCLC trials involving immunotherapies.