Response to lorlatinib rechallenge in a case of ALK-rearranged metastatic NSCLC with a resistance mutation to second generation TKIs

INTRODUCTION

Several anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been developed for the treatment of echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with the newer generation agents brigatinib, alectinib and lorlatinib showing prolonged responses. With the increasing number of target therapies available, the optimal sequence is yet to be defined, as resistance profiles may evolve over time and in response to sequential ALK inhibitors. Therefore, ALK-targeted strategies may be personalized based upon the presence of specific ALK resistance mutations.

METHODS

Here, we report on the case of a patient who has been treated with a sequence of three ALK TKIs after receiving diagnosis of ALK-rearranged metastatic NSCLC in 2015 and gained further benefit upon lorlatinib rechallenge after the acquisition of the G1202R resistance mutation to second generation TKIs.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In this case, the first ALK resistance mutation detected after progression on first line TKI, the I1171N, is a common resistance mutation after alectinib and confers sensitivity to brigatinib, that the patient received afterwards with a long-term disease stability. The second ALK resistance mutation detected after a chemotherapy interval, the G1202R, is the most common resistance mutation after second generation ALK TKIs and has been associated with sensitivity to third generation TKIs, such as lorlatinib. This case of a patient with EML4-ALK-rearranged NSCLC shows that sequential treatment with next-generation ALK TKIs, including rechallenge, can induce profound remissions, even in heavily pretreated patients, and that ALK-targeted strategies may be personalized by considering the presence of distinct ALK resistance mutations.

Treatment sequencing after failure to alectinib in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

Alectinib is the first-line therapy for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Although some guidelines have recommended using other anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors after alectinib failure, evidence for such regimens in patients who fail to respond to alectinib is limited. This study involved using administrative claims data from acute care hospitals in Japan. We extracted the data of 634 patients diagnosed with lung cancer between September 1, 2014, and January 31, 2023, who received alectinib treatment before treatment with another anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor. We assessed distributions of patients according to their treatment sequencing and prognosis among three periods defined based on the initial marketing dates of lorlatinib and brigatinib. The type of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors after alectinib failure changed over time. In the most recent period, lorlatinib (58%) and brigatinib (40%) became predominant. Two-year overall survival improved over time (47%-84%), accompanied by an increased 2-year proportion of patients who continuously used anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors after alectinib failure (13%-44%). The times to treatment discontinuation of the regimen between patients treated with lorlatinib and brigatinib were similar, with a hazard ratio of 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.64) in the period after marketing brigatinib. This study provides insights into the evolving treatment landscape for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer who experience failed alectinib treatment and highlights the need for further studies and data accumulation to determine the optimal treatment strategy.

Cost-effectiveness of first-line versus second-line use of brigatinib followed by lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The ALTA-1 L trial and EXP-3B arm of NCT01970865 trial found that both brigatinib and lorlatinib showed durable and robust responses in treating ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, brigatinib and lorlatinib treatments are costly and need indefinite administration until the disease progression. Thus, it remains uncertain whether using brigatinib followed by lorlatinib before chemotherapy is cost-effective compared to reserving these two drugs until progression after chemotherapy.

Methods

We used a Markov model to assess clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of treating ALK-positive NSCLC individuals with brigatinib followed by lorlatinib before chemotherapy versus a strategy of reserving these drugs until progression after chemotherapy. Transition probabilities were estimated using parametric survival modeling based on multiple clinical trials. The drug acquisition costs, adverse events costs, administration costs were extracted from published studies before and publicly available data. We calculated lifetime direct healthcare costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from the perspective of a United States payer.

Results

Our base-case analysis indicated that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of using first-line brigatinib followed by lorlatinib compared with second-line brigatinib followed by lorlatinib is $-400,722.09/QALY which meant that second-line brigatinib followed by lorlatinib had less costs and better outcomes. Univariate sensitivity analysis indicated the results were most sensitive to the cost of brigatinib. Probability sensitivity analysis revealed that using brigatinib followed by lorlatinib before chemotherapy had a 0% probability of cost-effectiveness versus delaying these two drugs until progression after chemotherapy at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses conducted revealed the robustness of this result, as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios never exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold.

Conclusion

Using brigatinib as first-line treatment followed by lorlatinib for ALK-positive NSCLC may not be cost-effective given current pricing from the perspective of a United States payer. Delaying brigatinib followed by lorlatinib until subsequent lines of treatment may be a reasonable strategy that could limit healthcare costs without affecting clinical outcomes. More mature data are needed to better estimate cost-effectiveness in this setting.

Real world study of safety and efficacy of lorlatinib as second line and beyond in ALK-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in India - a multicentre chart review study (ROSELAND)

Background

Lorlatinib, an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-inhibitor, is approved as frontline as well as subsequent line of therapy in ALK-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There is limited literature about safety and efficacy of lorlatinib in Indian patients.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective multicentre study on patients with ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC received lorlatinib as second line and beyond between May 2017 and December 2021. ALK was tested either by immunohistochemistry or fluorescent in-situ hybridisation. Clinicopathologic features, treatment details, toxicity and outcomes were analysed.

Results

A total of 38 patients were enrolled with a median age of 54 years (range: 30-72) and male: female ratio of 20:18. Fifteen (44%) patients had brain metastases at baseline. Lorlatinib use was - second line in 11 (29%), third line in 21 (55%) and fourth line in 4 (11%) of patients, respectively. The best radiologic response to lorlatinib was - complete response in 9 (24%), partial response in 17 (46%), stable disease in 9 (24%) and progressive disease in 2 (5%) of patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 76.6 months (95% CI: 68.9-100), the median progression-free survival (PFS) of lorlatinib was not reached (95% CI: 24.3-not reached) and median overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort was 93.1 months (95% CI: 62-not reached). Both median PFS (p = 0.48) and median OS (p = 0.74) was similar between second line and later line use of lorlatinib. Thirty-three (87%) patients experienced treatment-related toxicity and six (16%) patients required dose modification.

Conclusion

Lorlatinib was highly efficacious in terms of overall response rate, median PFS and median OS in this small real-world cohort of advanced ALK+ve NSCLC with a manageable safety profile.

An Infant-Type Hemispheric Glioma With SOX5::ALK: A Novel Fusion

Infant-type hemispheric glioma (IHG) is a rare pediatric brain tumor with variable response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Molecular insights into IHG can be useful in identifying potentially active targeted therapy. A male fetus was found to have congenital hydrocephalus at the gestational age of 37 weeks. Fetal MRI showed a 2.6 × 2.0-cm tumor located at the frontal horn of the left lateral ventricle, involving the left basal nuclei and thalamus. Tumor biopsy at the age of 2 days revealed an IHG consisting of spindle tumor cells with strong expression of GFAP and ALK. Targeted RNA sequencing detected a novel fusion gene of SOX5::ALK. After initial chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, and etoposide for 2 cycles, the tumor size progressed markedly and the patient underwent a subtotal resection of brain tumor followed by treatment with lorlatinib, an ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor with central nervous system (CNS) activity. After 3 months of treatment, reduction of tumor size was observed. After 14 months of treatment, partial response was achieved, and the infant had normal growth and development. In conclusion, we identified a case of congenital IHG with a novel SOX5::ALK fusion that had progressed after chemotherapy and showed partial response and clinical benefit after treatment with the CNS-active ALK inhibitor lorlatinib.

Potential interactions between triazole antifungal agents and lorlatinib based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in rat plasma

AIM

Our study is to investigate the effects of triazole antifungal drugs on the pharmacokinetics of lorlatinib in rats.

METHODS

The samples were precipitated with methanol. Chromatographic separation was performed on a ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system using a BEH C18 column. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid water and methanol. Lorlatinib and crizotinib (internal standard) were detected in multiple reaction monitoring mode. The fragment ions were 407.3-228.07 for lorlatinib and m/z 450.3-260.0 for crizotinib. Lorlatinib and different triazole antifungal drugs were given to Sprague Dawley rats by gavage, and blood was collected from the tail vein at a certain time point. The validated UPLC-MS/MS method was applied to a drug interaction study of ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, and posaconazole with lorlatinib in rats.

RESULTS

Ketoconazole and voriconazole significantly inhibited lorlatinib metabolism. When administration with ketoconazole and voriconazole, the area under the curve from time zero to infinity of lorlatinib increased by 49.0% and 104.3%, respectively; the clearance decreased by 40.0% and 40.0%, respectively. While itraconazole and posaconazole did not affect lorlatinib pharmacokinetics.

CONCLUSION

The UPLC-MS/MS-based assay is helpful to further understand the pharmacokinetics of lorlatinib in rats, and confirmed the findings that the combination of lorlatinib with CYP3A inhibitors should be avoided as predicted by our pre-clinical studies.

A computational examination of the therapeutic advantages of fourth-generation ALK inhibitors TPX-0131 and repotrectinib over third-generation lorlatinib for NSCLC with ALK F1174C/L/V mutations

Background: In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a pivotal factor in promoting cancer development is the rearrangement in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase ALK gene, resulting in elevated ALK protein expression. F1174C/L/V is the acquired secondary resistant mutation in ALK. Significant survival improvements have been seen while tyrosine kinase inhibitors specifically target ALK. Nevertheless, the emergence of drug resistance hinders the clinical effectiveness of these drugs. Objective: This research sought to find the binding affinity/inhibitory effects of the existing drug lorlatinib (LOR) and upcoming TPX-0131 (zotizalkib/TPX) and repotrectinib (TPX-0005/REP) inhibitors against ALK F1174C/L/V mutations using computational approaches to identify potential strategies over resistance. Methods: We conducted molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and MMPBSA calculations to investigate how compact macrocyclic inhibitors, such as TPX-0131 and repotrectinib, fit within the ATP-binding boundary and differ from LOR. Results: Our results demonstrated that TPX-0131 and repotrectinib contributed to higher binding energy in F1174C and F1174L mutations than LOR. Repotrectinib showed greater binding energy in the F1174V mutation, whereas LOR and TPX-0131 exhibited similar binding energy. However, all three inhibitors showed significant binding energy toward F1174C/L/V mutations found in NSCLC. Conclusion: This comparative study of the potential binding effects of fourth-generation inhibitors TPX-0131 and repotrectinib and third-generation inhibitor LOR for ALK F1174C/L/V mutations revealed the atomistic insights of the binding mechanism. These computational findings enable us to carry out further research for the clinical implementation of fourth-generation ALK inhibitors on ALK-positive NSCLC.

ALK F1174S mutation impairs ALK kinase activity in EML4-ALK variant 1 and sensitizes EML4-ALK variant 3 to crizotinib

Objective

To assess the influence of F1174S mutation on kinase activity and drug sensitivity of the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion (EML4-ALK) variants 1 and 3.

Methods

We constructed mammalian expression plasmids of both wildtype and F1174 mutant EML4-ALK variants 1 and 3, and then characterized them with cell models by performing immunoblotting, neurite outgrowth assay, focus formation assay as well as protein stability assay. Drug sensitivity to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors was also compared between wildtype and F1174 mutant EML4-ALK fusions. In addition, we characterized the effect of different F1174 kinase domain mutations in the context of EML4-ALK fusions.

Results

In contrast to the oncogenic ALK-F1174S mutation that has been reported to be activating in the context of full-length ALK in neuroblastoma, EML4-ALK (F1174S) variant 1 exhibits impaired kinase activity leading to loss of oncogenicity. Furthermore, unlike the previously reported F1174C/L/V mutations, mutation of F1174 to S sensitizes EML4-ALK variants 3a and 3b to crizotinib.

Conclusion

These findings highlight the complexity of drug selection when treating patients harboring resistance mutations and suggest that the F1174S mutation in EML4-ALK variant 1 is likely not a potent oncogenic driver. Additional oncogenic driver or other resistance mechanisms should be considered in the case of EML4-ALK variant 1 with F1174S mutation.

ALK signaling primes the DNA damage response sensitizing ALK-driven neuroblastoma to therapeutic ATR inhibition

High-risk neuroblastoma (NB) is a significant clinical challenge. MYCN and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK), which are often involved in high-risk NB, lead to increased replication stress in cancer cells, suggesting therapeutic strategies. We previously identified an ATR (ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related)/ALK inhibitor (ATRi/ALKi) combination as such a strategy in two independent genetically modified mouse NB models. Here, we identify an underlying molecular mechanism, in which ALK signaling leads to phosphorylation of ATR and CHK1, supporting an effective DNA damage response. The importance of ALK inhibition is supported by mouse data, in which ATRi monotreatment resulted in a robust initial response, but subsequent relapse, in contrast to a 14-d ALKi/ATRi combination treatment that resulted in a robust and sustained response. Finally, we show that the remarkable response to the 14-d combined ATR/ALK inhibition protocol reflects a robust differentiation response, reprogramming tumor cells to a neuronal/Schwann cell lineage identity. Our results identify an ability of ATR inhibition to promote NB differentiation and underscore the importance of further exploring combined ALK/ATR inhibition in NB, particularly in high-risk patient groups with oncogene-induced replication stress.

Toxic Erythema of Chemotherapy, Vasculitic Eruption With Malignant Intertrigo Characteristics, and Superimposed Infection Post-bevacizumab Initiation

Drug reactions are a known risk in combined anti-cancer therapy. Less commonly recognized risks of chemotherapies and targeted immunotherapies include toxic erythema of chemotherapy reactions. With the immunosuppressive quality of cancer combined with anti-cancer treatments, patients are also susceptible to increased infection. We report a rare case of combined targeted anti-cancer treatment with bevacizumab and lorlatinib, and an associated transformation of an eczematous process into a toxic erythema of chemotherapy vasculitic eruption, with combined malignant intertrigo characteristics and superimposed infection following the initiation of bevacizumab.

From Development to Place in Therapy of Lorlatinib for the Treatment of ALK and ROS1 Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Following the results of the CROWN phase III trial, the third-generation macrocyclic ALK inhibitor lorlatinib has been introduced as a salvage option after the failure of a first-line TKI in ALK-rearranged NSCLC, while its precise role in the therapeutic algorithm of ROS1 positive disease is still to be completely defined. The ability to overcome acquired resistance to prior generation TKIs (alectinib, brigatinib, ceritinib, and crizotinib) and the high intracranial activity in brain metastatic disease thanks to increased blood-brain barrier penetration are the reasons for the growing popularity and interest in this molecule. Nevertheless, the major vulnerability of this drug resides in a peculiar profile of related collateral events, with neurological impairment being the most conflicting and debated clinical issue. The cognitive safety concern, the susceptibility to heterogeneous resistance pathways, and the absence of a valid alternative in the second line are strongly jeopardizing a potential paradigm shift in this oncogene-addicted disease. So, when prescribing lorlatinib, clinicians must face two diametrically opposed characteristics: a great therapeutic potential without the intrinsic limitations of its precursor TKIs, a cytotoxic activity threatened by suboptimal tolerability, and the unavoidable onset of resistance mechanisms we cannot properly manage yet. In this paper, we give a critical point of view on the stepwise introduction of this promising drug into clinical practice, starting from its innovative molecular and biochemical properties to intriguing future developments, without forgetting its weaknesses.

ALK inhibitors increase ALK expression and sensitize neuroblastoma cells to ALK.CAR-T cells

Selection of the best tumor antigen is critical for the therapeutic success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) receptor is expressed by most neuroblastomas while virtually absent in most normal tissues. ALK is an oncogenic driver in neuroblastoma and ALK inhibitors show promising clinical activity. Here, we describe the development of ALK.CAR-T cells that show potent efficacy in monotherapy against neuroblastoma with high ALK expression without toxicity. For neuroblastoma with low ALK expression, combination with ALK inhibitors specifically potentiates ALK.CAR-T cells but not GD2.CAR-T cells. Mechanistically, ALK inhibitors impair tumor growth and upregulate the expression of ALK, thereby facilitating the activity of ALK.CAR-T cells against neuroblastoma. Thus, while neither ALK inhibitors nor ALK.CAR-T cells will likely be sufficient as monotherapy in neuroblastoma with low ALK density, their combination specifically enhances therapeutic efficacy.

Enteral lorlatinib after immune hyperprogression as a treatment option for anaplastic lymphoma kinase‑positive non‑small cell lung cancer: A case report

Fusion of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene is a rare driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lorlatinib is a third-generation ALK inhibitor approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic ALK+ NSCLC. The traditional administration method of lorlatinib is whole tablet ingestion, while the efficacy effect of gastric tube injection after water dissolution remains unclear. In the present report, a marked response to lorlatinib in a 49-year-old patient with ALK+ NSCLC who was administered lorlatinib through a gastric tube, was described. The patient had received chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors prior to targeted drug therapy and developed hyperprogression, which was mainly manifested as rapid enlargement of the primary lesion with multiple new systemic metastases, accompanied by poor performance status score, esophageal compression and difficulty eating. The patient was injected with pre-dissolved lorlatinib through the nasogastric tube. After 6 days, related symptoms, such as dyspnea and dysphagia, were relieved. After 18 days, the esophageal stenosis was significantly alleviated, and the gastric tube was removed. In conclusion, gastric tube injection be used as a means of lorlatinib administration in patients with ALK+ NSCLC with dysphagia, regardless of previous immunotherapy-associated hyperprogression.

Sharing Experience with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Lung Cancer: An Italian Expert Panel Discussion

BACKGROUND

ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment and largely improved the survival outcomes of patients with NSCLC harboring ALK rearrangements. Different ALK TKI compounds have demonstrated antitumor activity in these patients and are available in clinical practice. However, clinical expertise across countries varies according to local regulatory approval of different drugs, identifying multiple treatment scenarios to comply with international guidelines and clinical practice.

METHODS

A virtual webinar was held on July 2023 to discuss the state of the art and future perspectives in the treatment of ALK rearrangement in advanced NSCLC in Italy. The faculty hosting the webinar was composed of eight medical oncologists from different regions of Italy with clinical expertise in treating patients with lung cancer. Live-shared notes were used to produce a report to serve as the basis of a review manuscript on the topic.

RESULTS

Alectinib and brigatinib are the preferred front-line treatment options in Italy, pending approval of the front-line medicine lorlatinib, which would be considered among the choices. Due to a local regulatory limitation of second-line lorlatinib, which is not allowed after front-line brigatinib, alectinib is commonly the preferred front-line choice to follow a sequence of alectinib, followed by lorlatinib, followed by platinum plus pemetrexed chemotherapy. Age and performance status were not considered per se as clinical features influencing treatment choice. However, treatment compliance is deemed a relevant factor in decision making with regard to the number of pills to be administered. In general, given the availability of alternative choices, the spectrum of patients' comorbidities and polypharmacotherapy interactions should be taken into account in treatment selection according to the toxicity profile of each compound. In addition, several issues were debated with regard to improving treatment outcomes, including testing, brain metastases, and management of an oligoprogressive disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment scenario of ALK-positive disease is dynamically evolving. Furthermore, not all FDA- and EMA-approved compounds are approved in Italy with the same indications. This influences therapeutic opportunities and increases the need for greater clinical expertise to help and guide treatment selection.

Neoadjuvant Lorlatinib Induces Pathological Complete Response in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer: A Case Report

BACKGROUND Chemotherapy has been the conventional treatment method for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, the identification and comprehension of oncogenic driver alterations have paved the way for targeted therapies, significantly enhancing patient outcomes. The management of locally advanced NSCLC that is positive for ALK presents a challenge due to the lack of reported randomized controlled trials. The efficacy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant targeted therapy in this context remains uncertain. CASE REPORT A 54-year-old man was diagnosed with stage IIIB (pT1N3M0) upper right lung adenocarcinoma carrying the EML4-ALK fusion gene. Clinically, the patient had multiple enlarged lymph nodes in the right hilum and mediastinum, with the largest measuring approximately 28×19 mm by CT scan and we found that the L4 lymph node was invaded by metastasis. Then, the patient received 1 cycle of chemotherapy with paclitaxel in combination with nedaplatin and subsequently received maintenance treatment involving lorlatinib. Two months later, clinical evaluations revealed progressive reduction of the lesions, especially the reduced size of the mediastinal lymph nodes. Therefore, the patient underwent thoracoscopic partial lobectomy and lymphadenectomy and achieved pathological complete response (pCR). After 3 months, a follow-up CT scan was similar to the first postoperative CT scan and no tumor was found. CONCLUSIONS This case demonstrates the potential advantage of lorlatinib as a neoadjuvant therapy in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. It emphasizes the importance of identifying new therapeutic targets by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and implementing precise treatment strategies in clinical practice.

Lorlatinib beyond progression plus platinum/pemetrexed for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients: report of two cases

Lorlatinib is an active treatment for advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pretreated with ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (-TKIs). However, there is paucity of data on the activity of platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy administered at the time of progression on lorlatinib. In addition, it is uncertain whether continuation of lorlatinib beyond progression (LBP) would provide any additional clinical benefit. Here, we describe two cases experiencing an exceptional response to platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy plus LBP and make an attempt to identify which patients' characteristics and biologic profiles of the tumor could predict benefit from such an approach. In this report, presence of controlled brain metastases, rapidly progressing extracranial disease, and presence of ALK-dependent mechanisms of resistance were associated with benefit from platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy plus lorlatinib beyond progression.

Cost-Effectiveness of Lorlatinib for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Spain

Purpose

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of lorlatinib compared to alectinib and brigatinib for the treatment of adult patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously not treated, in Spain.

Methods

A partitioned survival model comprised progression free, non-intracranial progression, intracranial progression, and death health states was constructed to estimate the total costs, life-years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) accumulated in a lifetime horizon. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for lorlatinib were obtained from the CROWN study. For alectinib and brigatinib, a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted to estimate OS and PFS hazard ratios versus crizotinib. Utilities were estimated based on EQ-5D-5L data derived from the CROWN (lorlatinib), ALEX (alectinib) and ALTA-1L (brigatinib) studies. According to the Spanish National Health Service perspective the total costs (expressed in euros using a 2021 cost year) included drug acquisition and the administration's subsequent treatment, ALK+ advanced NSCLC management and adverse-event management, and palliative care. Unitary costs were obtained from local cost databases and literature. Costs, LYGs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to test the model's robustness.

Results

Lorlatinib provided higher health outcomes (+0.70 LYG/patient, +1.42 QALYs/patient) and lower costs (-€9239/patient) than alectinib. Lorlatinib yielded higher LYG (+1.74) and QALYs (+2.30) versus brigatinib but higher costs/patient (+€36,627), resulting in an incremental-cost-effectiveness-ratio of €15,912/QALY gained.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that lorlatinib may be a dominant treatment option versus alectinib. Considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of €25,000/QALY, lorlatinib may be an efficient option compared to brigatinib.

Recent Advances in the Management of Adverse Events Associated with Lorlatinib

As a novel third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), lorlatinib has shown excellent systemic and intracranial activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who carry sensitizing ALK-activating mutations and progress on first- and second-generation TKIs. In comparison with other ALK-TKIs, lorlatinib has a unique safety profile for hyperlipidemia and central nervous system adverse events. Lorlatinib-induced adverse events are well tolerated, permanent discontinuations are rarely reported, and dose modifications and/or standard medical therapy are useful for the management of adverse events. Our present study reviews the safety profile of lorlatinib as well as the relevant management strategies. Our present study aims to provide a practical guide for the scientific management and application of lorlatinib.

Safety of lorlatinib in ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer and management of central nervous system adverse events

The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has made a breakthrough in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, lorlatinib, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated significant systemic and intracranial activity in both first-line and subsequent-line therapy in ALK-positive NSCLC patients. In this review, general characteristics of lorlatinib, its efficacy in the treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC patients and the safety of lorlatinib, particularly addressing central nervous system adverse events, are discussed. Management of central nervous system adverse events, which seem to be specific to lorlatinib therapy, is outlined.

IGF1R Contributes to Cell Proliferation in ALK-Mutated Neuroblastoma with Preference for Activating the PI3K-AKT Signaling Pathway

Aberrant activation of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) by activating point mutation or amplification drives 5-12% of neuroblastoma (NB). Previous work has identified the involvement of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) in a wide range of cancers. We show here that many NB cell lines exhibit IGF1R activity, and that IGF1R inhibition led to decreased cell proliferation to varying degrees in ALK-driven NB cells. Furthermore, combined inhibition of ALK and IGF1R resulted in synergistic anti-proliferation effects, in particular in ALK-mutated NB cells. Mechanistically, both ALK and IGF1R contribute significantly to the activation of downstream PI3K-AKT and RAS-MAPK signaling pathways in ALK-mutated NB cells. However, these two RTKs employ a differential repertoire of adaptor proteins to mediate downstream signaling effects. We show here that ALK signaling led to activation of the RAS-MAPK pathway by preferentially phosphorylating the adaptor proteins GAB1, GAB2, and FRS2, while IGF1R signaling preferentially phosphorylated IRS2, promoting activation of the PI3K-AKT pathway. Together, these findings reveal a potentially important role of the IGF1R RTK in ALK-mutated NB and that co-targeting of ALK and IGF1R may be advantageous in clinical treatment of ALK-mutated NB patients.

Lorlatinib Effectiveness and Quality-of-Life in Patients with ALK-Positive NSCLC Who Had Failed Second-Generation ALK Inhibitors: Canadian Real-World Experience

Lorlatinib is the only targeted therapy approved in Canada to treat patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumor has progressed despite treatment with second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), a patient population with high unmet need and lack of publicly reimbursed targeted treatments in Canada. We prospectively examined the real-world effectiveness and impact of lorlatinib on quality-of-life in 59 lorlatinib-treated patients, characterized as: median age of 62.0 years; 47.5% were female; 32.2% had central nervous system metastases; 50.8% had 2+ prior ALK TKI lines; and alectinib was the most common ALK TKI (72.9%) administered before lorlatinib, including 44.1% who received first-line alectinib. With a median follow-up of 15.3 months (IQR: 6.2-19.2), median time-to-treatment discontinuation of lorlatinib was 15.3 months (95% CI: 7.9-not reached), with 54.2% (95% CI: 40.8-65.9%) of patients without treatment discontinuation at 12 months. At baseline, the mean health utility score (HUS) was 0.744 (SD: 0.200). At 3 months, patients receiving lorlatinib demonstrated a 0.069 (95% CI: 0.020-0.118; p = 0.007) average HUS increase over baseline; HUS was maintained at 6 and 12 months. Thus, patients with ALK-positive NSCLC post second-generation ALK TKI remained on lorlatinib for a meaningful duration of time while their quality-of-life was preserved.

ALESIA 5-Year Update: Alectinib at 600 mg Twice Daily Gives Lorlatinib a Run for Its Money in Asia

Alectinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has demonstrated superior progression-free survival over crizotinib with both 300 mg twice daily (J-ALEX) or 600 mg twice daily (ALEX, ALESIA) dosing in three pivotal clinical trials. Given the similar median PFS achieved in the J-ALEX trial and the Asian subgroup of the ALEX trial, there remains debate about the optimal alectinib dose for Asians. The third pivotal alectinib trial, ALESIA, which was conducted exclusively in Asia to support the registration of alectinib in China, utilized 600 mg alectinib twice daily. The mature PFS was not reached at the initial publication of ALESIA. At ESMO Asia 2022, the 5-year update of ALESIA was presented with an impressive mature investigator-assessed PFS of 41.6 months (95% CI 33.1-58.9), which is numerically longer than the mature PFS of 34.1 months achieved by alectinib at 300 mg twice daily in the J-ALEX trial. Based on these results, as well as retrospective pharmacokinetic and responses and PFS data, Alectinib at 600 mg twice daily is the optimal dose for Asians. This has been based on the ALESIA trial and on the retrospective pharmacokinetic and responses and PFS data and has set the benchmark for ALK TKI as the first-line treatment for advanced ALK+ NSCLC in Asia. Importantly, lorlatinib, another next generation ALK TKI, also achieved an impressive hazard ratio with a still immature PFS in all patients, including Asian patients, in a recent subgroup analysis after a median follow-up time of 36.7 months. We await the final mature PFS of lorlatinib overall and for Asian patients in the CROWN trial to see if lorlatinib will set a new standard.

Treatment of advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC following second-generation ALK-TKI failure

INTRODUCTION

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement is detected in approximately 3-5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting ALK rearrangement (ALK-TKIs) have shown significant efficacy and improved the survival of patients with NSCLC exhibiting ALK rearrangement. However, almost all patients exhibit disease progression during TKI therapy owing to resistance acquired through various molecular mechanisms, including both ALK-dependent and ALK-independent.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we review the mechanisms underlying resistance to second-generation ALK-TKIs, and the clinical management strategies following resistance in patients with ALK rearrangement-positive NSCLC.

EXPERT OPINION

Treatment strategies following the failure of second-generation ALK-TKIs failure should be based on resistant mechanisms. For patients with ALK mutations who exhibit resistance to second-generation ALK-TKIs, lorlatinib is the primary treatment option. However, the identification of resistance profiles of second-generation ALK-TKIs can aid in the selection of an appropriate treatment strategy. In cases of ALK-dependent resistance mutations, lorlatinib could be the first choice as it exhibits the broadest coverage of mutations that lead to resistance against second-generation ALK-TKIs, such as G1202R, and L1196M. In cases of no resistance mutations, atezolizumab, bevacizumab, and platinum-based chemotherapy could be the alternative treatment options.

Plain language summary of the updated results from the CROWN study comparing lorlatinib with crizotinib in people with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?

This summary shows the updated results of an ongoing research study called CROWN that was published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine in December 2022. In the CROWN study, researchers looked at the effects of two study medicines called lorlatinib and crizotinib. The study included people with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that had not been treated previously. All people in the study had cancer cells with changes (known as alterations) in a gene called anaplastic lymphoma kinase, or ALK. This ALK gene is involved in cancer growth. In this updated study, researchers looked at the continued benefit in people who took lorlatinib compared with people who took crizotinib after 3 years.

WHAT DID THIS STUDY FIND?

After 3 years of being observed, people who took lorlatinib were more likely to be alive without their cancer getting worse than people who took crizotinib. At 3 years, 64% of people who took lorlatinib were alive without their cancer getting worse compared with 19% of people who took crizotinib. The cancer was less likely to have spread within or to the brain in people who took lorlatinib than in people who took crizotinib. After 3 years of being observed, 61% of people were still taking lorlatinib and 8% of people were still taking crizotinib. People who took lorlatinib had more severe side effects than people who took crizotinib. However, these side effects were manageable. The most common side effects with lorlatinib were high levels of cholesterol or high levels of triglycerides (a type of fat) in the blood. Life-threatening side effects were seen in 13% of people who took lorlatinib and 8% in crizotinib. Two people who took lorlatinib died because of side effects from lorlatinib.

WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN?

The updated results from the CROWN study showed that a larger percentage of people who took lorlatinib continued to benefit from their treatment after being observed for 3 years compared with those who took crizotinib. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03052608 (phase 3 CROWN study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Dynamic monitoring of circulating tumor DNA to analyze genetic characteristics and resistance profile of lorlatinib in ALK positive previously treated NSCLC

BACKGROUND

To dynamically monitor the changes of genomic characteristics during lorlatinib treatment and analyze the resistance profile of lorlatinib in ALK-positive advanced Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with first- and second-generation ALK inhibitor resistance.

METHODS

Ten eligible patients who were from a phase 2 study in China and admitted to the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital were analyzed. Blood samples were collected for next-generation sequencing (NGS) to characterize genetic variation at baseline, during treatment, and after disease progression.

RESULTS

Among the 10 patients treated with lorlatinib, objective response rate (ORR) was 50%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.3 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 15.6 months. At baseline, the mutation frequency of ALK in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was higher in the group who received two lines of previous anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs), and a similar trend was observed for TP53. After one follow-up cycle, the decreased variant allele frequency (VAF) had a trend to be predictive for responses. In six patients in which blood samples had been taken after lorlatinib resistance, ALK compound mutations were found in three patients (50%), which were G1202R/L1196M, L1196M/D1203N, and G1202R/F1174C. The DNMT3A N403Tfs*4, ERCC3 E259D, and GNAS p.A436_P459del variants were only detected after progression in two of the other three patients without ALK compound mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

The dynamic changes of genomic characteristics during lorlatinib treatment revealed the mutation landscape of Chinese patients with NSCLC after ALK-TKI resistance, indicated that the resistance profile of lorlatinib were heterogeneous, which laid the foundation for subsequent treatment to overcome lorlatinib resistance.

Sustained Improvement in the Management of Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Harboring ALK Translocation: Where Are We Running?

ALK translocation amounts to around 3-7% of all NSCLCs. The clinical features of ALK+ NSCLC are an adenocarcinoma histology, younger age, limited smoking history, and brain metastases. The activity of chemotherapy and immunotherapy is modest in ALK+ disease. Several randomized trials have proven that ALK inhibitors (ALK-Is) have greater efficacy with respect to platinum-based chemotherapy and that second/third generation ALK-Is are better than crizotinib in terms of improvements in median progression-free survival and brain metastases management. Unfortunately, most patients develop acquired resistance to ALK-Is that is mediated by on- and off-target mechanisms. Translational and clinical research are continuing to develop new drugs and/or combinations in order to raise the bar and further improve the results attained up to now. This review summarizes first-line randomized clinical trials of several ALK-Is and the management of brain metastases with a focus on ALK-I resistance mechanisms. The last section addresses future developments and challenges.

From preclinical efficacy to 2022 updated CROWN trial, lorlatinib is the preferred 1st-line treatment of advanced ALK+ NSCLC

Six ALK TKIs (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib, ensartinib) have received first-line treatment indication of advanced ALK+ NSCLC in various countries. In Ba/F3 cells, lorlatinib achieved lowest IC₅₀ among these 6 ALK TKIs against EML4-ALK variant 1 or 3. In 2022, 7 abstracts reported updated efficacy and safety data from CROWN. With a median follow-up time of 36.7 months, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 63.5%. The median PFS of lorlatinib still has not been reached. Post-lorlatinib treatment median PFS2 was 74.0% at 3-years. Lorlatinib-treated Asian patients achieved similar 3-year PFS rate as overall lorlatinib-treated patients. Median PFS was 33.3 months among lorlatinib-treated EML4-ALK v3 patients. CNS AE occurred fewer than 1 per patient over the median follow-up time of 36.7 months and most resolved without intervention. Altogether these data affirm our belief that lorlatinib should be the treatment of choice of advanced ALK+ NSCLC.

Charge Transfer Complex of Lorlatinib with Chloranilic Acid: Characterization and Application to the Development of a Novel 96-Microwell Spectrophotometric Assay with High Throughput

Lorlatinib (LRL) is the first drug of the third generation of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors used a first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study describes, for the first time, the investigations for the formation of a charge transfer complex (CTC) between LRL, as electron donor, with chloranilic acid (CLA), as a π-electron acceptor. The CTC was characterized by ultraviolet (UV)-visible spectrophotometry and computational calculations. The UV-visible spectrophotometry ascertained the formation of the CTC in methanol via formation of a new broad absorption band with maximum absorption peak (λmax) at 530 nm. The molar absorptivity (ε) of the complex was 0.55 × 10³ L mol^-1 cm^-1 and its band gap energy was 2.3465 eV. The stoichiometric ratio of LRL/CLA was found to be 1:2. The association constant of the complex was 0.40 × 10³ L mol^-1, and its standard free energy was -0.15 × 10² J mole^-1. The computational calculation for the atomic charges of an energy minimized LRL molecule was conducted, the sites of interaction on the LRL molecule were assigned, and the mechanism of the reaction was postulated. The reaction was adopted as a basis for developing a novel 96-microwell spectrophotometric method (MW-SPA) for LRL. The assay limits of detection and quantitation were 2.1 and 6.5 µg/well, respectively. The assay was validated, and all validation parameters were acceptable. The assay was implemented successfully with great precision and accuracy to the determination of LRL in its bulk form and pharmaceutical formulation (tablets). This assay is simple, economic, and more importantly has a high-throughput property. Therefore, the assay can be valuable for routine in quality control laboratories for analysis of LRL's bulk form and pharmaceutical tablets.

Novel High-Throughput Microwell Spectrophotometric Assay for One-Step Determination of Lorlatinib, a Novel Potent Drug for the Treatment of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background and Objectives: Lorlatinib (LOR) belongs to the third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors. People who are diagnosed with ALK-positive metastatic and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are eligible to get it as a first-line treatment option after it was given the approval by "the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)". However, no study has described constructing high-throughput analytical methodology for LOR quantitation in dosage form. For the first time, this work details the construction of a high-throughput, innovative microwell spectrophotometric assay (MW-SPA) for single-step assessment of LOR in its tablet form, for use in pharmaceutical quality control. Materials and Methods: Assay depended on charge transfer complex (CTC) formation between LOR, as electron donor, with 2,3-dichloro-3,5-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ), as π-electron acceptor. Reaction conditions were adjusted, the CTC was characterized by ultraviolet (UV)-visible spectrophotometry and computational molecular modeling, and its electronic constants were determined. Site of interaction on LOR molecule was allocated and reaction mechanism was suggested. Under refined optimum reaction conditions, the procedures of MW-SPA were performed in 96-well assay plates, and the responses were recorded by an absorbance plate reader. Validation of the current methodology was performed in accordance with guidelines of "the International Council on Harmonization (ICH)", and all validation parameters were acceptable. Results: Limits of detection and quantitation of MW-SPA were 1.8 and 5.5 µg/well, respectively. The assay was applied with great success for determining LOR in its tablets. Conclusions: This The assay is straightforward, economic and has high-throughput characteristics. Consequently, the assay is recommended as a valuable analytical approach in quality control laboratories for LOR's tablets' analysis.

Real-world therapeutic effectiveness of lorlatinib after alectinib in Japanese patients with ALK-positive NSCLC

Alectinib, an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is the recommended first-line treatment for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. Lorlatinib was approved as a subsequent therapeutic option after progression while receiving ALK TKI treatment. However, data on the use of lorlatinib in the second- or third-line setting after alectinib failure are limited in Japanese patients. This retrospective real-world observational study investigated the clinical effectiveness of lorlatinib in second- or later-line settings after alectinib failure in Japanese patients. Clinical and demographic data collected in the Japan Medical Data Vision (MDV) database between December 2015 and March 2021 were used. Patients diagnosed with lung cancer who received lorlatinib following alectinib failure after the November 2018 marketing approval of lorlatinib in Japan were included. Of 1954 patients treated with alectinib, 221 were identified from the MDV database as receiving lorlatinib after November 2018. The median age of these patients was 62 years. Second-line lorlatinib treatment was reported for 154 patients (70%); third- or later-line lorlatinib treatment was reported for 67 patients (30%). The median duration of treatment (mDOT) for all lorlatinib-treated patients was 161 days (95% CI, 126-248), and 83 patients (37.6%) continued treatment after data cutoff (March 31, 2021). mDOTs of 147 days (95% CI, 113-242) and 244 days (95% CI, 109 to not reached) were reported with second-line and third- or later-line treatment, respectively. Consistent with clinical trial data, this real-world observational study supports data suggesting the effectiveness of lorlatinib after alectinib failure in Japanese patients.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons of Lorlatinib Versus Chemotherapy for Patients With Second-Line or Later Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the relative efficacy of lorlatinib, an anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with chemotherapy, for patients with second-line or later advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer. The endpoints of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS

Evidence for lorlatinib was informed by the single-arm phase I/II trial B7461001. A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to identify OS and PFS data for chemotherapy. Unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) between lorlatinib and chemotherapy (pemetrexed/docetaxel, platinum-based, or systemic therapy) were performed.

RESULTS

The SLR identified 3 relevant studies reporting PFS. Lorlatinib was associated with a significant decrease in the hazard of progression versus the 2 types of chemotherapy assessed. For PFS, the MAIC of lorlatinib versus the combined treatment arm of docetaxel or pemetrexed resulted in an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.31). When lorlatinib was compared with platinum-based chemotherapy through an MAIC, the adjusted HR for PFS was 0.40 (95% CI 0.29-0.55). An exploratory comparison was performed for OS with evidence for systemic therapy (assumed equivalent to chemotherapy) not identified in the SLR. Lorlatinib provided a significant decrease in hazard of death (OS) versus systemic therapy, with HRs ranging from 0.12 (95% CI 0.05-0.27) to 0.43 (95% CI 0.27-0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

Lorlatinib demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS compared with chemotherapy, although limitations in the analyses were identified. The evidence informing OS comparisons was highly limited but suggested benefit of lorlatinib compared with systemic therapy.

Case report: ATIC-ALK fusion in infant-type hemispheric glioma and response to lorlatinib

Introduction

Infant type hemispheric gliomas are a rare tumor with unique molecular characteristics. In many cases these harbor mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase pathways and respond to targeted therapy. Here we describe the case of an infant with this type of tumor with a novel ATIC-ALK fusion that has responded dramatically to the ALK inhibitor lorlatinib, despite being refractory to standard chemotherapy.

Case description

The infant was initially treated with standard chemotherapy and found to have an ATIC-ALK fusion. When surveillance imaging revealed progressive disease, the patient was switched to the ALK-inhibitor lorlatinib at 47 mg/m²/day. The patient demonstrated a significant clinical and radiographic response to the ALK inhibitor lorlatinib after just 3 months of treatment and a near complete response by 6 months of therapy.

Conclusion

The ALK inhibitor lorlatinib is an effective targeted therapy in infant type hemispheric glioma patients harboring ATIC-ALK fusion.

Silibinin Overcomes EMT-Driven Lung Cancer Resistance to New-Generation ALK Inhibitors

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) may drive the escape of ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors from ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We investigated whether first-generation ALK-TKI therapy-induced EMT promotes cross-resistance to new-generation ALK-TKIs and whether this could be circumvented by the flavonolignan silibinin, an EMT inhibitor. ALK-rearranged NSCLC cells acquiring a bona fide EMT phenotype upon chronic exposure to the first-generation ALK-TKI crizotinib exhibited increased resistance to second-generation brigatinib and were fully refractory to third-generation lorlatinib. Such cross-resistance to new-generation ALK-TKIs, which was partially recapitulated upon chronic TGFβ stimulation, was less pronounced in ALK-rearranged NSCLC cells solely acquiring a partial/hybrid E/M transition state. Silibinin overcame EMT-induced resistance to brigatinib and lorlatinib and restored their efficacy involving the transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ)/SMAD signaling pathway. Silibinin deactivated TGFβ-regulated SMAD2/3 phosphorylation and suppressed the transcriptional activation of genes under the control of SMAD binding elements. Computational modeling studies and kinase binding assays predicted a targeted inhibitory binding of silibinin to the ATP-binding pocket of TGFβ type-1 receptor 1 (TGFBR1) and TGFBR2 but solely at the two-digit micromolar range. A secretome profiling confirmed the ability of silibinin to normalize the augmented release of TGFβ into the extracellular fluid of ALK-TKIs-resistant NSCLC cells and reduce constitutive and inducible SMAD2/3 phosphorylation occurring in the presence of ALK-TKIs. In summary, the ab initio plasticity along the EMT spectrum may explain the propensity of ALK-rearranged NSCLC cells to acquire resistance to new-generation ALK-TKIs, a phenomenon that could be abrogated by the silibinin-driven attenuation of the TGFβ/SMAD signaling axis in mesenchymal ALK-rearranged NSCLC cells.

Pan-HER inhibitors overcome lorlatinib resistance caused by NRG1/HER3 activation in ALK-rearranged lung cancer

Lorlatinib, a third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with a broad coverage against ALK mutations, has demonstrated dramatic effects in patients with ALK-rearranged lung cancer. The mechanisms of acquired resistance to lorlatinib by secondary ALK compound mutations have recently been reported; however, resistance mechanisms other than secondary mutations remain unclear. Here, we investigated the molecular mechanisms of the acquired resistance in ALK-rearranged lung cancer cells in vitro. We established two different lorlatinib-resistant ALK-rearranged lung cancer cell lines (H3122LR and A925LLR) via long-term administration of lorlatinib. These resistant cells did not harbor the secondary ALK mutations and showed cross-resistance to the other kinds of ALK-TKIs (crizotinib or alectinib) compared with the parental cells; however, these resistant cells overexpressed the phosphorylated human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) protein and the ligand of HER3 (neuregulin 1; NRG1). Pharmacological inhibition of HER3 with pan-HER inhibitors or genetic knockdown of HER3 with siRNA resensitized H3122LR and A925LLR cells to lorlatinib in vitro, indicating that H3122LR and A925LLR acquired resistance by NRG1/HER3 activation. These findings demonstrated that targeting NRG1/HER3 is a potential novel therapeutic option for lorlatinib-resistant ALK-rearranged lung cancer.

Silibinin Suppresses the Hyperlipidemic Effects of the ALK-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Lorlatinib in Hepatic Cells

The third-generation anaplastic lymphoma tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ALK-TKI) lorlatinib has a unique side effect profile that includes hypercholesteremia and hypertriglyceridemia in >80% of lung cancer patients. Here, we tested the hypothesis that lorlatinib might directly promote the accumulation of cholesterol and/or triglycerides in human hepatic cells. We investigated the capacity of the hepatoprotectant silibinin to modify the lipid-modifying activity of lorlatinib. To predict clinically relevant drug−drug interactions if silibinin were used to clinically manage lorlatinib-induced hyperlipidemic effects in hepatic cells, we also explored the capacity of silibinin to interact with and block CYP3A4 activity using in silico computational descriptions and in vitro biochemical assays. A semi-targeted ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography accurate mass quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization (UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS)-based lipidomic approach revealed that short-term treatment of hepatic cells with lorlatinib promotes the accumulation of numerous molecular species of cholesteryl esters and triglycerides. Silibinin treatment significantly protected the steady-state lipidome of hepatocytes against the hyperlipidemic actions of lorlatinib. Lipid staining confirmed the ability of lorlatinib to promote neutral lipid overload in hepatocytes upon long-term exposure, which was prevented by co-treatment with silibinin. Computational analyses and cell-free biochemical assays predicted a weak to moderate inhibitory activity of clinically relevant concentrations of silibinin against CYP3A4 when compared with recommended (rosuvastatin) and non-recommended (simvastatin) statins for lorlatinib-associated dyslipidemia. The elevated plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels in lorlatinib-treated lung cancer patients might involve primary alterations in the hepatic accumulation of lipid intermediates. Silibinin could be clinically explored to reduce the undesirable hyperlipidemic activity of lorlatinib in lung cancer patients.

Brigatinib for Pretreated, ALK-Positive, Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancers: Long-Term Follow-Up and Focus on Post-Brigatinib Lorlatinib Efficacy in the Multicenter, Real-World BrigALK2 Study

Brigatinib is a next-generation ALK inhibitor (ALKi) that shows efficacy in ALK inhibitor naïve and post-crizotinib ALK+ advanced NSCLCs (aNSCLCs). The efficacy of brigatinib was retrospectively assessed in patients with aNSCLCs included in the brigatinib French Early-Access Program (1 August 2016−21 January 2019). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (invPFS) and the primary analysis was updated in 2021 with a longer follow-up, focused on post-brigatinib lorlatinib efficacy. Sixty-six centers included 183 patients: median age 60 ± 12.7 years; 78.3% never/former smokers; median of 3 ± 1 previous lines and 2 ± 0.5 ALKis; 37.1% ECOG PS 2 and 55.6% >3 metastatic sites. The median follow-up from brigatinib initiation was 40.4 months (95% CI 38.4−42.4). InvPFS was 7.4 months (95% CI 5.9−9.6), median duration of treatment (mDOT) was 7.3 months (95% CI 5.8−9.4) and median overall survival (mOS) was 20.3 months (95% CI 15.6−27.6). The median DOT and OS from brigatinib initiation tend to decrease with the number of ALK inhibitors used in previous lines of therapy. Based on the data collected, 92 (50.3%) patients received ≥1 agent(s) post-brigatinib and 68 (73.9%) of them received lorlatinib, with 51 (75%) immediately receiving it post-brigatinib, 12 (17.6%) receiving it after one and 5 (7.4%) after ≥2 subsequent treatments. The median follow-up was 29.9 (95% CI 25.7−33.1) months. Lorlatinib mDOT was 5.3 (95% CI 3.6−7.6) months with a median OS from lorlatinib initiation of 14.1 (95% CI 10.3−19.2) months. The results of the brigALK2 study confirm the efficacy of brigatinib in a population of heavily pretreated ALK+ aNSCLC patients and provide new data on the activity of lorlatinib after brigatinib.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Lorlatinib in Patients Previously Treated with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Greece

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for about 80%-85% of lungcancer cases, is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Lorlatinib is a potent third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC previously treated with at least one second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Objective: The present study assessed the cost-effectiveness of lorlatinib vs pemetrexed with platinum combination of carboplatin or cisplatin (P-ChT) in Greece. Methods: A partitioned survival model with three health states, referring to pre-progression, progressed disease, and death, was locally adapted from a Greek payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Clinical and safety data and utility values applied in the model were extracted from the literature. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of lorlatinib and P-ChT was performed. Only direct medical costs (€) from 2020 were included in the analysis. Primary outcomes were patient life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per QALY and LY gained. All future outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for model uncertainty. Results: The analysis showed that, over a lifetime horizon, the estimated total costs of lorlatinib and P-ChT were €81 754 and €12 343, respectively. Lorlatinib was more effective than P-ChT with 2.4 and 1.5 more LYs and QALYs gained, respectively. The generated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of lorlatinib compared with P-ChT were €28 613 per LY gained and €46 102 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the deterministic results. Conclusion: The present analysis suggests that lorlatinib may be considered as a cost-effective option compared with P-ChT in Greece for the treatment of patients with advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC whose disease has progressed after at least one second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In addition, this option addresses a significant unmet medical need.

Continuation of Lorlatinib in ALK-positive NSCLC Beyond Progressive Disease

INTRODUCTION

Lorlatinib, a potent, selective third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ALK TKI), showed overall and intracranial anti-tumor activity in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Retrospective analyses in the ongoing phase II trial (NCT01970865) investigated clinical benefit of continuing lorlatinib beyond progressive disease (LBPD). Patients with prior crizotinib as the only ALK TKI were Group A (n = 28); those with ≥1 prior second-generation ALK TKIs were Group B (n = 74). LBPD was defined as >3 weeks of lorlatinib treatment after investigator-assessed progressive disease. Only patients with a best overall response of complete or partial response or stable disease were included.

RESULTS

There were no major differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Median duration of treatment for LBPD patients was 32.4 months (Group A) and 16.4 months (Group B) versus 12.5 months (Group A) and 7.7 months (Group B) for non-LBPD patients. Median overall survival (OS) in Group A was not reached (NR) in LBPD patients versus 24.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.1-NR); Group B median was 26.5 months (95% CI 18.7-35.5) in LBPD patients versus 14.7 months (95% CI 9.3-38.5) in non-LBPD patients. Median OS post-progression for Groups A and B was NR (95% CI 21.4-NR) and 14.6 months (95% CI 11.2-19.2) in LBPD patients, and 8.0 months (95% CI 1.5-NR) versus 5.3 months (95% CI 2.8-14.3) in non-LBPD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuing LBPD is a viable treatment option for select patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who progressed on lorlatinib.

Acute worsening of glycemic control in a patient with type 2 diabetes and non-small cell lung cancer after administration of lorlatinib

A patient with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) exhibited extreme hyperglycemia after lorlatinib treatment. The present case highlights the importance of glucose monitoring during lorlatinib administration and intensifying hyperglycemia treatment.

Efficacy and Drug Resistance Analysis of ALK Inhibitors in Combination with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Treating Lung Squamous Carcinoma Patient Harboring EML4-ALK Rearrangement

EML4-ALK rearrangement is common in lung adenocarcinoma. The ALK inhibitors remarkably inhibit lung adenocarcinoma and reveal long-term beneficial effects in several patients. Advanced genetic testing technology reveals that EML4-ALK rearrangement has been observed in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma. In the present study, we report a case of a 53-year-old patient with EML4-ALK rearranged in lung squamous carcinoma; PET/CT scan revealed brain and multiple bone metastases. First-line ALK-TKI combined with local stereotactic body radiation therapy indicated progression-free survival of 9 months. After progressive disease, treatment was switched to lorlatinib, with little efficacy and a total overall survival of 11 months. The emergence of drug resistance revealed that the genetic test result was EML4-ALK fusion (V3a/b variants), indicating a poor prognosis. In this study, we analyzed the treatment efficacy of ALK inhibitors and provided a research basis for the treatment of EML4-ALK rearranged in lung squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Plain language summary of the CROWN study comparing lorlatinib with crizotinib for people with untreated non-small cell lung cancer

This is a summary of a research study (known as a clinical trial) called CROWN. The study tested two medicines called lorlatinib and crizotinib in participants with untreated non-small cell lung cancer that had spread to other parts of their body. All those who took part had changes in a gene called ALK, which is involved in cell growth. In total, 296 participants from 23 countries took part. Half the participants took lorlatinib and half took crizotinib. After participants started taking lorlatinib or crizotinib, they were checked regularly to see if their tumors had grown or spread to other parts of their body (known as tumor progression) and to monitor any side effects. After 1 year of treatment, the participants who took lorlatinib were twice as likely to be alive with no tumor growth as the participants who took crizotinib. More participants who took lorlatinib had cancer that shrank (76%) compared with the participants who took crizotinib (58%). This was also true of the participants whose cancer had spread to their brain. The most common side effects in participants who took lorlatinib were increases in the amount of cholesterol and triglycerides (a type of fat) in their blood, swelling, weight gain, nerve damage, unclear thoughts, and diarrhea. Among the participants who took crizotinib, the most common side effects were diarrhea, feeling like you want to throw up, sight problems, swelling, vomiting, changes in liver function, and feeling tired. Overall, the CROWN study showed that fewer participants with advanced ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer died or had tumor growth with lorlatinib compared with crizotinib treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT number: NCT03052608.

Successful treatment with lorlatinib in a patient with meningeal carcinomatosis of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer resistant to alectinib and brigatinib: A case report

RATIONALE

Although anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors are effective treatment options for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, achieving long-term survival in patients with NSCLC with meningeal carcinomatosis resistant to ALK inhibitors is difficult. Lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK inhibitor, was designed for selective CNS penetration, and exerts potent antitumor activity against tumors resistant to first- and/or second-generation ALK inhibitors. However, there is limited information about the activity of lorlatinib in ALK inhibitor-resistant meningeal carcinomatosis. Here, we report a case of ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma with meningeal carcinomatosis in which lorlatinib was used after resistance to alectinib and brigatinib.

PATIENTS CONCERNS

A 55-year-old woman with no history of smoking presented to our hospital with a swelling on the left neck. Clinical imaging and histopathological examination revealed a tumor of adenocarcinoma histology in the left upper lung with no CNS metastasis.

DIAGNOSES

The patient was diagnosed with ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma (cT3N3M1b: stage IVA).

INTERVENTIONS

She received the second-generation ALK inhibitors, alectinib and brigatinib, in the first and second-line settings, respectively. However, she developed meningeal carcinomatosis. Hence, treatment with lorlatinib was initiated in the third-line setting.

OUTCOMES

The symptoms associated with meningeal carcinomatosis, such as disturbance of consciousness and diplopia, improved dramatically. At 8 months from the initiation of lorlatinib, the patient remained well without disease progression.

LESSONS

Lorlatinib is an effective treatment option for patient with ALK-positive NSCLC who develop meningeal carcinomatosis resistant to second-generation ALK inhibitors. Therefore, lorlatinib should be considered in such cases, even when patients exhibit serious symptoms associated with meningeal carcinomatosis.

A Comprehensive Analysis of Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Reveals Novel Biomarkers and Mechanistic Insights on Lorlatinib Crosses the Blood-Brain Barrier

Of late, lorlatinib has played an increasingly pivotal role in the treatment of brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer. However, its pharmacokinetics in the brain and the mechanism of entry are still controversial. The purpose of this study was to explore the mechanisms of brain penetration by lorlatinib and identify potential biomarkers for the prediction of lorlatinib concentration in the brain. Detection of lorlatinib in lorlatinib-administered mice and control mice was performed using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Metabolomics and transcriptomics were combined to investigate the pathway and relationships between metabolites and genes. Multilayer perceptron was applied to construct an artificial neural network model for prediction of the distribution of lorlatinib in the brain. Nine biomarkers related to lorlatinib concentration in the brain were identified. A metabolite-reaction-enzyme-gene interaction network was built to reveal the mechanism of lorlatinib. A multilayer perceptron model based on the identified biomarkers provides a prediction accuracy rate of greater than 85%. The identified biomarkers and the neural network constructed with these metabolites will be valuable for predicting the concentration of drugs in the brain. The model provides a lorlatinib to treat tumor brain metastases in the clinic.

Liver Toxicity Observed With Lorlatinib When Combined With Strong CYP3A Inducers: Evaluation of Cynomolgus Monkey as a Nonclinical Model for Assessing the Mechanism of Combinational Toxicity

Lorlatinib is a potent small-molecule anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. In a drug-drug interaction study in healthy human participants, liver enzyme elevations were observed when a single 100 mg dose of lorlatinib was administered after multiple doses of rifampin, a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inducer and a pregnane X receptor (PXR) agonist. A series of in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted to evaluate potential mechanisms for the observed clinical toxicity. To investigate the involvement of CYP3A and/or PXR in the observed liver toxicity, studies were conducted in cynomolgus monkeys administered lorlatinib alone or with coadministration of multiple doses of known CYP3A inducers that are predominantly PXR agonists (rifampin, St. John's wort) or predominantly constitutive androstane receptor agonists (carbamazepine, phenytoin) and a net CYP3A inhibitory PXR agonist (ritonavir). Results from the investigative studies identified cynomolgus monkeys as a pharmacologically relevant nonclinical model, which recapitulated the elevated liver function test results observed in humans. Furthermore, liver toxicity was only observed in this model when lorlatinib was coadministered with strong CYP3A inducers, and the effects were not restricted to, or exclusively dependent upon, a PXR activation mechanism. These results generated mechanistic insights on the liver enzyme elevations observed in the clinical drug-drug interaction study and provided guidance on appropriate product safety label for lorlatinib.

Lorlatinib-induced visual and auditory hallucinations: A case report

Lorlatinib can cause visual and auditory hallucinations. And, it is necessary to keep in mind that hallucinations can persist even after discontinuation in patients who develop hallucinations while receiving lorlatinib.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Lorlatinib and Alectinib for ALK-Rearrangement Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Asian and Non-Asian Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

The treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement-positive (ALK-p) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a challenge. We compared the safety and efficacy of lorlatinib and alectinib in patients with ALK-p ALK-inhibitor‒naïve advanced NSCLC (in overall participants and in the Asian and non-Asian subgroups). The results showed that in the overall participant group, the efficacy of lorlatinib and alectinib was not significantly different in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Although in the Asian subgroup, PFS was not significantly different upon treatment with lorlatinib or alectinib, in the non-Asian subgroup, PFS was significantly better in response to lorlatinib than with alectinib. Grade 3 or higher adverse events in the overall participant group were significantly more frequent with lorlatinib than with alectinib. These results will provide valuable information that would enable the improvement of treatment strategies for ALK-p ALK-inhibitor‒naïve advanced NSCLC.

Abstract

To date, there have been no head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the safety and efficacy of lorlatinib and alectinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement-positive (ALK-p) ALK-inhibitor‒naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We performed a network meta-analysis comparing six treatment arms (lorlatinib, brigatinib, alectinib, ceritinib, crizotinib, and platinum-based chemotherapy) in overall participants and in Asian and non-Asian subgroups. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade 3 or higher adverse events (G3-AEs). There were no significant differences between lorlatinib and alectinib in overall participants for both PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.742; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.466–1.180) and OS (HR, 1.180; 95% CrI, 0.590–2.354). In the Asian subgroup, there were no significant differences in PFS between lorlatinib and alectinib (HR, 1.423; 95% CrI, 0.748–2.708); however, in the non-Asian subgroup, PFS was significantly better with lorlatinib than with alectinib (HR, 0.388; 95% CrI, 0.195–0.769). The incidence of G3-AEs in overall participants was significantly higher with lorlatinib than with alectinib (risk ratio, 1.918; 95% CrI, 1.486–2.475). These results provide valuable information regarding the safety and efficacy of lorlatinib in ALK-p ALK-inhibitor‒naïve advanced NSCLC. Larger head-to-head RCTs are needed to validate the study results.

Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Effects of the Proton Pump Inhibitor Rabeprazole and Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Lorlatinib in Healthy Participants

Lorlatinib is approved worldwide as treatment for anaplastic lymphoma kinase‐positive and c‐ros oncogene 1‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer. The objectives of this phase 1, open‐label crossover study (NCT02569554) in healthy adult participants were to determine (1) the effects of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) rabeprazole on lorlatinib pharmacokinetics (PK), (2) the effects of a high‐fat meal on lorlatinib PK, and (3) the relative bioavailability of an oral solution to tablet formulation of lorlatinib under fasted conditions. Participants were followed on‐study for ≥50 days after the first dose of lorlatinib. Participants received treatments over 4 periods, with a washout of ≥10 days between consecutive lorlatinib doses. Twenty‐seven participants were enrolled and received lorlatinib, and all were assessed for PK and safety. Results showed no effect of multiple doses of rabeprazole on the total plasma exposure of a single oral dose of lorlatinib 100‐mg tablets. The results also indicated that a high‐fat meal had no effect on lorlatinib PK after a single 100‐mg oral dose. In addition, the relative bioavailability of lorlatinib oral solution compared with lorlatinib tablets was complete (approximately 108%). The safety profile of lorlatinib was consistent with that reported in previous studies, and most treatment‐related adverse events were mild to moderate. These data indicate that lorlatinib can be administered with drugs that modify gastric acid, including PPIs, without restriction. These results also confirm that lorlatinib can be administered regardless of food intake.

BioID-Screening Identifies PEAK1 and SHP2 as Components of the ALK Proximitome in Neuroblastoma Cells

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) that is mutated in approximately 10% of pediatric neuroblastoma (NB). To shed light on ALK-driven signaling processes, we employed BioID-based in vivo proximity labeling to identify molecules that interact intracellularly with ALK. NB-derived SK-N-AS and SK-N-BE(2) cells expressing inducible ALK-BirA* fusion proteins were generated and stimulated with ALKAL ligands in the presence and absence of the ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) lorlatinib. LC/MS-MS analysis identified multiple proteins, including PEAK1 and SHP2, which were validated as ALK interactors in NB cells. Further analysis of the ALK-SHP2 interaction confirmed that the ALK-SHP2 interaction as well as SHP2-Y542 phosphorylation was dependent on ALK activation. Use of the SHP2 inhibitors, SHP099 and RMC-4550, resulted in inhibition of cell growth in ALK-driven NB cells. In addition, we noted a strong synergistic effect of combined ALK and SHP2 inhibition that was specific to ALK-driven NB cells, suggesting a potential therapeutic option for ALK-driven NB.