The Wilms' tumor (WT1) gene expression correlates with the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) score in patients with myelofibrosis and it is a marker of response to therapy

The Combination of JAK2V617F Allele Burden and WT1 Expression can Be Helpful in Distinguishing the Subtype of MPN Patients

INTRODUCTION

Classical Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) includes Essential Thrombocythemia (ET), Polycythemia Vera (PV) and Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF). The JAK2V617F mutation is part of the major criteria for diagnosis of MPN. WT1 is reported to be highly overexpressed in most hematological malignancy. Our aim was to explore the combination value of JAK2V617F allele burden and WT1 expression in distinguishing the subtype of MPN patients.

METHODS

Allele specific real-time quantitative fluorescence PCR (AS-qPCR) was conducted to detect JAK2V617F allele burden. WT1 expression was assessed by RQ-PCR. Our study is a retrospective study.

RESULTS

JAK2V617F allele burden and WT1 expression were different in MPN subgroups. The expression of WT1 in PMF and PV is higher than in ET. JAK2V617F allele burden in PMF and PV is also higher than in ET. ROC analysis indicated that combination of JAK2V617F allele burden and WT1 expression to discriminate ET and PV, ET and PMF, PV and PMF is 0.956, 0.871, 0.737 respectively. Furthermore, their ability to distinguish ET patients with high Hb levels from PV patients with high platelet counts is 0.891.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data revealed that combination of JAK2V617F allele burden and WT1 expression is useful in distinguishing the subtype of MPN patients.

Clinical features and next-generation sequencing landscape of essential thrombocythemia, prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis, and overt fibrotic primary myelofibrosis: a Chinese monocentric retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Since prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) was recognized as a separate entity in the 2016 revised classification of MPN differed from essential thrombocythemia (ET) or overt fibrotic primary myelofibrosis (overt PMF), it has been a subject of debate among experts due to its indefinite diagnosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical parameters, haematologic information, and genetic mutations of patients who were diagnosed with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) according to the WHO 2016 criteria in China, including 56 ET patients, 19 pre-PMF patients, and 43 overt PMF patients.

RESULTS

Pre-PMF patients exhibited higher leukocyte counts [14.2(6.0-28.1) × 10⁹/L vs 9.6(4.0-55.0) × 10⁹/L, P = 0.003], LDH values [307(233-479)U/L vs 241(129-1182)U/L, P < 0.001], onset ages [67(32-76) years vs 50(16-79) years, P = 0.006], a higher frequency of splenomegaly(47.4% vs 16.7%, P = 0.018) and hypertension (57.9 vs 23.2%, P = 0.005) than ET patients. On the other hand, pre-PMF patients had higher platelet counts [960(500-2245) × 10⁹/L vs 633(102-1720) × 10⁹/L, P = 0.017], haemoglobin levels [152(115-174)g/L vs 119(71-200)g/L, P = 0.003], lower LDH values [307(233-479)U/L vs 439(134-8100)U/L, P = 0.007] and a lower frequency of splenomegaly(47.4 vs 75.6%, P = 0.031) than overt PMF patients. Next-generation sequencing landscape was performed in 50 patients, revealed the frequency of EP300 mutations was significantly increased in pre-PMF patients compared with ET and overt PMF patients (60 vs 10 vs 15.79%, P = 0.033), and WT1 was more often overexpressed (WT1/ABL1 copies ≥ 1.0%) in patients with overt PMF than in those with ET or pre-PMF(54.55 vs 16.67 vs 17.65%, P = 0.009). In terms of outcome, male sex, along with symptoms including MPN10, anaemia (haemoglobin < 120 g/L), thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100 × 10⁹/L), leucocytosis (leukocyte counts > 13 × 10⁹/L), high LDH value (> 350U/L), splenomegaly, WT1 overexpression(WT1/ABL1 copies ≥ 1.0%), KMT2A, ASXL1 and TP53 mutations, indicated a poor prognosis for PMF patients.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicated that a comprehensive evaluation of BM features, clinical phenotypes, haematologic parameters, and molecular profiles is needed for the accurate diagnosis and treatment of ET, pre-PMF, and overt PMF patients.

Wilms' tumor 1 gene in hematopoietic malignancies: clinical implications and future directions

The Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) gene is an important regulatory molecule that plays a vital role in cell growth and development. Initially, knowledge of WT1 was mostly limited to Wilms' tumor. Over the past years, numerous studies have shown that WT1 is aberrant expressed or mutated in hematopoietic malignancies, including acute leukemia (AL), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Currently, many studies focus on exploring the role of WT1 in hematopoietic malignancies. Such studies improve the understanding of hematopoietic malignancies, and the collection of data about WT1 expression or mutation in hematopoietic malignancies over the past years can facilitate the risk stratification of hematopoietic malignancies. In this review, we highlight the important role of WT1 in hematopoietic malignancies, discuss its potential clinical applications as a minimal residual disease (MRD) and prognostic biomarker, and evaluate the possible therapy target of WT1 in hematopoietic malignancies.

WT1 gene is overexpressed in myeloproliferative neoplasms, especially in myelofibrosis

Classical Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms include Polycythemia Vera (PV), Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) and Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF). They are characterized by the presence of driver mutations of JAK2, CALR or MPL genes. Overexpression of WT1 is used as a marker of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia, especially after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). We investigated WT1 expression at diagnosis in 152 MPN patients and showed that the WT1 transcript was overexpressed in PMFs and PVs compared to controls. In particular, WT1 transcript levels were higher in PMF than in ET and PV. WT1 transcript levels were significantly increased during myelofibrotic transformation of ET or PV. Using multivariate linear regression, high WT1 transcript levels in PMF were associated with age over 65, splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia. The ROC curve analysis showed that a level of WT1 transcript >10 WT1 copies/10⁴ABL1 enabled the diagnosis of PMF with a specificity of 95.8% (PMF vs ET; ROC AUC = 0.91). In myelofibrosis, studying follow-ups of WT1 transcript showed that this marker is of interest after allogeneic SCT. These results demonstrate that WT1 overexpression is a simple marker of myelofibrosis in MPN and could be used during patient follow-up.

The diverse expression of the WT1 gene in patients with acquired bone marrow failure syndromes

Acquired bone marrow failure syndromes (aBMFS) encompass a wide range of diseases. A study to investigate WT1 expression in BM was conducted in 387 patients with aBMFS in China. The WT1 level in patients with aplastic anemia (AA) was significantly lower than that in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH, p = .023) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, p < .001). In addition, the WT1 level in patients with MDS significantly increased as the disease progressed to an advanced stage. Patients with hypoplastic MDS had a differentiated expression level of WT1 compared with that of NSAA (p < .001). Furthermore, post-treatment patients of AA with partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) status had relatively higher WT1 levels than those with naive AA (p = .017, p = .003, respectively). Thus, the WT1 expression level could be a useful genetic marker for routine clinical work in aBMFS.

The Wilms' tumor (WT1) gene expression correlates with the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) score in patients with myelofibrosis and it is a marker of response to therapy

The Wilms tumor gene WT1 is a useful marker of clonal hematopoiesis and it has been shown to be a good marker of residual disease and it reflects the response to therapy. Although myelofibrosis is characterized by mutations of JAK2 and calreticulin (CALR), these mutations are not useful to monitor response to therapy. In this study we demonstrated that in patients affected by myelofibrosis WT1 correlates with the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) score at diagnosis. Furthermore WT1 is a good marker of response to JAK2 inhibitors especially for patients without blasts and for patients who develop anemia or thrombocytopenia not for progression but as therapy related toxicity. Finally, WT1 transcript reduction can mirror a benefit of therapy on the disease burden. This study demonstrated that WT1 is a good marker for monitoring the response to therapy in patients affected by myelofibrosis.