Initial clinical experience with distal protection using the FilterWire in patients undergoing coronary artery and saphenous vein graft percutaneous intervention

A fresh look at coronary microembolization

Mechanical stress from haemodynamic perturbations or interventional manipulation of epicardial coronary atherosclerotic plaques with inflammatory destabilization can release particulate debris, thrombotic material and soluble substances into the coronary circulation. The physical material obstructs the coronary microcirculation, whereas the soluble substances induce endothelial dysfunction and facilitate vasoconstriction. Coronary microvascular obstruction and dysfunction result in patchy microinfarcts accompanied by an inflammatory reaction, both of which contribute to progressive myocardial contractile dysfunction. In clinical studies, the benefit of protection devices to retrieve atherothrombotic debris during percutaneous coronary interventions has been modest, and the treatment of microembolization has mostly relied on antiplatelet and vasodilator agents. The past 25 years have witnessed a relative proportional increase in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the presentation of acute coronary syndromes. An associated increase in the incidence of plaque erosion rather than rupture has also been recognized as a key mechanism in the past decade. We propose that coronary microembolization is a decisive link between plaque erosion at the culprit lesion and the manifestation of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. In this Review, we characterize the features and mechanisms of coronary microembolization and discuss the clinical trials of drugs and devices for prevention and treatment.

Effects of liraglutide on no-reflow in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The 'no-reflow' phenomenon after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a strong predictor of both short- and long-term mortality. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) exerts a cardioprotective effect during ischemia reperfusion injury. We planned to evaluate the effects of liraglutide on myocardial no-reflow after PCI for STEMI.

METHODS

A total of 284 patients with STEMI undergoing PCI were enrolled in this study between September 2013 and March 2015. Of these, 210 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either liraglutide or placebo 30 min before PCI (1.8 mg).

RESULTS

The primary end point, the prevalence of no-reflow, was significantly lower in the liraglutide group than in the control group (5% vs. 15%, P=0.01). Administration of liraglutide was consistently identified as a significant determinant for no-reflow ratio. There was a significant decrease in serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels at 6-hour reperfusion in the liraglutide group compared to the control group (0.87 ± 0.09 mg/dL vs. 0.96 ± 0.10mg/dL, P<0.001). During a 3-month follow-up period, no difference was observed in the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular event.

CONCLUSIONS

Liraglutide may be associated with less no-reflow in STEMI, which should be confirmed by larger-scale trials.

Coronary microembolization: from bedside to bench and back to bedside

Coronary microembolization from the erosion or rupture of a vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque occurs spontaneously in acute coronary syndromes and iatrogenically during percutaneous coronary interventions. Typical consequences of coronary microembolization are microinfarcts with an inflammatory response, contractile dysfunction, and reduced coronary reserve. Apart from transient elevations of creatine kinase and troponin, microemboli can be visualized by intracoronary Doppler and the resulting microinfarcts by late-enhancement nuclear magnetic resonance. Statins, antiplatelet agents, and coronary vasodilators protect against microembolization and microinfarction when started before percutaneous coronary interventions. Distal protection devices can retrieve atherothrombotic debris and prevent its embolization into the microcirculation, but their effect on clinical outcome has been disappointing so far, except for saphenous vein bypass grafts. Devices for aspiration of thrombi and thrombus-derived vasoconstrictor, thrombogenic, and inflammatory substances, however, reduce thrombus burden, improve perfusion, and provide protection in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Clinical experiences using the FilterWire EX for distal embolic protection during complex percutaneous coronary interventions

BACKGROUND

Distal embolization during coronary angioplasty may result in vessel occlusion, no reflow and myonecrosis. This study tested the authors' clinical experiences using a guidewire system designed to preserve distal flow during angioplasty.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The FilterWire EX trade mark (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) consists of a 0.014-inch guidewire on which an expandable loop structure is attached to a porous polyurethane membrane. The assembly is delivered across the target lesion, followed by deployment of the filter distal to the lesion. Procedural and angiographic outcome data were obtained from patients undergoing saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) (n = 16) or native coronary (n = 4) interventions. The mean age was 62 +/- 10 years. All four patients with native coronary lesions sustained acute myocardial infarction while 15/16 patients with degenerated SVGs presented with accelerated angina pectoris. The mean proximal reference diameter was 3.62 +/- 0.32 mm, percentage diameter stenosis was 72 +/- 13%, and lesion length was 16.3 +/- 5.7 mm. Angiographic visible thrombus was detected in 12/20 (60%) cases. Stents were used in 19/20 patients (95%) with average stent diameter/length equal to 3.81 +/- 0.42/23 +/- 7 mm. Overall procedural success was obtained in 93.3% as no-reflow and total CK elevation occurred in 1/16 treated patients (6.7%) despite distal embolic filtration. In-hospital and 30-day survival was 100% with no episodes of target vessel thrombosis and/or myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the FilterWire EX seems to be feasible and safe in suitable lesion subsets and in relatively large-sized vessels among patients who are at high risk for distal embolization.

Effect of Distal Embolization on Myocardial Perfusion Reserve After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background— Studies have shown that a subset of patients demonstrate persistent impairment in microcirculatory function after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Distal embolization of plaque contents has been postulated as the main mechanism for this. We sought to investigate this further by evaluating PCI-induced changes in myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) over time in segments with “distal-type” procedure-related myonecrosis using high-resolution quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Methods and Results— Forty patients undergoing PCI were studied with pre-PCI and 24-hour post-PCI delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging and first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging at rest and stress. Twenty patients underwent a third magnetic resonance imaging scan at 6 months. For perfusion imaging, 3 short-axis images were acquired during every heartbeat with a T1-weighted turboFLASH sequence. MPRI was calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to resting myocardial blood flow and subdivided according to the presence and location of new delayed hyperenhancement. Twenty-one patients demonstrated new distal hyperenhancement after PCI. Mean MPRI in revascularized myocardial segments not demonstrating new HE was significantly increased after the procedure (2.06 [95% CI, 1.99 to 2.13] before PCI and 2.52 [95% CI, 2.42 to 2.62] after PCI; P <0.001). In contrast, MPRI in segments with distal hyperenhancement was reduced after PCI (2.16 [95% CI, 1.95 to 2.37] before PCI; 2.00 [95% CI, 1.82 to 2.19] after PCI; mixed-model z =−4.82; P <0.001). Changes in mean MPRI 24 hours after PCI in segments upstream to new injury were not significantly different compared with perfusion changes in remote myocardium ( z =−0.68; P =0.50). At 6 months after the procedure, mean MPRI in segments with new injury improved significantly compared with MPRI measured in these segments at 24 hours after PCI.

Conclusions— MPRI is reduced in myocardial segments that demonstrate new distal irreversible injury at 24 hours after PCI. These reductions are confined to the segments with injury and do not affect the entire supply territory of the culprit vessel.

Percutaneous coronary intervention and the no-reflow phenomenon

No-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is observed most commonly during saphenous vein graft intervention, rotational atherectomy and primary PCI for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The contributions of distal embolization and ischemia/reperfusion injury to the pathogenesis of no-reflow vary in these settings, as does prevention and management. Prevention of no-reflow in these high-risk groups is the best treatment strategy, employing antiplatelet agents, vasodilators and/or mechanical devices to prevent distal embolization. Once mechanical factors are excluded as a cause for reduced epicardial flow, the treatment of established no-reflow is mainly pharmacologic, since the obstruction occurs at the level of the microvasculature. Compared with patients in whom no-reflow is transient, refractory no-reflow is associated with a markedly increased risk of 30-day mortality.

Prediction of distal embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention in saphenous vein grafts

Distal protection devices have been proved to decrease distal embolization and improve outcome in unselected patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). However, it remains uncertain whether distal protection is necessary in all patients. We investigated whether clinical or angiographic variables can predict distal embolization and, hence, need for a distal protection device. Fifty-eight consecutive SVGs that underwent PCI with a FilterWire distal protection device were studied. After the procedure, the FilterWire was fixed in formalin and photographed, and embolic debris area (square millimeters) was quantified by semi-automated edge-detection analysis. Debris area was correlated with 6 prespecified variables: clinical presentation, SVG age, reference lumen diameter, plaque volume, SVG degeneracy, and presence of a filling defect. Embolic debris was identified in 57 of 58 grafts (98%). Median debris area was 4.0 mm(2) (range 0.0 to 25.1). None of the prespecified variables predicted the occurrence of distal embolization or the amount of captured embolic debris. In conclusion, distal embolization during SVG PCI is universal. Embolic burden cannot be predicted by clinical or angiographic variables, and embolic protection should be used in all patients.

Protecting the Myocardial Cell During Coronary Revascularization

Background— Using the ischemic myocardial cell as a paradigm, competitive coronary revascularization technologies will be analyzed for their potential in causing additional myocardial cell damage during the course of therapeutic procedures.

Methods and Results— Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using balloon and/or stent (bare metal or coated) approaches may be associated with myonecrosis related to atherosclerotic debris plugging the downstream coronary microcirculation as well as ischemia/reperfusion injury associated with revascularization of occluded coronary vessels. The placement of distal mechanical devices and filters during the course of PCI has not been successful in ameliorating this problem. Coronary revascularization using coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) similarly may be associated with myocardial stunning and cell necrosis associated with ischemia/reperfusion injury. Surgically induced myocardial ischemia secondary to aortic cross clamping, results from the attenuation or cessation of coronary blood flow such that oxygen delivery to the myocardium is insufficient to meet basal myocardial requirements to preserve cellular membrane stability and viability. Recovery involves: (1) resumption of normal oxidative metabolism and the restoration of myocardial energy reserves; (2) reversal of ischemia induced cell swelling and loss of membrane ion gradients and the adenine nucleotide pool; (3) repair of damaged cell organelles such as the mitochondria and the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Despite meticulous adherence to presently known principles of surgical myocardial protection using advanced cardioplegic technologies, some patients require inotropic support and/or mechanical assist devices postoperatively, when none was required preoperatively.

Conclusions— Which method of coronary revascularization causes the least amount of myocardial cell injury and is associated with superior long-term outcomes remains an area of increasing controversy.

Low power ultrasound delivered through a PTCA-like guidewire: preclinical feasibility and safety of a novel technology for intracoronary thrombolysis

BACKGROUND

Low power ultrasound delivered through an angioplasty-like guidewire may be effective for intracoronary thrombolysis. We evaluated the preclinical feasibility and safety of such wire.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 15 anesthetized Yucatan minipigs, the ultrasonic wire was advanced percutaneously into all three coronaries. Each coronary was randomized to long activation (6 minutes), short activation (3 minutes), or control (3 minutes indwelling, no activation). The energy delivered was 0.14 +/- 0.01 W/cm of active length (20 kHz). No changes in heart rate, rhythm, or arterial pressure occurred during wire positioning or activation. Mean lumen diameter (MLD) by quantitative angiography was not significantly different pre- and postintervention (2.36 +/- 0.12 mm vs 2.36 +/- 0.11 mm for long activation, P = 0.96; 2.33 +/- 0.15 mm vs 2.34 +/- 0.14 mm for short activation, P = 0.54; 2.30 +/- 0.12 mm vs 2.33 +/- 0.12 mm for control, P = 0.21). There were no angiographic stenoses at 60 or 90 days follow-up. Compared with baseline, MLD at follow-up increased in all the three groups (2.40 +/- 0.13 mm vs 2.53 +/- 0.11 mm, P = 0.004 for long activation; 2.37 +/- 0.17 mm vs 2.52 +/- 0.14 mm, P = 0.023 for short activation; 2.20 +/- 0.12 mm vs 2.33 +/- 0.11 mm, P = 0.001 for the control group). By histology, there were no clinically significant pathologic changes in coronary morphology.

CONCLUSION

Use of a transverse cavitation therapeutic wire is feasible and well tolerated acutely in the normal porcine coronary. At 60 and 90 days, no angiographically apparent damage, no clinically significant pathologic changes, and no adverse events were seen. This technology may be safely used during percutaneous coronary intervention. Further studies are justified to evaluate its efficacy for intracoronary thrombus ablation.

FilterWire distal embolic protection device for vein graft stenting: initial single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention is associated with a significant incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) related to distal vessel embolization. The FilterWire distal embolic protection device has recently been approved as an adjunct to SVG intervention. We report here our initial experience in a single center in 30 consecutive patients using this device in SVG stenting.

HYPOTHESIS

This study examined the outcomes and complications associated with these devices, as well as whether proficiency with the devices increased with greater experience and whether there were measurable outcome differences between devices.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all patients in whom a FilterWire device was placed at our hospital between June 2001 and June 2004.

RESULTS

The device was successfully deployed in 29 of 30 patients, and all patients were stented successfully. Overall MACE rate was 6.6%, consistent with reports in larger multicenter clinical trials. Transient decreases in flow were noted while the device was in place in six patients, but improved in five patients with device removal.

CONCLUSIONS

This early experience in a single center using FilterWire embolic protection indicates that excellent clinical results can be obtained by the adoption of filter protection for SVG intervention, without evidence for a detrimental learning curve.

Pivotal, randomized U.S. study of the Symbiot™ covered stent system in patients with saphenous vein graft disease: Eight-month angiographic and clinical results from the Symbiot III trial

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and angiographic outcomes of the Symbiot ePTFE covered stent versus bare metal stents (BMS) for the treatment of saphenous vein graft (SVG) disease.

BACKGROUND

The Symbiot stent was developed to reduce periprocedural complications, by potentially preventing distal embolization, and to serve as a possible barrier to cell migration, thus reducing restenosis.

METHODS

Symbiot III is a prospective, randomized trial of 400 patients at 45 US sites, with 201 patients in the Symbiot group and 199 in the BMS group. Randomization was stratified based on the intended use of embolic protection devices and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The primary endpoint was percent diameter stenosis (%DS) as measured by quantitative coronary angiography at 8 months. Secondary endpoints included MACE (cardiac death, MI, TVR).

RESULTS

The groups were well matched for all baseline clinical and lesion characteristics. At 8 months, %DS was comparable between groups (30.9% Symbiot, 31.9% BMS, P = 0.80). Although the rates of binary restenosis in the stented segment were similar (29.1% Symbiot, 21.9% BMS, P = 0.17), more patients in the Symbiot group had binary restenosis at the proximal edge (9.0% Symbiot, 1.8% BMS, P = 0.0211). There was no difference in the incidence of MACE between groups (30.6% Symbiot, 26.6% BMS, P = 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

This study failed to show an advantage for the Symbiot stent in the treatment of degenerated SVGs. This PTFE covered stent does not appear to act as a barrier to prevent restenosis.

Distal Myocardial Protection During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The discrepancy between angiographic success and microvascular perfusion has been recognized for some time. In the face of an open artery, the degree of microvascular perfusion determines post-infarct prognosis. Despite successful epicardial recanalization, tissue perfusion may be absent in up to 25% patients with acute myocardial infarction. Historically associated with saphenous vein graft intervention, embolization is increasingly recognized in native coronary arteries, particularly in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). With more than two million PCI procedures performed worldwide each year, there is enormous interest in protecting the left ventricular myocardium from embolization during PCI. This article reviews the evidence for distal myocardial protection and discusses the relative merits of the different available techniques.

Eligibility for use of proximal or distal embolic protection devices during percutaneous intervention for acute myocardial infarction

Although there has been enthusiasm for using embolic protection devices in acute myocardial infarction, it is unclear how often these devices can be used in nonselected patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential eligibility for use of either proximal or distal embolic protection during primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention in a consecutive, nonselected population. We analyzed the angiograms of 259 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to determine eligibility for use of either type of protection device. Overall, 202 (78%) patients had anatomy suitable for embolic protection, including 154 (59%) who were eligible for proximal protection, 128 (49%) who were eligible for distal protection, and 80 (31%) who were eligible for both devices. Patients eligible for proximal protection were more likely to have a right coronary culprit, whereas patients eligible for distal protection were more likely to have a lesion in the left anterior descending coronary artery.

Distal embolization during primary angioplasty: histopathologic features and predictability

BACKGROUND

Distal embolization during primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) may affect myocardial reperfusion. We evaluated the prevalence and features of embolization during primary PCI and its relationship with clinical and angiographic variables.

METHODS

Forty-six consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent primary PCI with a filter-based distal protection device. Histopathologic analysis was performed on retrieved embolic fragments, assessing the presence and relative amount of fibrin, necrosis, lipid droplets, collagen, mucopolysaccharides, and leukocytes, as well as the total debris volume. Such variables were related to baseline clinical and angiographic variables.

RESULTS

Embolic material was recovered in 41 (89%) of 46 cases, with a mean total debris volume of 1.2 +/- 2.2 mm3. Prevalent histopathologic patterns were organized thrombus (47%), fresh thrombus (29%), and plaque fragments (24%). At multivariate analysis, none of the baseline clinical variables considered significantly predicted the total debris volume. Among angiographic variables, angiographic signs of high thrombus burden (cut-off coronary occlusion pattern or large intracoronary minus image) independently predicted the total debris volume at multivariate analysis (odds ratio 15.8, P < .005). Compared with its nonuse, abciximab did not affect the total number and the mean total volume of embolized material (15 +/- 16 vs 10 +/- 8 fragments, 1.5 +/- 2.5 vs 1.0 +/- 1.9 mm3, respectively, for both P > .20), or its qualitative composition.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal embolization occurs in most patients during primary PCI and mainly consists of plaque fragments and partially organized thrombi, which are likely to be scarcely responsive to antiplatelet drugs. Baseline angiographic signs of a high thrombus burden are the only significant predictors of the extent of distal embolization.

Early experience in the application of distal protection devices in treatment of peripheral vascular disease of the lower extremities

The objectives of this study were to reduce the risk of showering distal vessels with thromboemboli created during percutaneous interventions of the arteries in the lower extremities. Distal protection devices have been used in coronary and carotid interventions. Hence, using similar techniques, these filters and occlusion balloons were advanced past the targeted lesions and distally into femoral and popliteal arteries. Once opened, these devices allowed standard angioplasty and stent placement and captured the dislodged thromboemboli. Five cases were performed with the distal protection devices. One case used the distal occlusion balloon and four with the filter system. All five passed the lesion and were deployed. All five devices were retrieved without incident and were retrieved with substantial debris. There were no adverse events. The use of distal protection to treat high-risk or unstable lesions in the lower extremities shows great promise. Further case will be needed to evaluate the device for feasibility and safety.

Coronary no-reflow phenomenon

No-reflow occurs in up to one third of patients with acute myocardial infarction during acute percutaneous intervention, and occasionally during elective interventions, particularly vein graft intervention. Multiple intracoronary medications will restore flow in most cases. We begin with 100 to 1000 mg of nitroprusside, verapamil, or adenosine at a similar dosage. We give it at 100-mg increments at high velocity. We inject it distally in the epicardial artery to avoid any systemic effect, and we do it through an intracoronary perfusion catheter. At times, we use prophylactic injections (prior to balloon inflation), particularly in vein graft intervention. Most of these strategies are not formally approved for treating no-reflow. However, reversing this condition with restoration of normal coronary flow is essential for an improved left ventricular function and a better cardiac outcome.

Distal protection with a filter device during coronary stenting in patients with stable and unstable angina

BACKGROUND

Filter protection after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is now available to prevent distal embolization. The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate the microembolization phenomenon during procedures of stent implantation in native coronary arteries of patients with stable and unstable angina, (2) to assess the amount and characteristics of the debris captured by the Angioguard, and (3) to investigate the relation between clinical and angiographic variables and pathological data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Elective coronary stenting with the use of a protective filter was attempted in 39 consecutive coronary artery lesions with >60% stenosis (mean, 67.6+/-8.79%). Debris was present in 75.6% of the filters. Particle size ranged from 47.16 to 2503.48 microm (mean, 518.83+/-319.61 microm) in the major axis. Particles >300 microm were found in 24 of 28 filters with debris (85.7%), and particles >1000 microm were present in 10 of 28 filters (35.7%). Patients with unstable angina had greater particles (mean maximum longitudinal diameter, 1098.33+/-714.3 microm) than those with stable angina (412.91+/-453 microm; P<0.001). The presence of unstable angina (OR, 65; CI, 1.2 to 3420; P=0.03) and age >67 years (OR, 42; CI, 1 to 1698; P=0.04) were found to be the only independent predictors of embolic particle size.

CONCLUSIONS

By limiting embolization, protective devices may prevent a number of potentially unfavorable events, thereby improving outcome. Our data support the use of these devices, especially in lesions with higher embolic potential, such as those occurring in older patients and in those with unstable angina.

Rheolytic thrombectomy with distal filter embolic protection as adjunctive therapies to high-risk saphenous vein graft intervention

Percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein graft (SVG), especially those with heavy atherothrombotic load, presents high risk for distal embolization and no-reflow. Using the distal filters alone may occasionally be disadvantageous because of the large debris burden and the inability to assess the underlying culprit lesions and vessel size accurately. We present a case of intervention of an occluded SVG using a combination of rheolytic thrombectomy and distal filter embolic protection as a pretreatment before stenting. This strategy has the potential to reduce further the risk of no-reflow and to provide visualization for proper assessment of the underlying anatomy especially in clot-laden vessels.

Safety and feasibility of the use of a distal filter protection device in percutaneous revascularization of small coronary arteries

The FilterWire EX is one of the filter protection devices developed as alternatives to balloon occlusion system for percutaneous coronary intervention. Its use has been recommended in vessels between 3.5 and 5.5 mm in diameter and no data are available on its use in smaller vessels. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of using FilterWire EX in native coronary arteries smaller than 3.5 mm. We successfully deployed and retrieved the FilterWire EX in 49 coronary arteries with a mean vessel diameter of 2.62 +/- 0.45 mm at device deployment. Reversible vasospasm was observed in 24 (50%) vessels, coronary flow was temporarily reduced in 22 (44.9%), and distal embolization was noted in 2 (4%). There was no vessel dissection induced by the device. These data suggest that it is safe and feasible to use the FilterWire EX in small coronary arteries.

Mechanical prevention of distal embolization during primary angioplasty: safety, feasibility, and impact on myocardial reperfusion

BACKGROUND

Effective myocardial reperfusion after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be limited by distal embolization. We tested the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the FilterWire-Ex (FW), a distal embolic protection device, as an adjunct to primary PCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-three consecutive patients undergoing primary PCI with FW protection were compared with a matched control group treated by primary PCI alone. Successful FW positioning was obtained in 47 patients (89%) without complications. Histological analysis of the content of the last 13 filters showed multiple embolic debris in all cases. FW use was associated with lower postinterventional corrected TIMI frame count (22+/-14 versus 31+/-19; P=0.005) and higher occurrence of grade 3 myocardial blush (66% versus 36%; P=0.006) and early ST-segment elevation resolution (80% versus 54%; P=0.006). At multivariate analysis, FW use was the only independent predictor of early ST-segment elevation resolution and of grade 3 myocardial blush. FW patients showed lower peak creatine kinase-MB release (236+/-172 versus 333+/-219 ng/mL; P=0.013) and greater improvement at 30 days in left ventricular wall motion score index (-0.30+/-0.19 versus -0.18+/-0.26; P=0.008) and ejection fraction (+7+/-4% versus +4+/-7%; P=0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

FW use during primary PCI is feasible and safe. Distal embolization prevention appears to exert a beneficial effect on markers of myocardial reperfusion and on left ventricular function improvement at 30 days.