Prevention of premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery stents: A science advisory from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American College of Surgeons, and American Dental Association, with representation from the American College of Physicians

Perioperative Optimization and Management of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Patient: A Narrative Review on Updates in Anticoagulation, Hypertension and Diabetes Medications

PURPOSE

The preoperative management guidelines of surgical patients are constantly evolving as newer evidence-based research is published. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons need to be current with the increasingly more complex new drug therapies and updated national association(s) guidelines. This narrative review provides a synopsis with important reference tables for updated preoperative optimization guidelines for anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, antihypertensive management, and glycemic control in the preoperative period for the oral and maxillofacial surgery patient. It also includes the most current anesthesia guidelines on glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists.

METHODS

The search strategy utilized pubmed.gov to identify the most recent national society guidelines and review articles pertinent to perioperative anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, antihypertensive management, and glycemic control.

RESULTS

The search identified 75 articles from the American College of Surgeons, American Heart Association, American Society of Anesthesiologists, American College of Cardiologists, in addition to recent reviews discussing the standard of care for optimization of patients in the perioperative period.

CONCLUSION

Medical optimization prior to surgery is important for safe and efficient surgical practice and has been shown to improve overall mortality. This narrative review provides a summary of the current data with recommendations focusing on four key points.

Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction With Subsequent Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Single-Center Experience

Objective

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) post acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a severe clinical condition with a poor prognosis. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the rate of in-hospital mortality in patients with GIB post-AMI and to identify the potential risk factors of this situation.

Methods

In this single-center retrospective study, a total of 154 patients diagnosed with AMI who subsequently suffered GIB were enrolled from October 2013 to December 2021. Demographic, laboratory, and clinical data were collected. The in-hospital mortality was the outcome of interest. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the potential risk factors of in-hospital mortality.

Results

Among the 154 subjects included in the final analysis, the mean age was 65.58 ± 11.20 years, and 104 (67.53%) were males. GIB occurred in 11 patients after thrombolytic therapy, 50 patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 93 patients during drug conservative treatment. A total of 41 patients died in the hospital. The in-hospital mortality rate of the thrombolysis group, PCI group, and drug conservative treatment group was 27.27% (3/11), 28.00% (14/50), and 25.81% (24/93), respectively. There was no difference in the in-hospital mortality among the three groups. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the peak levels of TnI (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.12, P = 0.011), condition of cardiogenic shock after admission (OR 14.52, 95% CI 3.36–62.62, P < 0.001), and the use of the mechanical ventilator (OR 8.14, 95% CI 2.03–32.59, P = 0.003) were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

Regardless of the treatment strategy for AMI, once GIB occurred, the prognosis was poor. High in-hospital mortality in patients with GIB post-AMI was independently associated with the peak levels of TnI, condition of cardiogenic shock, and the use of a mechanical ventilator.

Management of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing elective invasive procedures. Proposals from the French Working Group on perioperative haemostasis (GIHP) and the French Study Group on thrombosis and haemostasis (GFHT). In collaboration with the French Society for Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR)

The French Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) and the French Study Group on Haemostasis and Thrombosis (GFHT) in collaboration with the French Society for Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR) drafted up-to-date proposals for the management of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing elective invasive procedures. The proposals were discussed and validated by a vote; all proposals but one could be assigned with a high strength. The management of antiplatelet therapy is based on their indication and the procedure. The risk of bleeding related to the procedure can be divided into high, moderate and low categories depending on the possibility of performing the procedure in patients receiving antiplatelet agents (none, monotherapy and dual antiplatelet therapy respectively). If discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy is indicated before the procedure, a last intake of aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor and prasugrel 3, 5, 5 and 7 days before surgery respectively is proposed. The thrombotic risk associated with discontinuation should be assessed according to each specific indication of antiplatelet therapy and is higher for patients receiving dual therapy for coronary artery disease (with further refinements based on a few well-accepted items) than for those receiving monotherapy for cardiovascular prevention, for secondary stroke prevention or for lower extremity arterial disease. These proposals also address the issue of the potential role of platelet functional tests and consider management of antiplatelet therapy for regional anaesthesia, including central neuraxial anaesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks, and for coronary artery surgery.

Antiplatelet agents in hemodialysis

Patients affected by cardiovascular disease (CVD) are treated with antiplatelet agents (AA) and/or anticoagulant drugs, which are fundamental in the management of stroke, coronary atherosclerotic disease, peripheral vascular disease and atrial fibrillation. CVD is the most important cause of death in chronic renal failure (CRF). Death rates from myocardial infarction (MI) and from all other cardiac causes exceed those for the general population. Incidence of MI in CRF is triple that in the general population. Moreover, mortality is seven- to eight-fold higher in patients requiring chronic hemodialysis compared to the general population, and approximately 40% of deaths in this population are attributable to coronary artery disease (CAD). For these reasons, AA are widely used in patients affected by CRF. Current data do not support a protective effect of antiplatelet administration in hemodialytic patients as primary prevention of cardiovascular mortality. Different results have been obtained concerning secondary prevention of CVD. The Cooperative Cardiovascular Project demonstrated that dialysis patients treated with aspirin following MI had a 43% lower mortality. Another study reported that the use of aspirin and beta-blockers following MI was associated with lower mortality in CRF patients. However, aspirin plus clopidogrel seems to increase the hemorrhagic risk without a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality and there are insufficient data to support the use of new AA drugs in hemodialytic patients. In conclusion, since CRF patients are one of the groups at highest risk for atherosclerotic events, it could be reasonable to use aspirin in HD patients. However, the bleeding risk in HD patients needs to be strongly evaluated, especially before starting dual AA treatment.

A New Generation of Antiplatelet, and Anticoagulant Medication and the Implications for the Dental Surgeon

The management of dental patients taking either antiplatelet medication, anticoagulant medication or both has been well established in the previous literature. Recently, new generations of drugs have emerged which are becoming increasingly common, including direct thrombin inhibitors, factor X inhibitors and a new class of oral thienopyridines. The implications of these drugs for the dental surgeon are not yet fully known. Awareness remains low and there is very little information available within the literature on safe use during surgery. This review paper aims to provide some guidance for dental practitioners performing invasive procedures. CPD/CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A new generation of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs have serious implications for patients undergoing surgery and their use is increasing.

Clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor? a practical guide to use of antiplatelet agents in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Aspirin is a cornerstone of therapy in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, dual antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of stent thrombosis and cardiovascular events compared with aspirin alone in the treatment of patients with ACS. Recently, there has been debate as to which antiplatelet agent should be added to aspirin in the ACS treatment regimen. This review summarizes the pharmacologic and clinical data comparing clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, and provides a practical guide to clinicians for determining which antiplatelet to use for patients with ACS.

Aspirin and platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: role in therapy and strategies to overcome resistance

Platelet activation and aggregation are key components in the cascade of events causing thrombosis following plaque rupture. Antiplatelet therapy is essential in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and for those requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is a well established antiplatelet therapy and is mandated for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events following ACS. In patients with ACS, the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin is more effective than aspirin alone. For patients undergoing PCI, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is warranted. Aspirin should be continued indefinitely after PCI. Pretreatment of patients with clopidogrel prior to PCI lowers the incidence of cardiovascular events, yet the optimum timing of drug administration and dose are still being investigated, as is the duration of therapy following PCI. Late-stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents has pushed the recommendation for duration of clopidogrel therapy up to 1 year and perhaps beyond, in patients without risks for bleeding. The concepts of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance are important clinical questions. No uniform definition exists for aspirin or clopidogrel resistance. Measurements of resistance are often highly variable and do not necessarily correlate with clinical resistance. Noncompliance remains the most prominent mode of resistance. Screening of selected patient populations for resistance or pharmacologic intervention of those patients termed 'resistant' warrants further study.

Bleeding risk and reversal strategies for old and new anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents

The most important adverse effect of antithrombotic treatment is the occurrence of bleeding. In the case of severe bleeding in a patient who uses anticoagulant agents or when a patient on anticoagulants needs to undergo an urgent invasive procedure, it may be useful to reverse anticoagulant treatment. Conventional anticoagulants such as vitamin K antagonists may be neutralized by administration of vitamin K or prothrombin complex concentrates, whereas heparin and heparin derivatives can be counteracted by protamine sulphate. The anti-hemostatic effect of aspirin and other antiplatelet strategies can be corrected by the administration of platelet concentrate and/or desmopressin, if needed. Recently, a new generation of anticoagulants with a greater specificity towards activated coagulation factors as well as new antiplatelet agents have been introduced and these drugs show promising results in clinical studies. A limitation of these new agents may be the lack of an appropriate strategy to reverse the effect if a bleeding event occurs, although experimental studies show hopeful results for some of these agents.

Clinical evidence of interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors

Clopidogrel is approved for reduction of atherothrombotic events in patients with cardiovascular (CV) and cerebrovascular disease. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel decreases the risk of major adverse cardiac events after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention, compared with aspirin alone. Due to concern about gastrointestinal bleeding in patients who are receiving clopidogrel and aspirin therapy, current guidelines recommend combined use of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) to decrease the risk of bleeding. Data from previous pharmacological studies have shown that PPIs, which are extensively metabolized by the cytochrome system, may decrease the ADP-induced platelet aggregation of clopidogrel. Results from retrospective cohort studies have shown a higher incidence of major CV events in patients receiving both clopidogrel and PPIs than in those without PPIs. However, other retrospective analyses of randomized clinical trials have not shown that the concomitant PPI administration is associated with increased CV events among clopidogrel users. These controversial results suggest that large specific studies are needed. This article reviews the metabolism of clopidogrel and PPIs, existing clinical data regarding the interaction between clopidogrel and PPIs, and tries to provide recommendations for health care professionals.

Two-year clinical outcomes after large coronary stent (4.0 mm) placement: comparison of bare-metal stent versus drug-eluting stent

BACKGROUND

The absolute benefit of drug-eluting stents (DES) in low-risk patients and lesions is not well established.

HYPOTHESIS

The long term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in a single coronary artery disease may not be affected by the type of stent.

METHODS

This study assessed and compared 2-year clinical outcomes of 304 consecutive patients (147 BMS patients and 157 DES patients) treated with a single coronary stent (4.0 mm) for single de novo large coronary artery disease in 3 referral cardiac centers. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiac events at 2 years after the index procedure.

RESULTS

The reference vessel diameter was similar in both groups (3.92 ± 0.29 mm in BMS vs 3.95 ± 0.24 mm in DES, P = 0.50). Late loss was larger in the BMS group (1.04 ± 0.83 mm vs 0.73 ± 0.91 mm in DES, P = 0.03). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events at the 2-year clinical follow-up was very low, 24 of 304 patients (7.9%), regardless of stent type deployed (7.5% in BMS vs 8.3% in DES, P = 0.83). The rate of target vessel revascularization was also similar in both groups (4.8% in BMS vs 5.7% in DES, P = 0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-year clinical outcomes after PCI with a single large coronary stent (4.0 mm) were excellent. The clinical outcomes were not affected by the type of stent used.

Safety and Efficacy of Clopidogrel before Surgery

Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet drug that is used in patients who have had previous cerebrovascular events, acute coronary syndromes, or who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with bare metal or drug-eluting stents. About 5% of patients who undergo PCI have to undergo non-cardiac surgery within 1 year of coronary stent implantation. Patients who receive clopidogrel may be at increased risk of bleeding complications during surgery. The risk of coronary thrombosis after non-cardiac surgery increases, especially when surgery is performed early after stenting, and particularly when antiplatelet agents are withdrawn before surgery. The decision to continue or withhold clopidogrel should reflect a balance of the consequences of perioperative hemorrhage versus the risk of perioperative vascular complications. Close communication among surgeons, anesthesiologists, and cardiologist is necessary to minimize both adverse cardiac risk and surgical risk in those patients.

[Warfarin combined with blood platelet inhibition]

Dual antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid and a thienopyridine) is essential after coronary stent implantation, and in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. Many patients also need oral anticoagulation. Unfortunately, there are no prospective randomised trials to guide therapy. Triple antithrombotic therapy with acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel and warfarin is most commonly used. This regimen can reduce the risk of thrombosis and thromboembolism, but is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Measures that reduce the risk of complications are reduction of INR with careful monitoring, a short duration of triple therapy (when possible) and use of radial access and a bare metal stent.

The significance of clopidogrel low-responsiveness on stent thrombosis and cardiac death assessed by the verifynow p(2)y(12) assay in patients with acute coronary syndrome within 6 months after drug-eluting stent implantation

Background and Objectives

Clopidogrel resistance or low-responsiveness may be associated with recurrent atherothrombotic events after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. We prospectively evaluated the association between clopidogrel resistance assessed by the Verifynow™ P₂Y₁₂ assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, CA, USA) and stent thrombosis (ST) or cardiac death (CD) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) within 6 months after DES implantation.

Subjects and Methods

We enrolled 237 consecutive patients (160 males, 65.2±10.3 years) with ACS who received a DES implantation. The composite endpoint was defined to CD or ST by Academic Research Consortium definitions within 6 months post-implantation. Clopidogrel resistance was defined as <20% inhibition of the P₂Y₁₂ receptor.

Results

Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between 142 normal individuals and 95 clopidogrel resistant patients. CD occurred in one case (0.7%) in the normal group and two cases (2.13%) in the resistant group (p=0.344). There was no episode of ST in the normal group and four episodes in the resistant group (4.2%, four definite ST) (p=0.035). Univariate logistic regression revealed an adjusted odds ratio (OR) for composite end point of CD or ST of 9.646 {95% confidence interval (CI) 1.139-81.679}, and multivariate logistic regression for composite end point revealed an OR of 12.074 (95% CI 1.205-120.992).

Conclusion

Clopidogrel low-responsiveness assessed by the Verifynow™ P₂Y₁₂ assay is an independent predictor of ST and composite end point of ST or CD in patients with ACS within 6 months after DES implantation.

Emergency reversal of antithrombotic treatment

The most important adverse effect of antithrombotic treatment is the occurrence of bleeding. In case of serious or even life-threatening bleeding in a patient who uses anticoagulant agents or when a patient on anticoagulants needs to undergo an urgent invasive procedure, anticoagulant treatment can be reversed by various specific strategies. Heparin and heparin derivatives can be counteracted by protamine sulphate, whereas the anticoagulant effect of vitamin K antagonists may be neutralized by administration of vitamin K or prothrombin complex concentrates. The anti-hemostatic effect of aspirin and other anti-platelet strategies can be corrected by the administration of platelet concentrate or desmopressin, if needed. Recently, a new generation of anticoagulants with a greater specificity towards activated coagulation factors has been introduced and most of these agents are presently being evaluated in clinical studies. The new generation anticoagulants include specific inhibitors of factor IIa, factor Xa (including pentasaccharides) and agents that interfere with tissue factor activity. A limitation of this new class of anticoagulants may be the lack of an appropriate strategy to reverse the effect if a bleeding event occurs, although in some cases the administration of recombinant factor VIIa may be an option.

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the risk of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding and the protective effect of concomitant anti-secretory drugs during dual antiplatelet therapy administered following implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) for coronary heart disease. Because proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are reported to decrease the platelet inhibitory effects of clopidogrel, we also assessed cardiovascular outcomes in patients taking thienopyridine derivatives with or without anti-secretory drug.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 243 patients, who underwent DES implantation between January 2006 and December 2007 and were receiving dual anti-platelet therapy post-surgery. The main outcome measurement was the presence of UGI bleeding. Cardiovascular outcomes were assessed by follow-up coronary angiography (CAG) findings. Data were collected from medical records.

RESULTS

Eight cases of UGI bleeding were observed during the follow-up period, none of whom were taking anti-secretory drugs. Among the 243 cases, 108 cases were taking anti-secretory drugs: a PPI (67 cases), and an H2 receptor antagonist (41 cases). No UGI bleeding was observed among patients who were taking concomitant anti-secretory drugs. The 1- and 2-year cumulative incidences of UGI bleeding among patients who were not taking anti-secretory drugs were 4.5% and 9.2%, respectively. When CAG findings were compared between patients not taking any anti-secretory drug, taking PPI, or taking H2RA, significantly more stenotic lesions of the coronary artery were observed in the PPI-treatment group.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant use of an anti-secretory agent was associated with a reduced risk of UGI bleeding. Use of PPI may be associated with an attenuation of the effect of dual antiplatelet therapy.

Safety and efficacy of the drug-eluting stent: a double-edged sword?

Like the introduction of bare metal stents (BMS), that of drug-eluting stents (DES) represented a quantum leap in the interventional cardiology community's ongoing efforts to conquer restenosis. However, recent concerns over late thrombosis (LT) have tempered the initial enthusiasm. Nonetheless, when compared with BMS, the slightly higher DES-LT is counterbalanced by the device's markedly lower incidence of restenosis, resulting in net equivalent rates of death, myocardial infarction, and overall major adverse cardiovascular events. This article summarizes for the noncardiology practitioner the benefits and risks of DES, as well as essentials of postprocedural care of the DES patient. We discuss the pathophysiology of stent thrombosis, pivotal DES trials, and adjunct antiplatelet pharmacology. In December 2006, the Food and Drug Administration convened an expert panel to review these devices. Their recommendations, as well as the joint statement from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, are outlined.

Antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents: duration, resistance, alternatives, and management of surgical patients

The routine off-label use of drug-eluting stents (DESs) has been associated with a higher prevalence of stent thrombosis in clinical practice than was suggested in US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) preapproval studies. Consequently, the early identification of patients at risk for stent thrombosis has become a major goal in cardiology. Although a number of factors may be involved in DES thrombosis, the biologic cascade begins with local platelet activation and culminates in platelet aggregation, the generation of coagulation factors, the formation of a fibrin network, and the creation of a stable occlusive thrombus. Current data show that the premature discontinuation of dual-antiplatelet therapy is an important risk factor for DES thrombosis, but the occurrence of stent thrombosis in patients adhering to this drug regimen suggests that some patients are nonresponsive to clopidogrel therapy, primarily because of functional and genetic variability in the cytochrome P450 enzymes. Patients with high platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) during dual-antiplatelet therapy may be at increased risk for adverse ischemic events, including stent thrombosis. Using a point-of-service assay, Price et al measured platelet function in patients treated with DESs and demonstrated that 75% of patients who developed stent thrombosis were in the lowest quartile of platelet inhibition and the highest quartile of platelet reactivity. Data from the authors' center suggest that there may be a threshold of platelet reactivity, as measured by light-transmittance aggregometry after ADP stimulation, that predicts an increased risk for stent thrombosis. Large prospective studies designed to identify which patients are at risk for stent thrombosis on the basis of platelet function testing are under way and may eventually lead to personalized antithrombotic therapy.