Bilateral erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain relief in lumbar spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant updated systematic review & meta-analysis

Study design

Systematic review.

Objective

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is growing in popularity over the recent past as an adjuvant modality in multimodal analgesic management following lumbar spine surgery (LSS). The current updated meta-analysis was performed to analyze the efficacy of ESPB for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing LSS.

Methods

We conducted independent and duplicate electronic database searches including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library till June 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) analyzing the efficacy of bilateral ESPB for postoperative pain relief in lumbar spine surgeries. Post-operative pain scores, total analgesic consumption, first analgesic requirement time, length of stay and complications were the outcomes evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 17 software.

Results

32 RCTs including 1464 patients (ESPB/Control = 1077/1069) were included in the analysis. There was a significant pain relief in ESPB group, as compared to placebo across all timelines such as during immediate post-operative period (p < 0.001), 4 h (p < 0.001), 8 h (p < 0.001), 12 h (p < 0.001), 24 h (p = 0.001) post-surgery. Similarly, ESPB group showed a significant reduction in analgesic requirement at 8 h (p < 0.001), 12 h (p = 0.001), and 24 h (p < 0.001). However, no difference was noted in the first analgesic requirement time, time to ambulate or total length of stay in the hospital. ESPB demonstrated significantly improved overall satisfaction score for the analgesic management (p < 0.001), reduced intensive care stay (p < 0.05) with significantly reduced post-operative nausea and vomiting (p < 0.001) compared to controls.

Conclusion

ESPB offers prolonged post-operative pain relief compared to controls, thereby reducing the need for opioid consumption and its related complications.

A Comparative study between single injection (corner pocket approach) and double injection costoclavicular block: A randomized parallel arm, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that ultrasound guided costoclavicular block may require a double shot to provide adequate, rapid sensory and motor blockade. In this trial, we hypothesized that if the corner pocket approach (between axillary artery and median cord) is used instead of the central approach (at the midpoint of the 3 cords) when performing single-shot costoclavicular block, the onset of blockade would be non-inferior to the double-shot technique.

METHOD

Ninety patients undergoing upper limb surgery were randomized to 2 groups for ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block (CCB) at a tertiary hospital. One group received ultrasound guided single-shot CCB using the corner pocket approach and other received ultrasound guided double-shot - the first shot at the centre of the 3 cords and the second between the axillary artery and the median cord. An observer blinded to group assignment recorded blockade onset time (defined as the time required to achieve a minimal sensorimotor composite score of 14 out of 16 points).

RESULTS

Of the 101 patients assessed for eligibility, 90 were recruited over period of 1 year (February 2022 to January 2023), with 45 in each group. Onset time was 22.1 ± 3.1 min in the single-shot group and 22.4 ± 2.9 min in the double-shot group. This difference was insignificant (p = 0.3).

CONCLUSION

Time to onset of blockade and full anaesthesia are similar in single-shot corner pocket CCB vs double-shot CCB. Further studies are required to determine the minimum effective volume of local anaesthetic required for the described technique.

'I've just got to take that risk and have faith . . .': The challenge of gaining and maintaining trust in patients undergoing knee surgery with a regional anaesthetic

Traditionally, the focus of the operating theatre has been on conducting safe, efficient surgery with unconscious patients. However, the care of awake patients is now a prominent feature of modern perioperative practise as the volume of surgery performed under regional anaesthesia increases. The aim of this novel study was to understand the experience of being a conscious patient during regional anaesthesia and knee surgery in the perioperative environment. Data were gathered through observation and ethnographic interview and analysis followed a constant comparative grounded theory approach. The concepts of Trust and Faith are identified as recurrent themes highlighted in the data. This article identifies the need to understand patients' expectations regarding the clinical encounter and how subsequent treatment will develop, so that, reasons for any deviation can be discussed openly and an explanation provided. Each clinical encounter takes place within a relationship based upon an uneven distribution of power, enacted through the interaction itself, with the health care professional in a dominant role. It is the responsibility of health care staff to recognise and negate this power imbalance and reinforce trusting relationships so information and treatment options are not presented as a 'fait accompli' but negotiated through jargon free easy to understand language.

Regional anaesthesia for postoperative pain management following laparoscopic, visceral, non-oncological surgery a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain management following laparoscopic, non-oncological visceral surgery in adults is challenging. Regional anaesthesia could be a promising component in multimodal pain management.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with GRADE assessment. Primary outcomes were postoperative acute pain intensity at rest/during movement after 24 h, the number of patients with block-related adverse events and the number of patients with postoperative paralytic ileus.

RESULTS

82 trials were included. Peripheral regional anaesthesia combined with general anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia may result in a slight reduction of pain intensity at rest at 24 h (mean difference (MD) - 0.72 points; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.91 to - 0.54; I2 = 97%; low-certainty evidence), which was not clinically relevant. The evidence is very uncertain regarding the effect on pain intensity during activity at 24 h (MD -0.8 points; 95%CI - 1.17 to - 0.42; I2 = 99%; very low-certainty evidence) and on the incidence of block-related adverse events. In contrast, neuraxial regional analgesia combined with general anaesthesia (versus general anaesthesia) may reduce postoperative pain intensity at rest in a clinical relevant matter (MD - 1.19 points; 95%CI - 1.99 to - 0.39; I2 = 97%; low-certainty evidence), but the effect is uncertain during activity (MD - 1.13 points; 95%CI - 2.31 to 0.06; I2 = 95%; very low-certainty evidence). There is uncertain evidence, that neuraxial regional analgesia combined with general anaesthesia (versus general anaesthesia) increases the risk for block-related adverse events (relative risk (RR) 5.11; 95%CI 1.13 to 23.03; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirms that regional anaesthesia might be an important part of multimodal postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic visceral surgery, e.g. in patients at risk for severe postoperative pain, and with large differences between surgical procedures and settings. Further research is required to evaluate the use of adjuvants and the additional benefit of regional anaesthesia in ERAS programmes.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021258281.

The efficacy and safety of ankle blocks for foot and ankle surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve blocks may be essential elements in a multimodal pain management regime following foot and ankle surgery. We assessed the effects of ankle blocks compared with no intervention/sham block or a sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle.

METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, Medline, and Embase for randomised clinical trials comparing ankle block with no intervention/sham block or a sciatic nerve block for patients undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle. Our primary outcomes were duration of analgesia and cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption. We followed the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook, and performed meta-analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA), and assessed the risk of bias and certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

We included five trials (362 participants) comparing ankle block with no intervention/sham block and three trials (247 participants) comparing ankle block with a sciatic nerve block. Ankle block may increase the duration of analgesia when compared with no intervention/sham block (MD 431 min; 96.7% CI 208 to 654), but the evidence was very uncertain. Duration was decreased when compared with a sciatic nerve block (MD -410 min; 96.7% CI -462 to -358). The ankle block duration was probably important in both comparisons. The effects on cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption were very uncertain in both comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Ankle block may increase the duration of analgesia when compared with no intervention/sham block, but the evidence was very uncertain, and decrease the duration of analgesia when compared with a sciatic nerve block. The ankle block duration was probably clinically important in both comparisons. The effects on cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption were very uncertain.

Nerve block efficacy in breast augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Breast augmentation is often performed as a day-case general anaesthetic operation, with postoperative, opioid-based analgesia regimens. However, it may also be performed using regional anaesthesia; a variety of nerve block techniques are available to reduce postoperative pain and analgesic requirements. This systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines comparing breast augmentation using regional anaesthesia with general anaesthesia, versus general anaesthesia alone or with local field infiltration. All randomised or quasi-randomised studies that recruited adult female patients undergoing breast augmentation using regional anaesthesia were considered. The primary outcome measures were postoperative pain and analgesic requirements. A randomised effects model was used, with standardised mean difference or mean difference outcomes used as appropriate. Thirteen studies were included for systematic review, out of which eight met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Nerve blocks had statistically significant standardised mean difference reductions in postoperative pain scores across all time points: 0 h (-1.2 [-2.1 to -0.3], p = 0.01, I2 = 85%), 1 h (-1.3 [-2.1 to -0.5], p = 0.002, I2 = 89%), 2 h (-1.8 [-2.8 to -0.9], p = 0.0002, I2 = 88%), 4-6 h (-1.2 [-2.1 to -0.4], p = 0.006, I2 = 89%), 24 h (-1.4 [-2.5 to -0.2], p = 0.02, I2 = 94%). There was also a statistically significant reduction in postoperative opioid requirements: -150 mcg fentanyl (-259.2 to -40.9), p = 0.007. Although an element of study heterogeneity is noted, this systematic review and meta-analysis support the concept that regional anaesthesia using nerve blocks in breast augmentation surgery, reduces both postoperative pain and opioid requirements, compared with general anaesthesia.

Effects of two different topographic approaches for combined sciatic and femoral nerve block in calves, guided by ultrasound and neurostimulation

To evaluate the sensory and motor effects promoted by a combined sciatic and femoral nerve block in calves using two approaches. Six calves were used, in a crossover study. Ultrasound combined with neurostimulation, was used to perform the following block combinations: the proximal approach (PA), which consisted of the association of the parasacral approach (sciatic nerve block) and ventral to the ilium approach (femoral nerve block); distal approach (DA) consisted of the association of a lateral approach to the pelvic limb approach (sciatic nerve block), and an inguinal approach, underneath the femoral trigone (femoral nerve block). Pressure algometry and motor function of the limb where evaluated. Mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) increase, and ataxia duration means were 9.5 ± 0.7 kg and 10.4 ± 3.9 hr for PA and 10.4 ± 3.9 kg and 12.7 ± 1.9 hr for DA, respectively with no significant difference. There was no significant difference between MNT elevation time and the duration of ataxia using the same approach. The DA treatment showed significant MNT elevation in 72% of the tested regions, while the PA treatment showed an elevation in 100% regions tested. Topographic approaches closer to where the spinal nerves emerge produced a larger desensitised area.

Watching a movie or listening to music is effective in managing perioperative anxiety and pain: a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

Despite the use of perioperative anxiolytics and pain medication, surgery can be a stressful and painful experience. Providing patients with distractions using video and/or audio tools in addition to medication may be helpful. To date, no studies have compared different distraction modalities in a same-day surgical setting in adults. This study aims to determine whether audio-visual distraction with video glasses (AVD) is more effective in reducing anxiety and pain compared to audio distraction (AD) in conscious patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. It was hypothesised that AVD, being the more immersive modality, would be more effective than AD on the outcome parameters.

METHODS

Fifty patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery with local and/or regional anaesthesia in a clinical day-care setting were randomly assigned to receive either fixed-scenery AVD or patient-choice AD with music. Primary outcome was anxiety, as measured by the Dutch version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 (STAI-6) prior to and 15 min after the intervention. Secondary outcomes were pain (Numeric Rating Scale Pain [NRS-P]), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Within each group, there was a significant reduction in anxiety (p = 0.028 for AVD, p < 0.001 for AD). In contrast to our hypothesis, listening to music without watching a video (AD group) reduced anxiety significantly more than experiencing full AVD (p = 0.018). The mean pain score did not change significantly within either user group, nor did pain scores differ between user groups.

CONCLUSION

In conscious patients undergoing surgery, watching a movie (using video glasses and a headphone set) and listening to music (using only a headphone set) are able to significantly reduce anxiety. AVD, although believed to provide higher levels of distraction, did not prove to be superior to AD. The clinical relevance of this study highlights the potential benefits of AVD or AD modalities in improving the surgical experience for conscious patients. Further research is required to examine the influence of freedom of choice in content on the aforementioned outcomes. To estimate the true value of higher immersion levels, different distraction modalities (e.g. AVD versus virtual reality) featuring the exact same scenery or content need to be compared.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Anesthesia management in a patient with Churg-Strauss syndrome in the ambulatory setting: A case report

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), also known as Churg-Strauss syndrome, is a rare type of vasculitis with multisystemic involvement. Very few authors have described the anaesthesia technique in these patients. We present the first report on ambulatory surgery in a patient with EGPA. This case dispels concerns about the safety of day surgery and reports successful regional anaesthesia management in a patient with EGPA.

Inadequate neuraxial anaesthesia during caesarean delivery: a survey of practitioners

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine the knowledge, training, practices and attitudes of obstetric anaesthetic practitioners with regard to failed neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean delivery.

METHOD

We performed a contemporaneous and representative survey in an innovative fashion. We conducted an international cross-sectional study of obstetric anaesthetic practitioners at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association (OAA 2021). Validated survey questions were collected in real time using an audience response system.

RESULTS

Of the 426 participants who logged into the survey system, 356 provided responses (4173 responses to 13 questions, across all grades/seniority of practitioner). The number of responses to questions ranged from 81% to 61%. Survey responses suggest that it is routine for respondents to inform patients about the difference between pain and expected intra-operative sensations, (320/327, 97.9%) but less routine to inform patients of the risk of intra-operative pain (204/260, 78.5%), or the possibility of conversion to general anaesthesia. (290/309 93.8%). Only 30% of respondents reported the use of written guidelines for follow-up of patients who experience intra-operative pain under neuraxial anaesthesia, and only 23% reported formal training in management of intra-operative pain under neuraxial anaesthesia. Respondents felt that inadequate block duration, prolonged surgery, and patient anxiety were contributory factors to failed anaesthesia, and the contributory factors differed between grade/seniority of practitioner. Modalities used to test a block were cold, motor block and light touch, with approximately 65% of respondents routinely using three modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study survey found that the consent process may not always be adequately comprehensive, and that standardised documentation and testing of the block and focused training may be beneficial to prevent patient dissatisfaction and the chance of litigation.

Anatomical landmarks for ankle block

We aimed to describe anatomical landmarks to accurately locate the five nerves that are infiltrated to accomplish anaesthesia of the foot in an ankle block. Twenty-four formaldehyde-fixed cadaveric ankles were studied. Photographs of cross sections of the frozen legs, cut at a horizontal plane across the most prominent points of the medial and lateral malleoli, were analysed. The curvilinear distance from the most prominent point of the closest malleolus to each of the five cutaneous nerves and their depth from the skin surface were measured. Sural, tibial, deep peroneal, saphenous and medial dorsal cutaneous nerves were located 5.2 ± 1.3, 9.2 ± 2.4, 7.4 ± 1.9, 2.8 ± 1.1, 2.1 ± 0.6 mm deep to the skin surface. The curvilinear distances from the medial malleolus to the tibial, deep peroneal and saphenous nerves were 32.5 ± 8.9, 62.8 ± 11.1 and 24.4 ± 7.9 mm, respectively. The curvilinear distances from the lateral malleolus to the sural and medial dorsal cutaneous branches of superficial peroneal nerves were 27.9 ± 6.3 and 52.7 ± 7.3 mm, respectively. The deep peroneal nerve was found between the tendons of the extensor hallucis longus and the extensor digitorum longus in the majority of specimens, while the medial dorsal cutaneous nerve was almost exclusively found on the extensor digitorum longus tendon. The sural and tibial nerves were located around halfway between the most prominent point of the relevant malleolus and the posterior border of the Achilles tendon. In conclusion, this study describes easily identifiable, palpable bony and soft tissue landmarks that could be used to locate the nerves around the ankle.

Pre-operative erector spinae plane block should be considered a viable option for laparoscopic colectomies

BACKGROUND

The Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block is a recent development in the field of regional anaesthesia and has been increasingly explored for abdominal surgeries to reduce opioid use and improve pain control. Colorectal cancer is the commonest cancer in multi-ethnic Singapore and requires surgery for curative treatment. ESP is a promising alternative in colorectal surgeries, but few studies have evaluated its efficacy in such surgeries. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the use of ESP blocks in laparoscopic colorectal surgeries to establish its safety and efficacy in this field.

METHODS

A prospective two-armed interventional cohort study comparing T8-T10 ESP blocks with conventional multimodal intravenous analgesia for laparoscopic colectomies was conducted in a single institution in Singapore. The decision for doing an ESP block versus conventional multimodal intravenous analgesia was made by a consensus between the attending surgeon and anesthesiologist. Outcomes measured were total intra-operative opioid consumption, post-operative pain control and patient outcome. Post-operative pain control was measured by pain score, analgesia use, and amount of opioids consumed. Patient outcome was determined by presence of ileus.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients were included, of which 30 patients received an ESP block. Overall, the ESP group had a significantly lower median opioid usage both intra-operatively and post-operatively (p = 0.031). Fewer patients required patient-controlled analgesia and rescue analgesia post-operatively for pain control (p < 0.001) amongst the ESP group. Pain scores were similar and post-operative ileus was absent in both groups. Multivariate analysis found that the ESP block had an independent effect on reducing intra-opioid consumption (p = 0.014). Multivariate analysis of post-operative opioid use and pain scores did not yield statistically significant results.

CONCLUSIONS

The ESP block was an effective alternative regional anaesthesia for colorectal surgery that reduced intra-operative and post-operative opioid use while attaining satisfactory pain control.

Ultrasound-guided sciatic popliteal block performed at the Emergency Department in a patient with a scorpion bite and severe pain

We report the case of a paediatric patient who presented at the Emergency Department with severe pain in the right lower extremity caused by a scorpion sting. Analgesics were ineffective, so we decided to perform an ultrasound-guided popliteal block, which provided complete analgesia and allowed the patient to be followed up in the outpatient department, with no adverse effects. The sting of the species of scorpion found in Spain is not dangerous to human life; however, it causes self-limiting localised pain that lasts for 24-48h, and can be severe. The first-line treatment is effective analgesia. Regional anaesthesia techniques are useful in the control of acute pain, and are an example of effective collaboration between the Anaesthesiology and Emergency services.

Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block versus Bier block for emergency reduction of upper limb injuries: a protocol for an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Closed reduction of upper limb fractures and/or dislocations are common in the emergency department (ED), which involves physically re-aligning the injured part prior to immobilisation. As this is painful, numerous techniques are available to provide regional anaesthesia to ensure patient tolerance. A Bier block (BB) is typically performed as part of routine care. An alternative technique gaining interest in the ED is ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block (UGSCB), which involves injecting local anaesthetic around the brachial plexus at the supraclavicular fossa under ultrasound guidance. It is unclear whether UGSCB is effective and safe when performed in the ED.

METHODS

SUPERB (SUPraclavicular block for Emergency Reduction versus Bier block) is a prospective open-label, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial that compares the effectiveness of UGSCB versus BB for closed reduction of upper limb fractures and/or dislocations. Adult patients presenting with an upper limb fracture and/or dislocation that requires emergent closed reduction in the ED will be eligible. After screening, participants will be randomised to either UGSCB or BB. Once regional anaesthesia is obtained, closed reduction of the injured part will be performed and appropriately immobilised. The primary outcome is maximal pain experienced during closed reduction measured via a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include baseline and post-reduction pain, patient satisfaction, total opioid requirement in ED, ED length of stay, adverse events and regional anaesthesia failure.

DISCUSSION

Existing evidence suggests UGSCB is effective when performed in the operating theatre by trained anaesthetists. SUPERB will be the first randomised controlled trial to elucidate the effectiveness and safety of UGSCB in the ED. The findings have the potential to provide an alternative safe and effective option for the management of upper extremity emergencies in the ED.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial has been registered on 21 October 2022 with Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622001356752).

Erector spinae plane block for perioperative pain management in neurosurgical lower-thoracic and lumbar spinal fusion: a single-centre prospective randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Erector spinae plane block is a locoregional anaesthetic technique widely used in several different surgeries due to its safety and efficacy. The aim of this study is to assess its utility in spinal degenerative and traumatic surgery in western countries and for patients of Caucasian ethnicity.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective lower-thoracic and lumbar spinal fusion were randomised into two groups: the case group (n = 15) who received erector spinae plane block (ropivacaine 0.4% + dexamethasone 4 mg, 20 mL per side at the level of surgery) plus postoperative opioid analgesia, and the control group (n = 15) who received opioid-based analgesia.

RESULTS

The erector spinae plane block group showed significantly lower morphine consumption at 48 h postoperatively, lower need for intraoperative fentanyl (203.3 ± 121.7 micrograms vs. 322.0 ± 148.2 micrograms, p-value = 0.021), lower NRS score at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36 h, and higher satisfaction rates of patients (8.4 ± 1.2 vs. 6.0 ± 1.05, p-value < 0.0001). No differences in the duration of the hospitalisation were observed. No erector spinae plane block-related complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Erector spinae plane block is a safe and efficient opioid-sparing technique for postoperative pain control after spinal fusion surgery. This study recommends its implementation in everyday practice and incorporation as a part of multimodal analgesia protocols.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was approved by the local ethical committee of Romagna (CEROM) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04729049). It also adheres to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and the CONSORT 2010 guidelines.

Awake laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most widely practiced surgical procedures in abdominal surgery. Patients undergo LC during general anaesthesia; however, in recent years, several studies have suggested the ability to perform LC in patients who are awake. We report a case of awake LC and a literature review.

CASE SUMMARY

A 69-year-old patient with severe pulmonary disease affected by cholelithiasis was scheduled for LC under regional anaesthesia. We first performed peridural anaesthesia at the T8-T9 level and then spinal anaesthesia at the T12-L1 level. The procedure was managed in total comfort for both the patient and the surgeon. The intra-abdominal pressure was 8 mmHg. The patient remained stable throughout the procedure, and the postoperative course was uneventful.

CONCLUSION

Evidence has warranted the safe use of spinal and epidural anaesthesia, with minimal side effects easily managed with medications. Regional anaesthesia in selected patients may provide some advantages over general anaesthesia, such as no airway manipulation, maintenance of spontaneous breathing, effective postoperative analgesia, less nausea and vomiting, and early recovery. However, this technique for LC is not widely used in Europe; this is the first case reported in Italy in the literature. Regional anaesthesia is feasible and safe in performing some types of laparoscopic procedures. Further studies should be carried out to introduce this type of anaesthesia in routine clinical practice.

The importance of perioperative optimisation to facilitate safe regional anaesthesia and their improved outcomes in fracture neck of femur patients

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are common presentations to orthopaedic departments, and their surgical management often results in blood transfusions. Compared with general anaesthesia, regional anaesthesia reduces the need for transfusions and mortality in the wider surgical population.

AIMS

In hip fracture patients, our primary outcome measure was to examine any relationship between anaesthetic modality and transfusion rates. The secondary outcome measure was to assess the relationship between anaesthetic modality and one-year mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 280 patients was carried out in 2017 and 2018. Data were collected from patient records, local transfusion laboratory and the national hip fracture database.

RESULTS

A total of 59.6% had regional and 40.4% general anaesthesia. Regional anaesthesia patients were younger with fewer comorbidities (p < .05). About 19.8% regional and 34.5% general anaesthesia patients received transfusions (odds ratio (OR) = 0.47, p < .05); 13.6% were taking anticoagulants and were less likely to receive a regional anaesthetic (31.6% versus 64%, OR = 0.26, p < .05). One-year mortality was 27% for regional and 37% for general anaesthetic patients (OR = 0.64, p = .09).

CONCLUSION

Regional anaesthesia halved the risk of blood transfusion. Anticoagulated patients were 74% less likely to receive regional anaesthetics, but had no additional transfusion risk. With optimisation, a larger proportion of patients could have regional anaesthesia.

Efficacy of a TAP block versus an anterior QLB for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Both the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and the anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) have been shown effective in reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Our hypothesis was that there is no difference in analgesic effect between the two blocks for this procedure.

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled study, 60 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair were equally randomly assigned to either a preoperative TAP block or an anterior QLB. The primary outcome was oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption at 4 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were OME consumption at 24, 48 h and 7 days, pain scores at rest and when coughing, nausea, and level of sedation measured at 1, 2, 3, 24, and 48 h and 7 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients completed the study. There was no significant difference in OME consumption at 4 h postoperatively, TAP group (10.3 ± 7.85 mg) (mean ± SD) versus the anterior QLB group (10.9 ± 10.85 mg) (p = .713). The pain scores were similar at rest and when coughing during the 7 day observation period, as were the level of sedation and incidence of nausea. There were no cases of serious side-effects or muscle weakness of the thigh on the same side as the block.

CONCLUSION

There is no difference in OME consumption, pain, nausea or sedation between the TAP and the anterior QLB. Thus, the choice between the two blocks in a clinical setting of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair should be based on other aspects, such as skills, practicalities, and potential risks.

Role of adjuvants in regional anesthesia: A systematic review

The combination of drugs and routes of administration produces a synergistic effect, and one of the most important components of multimodal analgesic strategies are, therefore, nerve blocks for pain management. The effect of a local anaesthetic can be prolonged by administering an adjuvant. In this systematic review, we included studies on adjuvants associated with local anaesthetics in peripheral nerve blocks published in the last 5 years in order to evaluate their effectiveness. The results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. The 79 studies selected using our criteria showed a clear prevalence of dexamethasone (n=24) and dexmedetomidine (n=33) over other adjuvants. Different meta-analyses comparing adjuvants suggest that dexamethasone administered perineurally achieves superior blockade with fewer side effects than dexmedetomidine. Based on the studies reviewed, we found moderate evidence to recommend the use of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to peripheral regional anaesthesia in surgeries that can cause moderate to severe pain.

Comparison of postoperative IL-6 and IL-10 levels following Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and classical Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane (TLIP) block in a posterior lumbar decompression and stabilization procedure: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and classical thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block can reduce postoperative pain in lumbar surgery. In this study, we compared the efficacy of ESPB and classical TLIP block in providing perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar posterior decompression and stabilization by comparing postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and IL-6 and IL-10 serum concentrations between ESPB and classical TLIP block.

METHOD

This was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial in tertiary referral hospitals. Forty patients were randomized into two equal groups, each receiving either ESPB or classical TLIP block. The primary outcome was the difference in IL-6 and IL-10 serum concentrations at baseline and 6 h after lumbar posterior decompression and stabilization. The secondary outcome was total opioid consumption and pain score 24 h post-operatively.

RESULT

There were no significant differences between the ESPB and classical TLIP block groups in pain score, IL-6 and IL-10 concentration change, and total opioid consumption post-operatively. There was a significant difference in the time until the first dose of morphine was needed between the ESPB and classical TLIP block groups (300 min vs. 547.5 min; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

ESPB and classical TLIP block performance during lumbar surgery have comparable pain scores, IL-6 and IL-10 concentration differences pre- and post-operation, and total opioid consumption post-operatively. However, classical TLIP block provides a prolonged duration of analgesia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04951024.

ProDeM: A Process-Oriented Delphi Method for systematic asynchronous and consensual surgical process modelling

Surgical process models support improving healthcare provision by facilitating communication and reasoning about processes in the medical domain. Modelling surgical processes is challenging as it requires integrating information that might be fragmented, scattered, and not process-oriented. These challenges can be faced by involving healthcare domain experts during process modelling. This paper presents ProDeM: a novel Process-Oriented Delphi Method for the systematic, asynchronous, and consensual modelling of surgical processes. ProDeM is an adaptable and flexible method that acknowledges that: (i) domain experts have busy calendars and might be geographically dispersed, and (ii) various elements of the process model need to be assessed to ensure model quality. The contribution of the paper is twofold as it outlines ProDeM, but also demonstrates its operationalisation in the context of a well-known surgical process. Besides showing the method's feasibility in practice, we also present an evaluation of the method by the experts involved in the demonstration.

Dementia risk after major elective surgery based on the route of anaesthesia: A propensity score-matched population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Whether the route of anaesthesia is an independent risk factor for dementia remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a propensity score-matched (PSM) population-based cohort study to compare dementia incidence among surgical patients undergoing different routes of anaesthesia.

METHODS

The inclusion criteria were being an inpatient >20 years of age who underwent major elective surgery, defined as those requiring GA without or with inhalation anaesthetics or regional anaesthesia, and being hospitalised for >1 day between Jan 1, 2008 and Dec 31, 2019 in Taiwan. Patients undergoing major elective surgery were categorised into three groups according to the type of anaesthesia administered: noninhalation anaesthesia, inhalation anaesthesia, and regional anaesthesia, matched at a 1:1 ratio. The incidence rate (IR) of dementia was determined.

FINDINGS

PSM yielded 63,750 patients (21,250 in the noninhalation anaesthesia group, 21,250 in the inhalation anaesthesia group, and 21,250 in the regional anaesthesia group). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs; 95% confidence intervals) of dementia for the inhalation and noninhalation anaesthesia groups compared with the regional anaesthesia group were 20.16 (15.40-26.35; p < 0.001) and 18.33 (14.03-24.04; p < 0.001), respectively. The aHR of dementia for inhalation anaesthesia compared with noninhalation anaesthesia was 1.13 (1.03-1.22; p = 0.028). The IRs of dementia for the inhalation, noninhalation, and regional anaesthesia groups were 3647.90, 3492.00, and 272.99 per 100,000 person-years, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

In this population based cohort study, the incidence of dementia among surgical patients undergoing general anaesthesia was higher than among those undergoing regional anaesthesia. Among patients undergoing general anaesthesia, inhalation anaesthesia was associated with a higher risk of dementia than noninhalation anaesthesia. Our results should be confirmed in a randomised controlled trial.

FUNDING

The study was partially supported by Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital (Funding Number: 10908, 10909, 11001, 11002, 11003, 11006, and 11013).

Circular External Fixator Removal in the Outpatient Clinic Using Regional Anaesthesia: A Pilot Study of a Novel Approach

Introduction

External fixator (EF) devices are commonly used in the management of complex skeletal trauma, as well as in elective limb reconstruction surgery for the management of congenital and acquired pathology. The subsequent removal of an EF is commonly performed under general anaesthesia in an operating theatre. This practice is resource-intensive and limits the amount of time available for other surgical cases in the operating theatre. We aimed to assess the use of regional anaesthesia as an alternative method of analgesia to facilitate the EF removal in an outpatient setting.

Design and methods

This prospective case series evaluated the first 50 consecutive cases of EF removal in the outpatient clinic between 10/06/22 and 03/02/23. Regional anaesthesia using ultrasound-guided blockade of peripheral nerves was administered using 1% lidocaine due to its rapid onset and short half-life. Patients were assessed for additional analgesia requirements and then were asked to evaluate their experience and perceived pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results

Fifty patients were included in the study. The mean age was 46.8 years (range 21-85 years). About 54% of the patients were male patients (N = 27). Post-procedure, all patients indicated positive satisfaction ratings, each participant responded as either 'satisfied' (N = 6), 'very satisfied' (N = 24) or 'highly satisfied' (N = 20). In addition, 90% of the participants reported that they would opt for this method of EF removal again in future. The VAS for pain immediately following completion of the procedure was low, with a mean score of 0.36 (range 0-4), where a score of 0 = 'No pain', and 10 = 'worst pain possible'. The median score was 0.

Conclusion

We present the first description of outpatient EF removal using regional anaesthesia, with a prospective case series of 50 fully conscious patients from whom the EF was removed. This novel technique is likely to be cost-effective, reproducible, and safe. This technique reduces the burden of EF removal from an operating list and also improves the patient's experience when compared with other forms of conscious sedation. By eliminating the use of Entonox and methoxyflurane for sedation and analgesia, this technique also demonstrates a method of improving environmental sustainability.

How to cite this article

Williams LM, Stamps G, Peak H, et al. Circular External Fixator Removal in the Outpatient Clinic Using Regional Anaesthesia: A Pilot Study of A Novel Approach. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(1):7-11.

Analgesic efficacy of a bilateral erector spinae plane block versus a fentanyl constant rate infusion in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is an ultrasound-guided interfascial plane block used to provide analgesia in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy. The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of a bilateral ESPB with a fentanyl constant rate infusion (CRI) in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. Anaesthetic records of client-owned dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy (June 2019-August 2020), and in which a bilateral ESPB was performed (group ESPB), were retrieved and compared to a cohort of 39 dogs that underwent hemilaminectomy (September 2014 - June 2017) and in which a fentanyl CRI (2 μg/kg bolus followed by 5 μg/kg/hour) was used as a primary intraoperative analgesia (group CRI). The prevalence of dogs in which intraoperative rescue fentanyl boluses were administered, the total dose of rescue fentanyl boluses administered, the postoperative methadone requirement and anaesthetic complications during the first 24 postoperative hours were evaluated. Univariate statistical analysis was used.

RESULTS

Group ESPB comprised of 93 dogs. The bilateral ESPB was performed using a median (range) levobupivacaine volume of 1 (0.5-1.7) mL/kg per side, at a concentration of 0.125% (0.12-0.25). At least one rescue fentanyl bolus was administered in 54.8% and in 56.4% of dogs in group ESPB and CRI, respectively (p > 0.99). The number of rescue fentanyl boluses was higher in group CRI (p = 0.006), especially during lumbar hemilaminectomy. Rescue fentanyl boluses were more frequently administered from skin incision to end of vertebral lamina drilling in group CRI (p = 0.001), and from end of vertebral lamina drilling to end of surgery in group ESPB (p = 0.0002). During the first 6 (p = 0.0035) and 6-12 (p = 0.0005) postoperative hours, the number of dogs that required at least one dose of methadone was higher in group CRI. In group ESPB, dogs were more likely to become hypothermic (p = 0.04). One dog, not included in the study, developed sinus arrest after performing a caudal thoracic ESPB.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the conditions of this study, a bilateral ESPB was associated with a lower number of rescue fentanyl boluses administered in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy, especially between skin incision to end of vertebral lamina drilling. Despite ESPB being associated with a reduced opioid consumption during the first 12 hours postoperatively, differences in the postoperative management precluded any firm conclusion regarding its postoperative effect.

Lumbar plexus terminal branch block, a safe alternative for transfemoral aortic valve implantation. Case report

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is an alternative treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis, it is conventionally performed under general anaesthesia or local anaesthesia plus sedation. We present the first case of trans-femoral, trans-catheter aortic valve implantation, performed in our hospital in a patient with severe aortic stenosis, who was a high surgical risk. Anaesthesia consisted of a combination of bilateral selective blockade of the iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal and genitofemoral nerves with the patient awake without sedation, using an ultrasound-guided approach. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was successful and passed without incident, the patient remained immobile, calm, did not report pain, and sedation or hypnotics were not necessary during dilation of the vascular accesses with the introducer. Standard monitoring demonstrated haemodynamic stability, without cardiovascular repercussions and did not necessitate vasopressor or inotropic drug support. After the intervention, the patient was sent to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, where he remained asymptomatic and stable. Subsequently, the patient was admitted to the cardiology ward from where he was discharged without complications.

Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks for preoperative pain management in hip fractures: a systematic review

Systematic reviews associate peripheral nerve blocks based on anatomic landmarks or nerve stimulation with reduced pain and need for systemic analgesia in hip fracture patients. We aimed to investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks compared to conventional analgesia for preoperative pain management in hip fractures. Five databases were searched until June 2021 to identify randomised controlled trials. Two independent authors extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Data was pooled for meta-analysis and quality of evidence was evaluated using Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). We included 12 trials (976 participants) comparing ultrasound-guided nerve blocks to conventional systemic analgesia. In favour of ultrasound, pain measured closest to two hours after block placement decreased with a mean difference of -2.26 (VAS 0 to 10); (p < 0.001) 95% CI [–2.97 to –1.55]. In favour of ultrasound, preoperative analgesic usage of iv. morphine equivalents in milligram decreased with a mean difference of –5.34 (p=0.003) 95% CI [–8.11 to –2.58]. Time from admission until surgery ranged from six hours to more than three days. Further, ultrasound-guided nerve blocks may be associated with a lower frequency of delirium: risk ratio 0.6 (p = 0.03) 95% CI [0.38 to 0.94], fewer serious adverse events: risk ratio 0.33 (p = 0.006) 95% CI [0.15 to 0.73] and higher patient satisfaction: mean difference 25.9 (VAS 0 to 100) (p < 0.001) 95% CI [19.74 to 32.07]. However, the quality of evidence was judged low or very low. In conclusion, despite low quality of evidence, ultrasound-guided blocks were associated with benefits compared to conventional systemic analgesia.

Non-COVID surgical load of operation theatre during COVID-19 pandemic in Armed Forces tertiary care centres: "Snapshot of two timelines"

Background

The global COVID-19 pandemic has led to major changes in the surgical caseloads in the operation theatres across the world. Elective surgeries have been curtailed to a great extent and the number of emergency surgeries has risen. We conducted a study to assess the changes in the surgical caseloads in two tertiary care hospitals in India during the pandemic and to assess the changes in anaesthesia techniques used.

Methods

A multicentre retrospective observational study conducted at two tertiary care centres located 1500 kms apart. Hospital A in a city with high incidence of COVID-19 and Hospital B with a lighter load of COVID-19 cases. Record of all major surgeries carried out between 01Jul 2020 and 31 Dec 2020 were compared with the surgeries carried out between 01 Jul 2019 and 31 Dec 2019.

Results

There was a decrease of almost 53% in elective surgical workload in hospital A and 71% in hospital B. The decrease in the cases was not similar across all specialities. There was a significant increase in the percentage of emergency surgeries from 11.1% to 24% in hospital A and from 22.1% to 29.8% in hospital B in the year 2020. A statistically significant increase in regional anaesthesia and neuraxial blockade was noted in the year 2020 in both the hospitals.

Conclusion

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of elective surgical cases has significantly decreased in specialities like ophthalmology whereas there was no change in the surgical workload in specialities like obstetrics, oncology, orthopaedics, and neurosurgery. There was significant increase in the use of regional and neuraxial techniques of anaesthesia.

[Rebound pain-From definition to treatment]

Hintergrund

Rebound pain als Nebenwirkung einer Regionalanästhesie ist ein übermäßiges Schmerzempfinden nach Abklingen der Wirkung der lokalen Betäubung, welches deutlich über den normalen Wundschmerz nach einer Operation hinausgeht. Dieses Phänomen rückt seit ca. 10 Jahren stärker in den Fokus der Forschung. Die konkreten Ursachen sind bisher unklar, und es existieren auch noch keine zielgerichteten Therapieempfehlungen.

Ziel der Arbeit

Dieser Übersichtsartikel soll der Leserschaft einen Überblick über den aktuellen Stand der Forschung geben. Es werden die Theorien zur Pathophysiologie vorgestellt und Prophylaxe- sowie Behandlungsstrategien erläutert.

Material und Methoden

Für diese Übersichtsarbeit wurden die von 2005 bis Mai 2021 auf PubMed erschienenen Publikationen zum Thema Rebound pain durchgesehen und die Definitionen der Autoren zu Rebound pain sowie die Annahmen zur Pathophysiologie und Therapieempfehlungen zusammengefasst.

Ergebnisse und Diskussion

Insgesamt wurden 22 Originalarbeiten im Hinblick auf die Definition von Rebound pain, die Annahme der Entstehung sowie Therapieoptionen ausgewertet. Dabei zeigt sich, dass keine einheitliche Definition existiert, die Pathophysiologie nicht eindeutig geklärt ist und zum aktuellen Zeitpunkt auch noch keine klaren Empfehlungen zu Prophylaxe sowie Therapie gegeben werden können.

Zusatzmaterial online

Die Online-Version dieses Beitrags (10.1007/s00101-022-01120-z) enthält eine tabellarische Zusammenstellung über Studiendesign sowie Kernaussagen der vorgestellten Studien.

Pain management during a bromelain-based selective enzymatic debridement in paediatric and adult burn patients

BACKGROUND

Pain associated with surgical or enzymatic burn wound debridement prevents many burn centres from working outside an operating theatre, creating a burden. Alternatives for general anaesthesia to manage pain in burn patients treated with enzymatic debridements, such as regional anaesthesia, have not been studied in detail. This study explores the different possibilities for pain management during a bedside NexoBrid™ procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a single-centre retrospective study that included 82 paediatric, adolescent, and adult patients with deep dermal and full-thickness burns treated bedside with NexoBrid™ under regional or general anaesthesia. Outcome measures were pain during the NexoBrid™ procedure, the safety of the anaesthesia and the NexoBrid™ procedure, logistics of the bedside NexoBrid™ procedure, and time to wound closure.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients in the adult group (43/67, 64%) only presented with burn wounds on one upper or the one or two lower extremities. In 29 of them (29/43, 67%), a NexoBrid™ procedure was performed under regional anaesthesia, which resulted in low pain levels without any adverse events. All seven patients in the paediatric group, where only one upper or one or two lower limbs were involved (7/15, 47%), underwent a NexoBrid™ procedure performed under regional anaesthesia where no adverse events were reported. In these children, the use of regional anaesthesia was associated with a significant decrease in time to wound closure (average treatment effect on the treated = -22.5 days, p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights that regional anaesthesia administered at the bedside should be the method of choice for pain management during NexoBrid™ procedures because often, it can be adequately and safely performed in all age groups. This approach will reduce the burden on operating theatres. A flow chart has been developed to guide pain management during a NexoBrid™ procedure.

Efficacy of perineural dexamethasone in prolonging duration of analgesia with peripheral nerve blocks compared to intravenous dexamethasone: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Perineural dexamethasone has been regarded as a promising adjunct for prolonging the duration of nerve blocks. However, it is uncertain whether its effects are due to local effects on the nerves or from systemic absorption. This systematic review aimed to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia associated with perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone as an adjunct to peripheral nerve blocks.

Methods

A total of 2,216 relevant academic articles were identified after a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from 1967 until 2020. All randomized controlled trials that compared perineural and intravenous dexamethasone as adjuncts to peripheral nerve limb blocks were included.

Results

Fifteen randomized controlled trials (1,467 cases; 738 perineural dexamethasone, 729 intravenous dexamethasone) were eligible. The primary outcome (duration of analgesia) was significantly longer in the perineural than in the intravenous dexamethasone group (mean difference [MD]: 2.72 h, 95% CI [1.42, 4.01], P < 0.001). Perineural dexamethasone was also found to prolong the sensory block (MD: 3.45 h, 95% CI [1.36, 5.54], P = 0.001) and lower 24 h postoperative pain scores (MD: −0.74 h, 95% CI [−1.40, −0.07], P = 0.03).

Conclusions

This review confirms the greater efficacy of perineural compared to intravenous dexamethasone in prolonging the analgesic duration of peripheral nerve blocks. However, the extent of prolongation was small and may not represent a clinically meaningful difference.

Current practice of thoracic anaesthesia in Europe - a survey by the European Society of Anaesthesiology Part I - airway management and regional anaesthesia techniques

Background

The scientific working group for “Anaesthesia in thoracic surgery” of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) has performed an online survey to assess the current standards of care and structural properties of anaesthesia workstations in thoracic surgery.

Methods

All members of the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) were invited to participate in the study.

Results

Thoracic anaesthesia was most commonly performed by specialists/board-certified anaesthetists and/or senior/attending physicians. Across Europe, the double lumen tube (DLT) was most commonly chosen as the primary device for lung separation (461/ 97.3%). Bronchial blockers were chosen less frequently (9/ 1.9%).

Throughout Europe, bronchoscopy was not consistently used to confirm correct double lumen tube positioning. Respondents from Eastern Europe (32/ 57.1%) frequently stated that there were not enough bronchoscopes available for every intrathoracic operation. A specific algorithm for difficult airway management in thoracic anaesthesia was available to only 18.6% (n = 88) of the respondents. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the most commonly used form of regional analgesia for thoracic surgery in Europe. Ultrasonography was widely available 93,8% (n = 412) throughout Europe and was predominantly used for central line placement and lung diagnostics.

Conclusions

While certain „gold standards “are widely met, there are also aspects of care requiring substantial improvement in thoracic anaesthesia throughout Europe.

Our data suggest that algorithms and standard operating procedures for difficult airway management in thoracic anaesthesia need to be established. A European recommendation for the basic requirements of an anaesthesia workstation for thoracic anaesthesia is expedient and desirable, to improve structural quality and patient safety.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01480-w.

Two types of anaesthesia and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA): a secondary analysis based on a single-centre retrospective cohort study in Singapore

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding the relationship between the type of anaesthesia and length of hospital stay is controversial. Therefore, the objective of this research was to investigate whether the type of anaesthesia was independently related to the length of hospital stay in patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after adjusting for other covariates.

METHODS

The present study was a cohort study. A total of 2622 participants underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a hospital in Singapore from 2013 to 1-1 to 2014-6-30. The target independent variable and the dependent variable were two types of anaesthesia and length of hospital stay, respectively. The covariates included age, BMI, hemoglobin (Hb), length of stay (LOS), duration of surgery, sex, ethnicity, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Status, smoking, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), diabetes mellitus (DM), DM on insulin, ischemic heart disease (IHD), congestive cardiac failure (CCF), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), creatinine > 2 mg/dl, day of week of operation. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were performed on the variables that might influence the choice of the two types of anaesthesia and the LOS. This association was then tested by subgroup analysis using hierarchical variables.

RESULTS

The average age of 2366 selected participants was 66.57 ± 8.23 years old, and approximately 24.18% of them were male. The average LOS of all enrolled patients was 5.37 ± 4.87 days, 5.92 ± 6.20 days for patients receiving general anaesthesia (GA) and 5.09 ± 3.98 days for patients receiving regional anaesthesia (RA), P < 0.05. The results of fully adjusted linear regression showed that GA lasted 0.93 days longer than RA (β = 0.93, 95% CI (0.54, 1.32)), P < 0.05. The results of fully adjusted logistic regression showed that LOS > 6 days was 45% higher for GA than for RA (OR = 1.45, 95% CI (1.15, 1.84)), P < 0.05. Through the subgroup analysis, the results were basically stable and reliable.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that GA increased the length of stay during unilateral TKA compared with RA. This finding needs to be validated in future studies.

Postoperative neurological complications after brachial plexus block: a retrospective study conducted at a teaching hospital

PURPOSE

Serious complications after ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia can be devastating for the patient. The pathogenesis of postoperative neurological complications (PONC) is multifactorial and includes mechanical, vascular and chemical factors besides the nerve puncture itself. The primary aim of this study was to assess the incidence of PONC after brachial plexus block (BPB).

METHODS

This is an observational retrospective single-centre study conducted at the regional anaesthesia unit of a teaching hospital. All BPBs performed from January 2011 to November 2019 were included. The outcomes analysed were the incidence, aetiology and diagnosis of PONCs and the incidence of other postoperative complications such as local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), pneumothorax, wrong-side block, etc. The performance of trainees and experienced anaesthesiologists was compared across all the outcomes.

RESULTS

From a total of 5340 BPBs included, 15 cases developed PONC, yielding a rate of 2.81:1000 (95% CI 1.70-4.63). Thirteen patients underwent neurophysiological exams which confirmed nine neuropathies. The rate of PONCs for supervised trainees was 1.80:1000 (95% CI 0.701-4.62), not statistically different from that of experienced anaesthesiologists (p = 0.241). Three cases were considered to present with a PONC probably related to BPB [0.562:1,00 (95% CI 0.191-1.65)]. The incidence of long-term PONCs was 1.12:1000 (95% CI 0.515-2.45). Such complications proved irreversible in 2 cases. The incidences of LAST, pneumothorax and other complications observed were 0.749:1000 (95% CI 0.291-1.92), 0.187:1000 (95% CI 0.0331-1.06) and 4.31:1000 (95% CI 2.87-6.46), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey suggests that complications after ultrasound-guided BPB, including blocks performed by trainees, are uncommon.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT04451642.

[Peripheral Regional Anaesthesia for Perioperative Analgesia]

Peripheral Regional Anaesthesia for Perioperative Analgesia Abstract. Peripheral regional anaesthesia is the actual gold standard of opioid-sparing perioperative analgesia and is mainly used for surgery of the shoulder, arm and leg. Well-trained anaesthesiologists are the prerequisite for the correct individual risk-benefit assessment and the performance of the nerve blocks using a combination of ultrasound guidance and peripheral nerve stimulation (dual guidance). The postoperative care of the patients requires trained staff.

Pain after upper limb surgery under peripheral nerve block is associated with gut microbiome composition and diversity

Gut microbiota play a role in certain pain states. Hence, these microbiota also influence somatic pain. We aimed to determine if there was an association between gut microbiota (composition and diversity) and postoperative pain. Patients (n = 20) undergoing surgical fixation of distal radius fracture under axillary brachial plexus block were studied. Gut microbiota diversity and abundance were analysed for association with: (i) a verbal pain rating scale of < 4/10 throughout the first 24 h after surgery (ii) a level of pain deemed "acceptable" by the patient during the first 24 h following surgery (iii) a maximum self-reported pain score during the first 24 h postoperatively and (iv) analgesic consumption during the first postoperative week. Analgesic consumption was inversely correlated with the Shannon index of alpha diversity. There were also significant differences, at the genus level (including Lachnospira), with respect to pain being "not acceptable" at 24 h postoperatively. Porphyromonas was more abundant in the group reporting an acceptable pain level at 24 h. An inverse correlation was noted between abundance of Collinsella and maximum self-reported pain score with movement. We have demonstrated for the first time that postoperative pain is associated with gut microbiota composition and diversity. Further work on the relationship between the gut microbiome and somatic pain may offer new therapeutic targets.

Regional Anaesthesia for Lower Extremity Amputation is Associated with Reduced Post-operative Complications Compared with General Anaesthesia

OBJECTIVE

Primary and secondary lower extremity amputation, performed for patients with lower extremity arterial disease, is associated with increased post-operative morbidity. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of regional anaesthesia vs. general anaesthesia on post-operative pulmonary complications.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 45 492 patients undergoing lower extremity amputation between 2005 and 2018 was conducted using data from the American College of Surgeons National Safety Quality Improvement Program database. Multivariable logistic regression was carried out to assess differences in primary outcome of post-operative pulmonary complications (pneumonia or respiratory failure requiring re-intubation) within 48 hours and 30 days after surgery between patients receiving regional (RA) or general anaesthesia (GA). Secondary outcomes included post-operative blood transfusion, septic shock, re-operation, and post-operative death within 30 days.

RESULTS

Of 45 492 patients, 40 026 (88.0%) received GA and 5 466 (12.0%) RA. Patients who received GA had higher odds of developing pulmonary complications at 48 hours (2.1% vs. 1.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 - 1.78; p = .007) and within 30 days (6.3% vs. 5.9%; aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.09 - 1.78; p = .039). The odds of blood transfusions (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 - 1.21; p = .017), septic shock (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.60; p = .025) and re-operation (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.53; p = .023) were also higher for patients who received GA vs. patients who received RA. No difference in mortality rate was observed between patients who received GA and those who received RA (5.7% vs. 7.1%; odds ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 - 1.07).

CONCLUSION

A statistically significant reduction in pulmonary complications was observed in patients who received RA for lower extremity amputation compared with GA.

Sleep disturbances and related disordered breathing after hip replacement surgery: A randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Mechanisms of postoperative sleep architecture disturbances and sleep-disordered breathing are uncertain. The authors hypothesised that patients undergoing surgery under regional anaesthesia without opioids used for postoperative analgesia would experience lesser changes in these parameters than patients operated under general anaesthesia with per- and postoperative opioids.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After ethical approval and informed consent, patients undergoing total hip replacement were included in a prospective, randomised trial comparing 3 groups of patients: (1) S-LPB group receiving spinal anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia by lumbar plexus block; (2) GA-PCA group receiving general anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia by morphine patient-controlled analgesia; (3) GA-LPB group receiving general anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia by lumbar plexus block. Outcome measurements were polysomnographic parameters of sleep architecture and sleep-disordered breathing.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients completed the 5-night study protocol (preoperative night: N-1, postoperative nights: N1 to N4). The percentage of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep decreased by 49% and 47% during N1 in the GA-PCA and GA-LPB groups respectively. A rebound phenomenon of more than 40% in the GA-PCA group and 25% in the GA-LPB group was observed during N2 and N3. Apnoea hypopnoea index (AHI) and the number of arousals per hour were significantly increased during N2 and N3 when compared with N-1 in the GA-groups. No sleep architecture disturbances and no sleep-disordered breathing were measured in the S-LPB group.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative sleep architecture and breathing pattern were disturbed in GA groups. Both were preserved under spinal anaesthesia associated with a free opioid postoperative analgesia.

The impact of aminophylline on incidence and severity of post-dural puncture headache: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis aimed at addressing the impact of aminophylline use on risk and severity of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH).

METHODS

Electronic databases (i.e., Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane controlled trials register) were searched from inception to the 12^th of January 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy of aminophylline for treatment (i.e., primary outcome) or prophylaxis (i.e., secondary outcome) against PDPH in various clinical settings. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020207713).

RESULTS

A total of ten RCTs (n = 976) were included for analysis. Five studies (n = 270) revealed a lower pain score in patients with PDPH receiving aminophylline than that in the placebo group (standardised mean differences = -1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.76 to -0.91). In contrast, five trials (four on Caesarean sections and one on lower extremity surgeries, n = 706) demonstrated no prophylactic effect of aminophylline against PDPH at 24 [risk ratio (RR) = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.30-1.63, n = 637], 48 (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.22-1.05, n = 506), and 72 (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.54-1.48, n = 317) hours. Nevertheless, sensitivity analysis demonstrated significant prophylactic efficacy after removal of one study adopting a relatively low dose of aminophylline (RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.19-0.67). Most studies reported no increase in the incidence of adverse events associated with aminophylline use compared with that in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that aminophylline might be a reasonable alternative for treating PDPH. However, its use for prevention was not established in this meta-analysis and further large-scale studies are warranted to support this option.

Factors associated with low levels of patient satisfaction following peripheral nerve block

Peripheral nerve blocks can provide surgical anaesthesia as well as excellent postoperative analgesia. When questioned postoperatively, however, some patients report low levels of satisfaction with their nerve block experience. At our hospital, patients undergoing regional anaesthesia have their patient characteristics, block characteristics and postoperative feedback routinely recorded in a block registry. We analysed data from 979 consecutive patients undergoing peripheral nerve block for orthopaedic surgery to identify factors associated with low levels of patient satisfaction. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with their peripheral nerve block (scale 1-5: 4-5 is 'satisfied', 1-3 is 'not satisfied'). Eighty-nine percent (871/979) of patients reported being 'satisfied' with their block. Factors negatively associated with patient satisfaction were rebound pain (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.85 for moderate rebound pain; aOR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.48 for severe rebound pain), discomfort during the block (aOR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.82 for moderate discomfort; aOR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.76 for severe discomfort) and pain in the post-anaesthesia care unit (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.55 for pain ≥8/10). Only 24% (26/108) of patients who reported being 'not satisfied' stated that they would be unwilling to undergo a hypothetical future nerve block. Rebound pain of at least moderate intensity, procedural discomfort of at least moderate intensity and severe pain in the post-anaesthesia care unit are all negatively associated with patient satisfaction. Of these factors, rebound pain occurs most frequently, being present in 52% (403/777) of our respondents.

Antiplatelet therapy in pregnancy: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review contemporary data on the safety of clopidogrel and newer antiplatelet agents in pregnant women, with particular attention to maternal and neonatal complications.

METHODS

The review protocol was published via PROSPERO (ID 42020165235) and conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Databases were searched using MeSH and free text terms encompassing the included antiplatelets, relevant indications, and pregnancy. Included studies reported the drug dose, the stage of pregnancy at which it was administered, and at least one primary or secondary outcome relating to pregnancy. The primary outcome was reporting of complications associated with antiplatelet use in pregnancy.

RESULTS

The search yielded 5271 results. 39 publications were included, incorporating 42 live births. The mean age of women was 34.6 years. Seven different antiplatelet agents were described, clopidogrel being most frequent (n = 37). 14 women received antiplatelet therapy in the first trimester. 14 women had regional anaesthesia (12 while taking clopidogrel), all without complication. Two women developed bleeding post caesarean section. There were no recorded neonatal delivery complications. Two neonates had congenital anomalies not felt to be related to maternal antiplatelet use.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review describes outcomes for both mothers and neonates when exposed to clopidogrel at varying durations throughout gestation, and does not suggest higher than acceptable risk, with a congenital anomaly rate comparable to background risk. Evidence for other antiplatelet agents remains limited. Regional anaesthesia should be offered, with recommendation to stop prior to delivery in line with national guidance and in the context of individualised decision making.

Needle insertion forces and fluid injection pressures during targeting of nerves in a soft embalmed cadaver model

PURPOSE

Forceful needle-nerve contact and high subepineural pressures and are recognised causes of nerve damage. Pressure and force measurements are necessary to inform the mechanisms of nerve injury, build virtual simulator environments and provide operator feedback during simulation training. However, the range of pressures and forces encountered at tissue layers during targeted needle insertion and fluid injection are not known.

METHODS

We built a needle that recorded in-line pressure during fluid injection and continuously measured force at the needle tip. Two anaesthetists were randomised to insert a 21 g block needle at 48 nerve sites on both sides of 3 soft embalmed Thiel cadavers. Our objective was to measure pressure and force during the course of targeted nerve injection at epimysium, in perineural tissue, on epineurium and during subepineural injection. At each interface, we infused a 0.5 ml bolus of embalming solution at a rate of 12 ml min^-1 and recorded the pressure response. Force was measured continuously in the background throughout the procedure.

RESULTS

Pressure was greater at epineurium and within subepineurium than perineural tissue, geometric ratio (95% CI) 4.7 (3.0-7.3) kPa and 3.8 (2.5-5.7) kPa, respectively, both P < 0.0001. Force on nerve contact and on nerve penetration was greater than force in perineural tissue, geometric ratios (95% CI) 3.0 (1.9-4.7) N and 3.6 (2.2-7.5) N, respectively, both P < 0.0001. On nerve contact, 1 in 6 insertions were ≥ 5 N CONCLUSIONS: Despite valid infusion pressures, anaesthetists exerted excessive force on nerves.

New composite scale for evaluating peripheral nerve block quality in upper limb orthopaedics surgery

INTRODUCTION

Developments in ultrasound guided (UG) peripheral nerve block (PNB) techniques have significant advantages for patients undergoing trauma surgery. Brachial plexus blockade (BPB) for upper extremity surgery provide superior analgesia, improve recovery and patient satisfaction. To the best of our knowledge there is no tool for evaluation of the quality of UG PNB which concerns the quality of PNB, the tolerance of the patient towards the anaesthetic approach, and postoperative analgesia as well.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Standardized UG BPB anaesthesia - was performed; interscalene-supraclavicular (ISC-SC) and axillary-supraclavicular (AX-SC) approach for upper limb surgery. A GCS like tool was developed with which the Sensory, Motor, Coping of patient and Postoperative (SMCP) pain qualities were measured. The quality of PNBs were evaluated by a quality of anaesthesia graded by anaesthesiologist (QAGA) and the SMCP scale as well, the means of midazolam and opioid consumption during surgery, vital parameters, postoperative pain intensity (VNRS) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Ninety three unpremedicated adult patients with ASA I-III were scheduled for unilateral upper limb surgery. Nearly the same mean volumes of local anaesthetic solution were used in the AX-SC and ISC-SC groups (28.3-31.0 ml). There were no significant difference in the quality of PNB measured by QAGA or SMCP scale between the AX-SC and the ISC-SC groups, however 75 patients were assessed as Excellent with the SMCP scale vs. 39 with the QAGA. 97.8% of the patients were in the Excellent and Good category evaluated with SMPC vs. 86% with QAGA (p < 0.001). There was no surgery abandoned due to failed PNB and no tourniquet pain was detected. There was no evidence of side effects or complications of PNB during the follow-up period.

DISCUSSION

This composite tool is designed for evaluating the loss of sensory and motor function; the coping of the patient and the postoperative pain as well. Our novel SMCP evaluation tool focuses on the overall condition of the patient during surgery and in the postoperative period. This more precise outcome evaluating scale is significantly superior to the formerly used QAGA in representing the high success rate of UG PNB.

Anaesthesia as an influence in tumour progression

Purpose

Tumour growth and the formation of metastases are essential elements in the progression of cancer. The centre of treatment is the surgical resection of primary solid tumours. But even if the tumour can be removed without microscopic residual cells, local recurrences and distant metastases occur and determine the patient’s fate. During the operation, tumour cells are shed from the primary tumour and released into the circulation. These circulating tumour cells might play an important role in the formation of new tumour sites. Therefore, a functional innate and adaptive immune system is essential, especially in this perioperative period. Anaesthesia influences consciousness and pain perception and interacts directly with the immune system and tumour cells.

Methods

Review of the current literature concerning intra- and postoperative anaesthetic decisions and tumour progression.

Results

There are beneficial aspects for patient survival associated with total intravenous anaesthesia, the use of regional anaesthetics and the avoidance of allogeneic red blood cell transfusions. Alternatives such as irradiated intraoperative blood salvage and preoperative iron supplementation may be advantageous in cases where transfusions are limited or not wanted. The immunosuppressive properties of opioids are theoretical, but strong evidence to avoid them does not exist. The application of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis do not impair the patient’s survival and may even have a positive effect on tumour regression.

Conclusion

Anaesthesia does play an important part in the perioperative period in order to improve the cancer-related outcome. Further research is necessary to make more concrete recommendations.

Editor's Choice - Regional Versus General Anaesthesia in Peripheral Vascular Surgery: a Propensity Score Matched Nationwide Cohort Study of 17 359 Procedures in Denmark

OBJECTIVE

Cardiopulmonary comorbidity is common in vascular surgery. General anaesthesia (GA) may impair perfusion and induce respiratory depression. Regional anaesthesia (RA), including neuraxial or peripheral nerve blocks, may therefore be associated with a better outcome.

METHODS

This was a nationwide retrospective cohort study. All open inguinal and infra-inguinal arterial surgical reconstructions from 2005 to 2017 were included. Data were extracted from national registries. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models and propensity score matching were used. The propensity score was derived by developing a model that predicted the probability that a given patient would receive GA based on age, comorbidity, anticoagulant medication, procedure type, and the urgency of surgery. Matching was performed in four groups based on American Society of Anesthesiologists' score I - II, score III - V, and gender. Outcome parameters included surgical and general complications (bleeding, thrombosis/embolus, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, cerebral, and >3 days intensive care therapy), length of stay, and 30 day mortality, hypothesising a better outcome after RA.

RESULTS

There were 10 509 procedures in the GA group and 6 850 in the RA group. After propensity score matching, 6 267 procedures were included in each group. Surgical and general complications were significantly more common after GA in both matched (3.8 vs. 2.5%, p < .001 and 6.5 vs. 4.2%, p < .001) and unmatched analyses (3.8 vs. 2.5%, p < .001 and 6.5 vs. 4.2%, p < .001). The 30 day mortality rate was significantly higher after GA, in matched and un matched analyses (3.1 vs. 2.4%, p = .019 and 4.1 vs. 2.4%, p < .001). There was no difference in length of stay.

CONCLUSION

RA may be associated with a better outcome, compared with GA, after open inguinal and infra-inguinal peripheral vascular surgery. In the clinical context when RA is not feasible, GA can still be considered safe.

Cadaveric comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound-guided versus 'blind' perineural injection of the tibial nerve in horses

During diagnostic evaluation of hindlimb lameness in horses the tibial nerve block is traditionally performed based on anatomical reference points, but it can be difficult to achieve effective local anaesthesia using this blind technique. Ultrasound (US)-guided injection could increase the accuracy of injection. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of both techniques. Twenty-one paired sets of cadaver hindlimbs were injected with 1 mL methylene blue using the blind or US-guided technique. There was no significant difference in stain width and length and in coloured nerve length between techniques. However, the successful rate of nerve staining was 85.7% and 47.6% for the US-guided and blind technique, respectively (P = 0.02; odds ratio 6.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-29.4). This study suggests that the US-guided technique is more accurate than the blind technique. However, in the treated sample, a single US-guided injection did not consistently result in nerve staining.

Developing a minimally-invasive anaesthesiological approach to non-intubated uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in minor and major thoracic surgery

Background

Non-intubated uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (niVATS) is a novel approach to major and minor lung resection. It benefits from a holistic anesthesiological concept with adequate pain relief and sedation in a minimal-invasive setup allowing thoracic procedures under spontaneous breathing. At present no anesthesiological gold standard for niVATS exists. The primary aim of our retrospective observational study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of minimally invasive niVATS for both minor and major pulmonary resections at our institution.

Methods

All 88 consecutive patients scheduled for niVATS minor or major thoracic procedures were included into the study. Anaesthesia was performed according to a departmental niVATS algorithm including both regional anaesthesia and sedation. Patient characteristics and early outcome data including intraoperative and postoperative findings were compared between groups. Prediction scores for postoperative complications (LAS VEGAS, ARISCAT, ThRCRI) were calculated and compared.

Results

No early mortality and a low overall morbidity rate of 28.4% were encountered. Conversion to orotracheal intubation was required in 6.8% of all cases. Postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in 15.9% of total cases and were lower than predicted by both LAS VEGAS and ARISCAT respectively. Cardiac complications were found in 1.1% and lower than predicted by ThRCRI. A persistent air leak occurred in 11.4% of total cases and was significantly higher in major resection. Postoperative chest tube duration and hospital length of stay in the major resection group exceeded times reported by other groups.

Conclusions

niVATS appears to be safe in both minor and major thoracic procedures. A minimally invasive anaesthesiological approach foregoing central iv lines, arterial blood pressure measurement and urinary catheterization is feasible. Our niVATS protocol appears to be a viable alternative for both minor and major thoracic procedures in selected patients.