Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients of small body size

Minimally Invasive Surgical Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Observational Single-Center Study in Japan

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MICS-AVR) versus transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) in Asian patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational, single-center study in Japan, including cases of MICS-AVR (n = 202) and TF-TAVR (n = 248) between 2014 and 2021. In a total of 450 cases, propensity score matching was performed at a ratio of 1:1, resulting in 96 pairs. Furthermore, we performed competing-risk regression and mediation analyses to determine the treatment effect on outcomes of interests, considering death as a competing risk, and to evaluate the mediation effect of paravalvular leak (PVL) severity.

RESULTS

There were similar incidences of all-cause death, cardiac death, stroke and cerebral hemorrhage, and aortic valve reintervention between the 2 groups. However, the TF-TAVR cohort had a longer hospital length of stay and higher rates of significant PVL compared with the MICS-AVR cohort. Multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analyses revealed that heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.129, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.038 to 0.445, p = 0.001) and permanent pacemaker implantation (HR = 0.050, 95% CI: 0.006 to 0.409, p = 0.005) favored MICS-AVR. Competing-risk regression analyses confirmed similar findings. All outcomes were unrelated to PVL severity.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first comparative study of clinical outcomes in Asian patients undergoing MICS-AVR versus TF-TAVR, revealing that MICS-AVR could be a feasible and efficient alternative to TF-TAVR. Future larger-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to validate the present results.

Managing the challenge of a small aortic annulus in patients with severe aortic stenosis

INTRODUCTION

Small aortic annulus (SAA) poses a challenge in the management of patients with severe aortic stenosis requiring aortic valve replacement - both surgical and transcatheter - since it has been associated with worse clinical outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to comprehensively summarize the available evidence regarding the management of aortic stenosis in patients with SAA and discuss the current controversies as well as future perspectives in this field.

EXPERT OPINION

It is paramount to agree in a common definition for diagnosing and properly treating SAA patients, and for that purpose, multidetector computer tomography is essential. The results of recent trials led to the expansion of transcatheter aortic valve replacement among patients of all the surgical-risk spectrum, and the choice of treatment (transcatheter, surgical) should be based on patient comorbidities, anatomical characteristics, and patient preferences.

Three-Year Outcomes of Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation According to Annular Size

Data on the association between annular size and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) outcomes beyond 1 year are limited. The present study assessed the association between the aortic annulus size and TAVI clinical and hemodynamic outcomes at 3 years of follow-up. Patients were classified according to the aortic annulus size as having small, intermediate, and large annuli (size <400, 400 to 574, and ≥575 mm², respectively). The co-primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Further, the changes in hemodynamic outcomes over the follow-up period (median 37, interquartile range: 26 to 45 months) were assessed. The present analysis included 850 patients, with 182 patients (21.4%), 538 patients (63.3%), and 130 patients (15.3%) in the small, intermediate, and large-sized aortic annulus groups, respectively. The groups had comparable age and pre-TAVI pressure gradients; however, patients with small annuli had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk scores. Adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that compared to patients with intermediate-sized annuli, patients with small and large annuli had similar all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 1.69 and HR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.16, respectively) and heart failure hospitalization rates (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.69 and HR = 1.26, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.17, respectively). However, patients with small annuli had consistently higher mean and peak pressure gradients and a higher risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch. The risks of moderate-to-severe regurgitation and structural valve deterioration were similar between the three groups. In conclusion, although patients with small annuli had higher transvalvular gradients, there was no significant association between the aortic annulus size and TAVI clinical outcomes at 3 years of follow-up. Future studies should compare the performance of transcatheter valve types in patients with different aortic annulus sizes.

Low Incidence of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Extremely Small Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with 20-mm Sapien 3

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has been developed as an emerging technique to treat patients with aortic valve disease. However, safety and outcome data on extremely small transcatheter heart valves (THV) is limited. We aimed to assess hemodynamic profiles and clinical outcome of very small balloon expandable THVs with 20-mm Sapien 3 (SP3).

We examined data for all patients who received third-generation SP3 THV at a single hospital. Complications and clinical outcomes were defined based on the VARC-2 criteria. Postoperative prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) was defined as indexed effective orifice area (EOA) < 0.85 cm2/m2. We compared clinical characteristics and outcome between patients with 20-mm (n = 21), 23-mm (n = 67), and 26- or 29-mm (n = 113) sized valves.

The 20-mm group included significantly higher number of Asian and female populations with lower body surface area. The baseline CT annular area in the 20-mm group was 316.5 ± 24.9 mm2. There was no significant difference between groups in procedural mortality or early safety at 30 days. The higher procedural complication was observed in 20-mm group due to significant differences in minor vascular and bleeding complications. Despite higher post-THV gradients and smaller indexed EOA in 20-mm group, no PPM was observed in 20-mm group. The mortality at 30 days and 1 year in 20-mm group was 4.8% and 16.7%, respectively.

The patients who received very small THVs with 20-mm SP3 did not result in PPM and experienced favorable early safety and midterm outcome in our cohort.

Comparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement between Self-Expanding versus Balloon-Expandable Valves in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus

Background and Objectives

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been reported as a good alternative for surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic annulus. Head-to-head comparisons of different transcatheter aortic valves in these patients are insufficient. We compared the outcomes after TAVR between two different types of recent transcatheter aortic valves (self-expanding vs. balloon-expandable) in patients with small aortic annulus.

Methods

A total of 70 patients with severe aortic stenosis and small annulus (mean diameter ≤23 mm or minimal diameter ≤21 mm on computed tomography) underwent TAVR with either a self-expanding valve with supra-annular location (n=45) or a balloon-expandable valve with intra-annular location (n=25). The echocardiographic hemodynamic parameters after TAVR and 1-year follow-up were compared.

Results

Between the self-expanding and balloon-expandable valve-treated patients, the clinical outcomes including permanent pacemaker implantation (11.1% vs. 8.0%), acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3 (4.4% vs. 4.0%), and major vascular complication (4.4% vs. 0.0%) were similar without all-cause mortality, stroke, and life-threatening bleeding during 30-day follow-up. Compared with the balloon-expandable valve-treated patients, the self-expanding valve-treated patients presented larger effective orifice area (EOA) (1.46±0.28 vs. 1.75±0.42 cm², p=0.002) and indexed EOA (0.95±0.21 vs. 1.18±0.28 cm²/m², p=0.001), whereas mean aortic valve gradient (11.7±2.9 vs. 8.9±5.2 mmHg, P=0.005) and incidence of ≥moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch (36.0% vs. 8.9%, p=0.009) were lower. These hemodynamic differences were maintained at 1-year follow-up.

Conclusions

TAVR with self-expanding valves was associated with superior hemodynamic outcomes compared with balloon-expandable valves in patients with small aortic annulus.

Imaging of transcatheter aortic valve replacement complications

Aortic stenosis is increasing in incidence and is now commonly managed with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in intermediate and high-risk patients. Radiologists are likely to encounter patients undergoing this procedure both pre- and postoperatively, and therefore, an understanding of procedural complications is essential. Complications may relate to the access site or approach, or the valve itself. This article will review the most common complications described in literature and focuses on the role of multidetector computed tomography (CT) in their evaluation either exclusively, or complementary to other imaging methods.

[Management of non-rhythmic complications of TAVI procedures]

Transcatheter aortic valve (TAVI) is the treatment of choice in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at high surgical risk. Recent data have also shown favorable results in patients considered to have an intermediate operative risk, which broadens the application of this new technology. Despite its success, the TAVI procedure has been associated with life-threatening complications. Advances in preoperative screening and patient selection have reduced the incidence of these complications. When these complications occur, early recognition and rapid management are essential. The purpose of this review is to describe non-rhythmic mechanical complications attributable to TAVI procedures with their predictive factors, how to prevent and manage them.

Significance of echocardiographic evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is widely accepted as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis (AS). Existing scientific evidence demonstrates that TAVI is superior to SAVR, and it is expected that indications for the clinical applications of TAVI will be expanded in the future. Echocardiography plays a key role in perioperative assessment of patients undergoing TAVI. Preprocedural echocardiographic evaluation is important to determine the severity of AS in addition to patients' anatomical suitability for TAVI. Furthermore, echocardiography is essential for intraoperative guidance, assessment of complications, postoperative evaluation, and prognostic prediction. Inaccurate echocardiographic measurements and evaluation can lead to less-than-optimal/inappropriate treatment strategies in patients with AS. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the limitations of echocardiographic evaluation is important. This review summarizes the role of echocardiographic evaluation in patients undergoing TAVI.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with an extremely small native aortic annulus: The OCEAN-TAVI registry

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been reported to be advantageous over surgical aortic valve replacement owing to the low incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and large effective orifice area (EOA). However, data on TAVI for extremely small annuli are limited. The present study aimed to compare post-procedural hemodynamics and morphology between 20-mm and 23-mm Sapien XT (SXT) transcatheter heart valves (THVs) with extremely small annuli (<314mm²).

METHODS

All patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with TAVI at eight Japanese centers between October 2013 and January 2016 were prospectively included in the Optimized CathEter vAlvular iNtervention (OCEAN-TAVI) registry. In the overall cohort of 20-mm (19 patients) and 23-mm SXTs (492 patients) with extremely small annuli, the patient groups were matched one-to-one using propensity scores, and post-procedural echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography data were compared for 18 matched patients from each group (matched cohort).

RESULTS

In the matched cohort, the mean gradient was higher (15.4±4.1 vs. 12.2±4.8mmHg, p=0.04), EOA was lower (1.22±0.25 vs. 1.44±0.37cm², p=0.02) and THV area was lower (245.6±19.1 vs. 298.5±33.3mm², p<0.01) in the 20-mm group than in the 23-mm group. However, all patients in both groups were asymptomatic. Although moderate PPM was more prevalent in the 20-mm group than in the 23-mm group (31.6% vs. 7.9%, p<0.01), the incidence of severe PPM was low and similar between the groups (0% vs. 0.4%, p=1.00) in the overall cohort.

CONCLUSION

A 20-mm SXT in patients who require a small bioprosthesis leads to favorable short-term outcomes.

Risk stratification using lean body mass in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of skeletal muscle mass, assessed using lean body mass (LBM), remain unclear in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The aim of this study to assess prognostic impact of LBM on mortality after TAVR.

METHODS

We assessed 1,613 patients (median age 85 years, 70% female) who underwent TAVI from October 2013 to April 2016 using OCEAN (Optimized transCathEter vAlvular interveNtion)-TAVI registry data. LBM was calculated using the James formula. The primary endpoint was all-cause death after TAVR.

RESULTS

Median follow-up period was 287 days (interquartile range 110-462). The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients with low LBM had significantly higher incidence of all-cause death than those with high LBM in male (32.3% vs. 9.9%, log rank P < 0.001) and female (15.8% vs. 9.2%, log-rank P = 0.011). On contrary, the risk stratification using body mass index (BMI) could not validate into female patients who underwent TAVR. The multivariate analysis showed that the LBM was an independent predictor of all-cause death in male (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.98) and female (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.89-0.99). Inversely, the assessment using BMI could not identify the high-risk population in a female.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with low LBM had the higher incidence of all-cause death after TAVR than those with high LBM, regardless of gender. Thus, the risk stratification using LBM might provide further insight to identify the high-risk TAVR population, compared to conventional risk stratification using BMI.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Small Anatomy: Patient Selection and Technical Challenges

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a standard treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Although this technique has reached relative maturity, further optimisation of patient selection and device implantation is essential to improve prognosis. Smaller body size is a predictor of a challenging TAVI procedure due to specific anatomical difficulty and adverse events including annulus rupture, acute coronary obstruction and vascular complications. A newer generation, lower profile TAVI system is useful for patients with smaller anatomy. Moreover, TAVI is superior to surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with a narrowing annulus because this treatement has a low incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Annular Rupture During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Predictors, Management and Outcomes

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the treatment of choice in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who are either inoperable or at high risk for conventional surgical aortic valve replacement. Recent data have also shown favourable outcomes in patients deemed to be at intermediate operative risk, which expands the application of this novel technology. Despite its success, TAVI has been associated with rare life-threatening complications. Of these, aortic annular rupture is considered to be the most devastating. Advances in pre-procedural screening and patient selection have reduced the incidence of annular rupture. When this complication occurs, early recognition and prompt management are essential. This article is intended to provide a comprehensive review of the predictors, management and clinical outcomes of aortic annular rupture.

Efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with Edwards SAPIEN 3 and XT in smaller Asian anatomy

We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using Edwards SAPIEN 3 (S3) valve and SAPIEN XT) in smaller anatomy. The new generation S3 TAVI device has been used worldwide; however, its efficacy and safety in smaller Asian anatomy remain unknown. Between February 2014 and March 2017, 166 consecutive patients (S3, 54; XT, 112) were treated with balloon-expandable TAVI in a single center and their outcomes were analyzed. Median patient age was 85 (range: 81-88) years and mean body surface area was 1.41 ± 0.15 m². A 23-mm size valve was used in S3 and XT groups (70 vs. 62%, p = 0.224). The transfemoral approach was more frequently used in the S3 than in the XT group (96 vs. 72%, p < 0.001). Although, the minimal luminal diameter of the femoral artery was smaller in the S3 group (5.9 vs. 6.4 mm, p = 0.001), the rates of major (2 vs. 11%, p = 0.226) and minor (11 vs. 5%, p = 0.107) vascular complications did not increase. The frequency of paravalvular leaks (PVL) ≥ 2 was significantly reduced in the S3 group (11 vs. 61%, p < 0.001); however, pre- (24 vs. 91%, p < 0.001) and post- (4 vs. 19%, p < 0.001) dilatations were less frequently performed. Pacemaker implantation incidence did not increase (4 vs. 5%, p = 1.0) and peak velocity of the transcatheter heart valve was significantly higher in the S3 group (2.3 vs. 2.2 m/s, p = 0.046). Device success was high (89 vs. 93%, p = 0.387) while the 30-day all-cause mortality was low (2 vs. 1%, p = 0.583) in both groups. TAVI with the S3 device was safe and effective, with low incidence of vascular complications and reduced PVL, in smaller body-sized Asians.

Incidence, Predictors, and Mid-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Closure Failure After Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation Using an Expandable Sheath (from the Optimized Transcatheter Valvular Intervention [OCEAN-TAVI] Registry)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of percutaneous closure device (PCD) failure during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with an Edwards Sapien-XT prosthesis using an expandable sheath (eSheath). From October 2013 to April 2016, 1,215 patients who underwent TAVI were prospectively enrolled in the Optimized Transcatheter Valvular Intervention (OCEAN-TAVI) registry. Of these, 478 patients underwent transfemoral TAVI with Sapien-XT prosthesis using an eSheath and percutaneous closure with a Perclose ProGlide system. We evaluated the predictors of PCD failure and whether it affected the clinical outcomes. Patients were aged 85 years (interquartile range 82 to 88 years). PCD failure occurred in 36 patients (8%). Sheath-to-femoral artery ratio (SFAR) (per 1 increase) (odds ratio 5.40, 95% confidence interval 1.28 to 22.92, p = 0.022) predicted PCD failure in a multivariate model. The sensitivity-specificity curves identified an SFAR threshold of 1.03; the area under the curve for SFAR as a predictor of PCD failure was 0.629. The PCD failure group did not have a higher rate of 30-day mortality (0% vs 1%, p = 0.52) or mid-term (365-day) mortality (log-rank test p = 0.85) compared with the PCD success group in the Kaplan-Meier analysis. In conclusion, PCD failures occurred in 8% of the patients and were not associated with 30-day or mid-term mortality rates after percutaneous transfemoral TAVI. The SFAR threshold of 1.03 was useful for predicting PCD failures.

Meta-Analysis of Effect of Body Mass Index on Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Controversial data exist regarding the impact of body mass index (BMI) on TAVI outcomes. Thirteen TAVI studies were included and analyzed for the incidence of procedural complications, 30-day, and long-term all-cause mortality. Three comparisons were executed: (1) underweight versus normal weight, (2) overweight versus normal weight, and (3) obese versus normal weight patients. Underweight patients (BMI <20 kg/m²) had similar 30-day all-cause mortality compared with the normal, although they displayed a significant worse survival at long-term follow-up (hazard ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09 to 2.59, p = 0.02). Underweight patients showed a higher incidence of major and life-threatening bleedings (2,566 patients, odds ratio 1.64, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.45, p = 0.02) and of major vascular complications (2,566 patients, odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.98, p = 0.01), compared with normal weight patients. Overweight patients (BMI ≥25 and <30 kg/m²) display similar 30-day and long-term all-cause mortality, as well as similar procedural complication rate compared with normal weight patients. Obese patients (BMI >30 kg/m²) had similar 30-day all-cause mortality rates compared with the normal weight category, whereas they displayed a significant better survival at long-term (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.93, p = 0.004). Procedural complications did not differ between obese and normal body weight patients. In conclusion, a low BMI is linked to a significantly worse prognosis after TAVI. Therefore, BMI represents an important and handily tool that might be used in the risk prediction of patients to be addressed for TAVI.

Prognostic value of body mass index and body surface area on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND

Inverse associations between Body Mass Index (BMI) and Body Surface Area (BSA) with mortality in patients after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) have been reported. This "obesity paradox" is controversial, and it remains unclear which parameter, BMI or BSA, is of greater prognostic value. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of BMI and BSA on short- and mid-term outcomes after TAVI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective, observational study consisted of 917 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI at our center from 2011 to 2014. The association between BMI/BSA and mortality (at 30 days and 1 year) was assessed using restricted cubic spline functions in propensity-adjusted (by Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk factors) logistic and Cox proportional models, respectively. The median age of the patients was 82.6 years, with a mean STS Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) of 6.6 ± 4.3 %. Throughout the study period (mean follow-up time was 297 days), 150 (16.4 %) patients died; 72 (7.9 %) patients died within 30 days of TAVI. After risk adjustment, the association between body constitution and 30-day mortality was not significant for either measure (BMI p = 0.25; BSA p = 0.32). However, BMI (p = 0.01), but not BSA (p = 0.13), was significantly associated with 1-year survival. There was no association between stroke, vascular complications, or length of stay with BMI or BSA.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI was associated with survival at 1-year after TAVI. Despite the trend towards implementing BSA in risk score calculation, BMI may be more suitable for the assessment of TAVI patients.

"Dual role" guiding catheter: a new technique for patients requiring coronary protection during transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Coronary occlusion is a life-threatening complication during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) that requires immediate revascularization. Conventionally, a total of 3 catheters are required to protect the coronary ostia during TAVI: a pigtail catheter for the angiographic evaluation of valve positioning, a guiding catheter, and a TAVI delivery system. In this case series, we present a new, simplified technique for patients who require coronary protection during TAVI using a total of only 2 catheters: a guiding catheter and TAVI delivery system. This simplified technique results in a simpler procedure and reduces vascular complications in this high-risk cohort.

Effect of body mass index <20 kg/m(2) on events in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement

The Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 has defined body mass index (BMI) <20 as indicative of frailty, which may be one of the co-morbidities not captured by traditional risk factors after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study aimed to assess the impact of low BMI on clinical outcomes after TAVR. A total of 777 consecutive patients scheduled for TAVR were classified into 3 groups as BMI <20 (n = 56), 20 to 24.9 (n = 322), and ≥25 (n = 399). Procedural complications and clinical outcomes were compared among the 3 groups. They were also analyzed according to propensity-matching model A (BMI <20 [n = 50] vs ≥20 [n = 50]), model B (BMI <20 [n = 50] vs 20 to 24.9 [n = 50]), and model C (BMI <20 [n = 47] vs ≥25 [n = 47]). The differences in baseline characteristics among the 3 groups were adequately adjusted in 3 matched models. Valve Academic Research Consortium-2-defined end points and other complications were similar among the 3 groups in each model. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated no significant differences in cumulative 30-day survival (BMI <20 [91.0%] vs 20 to 24.9 [86.3%], p = 0.33; BMI <20 [91.0%] vs ≥25 [91.4%], p = 0.91, respectively) and 1-year survival (BMI <20 [74.3%] vs 20 to 24.9 [71.8%], p = 0.71; BMI <20 [74.3%] vs ≥25 [77.0%], p = 0.71; respectively). These survival rates were also similar in each of the 3 matched models. In conclusion, BMI <20 was not associated with increased early or midterm mortality. BMI <20 alone may not constitute an additional co-morbidity factor in patients who underwent TAVR.

Thirty-day outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the edwards SAPIEN XT prosthesis via the transiliofemoral approach

BACKGROUND

Few data exist on the results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) via the transfemoral approach in small slightly built Japanese patients with severe aortic stenosis who are ineligible or at high-risk for conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Therefore, the purpose was to investigate the early outcomes of TAVI using the transiliofemoral approach in Japan.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between June 2010 and June 2013, 21 consecutive patients (mean age, 81.0 years; 81.0% female) underwent TAVI with Edwards SAPIEN XT valves using the transiliofemoral approach. The mean body surface area was 1.44±0.15m(2). The device success rate was 90.5%. Although 2 patients did not meet the echocardiographic criteria for device success, no failure to deliver and deploy a valve occurred. The mean effective aortic valve area increased from 0.54±0.12cm(2) at baseline to 1.46±0.29cm(2) after the procedure (P<0.001), and the mean aortic transvalvular pressure gradient decreased from 51.0±15.6 at baseline to 11.2±3.6 after the procedure (P<0.001). The 30-day mortality and combined safety endpoint rates were 0% and 4.8%, respectively. All patients achieved New York Heart Association functional class I or II at 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Early outcome of TAVI with the Edwards-SAPIEN XT valve via the transiliofemoral approach at Kurashiki Central Hospital is satisfactory for patients who are ineligible or at high risk for SAVR.