Outcomes of urgent/emergent transcatheter mitral valve repair (MitraClip): A single center experience

Management of acute decompensated valvular heart disease

Worldwide, valvular heart disease (VHD) is a common cause of hospitalization for acute heart failure. In acute heart failure caused by VHD, symptoms result from rapid haemodynamic changes and subsequent decline in cardiac function, and if left untreated, leads to acute decompensation and cardiogenic shock. Current evidence remains scarce and recommendations regarding the management of acute heart failure caused by VHD are lacking in most recent international guidelines. Herein, we review the management of acute heart failure caused by VHD with a focus on transcatheter therapies and describe currently available evidence based on a systematic literature search on the following valve pathologies: (i) aortic stenosis, (ii) aortic regurgitation, (iii) mitral regurgitation, and (iv) mitral stenosis. Articles reporting outcomes following urgent or emergent valve intervention in the setting of cardiogenic shock or acute heart failure were considered. After screening a total of 2234 articles, 76 published between 1994 and 2023 were included in subsequent analysis. Based on available evidence, proposed treatment algorithms to guide optimal management of acute heart failure caused by VHD were created. As the number of patients presenting with acute heart failure caused by VHD continues to rise and outcomes following transcatheter valve interventions continue to improve, it is inevitable that minimally invasive options will play an increasingly important role in the acute setting, especially given these patients are at an increased operative risk. This review aims to present an organized approach to the complex management and interventional treatment of patients with acute heart failure caused by VHD.

Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Severe Mitral Regurgitation in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe mitral regurgitation and cardiogenic shock demonstrate a poor prognosis. Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair could alter patient management.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We systematically reviewed PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Library until January 2023, including studies assessing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in patients with severe mitral regurgitation and cardiogenic shock. Studies with <5 patients were excluded. The primary outcome was device success and all-cause death, while secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization rates at 30-day and intermediate-term follow-up. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled rates. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A total of 24 studies and 5428 patients were included, with a mean age of 71.2±3.3 years and a high mean Society of Thoracic Surgery score (15.2±8.9). Device success was achieved in 86% (95% CI, 85%-87%) and mitral regurgitation ≤2+ in 89% (95% CI: 88%-90%). The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 14% (95% CI, 13%-15%). Stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure hospitalization rates were 2% (95% CI, 1%-2%), 15% (95% CI, 13%-18%), and 9% (95% CI, 8%-10%), respectively. Patients with acute myocardial infarction had similar device success (81% [95% CI, 74%-87%]), a 30-day mortality rate of 20% (95% CI, 16%-25%), and intermediate-term mortality rate of 14% (95% CI, 9%-19%). In non-myocardial infarction populations, the 30-day mortality rate was 13% (95% CI, 13%-14%), and the intermediate-term mortality rate was 35% (95% CI, 34%-36%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mitral regurgitation and cardiogenic shock, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair is associated with favorable 30-day and intermediate-term outcomes. Limitations, including the observational design of included studies and considerable heterogeneity, necessitate further research in this setting.

MitraClip Procedure in Advanced Heart Failure and Severe Mitral Regurgitation: Case Report and Literature Review

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common valvular disorder often seen in a severely dilated left ventricle (LV) and reduced LV function. In chronic heart failure (HF), severe functional MR increases preload, wall tension, LV workload, and worsening prognosis. The MitraClip device offers a percutaneous treatment option in HF, although its safety and efficacy in advanced and acute HF remain a gray zone. We present a successful case of the emergent MitraClip intervention in a patient with advanced HF and review the relevant literature.

Outcomes of mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for patients with hemodynamic instability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The outcomes after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) for the patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in hemodynamically unstable conditions, such as cardiogenic shock, still remain unclear. We aimed to integrate previous publications regarding M-TEER indicated for life-threatening conditions and indirectly particularly compared the short-term outcomes thereof, with that of other treatments.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane, and MEDLINE databases for studies from inception to June 2023, regarding M-TEER in patients with hemodynamic instability and severe MR. The primary outcomes analyzed included the in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates, and peri-procedural complications.

RESULTS

Of the initial 820 publications, we conducted a meta-analysis of a total of 25 studies. The relative risk of moderate-to-severe or severe MR was 0.13 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-0.18, I2 = 45.2 %). The pooled in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 11.8 % (95 % CI: 8.7-15.9, I2 = 96.4 %) and 14.1 % (95 % CI: 10.9-18.3, I2 = 35.5 %), respectively. The 30-day mortality rate was statistically significantly correlated with the residual moderate-to-severe or severe MR, as per the meta-regression analysis (coefficient β = 3.48 [95 % CI: 0.99-5.97], p = 0.006). Regarding peri-procedural complications, the pooled rates of a stroke or transient ischemic attack, life-threatening or major bleeding, acute kidney injury, and peri-procedural mitral valve surgery were 2.3 % (95 % CI: 1.9-2.6), 7.6 % (95 % CI: 6.8-8.5), 32.9 % (95 % CI: 31.6-34.3), and 1.0 % (95 % CI: 0.8-1.3), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that the relatively higher rates of procedural complications were observed, nevertheless, M-TEER can potentially provide favorable short-term outcomes even in hemodynamically unstable patients.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023468946.

Derivation and Validation of Risk Prediction Model for 30-Day Readmissions Following Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair

Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) has shown to reduce heart failure (HF) rehospitalization and all cause mortality. However, the 30-day all-cause readmission remains high (∼15%) after TMVr. Therefore, we sought to develop and validate a 30-day readmission risk calculator for TMVr. Nationwide Readmission Database from January 2014 to December 2017 was utilized. A linear calculator was developed to determine the probability for 30-day readmission. Internal calibration with bootstrapped calculations was conducted to assess model accuracy. The root mean square error and mean absolute error were calculated to determine model performance. Of 8339 patients who underwent TMVr, 1246 (14.2%) were readmitted within 30 days. The final 30-day readmission risk prediction tool included the following variables: Heart failure, Atrial Fibrillation, Anemia, length of stay ≥4 days, Acute kidney injury (AKI), and Non-Home discharge, Non-Elective admission and Bleeding/Transfusion. The c-statistic of the prediction model was 0.63. The validation c-statistic for readmission risk tool was 0.628. On internal calibration, our tool was extremely accurate in predicting readmissions up to 20%. A simple and easy to use risk prediction tool identifies TMVr patients at increased risk of 30-day readmissions. The tool can guide in optimal discharge planning and reduce resource utilization.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in patients with mitral regurgitation and cardiogenic shock: a new therapeutic target

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiogenic shock with significant mitral regurgitation portends a poor prognosis with limited therapeutic options. Herein, we review the available evidence regarding the patient characteristics, management, impact of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) on hemodynamics, and clinical outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock and mitral regurgitation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several observational studies and systematic reviews have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of TEER in cardiogenic shock complicated by degenerative or functional mitral regurgitation. Surgical interventions for mitral regurgitation remain limited owing to the risk profile of patients in cardiogenic shock. TEER has been studied in both degenerative and functional mitral regurgitation and remains feasible in the critically ill population. Moreover, TEER is associated with reduction in mitral regurgitation and improvement in-hospital and long-term mortality.

SUMMARY

TEER remains a promising therapeutic option in cardiogenic shock complicated by significant mitral regurgitation, but additional research is required to identify patient and procedural characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, and the optimal time for intervention. Moreover, future randomized controlled trials are in progress to evaluate the potential benefit of TEER against medical management in cardiogenic shock and mitral regurgitation.

Percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip device in hemodynamically unstable patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Very few data exist on percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVr) in unstable patients with concomitant moderate-severe mitral regurgitation (MR). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate baseline characteristics, management and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients undergoing PMVr with MitraClip.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the published data on MitraClip from its first use in 2003 to December 2020. Studies referring to critically ill patients in cardiogenic shock or acute refractory pulmonary edema were included. A total of 40 publications including 254 patients with significant MR (Grade 4 in 91%) were included.

RESULTS

Mean age was 70 ± 12 years with mean Euroscore II and STS of 21 ± 13 and 20.5 ± 16, respectively. Clinical presentation was with cardiogenic shock and acute myocardial infarction in 72.8 and 60.0% of patients, respectively. Device success was achieved in 238 (93.7%) patients with a significant reduction in MR (Grade ≤ 2 in 91.8%, p < .001). The median weaning time from the procedure, to discontinuation of mechanical circulatory or respiratory support, was 2 days (IQR 1-4), with an in-hospital mortality and non-fatal complication rate of 12.6 and 9.1%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves estimated an overall mortality rate of 39.1% at 12-month follow-up, with persistent reduction in MR severity for survivors (Grade ≤ 2 in 81.3%) and one case of mitral valve reintervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip device is a technically feasible and potentially viable management option in high-risk patients with cardiogenic shock or refractory pulmonary edema and concomitant moderate-severe MR. Prospective trials are required to confirm these findings, and definitively determine the value of MitraClip in hemodynamically unstable patients.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Cardiogenic Shock and Mitral Regurgitation: A Patient-Level, Multicenter Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) in patients with cardiogenic shock and significant mitral regurgitation (MR).

BACKGROUND

Patients in cardiogenic shock with severe MR have a poor prognosis in the setting of conventional medical therapy. Because of its favorable safety profile, TMVr is being increasingly used as an acute therapy in this population, though its efficacy remains unknown.

METHODS

A multicenter, collaborative, patient-level analysis was conducted. Patients with cardiogenic shock and moderate to severe (3+) or severe (4+) MR who were not surgical candidates were treated with TMVr. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and the combined event rate of 90-day mortality and HF hospitalization following dichotomization by TMVr device success.

RESULTS

Between January 2011 and February 2019, 141 patients across 14 institutions met the inclusion criteria. In-hospital mortality occurred in 22 patients (15.6%), at 90 days in 38 patients (29.5%), and at one year in 55 patients (42.6%). Median length of hospital stay following TMVr was 10 days (interquartile range: 6 to 20 days). HF hospitalization occurred in 26 patients (18.4%) at a median of 73 days (interquartile range: 26 to 546 days). When stratified by TMVr procedural results, successful TMVr reduced rates of in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13 to 0.98; p = 0.04), 90-day mortality (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.78; p = 0.01), and the composite of 90-day mortality and HF hospitalization (HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.90; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

TMVr may improve short- and intermediate-term mortality in high-risk patients with cardiogenic shock and moderate to severe MR. Randomized studies are needed to definitively establish MR as a therapeutic target in patients with cardiogenic shock.