Effectiveness and safety of same day discharge after left atrial appendage closure under moderate conscious sedation

Safety and Clinical Outcomes of a Complete "Minimalist" Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Pathway

The standard approach to catheter based left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) involves trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) guided screening and placement, and procedural general anesthesia requiring overnight stay. In pursuit of improved patient experience and reduced cost, streamlined approaches in each phase of care have been explored. However, the safety and clinical outcomes for a completely protocolized minimalist approach utilizing computed tomography angiogram (CTA), intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), conscious sedation, and same-day discharge are lacking. We retrospectively studied 179 patients undergoing LAAO for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation using a novel "Minimalist" pathway. Efficacy and safety endpoints included stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding requiring transfusion, pericardial effusion, vascular complication, or death through 7 or 45 days post-procedure. The procedural success rate in Minimalist cases was 100%. A total of 159 patients (88.8%) were eligible for SDD. All patients survived to 45 days of follow up and there was a 0% incidence of stroke, systemic embolism, and vascular complications. There were low rates of DRT (1.3%) and peri-device flow (0.7%), yielding a high rate of safe OAC discontinuation. Using a pre-defined Minimalist pathway, eligible patients demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes comparable to those reported in national clinical registries, supporting use of our novel pathway to safely improve both patient experience and efficiency of care.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using a modified single-operator-technician approach under deep sedation: A single-center experience

Background

Historically, percutaneous transcatheter left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has been performed under general anesthesia (GA) with transesophageal echocardiographic images obtained by a noninvasive cardiologist and usually requires an overnight hospital stay. Alternatively, we present our single-center experience performing LAACs under deep sedation (DS), employing an echocardiographic technician instead of a noninvasive cardiologist, and expediting same-day discharge. Mid- to long-term outcomes were also evaluated with follow-up imaging at a 45-day visit.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of our single-operator-technician LAAC approach.

Methods

A total of 150 patients, with elevated CHA2DS2-VASc scores (a mean of 4 points), underwent transesophageal echocardiography-guided LAAC using the WATCHMAN FLX (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) device under DS.

Results

The mean age of patients was 78 years. Seventy-six (51%) were men. One hundred forty-seven patients (98%) had the LAAC device successfully implanted, and 145 (97%) were discharged on the same day. Nine patients (6%) required conversion from DS to GA. Only 5 patients (4%) had complications during the procedure. None of the patients died or had complications from DS. During the 45-day follow-up visit, one patient had a significant peridevice leak (maximum diameter ≥ 5 mm) and another patient had device-related thrombosis.

Conclusion

Our novel single-operator-technician approach under DS is safe and feasible. Implementing protocols to simplify the traditional 2-operator approach under GA by using DS and an echocardiography technician as well as incorporating same-day discharge could make LAACs more widely available and potentially reduce procedural costs.

Impact of moderate sedation on electrophysiology lab time for left atrial appendage occlusion using 4D-intracardiac echocardiography

INTRODUCTION

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) can be performed using diverse anesthetic approaches ranging from moderate sedation (MS) to general anesthesia (GA), and guided by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Prior studies have demonstrated shorter time in lab for heart rhythm procedures performed under MS. The objective of this study was to compare laboratory times, acute procedural outcomes and complication rates for LAAO procedures performed using MS and 4-dimensional ICE as opposed to GA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a retrospective observational cohort study of 135 consecutive patients who were referred for LAAO to be performed with either GA or MS between June 2022 and April 2024. The primary endpoints were total laboratory time, procedure time, nonprocedure time, and fluoroscopy time. The secondary endpoints were stroke, peri-device leak (>5 mm), device-related left atrial thrombus, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality at 45 days and 6 months postprocedure, where data were available. The mean age of patients in the study was 78.8 ± 7.8 years and 64.4% were male with no difference between GA and MS. In the MS group, 4D-ICE was used for intraprocedural imaging in 95.5% of patients and 2 dimensional-ICE (2D-ICE) was used in 4.5% of patients. In the GA group, intra-procedural imaging was done using TEE in 51.5%, 2D-ICE in 32.4% and 4D-ICE in 16.2% of cases. Total laboratory time was significantly lower in the MS group compared to the GA group (68.3 ± 23.1 vs 117.1 ± 34.3 min; p < 0.001), due to shorter nonprocedure time (15.2 ± 9.1 vs 63.7 ± 22.0 min; p < 0.001), with no significant difference in procedure time and fluoroscopy time. There was no significant difference in complications at 45 days and 6 months postprocedure.

CONCLUSION

In this single center study, MS reduced total lab time by reducing nonprocedure time when compared to GA for LAAO, without affecting clinical outcomes.

Single-Operator Left atrial appendage Occlusion utilizing Conscious sedation TEE, Lack of Outpatient pre-imaging, and Same-day Expedited discharge (SOLO-CLOSE): A comparison with conventional approach

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with WATCHMAN currently requires preprocedural imaging, general anesthesia, and inpatient overnight admission. We sought to facilitate simplification of LAAO.

AIMS

We describe and compare SOLO-CLOSE (single-operator LAA occlusion utilizing conscious sedation TEE, lack of outpatient pre-imaging, and same-day expedited discharge) with the conventional approach (CA).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective analysis of 163 patients undergoing LAAO between January 2017 and April 2022 was conducted. The SOLO-CLOSE protocol was enacted on December 1, 2020. Before this date, we utilized the CA. The primary efficacy endpoint was defined as successful LAAO with ≤5 mm peri-device leak at time of closure. The primary safety endpoint was the composite incidence of all-cause deaths, any cerebrovascular accident (CVA), device embolization, pericardial effusion, or major postprocedure bleeding within 7 days of the index procedure. Procedure times, 7-day readmission rates, and cost analytics were collected as well.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar in both cohorts. Congestive heart failure (37.5% vs. 11.1%) and malignancy (28.8% vs. 12.5%) were higher in SOLO-CLOSE. Median CHA2D2SVASc score was 5 in both cohorts. The primary efficacy endpoint was met 100% in both cohorts. Primary safety endpoint was similar between cohorts (p = 0.078). Mean procedure time was 30 min shorter in SOLO-CLOSE (p < 0.01). Seven-day readmissions for SOLO-CLOSE was zero. After SOLO-CLOSE implementation, there was a 188% increase in positive contribution margin per case.

CONCLUSIONS

The SOLO-CLOSE methodology offers similar efficacy and safety when compared to the CA, while improving clinical efficiency, reducing procedural times, and increasing economic benefit.

Clinical Protocol for Selecting Intracardiac or Transesophageal Echocardiography-Guided Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has emerged as an alternative to transesophageal echo (TEE) to guide left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). We established a protocol to select patients appropriate for ICE guidance. Patients who underwent LAAO with the Watchman or Watchman FLX device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) from January 2018 to March 2022 at a large United States center were included. The novel protocol prospectively selected TEE or ICE guidance beginning in January 2020; previous LAAO procedures were retrospectively included. ICE was selected for patients with uninterrupted anticoagulation and appropriate LAA anatomy, renal function, and moderate sedation tolerance. In-hospital outcomes with successful implantation without conversion to TEE guidance, no peridevice leak, and no procedural complications were compared. Composite 1-year outcome included freedom from peridevice leak, device-related thrombus, stroke, and all-cause mortality. A total of 234 patients were included; the mean age was 76.1 ± 8.3 years old, and 42.3% were female. ICE guidance was used for 63 procedures; TEE guidance was used for 171 procedures. For the composite outcome, ICE-guided LAAO was superior to TEE-guided LAAO (risk difference 0.102, 96.8% vs 86.5%, 95% confidence interval 0.003 to 0.203, p = 0.029). In comparison to the TEE-guided group, ICE-guided procedures were shorter (89.1 ± 26.3 vs 99.8 ± 30.0 min, p = 0.0087) with less general anesthesia (26.6% vs 98.8%, p <0.0001). One-year composite adverse outcomes did not differ significantly (80.7% vs 88.9%, p = 0.17). In conclusion, the protocol to select appropriate patients for ICE versus TEE guidance for LAAO is safe and effective. Larger studies are indicated to validate this approach to improve outcomes, shorten procedures, and avoid general anesthesia.

Anesthetic Choice for Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage: A National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry Analysis

CONTEXT

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) was developed as a novel stroke prevention alternative for patients with atrial fibrillation, particularly for those not suitable for long-term oral anticoagulant therapy. Traditionally, general anesthesia (GA) has been more commonly used primarily due to the necessity of transesophageal echocardiography.

AIMS

Compare trends of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) versus GA for percutaneous transcatheter LAAC with endocardial implant and assess for independent variables associated with primary anesthetic choice.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Multi-institutional data collected from across the United States using the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective data analysis from 2017-2021.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Independent-sample t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests were used for continuous variables and Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess patient and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 19,395 patients underwent the procedure, and 352 patients (1.8%) received MAC. MAC usage trended upward from 2017-2021 (P < 0.0001). MAC patients were more likely to have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of≥ 4 (33.6% vs 22.89%) and to have been treated at centers in the South (67.7% vs 44.2%), in rural locations (71% vs 39.5%), and with lower median annual percutaneous transcatheter LAAC volume (102 vs 153 procedures) (all P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, patients treated in the West had 85% lower odds of receiving MAC compared to those in the Northeast (AOR: 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.80, P = 0.0261).

CONCLUSIONS

While GA is the most common anesthetic technique for percutaneous transcatheter closure of the left atrial appendage, a small, statistically significant increase in MAC occurred from 2017-2021. Anesthetic management for LAAC varies with geographic location.

Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Left-Atrial Appendage Occlusion with Conscious Sedation without an Anesthesiologist on Site: Results from a Multicenter Study

Background and Objectives: Percutaneous left-atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is an important therapeutic option for preventing cardioembolic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) at high risk of thromboembolic events and with contraindications for oral anticoagulation (OAC). It is usually performed with transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) guidance under general anesthesia (GA). In this retrospective study, we present a multicenter experience of LAA occlusion performed with conscious sedation (CS) without an anesthesiologist on site. Materials and Methods: All the patients on the waiting list for LAA occlusion procedure at Infermi Hospital, Rivoli, and San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano, from October 2018 to October 2022 were analyzed. All the procedures were performed with a Watchman/FLX LAA closure device under TOE and fluoroscopic guidance without an anesthesiologist on site. CS was performed with a combination of midazolam and fentanyl as needed. Results: One-hundred fifteen patients were included (age 76.4 ± 7.6 years, median CHA2DS2Vasc 4.4 ± 1.4). CS was performed using midazolam (mean dose 5.9 ± 2.1 mg), adding fentanyl for thirty-nine (33.9%) patients in case of poor tolerance for the procedure despite midazolam. The acute procedural success rate was 99.1%. We observed seven acute severe complications. No patients needed anesthesiological assistance during the procedure, and no cases of respiratory failure necessitating ventilation were reported. In a follow-up after 10 ± 9 months, one case of stroke (0.9%) and one case (0.9%) of transient ischemic attack (TIA) occurred. Conclusions: LAA occlusion performed under CS and without the presence of an anesthesiologist on site appears to be safe and effective. It can be an attractive alternative to general anesthesia (GA), as fewer resources are required.

Single-operator left atrial appendage occlusion utilizing conscious sedation, transoesophageal echocardiography, lack of outpatient pre-imaging, and same-day expedited discharge: a feasibility case series

BACKGROUND

Contemporary procedural guidelines for percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusions (LAAO) with the WATCHMAN device often require the utilization of pre-screening imaging, general anaesthesia, intubation, a dedicated intra-procedural echocardiographer, and overnight observation. For these reasons, LAAO with the WATCHMAN is not economically feasible for many hospital systems. Thus, we sought to evaluate a newstrategy for implantation that may provide a more minimalistic and less cumbersome approach to LAAO.

CASE SUMMARY

We describe five cases utilizing single-operator left atrial appendage occlusion utilizing conscious sedation, transoesophageal echocardiography, lack of outpatient pre-imaging, and same-day expedited discharge (SOLO-CLOSE)-a novel single-operator procedural strategy for LAAO that safely foregoes the aforementioned procedural requirements and allows for same-day early discharge. All five patients were observed according to our newly devised SOLO-CLOSE protocol and were safely discharged home the same day. Follow-up transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at 45 days and 1 year revealed well-seated and well-anchored devices with no leaks (<5 mm) or device-related thrombi.

DISCUSSION

The SOLO-CLOSE series is the first ever documented WATCHMAN strategy that utilizes a single-operator, TEE-guided, nurse-driven conscious sedation protocol that defers pre-screening imaging and allows for same-day discharge. The versatility of this technique allows proceduralists to comfortably achieve successful LAAO despite a wide range of risk profiles. This single-operator technique has potential to become a widely accepted universal approach for non-pharmacological cardioembolic stroke prophylaxis due to its efficacy, safety, simplicity, and presumable cost-effectiveness.

Same-Day Discharge After Elective Percutaneous Transcatheter Cardiovascular Interventions

Percutaneous transcatheter interventions have evolved as standard therapies for a variety of cardiovascular diseases, from revascularization for atherosclerotic vascular lesions to the treatment of structural cardiac diseases. Concomitant technological innovations, procedural advancements, and operator experience have contributed to effective therapies with low complication rates, making early hospital discharge safe and common. Same-day discharge presents numerous potential benefits for patients, providers, and health care systems. There are several key elements that are shared across the spectrum of interventional cardiology procedures to create a successful same-day discharge pathway. These include appropriate patient and procedure selection, close postprocedural observation, predischarge assessments specific for each type of procedure, and the existence of a patient support system beyond hospital discharge. This review provides the rationale, available data, and a framework for same-day discharge across the spectrum of coronary, peripheral, and structural cardiovascular interventions.

Same-day discharge for left atrial appendage occlusion procedure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Most patients undergoing a left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedure are admitted for overnight observation. A same-day discharge strategy offers the opportunity to improve resource utilization without compromising patient safety. We compared the patient safety outcomes and post-discharge complications between same-day discharge versus hospital admission (HA) (>1 day) in patients undergoing LAAO procedure.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase was conducted. Outcomes of interest included peri-procedural complications, re-admissions, discharge complications including major bleeding and vascular complications, ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, and peri-device leak >5 mm. Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of seven observational studies met the inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference between same-day discharge versus HA regarding readmission (RR: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.29-1.31]; p = .21), ischemic stroke after discharge (RR: 1.16; 95% CI: [0.49-2.73]), peri-device leak >5 mm (RR: 1.27; 95% CI: [0.42-3.85], and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.60; 95% CI: [0.36-1.02]). The same-day discharge study group had significantly lower major bleeding or vascular complications (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: [0.54-0.94]).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis of seven observational studies showed no significant difference in patient safety outcomes and post-discharge complications between same-day discharge versus HA. These findings provide a solid basis to perform a randomized control trial to eliminate any potential confounders.

National Trends of Structural Heart Disease Interventions from 2016 to 2020 in the United States and the Associated Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic

The Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic placed an enormous strain on the healthcare system. Data on the impact of COVID-19 on the utilization and outcomes of structural heart disease interventions in the United States are scarce. The National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020 was queried to identify adult admissions for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO), and transcatheter end-to-end repair (TEER). The primary outcome was temporal trends of procedure utilization rate per 100,000 admissions over quarters from 2016 to 2020. The secondary outcomes were adjusted rates of in-hospital mortality, major complications, and length of stay (LOS). Among 434,630 weighted admissions (TAVR: 305,550; LAAO: 89,300; TEER: 40,160), 95,010 admissions (22%) were during the COVID-19 era. There was a decline during the second quarter of 2020 followed by an increase to the pre pandemic levels (TAVR: 220 to 253, LAAO: 57 to 109, and TEER: 31 to 36 per 100,000 admissions, Ptrend<0.001). There were no differences in the mortality or major complication rates. Median LOS has decreased in TAVR (4 days-1 day) and in TEER (3 days-1 day) but remained stable in LAAO (1 day). This nationwide analysis showed that structural heart disease interventions decreased during the early waves of COVID-19 pandemic. There was a significant reduction in hospital LOS without differences in in-hospital mortality or complication rates during the pandemic. These data suggest that hospitals adapted to the unprecedent challenges during the pandemic to provide advanced cardiac care to patients.

Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Most centers performing catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) admit the patients for an overnight hospital stay to monitor for post-procedure complications, but the clinical benefits of this overnight hospital admission policy have not been carefully investigated. We hypothesized that same-day discharge strategy is safe and feasible in patients with AF undergoing CA.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies comparing the safety of same-day discharge vs hospital admission for AF patients undergoing CA was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. No randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria; therefore, observational cohort studies were included. Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios were calculated and I² statistics were reported for heterogeneity assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 8 observational studies with 10,102 patients were included. There were no statistically significant differences between same-day discharge vs hospital admission in all studied outcomes including post-discharge 30-day hospital visits (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.40-2.02; p = 0.81), post-discharge vascular/bleeding complications (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.46-1.88; p = 0.85), post-discharge stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.23-2.20; p = 0.55), and post-discharge recurrent arrhythmias (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.60-1.09; p = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

In carefully selected AF patients undergoing CA, same-day discharge strategy is feasible and safe. There are no significant differences in post-discharge 30-day hospital visits, post-discharge vascular complications, and other safety outcomes. Randomized trials are needed to validate these hypothesis-generating findings.

Predictors of successful same-day discharge and 1-year outcomes after left atrial appendage closure

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge (SDD) following left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is increasingly common but predictors of successful SDD and 1-year clinical outcomes have not been described.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to explore predictors of successful SDD and report 1-year outcomes in patients undergoing LAAC with SDD.

METHODS

A prospective analysis was performed over a 20-month period of 225 consecutive patients that underwent LAAC in a large, academic hospital. All patients included in the study underwent a SDD protocol. Baseline characteristics and 1-year outcomes of patients discharged same day of the procedure versus those that required at least one overnight stay were compared. Adverse events, procedural success, and procedure times were evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-one patients (72%) of patients were discharged the same day and 64 patients (28%) required at least an overnight stay (non-SDD: NSDD). NSDD patients were older and more often female. Procedure time was also longer in the NSDD group than in the SDD (63.4 vs. 55.1 min; p = 0.01). While overall procedural success rates were similar between the SDD and NSDD groups (99.4% vs. 98.4%; p = 0.39), NSDD patients had more complications (9.4% vs. 0%; p = 0.01) and higher number of devices per procedure (1.2 vs. 1.0; p = 0.01) as compared to SDD. At 1 year, there were no significant difference between the SDD and NSDD groups in stroke (1.1% vs. 0%; log-rank p = 0.44) and all-cause mortality (3.9% vs. 4.7%; log-rank p = 0.70).

CONCLUSION

In this single-center LAAC experience, female sex, older age, and longer procedure duration were associated with higher likelihood for need of overnight stay. At 1-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in stroke events and death rates between SDD and NSDD groups.

Thirty-day readmission rate of same-day discharge protocol after left atrial appendage occlusion: A propensity score-matched analysis from the National Readmission Database

BACKGROUND

Given the reduction in periprocedural complication rates, same-day discharge (SDD) after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) could be beneficial. To date, little data exist comparing the standard overnight stay (ONS) vs SDD after LAAC.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of SDD compared with ONS.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of LAAC procedures performed in the United States from 2015 to 2019 was conducted using the US Nationwide Readmission Database. The primary outcome was all-cause 30-day readmission after discharge in patients who underwent LAAC, and a secondary outcome was requiring total health care cost. A 1:1 propensity score matching was conducted for adjustment. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was also performed to estimate the hazard ratio for all-cause readmission within 30 days of LAAC.

RESULTS

Of 48,953 patients (mean age 76.0 ± 7.9 years), 972 patients (1.99%) were discharged on the same day after LAAC (SDD group) and the remaining 47,981 patients stayed at least 1 night (ONS group). A propensity score-matched analysis generated 961 matched pairs in each group. The 30-day readmission rate after discharge was similar between the groups (SDD vs ONS: 8.5% vs 9.8%; P = .31; hazard ratio 1.13; 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.63; P = .53). The total required health care cost was significantly lower in the SDD group ($23,720 [$18,075-$29,416] vs $25,877 [$19,906-$32,748]; P < .01). Gastrointestinal bleeding was the major cause for readmission (SDD vs ONS: 14.7% vs 15.1%; P = .95), but stroke and pericardial effusion were rare.

CONCLUSION

In patients without procedure-related complications, SDD is a safe and cost-effective protocol.

Same day discharge after structural heart disease interventions in the era of the coronavirus-19 pandemic and beyond

With recent advancements in imaging modalities and techniques and increased recognition of the long-term impact of several structural heart disease interventions, the number of procedures has significantly increased. With the increase in procedures, also comes an increase in cost. In view of this, efficient and cost-effective methods to facilitate and manage structural heart disease interventions are a necessity. Same-day discharge (SDD) after invasive cardiac procedures improves resource utilization and patient satisfaction. SDD in appropriately selected patients has become the standard of care for some invasive cardiac procedures such as percutaneous coronary interventions. This is not the case for the majority of structural heart procedures. With the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, safely reducing the duration of time spent within the hospital to prevent unnecessary exposure to pathogens has become a priority. In light of this, it is prudent to assess the feasibility of SDD in several structural heart procedures. In this review we highlight the feasibility of SDD in a carefully selected population, by reviewing and summarizing studies on SDD among patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion, patent foramen ovale/atrial septal defect closure, Mitra-clip, and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement procedures.

Novel Computed Tomography Angiography-Based Sizing Methodology for WATCHMAN FLX Device in Left Atrial Appendage Closure

BACKGROUND

While there is recent data suggesting an advantage of Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) over transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for pre-procedural left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) planning, there is limited published experience for sizing strategies. Device sizing for LAAC may be challenging and non-invasive algorithms that improve this selection process are warranted.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the safety and the feasibility for the implementation of a novel CTA-based sizing methodology for WATCHMAN^™ FLX device in a series of patients undergoing LAAC using the TruPlan™ software package.

METHODS

A prospective analysis of 136 consecutive patients who underwent LAAC over a 12-month period in a single, large academic hospital in the United States was conducted. CTA-guided pre-procedural planning and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was performed in all. Procedural success, adverse events, length of procedure, number of devices used, and length of stay were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients who underwent LAAC procedure with WATCHMAN^™ FLX platform between October 1, 2020 until September 30, 2021 were included. The pre-specified protocol using CTA and ICE was implemented in all patients (100%). Mean CHA₂ DS₂ VASc score was 4.4 ± 1.3 and the mean HAS-BLED score was 3.9 ± 0.8. ICE-guided 100% transseptal puncture success rate was 100% with 98.5% of overall procedural success rate. Pre-procedural CTA sizing strategy accurately predicted the implanted size in 91.1% of patients. Ten patients (7.4%) required another sized device and 2 cases were aborted. At 45-day follow-up, only 1 patient (0.7%) had significant peri-device leak (≥ 5mm) on TEE.

CONCLUSIONS

CTA-based pre-procedural sizing methodology for WATCHMAN^™ FLX in LAAC was safe, feasible and associated with excellent procedural outcomes. Further studies are warranted to confirm if the features specific to TruPlan^™ may reduce the number of deployment attempts, the number of devices utilized in the procedure, and the risk of complications. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.