Integrated Product Separation in Bioelectrochemical CO2Reduction for Improved Process Efficiency

Microbial electrosynthesis of valuable chemicals from the reduction of CO2: a review

The present energy demand of the world is increasing but the fossil fuels are gradually depleting. As a result, the need for alternative fuels and energy sources is growing. Fuel cells could be one alternative to address the challenge. The fuel cell can convert CO2 to value-added chemicals. The potential of bio-fuel cells, specifically enzymatic fuel cells and microbial fuel cells, and the importance of immobilization technology in bio-fuel cells are highlighted. The review paper also includes a detailed explanation of the microbial electrosynthesis system to reduce CO2 and the value-added products during microbial electrosynthesis. Future research in bio-electrochemical synthesis for CO2 conversion is expected to prioritize enhancing biocatalyst efficiency, refining reactor design, exploring novel electrode materials, understanding microbial interactions, integrating renewable energy sources, and investigating electrochemical processes for carbon capture and selective CO2 reduction. The challenges and perspectives of bio-electrochemical systems in the application of CO2 conversion are also discussed. Overall, this review paper provides valuable insights into the latest developments and criteria for effective research and implementation in bio-fuel cells, immobilization technology, and microbial electro-synthesis systems.

The type of ion selective membrane determines stability and production levels of microbial electrosynthesis

Microbial electrosynthesis (MES) can enable electricity-driven bioproduction from CO₂. Several membrane types such as anion exchange, cation exchange, and bipolar membranes (AEM/CEM/BPM) can be used to separate the anodic oxidation from the biocathodic reduction. The impact of the membrane type on MES has not yet been studied. Therefore we compared the three membranes for MES of acetic acid. The reactor with AEM enabled in situ recovery of acetic acid. This extraction led to a 32% higher production rate and efficiency compared to the systems that did not include product recovery, as product inhibition was likely occurring. Besides H⁺/OH^-, mainly HCO₃^- contributed to charge balancing. Due to water displacement across the membrane, the product concentration in the AEM reactor (9g/L) did not exceed the concentration in the CEM reactor (10.5g/L). Overall this comparison shows that the membrane type in MES can be critical towards a stable and efficient process.