Organizational model and reactions to alerts in remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A survey from the Home Monitoring Expert Alliance project

Incidental and anticipated arrhythmic diagnoses in patients with an implantable cardiac monitor

AIMS

In this study, we investigated a cohort of unselected patients with various indications for an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM). Our main objectives were to determine the incidence of arrhythmic diagnoses, both anticipated and incidental in relation to the ICM indication, and to assess their clinical relevance.

METHODS

We examined remote monitoring transmissions from patients with an ICM at four Italian sites to identify occurrences of cardiac arrhythmias. Concurrently, we collected data on medical actions taken in response to arrhythmic findings.

RESULTS

The study included 119 patients, with a median follow-up period of 371 days. ICM indications were syncope/presyncope (46.2%), atrial fibrillation management (31.1%), and cryptogenic stroke (22.7%). In the atrial fibrillation management group, atrial fibrillation was the most common finding, with an incidence of 36% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22-55%] at 18 months. Rates of atrial fibrillation were not significantly different between patients with cryptogenic stroke and syncope/presyncope [17% (95% CI 7-40%) vs. 8% (95% CI 3-19%), P  = 0.229].For patients with cryptogenic stroke, the incidence of asystole and bradyarrhythmias at 18 months was 23% (95% CI 11-45%) and 42% (95% CI 24-65%), respectively, similar to estimates obtained for patients implanted for syncope/presyncope ( P  = 0.277 vs. P  = 0.836).Overall, 30 patients (25.2%) required medical intervention following ICM-detected arrhythmias, predominantly involving atrial fibrillation ablation (10.9%) and medication therapy changes (10.1%).

CONCLUSION

In a real-life population with heterogeneous insertion indications, approximately 25% of patients received ICM-guided medical interventions within a short timeframe, including treatments for incidental findings. Common incidental arrhythmic diagnoses were bradyarrhythmias in patients with cryptogenic stroke and atrial fibrillation in patients with unexplained syncope.

Device-detected atrial sensing amplitudes as a marker of increased risk for new onset and progression of atrial high-rate episodes

BACKGROUND

Atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) are frequent in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. A decrease in device-detected P-wave amplitude may be an indicator of periods of increased risk of AHRE.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the association between P-wave amplitude and AHRE incidence.

METHODS

Remote monitoring data from 2579 patients with no history of atrial fibrillation (23% pacemakers and 77% implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, of which 40% provided cardiac resynchronization therapy) were used to calculate the mean P-wave amplitude during 1 month after implantation. The association with AHRE incidence according to 4 strata of daily burden duration (≥15 minutes, ≥6 hours, ≥24 hours, ≥7 days) was investigated by adjusting the hazard ratio with the CHA2DS2-VASc score.

RESULTS

The adjusted hazard ratio for 1-mV lower mean P-wave amplitude during the first month increased from 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.15; P < .001) to 1.18 (CI, 1.09-1.28; P < .001) with AHRE duration strata from ≥15 minutes to ≥7 days independent of the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Of 871 patients with AHREs, those with 1-month P-wave amplitude <2.45 mV had an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.51 (CI, 1.19-1.91; P = .001) for progression of AHREs from ≥15 minutes to ≥7 days compared with those with 1-month P-wave amplitude ≥2.45 mV. Device-detected P-wave amplitudes decreased linearly during the 1 year before the first AHRE by 7.3% (CI, 5.1%-9.5%; P < .001 vs patients without AHRE).

CONCLUSION

Device-detected P-wave amplitudes <2.45 mV were associated with an increased risk of AHRE onset and progression to persistent forms of AHRE independent of the patient's risk profile.

Daily and automatic remote monitoring of implantable cardiac monitors: A descriptive analysis of transmitted episodes

BACKGROUND

Remote Monitoring (RM) is recognized for its ability to enhance the clinical management of patients with implantable cardiac monitor (ICM). This study aims to provide a comprehensive description of the arrhythmic episodes transmitted by a daily and automatic RM system from a cohort of ICM patients.

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed daily transmissions from consecutive patients who had been implanted with a long-sensing vector ICM (BIOMONITOR III/IIIm) at four sites. All transmitted arrhythmic recordings were evaluated to determine whether they were true positive episodes or false positives (FP).

RESULTS

A total of 14,136 episodes were transmitted from 119 patients (74.8% male, median age 62 years old) during a median follow-up of 371 days. The rate of arrhythmic episodes was 14.2 per patient-year (interquartile range: 1.8-126), with 97 patients (81.5%) experiencing at least one ICM activation. Fifty-five percent of episodes were identified as FP, and 67 patients (56.3%) had at least one inappropriate activation. The FP rate was 1.4 per patient-year (0-40). The best per-episode predictive positive values were observed for bradycardia and atrial fibrillation (0.595 and 0.553, respectively). Notably, the implementation of an algorithm designed to minimize false detections significantly reduced the prevalence of atrial fibrillation FP episodes (17.6% vs. 43.5%, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Daily and automatic RM appears to be a reliable tool for the comprehensive remote management of ICM patients. However, the number of arrhythmic episodes requiring review is high, and further improvements are needed to reduce FP and facilitate accurate interpretation of transmissions.

2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on practical management of the remote device clinic

Remote monitoring is beneficial for the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by impacting morbidity and mortality. With increasing numbers of patients using remote monitoring, keeping up with higher volume of remote monitoring transmissions creates challenges for device clinic staff. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide cardiac electrophysiologists, allied professionals, and hospital administrators in managing remote monitoring clinics. This includes guidance for remote monitoring clinic staffing, appropriate clinic workflows, patient education, and alert management. This expert consensus statement also addresses other topics such as communication of transmission results, use of third-party resources, manufacturer responsibilities, and programming concerns. The goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all aspects of remote monitoring services. Gaps in current knowledge and guidance for future research directions are also identified.

Real-life data on the workload of cardiac implantable electronic device remote monitoring in a large tertiary center

BACKGROUND

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) and implantable loop recorders (ILR) are increasingly monitored by systems allowing remote transmission of data from the patient to the hospital. Remote monitoring (RM) has been shown to increase patient satisfaction and safety. However, real-life data on the number and causes of the RM transmissions, and actions initiated by them are scarce.

METHODS

A total of 3446 patients with CIED and 92 patients with ILR were included in the study. Data on the number of alerts, scheduled and patient-initiated transmissions as well as the causes and actions initiated by the transmissions were systematically collected from March 1 to December 30, 2022. The data was subdivided by the device type.

RESULTS

During the study period 7087 remote CIED and 1212 ILR transmissions were generated, (0.2 and 1.3 per patient per month), respectively. Of these transmissions 49% (4084) were automatic alerts, and 29% (2434) and 22% (1781) were scheduled and patient initiated, respectively. Most of the CIED alerts (73%) and the scheduled transmissions (90%) were nonactionable, and only 7% and 5% led to in-office follow-up, respectively. Off all ILR alerts (1011) PM implantation was scheduled to 11 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

RM transmissions were common, but most of them were nonactionable. These real-life findings indicate that detailed analysis of the causes of the RM transmissions is important for optimization of the remote follow-up workload.

Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices and disease management

This reviews the transition of remote monitoring of patients with cardiac electronic implantable devices from curiosity to standard of care. This has been delivered by technology evolution from patient-activated remote interrogations at appointed intervals to continuous monitoring that automatically flags clinically actionable information to the clinic for review. This model has facilitated follow-up and received professional society recommendations. Additionally, continuous monitoring has provided a new level of granularity of diagnostic data enabling extension of patient management from device to disease management. This ushers in an era of digital medicine with wider applications in cardiovascular medicine.

2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic

Remote monitoring is beneficial for the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by impacting morbidity and mortality. With increasing numbers of patients using remote monitoring, keeping up with higher volume of remote monitoring transmissions creates challenges for device clinic staff. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide cardiac electrophysiologists, allied professionals, and hospital administrators in managing remote monitoring clinics. This includes guidance for remote monitoring clinic staffing, appropriate clinic workflows, patient education, and alert management. This expert consensus statement also addresses other topics such as communication of transmission results, use of third-party resources, manufacturer responsibilities, and programming concerns. The goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all aspects of remote monitoring services. Gaps in current knowledge and guidance for future research directions are also identified.

2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic

Remote monitoring is beneficial for the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by impacting morbidity and mortality. With increasing numbers of patients using remote monitoring, keeping up with higher volume of remote monitoring transmissions creates challenges for device clinic staff. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide cardiac electrophysiologists, allied professionals, and hospital administrators in managing remote monitoring clinics. This includes guidance for remote monitoring clinic staffing, appropriate clinic workflows, patient education, and alert management. This expert consensus statement also addresses other topics such as communication of transmission results, use of third-party resources, manufacturer responsibilities, and programming concerns. The goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all aspects of remote monitoring services. Gaps in current knowledge and guidance for future research directions are also identified.

HeartLogic™: real-world data-efficiency, resource consumption, and workflow optimization

Heart failure (HF) is a major and still growing medical problem and is characterized by episodes of acute decompensation that are associated with a negative prognosis and a significant burden on the patients, doctors, and healthcare resources. Early detection of incipient HF may allow outpatient treatment before patients severely decompensate, thus reducing HF hospitalizations and related costs. The HeartLogic™ algorithm is an automatic, remotely managed system combining data directly related to HF pathophysiology into a single score, the HeartLogic™ index. This index proved to be effective in predicting the risk of incipient HF decompensation, allowing to redistribute resources from low-risk to high-risk patients in a timely and cost-saving manner. The alert-based remote management system seems more efficient than the one based on scheduled remote transmission in terms of caregivers' workload and alert detection timing. The widespread application of the HeartLogic™ algorithm requires the resolution of logistical and financial issues and the adoption of a pre-defined, functional workflow. In this paper, we reviewed general aspects of remote monitoring in HF patients, the functioning and pathophysiological basis of the HeartLogic index, its efficiency in the management of HF patients, and the economic effects and the organizational revolution associated with its use.

HeartInsight: from SELENE HF to implementation in clinical practice

There is strong evidence that remote monitoring in cardiac implantable electronic devices can detect device malfunctions earlier than conventional monitoring and that it can be useful for detecting cardiac arrhythmias, while little data are available for an improved management of heart failure (HF). HeartInsight is a new remote monitoring algorithm developed and validated in the SELENE HF study that combines information from a diverse set of sensors integrated into one alert to detect worsening HF with promising accuracy. However, the shift from detecting technical issues or arrhythmia episodes to early predicting clinical events underscores the need to understand how to properly integrate these tools into the clinical workflow by defining an organizational model and shared guidelines for the management of HF alerts. Here, we critically discuss issues that will be raised by the implementation of this 'enhanced' remote monitoring approach to HF care in daily clinical practice.

Temporal association between drops in thoracic impedance and malignant ventricular arrhythmia: A longitudinal analysis of remote monitoring trends

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic impedance (TI) drops measured by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have been reported to correlate with ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF). The aim of our study was to assess the temporal association of decreasing TI trends with VT/VF episodes through a longitudinal analysis of daily remote monitoring data from ICDs and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Retrospective data from 2384 patients were randomized 1:1 into a derivation or validation cohort. The TI decrease rate was defined as the percentage of rolling weeks with a continuously decreasing TI trend. The derivation cohort was used to determine a TI decrease rate threshold for a ≥99% specificity of arrhythmia prediction. The associated risk of VT/VF episodes was estimated in the validation cohort by dividing the available follow-up into 60-day assessment intervals. Analyses were performed separately for 1354 ICD and 1030 CRT-D patients. During a median follow-up of 2.0 years, 727 patients (30.4%) experienced 3298 confirmed VT/VF episodes. In the ICD group, a TI decrease rate of >60% was associated with a higher risk of VT/VF episode in a 60-day assessment interval (stratified hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-1.92; p = .023). The TI decrease preceded (40.8%) or followed (59.2%) the VT/VF episodes. In the CRT-D group, no association between TI decrease and VT/VF episodes was observed (p = .84).

CONCLUSION

In our longitudinal analysis, TI decrease was associated with VT/VF episodes only in ICD patients. Preventive interventions may be difficult since episodes can occur before or after TI decrease.

Ventricular Arrhythmias and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Women: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Causes of sex differences in incidence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (SVAs) are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate sex-specific risk of SVAs and device therapies by balancing sex groups in relation to several baseline characteristics with the propensity score (PS).

METHODS

We used a large remote monitoring dataset from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds). Study endpoints were time to the first appropriate SVA, time to the first device therapy for SVA, and time to the first ICD shock. Results were compared between females and a PS-matched male subgroup.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 2,532 patients with an ICD or CRT-D (median age, 70 years), 488 patients (19.3%) were women. After selecting 488 men PS-matched for 19 variables relative to baseline demographics, implant indications, principal comorbidities, and concomitant therapy, yet the SVA rate at the 2.1-year median follow-up was significantly lower in women than in man (adjusted HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.51-0.81; P < 0.001). Women also showed a reduced risk of any device therapy (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.45-0.76; P < 0.001) and shocks (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.47-0.94; P = 0.021). Differences in sex-specific SVA risk profile were not confirmed in CRT-D patients (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.55-1.09; P = 0.14) nor in those with an ejection fraction <30% (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.52-1.23; P = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

After matching demographics, indications, principal comorbidities, and concomitant therapy, women still exhibited a lower SVA risk profile than men, except in the subgroups of CRT-D or/and ejection fraction <30%.

Programming Optimization in Implantable Cardiac Monitors to Reduce False-Positive Arrhythmia Alerts: A Call for Research

No studies have investigated whether optimizing implantable cardiac monitors (ICM) programming can reduce false-positive (FP) alerts. We identified patients implanted with an ICM (BIOMONITOR III) who had more than 10 FP alerts in a 1-month retrospective period. Uniform adjustments of settings were performed based on the mechanism of FP triggers and assessed at 1 month. Eight patients (mean age 57.5 ± 23.2 years; 37% female) were enrolled. In 4 patients, FPs were caused by undersensing of low-amplitude premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). No further false bradycardia was observed with a more aggressive decay of the dynamic sensing threshold. Furthermore, false atrial fibrillation (AF) alerts decreased in 2 of 3 patients. Two patients had undersensing of R waves after high-amplitude PVCs; false bradycardia episodes disappeared or were significantly reduced by limiting the initial value of the sensing threshold. Finally, the presence of atrial ectopic activity or irregular sinus rhythm generated false alerts of AF in 2 patients that were reduced by increasing the R-R variability limit and the confirmation time. In conclusion, adjustments to nominal settings can reduce the number of FP episodes in ICM patients. More research is needed to provide practical recommendations and assess the value of extended ICM programmability.

Early evaluation of atrial high rate episodes using remote monitoring in pacemaker patients: Results from the RAPID study

Aim

Remote monitoring (RM) of implantable cardiac devices has enabled continuous surveillance of atrial high rate episodes (AHREs) with well‐recognized clinical benefits. We aimed to add evidence on the role of the RM as compared to conventional follow‐up by investigating the interval from AHRE onset to physician’s evaluation and reaction time in actionable episodes.

Methods and Results

A total of 97 dual‐chamber pacemaker recipients were followed with RM (RM‐ON group; N = 64) or conventional in‐office visits (RM‐OFF group; N = 33) for 18 months. In‐office visits were scheduled at 1, 6, 12, and 18 months in the RM‐OFF group and at 1 and 18 months in the RM‐ON group. The overall AHRE rate was 1.98 per patient‐year (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.76–2.20) with no difference between the two groups (RM‐ON vs. RM‐OFF weighted‐HR, 0.88; CI, 0.36–2.13; p = .78). In the RM‐ON group, 100% AHREs evaluated within 11 days from onset, and within 202 days in the RM‐OFF group, with a median evaluation delay 79 days shorter in the RM‐ON group versus the RM‐OFF group (p < .0001). Therapy adjustment in actionable AHREs occurred 77 days earlier in the RM‐ON group versus the control group (p < .001). In the RM‐ON group, there were 50% less in‐office visits as compared to the RM‐OFF group (p < .001).

Conclusions

In our pacemaker population with no history of atrial fibrillation, RM allowed significant reduction of AHRE evaluation delay and prompted treatment of actionable episodes as compared to biannual in‐office visit schedule.

Remote Monitoring of CIEDs-For Both Safety, Economy and Convenience?

Cardiac implantable electronic devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators are increasingly monitored by systems transmitting information directly from the patient to the hospital. This may increase safety and patient satisfaction and also under certain circumstances represent an economic advantage. The review summarizes some of the recent research in the field of remote monitoring of cardiac devices.

One-year mortality after implantable defibrillator implantation: do risk stratification models help improving clinical practice?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the available mortality risk stratification models for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) patients.

METHODS

We conducted a review of mortality risk stratification models and tested their ability to improve prediction of 1-year survival after implant in a database of patients who received a remotely controlled ICD/CRT-D device during routine care and included in the independent Home Monitoring Expert Alliance registry.

RESULTS

We identified ten predicting models published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000 and 2021 (Parkash, PACE, MADIT, aCCI, CHA2DS2-VASc quartiles, CIDS, FADES, Sjoblom, AAACC, and MADIT-ICD non-arrhythmic mortality score) that could be tested in our database as based on common demographic, clinical, echocardiographic, electrocardiographic, and laboratory variables. Our cohort included 1,911 patients with left ventricular dysfunction (median age 71, 18.3% female) from sites not using any risk stratification score for systematic patient screening. Patients received an ICD (53.8%) or CRT-D (46.2%) between 2011 and 2017, after standard physician evaluation. There were 56 deaths within 1-year post-implant, with an all-cause mortality rate of 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-3.8%). Four predicting models (Parkash, MADIT, AAACC, and MADIT-ICD non-arrhythmic mortality score) were significantly associated with increased risk of 1-year mortality with hazard ratios ranging from 3.75 (CI, 1.31-10.7) to 6.53 (CI 1.52-28.0, p ≤ 0.014 for all four). Positive predictive values of 1-year mortality were below 25% for all models.

CONCLUSION

In our analysis, the models we tested conferred modest incremental predicting power to ordinary screening methods.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation

Aims

There are conflicting data on the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to compare patient outcomes according to the presence or absence of permanent AF at device implantation.

Methods and results

We retrospectively analysed remote monitoring data from 1141 CRT defibrillators. Propensity score with inverse‐probability weighting method was used to balance AF and sinus rhythm (SR) groups. Analysis endpoints included total mortality, appropriate defibrillation shocks, and CRT percentage. There were 229 patients (20.1%) in the AF group and 912 patients (79.9%) in the SR group. Compared with SR patients, AF patients were older (median age, 77 vs. 72 years, P < 0.001), more frequently male (82.5% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.02), and had higher heart rate (75.7 vs. 71.0 b.p.m., P < 0.001). Of the 229 AF patients, 162 (70.7%) received suboptimal CRT (<98%) and 67 (29.3%) had adequate CRT (≥98%). During a median follow‐up of 24 months, total mortality did not differ between AF and SR groups (propensity‐score‐weighted hazard ratio, HR 1.32 [95% confidence interval, 0.82–2.15], P = 0.25). The risk of appropriate shocks was significantly higher in the AF group with <98% CRT than in the SR group (weighted‐HR, 1.99 [1.21–3.26], P = 0.006) and was similar in the AF group with ≥98% CRT versus the SR group (1.29 [0.66–2.53], P = 0.45). During follow‐up, sinus rhythm was recovered in 23 patients in the AF group (10%) after a median time of 106 (42–256) days. The rate of sinus rhythm recovery in the AF group was 4.5 (95% CI, 2.8–6.7) per 100 patient‐years; the rate of permanent AF occurrence in the SR group was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.9–3.3) per 100 patient‐years.

Conclusions

Although mortality was similar across patient groups, patients with permanent AF and suboptimal CRT had twofold higher risk of appropriate shocks than SR patients or AF patients with CRT ≥ 98%.

Organizational Models for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Remote Monitoring: Current and Future Directions

This review provides an overview of the literature on the organization, staffing, and structure of remote monitoring (RM) clinics, primarily from countries in Western Europe and United States, as well as the challenges, considerations, and future directions for RM clinic models of care. Using a current case example of an RM clinic in the Midwestern United States, this document provides key information from the viewpoint of a clinic undergoing a shift in workflow. Finally, this review distills key considerations for RM management for electrophysiology clinics, vendors and industry, and policy makers.

Device nurse intervention facilitates the patients' adaptation to cardiac shock devices in the remote monitoring era

BACKGROUND

A substantial number of patients with shock devices (implantable cardioverter defibrillators [ICDs] or ICDs with resynchronization [CRTDs]) experience psychological distress.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the device nurse telephone intervention's effect on improving the patient's adaptation to shock devices, quality of life (QOL), and anxiety in the remote monitoring era.

METHODS

The patient's adaptation to the device, health-related QOL, and anxiety were investigated by the modified Implanted Devices Adjustment-Japan score (IDAS), Short Form-36, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) before and 1-year after the device nurse telephone intervention, performed every 3 months. A total of 95 patients (median age 69 years and 25 females) participated. Sixty patients had ICDs and 35 CRTDs. Structural heart disease was observed in 72 patients, and idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias in the others. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 46% ± 15%. The median duration since the device implantation was 5.2 years.

RESULTS

The total IDAS score significantly improved from 28.42 ± 7.11 at baseline to 26.77 ± 7.68 (p = 0.0076) at 1 year. Both the state and trait anxiety significantly improved (from 38.9 ± 9.6 to 35.3 ± 9.0 [<0.0001] and 38.8 ± 10.3 to 36.2±9.8 [p = 0.0044], respectively). The prevalence of patients with a state and trait anxiety of more than 40 decreased from 44 (46%) and 38 (40%) patients before the study to 27 (28 %) and 32 (34 %) at 1 year. The SF-36 mental component summary score significantly increased (50.8 ± 8.3 at baseline to 53.1 ± 7.7 at 1 year, p = 0.0031).

CONCLUSIONS

The device nurse intervention facilitated the patient's adaptation to the shock device, increased the health-related QOL, and reduced the patient's anxiety.

Circadian periodicity affects the type of ventricular arrhythmias and efficacy of implantable defibrillator therapies

INTRODUCTION

Factors influencing malignant arrhythmia onset are not fully understood. We explored the circadian periodicity of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in patients with implantable cardioverter and cardiac resynchronization defibrillators (ICD/CRT-D).

METHODS

Time, morphology (monomorphic/polymorphic), and mode of termination (anti-tachycardia pacing [ATP] or shock) of VAs stored in a database of remote monitoring data were adjudicated. Episodes were grouped in six 4-h timeslots from 00:00 to 24:00. Circadian distributions and adjusted marginal odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence interval (CI), were analyzed using mixed-effect models and logit generalized estimating equations, respectively, to account for within-subject correlation of multiple episodes.

RESULTS

Among 1303 VA episodes from 446 patients (63% ICD and 37% CRT-D), 120 (9%) self-extinguished, and 842 (65%) were terminated by ATP, 343 (26%) by shock. VAs clustered from 08:00 to 16:00 with 44% of episodes, as compared with 22% from 00:00 to 08:00 (p < .001) and 34% from 16:00 to 24:00 (p = .005). Episodes were more likely to be polymorphic at night with an adjusted marginal OR of 1.66 (CI, 1.15-2.40; p = .007) at 00:00-04:00 versus other timeslots. Episodes were less likely to be terminated by ATP in the 00:00-04:00 (success-to-failure ratio, 0.67; CI, 0.46-0.98; p = .039) and 08:00-12:00 (0.70; CI, 0.51-0.96; p = .02) timeslots, and most likely to be terminated by ATP between 12:00 and 16:00 (success-to-failure ratio 1.42; CI, 1.06-1.91; p = .02).

CONCLUSION

VAs did not distribute uniformly over the 24 h, with a majority of episodes occurring from 08:00 to 16:00. Nocturnal episodes were more likely to be polymorphic. The efficacy of ATP depended on the time of delivery.

Home delivery of the communicator for remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices: A multicenter experience during the covid-19 lockdown

Background

During the COVID‐19 pandemic in‐person visits for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices should be replaced by remote monitoring (RM), in order to prevent viral transmission. A direct home‐delivery service of the RM communicator has been implemented at 49 Italian arrhythmia centers.

Methods

According to individual patient preference or the organizational decision of the center, patients were assigned to the home‐delivery group or the standard in‐clinic delivery group. In the former case, patients received telephone training on the activation process and use of the communicator. In June 2020, the centers were asked to reply to an ad hoc questionnaire to describe and evaluate their experience in the previous 3 months.

Results

RM was activated in 1324 patients: 821 (62%) received the communicator at home and the communicator was activated remotely. Activation required one additional call in 49% of cases, and the median time needed to complete the activation process was 15 min [25th‐75th percentile: 10–20]. 753 (92%) patients were able to complete the correct activation of the system. At the time when the questionnaire was completed, 743 (90%) communicators were regularly transmitting data. The service was generally deemed useful (96% of respondents) in facilitating the activation of RM during the COVID‐19 pandemic and possibly beyond.

Conclusions

Home delivery of the communicator proved to be a successful approach to system activation, and received positive feedback from clinicians. The increased use of a RM protocol will reduce risks for both providers and patients, while maintaining high‐quality care.

Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices during COVID-19 outbreak: "keep people safe" and "focus only on health care needs"

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged the ability of health care organisations to provide adequate care. We report the experience of a national tertiary electrophysiology centre in the management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) through the use of a fully remote follow-up model.

METHODS

We daily and prospectively collected remote monitoring (RM) relevant findings and following clinical actions performed from March 10^th to April 3^rd 2020, a period of suspension of routine ambulatory activity due to the national lockdown.

RESULTS

During the study period (25 days), we received 2,215 transmissions from 2,955 devices. Among them, 129 patients reported potential clinically actionable RM observations (event rate: 12.0/1000 patient-week). In 77 patients (60%), RM events triggered a clinical action, but only 5 patients needed an urgent in-hospital access (4 urgent procedures and 1 device reprogramming).

CONCLUSIONS

In the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic, RM became an essential tool in healthcare delivery for CIED patients. We observed that RM was effective in "keep people safe" and "focus only on individuals with health care needs".

Change in the use of remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices in Italian clinical practice over a 5-year period: results of two surveys promoted by the AIAC (Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing)

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of remote monitoring in Italian clinical practice and its trend over the last 5 years.

METHODS

In 2012 and 2017, two surveys were conducted. Both were open to all Italian implanting centres and consisted of 25 questions on the characteristics of the centre, their actual use of remote monitoring, applied organizational models and administrative and legal aspects.

RESULTS

The questionnaires were completed by 132 and 108 centres in 2012 and 2017, respectively (30.6 and 24.7% of all Italian implanting centres). In 2017, significantly fewer centres followed up fewer than 200 patients by remote monitoring than in 2012, while more followed up more than 500 patients (all P < 0.005). In most of the centres (77.6%) that responded to both surveys, the number of patients remotely monitored significantly increased from 2012 to 2017.In both surveys, remote monitoring was usually managed by physicians and nurses. Over the period, primary review of transmissions by physicians declined, while it was increasingly performed by nurses; the involvement of technicians rose, while that of manufacturers' technical personnel decreased. The percentage of centres in which transmissions were submitted to the physician only in critical cases rose (from 28.3 to 64.3%; P < 0.001). In 86.7% of centres, the lack of a reimbursement system was deemed the main barrier to implementing remote monitoring.

CONCLUSION

In the last 5 years, the number of patients followed up by remote monitoring has increased markedly. In most Italian centres, remote monitoring has increasingly been managed through a primary nursing model. The lack of a specific reimbursement system is perceived as the main barrier to implementing remote monitoring .

Atrial signal amplitude predicts atrial high-rate episodes in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: Insights from a large database of remote monitoring transmissions

BACKGROUND

Parameters measured during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implant also depend on bioelectrical properties of the myocardium. We aimed to explore their potential association with clinical outcomes in patients with single/dual-chamber ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D).

METHODS

In the framework of the Home Monitoring Expert Alliance, baseline electrical parameters for all implanted leads were compared by the occurrence of all-cause mortality, adjudicated ventricular arrhythmia (VA), and atrial high-rate episode lasting ≥24 hours (24 h AHRE).

RESULTS

In a cohort of 2976 patients (58.1% ICD) with a median follow-up of 25 months, event rates were 3.1/100 patient-years for all-cause mortality, 18.1/100 patient-years for VA, and 9.3/100 patient-years for 24 h AHRE. At univariate analysis, baseline shock impedance was consistently lower in groups with events than without, with a 40 Ω cutoff that better identified high-risk patients. However, at multivariable analysis, the adjusted-hazard ratios (HRs) lost statistical significance for any endpoint. Baseline atrial sensing amplitude during sinus rhythm was lower in patients with 24 h AHRE than in those without (2.45 [IQR: 1.65-3.85] vs 3.51 [IQR: 2.37-4.67] mV, P < .01). The adjusted HR for 24 h AHRE in patients with atrial sensing >1.5 mV vs those with values ≤1.5 mV was 0.52 (95% CI: 0.33-0.83), P = .006.

CONCLUSIONS

Although lower baseline shock impedance was observed in patients with events, the association lost statistical significance at multivariable analysis. Conversely, low sinus rhythm atrial sensing (≤1.5 mV) measured with standard transvenous leads could identify subjects at high risk of atrial arrhythmia.

Rate-responsive pacing and atrial high rate episodes in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: Is low heart rate the key?

BACKGROUND

The role of atrial rate-responsive (RR) pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is unclear due to the favorable effect of rate lowering in systolic heart failure. Atrial high rate episodes (AHREs) in CRT recipients are particularly worrisome since they cause loss of CRT, beyond representing a stroke risk factor.

HYPOTHESIS

The presence of an association between RR and the incidence of AHREs.

METHODS

Daily remote transmissions from 836 CRT recipients were analyzed. AHREs were classified by duration: ≥15 minutes, ≥5 hours, and ≥ 24 hours. Variables possibly associated to AHREs were included in time-dependent proportional-hazard models, averaging over 30-day periods and adjusting for main baseline variables.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 23.9 (12.2-36.0) months, 507 (60.6%) patients experienced at least one 15-minute AHRE. RR function was programmed in 166 (19.8%) patients and was associated with an increased AHRE occurrence rate with hazard ratio (HR) ranging from 1.45 to 1.78 for the 3 cutoffs of episode duration. The negative effect of RR function was not observed in the subset of patients with low mean heart rate (<68 bpm). Higher mean heart rates increased AHRE risk (HR:1.02, P = .01), while CRT amount decreased it (HR:0.98, P < .01). The extent of atrial pacing did not predict AHRE occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

RR pacing in CRT recipients is associated with increased AHRE occurrence, especially when an average heart rate > 68 bpm is attained.

Long-term outcomes after prophylactic ICD and CRT-D implantation in nonischemic patients: Analysis from a nationwide database of daily remote-monitoring transmissions

INTRODUCTION

Clinical trials did not provide conclusive evidence concerning the benefit of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with severe nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). We aimed to compare incidence of appropriate sustained ventricular arrhythmia (SVA) and device therapy in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) vs NICM ICD and/or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed remote-monitoring data from devices of the Home Monitoring Expert Alliance network. SVA recordings were adjudicated by three independent electrophysiologists. Our cohort included 1,946 patients who received either an ICD (55%) or a CRT-D (45%) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Median (interquartile range) age was 70 (62-77) years, 81% were male, and 52% were in the ICM group. Patients were remotely monitored for a maximum follow-up of 5 years. The 5-year product-limit estimate of SVA incidence in patients with an ICD was 47.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.0%-53.9%) in the ICM group and 44.7% (36.9%-53.3%) in the NICM group. In patients with a CRT-D, SVA incidence was 45.7% (37.3%-55.0%) in ICM patients and 49.2% (40.4%-58.7%) in NICM patients. The adjusted hazard ratio for SVA in the ICM vs NICM group was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.70-1.30, P = .77) in ICD patients and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.61-1.18, P = .34) in CRT-D patients. SVAs triggered appropriate device therapies with similar incidence in all groups.

CONCLUSION

In a large cohort of remotely monitored ICD and CRT-D recipients, SVA incidence did not significantly differ in ICM and NICM patients.

Organizational model and reactions to alerts in remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A survey from the Home Monitoring Expert Alliance project

BACKGROUND

This survey aimed to describe the organizational workflow of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) remote monitoring (RM) service in ordinary practice.

METHODS

A questionnaire was designed for our purpose and completed by 49 sites participating to the Italian Home Monitoring Expert Alliance.

RESULTS

A dedicated organizational model for RM was set up for 86% of centers. The median RM team consisted of 2 (Interquartile range [IQR]: 1-3) physicians and 1 (IQR: 0-2) nurse. RM service was available in working hours and the median percentage of patients included was 100% (IQR: 10%-100%) for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients and 5% (IQR:0%-30%) for pacemakers. In-office follow-up was performed every 12 and 6 months for pacemaker and ICD/CRT recipients, respectively. More than 90% of sites used to activate all technical alerts, with a prompt reaction in case of an out-of-range parameter. The threshold for atrial fibrillation (AF) daily burden notification in most cases ranged from 2.4 to 7.2 hours. All ventricular arrhythmias alerts were usually switched on: an inappropriate therapy or more than one appropriate episode triggered an urgent in-hospital visit. Concerning heart failure, low CRT percentage pacing alert was always used, while the other available notifications were less frequently switched on.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey showed that RM service was usually set up with a primary nursing model including on average two responsible physicians and one nurse and mainly offered to ICD/CRT patients. Technical, AF and ventricular arrhythmia alerts triggered prompt reactions, while heart failure related indexes were generally less applied.