Are there gender differences in patients with coronary artery disease presenting with spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation?

Gender difference and characteristics attributed to coronary artery disease in Gaza-Palestine

Traditionally coronary artery disease (CAD) has been considered as disease affecting men, and for long time women were not included in researches programme. In both sexes, coronary heart disease risk increases with age. Extensive clinical and statistical studies have identified serial factors that increase the risk of coronary heart disease, some of them can be modified, and some cannot. This study was performed to analyze the extent to which cardiovascular risk factors can explain the gender difference in coronary heart disease.

The Effect of Gender on Mortality or Appropriate Shock in Patients with Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Who Have Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

BACKGROUND

As heart disease is increasingly recognized in women and as important studies have elucidated the benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), little is known regarding the effect of gender difference on arrhythmic risk in this population. We sought to determine if there are gender differences in arrhythmic risk and potential defibrillator benefit in patients with NICM.

METHODS

The records of 767 consecutive patients who underwent ICD implant at the Stanford Medical Center from 1984 to 2002 were reviewed. Only patients with NICM were considered (n = 201, 26.2%). Of these, 140 patients had clinical follow-up information available. Baseline variables were examined, including age, baseline heart rate, ejection fraction, and medications. We evaluated the time to first shock as well as all-cause mortality in this patient population. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted, a log-rank test was used to evaluate significance, and Cox-proportional hazards test was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

There were 88 (62.9%) men and 52 (37.1%) women. Between male and female patients, there were no significant differences in baseline mean age (54.8 +/- 1.9 years vs 53.1 +/- 2.3 years, respectively), ejection fraction (35.2 +/- 2.0% vs 33.3 +/- 2.3%, respectively), and mean left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (6.4 +/- 0.3 cm vs 5.9 +/- 0.2 cm, respectively). Mean follow-up time was 30.8 months. Thirty-two male patients (36.4 +/- 0.05%) received appropriate shocks compared with 20 female patients (38.5 +/- 0.07%). Mean time to the first appropriate shock was 11.9 +/- 3.9 months for male patients and 21.3 +/- 5.8 months for female patients (P = 0.2). Nineteen male patients (21.6 +/- 0.05%) died or received heart transplant during the follow-up period compared with 6 female patients (11.5 +/- 0.04%) (P = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

Male and female patients with NICM who received ICDs had similar rate of appropriate shock and mortality. In this population gender does not appear to be an important risk factor for mortality or arrhythmic events.

Gender differences in ventricular arrhythmia recurrence in patients with coronary artery disease and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether men and women with coronary artery disease (CAD) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) differ in frequency of arrhythmia recurrence and whether gender differences are independent of clinical, electrocardiographic, and electrophysiologic characteristics.

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic studies show that women have a lower rate of sudden cardiac death (SCD) than men, even among patients with CAD. Whether this is due to differing susceptibilities to ischemia or to arrhythmia is unknown.

METHODS

The clinical records and ICD data disks of 340 men and 59 women with CAD who received an ICD between June 1990 and June 2000 were reviewed. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) recurrences were compared between genders and relationship with other factors was analyzed.

RESULTS

Sustained VT/VF occurred in 52% of men and 34% of women (p < 0.01). Men experienced more total VT/VF events (p < 0.01), more shock-treated VT/VF events (p < 0.03), more electrical storms (p < 0.001), and had VT/VF on more days in follow-up (p < 0.01). Gender differences were independent of measured clinical, electrocardiographic, and electrophysiologic factors. In stratified analyses, the gender differences in VT/VF recurrence were greatest in patients presenting with sustained monomorphic VT and those with inducible VT at electrophysiology study.

CONCLUSIONS

Women were less likely to experience VT/VF, and had fewer VT/VF episodes, than men. These findings were strongest in patients with evidence of a stable anatomic VT circuit: those with clinical or electrophysiologically induced VT. This study suggests that differing susceptibility to arrhythmia triggering may underlie the known differences in SCD rates between men and women.