Constrictive pericarditis after coronary artery bypass surgery as a cause of unexplained dyspnea: a report of five cases

Diagnosis and surgical management of pericardial constriction after cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVES

Previous cardiac surgery is an increasingly common etiology of constrictive pericarditis, but there is a paucity of data on clinical presentation and outcome of surgical treatment.

METHODS

We reviewed data of 263 patients who underwent pericardiectomy for postoperative constriction from January 1, 1993, through July 1, 2017. Outcomes of interest were early and late mortality, as well as features of clinical presentation.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 64 (56-72) years, and the median interval between previous operation and pericardiectomy was 2.7 years (range, 0-54 years). Previous operations included coronary artery bypass grafting in 114 (43%), valve surgery in 85 (32%), combined coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery in 33 (13%), and other procedures in 31 (12%). Common presentations were symptoms of right heart failure in 221 (84%) or dyspnea in 42 (16%). Moderate-to-severe tricuspid valve regurgitation was present in 108 (41%) patients. There were 14 (5.5%) deaths within 30 days postoperatively, and survival at 5 and 10 years postoperatively was 61% and 44%. On multivariate analysis, older age (P = .013), diabetes (P = .019), and nonelective pericardiectomy within 2 years of cardiac surgery (P < .001) were associated with decreased long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Pericardial constriction after cardiac surgery can present at any interval postoperatively. Symptoms and signs of right heart failure in patients with previous cardiac surgery should alert physicians to the possibility of pericardial constriction followed by a correct diagnosis. Pericardiectomy performed urgently following cardiac operation has poor long-term outcomes.

Early-onset post-cardiotomy severe constrictive pericarditis: a case report

Background

Constrictive pericarditis (CP) can be one of the most challenging conditions to diagnose within cardiovascular medicine. Iatrogenic causes of CP are increasingly recognized in higher income countries. This case provides insight into the need for clinical suspicion when diagnosing this relatively under recognized clinical entity as well as the need for multimodality imaging combined with invasive haemodynamic assessment.

Case summary

A 68-year-old man presented with decompensated heart failure 4 weeks after open-heart surgery. A diagnosis of early-onset post-cardiotomy CP was made using multimodality imaging and invasive haemodynamic assessment, which demonstrated the cardinal features of constrictive physiology. Surgical intervention with two pericardiectomy procedures was pursued given the aggressive and recalcitrant nature of his presentation. Our patient died shortly after his second surgery due to progressive multi-organ dysfunction.

Conclusion

Constrictive pericarditis is a challenging but important clinical entity to diagnose. Differentiating CP from restrictive cardiomyopathy is important as there are key differences in management and prognosis. Our case supports the clinical utility of multimodality imaging combined with invasive haemodynamic assessment in patients with suspected CP.

Constrictive pericarditis following surgical repair of a peritoneopericardial diaphragmatic hernia in a cat

A 4-year-old female spayed domestic longhair cat was referred for dyspnea. Further diagnostics revealed severe pleural effusion and a peritoneopericardial diaphragmatic hernia (PPDH). Following surgical correction of the PPDH the pleural effusion persisted. Re-check echocardiogram 4 weeks after initial evaluation revealed leftward deviation of the interventricular septum and interatrial septum occurring with inspiration. There were also exaggerated phasic changes in trans-tricuspid flow velocities suggestive of constrictive pericardial disease. Cardiac catheterization was performed and revealed elevated pressures in the right atrium and right ventricle. Constrictive pericarditis (CP) and epicarditis was confirmed at surgery, where subtotal pericardiectomy was performed with epicardial decortication. The cat continued to develop recurrent pleural effusion after surgery, although the volume and frequency of recurrence slowed over time. This is the first reported case of CP following PPDH repair in a cat.

Constrictive pericarditis after cardiac surgery

Constrictive pericarditis may develop as a midterm or late complication of cardiac surgery. Owing to limited incidence and scarce reports in the literature the pathophysiologic determinants of such conditions are scarcely known, although a number of mechanisms have been implicated. This disease often poses major diagnostic issues as its clinical picture at presentation is nonspecific, may develop at any moment during the postoperative follow-up, and transthoracic echocardiography may be not suggestive of the diagnosis. The present paper aims at critically revising the available literature on the topic, emphasizing the need to keep a high level of suspicion for all surgeons and physicians involved in the long-term care of cardiac surgery patients.

A modern cause of an old disease. Constrictive pericarditis after percutaneous coronary intervention: a case report

A 70-year-old patient developed severe constrictive pericarditis with exertional dyspnea, lethargy and marked peripheral edema four months after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. The diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis was confirmed by cardiac catheterization and computed tomography. Despite the short duration of the disease, the pericardium showed fibrosis and had a thickness of approximately 6 mm. The patient underwent pericardiectomy, with a satisfactory outcome. Hemopericardium due to coronary microperforation was suspected to be responsible for the development of constrictive pericarditis. This unusual mid-term complication of percutaneous coronary intervention has rarely been reported and should be suspected in this particular clinical setting.

Early development of severe constrictive pericarditis after coronary bypass grafting

A 61-year-old patient developed severe constrictive pericarditis with exertional dyspnea, 3 weeks after coronary bypass surgery. The diagnosis was confirmed by echocardigraphy and computed tomography examination. Despite the short duration of the disease, the pericardium showed a thickness of about 1 cm. Because initial treatment with steroids, diuretics and antiinflammatory drugs was of no avail, the patient underwent pericardiectomy, with a satisfactory outcome. The relatively rapid progress of constriction and the marked thickness of the pericardium that developed after a short period of time are emphasized.

Clinical characteristics of patients with constrictive pericarditis after coronary bypass surgery

Constrictive pericarditis (CP) is an unusual sequela of cardiac surgery, so the present study evaluated the clinical characteristics of patients with CP after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Four hundred and sixty-three patients who underwent isolated CABG between January 1989 and March 1999 were examined retrospectively. The first choice of treatment for postoperative pericardial effusion was non-steroid anti-inflammatory agents, and an increased dose of diuretics. The second treatment choice was corticosteroids or pericardial drainage. When CP was suspected during the follow-up period (mean, 54+/-31 months), cardiac catheterization was carried out to establish the diagnosis. Of the 463 patients undergoing CABG, there were 11 (2.4%) who developed CP after surgery. The median time to the onset of symptoms after CABG was 4 weeks (range, 3-96 weeks). On univariate and multivariate analysis, normal left ventricular ejection fraction, warfarin administration, and early postoperative pericardial effusion were significantly associated with a greater potential of postoperative CP. The effusion was bloody in all cases of pericardial drainage despite warfarin therapy. Not draining the postoperative effusive pericardial effusion was a risk factor for the development of CP. Pericardial drainage for patients with significant effusion after CABG is important for the prevention of subsequent CP, especially in those patients being treated with warfarin or with normal left ventricular function.