18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) imaging in the staging and prognosis of inflammatory breast cancer

Joint EANM-SNMMI guideline on the role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in no special type breast cancer : (endorsed by the ACR, ESSO, ESTRO, EUSOBI/ESR, and EUSOMA)

INTRODUCTION

There is much literature about the role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with breast cancer (BC). However, there exists no international guideline with involvement of the nuclear medicine societies about this subject.

PURPOSE

To provide an organized, international, state-of-the-art, and multidisciplinary guideline, led by experts of two nuclear medicine societies (EANM and SNMMI) and representation of important societies in the field of BC (ACR, ESSO, ESTRO, EUSOBI/ESR, and EUSOMA).

METHODS

Literature review and expert discussion were performed with the aim of collecting updated information regarding the role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with no special type (NST) BC and summarizing its indications according to scientific evidence. Recommendations were scored according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria.

RESULTS

Quantitative PET features (SUV, MTV, TLG) are valuable prognostic parameters. In baseline staging, 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT plays a role from stage IIB through stage IV. When assessing response to therapy, 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT should be performed on certified scanners, and reported either according to PERCIST, EORTC PET, or EANM immunotherapy response criteria, as appropriate. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT may be useful to assess early metabolic response, particularly in non-metastatic triple-negative and HER2+ tumours. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT is useful to detect the site and extent of recurrence when conventional imaging methods are equivocal and when there is clinical and/or laboratorial suspicion of relapse. Recent developments are promising.

CONCLUSION

2-[18F]FDG PET/CT is extremely useful in BC management, as supported by extensive evidence of its utility compared to other imaging modalities in several clinical scenarios.

Quarter-Century Transformation of Oncology: Positron Emission Tomography for Patients with Breast Cancer

PET radiotracers have become indispensable in the care of patients with breast cancer. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose has become the preferred method of many oncologists for systemic staging of breast cancer at initial diagnosis, detecting recurrent disease, and for measuring treatment response after therapy. 18F-Sodium Fluoride is valuable for detection of osseous metastases. 18F-fluoroestradiol is now FDA-approved with multiple appropriate clinical uses. There are multiple PET radiotracers in clinical trials, which may add utility of PET imaging for patients with breast cancer in the future. This article will describe the advances during the last quarter century in PET for patients with breast cancer.

Women's Health Update: Growing Role of PET for Patients with Breast Cancer

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) has been growing in usage for patients with breast cancer, due to an increased number of FDA-approved PET radiotracers pertinent to patients with breast cancer as well as increased prospective evidence for the value of these agents. The leading PET radiotracer for patients with breast cancer is 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), which measures glucose metabolism. There is prospective evidence for the use of 18F-FDG PET in systemic staging of newly diagnosed locally advanced breast cancer (stages IIB-IIIC), monitoring breast cancer treatment response, and detecting breast cancer recurrence, particularly in no special type (NST) breast cancer. 16α-18F-fluoro-17β-Fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) is a radiolabeled estrogen which evaluates estrogen receptor (ER) accessible for estrogen binding. There is prospective evidence supporting 18F-FES PET as a predictive biomarker for selecting patients with metastatic breast cancer for endocrine therapies. 18F-FES PET has also been shown to be valuable in the evaluation of ER status of lesions which are difficult to biopsy, for evaluation of ER status in lesions that are equivocal on other imaging modalities, and for selecting optimal dosage of novel ER-targeted systemic therapies in early clinical trials. Multiple investigators have suggested 18F-FES PET will have an increasing role for patients with invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC), which is less optimally evaluated by 18F-FDG PET. Sodium 18F-Fluoride (18F-NaF) evaluates bone turnover and has been effective in evaluation of malignancies which commonly metastasize to bone. In patients with metastatic breast cancer, 18F-NaF PET/CT has demonstrated superior sensitivity for osseous metastases than 99mTc-MDP or CT. In addition to these three FDA-approved PET radiotracers, there are multiple novel radiotracers currently in clinical trials with potential to further increase PET usage for patients with breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Systemic Staging (Comparison of Computed Tomography, Bone Scan, and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/Computed Tomography)

After an overview of the principles of bone scintigraphy, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT, the advantages and limits of these modalities in the staging of breast cancer are discussed in this paper. CT and PET/CT are not optimal for delineating primary tumor volume, and PET is less efficient than the sentinel node biopsy to depict small axillary lymph node metastases. In large breast cancer tumor, FDG PET/CT is useful to show extra-axillary lymph nodes. FDG PET/CT is superior to bone scan and CE-CT in detecting distant metastases, and it results in a change of treatment plan in nearly 15% of patients.

Advances in PET/CT Imaging for Breast Cancer

One out of eight women will be affected by breast cancer during her lifetime. Imaging plays a key role in breast cancer detection and management, providing physicians with information about tumor location, heterogeneity, and dissemination. In this review, we describe the latest advances in PET/CT imaging of breast cancer, including novel applications of 18F-FDG PET/CT and the development and testing of new agents for primary and metastatic breast tumor imaging and therapy. Ultimately, these radiopharmaceuticals may guide personalized approaches to optimize treatment based on the patient's specific tumor profile, and may become a new standard of care. In addition, they may enhance the assessment of treatment efficacy and lead to improved outcomes for patients with a breast cancer diagnosis.

A Case of Advanced Bilateral Inflammatory Breast Cancer: A Radiological Perspective

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive form of breast cancer that accounts for only a small percent of invasive breast cancers in the United States. We report a case of advanced bilateral IBC in a 60-year-old female. This case report explores the clinical presentation, pathological findings, and different imaging modalities that can assist in the diagnosis of this disease. The initial diagnosis was based on imaging findings from both contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT). The diagnosis was then confirmed with histopathological findings.

The Effect of PACS in Breast Tumor Diagnosis Based on Numerical Analysis

The incidence and mortality rates are increasing year by year, and the incidence of the disease is gradually becoming younger. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical diagnostic value of PACS in breast tumor patients. Methods. 20 patients with breast tumor diagnosed by PACS were selected for the study, and the diagnosis was confirmed by pathological puncture or surgery. Results. The detection rates of breast tumor by MRI and CT were 94.44% and 96.67%, the sensitivities were 18.82% breast tumor and 96.67%, and the specificities were 53.84% and 54.54%, with no statistically significant difference ( $P>0.05$ ). There was no statistically significant difference in the detection rate of invasive lobular carcinoma (LDC) and PACS ( $P>0.05$ ). Conclusion. PACS has a greater detection rate for breast tumor and offers some diagnostic usefulness in diagnosing malignant breast tumor. The detection rate of breast tumors can be increased by selecting the most appropriate diagnostic tool for the patient’s current circumstances.

Novel applications of molecular imaging to guide breast cancer therapy

The goals of precision oncology are to provide targeted drug therapy based on each individual’s specific tumor biology, and to enable the prediction and early assessment of treatment response to allow treatment modification when necessary. Thus, precision oncology aims to maximize treatment success while minimizing the side effects of inadequate or suboptimal therapies. Molecular imaging, through noninvasive assessment of clinically relevant tumor biomarkers across the entire disease burden, has the potential to revolutionize clinical oncology, including breast oncology. In this article, we review breast cancer positron emission tomography (PET) imaging biomarkers for providing early response assessment and predicting treatment outcomes. For 2-¹⁸fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG), a marker of cellular glucose metabolism that is well established for staging multiple types of malignancies including breast cancer, we highlight novel applications for early response assessment. We then review current and future applications of novel PET biomarkers for imaging the steroid receptors, including the estrogen and progesterone receptors, the HER2 receptor, cellular proliferation, and amino acid metabolism.

FDG-PET/CT for Primary Staging and Detection of Recurrence of Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer diagnosed in women worldwide. Accurate baseline staging is necessary to plan optimal breast cancer management. Early detection and staging of recurrence are also essential for optimal therapeutic management. Hybrid FDG-PET/CT imaging offers high sensitivity in detecting extra axillary lymph nodes and distant metastases. Although FDG-PET/CT has some limitations for low proliferative tumors, low-grade tumors and for well-differentiated luminal breast cancer, PET/CT is useful for the initial staging of breast cancer, regardless of tumor phenotype (luminal, triple negative, or HER2+) and of tumor grade. Although FDG-PET/CT performs better for invasive ductal carcinoma (invasive carcinoma of no specific subtype), it is also helpful for staging invasive lobular carcinomas. At initial staging, FDG-PET/CT becomes very useful for staging from clinical stage IIB (T2N1 or T3N0). FDG-PET/CT could be useful in patients with clinical stage IIA (T1N1 or T2N0), but there is not enough strong evidence to recommend routine use in this subgroup. For clinical stage I (T1N0) patients, FDG-PET/CT offers no added value. In patients with recurrent breast cancer, FDG-PET/CT is more effective than conventional imaging in detecting locoregional or distant recurrence, whether suspected by clinical examination, conventional imaging, or elevation of a tumor marker (CA 15.3 or CEA). PET/CT is effective even in the presence of normal tumor markers. PET/CT is also a powerful imaging modality for performing a whole-body workup of a known recurrence and for determining whether or not the recurrence is isolated.

Head-to-Head Comparison between 18F-FES PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Oestrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is a powerful diagnostic tool in breast cancer (BC). However, it might have a reduced sensitivity in differentiated, oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) BC. In this setting, specific molecular imaging with fluorine-oestradiol (¹⁸F-FES) PET/CT could help in overcoming these limitations; however, the literature on the diagnostic accuracy of this method is limited. We therefore planned this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-FES PET/CT in ER+ BC patients. We performed a literature search to identify all studies performing a head-to-head comparison between the two methods; we excluded review articles, preclinical studies, case reports and small case series. Finally, seven studies were identified (overall: 171 patients; range: 7–49 patients). A patients-based analysis (PBA) showed that ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-FES PET/CT had a similar high pooled sensitivity (97% and 94%, respectively) at the lesion-based analysis (LBA), ¹⁸F-FES performed slightly better than ¹⁸F-FDG (pooled sensitivity: 95% vs. 85%, respectively). Moreover, when we considered only the studies dealing with the restaging setting (n = 3), this difference in sensitivity was even more marked (98% vs. 81%, respectively). In conclusion, both tracers feature an excellent sensitivity in ER+ BC; however, ¹⁸F-FES PET/CT could be preferred in the restaging setting.

Baseline 18F-FDG PET textural features as predictors of response to chemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

PURPOSE

We sought to investigate the performance of radiomics analysis on baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting response to first-line chemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-five patients who received first-line rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy for DLBCL were included in the study. Radiomics features and standard uptake value (SUV)-based measurements were extracted from baseline PET images for a total of 147 lesions. The selection of the most relevant features was made using the recursive feature elimination algorithm. A machine-learning model was trained using the logistic regression classifier with cross-validation to predict treatment response. The independent predictors of incomplete response were evaluated with multivariable regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 14 textural features were selected by the recursive elimination algorithm, achieving a feature-to-lesion ratio of 1:10. The accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the model for predicting incomplete response were 0.87 and 0.81, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that SUVmax and gray level co-occurrence matrix dissimilarity were independent predictors of lesions with incomplete response to first-line R-CHOP chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Increased textural heterogeneity in baseline PET images was found to be associated with incomplete response in DLBCL.

Diagnostic Performance of [18F]FDG PET in Staging Grade 1-2, Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

Positron emission tomography using [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG PET) potentially underperforms for staging of patients with grade 1–2 estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET in this patient population. Suspect tumor lesions detected on conventional imaging and FDG PET were confirmed with pathology or follow up. PET-positive lesions were (semi)quantified with standardized uptake values (SUV) and these were correlated with various pathological features, including the histological subtype. Pre-operative imaging detected 155 pathologically verified lesions (in 74 patients). A total of 115/155 (74.2%) lesions identified on FDG PET were classified as true positive, i.e., malignant (in 67 patients) and 17/155 (10.8%) lesions as false positive, i.e., benign (in 9 patients); 7/155 (4.5%) as false negative (in 7 patients) and 16/155 (10.3%) as true negative (in 14 patients). FDG PET incorrectly staged 16/70 (22.9%) patients. The FDG uptake correlated with histological subtype, showing higher uptake in ductal carcinoma, compared to lobular carcinoma (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Within this study, FDG PET inadequately staged 22.9% of grade 1–2, ER + BC cases. Incorrect staging can lead to inappropriate treatment choices, potentially affecting survival and quality of life. Prospective studies investigating novel radiotracers are urgently needed.

Breast cancer: initial workup and staging with FDG PET/CT

Purpose

Precise staging is needed to plan optimal management in breast cancer. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography coupled with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) offers high sensitivity in detecting extra axillary lymph nodes and distant metastases. This review aims to clarify in which groups of patients staging with FDG-PET/CT would be beneficial and should be offered. We also discuss how tumor biology and breast cancer subtypes should be taken into account when interpreting FDG-PET/CT scans.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive literature review and rigorous appraisal of research studies assessing indications for FDG-PET/CT in breast cancer. This assessment regarding breast cancer served as a basis for the recommendations set by a working group of the French Society of Nuclear Medicine, in collaboration with oncological societies, for developing good clinical practice recommendations on the use of FDG-PET/CT in oncology.

Results

FDG-PET/CT is useful for initial staging of breast cancer, independently of tumor phenotype (triple negative, luminal or HER2 +) and regardless of tumor grade. Considering histological subtype, FDG-PET/CT performs better for staging invasive ductal carcinoma, although it is also helpful for staging invasive lobular carcinomas. Based on the available data, FDG-PET/CT becomes useful for staging starting from clinical stage IIB. FDG-PET/CT is possibly useful in patients with clinical stage IIA (T1N1 or T2N0), but there is not enough strong data to recommend routine use in this subgroup. For clinical stage I (T1N0) patients, staging with FDG-PET/CT offers no added value.

Conclusion

FDG-PET/CT is useful for staging patients with breast cancer, starting from clinical stage IIB.

Real-time monitoring of single circulating tumor cells with a fluorescently labeled deoxy-glucose by in vivo flow cytometry

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) play an essential role in metastasis and serve as an important prognostic biomarker. The technology of CTC labeling and detection in vivo can greatly improve the research of cancer metastasis and therapy. However, there is no in vivo technology to detect CTCs in clinic. In this study, we demonstrate that 2-[N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl) amino]-2-deoxy-d-glucose (2-NBDG), a 2-deoxy-glucose analog, can work in vivo to indicate CTCs and metastases fluorescently by direct intravenous injection. During the development of an implanted tumor in mice, the spontaneous CTCs released from the primary tumor into blood vessels can be labeled by 2-NBDG due to the abnormal metabolism of CTCs. The green fluorescence of 2-NBDG from CTCs is then noninvasively detected by an in vivo flow cytometry system. Due to the high uptake of glucose by tumor cells, the CTCs in mice can maintain a high 2-NBDG level and thus be distinguished by 2-NBDG fluorescence in vivo efficiently, enabling tumor detection in vivo like positron emission tomography (PET) but at the single-cell resolution. Our results suggest 2-NBDG, a glucose analog with high biosafety, holds promising potential in clinical applications, similar to the widely-used contrast medium 2-F¹⁸ -fluorodeoxyglucose in PET.

New Treatment Strategies for the Inflammatory Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) remains the most aggressive type of breast cancer. During the past decade, enormous progress has been made to refine diagnostic criteria and establish multimodality treatment strategies as keys for the improvement of survival outcomes. Multiple genomic studies enabled a better understanding of underlying tumor biology, which is responsible for the complex and aggressive nature of IBC. Despite these important achievements, outcomes for this subgroup of patients remain unsatisfactory compared to locally advanced non-IBC counterparts. Global efforts are now focused on identifying novel strategies that will improve treatment response, prolong survival for metastatic patients, achieve superior local control, and possibly increase the cure rate for locally advanced disease. Genomic technologies constitute the most important tool that will support future clinical progress. Gene-expressing profiling of the tumor tissue and liquid biopsy are important parts of the everyday clinical practice aiming to guide treatment decisions by providing information on tumor molecular drivers or primary and acquired resistance to treatment. The International IBC expert panel and IBC International Consortium made a tremendous effort to define IBC as a distinct entity of BC, and they will continue to lead and support the research for this rare and very aggressive disease. Finally, a uniform platform is now required to develop and lead large, multi-arm, proof-of-concept clinical trials that perform rapid, focused, and cost-effective evaluations of potential novel therapeutics in IBC.

Impact of 18F-FDG PET, PET/CT, and PET/MRI on Staging and Management as an Initial Staging Modality in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of 18F-FDG PET, PET/CT, and PET/MRI on staging and management during the initial staging of breast cancer.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases until March 2020 to identify studies that reported the proportion of breast cancer patients whose clinical stage or management were changed after PET scans. The proportion of changes was pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup and metaregression analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity.

RESULTS

We included 29 studies (4276 patients). The pooled proportions of changes in stage and management were 25% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21%-30%) and 18% (95% CI, 14%-23%), respectively. When stage changes were stratified according to initial stage, the pooled proportions were 11% (95% CI, 3%-22%) in stage I, 20% (95% CI, 16%-24%) in stage II, and 34% (95% CI, 27%-42%) in stage III. The relative proportions of intermodality and intention-to-treat changes were 74% and 70%, respectively. Using metaregression analyses, the mean age and the proportion of initial stage III to IV and histologic grade II to III were significant factors affecting the heterogeneity in changes in stage or management.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently available literature suggests that the use of 18F-FDG PET, PET/CT, or PET/MRI leads to significant modification of staging and treatment in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Therefore, there may be a role for routine clinical use of PET imaging for the initial staging of breast cancer.

[18F]FDG PET/CT in the staging of inflammatory breast cancer: A systematic review

Up to 78 % of patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) present with axillary lymph node involvement and up to 40 % with distant metastases. Previous studies indicate that 2-deoxy-2-(¹⁸F)fluoro-d-glucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) might be used for initial staging in patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). In other cancer types, [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT has been demonstrated to be a sensitive technique, providing complementary information on locoregional and distant disease to conventional imaging modalities. This systematic review showed that ¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT detects additional locoregional lymph node metastases and distant metastases in 10.3 % of patients, that were not detected with standard staging imaging. Compared with conventional imaging procedures, [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT had better diagnostic performance for detection of locoregional and distant metastases and should standardly be used in the diagnostic work-up of IBC patients.

Discrepancy between FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in the staging of patients with inflammatory breast cancer: implications for treatment planning

PURPOSE

Optimizing treatment strategies for patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) relies on accurate initial staging. This study compared contrast-enhanced computed tomography (ce-CT) and FDG-PET/CT for initial staging of IBC to determine the frequency of discordance between the two imaging modalities and potential impact on management.

METHODS

81 patients with IBC underwent FDG-PET/CT and ce-CT prior to starting treatment. FDG-PET/CT and ce-CT scans were independently reviewed for locoregional and distant metastases and findings recorded by anatomic site as negative, equivocal, or positive for breast cancer involvement. Each paired ce-CT and FDG-PET/CT case was classified as concordant or discordant for findings. Discordant findings were subclassified as (a) related to the presence or absence of distant metastases; (b) affecting the locoregional radiation therapy plan; or (c) due to incidental findings not related to IBC.

RESULTS

There were 47 discordant findings between ce-CT and FDG-PET/CT in 41 of 81 patients (50.6%). Thirty (63.8%) were related to the presence or absence of distant metastases; most commonly disease detection on FDG-PET/CT but not ce-CT (n = 12). FDG-PET/CT suggested alterations of the locoregional radiation therapy plan designed by CT alone in 15 patients. FDG-PET/CT correctly characterized 5 of 7 findings equivocal for metastatic IBC on ce-CT.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates differences between ce-CT and FDG-PET/CT for initial staging of IBC and how these differences potentially affect patient management. Preliminary data suggest that FDG-PET/CT may be the imaging modality of choice for initial staging of IBC. Prospective trials testing initial staging with FDG-PET/CT versus important clinical end-points in IBC are warranted.

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography in locoregional staging and assessment of biological and clinical aggressiveness of breast cancer subtypes

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the availability of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) in initial axillary lymph node (ALN) staging in breast cancer. The secondary objective is to evaluate the role of FDG PET/CT as a pretest in sentinel lymph node biopsy vs. axillary lymph node dissection when predicting disease aggressiveness.

METHODS

The study evaluated retrospectively 194 breast cancer patients who underwent preoperative 18F-FDG. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of FDG PET/CT for ALN metastases were confirmed with histopathology as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The value of the area under curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity for ALN metastases were determined as 0.847, 78.8% and 92.6%, respectively. The cut-off value of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for metastatic ALN detection was calculated as 1.79. PPV, NPV and the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT were 0.933 (93.3%), 0.75 (75%) and 0.837 (83.7%), respectively. The SUVmax value of the primary lesion was significantly correlated with grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, SUVmax value of metastatic ALN, Her-2 status and Ki-67 level. Molecular subtypes revealed no statistically significant difference in terms of mean SUVmax value.

CONCLUSION

High values of AUC, sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV encourage utilization of PET/CT for locoregional staging of nonmetastatic breast carcinoma. The significant correlation between the primary tumor SUVmax value and grade, ER status, PR status and Ki-67 level increases the prognostic predictive value of the preoperative PET/CT.

Prediction of Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival by the 18F-FDG PET/CT Radiomic Features in Patients with Primary Gastric Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Purpose. To determine whether the radiomic features of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) contribute to prognosis prediction in primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PG-DLBCL) patients. Methods. This retrospective study included 35 PG-DLBCL patients who underwent PET/CT scans at West China Hospital before curative treatment. The volume of interest (VOI) was drawn around the tumor, and radiomic analysis of the PET and CT images, within the same VOI, was conducted. The metabolic and textural features of PET and CT images were evaluated. Correlations of the extracted features with the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the prognostic value of the radiomic parameters. Results. In the univariate model, many of the textural features, including kurtosis and volume, extracted from the PET and CT datasets were significantly associated with survival (5 for OS and 7 for PFS (PET); 7 for OS and 14 for PFS (CT)). Multivariate analysis identified kurtosis (hazard ratio (HR): 28.685, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.067–398.152, p=0.012), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) (HR: 26.152, 95% CI: 2.089–327.392, p=0.011), and gray-level nonuniformity (GLNU) (HR: 14.642, 95% CI: 2.661–80.549, p=0.002) in PET and sphericity (HR: 11.390, 95% CI: 1.360–95.371, p=0.025) and kurtosis (HR: 11.791, 95% CI: 1.583–87.808, p=0.016), gray-level nonuniformity (GLNU) (HR: 6.934, 95% CI: 1.069–44.981, p=0.042), and high gray-level zone emphasis (HGZE) (HR: 9.805, 95% CI: 1.359–70.747, p=0.024) in CT as independent prognostic factors. Conclusion. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT radiomic features are potentially useful for survival prediction in PG-DLBCL patients. However, studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm the clinical prognostication of these parameters.

Assessing 18F-FDG Uptake in the Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT has limited value in early breast cancer. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the current procedure of choice to search for small metastatic deposits in the axillary lymph nodes in early breast cancer. In this retrospective study, we reevaluated ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT images after locating the SLN on PET/CT with the help of SLN SPECT/CT images and assessed ¹⁸F-FDG uptake, particularly in the SLN. Our goal was to understand if combined evaluation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and SLN SPECT/CT could be useful for detecting early lymph node metastasis in the axilla. Methods: ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT images of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who also had SLN scintigraphy (SPECT/CT) and biopsy results were analyzed to assess ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the SLN. The SLN seen on SPECT/CT images was located on PET/CT images, and its metabolic activity was assessed both visually and semiquantitatively using SUV_max ¹⁸F-FDG PET results were compared with the histopathology result for the SLN. Results: Twenty patients among 130 met the inclusion criteria. SLN SPECT/CT images were helpful for locating the SLN on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT images in all 20 patients. Histopathologic analysis of the SLNs demonstrated metastasis in 7 patients and no metastasis in 13. There was mild (visible) ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the SLN (SUV_max, 1.2-4.1; metastatic deposit size, 6-8 mm) in 6 of 7 patients with SLN metastasis (85.7%). There was no or only faint ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the SLN (SUV_max < 1) in 9 of 13 patients with no SLN metastasis (69.2%). Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis indicated that the SUV_max cutoff for differentiating SLN-positive from -negative cases was 0.85 (sensitivity, 85.7%; specificity, 61.5%; area under the curve, 0.747; P < 0.05). Conclusion: Combined evaluation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and SPECT/CT images to assess ¹⁸F-FDG uptake, particularly in the SLN, is a new image analysis technique to detect early metastatic disease in the axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. Although this technique does not currently seem feasible for use in routine practice, mainly because of the limitations of current PET/CT technology in detecting small tumors, it is an interesting image analysis technique to be aware of for possible future use.

Association between MRI Features and Standardized Uptake Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a breast cancer subgroup that lacks the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Certain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of TNBC might reflect the poor prognosis of TNBC. Standardized uptake value (SUV) of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography is 1 of predictive prognostic factors for breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to correlate MRI features of TNBC with SUVmax to determine whether MRI findings in TNBC could be helpful for predicting prognosis.

METHODS

We analyzed MRI findings of TNBC according to breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) MRI lexicon. We also assessed intratumoral high signal intensity on T2-weighted MRI, time-intensity curve analysis and peritumoral edema. The relationship between MRI features of TNBC and SUVmax was then statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Significant correlations of SUVmax with the internal enhancement pattern, intratumoral high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, and peritumoral edema were noted. There was no significant correlation of SUVmax with mass shape, margin, or kinetics.

CONCLUSION

Certain MRI features of TNBC such as heterogeneous or rim enhancement, intratumoral very high signal intensity on T2 images, and peritumoral edema might be useful in predicting the prognosis of patients with TNBC.

18F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer: Evidence-based recommendations in initial staging

Current guidelines do not systematically recommend 18F-FDG PET/CT for breast cancer staging; and the recommendations and level of evidence supporting its use in different groups of patients vary among guidelines. This review summarizes the evidence about the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer staging and the therapeutic and prognostic impact accumulated in the last decade. Other related aspects, such as the association of metabolic information with biology and prognosis are considered and evidence-based recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer staging are offered. We systematically searched MEDLINE for articles reporting studies with at least 30 patients related to clinical questions following the Problem/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome framework. We critically reviewed the selected articles and elaborated evidence tables structuring the summarized information into methodology, results, and limitations. The level of evidence and the grades of recommendation for the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in different contexts are summarized. Level III evidence supports the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging in patients with recently diagnosed breast cancer; the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of the 18F-FDG PET/CT findings is sufficient for a weak recommendation in this population. In patients with locally advanced breast cancer, level II evidence supports the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging; the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of the 18F-FDG PET/CT findings is sufficient for a strong recommendation in this population. In patients with recently diagnosed breast cancer, the metabolic information from baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT is associated with tumor biology and has prognostic implications, supported by level II evidence. In conclusion, 18F-FDG PET/CT is not recommended for staging all patients with early breast cancer, although evidence of improved regional and systemic staging supports its use in locally advanced breast cancer. Baseline tumor glycolytic activity is associated with tumor biology and prognosis.

Planar Bone Scan Versus Computerized Tomography in Staging Locally Advanced Breast Cancer in Asymptomatic Patients: Does Bone Scan Change Patient Management Over Computerized Tomography?

AIM

The Royal College of Radiologists guidelines from 2013 recommend that contrast-enhanced computerized tomography of chest, abdomen and pelvis (CT TAP) for breast cancer patients with suspected metastasis could obviate the need for bone scan in asymptomatic patients. The purpose of this study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of bone scan and CT scan in locally advanced breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of planar bone scan in changing the stage or management of locally advanced breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Between June 2006 and January 2016, 156 breast cancer patients had staging investigations (either CT and bone scans, bone scans only, or CT only). All images and reports on picture archiving and communication system were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

One hundred five of 156 patients had both CT TAP and bone scan within 10 days of each other. Of the total of 105 patients, 33 (31.4%) had concordant normal results on CT TAP and bone scan. There were 18/105 (17.1%) patients with extraosseous metastasis on CT with negative or inconclusive bone scan. Bone scans diagnosed peripheral osseous metastasis in 5/105 (4.7%), which were either skull or extremity metastasis outside CT TAP field of view. All of these 5 patients had other metastatic lesions within axial skeleton or soft tissues on CT and led to no change in patient management.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest routine use of bone scan in asymptomatic patients with locally advanced breast cancer did not change patient management.

Value of fourth and subsequent post-therapy follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT scans in patients with breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy and value of the fourth and subsequent post-therapy follow-up fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) scans in the clinical assessment of breast cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-two female patients, with a total of 426 fourth and subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans, were retrospectively included. Patients were followed for a median of 23.7 months (range, 0.7-124.4) from the fourth follow-up PET/CT. The diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT, its impact on clinical assessment, patients' management, and survival outcome were established.

RESULT

Of the 426 follow-up PET/CT scans, 264 (62%) were interpreted as positive and 162 (38%) were interpreted as negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the fourth and subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans were 97.7, 98.1, 98.8, 96.3, and 97.9%, respectively. Fourth and subsequent follow-up PET/CT were useful in excluding a tumor in 13.4% (39/292) of patients with a clinical suspicion of recurrence and identifying suspected recurrence in 10.5% (14/134) of patients without previous clinical suspicion. A change in management was noted in 6.7% (9/134) of scan times when the scans were performed without previous clinical suspicion of recurrence or therapy response and was 27.7% (81/292) when the scans were performed with clinical suspicion. Overall survival differed significantly between patients with all negative follow-up scans (n=23) and those who had at least one positive follow-up scan (n=69) (hazard ratio of 4.65, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The fourth and subsequent PET/CT scans performed after the completion of primary treatment led to a change in management in 27.7% of patients when the scans were performed with clinical suspicion and only in 6.7% of patients when performed without clinical suspicion or context.

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for Staging and Restaging of Breast Cancer

Many studies have pointed out the role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT (or (18)F-FDG PET) in patients with clinical stage III or II breast cancer. (18)F-FDG PET/CT might advantageously replace other staging procedures, such as bone scanning and possibly contrast-enhanced CT of the thorax or abdomen-pelvis. We discuss the findings, locoregional or distant, that can be expected in different categories of breast cancer and their impact on prognosis and management. We also discuss the role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in restaging and how (18)F-FDG PET/CT compares with conventional techniques in restaging for patients with suspected disease recurrence. We conclude with some recommendations for clinical practice and future research.

Translation of New Molecular Imaging Approaches to the Clinical Setting: Bridging the Gap to Implementation

Molecular imaging with PET is a rapidly emerging technique. In breast cancer patients, more than 45 different PET tracers have been or are presently being tested. With a good rationale, after development of the tracer and proven feasibility, it is of interest to evaluate whether there is a potential meaningful role for the tracer in the clinical setting-such as in staging, in the (early) prediction of a treatment response, or in supporting drug choices. So far, only (18)F-FDG PET has been incorporated into breast cancer guidelines. For proof of the clinical relevance of tracers, especially for analysis in a multicenter setting, standardization of the technology and access to the novel PET tracer are required. However, resources for PET implementation research are limited. Therefore, next to randomized studies, novel approaches are required for proving the clinical value of PET tracers with the smallest possible number of patients. The aim of this review is to describe the process of the development of PET tracers and the level of evidence needed for the use of these tracers in breast cancer. Several breast cancer trials have been performed with the PET tracers (18)F-FDG, 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT), and (18)F-fluoroestradiol ((18)F-FES). We studied them to learn lessons for the implementation of novel tracers. After defining the gap between a good rationale for a tracer and implementation in the clinical setting, we propose solutions to fill the gap to try to bring more PET tracers to daily clinical practice.

Application of positron emission tomography (PET/CT) in diagnosis of breast cancer. Part I. Diagnosis of breast cancer prior to treatment

Positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) is gaining popularity as a method for overall staging assessment of breast cancer. Currently, it is not a part of the routine workup before the beginning of treatment, because of insufficient sensitivity for the detection of small tumors (due to its limited spatial resolution), the heterogeneity of radiotracer uptake by the primary tumor, and unsatisfactory sensitivity in detection of lymph node metastases (particularly when they are small). Nevertheless, it should be considered when there is a high risk of metastases, because then initial PET/CT examination allows for accurate staging and may change the treatment algorithm in up to almost 50% of stage III patients, due to detection of distant and lymph node metastases throughout the whole body. Despite the discussed limitations of PET/CT, there is ongoing research concerning the recommendations for the examination prior to treatment. For a particular group of patients with high risk of metastases, PET/CT may be expected to become a part of the routine workup as the most appropriate staging method.

Role of bone scan in addition to CT in patients with breast cancer selected for systemic staging

Background

The majority of women with breast cancer present with localized disease. The optimal strategy for identifying patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional diagnostic yield from isotope bone scanning when added to CT staging of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis (CT-TAP) in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Methods

All patients diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent staging CT-TAP and bone scan between 2011 and 2013 were identified from a prospective database of a tertiary referral breast cancer centre that provides a symptomatic and population-based screening breast service. Criteria for staging included: biopsy-proven axillary nodal metastases; planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy or mastectomy; locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer and symptoms suggestive of metastases.

Results

A total of 631 patients underwent staging by CT-TAP and bone scan. Of these, 69 patients (10·9 per cent) had distant metastasis at presentation, with disease confined to a single organ in 49 patients (71 per cent) and 20 (29 per cent) having metastatic deposits in multiple organs. Bone metastasis was the most common site; 39 of 49 patients had bone metastasis alone and 12 had a single isolated metastatic deposit. All but two of these were to the axial skeleton. No preoperative histological factors identified a cohort of patients at risk of metastatic disease. Omission of the bone scan in systemic staging would have resulted in a false-negative rate of 0·8 per cent.

Conclusion

For patients diagnosed with breast cancer, CT-TAP is a satisfactory stand-alone investigation for systemic staging.

PET Imaging of Breast Cancer: Role in Patient Management

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in females. Imaging plays a critical role in diagnosis, staging and surveillance, and management of disease. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET the imaging is indicated in specific clinical setting. Sensitivity of detection depends on tumor histology and size. Whole body FDG PET can change staging and management. In recurrent disease, distant metastasis can be detected. FDG PET imaging has prognostic and predictive value. PET/MR is evolving rapidly and may play a role management, assessment of metastatic lesions, and treatment monitoring. This review discusses current PET modalities, focusing on of FDG PET imaging and novel tracers.

18F-FDG PET/CT to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Prognosis in Inflammatory Breast Cancer

The aim of this prospective study was to assess the predictive value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging for pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and outcome in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients.

METHODS

Twenty-three consecutive patients (51 y ± 12.7) with newly diagnosed IBC, assessed by PET/CT at baseline (PET1), after the third course of NACT (PET2), and before surgery (PET3), were included. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to pathologic response as assessed by the Sataloff classification: pathologic complete response for complete responders (stage TA and NA or NB) and non-pathologic complete response for noncomplete responders (not stage A for tumor or not stage NA or NB for lymph nodes). In addition to maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measurements, a global breast metabolic tumor volume (MTV) was delineated using a semiautomatic segmentation method. Changes in SUVmax and MTV between PET1 and PET2 (ΔSUV1-2; ΔMTV1-2) and PET1 and PET3 (ΔSUV1-3; ΔMTV1-3) were measured.

RESULTS

Mean SUVmax on PET1, PET2, and PET3 did not statistically differ between the 2 pathologic response groups. On receiver-operating-characteristic analysis, a 72% cutoff for ΔSUV1-3 provided the best performance to predict residual disease, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 61%, 80%, and 65%, respectively. On univariate analysis, the 72% cutoff for ΔSUV1-3 was the best predictor of distant metastasis-free survival (P = 0.05). On multivariate analysis, the 72% cutoff for ΔSUV1-3 was an independent predictor of distant metastasis-free survival (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our results emphasize the good predictive value of change in SUVmax between baseline and before surgery to assess pathologic response and survival in IBC patients undergoing NACT.

Axillary Lymph Node-to-Primary Tumor Standard Uptake Value Ratio on Preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT: A Prognostic Factor for Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer

Purpose

This study assessed the axillary lymph node (ALN)-to-primary tumor maximum standard uptake value (SUV_max) ratio (ALN/T SUV ratio) in invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC) on preoperative ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) to determine the effectiveness in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Methods

One hundred nineteen IDC patients (mean age, 50.5±10.5 years) with pathologically proven ALN involvement without distant metastasis and preoperative FDG PET/CT were enrolled in the study. SUV_max values of the ALN and primary tumor were obtained on FDG PET/CT, and ALN/T SUV ratio was calculated. Several factors were evaluated for their effectiveness in predicting RFS. These included several parameters on FDG PET/CT as well as several clinicopathological parameters: pathologic tumor/node stage; nuclear and histological grade; hormonal state; status with respect to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, mindbomb E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 (MIB-1), and p53; primary tumor size; and ALN size.

Results

Among 119 patients with breast cancer, 17 patients (14.3%) experienced relapse during follow-up (mean follow-up, 28.4 months). The ALN/T SUV ratio of the group with disease recurrence was higher than that of the group without recurrence (0.97±1.60 and 0.45±0.40, respectively, p=0.005). Univariate analysis showed that the primary tumor SUV_max, ALN SUV_max, ALN/T SUV ratio, ALN status, nuclear and histological grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, and MIB-1 status were predictors for RFS. Among these variables, ALN/T SUV ratio with hazard ratio of 4.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.74-10.13) and ER status with hazard ratio of 4.33 (95% CI, 1.06-17.71) were predictors for RFS according to multivariate analysis (p=0.002 and p=0.042, respectively).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that ALN/T SUV ratio together with ER status was an independent factor for predicting relapse in IDC with metastatic ALN. ALN/T SUV ratio on preoperative FDG PET/CT may be a useful marker for selecting IDC patients that need adjunct treatment to prevent recurrence.

Use of (99m)Tc-doxorubicin scintigraphy in females with breast cancer: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Doxorubicin (Eurofarma, São Paulo, Brazil) is an antitumour agent widely used in the treatment of breast cancer and can be used for tumour tracking when labelled with a radionuclide. Here, we present the results obtained with technetium-99m ((99m)Tc)-doxorubicin, using the direct method, to evaluate its uptake in breast cancer.

METHODS

Four females with confirmed breast carcinoma diagnosis and breast image reporting and data system Category 5 on mammography underwent whole-body and thorax single-photon emission CT/CT imaging 1 and 3 h after (99m)Tc-doxorubicin administration.

RESULTS

We observed increased uptake in breast carcinoma lesions and elimination via renal and hepatic pathways.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results suggest that (99m)Tc-doxorubicin may be a promising radiopharmaceutical for the evaluation of patients with breast cancer. Further studies are ongoing.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the use of a directly labelled doxorubicin tracer in humans. (99m)Tc-doxorubicin could provide information on the response of tumours to doxorubicin.

(18) F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging in breast cancer patients - Is there a relevant impact on treatment planning compared to conventional staging modalities?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of whole-body (18) F-FDG PET/CT on initial staging of breast cancer in comparison to conventional staging modalities.

METHODS

This study included 102 breast cancer patients, 101 patients were eligible for evaluation. Preoperative whole-body staging with PET/CT was performed in patients with clinical stage ≥ T2 tumours or positive local lymph nodes (n = 91). Postoperative PET/CT was performed in patients without these criteria but positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (n = 10). All patients underwent PET/CT and a conventional staging algorithm, which included bone scan, chest X-ray and abdominal ultrasound. PET/CT findings were compared to conventional staging and the impact on therapeutic management was evaluated.

RESULTS

PET/CT led to an upgrade of the N or M stage in overall 19 patients (19 %) and newly identified manifestation of breast cancer in two patients (2 %). PET/CT findings caused a change in treatment of 11 patients (11 %). This is within the range of recent studies, all applying conventional inclusion criteria based on the initial T and N status.

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT has a relevant impact on initial staging and treatment of breast cancer when compared to conventional modalities. Further studies should assess inclusion criteria beyond the conventional T and N status, e.g. tumour grading and receptor status.

KEY POINTS

• PET/CT may be relevant in staging breast cancer patients at higher risk for metastases • PET/CT may modify the N and M stage in multiple patients • PET/CT may impact treatment planning in breast cancer patients.

Retrospective analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging asymptomatic breast cancer patients younger than 40 years

National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines consider (18)F-FDG PET/CT for only clinical stage III breast cancer patients. However, there is debate whether TNM staging should be the only factor in considering if PET/CT is warranted. Patient age may be an additional consideration, because young breast cancer patients often have more aggressive tumors with potential for earlier metastases. This study assessed PET/CT for staging of asymptomatic breast cancer patients younger than 40 y.

METHODS

In this Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study, our hospital information system was screened for breast cancer patients younger than 40 y who underwent staging PET/CT before any treatment. Patients with symptoms or conventional imaging findings suggestive of distant metastases or with prior malignancy were excluded. Initial stage was based on physical examination, mammography, ultrasound, and breast MR imaging. PET/CT was then evaluated to identify unsuspected extraaxillary regional nodal and distant metastases.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four patients with initial breast cancer stage I to IIIC met inclusion criteria. PET/CT findings led to upstaging to stage III or IV in 28 patients (21%). Unsuspected extraaxillary regional nodes were found in 15 of 134 patients (11%) and distant metastases in 20 of 134 (15%), with 7 of 134 (5%) demonstrating both. PET/CT revealed stage IV disease in 1 of 20 (5%) patients with initial clinical stage I, 2 of 44 (5%) stage IIA, 8 of 47 (17%) stage IIB, 4 of 13 (31%) stage IIIA, 4 of 8 (50%) stage IIIB, and 1 of 2 (50%) stage IIIC. All 20 patients upstaged to stage IV were histologically confirmed. Four synchronous thyroid and 1 rectal malignancies were identified.

CONCLUSION

PET/CT revealed distant metastases in 17% of asymptomatic stage IIB breast cancer patients younger than 40 y. Although guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend against systemic staging in patients with stage II disease, our data suggest that PET/CT might be valuable in younger patients with stage IIB and III disease. Use of PET/CT in younger patients has the potential to reduce the morbidity and cost of unnecessary therapies in young breast cancer patients.

Benign breast lesions detected by positron emission tomography-computed tomography

(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) is widely used in the initial staging and response evaluation of patients with malignancy. This review describes a spectrum of benign breast findings incidentally detected by FDG PET-CT at staging that may be misinterpreted as malignancy. We describe the pattern of distribution and intensity of FDG uptake in a spectrum of benign breast diseases with their corresponding typical morphological imaging characteristics to help the nuclear medicine physician and/or general radiologist identify benign lesions, avoiding unnecessary breast imaging work-up and biopsies.

Special Relevance of FDG-PET as an Upfront Diagnostic Modality at Initial Diagnosis and in Suspected Recurrence in Patients of Breast Carcinoma Hailing From Lower Socioeconomic Status Owing to Relative Late Presentation: A Pilot Study in a Medical College Hospital Setting in India

FDG-PET has found relatively limited use in routine management of breast carcinoma due to its limited utility in assessing the primary and axillary lymph node status. The aim of the study was to assess its role in a medical school and municipal hospital setting of Mumbai, where majority belongs to the lower socioeconomic status and presents relatively late and hence whole body FDG-PET could find important place for assessing whole body disease status that would justify being used upfront in this group of patients. Thus, the premise of this study was that FDG-PET will have special relevance in this particular setting for evaluation of patients of breast carcinoma with respect to initial staging, detection of locoregional recurrence and metastasis and assessing response to systemic treatment. A total of 52 patients proven to have breast carcinoma, who had undergone (18)F FDG-PET for disease staging at initial diagnosis and in in recurrent disease staging with a few cases as a baseline study for early treatment monitoring purposes over a study period of 3 years, were included in this analysis. 33.3 % of patients with pretreatment baseline FDG-PET were upstaged with diagnosis of additional lesions in the adrenal gland, liver, internal mammary, cervical lymph nodes and the mediastinum. On a lesion specific analysis, the percentage of increased lesion detection (including both lymph node with distant metastasis) by FDG-PET was 42.7 %. FDG-PET was found to be 100 % sensitive and specific for confirming recurrent breast cancer. Four out of 18 patients on chemotherapy underwent second FDG-PET after first cycle of chemotherapy, showed responsiveness to chemotherapy by decreased maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). FDG-PET showed 9 liver lesions in 6 patients, only 3 of them was reported in USG. In one patient USG abdomen was inconclusive between hemangioma and metastasis, FDG-PET ruled out liver metastasis in this patient. In the examined patient population belonging to lower socioeconomic status, where usual presentation is relatively late, upfront whole body survey with FDG-PET or PET/CT is of considerable value in view of higher probability of existence of metastatic disease, thus can be an important one-stop shop tool in assessing whole body disease status in a single examination. It also proved efficacious in diagnosing loco regional and distant recurrence, metabolic characterization of lump and early response to treatment in the examined few cases following one cycle of chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

Role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer

Although positron emission tomography (PET) imaging may not be used in the diagnosis of breast cancer, the use of PET/computed tomography is imperative in all aspects of breast cancer staging, treatment, and follow-up. PET will continue to be relevant in personalized medicine because accurate tumor status will be even more critical during and after the transition from a generic metabolic agent to receptor imaging. Positron emission mammography is an imaging proposition that may have benefits in lower doses, but its use is limited without new radiopharmaceuticals.

(18)F-FDG PET/CT predicts survival in patients with inflammatory breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in predicting overall survival in inflammatory breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Included in this retrospective study were 53 patients with inflammatory breast cancer who had at least two PET/CT studies including a baseline study before the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the effects on survival of the following factors: tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) at baseline, preoperatively and at follow-up, decrease in tumor SUVmax, histological tumor type, grade, estrogen, progesterone, HER2/neu receptor status, and extent of disease at presentation including axillary nodal and distant metastases.

RESULTS

By univariate analysis, survival was significantly associated with decrease in tumor SUVmax and tumor receptor status. Patients with decrease in tumor SUVmax had better survival (P = 0.02). Patients with a triple-negative tumor (P = 0.0006), a Her2/neu-negative tumor (P = 0.038) or an ER-negative tumor (P = 0.039) had worse survival. Multivariate analysis confirmed decrease in tumor SUVmax and triple-negative receptor status as significant predictors of survival. Every 10% decrease in tumor SUVmax from baseline translated to a 15% lower probability of death, and complete resolution of tumor FDG uptake translated to 80% lower probability of death (P = 0.014). Patients with a triple-negative tumor had 4.11 times higher probability of death (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Decrease in tumor SUVmax is an independent predictor of survival in patients with inflammatory breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further investigation with prospective studies is warranted to clarify its role in assessing response and altering therapy.

Clinical application of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer

Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is not suited for primary diagnostics of breast tumours and it cannot replace sentinel lymph node technique in determining metastases to the axilla. PET/CT has a high sensitivity and specificity regarding the detection of loco-regional recurrence and metastases to mediastinal and internal mammary lymph nodes, as well as distant metastases. Whether the method can replace conventional methods, or be a supplement when this is non-conclusive, remains unresolved. PET/CT cannot be recommended for routine follow-up but is recommended in patients with suspected relapse when conventional imaging has given equivocal results. PET/CT can be applied to confirm isolated loco-regional relapse or metastatic lesion detected by conventional imaging. PET/CT has a high sensitivity for detecting response to treatment, but a low specificity calls for cautions. Further investigations into the use of PET/CT to predict and monitor response are warranted, before this approach may find its way into a clinical setting. In the future, PET/CT will probably find increasing use in treatment planning and evaluation of patients with breast cancer.