Clinical Applications of Dedicated Breast Positron Emission Tomography

Breast-specific positron imaging systems provide higher sensitivity than whole-body PET for breast cancer detection. The clinical applications for breast-specific positron imaging are similar to breast MRI including preoperative local staging and neoadjuvant therapy response assessment. Breast-specific positron imaging may be an alternative for patients who cannot undergo breast MRI. Further research is needed in expanding the field-of-view for posterior breast lesions, increasing biopsy capability, and reducing radiation dose. Efforts are also necessary for developing appropriate use criteria, increasing availability, and advancing insurance coverage.

Molecular Breast Imaging and Positron Emission Mammography

There is growing interest in application of functional imaging modalities for adjunct breast imaging due to their unique ability to evaluate molecular/pathophysiologic changes, not visible by standard anatomic breast imaging. This has led to increased use of nuclear medicine dedicated breast-specific single photon and coincidence imaging systems for multiple indications, such as supplemental screening, staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant treatment, diagnosis of local disease recurrence in the breast, and problem solving. Studies show that these systems maybe especially useful for specific subsets of patients, not well served by available anatomic breast imaging modalities.

Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: Recent Advances in Imaging and Current Limitations

Breast cancer detection has a significant impact on population health. Although there are many breast imaging modalities, mammography is the predominant tool for breast cancer screening. The introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis to mammography has contributed to increased cancer detection rates and decreased recall rates. In average-risk women, starting annual screening mammography at age 40 years has demonstrated the highest mortality reduction. In intermediate- and high-risk women as well as in those with dense breasts, additional modalities, including MRI, ultrasound, and molecular breast imaging, can also be considered for adjunct screening to improve the detection of mammographically occult malignancy.

Dedicated Breast Gamma Camera Imaging and Breast PET: Current Status and Future Directions

Recent advances in nuclear medicine instrumentation have led to the emergence of improved molecular imaging techniques to image breast cancer: dedicated gamma cameras using γ-emitting ^99mTc-sestamibi and breast-specific PET cameras using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose. This article focuses on the current role of such approaches in the clinical setting including diagnosis, assessing local extent of disease, monitoring response to therapy, and, for gamma camera imaging, possible supplemental screening in women with dense breasts. Barriers to clinical adoption and technologies and radiotracers under development are also discussed.

Overview of Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis

Screening mammography saves lives. The mainstay of screening has been mammography. Multiple alternative options, however, for supplemental imaging are now available. Some are just improved anatomic delineation whereas others include physiology added to anatomy. A third group (molecular imaging) is purely physiologic. This article describes and compares the available options and for which patient populations they should be used.

Usefulness of positron emission mammography in the evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer

Our study examines the association between two Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) semi-quantitative parameters: PUVmax (maximum uptake value) and LTB (lesion to background) baseline and the end of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with pathologic response in each of the following breast cancer subtype: Triple negative breast cancer (TPN), HER2-positive, and ER-positive/HER2-negative cancers. One-hundred and eight patients, 71 with invasive ductal carcinoma and 37 with infiltrating lobular carcinoma were evaluate with ¹⁸F-FDG-PEM scans before and after of NAC. We assessed the impact of 2 PEM semi-quantitative parameters for molecular subtype correlated with pathologic response according Miller-Payne grade (MPG). After NAC, an overall reduction of 2 PEM semi-quantitative parameters was found. Neither breast cancer subtypes nor Ki67 modified chemotherapy responses. Compared to PUVmax, an overall increase of LTB was found in baseline condition, independent of the expressed immunophenotype. Post-treatment values of PUVmax revealed a significant reduction compared to baseline values (4.8 ± 0.26 vs. 1.9 ± 0.18; P < 0.001) and LTB exhibited a significant decay after the first course of NAC (15.8 ± 1.36 vs. 5.5 ± 0.49; P < 0.001). Using the Kruskal-Wallis H test which showed no correlation between the different molecular subtypes and the MPG and PUVmax and LTB (P = 0.52). Two PEM semi-quantitative parameters demonstrated a statically significant correlation and equivalence across the different breast cancer subtypes correlated with pathologic response according to MPG. PEM did not allow for prediction of NAC response in terms of breast cancer biomarkers, it is not discarded that this technology might be helpful for individual treatment stratification in breast cancer.

Use of Breast-Specific PET Scanners and Comparison with MR Imaging

The goals of this article are to discuss the role of breast-specific PET imaging of women with breast cancer, compare the clinical performance of positron emission mammography (PEM) and MR imaging for current indications, and provide recommendations for when women should undergo PEM instead of breast MR imaging.

Developments in Breast Imaging: Update on New and Evolving MR Imaging and Molecular Imaging Techniques

This article reviews new developments in breast imaging. There is growing interest in creating a shorter, less expensive MR protocol with broader applicability. There is an increasing focus on and consideration for the additive impact that functional analysis of breast pathology have on identifying and characterizing lesions. These developments apply to MR imaging and molecular imaging. This article reviews evolving breast imaging techniques with attention to strengths, weaknesses, and applications of these approaches. We aim to give the reader familiarity with the state of current developments in the field and to increase awareness of what to expect in breast imaging.

Optimization of a large-area detector-block based on SiPM and pixelated LYSO crystal arrays

We present the performance evaluation of a large-area detector module based on the ArrayC-60035-64P, an 8×8 array of tileable, 7.2mm pitch, silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) by SensL, covering a total area of 57.4mm×57.4mm. We characterized the ArrayC-60035-64P, operating at room temperature, using LYSO pixelated crystal arrays of different pitch sizes (1.075, 1.430, 1.683, 2.080 and 2.280mm) to determine the resolvable crystal size. After an optimization process, a 7mm thick coupling light guide was used for all crystal pitches. To identify the interaction position a 16-channel (8 columns, 8 rows) symmetric charge division (SCD) readout board together with a center-of-gravity algorithm was used. Based on this, we assembled the detector modules using a 40×40 LYSO, 1.43mm pitch array, covering the total detector area. Calibration was performed using a ¹³⁷Cs source resulting in excellent crystal maps with minor geometric distortion, a mean 4.1 peak-to-valley ratio and 9.6% mean energy resolution for 662keV photons in the central region. The resolvability index was calculated in the x and y directions with values under 0.42 in all cases. We show that these large area SiPM arrays, combined with a 16-channel SCD readout board, can offer high spatial resolution, without processing a big number of signals, attaining excellent energy resolution and detector uniformity.

A preliminary report of breast cancer screening by positron emission mammography

OBJECTIVE

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) have had a considerable impact on the detection of various malignancies. PET and PET/CT are minimally invasive methods that can provide whole-body imaging at one time. Therefore, an FDG-PET cancer screening program has been widely used in Japan. However, the breast cancer detection rate of FDG-PET cancer screening is relatively low. Therefore, FDG-PET screening is not recommended for breast cancer screening. Positron emission mammography (PEM) is a high-resolution molecular breast imaging technology. PEM can detect small breast cancers that cannot be detected on PET or PET/CT images due to limited spatial resolution. We have performed opportunistic breast cancer screening using PEM since 2011. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report regarding PEM breast cancer screening.

METHODS

This study enrolled 265 women. PEM images were analyzed by agreement of 2 experienced nuclear medicine physicians. The readers were given information from medical interview sheet. US findings were interpreted holistically. The number of participants, patient recall rate, further examination rate, and cancer detection rate by year were calculated.

RESULTS

The overall recall rate was 8.3%; the work-up examination rate was 77.3%, and cancer detection rate was 2.3%. The positive predictive value of PEM was 27.3%. Six cancers were found by PEM screening. Five were invasive cancers and one was ductal carcinoma in situ. Histological tumor sizes were reported in three cases: 0.7, 1.2, and 2 cm.

CONCLUSION

PEM screening appears to have potential for breast cancer screening.

Role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer

Although positron emission tomography (PET) imaging may not be used in the diagnosis of breast cancer, the use of PET/computed tomography is imperative in all aspects of breast cancer staging, treatment, and follow-up. PET will continue to be relevant in personalized medicine because accurate tumor status will be even more critical during and after the transition from a generic metabolic agent to receptor imaging. Positron emission mammography is an imaging proposition that may have benefits in lower doses, but its use is limited without new radiopharmaceuticals.

Is imaging the extremities with PEM feasible? A novel application for a high-resolution positron emission scanner

INTRODUCTION

Positron emission mammography (PEM) has better spatial resolution than positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), or PET/CT. We evaluated the feasibility of extremity imaging with PEM using PET as a standard.

METHODS/MATERIALS

Fourteen patients underwent sequential PET/CT and PEM.

RESULTS/DISCUSSION

PEM visualized with equal or improved resolution all of the lesions identified on PET/CT. It often provided additional information such improved uptake localization and also visualized activity in an adjacent structures that was not seen on PET/CT or magnetic resonance imaging. We believe PEM can image the extremities in diseases like melanoma, arthritis and osteomyelitis and patients with metallic hardware.