1
|
Jang WI, Jo S, Moon JE, Bae SH, Park HC. The Current Evidence of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4914. [PMID: 37894281 PMCID: PMC10605127 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), an advanced RT technique, is a considerable treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the distinguishing features of IMRT for HCC have not yet been clearly defined. A systematic review was performed according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The PubMed/MedLine, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and KoreaMed were used to screen eligible studies focusing on treatment outcomes after IMRT for HCC until 18 April 2023. A total of 1755 HCC patients receiving IMRT among 29 studies from 2009 to 2023 were selected for the meta-analysis. The median proportion of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C was 100% (range: 38-100%). Nineteen studies used combined treatment. Pooled rates of response and 1-year local control were 58% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50-65%) and 84% (95% CI, 70-94%), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 13 months (range: 5-45 months), and pooled 1- and 3-year OS rates were 59% (95% CI, 52-66%), and 23% (95% CI, 14-33%), respectively. Pooled rates of classic radiation-induced liver disease (RILD), nonclassic RILD, and hepatic toxicity ≥ grade 3 were 2%, 4%, and 4%, respectively. Although most patients had advanced-stage HCC and combined treatment was commonly used, IMRT for HCC showed similar survival to existing RT modalities and relatively low severe toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Won Il Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, 75, Nowon-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01812, Republic of Korea;
| | - Sunmi Jo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, 875, Haeun-daero, Haeundae-gu, Busan 48108, Republic of Korea;
| | - Ji Eun Moon
- Department of Biostatistics, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, 170 Jomaru-ro, Wongmi-gu, Bucheon-si 14584, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea;
| | - Sun Hyun Bae
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, 170 Jomaru-ro, Wongmi-gu, Bucheon-si 14584, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang H, Zhu X, Zhao Y, Dong D, Li L, Cai Y, Li Y, Wang W. Phase 1 trial of apatinib combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:771. [PMID: 35840914 PMCID: PMC9287866 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09819-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of apatinib delivered during and after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods Patients with unresectable HCC who were not eligible for radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), or residual/ recurrent after the prior local treatment were enrolled. Patients were scheduled to be treated with IMRT at 50–60 Gy/25–30 fractions. Oral apatinib tablets were administered concurrently with IMRT and continued thereafter. We used a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, with three dose levels of apatinib (250, 500, and 750 mg). Grade 3 or more severe adverse events (AEs) were defined as dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The treatment response was calculated using the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. Results Nine patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage C were included. One patient withdrew from the apatinib 250 mg group and another patient was added. No DLTs occurred in the apatinib 250 mg group. Five patients were included in the apatinib 500 mg group, and 2 cases of DLT (grade 3 leukopenia) were found among them. Dose escalation was terminated and the MTD was determined to be 250 mg. Common grade 1–2 AEs included fatigue, hypertension, dizziness, bone marrow suppression, and hyperbilirubinemia. The median follow-up time for all patients was 16.0 months. Three patients achieved complete response and another three achieved partial response. The objective response rate was 6/9 (66.7%), and the disease control rate was 9/9 (100%). Three patients relapsed out of the radiation field. The median progression-free survival was 17.0 months, and the median overall survival was 16.7 months. Conclusions When combined with IMRT, apatinib 250 mg daily was recommended for a phase 2 study of unresectable HCC. The antitumor activity of the combination treatment was encouraging. The safety and efficacy of apatinib combined with IMRT for unresectable HCC should be further investigated in future studies. Trial registration Registration No. ChiCTR1800018309. Registered 11 September 2018. Retrospectively registered, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=30461. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09819-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongzhi Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fu-cheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Xianggao Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fu-cheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuting Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fu-cheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Dezuo Dong
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fu-cheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Lijuan Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fu-cheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Yong Cai
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fu-cheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongheng Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fu-cheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Weihu Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52 Fu-cheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lewis S, Dawson L, Barry A, Stanescu T, Mohamad I, Hosni A. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: from infancy to ongoing maturity. JHEP Rep 2022; 4:100498. [PMID: 35860434 PMCID: PMC9289870 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shirley Lewis
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Laura Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Aisling Barry
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Teodor Stanescu
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Issa Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Centre, Jordan
| | - Ali Hosni
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
- Corresponding author. Address: Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang KL, Chi MS, Ko HL, Huang YY, Huang SC, Lin YM, Chi KH. Axitinib in combination with radiotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase I clinical trial. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:18. [PMID: 33472666 PMCID: PMC7819176 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01742-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of axitinib, a selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1-3 inhibitor, in combination with radiotherapy (RT) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS This phase I study followed the rule of traditional 3 + 3 design. Major eligibility included: (1) patients with advanced HCC unsuitable for surgery, radiofrequency ablation or transarterial chemoembolization, or who failed after prior local-regional treatment; (2) failure on sorafenib or no grant for sorafenib from health insurance system. Eligible patients with advanced HCC received axitinib for total 8 weeks during and after RT. Three cohorts with axitinib dose escalation were planned: 1 mg twice daily (level I), 2 mg twice daily (level II) and 3 mg twice daily (level III). The prescribed doses of RT ranged from 37.5 to 67.5 Gy in 15 fractions to liver tumor(s) and were determined based on an upper limit of mean liver dose of 18 Gy (intended isotoxic RT for normal liver). The primary endpoint was MTD of axitinib in combination with RT. The secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), RT in-field response rate, acute and late toxicities, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). RESULTS Total nine eligible patients received axitinib dose levels of 1 mg twice daily (n = 3), 2 mg twice daily (n = 3) and 3 mg twice daily (n = 3). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) did not occur in the 3 cohorts; the MTD was defined as 3 mg twice daily in this study. ORR was 66.7%, including 3 complete responses and 3 partial responses, at 3 months after treatment initiation. With a median follow-up of 16.6 months, median OS was not reached, 1-year OS was 66.7%, and median PFS was 7.4 months. CONCLUSIONS Axitinib in combination with RT for advanced HCC was well tolerated with an axitinib MTD of 3 mg twice daily in this study. The outcome analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the small total cohort. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02814461), Registered June 27, 2016-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02814461.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Lin Yang
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Shih-Lin District, No. 95, Wen-Chang Road, Taipei City, 111, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, No. 510, Chung-Cheng Road, Hsin-Chuang, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Mau-Shin Chi
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Shih-Lin District, No. 95, Wen-Chang Road, Taipei City, 111, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Ling Ko
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Shih-Lin District, No. 95, Wen-Chang Road, Taipei City, 111, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Ying Huang
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Shih-Lin District, No. 95, Wen-Chang Road, Taipei City, 111, Taiwan
| | - Su-Chen Huang
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Shih-Lin District, No. 95, Wen-Chang Road, Taipei City, 111, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Min Lin
- School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, No. 510, Chung-Cheng Road, Hsin-Chuang, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Kwan-Hwa Chi
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Shih-Lin District, No. 95, Wen-Chang Road, Taipei City, 111, Taiwan.
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, No. 155, Sec. 2, Linong Street, Beitou District, Taipei City, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pérez-Romasanta LA, González-Del Portillo E, Rodríguez-Gutiérrez A, Matías-Pérez Á. Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Radiosensitization Strategies and Radiation-Immunotherapy Combination. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13020192. [PMID: 33430362 PMCID: PMC7825787 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiotherapy is rapidly turning into a crucial component of multidisciplinary treatment for liver cancer because many patients are not surgical treatment candidates. Thanks to technical developments, radiotherapy have achieved high precision treatments, making it possible to eliminate tumor cells without severe damage to the liver and other organs. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy is an advanced radiotherapy technique able to eradicate malignant tumors wherever they are located in properly selected patients. The best use of radiotherapy, the most fruitful radiotherapy strategy, and the best way to combine it with other treatments for liver cancer are largely unknown. Radiosensitizers, agents that can potentiate radiotherapy, could broaden the radiotherapeutic landscape. Radiotherapy potentiation can be achieved with diverse treatments, not only drugs but also nanoparticles. In order to clear up the performance of radiotherapy in liver cancer management in the future and the best ways to potentiate its effects, considerable medical research is needed. Abstract Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging ablative modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Most patients with HCC have advanced disease at the time of diagnosis, and therefore, are not candidates for definitive-intent therapies such as resection or transplantation. For this reason, various alternative local and regional therapies have been used to prevent disease progression, palliate symptoms, and delay liver failure. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is a non-invasive technique of delivering ablative doses of radiation to tumors while sparing normal or non-tumor hepatic tissue. Incorporation of SBRT in multidisciplinary HCC management is gradual, initially applied when other liver-directed therapies have failed or are contraindicated, and tried in combination with other locoregional or systemic therapies for more unfavorable conditions by more experienced teams. In order to improve SBRT therapeutic ratio, there has been much interest in augmenting the effect of radiation on tumors by combining it with chemotherapy, molecularly targeted therapeutics, nanoparticles, and immunotherapy. This review aims to synthesize available evidence to evaluate the clinical feasibility and efficacy of SBRT for HCC, and to explore novel radio-potentiation concepts by combining SBRT with novel therapeutics. It is expected that those approaches would result in improved therapeutic outcomes, even though many questions remain with regard to the optimal way to assemble treatments. Further trials are needed to evaluate and consolidate these promising therapies for HCC.
Collapse
|
6
|
Han S, Lee HW, Park JY, Kim SU, Kim DY, Ahn SH, Han KH, Seong J, Won JY, Han DH, Kim BK. Appraisal of Long-Term Outcomes of Liver-Directed Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Portal Vein Invasion. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2020; 7:403-412. [PMID: 33365287 PMCID: PMC7751588 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s276528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds and Aims Molecular-targeted agents are acceptable standards to treat advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), however, their therapeutic benefit, ie, sorafenib, was significantly offset in case of major vessel invasion. Liver-directed concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (LD-CCRT) provided favorable outcomes in terms of survivals and tumor shrinkage, so, we appraised its long-term therapeutic efficacy. Patients and Methods Advanced HCC patients with portal vein invasion (main trunk or the 1st order branch) were enrolled. During a 5-week radiotherapy course, concurrent hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin was administered through an implanted port on the first and last 5 days. Four weeks after LD-CCRT, a maintenance HAIC using 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin was administered every 4 weeks. Results Among 152 patients, the objective response rates as the best response by modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors were 48.0% after LD-CCRT and 55.3% during subsequent HAIC maintenance. After LD-CCRT, biological responses in alpha-fetoprotein and protein induced by the absence of vitamin K or antagonist-II levels were achieved in 46.2% and 52.6%, respectively. Sixteen patients (10.5%) underwent curative resection or liver transplantation after down-staging. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 13.5 and 6.9 months, respectively. Conclusion LD-CCRT followed by maintenance HAIC yielded favorable survival outcomes in advanced HCC patients with major portal vein invasion. Through initial tumor reduction, LD-CCRT induced down-staging with subsequent curative treatment feasible in 10.5% of patients, resulting in long-term survival. Further prospective trials are warranted to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sojung Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye Won Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Yong Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Up Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Do Young Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Hoon Ahn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang-Hyub Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Yun Won
- Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dai Hoon Han
- Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Liver Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Beom Kyung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) has improved efficacy and safety with advancements in technology and techniques. EBRT plays an important role in management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In resectable cases, EBRT serves as a bridge to transplantation or improves local control through adjuvant radiotherapy. In unresectable patients, EBRT offers high local control rates. In metastatic settings, EBRT provides effective palliation. This review presents an overview of radiotherapy treatment modalities used for HCC, current treatment guidelines for the role of EBRT in HCC, clinical outcomes between various EBRT approaches and other locoregional treatments for HCC, and the future role of EBRT for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chien Peter Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Scripps Radiation Therapy Center, 10670 John Jay Hopkins Drive, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shi F, Wang C, Kong Y, Yang L, Li J, Zhu G, Guo J, Zheng Q, Zhang B, Wang S. Assessing the Survival Benefit of Surgery and Various Types of Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Evidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registries. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2020; 7:201-218. [PMID: 33117754 PMCID: PMC7585265 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s272813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the survival benefit of surgery and radiation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after adjusting for patient-specific and tumor-specific factors. Methods This study analyzed HCC patients who enrolled in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry between January 2004 and December 2013. Of the 5552 HCC patients, 4597 received surgery and 955 received radiation. Patients who received radiation were further divided into 3 subgroups: 541 who received beam radiation (BR), 197 who received radioactive implants (RI), and 217 who received radioisotopes (RIT). Propensity score weighting analysis derived from generalized boosted models (GBMs) was performed to ensure well-balanced characteristics in all comparison groups. Results Overall survival rates and HCC-specific survival rates were higher in those receiving surgery compared with those receiving radiotherapy. This was confirmed by Cox proportional hazard regression both before and after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Before IPTW, the RIT group had a better outcome than the BR group in terms of overall and HCC-specific survival rates, but there was no significant difference between the RI and BR groups. After IPTW, Cox proportional hazard regression demonstrated that both the RIT and RI groups had higher survival rates than the BR group. Conclusion In HCC patients, surgery was associated with higher survival rates compared with radiotherapy while adjusting for other factors. Among those who received radiotherapy, RIT and RI granted survival benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuyan Shi
- Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, People's Republic of China
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Yujia Kong
- Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, People's Republic of China
| | - Liping Yang
- Center for Health and Medicine, Xijing Hospital, an Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shannxi 710032, People's Republic of China
| | - Juan Li
- Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, People's Republic of China
| | - Gaopei Zhu
- Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing Guo
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Qingfeng Zheng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Bo Zhang
- Department of Neurology and ICCTR Biostatistics and Research Design Center, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Suzhen Wang
- Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vinorelbine Augments Radiotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12040872. [PMID: 32260169 PMCID: PMC7226273 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12040872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a need to improve the effectiveness of radiotherapy (RT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy and toxicity of the anti-microtubule agent Vinorelbine as a radiosensitizer in HCC. The radio sensitivity of 16 HCC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models was determined by quantifying the survival fraction following irradiation in vitro, and Vinorelbine radio sensitization was determined by clonogenic assay. Ectopic HCC xenografts were treated with a single dose of 8 Gy irradiation and twice-weekly 3 mg/kg Vinorelbine. Tumor growth and changes in the proteins involved in DNA repair, angiogenesis, tumor cell proliferation, and survival were assessed, and the 3/16 (18.75%), 7/16 (43.75%), and 6/16 (37.5%) HCC lines were classified as sensitive, moderately sensitive, and resistant, respectively. The combination of RT and Vinorelbine significantly inhibited tumor growth, DNA repair proteins, angiogenesis, and cell proliferation, and promoted more apoptosis compared with RT or Vinorelbine treatment alone. Vinorelbine improved HCC tumor response to standard irradiation with no increase in toxicity. HCC is prevalent in less developed parts of the world and is mostly unresectable on presentation. Vinorelbine and conventional radiotherapy are cost-effective, well-established modalities of cancer treatment that are readily available. Therefore, this strategy can potentially address an unmet clinical need, warranting further investigation in early-phase clinical trials.
Collapse
|
10
|
Efficacy and Safety of Liver-Directed Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Sequential Sorafenib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:106-115. [PMID: 32084526 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although sorafenib as a standard of care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prolongs overall survival (OS), its efficacy is limited owing to its unsatisfactory objective response and marginal survival benefit. To counter these limitations, we designed a single-arm, phase II trial with liver-directed concurrent chemoradiotherapy (LD-CCRT) and sequential sorafenib treatment in patients with advanced HCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS We enrolled advanced HCC patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2017 who were ineligible for curative treatment. During the first and last 5 days of 5-week radiation therapy, concurrent hepatic arterial infusion with 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/d) and leucovorin (50 mg/d) through an implanted port was administered 4 weeks after initiation of LD-CCRT and sequential sorafenib treatment (400 mg, twice daily). The primary endpoint was OS. This trial has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov. RESULTS Among the enrolled patients (n = 47), objective response rates 4 weeks after LD-CCRT and during/up to sorafenib maintenance were 44.7% and 53.2%, respectively. Overall, 9 patients (19.1%) underwent curative resection or transplantation after down staging. The median radiation dose was 60 Gy. The median OS was 24.6 months for the entire cohort and 13.0 months for the subgroup with tumor invasion into the main portal trunk or its first branch, whereas the median progression-free survival for the cohort and subgroup was 6.8 and 5.6 months, respectively. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (36.2%) and hand-foot skin reaction (34%), which were manageable with conservative treatment. CONCLUSIONS LD-CCRT and sequential sorafenib treatment provided favorable OS and progression-free survival with good tolerability. Tumor reduction using an initial LD-CCRT enabled down staging, subsequent curative treatment, and long-term survival in about 20% of the patients with advanced HCC. However, further randomized trials are required to confirm these results.
Collapse
|
11
|
Chen CP. Role of Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2019; 7:183-190. [PMID: 31293919 PMCID: PMC6609847 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2018.00060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2018] [Revised: 04/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of radiotherapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has evolved over the past few decades with the advancement of technology and improved imaging. Radiotherapy can offer high local control rates in unresectable HCC, including cases with major vascular involvement, and can provide a modality to help bridge patients to potentially curative resection or transplantation. In metastatic cases, radiotherapy can provide good palliation. This review focuses on the common radiotherapy treatment modalities used for HCC, provides outcome comparisons of these radiotherapy techniques to outcomes with other treatment modalities for HCC, and highlights the discrepancy of the role of radiotherapy in HCC amongst the current available treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chien Pong Chen
- Correspondence to: Chien Pong Chen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Scripps MD Anderson Cancer Center, 10670 John Jay Hopkins Drive, San Diego, CA 92121, USA. Tel: +1-858-554-4100, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sayan M, Yegya-Raman N, Greco SH, Gui B, Zhang A, Chundury A, Grandhi MS, Hochster HS, Kennedy TJ, Langan RC, Malhotra U, Rustgi VK, Shah MM, Spencer KR, Carpizo DR, Nosher JL, Jabbour SK. Rethinking the Role of Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Data Driven Treatment Algorithm for Optimizing Outcomes. Front Oncol 2019; 9:345. [PMID: 31275846 PMCID: PMC6591511 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide, with a majority of HCC patients not suitable for curative therapies. Approximately 70% of initially diagnosed patients cannot undergo surgical resection or transplantation due to locally advanced disease, poor liver function/underlying cirrhosis, or additional comorbidities. Local therapeutic options for patients with unresectable HCC, who are not suitable for thermal ablation, include transarterial embolization (bland, chemoembolization, radioembolization) and/or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Regarding EBRT specifically, technological advancements provide a means for safe and effective radiotherapy delivery in a wide spectrum of HCC patients. In multiple prospective studies, EBRT delivery in a variety of different fractionation schemes or in combination with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) demonstrate improved outcomes, particularly with combination therapy. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification provides a framework for treatment selection; however, given the growing complexity of treatment strategies, this classification system tends to simplify decision-making. In this review, we discuss the current literature regarding unresectable HCC and propose a modified treatment algorithm that emphasizes the role of radiation therapy for Child-Pugh score A or B patients with ≤3 nodules measuring >3 cm, multinodular disease or portal venous thrombosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mutlay Sayan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Stephanie H. Greco
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Bin Gui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Andrew Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Anupama Chundury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Miral S. Grandhi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Howard S. Hochster
- Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Timothy J. Kennedy
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Russell C. Langan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Usha Malhotra
- Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Vinod K. Rustgi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Mihir M. Shah
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Kristen R. Spencer
- Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Darren R. Carpizo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - John L. Nosher
- Department of Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Salma K. Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen Y, Grassberger C, Li J, Hong TS, Paganetti H. Impact of potentially variable RBE in liver proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:195001. [PMID: 30183674 PMCID: PMC6207451 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aadf24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Currently, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is assumed to be constant with a value of 1.1 in proton therapy. Although trends of RBE variations are well known, absolute values in patients are associated with considerable uncertainties. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a variable proton RBE in proton therapy liver trials using different fractionation schemes. Sixteen liver cancer cases were evaluated assuming two clinical schedules of 40 Gy/5 fractions and 58.05 Gy/15 fractions. The linear energy transfer (LET) and physical dose distribution in patients were simulated using Monte Carlo. The variable RBE distribution was calculated using a phenomenological model, considering the influence of the LET, fraction size and α/β value. Further, models to predict normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and tumor control probability (TCP) were used to investigate potential RBE effects on outcome predictions. Applying the variable RBE model to the 5 and 15 fractions schedules results in an increase in mean fraction-size equivalent dose (FED) to the normal liver of 5.0% and 9.6% respectively. For patients with a mean FED to the normal liver larger than 29.8 Gy, this results in a non-negligible increase in the predicted NTCP of the normal liver averaging 11.6%, ranging from 2.7% to 25.6%. On the other hand, decrease in TCP was less than 5% for both fractionation regimens for all patients when assuming a variable RBE instead of constant. Consequently, the difference in TCP between the two fractionation schedules did not change significantly assuming a variable RBE while the impact on the NTCP difference was highly case specific. In addition, both the NTCP and TCP decrease with increasing α/β value for both fractionation schemes, with the decreases being more pronounced when using a variable RBE compared to using RBE = 1.1. Assuming a constant RBE of 1.1 most likely overestimates the therapeutic ratio in proton therapy for liver cancer, predominantly due to underestimation of the RBE-weighted dose to the normal liver. The impact of applying a variable RBE (as compared to RBE = 1.1) on the NTCP difference of the two fractionation regimens is case dependent. A variable RBE results in a slight increase in TCP difference. Variations in patient radiosensitivity increase when using a variable RBE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yizheng Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America. Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, People's Republic of China. Key Laboratory of Particle & Radiation Imaging, Tsinghua University, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100084, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bae SH, Jang WI, Park HC. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: dosimetric and clinical results. Oncotarget 2017; 8:59965-59976. [PMID: 28938697 PMCID: PMC5601793 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 06/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the introduction of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), new radiotherapy techniques have expanded the indication of radiotherapy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), from the hitherto palliative to a now curative-intent purpose. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), currently the most advanced radiotherapy technique, is considered an attractive option for the treatment of HCC, and is more widely applied because it can deliver a higher dose to the tumor than 3DCRT while sparing surrounding normal organs. However, the advantages and potential disadvantages of IMRT for treating HCC have not been fully established. This article deals with three different IMRT techniques, including static IMRT and volumetric modulated arc therapy using conventional multileaf collimator (MLC) mounted linear accelerators, and helical IMRT using binary MLC mounted helical tomotherapy machine. We review dosimetric and clinical studies for these IMRT techniques for the treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Hyun Bae
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Won Il Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Medical Device Management and Research, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Li J, Zhang K, Gao Y, Xi H, Cui J, Liang W, Cai A, Wei B, Chen L. Evaluation of hepatectomy and palliative local treatments for gastric cancer patients with liver metastases: a propensity score matching analysis. Oncotarget 2017; 8:61861-61875. [PMID: 28977910 PMCID: PMC5617470 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal treatments for gastric cancer with liver metastases (GCLM) remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of hepatectomy, RFA and TACE as local treatments for GCLM. Methods From 2001 to 2015, 119 consecutive patients who received multidisciplinary treatments based on curative gastrectomy and local treatments (hepatectomy, RFA and TACE) for liver metastases were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into Group A (46, hepatectomy) and Group B (73, either or both RFA and TACE). Propensity score matching analysis was employed. Results The propensity model revealed that hepatectomy was associated with significantly longer OS compared with either or both RFA and TACE (P=0.021). The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 80.5%, 41.5% and 24.4%, respectively in Group A; and 85.4%, 21.9% and 12.2%, respectively in Group B. Subgroup analyses indicated that hepatectomy was associated with significantly longer long-term survival compared with TACE (P=0.033) and RFA (P=0.010). TACE had a similar efficacy as RFA (P=0.518), but with significantly lower costs (P=0.014) in for patients with metachronous GCLM. Conclusion Hepatectomy is the optimal local treatment for GCLM when surgical R0 resection is intended. TACE attained a similar prognosis as RFA with relatively high cost-effectiveness, particularly for patients with metachronous GCLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyang Li
- Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Kecheng Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Yunhe Gao
- Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Hongqing Xi
- Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Jianxin Cui
- Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Wenquan Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Aizhen Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Bo Wei
- Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Lin Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Park SH, Kim JC, Kang MK. Technical advances in external radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:7311-21. [PMID: 27621577 PMCID: PMC4997637 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i32.7311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2016] [Revised: 06/21/2016] [Accepted: 07/21/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy techniques have substantially improved in the last two decades. After the introduction of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, radiotherapy has been increasingly used for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Currently, more advanced techniques, including intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR), and charged particle therapy, are used for the treatment of HCC. IMRT can escalate the tumor dose while sparing the normal tissue even though the tumor is large or located near critical organs. SABR can deliver a very high radiation dose to small HCCs in a few fractions, leading to high local control rates of 84%-100%. Various advanced imaging modalities are used for radiotherapy planning and delivery to improve the precision of radiotherapy. These advanced techniques enable the delivery of high dose radiotherapy for early to advanced HCCs without increasing the radiation-induced toxicities. However, as there have been no effective tools for the prediction of the response to radiotherapy or recurrences within or outside the radiation field, future studies should focus on selecting the patients who will benefit from radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
17
|
Ohri N, Dawson LA, Krishnan S, Seong J, Cheng JC, Sarin SK, Kinkhabwala M, Ahmed MM, Vikram B, Coleman CN, Guha C. Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: New Indications and Directions for Future Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 108:djw133. [PMID: 27377923 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djw133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2015] [Accepted: 04/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide; its incidence is increasing in the United States. Depending on disease extent and underlying liver status, patients may be treated with local, locoregional, and/or systemic therapy. Recent data indicates that radiotherapy (RT) can play a meaningful role in the management of HCC. Here, we review published experiences using RT for HCC, including the use of radiosensitizers and stereotactic RT. We discuss methods for performing preclinical studies of RT for HCC and biomarkers of response. As a part of the HCC Working Group, an informal committee of the National Cancer Institute's Radiation Research Program, we suggest how RT should be implemented in the management of HCC and identify future directions for the study of RT in HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitin Ohri
- Department of Radiation Oncology (NO, CG) and Montefiore-Einstein Center for Transplantation (MK), Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (LAD); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (SK); Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, North Korea (JS); Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (JCC); Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India (SKS); Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch (MMA) and Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch (BV), Radiation Research Program (CNC), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Department of Radiation Oncology (NO, CG) and Montefiore-Einstein Center for Transplantation (MK), Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (LAD); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (SK); Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, North Korea (JS); Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (JCC); Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India (SKS); Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch (MMA) and Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch (BV), Radiation Research Program (CNC), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology (NO, CG) and Montefiore-Einstein Center for Transplantation (MK), Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (LAD); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (SK); Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, North Korea (JS); Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (JCC); Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India (SKS); Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch (MMA) and Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch (BV), Radiation Research Program (CNC), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology (NO, CG) and Montefiore-Einstein Center for Transplantation (MK), Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (LAD); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (SK); Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, North Korea (JS); Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (JCC); Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India (SKS); Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch (MMA) and Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch (BV), Radiation Research Program (CNC), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jason C Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology (NO, CG) and Montefiore-Einstein Center for Transplantation (MK), Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (LAD); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (SK); Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, North Korea (JS); Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (JCC); Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India (SKS); Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch (MMA) and Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch (BV), Radiation Research Program (CNC), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Shiv K Sarin
- Department of Radiation Oncology (NO, CG) and Montefiore-Einstein Center for Transplantation (MK), Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (LAD); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (SK); Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, North Korea (JS); Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (JCC); Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India (SKS); Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch (MMA) and Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch (BV), Radiation Research Program (CNC), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Milan Kinkhabwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology (NO, CG) and Montefiore-Einstein Center for Transplantation (MK), Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (LAD); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (SK); Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, North Korea (JS); Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (JCC); Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India (SKS); Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch (MMA) and Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch (BV), Radiation Research Program (CNC), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Mansoor M Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology (NO, CG) and Montefiore-Einstein Center for Transplantation (MK), Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (LAD); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (SK); Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, North Korea (JS); Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (JCC); Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India (SKS); Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch (MMA) and Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch (BV), Radiation Research Program (CNC), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Bhadrasain Vikram
- Department of Radiation Oncology (NO, CG) and Montefiore-Einstein Center for Transplantation (MK), Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (LAD); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (SK); Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, North Korea (JS); Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (JCC); Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India (SKS); Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch (MMA) and Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch (BV), Radiation Research Program (CNC), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - C Norman Coleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology (NO, CG) and Montefiore-Einstein Center for Transplantation (MK), Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (LAD); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (SK); Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, North Korea (JS); Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (JCC); Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India (SKS); Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch (MMA) and Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch (BV), Radiation Research Program (CNC), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Chandan Guha
- Department of Radiation Oncology (NO, CG) and Montefiore-Einstein Center for Transplantation (MK), Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (LAD); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (SK); Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, North Korea (JS); Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (JCC); Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India (SKS); Molecular Radiation Therapeutics Branch (MMA) and Clinical Radiation Oncology Branch (BV), Radiation Research Program (CNC), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhang T, Zhao YT, Wang Z, Li CR, Jin J, Jia AY, Wang SL, Song YW, Liu YP, Ren H, Fang H, Bao H, Liu XF, Yu ZH, Li YX, Wang WH. Efficacy and Safety of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Following Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e3789. [PMID: 27227954 PMCID: PMC4902378 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000003789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been beneficial in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There have been few clinical reports on the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in combination with TACE for these patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of IMRT following TACE in unresectable HCC.The medical records of consecutive patients with unresectable HCC, who underwent IMRT following TACE from January 2009 to June 2014, were retrospectively reviewed in order to assess the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and treatment-associated toxicity.A total of 64 lesions in 54 patients were included in the analysis. IMRT was delivered at a median dose of 50 Gy (range 44-70 Gy) at 1.8 to 2.0 Gy per fraction. The overall response rate was achieved in 64.8% of patients with complete response in 20.4% of patients at 3 months after completion of IMRT. The median OS was 20.2 months (95% CI = 8.6-31.9), and the actuarial 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 84.6%, 49.7%, and 36.7%, respectively. The median PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI = 7.3-13.7) and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 44.2%, 23.4%, and 14.6%, respectively. The responders had a significantly higher OS rate than the nonresponders (3-year OS 48.0% vs 14.4%, P = 0.001). During and the first month following IMRT, 10 (18.5%) patients developed grade 3 hematological toxicity, and 3 (5.6%) developed grade 3 hepatic toxicity. No patient experienced grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Radiation-induced liver disease was not observed.Our findings suggest that IMRT following TACE could be a favorable treatment option for both its safety profile and clinical benefit in patients with unresectable HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Zhang
- From the Departments of Radiation Oncology (TZ, Y-TZ, ZW, JJ, S-LW, Y-WS, Y-PL, HR, HF, X-FL, Z-HY, Y-XL, W-HW), Interventional Radiology (C-RL), Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China; Department of Medicine (AYJ), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, NY; and Department of Oncology (HB), Yan'an University Affiliated Hospital, Yan'an Shaanxi Province, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dawson LA, Hashem S, Bujold A. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2016:261-4. [PMID: 24451745 DOI: 10.14694/edbook_am.2012.32.171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), in which highly conformal potent radiation doses are delivered in fewer fractions than traditional radiation therapy (RT), is an increasingly popular treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The great majority of HCCs smaller than 6 cm and with Child-Pugh A liver function are controlled with SBRT with limited toxicity. Long-term local control is reduced in larger tumors, and toxicity is increased in patients with Child-Pugh B or C liver function. SBRT is an effective treatment for tumor vascular thrombi and can lead to sustained vascular recanalization. The first site of recurrence following SBRT is most often within the liver, away from the high dose volume, providing rationale for combining SBRT with regional or systemic therapies. Randomized trials of SBRT are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Dawson
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and the Département de Radio-oncologie Clinique-Enseignement-Recherche, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sameh Hashem
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and the Département de Radio-oncologie Clinique-Enseignement-Recherche, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alexis Bujold
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and the Département de Radio-oncologie Clinique-Enseignement-Recherche, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kirichenko A, Gayou O, Parda D, Kudithipudi V, Tom K, Khan A, Abrams P, Szramowski M, Oliva J, Monga D, Raj M, Thai N. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with or without surgery for primary and metastatic liver tumors. HPB (Oxford) 2016; 18:88-97. [PMID: 26776856 PMCID: PMC4750234 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2015] [Revised: 07/14/2015] [Accepted: 07/28/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We report single center experience on the outcome and toxicity of SBRT alone or in combination with surgery for inoperable primary and metastatic liver tumors between 2007 and 2014. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with 1-4 hepatic lesions and tumor diameter ≤9 cm received SBRT at 46.8Gy ± 3.7 in 4-6 fractions. The primary end point was local control with at least 6 months of radiographic followup, and secondary end points were toxicity and survival. RESULTS Eighty-seven assessable patients (114 lesions) completed liver SBRT for hepatoma (39) or isolated metastases (48) with a median followup of 20.3 months (range 1.9-64.1). Fourteen patients underwent liver transplant with SBRT as a bridging treatment or for tumor downsizing. Eight patients completed hepatic resections in combination with planned SBRT for unresectable tumors. Two-year local control was 96% for hepatoma and 93.8% for metastases; it was 100% for lesions ≤4 cm. Two-year overall survival was 82.3% (hepatoma) and 64.3% (metastases). No incidence of grade >2 treatment toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION In this retrospective analysis we demonstrate that liver SBRT alone or in combination with surgery is safe and effective for the treatment of isolated inoperable hepatic malignancies and provides excellent local control rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Kirichenko
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,Correspondence Alexander V. Kirichenko, Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, 320 East North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15212-4772, USA. Tel: +1 412 359 3408. Fax: +1 412 359 3171.
| | - Olivier Gayou
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David Parda
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Vijay Kudithipudi
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kusum Tom
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Akhtar Khan
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Peter Abrams
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Molly Szramowski
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jose Oliva
- Division of Gastroenterology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Dulabh Monga
- Division of Medical Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Moses Raj
- Division of Medical Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ngoc Thai
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Huang CM, Huang MY, Tang JY, Chen SC, Wang LY, Lin ZY, Huang CJ. Feasibility and efficacy of helical tomotherapy in cirrhotic patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 2015; 13:201. [PMID: 26072055 PMCID: PMC4476234 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-015-0611-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2014] [Accepted: 05/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study is to evaluate the toxicity and outcomes of helical tomotherapy (HT) in patients treated for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods From March 2008 to September 2010, 38 patients with unresectable HCC were treated with HT. The median patient age was 67 years (range, 45–85). The median follow-up period was 17.2 months (range, 7–46). All patients had liver cirrhosis. Median radiation dose was 54 Gy (range, 46–71.8) delivered in 1.8 to 2.4-Gy fractions. The planning target volumes were 241.2 ± 153.1 cm3 (range, 45.8–722.4). Treatment responses were assessed in 3–6 months after HT. Results There was a complete response in 2 patients (5.2 %), partial response in 18 patients (47.4 %), stable disease in 13 patients (34.2 %), and progressive disease in 5 patients (13.2 %). The median overall survival was 12.6 months, and 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 56.2 and 31.7 %, respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG score, p = 0.008), Child-Pugh classification (p = 0.012), albumin (p = 0.046), and hemoglobin (p = 0.028) were significant parameters that predicted primary tumor response to radiotherapy in multivariate analysis. ECOG score (p = 0.012), Child-Pugh class (p = 0.026), and response to radiotherapy (p = 0.016) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival in multivariate analysis. Responders had better overall survival than non-responders (23.6 vs. 5.8 months, p < 0.001). The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates for responders were 68.3 and 57 %, respectively, while for non-responders, they were 0 %. The 1- and 2-year local control rates were 88.2 and 82.3 %, respectively. Five patients (13.2 %) had grade 3 or greater liver toxicity, and one patient (2.6 %) had a grade 3 gastric ulcer. No treatment-related liver failure or death was documented in this study. Conclusions Radiotherapy using HT seems to be a safe and effective treatment option for unresectable HCC patients. This study indicates that HT is a feasible treatment even in patients without good performance status and hepatic function reservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Ming Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, 100 Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Cancer Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| | - Ming-Yii Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, 100 Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Cancer Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| | - Jen-Yang Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, 100 Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| | - Shinn-Cherng Chen
- Division of Hepatobiliary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| | - Liang-Yen Wang
- Division of Hepatobiliary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| | - Zu-Yau Lin
- Division of Hepatobiliary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| | - Chih-Jen Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, 100 Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Cancer Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Knox JJ, Cleary SP, Dawson LA. Localized and Systemic Approaches to Treating Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:1835-44. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.60.1153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer J. Knox
- All authors: University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sean P. Cleary
- All authors: University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laura A. Dawson
- All authors: University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
2014 KLCSG-NCC Korea Practice Guideline for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gut Liver 2015; 9:267-317. [PMID: 25918260 PMCID: PMC4413964 DOI: 10.5009/gnl14460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2014] [Accepted: 03/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The guideline for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was first developed in 2003 and revised in 2009 by the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group and the National Cancer Center, Korea. Since then, many studies on HCC have been carried out in Korea and other countries. In particular, a substantial body of knowledge has been accumulated on diagnosis, staging, and treatment specific to Asian characteristics, especially Koreans, prompting the proposal of new strategies. Accordingly, the new guideline presented herein was developed on the basis of recent evidence and expert opinions. The primary targets of this guideline are patients with suspicious or newly diagnosed HCC. This guideline provides recommendations for the initial treatment of patients with newly diagnosed HCC.
Collapse
|
24
|
2014 Korean Liver Cancer Study Group-National Cancer Center Korea practice guideline for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Radiol 2015; 16:465-522. [PMID: 25995680 PMCID: PMC4435981 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.3.465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2015] [Accepted: 04/02/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The guideline for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was first developed in 2003 and revised in 2009 by the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group and the National Cancer Center, Korea. Since then, many studies on HCC have been carried out in Korea and other countries. In particular, a substantial body of knowledge has been accumulated on diagnosis, staging, and treatment specific to Asian characteristics, especially Koreans, prompting the proposal of new strategies. Accordingly, the new guideline presented herein was developed on the basis of recent evidence and expert opinions. The primary targets of this guideline are patients with suspicious or newly diagnosed HCC. This guideline provides recommendations for the initial treatment of patients with newly diagnosed HCC.
Collapse
|
25
|
Chronomodulated capecitabine and adjuvant radiation in intermediate-risk to high-risk rectal cancer: a phase II study. Am J Clin Oncol 2015; 37:545-9. [PMID: 23428953 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0b013e31827ecd1d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of capecitabine administration according to a specific time schedule, combined with adjuvant radiation therapy, in intermediate-risk to high-risk rectal cancer patients treated with an upfront surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of grade 3 to 4 diarrhea during chemoradiation (CRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Stage II and III rectal cancer patients received, after total mesorectal excision, 2 cycles of XELOX regimen (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1; capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) bid on day 1 to 14, q21), followed by capecitabine (800 mg/m(2) bid daily; 20% dose at 12:00 AM and 80% dose at 12:00 PM) administered continuously during pelvic radiation (total 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, 1.8 Gy daily dose between 2:00 and 4:00 PM). Four additional cycles of XELOX were administered after chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS Fifty-one radically resected rectal cancer patients were enrolled. All, but one, cases were evaluated for safety of CRT. We reported a grade 3 and 4 diarrhea rate of 14% (7 of 50 patients), whereas no grade 3 and 4 leukopenia was observed. Grade 1 and 2 proctitis was observed in 26 (52%) cases, whereas grade 1 and 2 cystitis in 5 (10%) patients. Only 2 cases of grade 3 proctitis and cystitis were reported, respectively. The CRT phase was feasible and was completed by 43 (84%) patients. Three patients developed actinic enteritis 60 days after the end of the radiotherapy program. CONCLUSIONS Capecitabine timetable administration combined with adjuvant radiation therapy of rectal cancer is well tolerated and feasible. Further investigation of this chronomodulated schedule in terms of efficacy is warranted in neoadjuvant setting.
Collapse
|
26
|
The Role of Radiotherapy and Chemoradiation in the Management of Primary Liver Tumours. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2014; 26:569-80. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2014] [Revised: 02/18/2014] [Accepted: 05/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
27
|
Radiotherapy scheduling using prime numbers. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2014. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396913000411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe optimal delivery of radiation therapy to achieve maximum tumour cell kill while limiting damage to normal tissues underlies any radiation therapy treatment protocol. The biological effectiveness of radiation therapy is closely related to cellular reproductive activity. The scheduling of dose fraction to a time where actively dividing cells are at their most radiosensitive stage (RS) has potential to enhance therapeutic efficacy.Materials and methodsA prime number is a natural number >1 whose only divisors are 1 and the number itself.PurposeWe propose that the use of prime numbers in the scheduling of radiotherapy treatments could maximise biological effectiveness by facilitating the irradiation of the greatest number of cells at their most RS stage, and ultimately improve the therapeutic ratio of radiation therapy.ConclusionsThe theoretical clinical implementation of this concept into the scheduling of radiation therapy is discussed.
Collapse
|
28
|
Yang ZX, Shen JT, Li YP, Zhao K, Shi CH, Xiao Y, Yu JJ, Guo WD, Li CC, Wang YQ, Li XL. Helical tomotherapy for cancer treatment: a rapid health technology assessment. J Evid Based Med 2014; 7:192-218. [PMID: 25156336 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2013] [Accepted: 06/09/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Helical tomotherapy (HT) can be applied to treat complex malignant cancer with high-precise radiotherapy, and it can reduce the damage to normal tissues and improve treatment effects. But the procurement of HT must be approved by relevant departments of administration affairs. This study, appointed by the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China and undertook by the National Health Development Research Center and the Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, was aimed to rapidly assess the effectiveness, safety, costs, and applicability of HT, so as to provide currently available best evidence for decision-makers of health policies. METHODS We electronically searched databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, and other professional websites. Two reviewer independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, assessed quality, and then performed descriptive analysis. RESULTS (i) We finally included 150 studies, encompassing 5 HTAs, 18 CCTs, and 127 observational studies. (ii) The included HTAs were published during 2006-2009, providing fairly less evidence of low quality and the results of 145 primary studies showed that: HT had been used mainly in the treatments of 14 kinds of cancer, with low total toxicity and high survival rates. Although the quality of the included studies was poor, there was much evidence about prostate cancer, head and neck cancer, nasopharynx cancer, cervical cancer, lung cancer and liver cancer, with enough sample and fairly reliable results in HT efficacy and safety. And (iii) a total of 56 clinical trials were registered in Clinicaltrials.gov, most of which were registered by the occident. Among them, 9 were completed but the results had not been published yet. CONCLUSIONS The evidence of this study showed that, HT is safe and effective in clinic. But the abovementioned conclusion needs to be verified by conducting more high-quality studies with long-term follow-up. The costs of HT in procurement, maintenance, and application are high; and the skills, training, and qualification of operators are required. We suggest that the procurement of HT should be reduced; it should be allocated rationally and effectively used after comprehensive assessment in China's cancer epidemiology characteristics, health resource allocation, disease burden, medical service level, etc.; and also high-quality studies with long-term follow-up should be financially supported on the basis of establishing projects, so as to provide local evidence and consistently guide and improve scientific decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zong Xia Yang
- Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kong M, Hong SE, Choi WS, Choi J, Kim Y. Treatment outcomes of helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut Liver 2013; 7:343-51. [PMID: 23710317 PMCID: PMC3661968 DOI: 10.5009/gnl.2013.7.3.343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2012] [Revised: 08/29/2012] [Accepted: 09/07/2012] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims This study reports treatment outcomes after helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients for whom transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was considered ineffective or unsuitable. Methods From January 2008 to December 2011, 22 unresectable HCC patients received helical IMRT. A daily dose of 1.8 to 4 Gy was delivered at five fractions per week to deliver a total dose of 30 to 60 Gy. The most-prescribed dose fractionation was a total dose of 50 to 57.5 Gy, with a daily dose of 2.3 to 2.5 Gy. Results In the entire group, the objective response rate of the primary tumor was 72.7%. In the eight patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT), the objective response rate of PVT was 50.0%. Median disease progression-free survival was 11.8 months, and the 1-year disease progression-free survival rate was 40.2%. The median overall survival was 14.4 months, and the 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 86.4% and 69.1%, respectively. PVT and Child-Pugh classifications were significant prognostic factors for overall survival in multivariate analyses. Conclusions Helical IMRT in patients with unresectable HCC resulted in high treatment response and survival rates. This study suggests helical IMRT is a practical treatment option for HCC patients in whom TACE is unsuitable or ineffective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moonkyoo Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kim JY, Yoo EJ, Jang JW, Kwon JH, Kim KJ, Kay CS. Hypofractionated radiotheapy using helical tomotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis. Radiat Oncol 2013; 8:15. [PMID: 23324259 PMCID: PMC3570396 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-8-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2012] [Accepted: 01/13/2013] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We want to evaluate the efficacy of helical tomotherapy (HT) for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). Methods We treated 35 patients for unresectable HCC combined with PVTT in whom other treatment modalities were not indicated. The tumor thrombi involved the main trunk of the portal vein in 18 patients (51.4%) and the first or second order branches in 17 patients (48.6%). A median dose of 50 Gy (range: 45–60 Gy) was delivered in 10 fractions. Capecitabine was given concomitantly at a dose of 600 mg/m2 twice daily during radiotherapy. Results The responses were evaluated via computed tomography. There was a complete response (CR) in 5 patients (14.3%), partial response (PR) in 10 patients (28.6%), stable disease (SD) in 18 patients (51.4%) and progressive disease (PD) in 2 patients (5.7%). The Child-Pugh classification (A vs B) and the Japan integrated staging (JIS) score (2 vs 3) were statistically significant parameters that predicted the response of PVTT (p = 0.010 and p = 0.026, respectively). The median survival, one and two year survival rate of all patients was 12.9 months, 51.4% and 22.2%, respectively. The patients with tumor thrombi in the main portal trunk showed statistically inferior overall survival than patients with tumor thrombi in the portal vein branches (9.8 versus 16.6 months, respectively, p = 0.036). The responders’ median survival was 13.9 months, double 6.9 months as the median survival of the non-responders. No radiation induced liver disease or treatment related mortality was not appeared. Conclusions Hypofractionated radiotherapy with HT was effective not only for tumor response but also for survival in the advanced HCC patients with PVTT. And stricter patient selection by Child-Pugh classification and JIS score may maximize the potential benefits of this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Yoon Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
The main methods of treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Japan are hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Meticulous follow up is then undertaken to check for recurrence, which is treated using repeated RFA or TACE. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy has been introduced as treatment for advanced HCC, and the molecular-targeted drug sorafenib is also now available. Rigorous medical care using these treatment methods and early diagnosis mean that the prognosis for HCC in Japan is the best in the world. This paper reviews the treatment strategies for HCC in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Klein J, Dawson LA. Hepatocellular carcinoma radiation therapy: review of evidence and future opportunities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 87:22-32. [PMID: 23219567 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.08.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2012] [Revised: 08/29/2012] [Accepted: 08/29/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of global cancer death. Curative therapy is not an option for most patients, often because of underlying liver disease. Experience in radiation therapy (RT) for HCC is rapidly increasing. Conformal RT can deliver tumoricidal doses to focal HCC with low rates of toxicity and sustained local control in HCC unsuitable for other locoregional treatments. Stereotactic body RT and particle therapy have been used with long-term control in early HCC or as a bridge to liver transplant. RT has also been effective in treating HCC with portal venous thrombosis. Patients with impaired liver function and extensive disease are at increased risk of toxicity and recurrence. More research on how to combine RT with other standard and novel therapies is warranted. Randomized trials are also needed before RT will be generally accepted as a treatment option for HCC. This review discusses the current state of the literature and opportunities for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Klein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kim SH, Kang MK, Yea JW, Kim SK, Choi JH, Oh SA. The impact of beam angle configuration of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiat Oncol J 2012; 30:146-51. [PMID: 23170294 PMCID: PMC3496849 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2012.30.3.146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2012] [Revised: 05/26/2012] [Accepted: 06/13/2012] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This treatment planning study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of beam angle configuration of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) on the dose of the normal liver in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods The computed tomography datasets of 25 patients treated with IMRT for HCC were selected. Two IMRT plans using five beams were made in each patient; beams with equidistance of 72° (Plan I), and beams with a 30° angle of separation entering the body near the tumor (Plan II). Both plans were generated using the same constraints in each patient. Conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), gamma index, mean dose of the normal liver (Dmean_NL), Dmean_NL difference between the two plans, and percentage normal liver volumes receiving at least 10, 20, and 30 Gy (V10, V20, and V30) were evaluated and compared. Results Dmean_NL, V10, and V20 were significantly better for Plan II. The Dmean_NL was significantly lower for peripheral (p = 0.001) and central tumors (p = 0.034). Dmean_NL differences between the two plans increased in proportion to gross tumor volume to normal liver volume ratios (p = 0.002). CI, HI, and gamma indices were not significantly different for the two plans. Conclusion The IMRT plan based on beams with narrow separations reduced the irradiated dose of the normal liver, which would allow radiation dose escalation for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Hoon Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zhang J, Xie Y, Xu Y, Shao C. Suppression of endogenous hydrogen sulfide contributes to the radiation-induced bystander effects on hypoxic HepG2 cells. Radiat Res 2012; 178:395-402. [PMID: 23020085 DOI: 10.1667/rr2967.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Radiation-induced bystander effects may have important implications in radiotherapy, but it is still not well known if radiation-induced bystander effects can be triggered in hypoxic tumor cells and what are the related bystander signals. Using human hepatoma cells of HepG2, the present study found that micronuclei (MN) could be induced in the nonirradiated cells after treatment with conditioned medium (CM) harvested from irradiated cells under hypoxic conditions. Bystander effects were diminished when the irradiated cells were pretreated with sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS, an exogenous H(2)S donor) (≤100 μM). However, the bystander effects were increased when the irradiated cells were pretreated with an inhibitor of cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) and cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE), the synthases of endogenous hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S). Western blotting showed that the expressions of CSE and CBS were increased in the irradiated hypoxic cells, but were reduced in the CM treated bystander cells. The ratio of Bcl-2/Bax, a molecular marker of apoptosis, decreased with CM treatment time. However, the activity of caspase-3 increased in the hypoxic bystander cells, and this could be regulated by both NaHS and the inhibitor of endogenous H(2)S. These results demonstrate that under hypoxic conditions irradiated hepatoma cells induce bystander responses by depressing the generation of endogenous H(2)S and altering Bcl-2/Bax ratios as well as caspase-3 dependent damage in the bystander cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianghong Zhang
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Park JM, Kim K, Chie EK, Choi CH, Ye SJ, Ha SW. RapidArc vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative planning study. Br J Radiol 2012; 85:e323-9. [PMID: 22745211 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/19088580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to compare the dose-volumetric results of RapidArc (RA Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) with those of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS 20 patients previously treated for hepatocellular carcinoma were the subjects of this planning study. 10 patients were treated for portal vein tumour thrombosis (Group A), and 10 patients for primary liver tumour (Group B). Prescription dose to the planning target volume was 54 Gy in 30 fractions, and the planning goal was to deliver more than 95% of prescribed dose to at least 95% of planning target volume. RESULTS In Group A, mean doses to liver were increased with RA vs IMRT (22.9 Gy vs 22.2 Gy, p=0.0275). However, V(30 Gy) of liver was lower in RA vs IMRT (31.1% vs 32.1%, p=0.0283). In Group B, in contrast, neither mean doses nor V(30 Gy) of liver significantly differed between the two plans. V(35 Gy) of duodenum and V(20 Gy) of kidney were decreased with RA in Groups A and B, respectively (p=0.0058 and 0.0124, respectively). Both maximal doses to spinal cord and monitor unit were significantly lower in the RA plan, regardless of the group. CONCLUSION The dose-volumetric results of RA vs IMRT were different according to the different target location within the liver. In general, RA tended to be more effective in the sparing of non-liver organs at risk such as duodenum, kidney, and/or spinal cord. Moreover, RA was more efficient in the treatment delivery than IMRT in terms of total monitor unit used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lee IJ, Seong J. The optimal selection of radiotherapy treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut Liver 2012; 6:139-48. [PMID: 22570744 PMCID: PMC3343153 DOI: 10.5009/gnl.2012.6.2.139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2011] [Accepted: 07/18/2011] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The majority of patients who present with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are already at an advanced stage, and the tumors are unresectable. Radiotherapy (RT) technology can safely provide focused high-dose irradiation to these patients. A wide spectrum of RT technologiesis currently available, including internal RT consisting of Yttrium-90 ((90)Y), Iodine-131 ((131)I) anti-ferritin antibody and Homium-199 ((199)Ho) and external RT, such as three-dimensional conformal RT, intensity-modulated RT, helical tomotherapy, stereotactic body RT, and image-guided RT. However, it may be difficult for physicians to understand all of the available options and to select the optimal RT treatment. Physicians frequently query radiation oncologists on the practical indications of RT for managing patients with HCC. According to the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group practice guidelines, RT is considered appropriate for unresectable, locally advanced HCC without extrahepatic metastasis, a Child-Pugh class A or B, and tumors that occupy less than two-thirds of the liver with level II evidence. In this review, we discuss the application of various RT modalities based on disease status and the detailed indications for RT according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ik Jae Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Liver Cancer Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Liver Cancer Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mizumoto M, Okumura T, Hashimoto T, Fukuda K, Oshiro Y, Fukumitsu N, Abei M, Kawaguchi A, Hayashi Y, Ohkawa A, Hashii H, Kanemoto A, Moritake T, Tohno E, Tsuboi K, Sakae T, Sakurai H. Evaluation of liver function after proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82:e529-35. [PMID: 22284041 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2010] [Revised: 05/23/2011] [Accepted: 05/31/2011] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our previous results for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with proton beam therapy (PBT) revealed excellent local control. In this study, we focused on the impact of PBT on normal liver function. METHODS AND MATERIALS The subjects were 259 patients treated with PBT at the University of Tsukuba between January 2001 and December 2007. We evaluated the Child-Pugh score pretreatment, on the final day of PBT, and 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment with PBT. Patients who had disease progression or who died with tumor progression at each evaluation point were excluded from the analysis to rule out an effect of tumor progression. An increase in the Child-Pugh score of 1 or more was defined as an adverse event. RESULTS Of the 259 patients, 241 had no disease progression on the final day of PBT, and 91 had no progression within 12 months after PBT. In univariate analysis, the percentage volumes of normal liver receiving at least 0, 10, 20, and 30 GyE in PBT (V0, 10, 20, and 30) were significantly associated with an increase of Child-Pugh score at 12 months after PBT. Of the 91 patients evaluated at 12 months, 66 had no increase of Child-Pugh score, 15 had a 1-point increase, and 10 had an increase of ≥2 points. For the Youden index, the optimal cut-offs for V0, V10, V20, and V30 were 30%, 20%, 26%, and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that liver function after PBT is significantly related to the percentage volume of normal liver that is not irradiated. This suggests that further study of the relationship between liver function and PBT is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common malignancy worldwide, and its incidence is on the rise. The primary therapy is resection or liver transplant, but only a minority of patients present with resectable disease. Historically, radiotherapy has not played a significant role in the treatment of liver malignancies because of the low tolerance of the whole liver to radiation. With improvements in 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy, higher doses of radiation can be delivered to target lesions with low doses to the noninvolved liver; thus, experience in the use of radiation for the treatment of focal HCC has increased. At the same time, our understanding of the relationships between radiation dose and volume and the risk of classic radiation-induced liver disease and other toxicities more likely to occur in HCC patients has improved considerably. These developments have led to a body of evidence that now supports the careful use of radiotherapy for unresectable HCC. The rationale for studying radiotherapy in a randomized trial is strong.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Pan X, Wu L, Cao J, Guo W, Wang Z, Han B, Hu W. Recombinant adenovirus vector-mediated human MDA-7 gene transfection suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma growth in a mouse xenograft model. J Biomed Res 2012; 26:53-8. [PMID: 23554730 PMCID: PMC3596080 DOI: 10.1016/s1674-8301(12)60007-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2011] [Revised: 11/04/2011] [Accepted: 12/17/2011] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most common tumors in the world. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the inhibitory effects of adenoviral transduction of human melanoma differentiation-associated gene-7 (MDA-7) gene on hepatocellular carcinoma, so as to provide a theoretical basis for gene therapy of the disease. The human MDA-7 gene was cloned into replication-defective adenovirus specific to HepG2 cells using recombinant virus technology. RT-PCR and Western blotting assays were used to determine the expression of human MDA-7 mRNA and MDA-7 protein in HepG2 cells in vitro. Induction of apoptosis by overexpression of the human MDA-7 gene was determined by flow cytometry. In-vivo efficacy of adenoviral delivery of the human MDA-7 gene was assessed in nude mice bearing HepG2 cell lines in vivo by determining inhibition of tumor growth, VEGF and CD34 expression, and microvascular density (MVD). The results showed that AdGFP/MDA-7 induced apoptosis of HepG2 cells in vitro and significantly inhibited tumor growth in vivo (P < 0.05). The intratumoral MVD decreased significantly in the treated tumors (P < 0.05). We conclude the recombination adenovirus AdGFP/MDA-7 can effectively express biologically active human MDA-7, which leads to inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinting Pan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266000, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lee IJ, Seong J. Radiotherapeutic strategies in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 2011; 81 Suppl 1:123-33. [PMID: 22212946 DOI: 10.1159/000333275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Although potentially curative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are well established, they are offered only to a limited number of patients. For advanced HCC, sorafenib is now the treatment of choice. Radiotherapy technology has evolved remarkably during the past decade and can be precisely delivered, thereby permitting higher doses to the tumor and reduced doses to surrounding normal tissues. According to the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group (KLCSG) practice guidelines, radiation therapy is considered appropriate for unresectable, locally advanced HCC without extrahepatic metastasis, Child-Pugh class A or B, and tumors occupying less than two thirds of the liver with level II evidence. In this review, we discuss the radiotherapeutic strategies for each clinical setting in patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ik Jae Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Liver Cancer Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kang MK, Kim MS, Kim SK, Ye GW, Lee HJ, Kim TN, Eun JR. High-Dose Radiotherapy with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. TUMORI JOURNAL 2011; 97:724-731. [DOI: 10.1177/030089161109700608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
Aims and Background We report the results of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who were not candidate for local ablative therapies, transarterial chemoembolization or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. Methods and Study Design Between 2003 and 2008, 27 patients were treated with high-dose radiotherapy (median dose, 50.4 Gy). The equivalent sphere size of tumors was 11.4 ± 2.6 cm. Nineteen and 8 patients were Child-Pugh class A and B, respectively. Eighteen patients had thromboses in large veins. Six patients were treated with radiotherapy as the initial treatment modality, and 21 patients received other treatments before radiotherapy. Results The overall response rate was 44.4% (1 pathologic complete response and 11 partial responses). The primary failure pattern was intrahepatic disease progression. Until the last follow-up, the primary liver masses and vein thromboses did not progress in 63.6% and 60.0% of the patients, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival after radiotherapy rate were 3 and 5 months, respectively. Based on univariate analyses, response, Child-Pugh classification, and vein thrombosis were significant factors for overall survival, and tumor response, tumor size, vein thrombosis, and multiplicity were significant factors for progression-free survival. Tumor response was the only significant prognostic factor for overall survival and progression-free survival based on multivariate analyses. Conclusions Radiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy achieved a good response rate in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, and patients who had a good response lived longer than patients who did not have a good response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Kyu Kang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Myung Se Kim
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Kyu Kim
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Gi Won Ye
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Heon Ju Lee
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Nyeun Kim
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Ryul Eun
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
|
43
|
Massabeau C, Marchand V, Zefkili S, Servois V, Campana F, Giraud P. Early experience of helical tomotherapy for hepatobiliary radiotherapy. Case Reports Hepatol 2011; 2011:545267. [PMID: 25954545 PMCID: PMC4411892 DOI: 10.1155/2011/545267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2011] [Accepted: 05/14/2011] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Helical tomotherapy (HT), an image-guided, intensity-modulated, radiation therapy technique, allows for precise targeting while sparing normal tissues. We retrospectively assessed the feasibility and tolerance of the hepatobiliary HT in 9 patients. A total dose of 54 to 60 Gy was prescribed (1.8 or 2 Gy per fraction) with concurrent capecitabine for 7 patients. There were 1 hepatocarcinoma, 3 cholangiocarcinoma, 4 liver metastatic patients, and 1 pancreatic adenocarcinoma. All but one patient received previous therapies (chemotherapy, liver radiofrequency, and/or surgery). The median doses delivered to the normal liver and to the right kidney were 15.7 Gy and 4.4 Gy, respectively, below the recommended limits for all patients. Most of the treatment-related adverse events were transient and mild in severity. With a median followup of 12 months, no significant late toxicity was noted. Our results suggested that HT could be safely incorporated into the multidisciplinary treatment of hepatobiliary or pancreatic malignant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Massabeau
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, 31052 Toulouse, France
| | - Virginie Marchand
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Sofia Zefkili
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Vincent Servois
- Department of Radiology, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - François Campana
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Philippe Giraud
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, 75015 Paris, Paris Descartes University, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lee IJ, Seong J, Koom WS, Kim YB, Jeon BC, Kim JH, Han KH. Selection of the Optimal Radiotherapy Technique for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2011; 41:882-9. [DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyr053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
|
45
|
Radiothérapie externe des carcinomes hépatocellulaires. Cancer Radiother 2011; 15:49-53. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2010.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2010] [Accepted: 10/12/2010] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
46
|
Mizumoto M, Okumura T, Hashimoto T, Fukuda K, Oshiro Y, Fukumitsu N, Abei M, Kawaguchi A, Hayashi Y, Ookawa A, Hashii H, Kanemoto A, Moritake T, Tohno E, Tsuboi K, Sakae T, Sakurai H. Proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of three treatment protocols. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 81:1039-45. [PMID: 20888707 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2010] [Revised: 06/30/2010] [Accepted: 07/01/2010] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our previous results for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with proton beam therapy revealed excellent local control with low toxicity. Three protocols were used to avoid late complications such as gastrointestinal ulceration and bile duct stenosis. In this study, we examined the efficacy of these protocols. METHODS AND MATERIALS The subjects were 266 patients (273 HCCs) treated by proton beam therapy at the University of Tsukuba between January 2001 and December 2007. Three treatment protocols (A, 66 GyE in 10 fractions; B, 72.6 GyE in 22 fractions; and C, 77 GyE in 35 fractions) were used, depending on the tumor location. RESULTS Of the 266 patients, 104, 95, and 60 patients were treated with protocols A, B, and C, respectively. Seven patients with double lesions underwent two different protocols. The overall survival rates after 1, 3 and 5 years were 87%, 61%, and 48%, respectively (median survival, 4.2 years). Multivariate analysis showed that better liver function, small clinical target volume, and no prior treatment (outside the irradiated field) were associated with good survival. The local control rates after 1, 3, and 5 years were 98%, 87%, and 81%, respectively. Multivariate analysis did not identify any factors associated with good local control. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that proton beam therapy achieved good local control for HCC using each of three treatment protocols. This suggests that selection of treatment schedules based on tumor location may be used to reduce the risk of late toxicity and maintain good treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Liver-Directed Therapy for Hepatic Metastases in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2010; 252:142-8. [DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181dbb7a7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|