Effectiveness and tolerability of programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy for upper gastrointestinal tract cancers

BACKGROUND

The combination of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor and chemotherapy is approved as a standard first- or second-line treatment in patients with advanced oesophageal or gastric cancer. However, it is unclear whether this combination is superior to chemotherapy alone.

AIM

To assess the comparative effectiveness and tolerability of combining PD-1 inhibitors with chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, or oesophageal carcinoma.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for studies that compared the efficacy and tolerance of PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced oesophageal or gastric cancer. We employed either random or fixed models to analyze the outcomes of each clinical trial, encompassing data on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Nine phase 3 clinical trials (7016 advanced oesophageal and gastric cancer patients) met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the pooled PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group had a significantly longer OS than the chemotherapy-alone group [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-0.81]; the pooled PFS result was consistent with that of OS (HR = 0.67, 95%CI: 0.61-0.74). The count of patients achieving an objective response in the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group surpassed that of the chemotherapy-alone group [odds ratio (OR) = 1.86, 95%CI: 1.59-2.18]. AE incidence was also higher in the combination-therapy group than in the chemotherapy-alone group, regardless of whether ≥ grade 3 only (OR = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.07-1.57) or all AE grades (OR = 1.88, 95%CI: 1.39-2.54) were examined. We performed a subgroup analysis based on the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) and noted extended OS and PFS durations within the CPS ≥ 1, CPS ≥ 5, and CPS ≥ 10 subgroups of the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to chemotherapy alone, the combination of PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy appears to present a more favorable option for initial or subsequent treatment in patients with gastric cancer, GEJ tumor, or oesophageal cancer. This holds true particularly for individuals with PD-L1 CPS scores of ≥ 5 and ≥ 10.

Network meta-analysis of second line and beyond treatment options in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Deciding on the optimal second-line (2L) treatment for metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains challenging due to the limited information comparing each of the available options and the influence of the newly expanding first-line (1L) agents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating 2L treatments in metastatic ccRCC. This Network Meta-analysis (NMA) evaluates the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and severe adverse events (SAE). We used normal likelihood model to incorporate log hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (OR), and 95%-confidence-intervals (CI). Treatment p-scores were used for ranking. Data was analyzed in a fixed-effects model using the netmeta package in R v.1.5-0.

RESULTS

All therapies demonstrated some benefits over placebo. Lenvatinib + everolimus ranked first for OS (HR = 0.44; 95%CI = 0.24-0.82; p-score = 0.92), PFS (HR = 0.13; 95%CI = 0.07-0.24, p-score = 0.98), and ORR (OR = 35.95; 95%CI = 11.55-111.87; p-score = 0.93) compared to placebo, though with a higher SAE (OR = 5.27; p-score = 0.23). Cabozantinib ranked second for OS (HR = 0.57, p-score = 0.80), PFS (HR = 0.19; p-score = 0.86), and ORR (OR = 27.24, p-score = 0.84). Nivolumab was third for ORR (p-score = 0.79), fourth for OS (p-score = 0.69), fifth for PFS (p-score = 0.61), and last for SAE (p-score = 0.83). Lenvatinib monotherapy ranked worst SAE (OR = 5.89, p-score = 0.17) and third for OS and PFS. The latest drug, tivozanib, was sixth for PFS, OS, and ORR. The NMA matrix revealed no differential OS benefit between cabozantinib, lenvatinib + everolimus, and nivolumab. Other regimens had no significant OS benefit when compared to placebo.

CONCLUSION

Based on OS and PFS, the lenvtatinib + everolimus combination yielded superior, followed by cabozantinib and Lenvatinib monotherapies; all were limited by a worse SAE profile. Nivolumab and pazopanib had the lowest odds of SAEs.

Predictive significance of inflammatory markers and mGPS in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is a prevalent cancer in men worldwide, and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is characterized by disease progression despite androgen deprivation therapy. While clinical and prognostic biomarkers have been identified in CRPC, the significance of serum inflammatory markers remains unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 79 CRPC patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide. Inflammatory markers, including the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), were assessed as predictive tools for treatment response. Patient data were obtained from medical charts, and statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 67 years, with most having a Gleason score of 8-10. The median values for NLR, PLR, and SII were 2.9, 168.5, and 713.5, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) to abiraterone or enzalutamide therapy was 55.1%. mGPS showed a significant association with ORR, with the mGPS 0 group having the highest response rate (59.5%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.8 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 35.4 months. Palliative radiotherapy during therapy and PSA doubling time were independent prognostic factors for PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

mGPS and PSA doubling time significantly impacted survival, and mGPS significantly predicted the treatment response in mCRPC, which may lead to further prospective studies.

Neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy had a higher ORR than mono-immunotherapy in untreated HNSCC: Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

HNSCC is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide and immune checkpoint inhibitor has shown favorable therapeutic effect in R/M HNSC. However, the application of immunotherapy in untreated HNSCC still needs to be discovered since most R/M HNSCC patients have been treated before and their drug susceptibility and immune tumor microenvironment have changed. This meta-analysis tries to compare immunotherapy and immunochemotherapy in untreated HNSCC and give a reference for clinic application.

METHODS

Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, were systematically searched from inception through August 31, 2022. The primary outcomes were efficacy, evaluated by objective response rate, 1-year OS and 1-year PFS, and safety, evaluated by grade 3-4 adverse reaction rate.

RESULTS

A total of 1092 patients from twenty-four studies were included, 282 (25.8%) of which had ORR reported. The average ORR was 37% (95%CI = 26%-49%). Immunochemotherapy could have higher ORR than immunotherapy patients (ORR: 61% vs 22%), and favorable 1-year overall survival from PD-L1 inhibitor (OS = 84%, 95%CI 76%-93%). Radiotherapy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy was equal with the other treatments like chemotherapy and surgery (84% vs 88%, subgroup df p = 0.7). There was no apparent difference between immunotherapy and immunochemotherapy (32% vs 42%, subgroup df p = 0.60).

CONCLUSION

HNSCC patients could benefit more from neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

Folfirinox vs. Gemcitabine + Nab-Paclitaxel as the First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The efficacy and safety of Folfirinox (FFX) or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GnP) to be used as the first-line drugs for pancreatic cancer (PC) is yet to be established. We conducted an analysis of retrospective studies to assess the efficacy and safety of these two regimens by comparing their survival and safety outcomes in patients with PC.

Methods

We conducted an extensive review of two electronic databases from inception till February 2023 to include all the relevant studies that compared FFX with GnP published and unpublished work. Retrospective studies were only included. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled using hazard ratios (HRs), while objective response rate (ORR) and safety outcomes were pooled using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random effects model.

Results

A total of 7,030 patients were identified in a total of 21 articles that were shortlisted. Pooled results concluded that neither FFX nor GnP was associated to increase the OS time (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.83 - 1.04; P = 0.0001); however, FFX was more likely associated with increased PFS when compared to GnP (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81 - 0.97; P < 0.0001). ORR proved to be non-significant between the two regimens (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.64 - 1.27; P = 0.15). Safety outcomes included neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia and diarrhea. GnP was more associated with diarrhea (OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.22 - 3.15; P = 0.001), while FFX was seen to cause anemia (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.51 - 0.98; P = 0.10) in PC patients. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were in-significant in the two drug regimens (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.92 - 1.31; P = 0.33 and OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.60 - 1.13; P = 0.23, respectively).

Conclusion

FFX and GnP showed a significant difference in increasing the PFS, while no difference was observed while measuring OS. Safety outcomes showed that FFX and GnP shared similar safety profiles as FFX was associated with hematological outcomes, while GnP was more associated with non-hematological outcomes.

Re-immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with anti-programmed death-1 and/or anti-programmed death ligand-1 antibodies

BACKGROUND

The role of re-immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. No studies have evaluated the re-immunotherapy regimen including anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 antibody for lung cancer treatment. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of re-immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) and/or anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibodies.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who received immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (without concomitant cytotoxic chemotherapy) between November 2020 and November 2022 at the National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan. Data were extracted from patients who had previously received immunotherapies with anti-PD-1 and/or anti-PD-L1 antibodies. Treatment responses and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 67 patients who received immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 23 were included in final analysis. The objective response rate was 17%, and the disease control rate was 48% for nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy. The highest grade of immune-related adverse events was grade 3, occurring in 11% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Re-immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab after anti-PD-1 and/or anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy may be feasible and provide clinical benefit in selected patients. Further prospective studies are warranted to identify the patient population that may benefit from re-immunotherapy.

Efficacy and toxicity of anti-vascular endothelial growth receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with neuroendocrine tumours - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Although anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RTKIs) have been tested in patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) over the last two decades, no study to date has benchmarked efficacy and toxicity of these drugs in this patient population.

METHODS

All phase II and phase III studies of anti-VEGF RTKIs in patients with NETs, published between January 1, 2000 andJuly 31, 2021, across major trial databases, were searched in August 2021 for relevant studies. The primary objectives of the meta-analysis were to compare objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with pancreatic NETs (pNETs) and extra-pancreatic NETs (epNETs), and the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of adverse events between patients receiving anti-VEGF RTKIs and control.

RESULTS

1611 patients were available for the meta-analysis; 1194 received anti-VEGF RTKIs. ORR in pNETs was 18% (95% confidence interval (CI) 13-25%), while ORR in epNETs was 8% (95% CI 5-12%); test for differences between pNETs and epNETs (x12 = 8.38, p < .01). Median PFS in pNETs was 13.9 months (95% CI 11.43-16.38 months), while median PFS in epNETs was 12.71 months (95% CI 9.37-16.05 months); test for differences between pNETs and epNETs (x12 = .35, p = .55). With regards to common grade 3/4 adverse events , patients who received anti-VEGF RTKIs were more likely to experience hypertension (IRR 3.04, 95% CI 1.63-5.65) and proteinuria (IRR 5.79, 95% CI 1.09-30.74) in comparison to those who received control.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-VEGF RTKIs demonstrate anti-tumour effect in both pNETs and epNETs, supporting their development in both populations. These agents also appear to be safe in patients with NETs.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 54 studies with 6187 hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The impacts of macrovascular invasion (MVI) or extrahepatic spread (EHS) on the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) among hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients remain unclear. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify whether ICI therapy is a feasible treatment option for HCC with MVI or EHS.

METHODS

Eligible studies published before September 14, 2022, were retrieved. In this meta-analysis, the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and occurrence of adverse events (AEs) were outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies involving 6187 individuals were included. The findings indicated that the presence of EHS in ICI-treated HCC patients may indicate an inferior ORR (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.96), but may not significantly affect the PFS (multivariate analyses: HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.70-2.31) and OS (multivariate analyses: HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.70-2.16). Additionally, the presence of MVI in ICI-treated HCC patients may not have significant prognostic impact on ORR (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.64-1.10), but may indicate inferior PFS (multivariate analyses: HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.07-2.84) and OS (multivariate analyses: HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.31-3.14). The presence of EHS or MVI in ICI-treated HCC patients may not significantly impact the occurrence of any serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (grades ≥ 3) (EHS: OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.12-1.56; MVI: OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.24-1.88).

CONCLUSION

The presence of MVI or EHS in ICI-treated HCC patients may not significantly impact the occurrence of serious irAEs. However, the presence of MVI (but not EHS) in ICI-treated HCC patients may be a significant negative prognostic factor. Therefore, ICI-treated HCC patients with MVI warrant more attention.

Efficacy and Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have been increasingly employed for the treatment of various cancers in clinical practice. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Abstracts of American Society of Clinical Oncology proceedings databases were searched. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events (AEs) and drug withdrawal were pooled. Odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) were calculated to analyze the difference in the ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS between groups.

RESULTS

Among the 14,902 initially identified papers, 98 studies regarding use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced HCC were included. Based on different criteria of response in solid tumors, the pooled ORR, DCR, and median PFS was 16-36%, 54-74%, and 4.5-6.8 months, respectively. The pooled median OS was 11.9 months. Compared to multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy significantly increased ORR (OR 2.73, P < 0.00001) and OS (HR 0.97, P = 0.05), and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with TKIs significantly increased ORR (OR 3.17, P < 0.00001), DCR (OR 2.44, P < 0.00001), PFS (HR 0.58, P < 0.00001), and OS (HR 0.58, P < 0.00001). The pooled incidence of all-grade AEs, grade ≥ 3 AEs, and drug withdrawal was 71%, 25%, and 7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the present systematic review and meta-analysis, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors should be the preferred treatment choice for advanced HCC owing to their higher antitumor effect and improved outcomes.

Comparison of gefitinib plus chemotherapy versus gefitinib alone for advanced non‑small‑cell lung cancer: A meta analysis

This study aimed to perform a meta‑analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of gefitinib in combination with chemotherapy versus gefitinib alone in patients with advanced Non‑Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). We searched databases for clinical studies that reported the efficacy or safety of gefitinib plus chemotherapy in comparison with gefitinib alone. Raw data from included studies were extracted and pooled to calculate the Odds Ratio (OR) for Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR), the Hazard Ratio (HR) for Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS), and OR for complication ≥ Grade 3. A total of 10 studies containing 1,528 patients with NSCLC were identified and included in the analysis. Gefitinib plus chemotherapy showed significantly better efficacy in improving ORR (OR = 1.54; 95% CI [Confidence Interval], 1.13‒2.1; p = 0.006), DCR (OR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.14‒2.29; p = 0.007), PFS (HR=1.67; 95% CI 1.45‒1.94; p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.2‒1.87; p < 0.001) as compared with gefitinib alone. Consistent results were observed in the sub-population with positive EGFR mutation. The combination of gefitinib with chemotherapy had a significantly higher risk of complication (≥ Grade 3) with an OR of 3.29 (95% CI 2.57‒4.21; p < 0.001). The findings in the present study suggest that the combination of gefitinib with chemotherapy can provide better disease response and survival outcomes for patients with advanced NSCLC.

The efficacy and safety of thermal ablation for patients with lung malignancy: a meta-analysis of 12 studies in China

BACKGROUND

Thermal ablation has been increasingly used in the treatment of lung cancer in recent years. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the therapeutic effect and safety of thermal ablation plus chemotherapy as compared with chemotherapy alone in treating patients with lung malignancy in China based on current evidence.

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for clinical reports. Additional literature search was also performed by searching the reference list of included studies and latest reviews. Raw data including objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and the incidence of major complication were extracted and pooled.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies in China including 1282 patients with lung malignancy were included in this meta-analysis. The number of studies that reported data of objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and major complication was 8, 7, 7, 6 and 7, respectively. The combination therapy of thermal ablation plus chemotherapy showed a significantly better efficacy in improving objective response rate (odds ratio = 2.73; P < 0.001) and disease control rate (odds ratio = 2.43; P < 0.001) as compared with chemotherapy alone. Thermal ablation was also a significant protective factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.43; P < 0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.49; P < 0.001). Besides, thermal ablation did not increase the risk of major complication (odds ratio = 0.75; P = 0.252).

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis based on these studies in China suggested that thermal ablation is a promising technique to provide better disease response and survival outcomes for patients with lung malignancy. Thermal ablation is worth further promotion in treating lung malignancy and application in clinical practice.

Assessment of added activity of an antitumor agent

An unprecedented number of novel oncology drugs are under preclinical and clinical development, and nearly all are developed in combinations. With an over-reliance on biological hypotheses, there is less effort to establish single agent activity before initiating late clinical development. This may be contributing to a decreased success rate going from phase 1 to approval in the immunotherapy era. Growing evidence in clinical trial data shows that the treatment benefit from most approved combination therapies can be explained by the independent drug action model. Using this working model, we develop a simple index to measure the added antitumor activity of a new drug based on mean response duration, an endpoint that naturally combines both response status and duration information for all patients, which is shown to be highly predictive of clinical benefit of FDA-approved anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapies. This index sheds light on challenges and opportunities in contemporary oncology drug development and provides a practical tool to assist with decision-making in early clinical trials.

Combining stereotactic body radiotherapy with camrelizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-arm trial

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may have significant immunomodulatory effects that enhance tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. This phase 2 clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining palliative SBRT with camrelizumab (an anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

METHODS

Patients with uHCC, Child-Pugh A/B liver function, and at least one measurable lesion were enrolled between April 2020 and August 2022. Patients were administered 200 mg camrelizumab intravenously from the first day of palliative SBRT and then every 3 weeks. Palliative SBRT was delivered daily over five fractions per week, with a dose range of 30-50 Gy. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04193696).

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled; the median radiation dose was 40 Gy, and the median number of cycles of camrelizumab was five. The ORR was 52.4%. After a median follow-up of 19.7 months, the median progression-free and overall survival were 5.8 and 14.2 months, respectively. The overall survival probability was 85.7% at 6 months, 76.2% at 9 months, and 59.9% at 12 months. All grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in five patients (23.8%) and were manageable. No grade 4/5 TRAEs were observed.

CONCLUSION

Palliative SBRT plus camrelizumab showed promising antitumor activity against uHCC. Toxicities were manageable with no unexpected safety issues. This study provides evidence of a new therapeutic method for the treatment of uHCC.

The efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors for recurrent ovarian cancer: a meta‑analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (OC).

METHODS

Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched to find eligible studies until August 10, 2021. The data on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were pooled. Furthermore, grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies with 3953 patients were included. Compared with control group, angiogenesis inhibitors resulted in significant improvement in PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.61, 95%CI, 0.54-0.69), OS (HR = 0.88, 95%CI, 0.81-0.95), and ORR (odds ratio (OR) = 2.15, 95% CI, 1.74-2.65). However, angiogenesis inhibitors were associated with a higher risk of grade ≥ 3 AEs (relative risk (RR), 1.20, 95% CI, 1.04-1.38).

CONCLUSION

Angiogenesis inhibitors can improve ORR, PFS, and OS in patients with recurrent OC, but they can increase the incidence of AEs ≥ 3.

Real-world data analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitors in stage III-IV adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma

Background

This study was designed to investigate the clinical application, efficacy, and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of lung cancer in the real world.

Methods

A retrospective, observational analysis was conducted on patients treated with ICIs in four tertiary hospitals in the region from January 2015 to March 2021, to evaluate the clinical efficacy of ICIs single-agent or combined chemotherapy and anti-vascular drugs in the first-line or second-line treatment of patients with lung cancer.

Results

Three hundred and fifteen patients were enrolled in this study. In patients with stage III-IV adenocarcinoma and Squamous cell carcinoma, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 35.5% (87/245) and 93.5% (229/245), respectively, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.8 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. A total of 132 patients received ICIs as the first-line treatment, the median treatment cycle was 8 cycles (2–20 cycles), the short-term efficacy ORR was 38.6%, DCR was 93.9%, and the median PFS was 11.4 months. One hundred thirteen patients received ICIs treatment as second-line treatment, the median treatment cycle was five cycles (2–10 cycles), the short-term efficacy ORR was 31.9%, DCR was 92.9%, and the median PFS was 10.0 months. There were no statistically significant differences in ORR, DCR, or median PFS with ICIs as the first-line treatment compared with the second-line treatment(P > 0.05). The results of subgroup analysis showed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status, pathological type and number of treatment lines were not correlated with median PFS(P > 0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences in programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1) expression, corticosteroid interference, and antibiotic (Abx) treatment among all groups (P < 0.05). In terms of safety, the overall incidence of adverse reactions in 315 patients was 62.5%, and the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was 13.7%. Grade 1–2 and 3–4 incidence of adverse events were 34.9 and 27.65%, respectively. There were four patients who experienced fatal irAEs, two cases were liver damage leading to liver failure, one case was immune related pneumonia, and one case was immune related myocarditis.

Conclusion

In the real world, ICIs has a good effect on patients with lung cancer and significantly improves ORR and PFS.

Biweekly oxaliplatin plus S1 for Chinese elderly patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer as the first-line therapy: a single-arm, phase 2 study

Background

SOX (oxaliplatin and S1, every 3 weeks) is one of the most common first-line chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic G/GEJ (gastric or gastroesophageal junction) cancer in Asia, but it has noticeable hematological and neurological toxicity. In China, the majority of gastric cancer patients are middle-aged and elderly with poor tolerance to 3-weekly chemotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to assess efficacy and safety of biweekly SOX for Chinese advanced G/GEJ cancer patients aged ≥ 60 years as the first-line treatment in a single arm phase 2 study.

Methods

Oxaliplatin was administered intravenously on day 1 at 85 mg/m². S-1 was given at 80, 100 or 120 mg/day, depending on the body surface area (< 1.25 m², 1.25 to < 1.5 m², or ≥ 1.5 m²), twice daily, on day 1–10, every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR) and safety.

Results

Between May 2016 and Sep 2018, 42 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 43.6 months. The ORR and DCR were 52.4% and 85.7%, respectively. The median PFS was 4.6 months (95%CI 2.486–6.714), and the median OS was 11.1 months (95%CI 8.001–14.199). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade included thrombocytopenia (59.5%), neutropenia (57.1%), appetite loss (57.1%) and nausea (54.8%). Only two patients suffered from grade 3 TRAEs (4.8%), including neutropenia (1 patient, [2.4%]) and diarrhea (1 patient, [2.4%]). No ≥ grade 4 TRAEs occurred.

Conclusions

Biweekly SOX seemed to have favorable tolerance without compromising the efficacy as the first-line therapy in Chinese elderly patients aged ≥ 60 years with advanced G/GEJ cancer.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04694404 (5/1/2021). This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, (17–048/1303).

Bendamustine versus chlorambucil in treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in China: a randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled, phase III clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic lymphoblastic leukemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukemia and mainly affects the elderly. Chemoimmunotherapy still has a role in the standard frontline therapy for specific population. However, the clinical activity of bendamustine has not been investigated in unfit Chinese patients with CLL. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of bendamustine versus chlorambucil for untreated Chinese patients with Binet stage B/C CLL.

METHODS

In this multi-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled, phase III trial, patients with previously untreated CLL were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive bendamustine or chlorambucil. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, the duration of response, and overall survival. Adverse events were recorded to evaluate safety.

RESULTS

Of 158 screened patients, 147 were enrolled and randomly allocated to receive bendamustine (n = 72) or chlorambucil (n = 75). After a median follow-up of 25.6 months (IQR 12.5-27.7), 69.0% (95% CI, 56.9-79.5) of bendamustine-treated patients achieved objective response and 37.0% (95% CI, 26.0-49.1) of chlorambucil with a difference of 32.0% (95%CI: 16.6-47.5), demonstrating the superiority of bendamustine to chlorambucil (p < 0.001). The median progression-free survival was longer for bendamustine (16.5 months; 95% CI, 11.3-24.7) versus chlorambucil (9.6 months; 95% CI, 8.7-11.8; p < 0.001). A longer median duration of response was seen in those receiving bendamustine (19.2 months; 95% CI, 11.8-29.1) than chlorambucil (10.7 months; 95% CI, 5.6-13.6; p = 0.0018). Median overall survival was not reached in either group. Overall survival at 18 months was 88% for bendamustine versus 85% for chlorambucil. Most common adverse events in both groups were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

In untreated Chinese patients with Binet stage B/C CLL, bendamustine induced the better objective response and resulted in longer progression-free survival than chlorambucil. Overall, these results validate the role of bendamustine as an effective and safe first-line therapy in this population.

Associations between immune-related thyroid dysfunction and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence suggesting that the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) may be a predictor of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy. Whether this association extends to all irAEs or just those within particular organs/systems is yet to be resolved. As immune-related thyroid dysfunction (thyroid irAE) is one of the most commonly reported irAEs, this study aims to summarize the available data and determine if thyroid irAE is a surrogate marker for improved cancer outcomes during ICI therapy.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched up to July 1st 2021 for studies assessing the relationship between thyroid irAE development during ICI therapy and cancer outcomes. Outcome measures of interest include overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Sub-group analyses based on cancer type and adjustment for immortal time bias (ITB) were also performed.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies were included in the systematic review. Twenty-one studies were included in the OS meta-analysis whilst 15 were included in the PFS meta-analysis. Development of thyroid irAE during ICI therapy was associated with improved OS and PFS (OS: HR 0.52, CI 0.43-0.62, p < 0.001; PFS: HR 0.58, CI 0.50-0.67, p < 0.001). Sub-group analyses involving non-small cell lung cancer populations and studies where ITB was accounted for, observed similar results (HR 0.37, CI 0.24-0.57, p < 0.001) and (HR 0.51, CI 0.39-0.69, p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite the heterogeneity and biases identified, the evidence does suggest that the development of thyroid irAE is associated with anti-tumor effects of ICIs and therefore, can be used as a surrogate marker for clinical response.

First-in-human phase 1/1b study to evaluate sitravatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors

Sitravatinib (MGCD516), a spectrum-selective receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting TAM (TYRO3, AXL, MERTK) and split kinase family receptors, has demonstrated preclinical anti-tumor activity and modulation of tumor microenvironment. This first-in-human phase 1/1b study included sitravatinib dose exploration and anti-tumor activity evaluation in selected patients with advanced solid tumors. Primary objectives included assessment of safety, pharmacokinetics and clinical activity of sitravatinib. Secondary objectives included identifying doses for further investigation and exploring molecular markers for patient selection. In phase 1, 32 patients received 10-200 mg, while phase 1b dose expansion comprised 161 patients (150 mg n = 99, 120 mg n = 62). Maximum tolerated dose was determined as 150 mg daily. Dose-limiting toxicity was reported in 4/28 evaluable phase 1 patients (three at 200 mg, one at 80 mg). In phase 1b, 120 mg was defined as the recommended dose due to tolerability. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were experienced by 174/193 patients (90.2%); grade ≥ 3 TRAEs in 103 patients (53.4%). Most common TRAEs were diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension and nausea; TRAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 26 patients (13.5%) and death in one patient. Sitravatinib was steadily absorbed and declined from plasma with a terminal elimination half-life of 42.1-51.5 h following oral administration. Overall objective response rate was 11.8% in phase 1b, 13.2% in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 4.2% in patients with NSCLC with prior checkpoint inhibitor experience. Sitravatinib demonstrated manageable safety and modest clinical activity in solid tumors. NCT02219711 (first posted August 14, 2014).

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with advanced malignancy: a single-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

For advanced tumors that lack specific oncogenic alteration and are resistant to chemotherapy, anti-angiogenesis therapy or immunotherapy or a combination of the two are the most important treatments. Anlotinib is a newly developed oral small molecule receptor tyrosine kinases inhibitor with the potency of inhibiting tumor angiogenesis. This was an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study to validate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with various cancer types.

METHODS

Patients with advanced malignancy who have failed previous therapies or lack effective treatment choices received daily oral administration of 12 mg anlotinib on days 1-14 every 3 weeks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or physician decision. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

A total of 93 eligible patients with 26 different cancer types were enrolled. The overall ORR was 21.5%. The median PFS was 5.7 months and median OS was 12.0 months. The most common treatment-related AE of all grades and of grade 3 was both hypertriglyceridemia at an incidence of 40.9% and 5.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib exhibits objective efficacy and safety in advanced malignancy and might be a possible treatment option for many types of cancer patients who have failed prior treatment and with no optimal therapy regimen.

Identification of NOTCH4 mutation as a response biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy elicits durable antitumor responses in patients with many types of cancer. Genomic mutations may be used to predict the clinical benefits of ICI therapy. NOTCH homolog-4 (NOTCH4) is frequently mutated in several cancer types, but its role in immunotherapy is still unclear. Our study is the first to study the association between NOTCH4 mutation and the response to ICI therapy.

METHODS

We tested the predictive value of NOTCH4 mutation in the discovery cohort, which included non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, esophagogastric cancer, and bladder cancer patients, and validated it in the validation cohort, which included non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, esophagogastric cancer, glioma, bladder cancer, head and neck cancer, cancer of unknown primary, and breast cancer patients. Then, the relationships between NOTCH4 mutation and intrinsic and extrinsic immune response mechanisms were studied with multiomics data.

RESULTS

We collected an ICI-treated cohort (n = 662) and found that patients with NOTCH4 mutation had better clinical benefits in terms of objective response rate (ORR: 42.9% vs 25.9%, P = 0.007), durable clinical benefit (DCB: 54.0% vs 38.1%, P = 0.021), progression-free survival (PFS, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.558, P < 0.001), and overall survival (OS, HR = 0.568, P = 0.006). In addition, we validated the prognostic value of NOTCH4 mutation in an independent ICI-treated cohort (n = 1423). Based on multiomics data, we found that NOTCH4 mutation is significantly associated with enhanced immunogenicity, including a high tumor mutational burden, the expression of costimulatory molecules, and activation of the antigen-processing machinery, and NOTCH4 mutation positively correlates activated antitumor immunity, including infiltration of diverse immune cells and various immune marker sets.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicated that NOTCH4 mutation serves as a novel biomarker correlated with a better response to ICI therapy.

Nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a randomized study

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (nab-P/S) versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/G) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

Treatment-naïve patients with advanced PDAC were equally randomized to receive nab-P/S or nab-P/G. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were ORR of the primary lesion, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. The trial was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03636308.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients were planned for enrollment, but the trial was prematurely closed because no better ORR was observed with nab-P/S among the first 40 patients assigned between 08/2018 and 06/2019. The ORR was numerically higher with nab-P/S versus nab-P/G (35.0% vs 25.0%, P = 0.49). The ORRs of the primary lesion for both arms were similar (30.0% and 25.0%, P = 0.72). Disease control rate was 70.0% in each arm. There was no significant difference in PFS and OS between the two arms (median PFS, 6.3 vs 5.7 months, P = 0.34; median OS, 10.2 vs 10.2 months, P = 0.92). Risks of hematological toxicity, liver injury and rash were significantly decreased in the nab-P/S arm.

CONCLUSIONS

A biweekly combination of nab-P/S yielded comparable efficacy with nab-P/G but improved safety profile. It may be a promising and convenient alternative as first-line and neoadjuvant settings for advanced PDAC.

Early ctDNA response to chemotherapy. A potential surrogate marker for overall survival

AIM

The aim of the study was to compare ctDNA response rate and objective response rate as surrogate markers for overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic cancer treated with chemotherapy.

METHODS

The study included 420 patients distributed in five cohorts with colorectal, ovarian, and non-small cell lung cancer. It represents a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in prospective biomarker studies and clinical trials. All patients had ctDNA measured before start of treatment and at the first evaluation of objective response. ctDNA response rate was defined as the fraction of patients converting from a measurable level at baseline to an unmeasurable level at the first evaluation of objective response. Aberrant, tumour specific, methylated DNA was measured in plasma. The method involves DNA isolation, bisulphite conversion and droplet digital PCR. The primary outcome measure was the correlation between ctDNA response rate, overall response rate (ORR) and median survival.

RESULTS

There was moderate correlation between ctDNA response rate and objective response at first evaluation (R² = 0.68). The same applied to ctDNA response rate and ORR (R² = 0.57). ctDNA held prognostic information in all the investigated tumour types (p < 0.05). There was a high correlation between ctDNA response and median survival across the included tumour types and treatments (R² = 0.99) clearly outperforming both response at first evaluation and ORR (R² = 0.70 and 0.57, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that ctDNA response might serve as a surrogate marker for OS. If validated, it may have great implications on the approval of new drugs.

Use of Gemcitabine plus Carboplatin is Associated with Poor Outcomes in Urothelial Carcinoma Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4-5

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes with gemcitabine-carboplatin (GCb), the standard treatment for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) who are ineligible for cisplatin-based regimens, in advanced UC patients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 mL/min.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cohort study involving GCb-treated advanced UC patients with GFR < 60 mL/min (n=89) was performed. Clinical outcomes were compared between subgroups with GFR < 30 mL/min and GFR ≥ 30 mL/min but < 60 mL/min.

Results

Most baseline characteristics were comparable between the two subgroups. Patients with GFR < 30 mL/min had a significantly lower objective response rate (12.5%) compared to those with higher GFR levels (56.7%) (p=0.004). The number of GCb cycles was significantly lower in patients with GFR < 30 mL/min (median 2 cycles) than in those with higher GFR levels (median 6 cycles) (p=0.002). Compared to those with GFR ≥ 30 mL/min but < 60 mL/min, patients with GFR < 30 mL/min showed significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001 for both). Further stratification of patient subgroups according to their GFR (i.e., GFR ≥ 45 mL/min but < 60 mL/min vs. GFR ≥ 30 mL/min but < 45 mL/min vs. GFR < 30 mL/min) revealed significantly different PFS and OS (p < 0.001 for both).

Conclusion

The use of GCb is discouraged in advanced UC patients with GFR < 30 mL/min. Alternative therapeutic approaches with better efficacy are warranted for these patients.

Exploring the relationship between Overall Survival (OS), Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Objective Response Rate (ORR) in patients with advanced melanoma

PURPOSE

From 2011 to 2016, 13 randomized clinical trials with active controls were submitted to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of advanced melanoma. While regular approval is generally granted due to a substantial improvement in overall survival (OS), or a large, clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), accelerated approval can be granted based on incremental change in a surrogate end point reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, such as objective response (ORR) of large magnitude and long duration. However, the relationship between objective response rate and progression free survival or objective response rate and overall survival in advanced melanoma has not been established.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted analyses to assess the correlation of objective response rate with progression free survival as well as overall survival by examining all advanced melanoma trials submitted to the FDA between 2011 and 2016. In order to examine these relationships, associations between trial-level hazard ratio (HR) of progression free survival, hazard ration of survival and odds ratio of objective response rate were analyzed using a weighted linear regression model. Patient-level responder analyses comparing progression free survival and overall survival between patients with and without an objective response were performed using pooled data from all studies.

RESULTS

In the trial-level analysis, the linear relationships between progression free survival and objective response rate, and overall survival and objective response rate were weak (R²_adj = 0.019 and 0.093, respectively). The linear relationship between overall survival and progression free survival (R²_adj = 0.075) was also weak. In the patient-level responder analyses, patients who achieved a response had better progression free survival and overall survival compared with non-responders in both the control drug treatment and the experimental drug treatment.

CONCLUSION

Based on this analysis, use of objective response rate as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival or progression free survival in this population appears not appropriate. However, due to the nature of heterogeneity, interpretation needs to be cautious.

Phase I study of liposomal irinotecan in patients with metastatic breast cancer: findings from the expansion phase

Purpose

Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains incurable and is associated with low survival rates. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan in heavily pretreated patients with mBC, with or without active brain metastases (BM).

Methods

Following the dose escalation phase and determination of recommended phase 2 dose, the expansion phase of this phase I, open-label, non-randomized study, assigned adult women to cohorts based on mBC subtype: cohort 1, hormone receptor +/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2−; cohort 2, triple-negative breast cancer; or cohort 3, any mBC subtype with active BM. Patients received liposomal irinotecan 50 or 70 mg/m² free base every 2 weeks. Here, we report secondary outcomes including best overall response (BOR), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

Results

For non-central nervous system (non-CNS) disease across all cohorts (intent-to-treat population, N = 29), the ORR was 34.5% (95% confidence interval: 17.94–54.33), with a BOR of partial response in 10 patients (34.5%), stable disease in five (17.2%), progressive disease in 10 (34.5%); four patients were unevaluable (13.8%). The ORR for the CNS cohort was 30.0% (95% confidence interval: 6.67–65.25) using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Common grade 3 or higher TEAEs were diarrhea (27.6%), nausea (17.2%), fatigue (13.8%), asthenia (10.3%), and hypokalemia (10.3%). Serious treatment-related TEAEs were reported in six patients (20.7%). No treatment-related TEAEs resulted in death.

Conclusions

Liposomal irinotecan monotherapy demonstrated antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with mBC, with or without BM. The observed safety profile was consistent with that in previous studies.

Clinical trial registration: Trial registration ID NCT01770353.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-020-05995-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Association of lenvatinib plasma concentration with clinical efficacy and adverse events in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the association between the trough plasma concentration of lenvatinib with the objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with HCC who received lenvatinib were enrolled. We examined the median trough concentration (C_{trough median}) of plasma lenvatinib until the first clinical response evaluation. The receiver-operating characteristic curve was drawn to show the discrimination potential of the C_{trough median} for the ORR, using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Adverse events were graded based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (ver. 5.0).

RESULTS

The C_{trough median} values in the complete response and partial response group were significantly higher than those in the stable disease and progressive disease groups. The ORR was significantly higher in the high-C_{trough median} group (≥ 42.68 ng/mL) than in the low-C_{trough median} group (< 42.68 ng/mL) (80.0% vs. 18.2%; p = 0.0089). Although there was no difference in the occurrence of most adverse events between the high- and low-C_{trough median} groups, the occurrence of any grade anorexia (100.0% vs. 45.5%; p = 0.0124) and grade 3 serious hypertension (70.0% vs. 18.2%; p = 0.0300) was significantly higher in the high-C_{trough median} group than in the low-C_{trough median} group. Multivariate analysis showed that high-C_{trough median} was significantly associated with ORR development (odds ratio, 15.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-138.16; p = 0.0168).

CONCLUSION

Maintaining C_{trough median} above 42.68 ng/mL was crucial for achieving the ORR in patients with HCC.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced SCLC.

METHODS

We searched published randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effect of ICIs combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone on SCLC. The extracted data included the number of people who achieved an objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), the hazard ratio (HR) of progression-free survival (PFS), and the overall survival (OS) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

Six RCTs involving 2477 patients were included. Compared with chemotherapy alone, patients receiving an ICI combined with chemotherapy had a significantly longer PFS (HR, 0.91; 95% CI 0.88-0.95, p < 0.00001) and OS (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.89-0.96, p = 0.0001). The ORR increased, but the difference was not statistically significant (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.99-1.12, p = 0.13). There was no significant difference in the DCR between the two treatment regimens; however, in patients treated with an ICI, fatigue, rashes, diarrhea, and elevated aminotransferase enzymes were significantly increased (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ICI combined with chemotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone with respect to PFS and OS in patients with advanced SCLC.

Does a ketogenic diet as an adjuvant therapy for drug treatment enhance chemotherapy sensitivity and reduce target lesions in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic Her-2-negative breast cancer? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have indicated that a ketogenic diet can be used as an adjuvant therapy to enhance sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in cancer patients. However, there are no sufficient data and no consistent international treatment guidelines supporting a ketogenic diet as an adjuvant therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Therefore, this trial was designed to observe whether irinotecan with a ketogenic diet can promote sensitivity to chemotherapy and remit target lesions in locally recurrent or metastatic Her-2-negative breast cancer patients.

METHODS/DESIGN

This trial aims to recruit 518 women with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer admitted to the Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute (Shenyang, China) in northeast China. All patients will be randomly assigned into the combined intervention group (n = 259) or the control group (n = 259), followed by treatment with irinotecan + ketogenic diet or irinotecan + normal diet, respectively. The primary endpoints are sensitivity to irinotecan and the objective response rate of target lesions; the secondary endpoints include quality of life scores (EORTC QLQ-C30), progression-free survival, overall survival time, incidence of adverse events, and cost-effectiveness. The endpoints will be evaluated at baseline (before drug administration), during treatment, 4 weeks after treatment completion, and every 3months (beginning 2 months after treatment completion).

DISCUSSION

This trial attempts to investigate whether irinotecan treatment with a ketogenic diet for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer among women in northeast China can enhance the disease's sensitivity to chemotherapy and reduce target lesions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ID: ChiCTR1900024597. Registered on 18 July 2019. Protocol Version: 1.1, 24 February 2017.

A Randomized Parallel Controlled Phase II Trial of Recombinant Human Endostatin Added to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

To explore the potential advantage of preoperative anti-angiogenosis therapy, we implemented a study to evaluate the efficacy of recombinant human endostatin (EN) in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of stage III breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-seven patients were randomized to neoadjuvant TEC (docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide) or to EN+TEC, followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included pathologic complete response (pCR), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Patients receiving EN+TEC achieved significantly higher ORR (81.82%; 36/44) compared with those receiving TEC (58.14%; 25/43; P=0.016). There was a non-significant trend of increased pCR with EN treatment (15.91% vs. 6.98%). The median follow-up was 54 months and revealed a significantly higher RFS with EN+TEC (median, 67.3 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 61.0-73.7 months), compared with TEC (median, 55.0 months; 95% CI, 48.3-61.7 months; P =0.014). EN+TEC also significantly improved OS (74.2 months; 95% CI, 68.9-79.6 months), compared with TEC (59.1 months; 95% CI, 52.0-66.1 months; P =0 .006). The 3- and 5-year OS rates are estimated to be 88.5% and 82.8% with EN+TEC and 76.7% and 54.4% with TEC, respectively. Cox proportional regression analyses showed that EN+TEC was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.377; 95% CI, 0.418-0.959; P =0 .041). There was no significant difference in adverse events between EN+TEC and TEC.

CONCLUSION

The combination of EN+TEC neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved the ORR and OS, suggesting a benefit of adding anti-angiogenesis to standard chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer.

Objective response rate assessment in oncology: Current situation and future expectations

The tumor objective response rate (ORR) is an important parameter to demonstrate the efficacy of a treatment in oncology. The ORR is valuable for clinical decision making in routine practice and a significant end-point for reporting the results of clinical trials. World Health Organization and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are anatomic response criteria developed mainly for cytotoxic chemotherapy. These criteria are based on the visual assessment of tumor size in morphological images provided by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging. Anatomic response criteria may not be optimal for biologic agents, some disease sites, and some regional therapies. Consequently, modifications of RECIST, Choi criteria and Morphologic response criteria were developed based on the concept of the evaluation of viable tumors. Despite its limitations, RECIST v1.1 is validated in prospective studies, is widely accepted by regulatory agencies and has recently shown good performance for targeted cancer agents. Finally, some alternatives of RECIST were developed as immune-specific response criteria for checkpoint inhibitors. Immune RECIST criteria are based essentially on defining true progressive disease after a confirmatory imaging. Some graphical methods may be useful to show longitudinal change in the tumor burden over time. Tumor tissue is a tridimensional heterogenous mass, and tumor shrinkage is not always symmetrical; thus, metabolic response assessments using positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/CT may reflect the viability of cancer cells or functional changes evolving after anticancer treatments. The metabolic response can show the benefit of a treatment earlier than anatomic shrinkage, possibly preventing delays in drug approval. Computer-assisted automated volumetric assessments, quantitative multimodality imaging in radiology, new tracers in nuclear medicine and finally artificial intelligence have great potential in future evaluations.

Venetoclax combination therapy in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: A single institution experience

Venetoclax (VEN) is a selective BCL-2 inhibitor that has been shown to be effective when used in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) for treatment-naïve, elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Data on its use in the relapsed/refractory setting are limited. A retrospective analysis was performed among 14 patients with relapsed or refractory AML treated with VEN combination therapy at the University of California Los Angeles from 2018-2019. Eight patients received VEN in combination with azacitidine, 5 patients with decitabine, and 1 patient with LDAC. The majority (10 patients, 71.4%) had adverse cytogenetics. Three patients (21.4%) had undergone an allogeneic stem cell transplant prior to VEN therapy, and 5 patients (35.7%) had leukemia that failed HMA therapy prior. The objective response rate (ORR) was 35.7% (3 patients achieved complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery and 2 patients achieved partial remission). Three patients (21.4%) were successfully transitioned to either allogeneic bone marrow transplant (2 patients) or donor lymphocyte infusion (1 patient). Seven patients (50.0%) developed a grade 3 or greater infection following VEN therapy, and 3 patients (21.4%) developed a grade 3 or greater intracranial hemorrhage. Three patients experienced early death within 30 days of therapy (2 from infection, 1 from bleeding). The median overall survival (OS) was 4.7 months, and the 1-year OS rate was 23.6% (95% CI 4.4-51.2) for the entire patient cohort. Overall, the response rate was not inferior to that with conventional salvage chemotherapy, but there were notable complications as a result of prolonged cytopenias.

Phase II Study of Eribulin Mesylate Administered Biweekly in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), whose disease progressed on prior chemotherapy, have a poor prognosis. Eribulin, a microtubule dynamics inhibitor, extends overall survival in previously treated MBC. The most common adverse event associated with eribulin is neutropenia, which may result in dose interruptions or reductions. A modified biweekly dosing schedule of eribulin was assessed for efficacy as well as improvements in hematologic toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II study, previously treated (2-5 chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease) patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative MBC received intravenous eribulin 1.4 mg/m² over 2 to 5 minutes on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The primary study endpoints were objective response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial responses [PR]) and disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + stable disease [SD]).

RESULTS

Among 58 treated patients, the ORR was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-24%), DCR (CR, n = 1; PR, n = 6; SD, n = 30) was 65%, and the median progression-free survival was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.9-4.1 months). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was 31%; 50% of all patients, and 78% of patients with neutropenia (all grades), received hematopoietic growth-factor support.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety results obtained with a biweekly eribulin schedule in this phase II trial appear similar to those associated with the approved eribulin schedule (1.4 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) reported in the EMBRACE study.

Irinotecan plus S-1 versus S-1 in patients with previously treated recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer (ESWN 01): a prospective randomized, multicenter, open-labeled phase 3 trial

Background

The benefit of systemic treatments in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) which has progressed after chemotherapy is still uncertain and optimal regimens based on randomized trials have not yet been established. We aimed to compare the efficacy of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 monotherapy in recurrent or metastatic ESCC patients who had resistance to platinum- or taxane-based chemotherapy.

Methods

We conducted a prospective randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial in 15 centers across China. Eligible patients were adults with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic ESCC, and were randomly assigned (ratio, 1:1) to receive either irinotecan plus S-1 (intravenous infusion of irinotecan [160 mg/m²] on day 1 and oral S-1 [80–120 mg] on days 1–10, repeated every 14 days) or oral S-1 monotherapy (80–120 mg/day on days 1–14, repeated every 21 days) using a central computerized minimization procedure. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Between December 23, 2014 and July 25, 2016, we screened 148 patients and randomly assigned 123 patients to receive either irinotecan plus S-1 regimen (n = 61) or S-1 monotherapy (n = 62). After a median follow-up of 29.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.5–40.9 months), the median PFS was significantly longer in the irinotecan plus S-1 group than in the S-1 monotherapy group (3.8 months [95% CI 2.9–4.3 months] vs. 1.7 months [95% CI 1.4–2.7 months], hazard ratio = 0.58, 95% CI 0.38–0.86, P = 0.006). The objective response rates were 24.6% in the irinotecan plus S-1 group and 9.7% in the S-1 monotherapy group (P = 0.002). The patients in the irinotecan plus S-1 group presented with increased rates of grade 3–4 leukopenia (16.4% vs. 0%), neutropenia (14.8% vs. 1.6%), and nausea (4.9% vs. 0%). No significant difference in grade 3–4 diarrhea and no treatment-related deaths were observed in both groups.

Conclusions

The combination of irinotecan with S-1 was similarly tolerable but significantly prolonged PFS compared to S-1 monotherapy as a second- or third-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic ESCC.

Clinical Trial Registration NCT02319187. Registered on December 9, 2014

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40880-019-0359-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Correlation between the magnitude of best tumor response and patient survival in nivolumab therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The correlation between the magnitudes of best tumor response (bTR) and patient survival in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains unclear. In this article, we retrospectively investigated the prognostic association of the magnitude of bTR in nivolumab therapy for mRCC. Fifty-five patients treated with nivolumab after failure of at least one molecular-targeted therapy were evaluated. Assessment of the magnitude of bTR was based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v.1.1. Endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after the initiation of nivolumab therapy. In regard to the magnitude of bTR, complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were observed in three (5.46%), 15 (27.3%), 19 (34.5%), and 18 (32.7%) patients, respectively. PFS and OS were significantly correlated with the magnitude of bTR (median PFS: not reached (N.R.) [95% confidence interval (CI) 16.8-N.R.] vs. 13.0 [8.38-56.0] vs. 5.95 [4.27-7.30] vs. 1.92 [0.53-3.91] months, p < 0.0001; OS: N.R. [N.R.-N.R.] vs. N.R. [21.4-N.R.] vs. 23.3 [23.3-N.R.] vs. 7.36 [1.41-N.R.] months, p < 0.0001). In addition, multivariate analyses show that the magnitude of bTR was an independent factor for PFS (p < 0.0001) and OS (p = 0.0010). In conclusion, this retrospective study shows the significant correlation between the magnitude of bTR and patient survival in nivolumab therapy for mRCC. The magnitude of bTR can be an effective surrogate marker for survival.

Real-world use of sunitinib in Japanese patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: results from a post-marketing surveillance study

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib is approved for the treatment of progressive, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic disease. Safety and efficacy data in Japanese patients are limited. We report outcomes from a post-marketing surveillance study of sunitinib treatment in Japanese patients.

METHODS

Sunitinib 37.5 mg once daily was orally administered in Japanese patients aged ≥ 15 years with pNETs. The primary endpoints included adverse events (AEs) occurring during the observation period of 168 days and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Sunitinib was administered in 62 patients with pNETs. The median duration of treatment was 165 days. At 168 days from the start of treatment, 31 patients were still receiving sunitinib treatment and treatment continuation rate was 50.0%. Of the 31 patients who discontinued treatment, 18 (58.1%) discontinued because of AEs and 16 (51.6%) patients discontinued due to insufficient clinical effect. Of the 18 patients who discontinued due to AEs, 10 did so within 42 days of treatment initiation. The most common all-grade AEs were platelet count decreased (33.9%), diarrhea (29.0%), neutrophil count decreased (27.4%), hypertension (24.2%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (24.2%). In the 51 patients eligible for the efficacy analysis, ORR was 13.7% (95% confidence interval, 5.7-26.3) and clinical benefit rate was 70.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no new safety concerns in real-world use of sunitinib in Japanese patients with pNETs. The short treatment duration likely led to low tumor response. Appropriate AEs management through dose interruption/reduction is essential for sunitinib treatment success in this patient population.

Alternate Endpoints for Phase II Trials in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

In phase II trials for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), the objective response rate (ORR) is traditionally used as a primary endpoint. However, the validity of the ORR as a primary endpoint has never been systematically examined. Therefore, a literature-based analysis of phase II trials for NETs was performed to identify valid alternative endpoints for predicting median progression-free survival (PFS) in clinical trials for NETs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Phase II trials of medical treatment for advanced NETs were identified based on a systematic search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

RESULTS

A total of 22 trials were identified, and 1,310 patients and 27 treatment arms were included in the analysis. There was no significant relationship between the ORR and median PFS (r = .374; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.051 to 0.800; p = .085). Conversely, 12-month PFS rates showed very strong correlations with median PFS (r = .929; 95% CI, 0.831-1.027; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The results of the present analysis indicate that the ORR is not significantly correlated with median PFS and suggest that 12-month PFS rates are good alternate endpoints for screening phase II trials for NETs.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Phase II trials are screening trials that seek to identify agents with sufficient activity to continue development. Thus, earlier endpoints are preferable, and the objective response rate (ORR) has been traditionally used as a surrogate endpoint in phase II trials for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, the present study showed that the ORR was not significantly correlated with median progression-free survival (PFS). On the other hand, the 12-month PFS rate showed very strong correlation with median PFS and is considered a good alternate endpoint for screening phase II trials for NETs.

Nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 as first-line followed by S-1 maintenance for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a single-arm phase II trial

PURPOSE

We conducted a single-arm prospective phase II study to determine the efficacy and safety of the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel and S-1 followed by S-1 maintenance therapy.

METHODS

Nab-paclitaxel was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 at 120 mg/m². S-1 at 120 mg/day (for surface area ≥ 1.5 m²), 100 mg/day (for surface area between 1.25-1.5 m²), and 80 mg/day (for surface area < 1.25 m²) were given two times daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. Patients who achieved response and stable disease after 6 cycles were given S-1 maintenance treatment in the same schedule until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity developed. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Between 01/2015 and 07/2017, 32 patients were enrolled.

RESULTS

The ORR in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 32) was 53.1%, and the DCR was 87.5%. In the 30 evaluable patients, the ORR and DCR were 56.7 and 93.3%, respectively. The median follow-up time was 18 (range 12-36) months, the median PFS was 6.2 (range 4.4-8) months, and the median OS was 13.6 (range 8.7-18.5) months. The incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was 27.6%. Other grade 3 adverse events included 1 (3.1%) hand-foot syndrome, 1 (3.1%) rash and 2 (6.3%) diarrheas.

CONCLUSIONS

Nab-paclitaxel and S-1 regimen has presented encouraging ORR, OS, and manageable toxicities as first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

A phase II, multicenter, single-arm trial of eribulin as first- or second-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer: evaluation of efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes

PURPOSE

Although eribulin is a suitable option for early-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), data on first- or second-line use of eribulin for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative MBC are still limited. Therefore, we conducted a phase II trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of eribulin for first- or second-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative MBC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study in Japan. Eligible patients were women with histologically confirmed HER2-negative MBC without chemotherapy or only one chemotherapy line for MBC. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) and the secondary endpoints included the clinical benefit rate (ORR + stable disease for 6 months; CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients with HER2-negative MBC were enrolled between March 2013 and February 2017 (data cut-off July 31, 2017). The ORR was 37.1% (95% CI 21.1-53.2%). The CBR was 54.3% (95% CI 37.8-70.8%). The median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI 2.7-9.4 months) and median OS was 21.4 months (95% CI 11.5-32.9 months). Common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (42.9%) but febrile neutropenia (2.9%). Although the majority of non-hematological adverse events were mild in severity, one patient died of pneumonitis. In HRQoL analysis, eribulin appeared to maintain HRQoL of many patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Eribulin as first- or second-line chemotherapy is effective and has manageable toxicity for patients with HER2-negative MBC.

Phase III study of dulanermin (recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand/Apo2 ligand) combined with vinorelbine and cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background Dulanermin is a recombinant soluble human Apo2 ligand/tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) that activates apoptotic pathways by binding to proapoptotic death receptor (DR) 4 and DR5. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dulanermin combined with vinorelbine and cisplatin (NP) as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Experimental design Patients were randomly assigned to receive NP chemotherapy (vinorelbine 25 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 30 mg/m² on days 2 to 4) for up to six cycles plus dulanermin (75 μg/kg on days 1 to 14) or placebo every three weeks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety evaluation. Results Between October 2009 and June 2012, 452 untreated patients with stage IIIB to IV NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive dulanermin plus NP (n = 342) and placebo plus NP (n = 110). Median PFS was 6.4 months in the dulanermin arm versus 3.5 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio (HR), 0.4034; 95% CI, 0.3181 to 0.5117, p < 0.0001). ORR was 46.78% in the dulanermin arm versus 30.00% in the placebo arm (p = 0.0019). Median OS was 14.6 months in the dulanermin arm versus 13.9 months in the placebo arm (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.21, p = 0.64). The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were oligochromemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and oligocythemia. Overall incidence of AEs, grade ≥ 3 AEs, and serious AEs were similar across the two arms. Conclusion Addition of dulanermin to the NP regimen significantly improved PFS and ORR. However, our results showed that the combination of dulanermin with chemotherapy had a synergic activity and favorable toxic profile in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Phase II randomised discontinuation trial of cabozantinib in patients with advanced solid tumours

BACKGROUND

Cabozantinib is an inhibitor of tyrosine kinases, including MET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, AXL and RET. This multi-cohort phase II randomised discontinuation trial explored anticancer activity of cabozantinib in nine tumour types.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cabozantinib was administered (100 mg, once daily) to patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic cancers. Those with stable disease at week 12 were randomised 1:1 to cabozantinib or placebo. Primary end-points were objective response rate (ORR) at week 12 and progression-free survival (PFS) in the randomised phase.

RESULTS

A total of 526 patients were enrolled. The highest ORR was observed in ovarian cancer (OC) (21.7%); the largest PFS benefit was observed in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) (median 5.5 versus 1.4 months for placebo; hazard ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.04, 0.52). Disease control rates were >40% for CRPC, OC, melanoma, metastatic breast cancer (MBC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-small cell lung cancer. Median duration of response ranged from 3.3 (MBC) to 11.2 months (OC). Encouraging efficacy results and symptomatic improvements prompted early suspension of the randomised stage and conversion to open-label non-randomised expansion cohorts. Dose reductions to manage adverse events (AEs) occurred in 48.7% of patients. The most frequent grade III-IV AEs were fatigue (12.4%), diarrhoea (10.5%), hypertension (10.5%) and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (8.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical antitumour activity of cabozantinib was observed in a subset of tumour types: CRPC and OC were evaluated further in expansion cohorts. Phase III programs were initiated in CRPC and HCC. Interpretation of efficacy outcomes was limited by early termination of the randomised portion of the trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00940225.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangement predicts better prognosis in NSCLC patients: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are predictive markers of the treatment benefit from selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). However, their prognostic roles remained uncertain. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the prognosis of ALK+ NSCLC patients in the treatment of surgery, chemotherapy, and/or EGFR-TKI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were thoroughly searched to identify relevant studies. Primary endpoints of this study included overall survival (OS), recurrence/progression free survival (RFS/PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). All statistical analyses were performed via REVIEW MANAGER (version 5.3).

RESULTS

In total, 15 studies involving 4981 NSCLC patients were included. This study demonstrated that smoking status profoundly influenced prognosis of ALK related NSCLC. In the general population with NSCLC, compared with ALK- arm, ALK+ arm obtained a significantly better prognosis (HR=0.81 for OS, 95% CI=0.72-0.91; 0.80 for RFS/PFS, 95% CI=0.70-0.90), even after further stratification analysis according to disease stage. However, in the non-smoking population with NSCLC, compared with ALK- arm, those in the ALK+ arm had a worse prognosis (HR=1.65 for OS, 95% CI=1.28-2.12; 1.23 for RFS/PFS, 95% CI=1.05-1.44). Furthermore, ALK+ patients experienced a significantly higher ORR in pemetrexed-based chemotherapy but not in EGFR-TKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking status had a profound influence on the ALK-related prognosis of NSCLC. ALK rearrangement predicted a better prognosis in the general population with NSCLC, but a poor survival in the non-smoking population. Therefore, stratification according to smoking status is strongly recommended for future studies exploring ALK-related prognosis.

Long-Term Response to Sunitinib Treatment in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Pooled Analysis of Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

We characterized clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with sunitinib who were long-term responders (LTRs), defined as patients having progression-free survival (PFS) > 18 months.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of data from 5714 patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib in 8 phase II/III clinical trials and the expanded access program. Duration on-study and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between LTRs and patients with PFS ≤ 18 months ("others"). PFS and overall survival (OS) were summarized using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

RESULTS

Overall, 898 (15.7%) patients achieved a long-term response and 4816 (84.3%) patients did not achieve long-term response. The median (range) duration on-study was 28.6 (16.8-70.7) months in LTRs and 5.5 (0-68.8) months in others. ORR was 51% in LTRs versus 14% in others (P < .0001). Median PFS in LTRs was 32.11 months and median OS was not reached. LTRs had higher percentage of early tumor shrinkage ≥ 10% at the first scan (67.1% vs. 51.2%; P = .0018) and greater median maximum on-study tumor shrinkage from baseline (-56.9 vs. -27.1; P < .0001) versus others. White race, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, time from diagnosis to treatment ≥ 1 year, clear cell histology, no liver metastasis, lactate dehydrogenase ≤ 1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN), corrected calcium ≤ 10 mg/dL, hemoglobin greater than the lower limit of normal, platelets less than or equal to ULN, body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2, and low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were associated with LTR.

CONCLUSION

A subset of patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib achieved long-term response. LTRs had improved ORR, PFS, and OS.

ENGOT-ov-6/TRINOVA-2: Randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus trebananib or placebo in women with recurrent partially platinum-sensitive or resistant ovarian cancer

AIMS

Trebananib, a peptide-Fc fusion protein, inhibits angiogenesis by inhibiting binding of angiopoietin-1/2 to the receptor tyrosine kinase Tie2. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study evaluated whether trebananib plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Women with recurrent ovarian cancer (platinum-free interval ≤12 months) were randomised to intravenous PLD 50 mg/m² once every 4 weeks plus weekly intravenous trebananib 15 mg/kg or placebo. PFS was the primary end-point; key secondary end-points were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR). Owing to PLD shortages, enrolment was paused for 13 months; the study was subsequently truncated.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-three patients were enrolled. Median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI, 7.2-9.0) in the trebananib arm and 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.8-8.2) in the placebo arm, with a hazard ratio of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.68-1.24). However, because the proportional hazards assumption was not fulfilled, the standard Cox model did not provide a reliable estimate of the hazard ratio. ORR in the trebananib arm was 46% versus 21% in the placebo arm (odds ratio, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.78-6.64). Median DOR was improved (trebananib, 7.4 months [95% CI, 5.7-7.6]; placebo, 3.9 months [95% CI, 2.3-6.5]). Adverse events with a greater incidence in the trebananib arm included localised oedema (61% versus 32%), ascites (29% versus 9%) and vomiting (45% versus 33%).

CONCLUSIONS

Trebananib demonstrated anticancer activity in this phase 3 study, indicated by improved ORR and DOR. Median PFS was not improved. No new safety signals were identified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01281254.

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Pegfilgrastim in Patients Receiving First-Line FOLFOX/Bevacizumab or FOLFIRI/Bevacizumab for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Final Results of the Pegfilgrastim and Anti-VEGF Evaluation Study (PAVES)

BACKGROUND

Pegfilgrastim's role in reducing the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving chemotherapy plus bevacizumab was not previously evaluated in a prospective study. The present phase III, double-blind trial evaluated the efficacy of pegfilgrastim versus placebo in reducing the incidence of grade 3/4 FN in patients with advanced CRC receiving bevacizumab combined with first-line chemotherapy (FOLFOX [leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin] or FOLFIRI [leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan]).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years with locally advanced or metastatic CRC were randomized 1:1 to placebo or 6 mg of pegfilgrastim ∼24 hours after receiving chemotherapy plus bevacizumab every 14 days. The study treatment period included 4 cycles, but patients could continue treatment for ≤ 60 months. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade 3/4 FN in the first 4 cycles. The secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival, and progression-free survival, analyzed at the end of the long-term follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total of 845 patients were randomized from November 2009 to January 2012 (422, pegfilgrastim; 423, placebo). Pegfilgrastim significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3/4 FN in the first 4 treatment cycles (pegfilgrastim, 2.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1%-4.3%; placebo, 5.7%; 95% CI, 3.7%-8.3%; odds ratio [OR], 0.41; P = .014). No significant differences were observed between the 2 arms in ORR (OR, 1.15; P = .330), overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.94; P = .440), and progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.93; P = .300).

CONCLUSION

Pegfilgrastim reduced the FN incidence in patients with advanced CRC receiving chemotherapy and bevacizumab. Administration of pegfilgrastim was tolerable and did not negatively affect the tumor response or survival in this patient population.

Phase II trial of weekly nab-paclitaxel for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Kumamoto thoracic oncology study group (KTOSG) trial 1301

OBJECTIVES

We performed an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II study (UMIN ID 000010532) to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel for previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC who experienced failure of prior platinum-doublet chemotherapy received weekly nab-paclitaxel (100mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 21-day cycle until disease progression or the development of unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point of the study was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were enrolled between September 2013 and April 2015. The ORR was 31.7% (90% confidence interval, 19.3%-44.1%), which met the primary objective of the study. Median progression-free survival was 4.9 months (95% confidence interval, 2.4-7.4 months) and median overall survival was 13.0 (95% confidence interval, 8.0-18.0 months) months. The median number of treatment cycles was four (range, 1-17) over the entire study period, and the median dose intensity was 89.1mg/m(2) per week. Hematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included neutropenia (19.5%) and leukopenia (17.1%), with no cases of febrile neutropenia being observed. Individual nonhematologic toxicities of grade 3 or higher occurred with a frequency of <5%.

CONCLUSION

Weekly nab-paclitaxel was associated with acceptable toxicity and a favorable ORR in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC. Our results justify the undertaking of a phase III trial comparing nab-paclitaxel with docetaxel in this patient population.

A phase II, multicenter, single-arm trial of eribulin as first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

The treatment goals for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are prolonging survival and improving the quality of life. Eribulin, a non-taxane tubulin inhibitor, demonstrated improved survival in previous studies and also showed mild toxicity when used in late-line therapy for MBC. We conducted a phase II study to investigate the efficacy of eribulin mesylate as the first-line chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative MBC. This was a phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter trial conducted in Japan. Patients with HER2-negative MBC received intravenous eribulin (1.4 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle). The primary efficacy outcome was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary outcomes included time to treatment failure, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. A total of 35 patients were enrolled and received a median of 8 (range 1–21) cycles of eribulin therapy. ORR and clinical benefit rate were 54.3 and 62.9 %, respectively. Median PFS was 5.8 months and median OS was 35.9 months. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 63 % of patients. The majority of non-hematological adverse events were mild in severity. The present trial demonstrated that eribulin has antitumor activity comparable with other key established cytotoxic agents with acceptable safety and tolerability. Thus, eribulin as first-line chemotherapy might be beneficial for patients with HER2-negative MBC.

Impact of prior anthracycline or taxane use on eribulin effectiveness as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer: results from two phase 2, multicenter, single-arm studies

Eribulin mesylate has efficacy in patients who have received ≥2 prior chemotherapies for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) including an anthracycline and taxane. Phase 2 trials showed clinical activity and acceptable tolerability of first-line eribulin (HER2− MBC; Study 206) and eribulin plus trastuzumab (HER2+ MBC; Study 208). Prespecified analyses evaluated efficacy by prior anthracycline and/or taxane use. Patients received eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m² IV; Days 1 and 8) and, in Study 208, trastuzumab (8 mg/kg IV/Cycle 1, then 6 mg/kg; Day 1) in 21-day cycles. Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and tolerability. In Study 206 (N = 56), 48 % of patients had received prior anthracycline, 46 % prior taxane, 36 % prior anthracycline and taxane, and 41 % were chemotherapy-naïve. In Study 208 (N = 52), these percentages were 21, 44, 17, and 52 %, respectively. In Study 206, ORR and median PFS were similar for anthracycline-pretreated (25.9 %, 5.8 months), taxane-pretreated (26.9 %, 5.8 months), anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated (25.0 %, 6.7 months), and anthracycline/taxane-naïve patients (30.4 %, 7.6 months). In Study 208, ORR/median PFS were 63.6 %/6.7 months among anthracycline-pretreated patients, 56.5 %/6.8 months among taxane-pretreated patients, 55.6 %/5.9 months among anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients, and 81.5 %/13.1 months among anthracycline/taxane-naïve patients. Tolerability was generally similar among subgroups. In these studies, first-line eribulin in HER2− MBC and eribulin/trastuzumab in HER2+ MBC was effective with acceptable tolerability, regardless of prior anthracycline/taxane treatment. Prior chemotherapy was associated with lower ORR and shorter PFS with eribulin/trastuzumab in HER2+ MBC but not with eribulin in HER2− MBC.

Trabectedin as a single-agent treatment of advanced breast cancer after anthracycline and taxane treatment: a multicenter, randomized, phase II study comparing 2 administration regimens

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of trabectedin for advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In an open-label, phase II, multicenter study, women with advanced breast cancer previously treated with ≤ 2 lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease, including both anthracyclines and taxanes, were randomized (1:1) to 3-hour infusions of trabectedin 1.3 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks (1/3 treatment arm) or 0.58 mg/m(2) every week for 3 of 4 weeks (3/4 treatment arm). The primary end point was objective response. Secondary end points included time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Fifty-two women (median age, 50 years; median chemotherapy agents, 4) were enrolled. Relative trabectedin dose intensities were 81% and 76% in the 1/3 and 3/4 treatment arms, respectively. Objective response rates were 12% (3 of 25) and 4% (1 of 27), respectively. Stable disease was observed in 14 (56%) and 11 (41%) patients in the 1/3 and 3/4 treatment arms, respectively, with median durations of 3.5 and 3.7 months. Median TTP and PFS were higher in the 1/3 treatment arm (3.1 months each) than in the 3/4 treatment arm (2.0 months each). At a median follow-up of 7 months in both treatment arms, median OS was not reached in the 1/3 treatment arm and was 9.4 months in the 3/4 treatment arm. The most frequent drug-related adverse events in the 1/3 and 3/4 treatment arms, respectively, were alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level increases (68% vs. 63%), nausea (56% vs. 59%), and asthenia (56% vs. 48%). Neutropenia and increases in ALT levels were the most frequent grade 3/4 events. Both types of events were usually transient and reversible.

CONCLUSION

In the population studied, trabectedin showed a manageable safety profile for both regimens analyzed. There were higher objective response rates and a longer PFS in the 1/3 treatment arm compared with the 3/4 treatment arm.