Camrelizumab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin for relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a highly curable disease, while novel therapy is needed for refractory or relapsed (R/R) patients. This phase II trial aimed to evaluate the role of camrelizumab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in R/R cHL patients.

METHODS

Transplant-eligible patients with R/R cHL were enrolled and received two 14-day cycles of camrelizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) and two 28-day cycles of camrelizumab 200 mg IV, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV, and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 15. Patients with partial response (PR) or stable disease received an additional cycle of combination therapy. Those who achieved complete response (CR) or PR proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The primary endpoint was the CR rate at the end of protocol therapy before ASCT.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were enrolled. At the end of protocol therapy, the objective response rate and CR rate were 94.9% (37/39) and 69.2% (27/39) in the evaluable set, and 88.1% (37/42) and 64.3% (27/42) in the full analysis set, respectively. Twenty-nine patients (69.0%) proceeded to ASCT, and 4 of 5 patients with PR achieved CR after ASCT. After a median follow-up of 20.7 months, the 12-month progression-free survival rate was 96.6% and the 12-month overall survival rate was 100%. Grade 3 or higher treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 28.6% of patients (12/42), mainly hematological toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Camrelizumab combined with GEMOX constitutes an effective salvage therapy for R/R cHL, proving to be relatively well-tolerated and facilitating ASCT in most patients, thus promoting sustained remission.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04239170. Registered on January 1, 2020.

Cost-effectiveness of immunotherapies for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

There are differences in the pharmacoeconomics of Immune checkpoint blocking (ICB) therapies for the treatment of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). However, no corresponding review studies have fully discussed the cost-effectiveness of ICBs in treating LSCC. The aim of this paper is to systematically review and evaluate all available pharmacoeconomic studies of ICBs for LSCC.

METHOD

The inclusion criteria were based on the population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study designs. An electronic search was conducted by June 2023, and the following databases were used: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Search keywords included 'Carcinoma', Non-Small-Cell Lung', 'Immunotherapy', and 'Economics, Medical'. The primary outcome was the cost-effectiveness analysis of ICB therapy in LSCC patients. Drummond Checklist was used to assess quality problems and possible bias in the study design of included pharmacoeconomic studies.

RESULTS

This review searched 15 articles on the economic evaluation of ICB treatment for LSCC. After a qualitative review of 15 studies, we concluded that nivolumab is more cost-effective as a monotherapy than chemotherapy alone. In the combination regimen, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy appears to be the most cost-effective option at present, but for Chinese payers with LSCC, locally developed treatments such as sintilimab or toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy are more cost-effective.

DISCUSSION

The inclusion of economic evaluation has heterogeneity in research design and outcomes, which can only support qualitative synthesis. Therefore, The results of this paper need to be treated with caution. For the Chinese market, instead of imported drugs, the possible cost-effectiveness of locally developed ICB therapies should be the focus of future research.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of PD-1 inhibitors as second-line therapy for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China: an economic evaluation based on network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several economic studies have assessed the cost-effectiveness of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors compared to second-line chemotherapy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, there is a lack of economic comparisons among the different PD-1 inhibitors.

AIM

This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, camrelizumab, and tislelizumab) in second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic ESCC within the Chinese healthcare system.

METHOD

The clinical trials were systematically retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. We established a fractional polynomials model to conduct a network meta-analysis, enabling the calculation of hazard ratios and expected survival rates. Economic outcomes were estimated using a partitioned survival model. The costs and utilities were gathered from published sources. The threshold for willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was set at three times China's per capita gross domestic product in 2022. Sensitivity analyses (SA) were performed to address uncertainties in the model.

RESULTS

Four phase III randomized controlled trials were included, evaluating the cost-effectiveness of four PD-1 inhibitors, camrelizumab, nivolumab, tislelizumab, and pembrolizumab, compared to chemotherapy for the second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic ESCC. For camrelizumab, nivolumab, tislelizumab, and pembrolizumab, the corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $27,375.43/QALY, $205,312.19/QALY, $9,266.73/QALY, and $220,368.10/QALY, respectively. The SA results indicated the robustness of the base analysis findings.

CONCLUSION

From the Chinese healthcare system, under the WTP of $38,253.48/QALY, tislelizumab is a cost-effective treatment option for the second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic ESCC.

Retrospective assessment of neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with induction chemotherapy: efficacy in laryngeal preservation for advanced hypopharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hypopharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) account for 25-30% of head and neck SCC. Total laryngectomy, while effective, compromises the quality of life. Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as Camrelizumab offer potential in laryngeal preservation. The study investigated Camrelizumab combined with TP regimen as a neoadjuvant therapy for laryngeal preservation in advanced hypopharyngeal and laryngeal SCC.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center on patients diagnosed with locally advanced SCC of the hypopharynx and larynx from October 1, 2019, to October 25, 2022. The efficacy of a first-line treatment combining Camrelizumab (200 mg) and TP regimen (Albumin-bound paclitaxel at 260 mg/m2 and Cisplatin at 60 mg/m2) was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), laryngectomy-free survival (LFS), and response rates.

RESULTS

Of the 71 included patients, the median age was 60.7 years. Post the first-line treatment, 90.1% demonstrated an overall response. The one-year and two-year OS rates were 91.5% and 84.3%, respectively. One-year and two-year PFS rates were 92.9% and 83.9%, respectively, with LFS at 85.6% and 73.2%. The initial T4 stage as significantly associated with reduced OS and LFS. Skin reaction was the predominant adverse event.

CONCLUSION

The Camrelizumab-TP regimen demonstrated promising results for advanced hypopharyngeal/laryngeal SCC patients, exhibiting high response rates, OS, and LFS, positioning it as a potential primary option for laryngeal preservation. Further comprehensive, randomized controlled studies are imperative to validate these initial observations and elucidate the regimen's full clinical efficacy in optimizing laryngeal outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: A phase II, single-arm study

PURPOSE

In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with oxaliplatin plus S-1 in patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

METHODS

In this single-arm, phase II clinical trial, patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were enrolled to receive three cycles of neoadjuvant camrelizumab and oxaliplatin plus S-1 every 3 weeks, followed by surgical resection and adjuvant therapy with the same regimen. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) (ypT0) rate and secondary endpoints were R0 resection rate, total pCR (tpCR, ypT0N0) rate, major pathological response (MPR) rate, downstaging, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Between September, 2020 and January, 2022, a total of 29 patients were enrolled in the present study, all of whom completed neoadjuvant therapy and underwent surgery. Three (10.3%) (95% CI: 2.2-27.4) patients achieved pCR as well as tpCR, 20 (69.0%) patients had MPR and 28 (96.6%) patients achieved R0 resection. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of any grade were observed in 24 (82.8%) patients. Immune-related adverse events of any grade were reported in 13 (44.8%) patients, whereas no grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

The neoadjuvant therapy with camrelizumab in combination with oxaliplatin and S-1 showed a modest pCR rate, and favorable MPR rate and safety profile in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Efficacy and safety of the combination of camrelizumab and apatinib in the treatment of liver cancer: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of camrelizumab and apatinib in the treatment of liver cancer and to furnish clinical recommendations for pharmacological interventions.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were scrutinized for research publications from their inception to 22 December 2023. Bibliographic perusal and data procurement were executed. The quality of the included studies was evaluated employing the MINORS tool. Meta-analysis was conducted utilizing Stata 15.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies involving 849 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The study revealed that the objective response rate (ORR) of the combined therapy was 28% (95% CI: 23%-34%), the disease control rate (DCR) was 69% (95% CI: 64%-73%), the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.87 months (95% CI: 4.96-6.78), the median overall survival (mOS) was 19.35 months (95% CI: 17.53-21.17), the incidence of any grade adverse events was 90% (95% CI: 85%-95%), and the occurrence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 49% (95% CI: 27%-71%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of camrelizumab and apatinib exhibits commendable effectiveness in the management of liver cancer; nevertheless, vigilance should be exercised concerning potential adverse reactions in clinical applications to enhance the safety of pharmacological interventions.

Oncological outcomes of sequential laparoscopic gastrectomy after treatment with camrelizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 for gastric cancer with serosal invasion

Objective

To explore the oncological outcomes of sequential laparoscopic gastrectomy after treatment with camrelizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 for the treatment of gastric cancer with serosal invasion.

Methods

This study is a retrospective cohort study and retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological data of 128 patients with serosal invasion gastric cancer (cT4NxM0) who received nab-paclitaxel + S-1(SAP) or camrelizumab + nab-paclitaxel + S-1 (C-SAP) regimen and underwent laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy in Fujian Union Hospital from March 2019 to December 2020. The patients were divided into SAP group and C-SAP group. The 2-years overall survival rate, 2-year recurrence free survival rate recurrence rate and initial recurrence time were compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 128 patients were included, including 90 cases in SAP group and 38 cases in C-SAP group. There were no significant differences in age, gender, gastrectomy method, surgical approach, R0 resection, nerve invasion, vascular invasion, total number of harvested lymph nodes, number of positive lymph nodes and major pathologic response (MPR) rate between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the proportion of ypT0, ypN0 and pCR rate in C-SAP group were significantly higher than those in SAP group (P<0.05). The 2-year OS of C-SAP group (80.7%) was higher than that of SAP group (67.8%), and the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.112); At 2 years after operation, the recurrence rate of C-SAP group (44.3%) was lower than that of SAP group (55.8%) (P = 0.097); Further analysis showed that the average time to recurrence in the C-SAP group was 18.9 months, which was longer than that in SAP group 13.1 months (P = 0.004); The 2-year recurrence free survival rate in C-SAP group was higher than that in SAP group (P=0.076); There was no significant difference in the overall survival time after recurrence between the two groups (P= 0.097).

Conclusion

Camrelizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy can improve the proportion of ypT0, ypN0 and pCR in patients, while prolonging the initial recurrence time of patients in the C-SAP group, but did not increase the immunotherapy/chemotherapy related side effects and postoperative complications.

Clinical efficacy of Camrelizumab combined with first-line chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

Objective

Exploring the clinical efficacy of camrelizumab in combination with first-line chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

Methods

The clinical data of 35 patients with ES-SCLC who received camrelizumab combined with EC or EP regimen in First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2020 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were OS, ORR and DCR. SPSS 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis, Kaplan-Meier curve and Log-Rank test analysis, and survival curve was drawn.

Results

The median PFS of 35 patients with SCLC was 7.4 months (95 % CI 6.75-9.81 months), .and the median OS was 12.5 months (95% CI,11.71-16.90 months). The ORR and DCR were 65.7 % and 74.3 %, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were mainly concentrated in grade 1-2, and the probability of occurrence of grade 3 or above was low. Reactive Cutaneous Capillary Endothelial Proliferation (RCCEP) was the most common, followed by nausea &vomit and anemia. The other common AEs included abnormal thyroid function, decreased neutrophil count, skin rash and leucopenia.

Conclusion

Camrelizumab in combination with first-line chemotherapy regimens prolonged OS and PFS in SCLC patients and showed efficacy and safety in real-world data.

Camrelizumab-induced oral lichenoid reaction with subepithelial CD4+ T-cell infiltration

INTRODUCTION

Camrelizumab is a novel anti-programed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody that has been investigated for the treatment of various malignancies. Increasing immune-related adverse events have been reported in clinical practice, with CD4+ T-cell-mediated-reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation being the most common. Camrelizumab-induced oral lichenoid reaction (OLR) appears to be a rare adverse effect compared with other anti-PD therapies induced OLR, with the main pathogenesis of activated CD8+ T cells mediating autoimmune reactions. Herein, we report a rare case of camrelizumab-induced OLR and a possible pathogenic mechanism of subepithelial CD4+ T-cell infiltration.

CASE REPORT

A 57-year-old male patient, who was diagnosed with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma three years prior, presented with a two-month history of oral erosion that developed while under camrelizumab therapy. Diffuse erythematous and erosive lesions surrounded by bilateral white lesions on the buccal mucosa were detected in his physical examination. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the lesions revealed the presence of basal keratinocyte degeneration and band-like subepithelial T-cell infiltration. The immunostaining for CD4 on T-cell was positive, while CD8 were sporadically positive. Flow cytometry showed a gradual increase in the CD4+ T-cell proportion in the peripheral blood, with the CD8+ T-cell percentage almost unchanged and in the normal range. We obtained a score of 6 based on the Naranjo algorithm, which means a probable adverse drug reaction.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

The patient exhibited notable improvement after two weeks of treatment with topical glucocorticoid without regulating his immunotherapy, and remained in stable condition in the follow-up.

DISCUSSION

This case may offer new insight to clinicians on the pathogenesis of anti-PD-1-induced OLR. More critically, it may provide some ideas for a more precise anti-PD therapy or corresponding combination therapy for patients becoming resistant to immunotherapy due to exhausted CD4+ T-cell responses in the tumor microenvironment.

Correlation analysis between camrelizumab trough concentration levels and efficacy or safety in East Asian patients with advanced lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy is approved across tumor types. However, only a fraction of patients benefits from immunotherapy, and biomarkers such as the expression of PD-L1, tumor mutational burden, and CXCL11 are expensive and suboptimal specificity for cancer patients. An exposure-response (E-R) relationship has been reported in many immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and the trough concentrations and other drug exposure metrics are broadly used to guide dosing decisions, assess exposure-outcomes relationships, and ultimately predict outcomes based on those relationships. However, the potential use of trough concentration levels for camrelizumab is still not clear.

METHODS

Blood samples were obtained at trough levels after doses 3 and 4 from 77 patients with advanced lung cancer who received camrelizumab (200 mg Q3 W) monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy. We optimized a competitive ELISA method to measure the trough concentration.

RESULTS

We found that the trough concentration was steady after 3 dose cycles, and the trough concentration level of camrelizumab was higher in patients who developed immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) than in those who did not (P < 0.05) but was not observed in disease progression and PFS (P > 0.05). Age (< 65 years old), no smoking history, and efficacy evaluation after 4-dose treatment were associated with PFS (P < 0.05), but no significance was observed in other clinical characteristics. Total bilirubin and albumin had an influence on trough concentration, and monocytes and albumin were independent risk factors for PFS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the trough concentration level of camrelizumab might be a risk factor for the occurrence of irAEs in advanced lung cancer, and using the immunotherapy as early as possible may bring better clinical outcomes.

Lenvatinib Combined with the PD-1 Inhibitor Camrelizumab in the Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer Caused Hemorrhagic Exfoliative Gastritis

Introduction

Patients with advanced primary liver cancer often lose the opportunity for surgery when they are found, and the treatment options are limited. Lenvatinib, as a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been used as the first-line treatment for advanced liver cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors, have been successfully used in advanced or metastatic liver cancer.

Case Presentation

We report a case of combined lenvatinib and the programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor camrelizumab in the treatment of primary liver cancer, in which the rare complication of full-thickness gastric mucosa exfoliation occurred. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the side effect of hemorrhagic exfoliative gastritis with the combination of lenvatinib and camrelizumab.

Conclusion

Hemorrhagic exfoliative gastritis is an extremely rare clinical complication. Lenvatinib inhibits vascular proliferation and could cause gastrointestinal perforation, which is considered to be the main factor, but whether camrelizumab plays a role in it or only causes gastrointestinal reactions leading to nausea and vomiting, resulting in gastric mucosal exfoliation bleeding, remains to be further explored.

Risk of reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation induced by camrelizumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Background

Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) is a common immune-related adverse event (irAE) related to camrelizumab. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of RCCEP and its association with patients' survival.

Methods

This retrospective study collected the data of consecutive patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received camrelizumab between January 2019 and December 2021. Baseline characteristics and peripheral blood biomarkers were collected. The outcomes were the occurrence of RCCEP and progression-free survival (PFS). The factors associated with RCCEP were analyzed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. The association between PFS and RCCEP occurrence was analyzed by the log-rank test.

Results

Among the 80 patients included, 24 (30.0%) developed RCCEP, and 56 did not. Among the patients with RCCEP, only four reported the occurrence of grade 3-4 RCCEP. The multivariable analysis revealed that a percentage of eosinophil (EOS%) >1.75% was significantly associated with a higher risk of RCCEP [odds ratio (OR) =4.484; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.139-17.651] and camrelizumab combined with an anti-angiogenic agent was significantly associated with a lower risk of RCCEP (OR =0.188; 95% CI: 0.055-0.639). The median PFS was numerically longer in patients with RCCEP than in those who did not (17 vs. 9 months, P=0.069). Patients who had baseline EOS% >1.75% and received camrelizumab without an anti-angiogenic agent had a longer median PFS than those who did not (17 vs. 9 months, P=0.011).

Conclusions

Baseline EOS% >1.75% and camrelizumab without an anti-angiogenic agent were risk factors of RCCEP and might be associated with better survival in patients with NSCLC.

Efficacy and safety of second-line camrelizumab combined with apatinib and chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: A prospective, open-label, multicentric study

OBJECTIVES

Camrelizumab (a programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor) and apatinib (an angiogenesis inhibitor) are considered as potential treatments for advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line camrelizumab combined with apatinib and chemotherapy (albumin-bound paclitaxel, docetaxel, or pemetrexed) in patients with advanced LUAD.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with advanced LUAD underwent second-line camrelizumab combined with apatinib and chemotherapy were enrolled in this prospective, open-label, multicentric study. Follow-up with a median duration of 18.0 months was conducted.

RESULTS

There were 0 (0.0 %), 11 (37.9 %), 14 (48.4 %), and 3 (10.3 %) patients achieving complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. Meanwhile, treatment response was not evaluated in 1 (3.4 %) patient. The objective response and disease control rates were 37.9 % and 86.3 %, respectively. In terms of survival, the median (95 % confidence interval) progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.1 (5.2-17.0) months, with 1-year and 2-year PFS rates of 40.4 % and 20.5 %, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached; the 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 72.0 % and 64.8 %, respectively. Current treatment cycles ≥ 8 were associated with better PFS and OS (both P < 0.001). In addition, 21 (72.4 %) patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), which was mostly of grade I and II. The most commonly occurring TEAE was leukopenia (17.2 %), liver dysfunction (17.2 %), hypothyroidism (13.8 %), hand-foot syndrome (13.8 %), and thrombocytopenia (13.8 %).

CONCLUSION

Second-line camrelizumab combined apatinib and chemotherapy might serve as a potential treatment with acceptable safety in patients with advanced LUAD.

A pilot study of multi-antigen stimulated cell therapy-I plus camrelizumab and apatinib in patients with advanced bone and soft-tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Cell-based  immunotherapy shows the therapeutic potential in sarcomas, in addition to angiogenesis-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Multi-antigen stimulated cell therapy-I (MASCT-I) technology is a sequential immune cell therapy for cancer, which composes of multiple antigen-loaded dendritic cell (DC) vaccines followed by the adoptive transfer of anti-tumor effector T-cells.

METHODS

In this phase 1 study, we assessed MASCT-I plus camrelizumab (an ICI against PD-1) and apatinib (a highly selective TKI targeting VEGFR2) in patients with unresectable recurrent or metastatic bone and soft-tissue sarcoma after at least one line of prior systemic therapy. One MASCT-I course consisted of 3 DC subcutaneous injections, followed by 3 active T cell infusions administered 18-27 days after each DC injection. In schedule-I group, 3 DC injections were administered with a 28-day interval in all courses; in schedule-II group, 3 DC injections were administered with a 7-day interval in the first course and with a 28-day interval thereafter. All patients received intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks and oral apatinib 250 mg daily.

RESULTS

From October 30, 2019, to August 12, 2021, 19 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to schedule-I group (n = 9) and schedule-II group (n = 10). Of the 19 patients, 11 (57.9%) experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Patients in schedule-II group showed similar objective response rate (ORR) with those in schedule-I group (30.0% versus 33.3%) but had higher disease control rate (DCR; 90.0% versus 44.4%) and longer median progression-free survival (PFS; 7.7 versus 4.0 months). For the 13 patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, the ORR was 30.8%, DCR was 76.9%, and median PFS was 12.9 months; for the 6 patients with osteosarcomas, the ORR was 33.3%, the DCR was 50.0%, and median PFS was 5.7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, MASCT-I plus camrelizumab and apatinib was safe and showed encouraging efficacy in advanced bone and soft-tissue sarcoma, and schedule-II administration method was recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04074564.

A retrospective pilot study of transarterial chemoembolisation using camrelizumab-eluting Callisphere beads for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of initial hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolisation using camrelizumab-eluting Callisphere beads (camrelizumab-DEB-TACE) for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Enrolment included patients with unresectable HCC who underwent camrelizumab-DEB-TACE treatment from September 2021 to February 2023. The assessment included the examination of tumour response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the monitoring of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included in the study. The objective response rates (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were 55.0% and 90.0% at 1 month and 57.9% and 78.9% at 3 months, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 7.4 and 15.5 months months, respectively. Among the 21 patients, 4 underwent more than 2 procedures of camrelizumab-DEB-TACE, with a mean of 1.9 ± 1.1 procedures (range: 1-4) per patient. No severe complications or treatment-related mortalities were observed. In addition, no patient developed severe AEs related to camrelizumab, such as reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation, immune-related pneumonia, or immune-related myocarditis. Nineteen patients experienced at least one type of AEs related to DEB-TACE, with abdominal pain (n = 16, 76.2%) being the most prevalent AE.

CONCLUSION

Camrelizumab-DEB-TACE demonstrated effectiveness and safety as a treatment for unresectable HCC, with no occurrence of severe camrelizumab-related AEs.

Encephalitis in a patient with hypopharynx cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy: a case report and review of the literature

Hypopharyngeal cancer (HPC) has one of the most unfavorable prognoses among head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy, the same as conventional induction chemotherapy, has emerged as a vital part of the induction therapy protocol for HPC. Meanwhile, the incidence of immune-related adverse events is increasing. In this light, we present the first reported case of immune-associated encephalitis in a patient with hypopharyngeal cancer treated with Camrelizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor). After receiving immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy as induction therapy, along with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the patient presented with symptoms of fatigue, tremors, drowsiness, and an abnormal signal in the right temporal lobe as shown on a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Despite the minor elevation in protein and IgG index observed in the lumbar puncture, there is no evidence of abnormal autoantibodies or evidence of pathogenic infection. Following a thorough multidisciplinary consultation, the patient is suspected to be afflicted with immune-related autoimmune encephalitis. Intravenous methylprednisolone was prescribed as an empirical treatment at an initial dosage of 120 mg/day for 3 days, followed by steroid tapering. Finally, the patient experienced complete neurologic and radiographic (brain MRI) recovery. This case serves as a critical reminder that encephalitis is a potential diagnosis that should never be overlooked in patients undergoing immunotherapy who present with abnormal signs of the brain. The timely diagnosis and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy are key components of treating ICI-associated encephalitis.

Analysis and prediction of the efficacy and influencing factors of camrelizumab combined with TACE and sorafenib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

TACE combined with targeted therapy is a method for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. After adding camrelizumab, some patients had gained benefits, but some patients have produced serious adverse reactions. Therefore, more studies are needed to prove the efficacy and adverse reactions, and prediction models are needed to help with decision-making.

METHODS

With ethics committee approval, a bi-center retrospective study was finished. A total of 235 patients were enrolled and divided into the treatment group of camrelizumab combined with TACE and sorafenib and the treatment group of TACE and sorafenib. The survival rate, short-term efficacy and adverse reactions were compared, and the efficacy prediction model was established.

RESULTS

The 2-year survival time and objective response rate of the treatment group of camrelizumab combined with TACE plus sorafenib were higher than those of TACE plus sorafenib. Camrelizumab increased the proportion of reactive capillary proliferation, but had no effect on other adverse reactions. The established nomogram can accurately predict the response to the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Camrelizumab combined with TACE and sorafenib can improve the survival rate of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and it is an effective treatment. The nomogram model can predict the efficacy, which is beneficial for patients.

Hepatic cavernous hemangioma developed in non-small cell lung cancer patients after receiving Camrelizumab treatment: two case reports

Purpose

To report two cases of hepatic cavernous hemangioma, a rare complication, in patients with locally advanced and advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Additionally, to share clinical experiences related to the management of this condition.

Methods

Two patients with locally advanced and advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled in our hospital. Following the NCCN guidelines and expert consensus, both patients received standard treatment with Camrelizumab (PD-1 inhibitor). Subsequent abdominal CT scans revealed hepatic focal lesions that did not exhibit typical characteristics of metastatic tumors. Therefore, further systematic investigation was conducted to study the hepatic focal lesions.

Results

(1) Ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of hepatic cavernous hemangioma. A multidisciplinary consultation concluded that it was an adverse drug reaction to Camrelizumab. (2) Ten-gene testing for both patients did not reveal any driver gene mutations associated with lung cancer. Apart from the occurrence of hepatic cavernous hemangioma, there were no signs of disease progression or worsening. (3) Both patients had resolution of hepatic cavernous hemangioma after switching to alternative PD-1 inhibitors or discontinuing PD-1 inhibitor treatment. One patient experienced hemorrhage related to the hepatic hemangioma, which was managed with hemostasis and symptomatic treatment, resulting in improvement. (4) Clinical outcomes: The first patient achieved a progression-free survival (PFS) of 33 months in first-line treatment and had not reached the PFS endpoint in second-line treatment, with an overall survival exceeding 56 months. The second patient had not reached the PFS endpoint in first-line treatment, with an overall survival exceeding 31 months.

Conclusion

Hepatic cavernous hemangioma is a rare and serious adverse reaction associated with PD-1 inhibitors. Camrelizumab may interact with the PD-1 molecule in a different manner compared to other PD-1 inhibitors, affecting the regulation of the VEGFR/ULBP2 signaling pathway. In future studies, next-generation sequencing may provide detailed molecular pathology information, which could help explain individual differences and provide a basis for the prevention or intervention of hepatic cavernous hemangioma.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus apatinib with or without camrelizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The evidence of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor and immune checkpoint inhibitor in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was limited. This study aimed to evaluate the role of TACE plus apatinib (TACE + A) and TACE combined with apatinib plus camrelizumab (TACE + AC) in patients with unresectable HCC.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed patients with unresectable HCC who received TACE + A or TACE + AC in 20 centers of China from January 1, 2019 to June 31, 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) at 1:1 was performed to reduce bias. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 960 eligible patients with HCC were included in the final analysis. After PSM, there were 449 patients in each group, and the baseline characteristics were balanced between two groups. At data cutoff, the median follow-up time was 16.3 (range: 11.9-21.4) months. After PSM, the TACE + AC group showed longer median OS (24.5 vs 18.0 months, p < 0.001) and PFS (10.8 vs 7.7 months, p < 0.001) than the TACE + A group; the ORR (49.9% vs 42.5%, p = 0.002) and DCR (88.4% vs 84.0%, p = 0.003) of the TACE + AC group were also higher than those in the TACE + A group. Fever, pain, hypertension and hand-foot syndrome were the more common TRAEs in two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both TACE plus apatinib and TACE combined with apatinib plus camrelizumab were feasible in patients with unresectable HCC, with manageable safety profiles. Moreover, TACE combined with apatinib plus camrelizumab showed additional benefit.

Case Report: Successful treatment of advanced hepatocarcinoma with the PD-1 inhibitor Camrelizumab

Primary liver cancer is characterized by closely related with chronic liver inflammation, thereby reversing hypoxic immunosuppressive microenvironment of tumor cell growth by immunotherapy drug is a potentially effective strategy. Camrelizumab is an anti-PD-1 antibody being developed by Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. We reported a case of an adult critical Chinese patient with primary hepatocellular carcinoma and lung metastasis completely responding to Camrelizumab, most of the lesions were stable and no new lesions occurred after 1-year treatment, which provides us to reconsider the therapeutic effect of Camrelizumab on such patients. Camrelizumab had a safety profile for the patient in our case report, except for the occurrence of RCCEP. This case provides the evidence of the effective antitumor activity and manageable toxicities of Camrelizumab for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, which was the first application as far as we know.

Camrelizumab plus famitinib in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with PD-1 blockade: data from a multicohort phase 2 study

Background

Treatment options for patients with recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) are not clear after progression on previous treatment with PD-(L)1 inhibitor; critical gaps in evidence remain for such cases. Immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy has been reported to have synergistic antitumor activity. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus famitinib in patients with RM-NPC who failed treatment with PD-1 inhibitor-containing regimens.

Methods

This multicenter, adaptive Simon minimax two-stage, phase II study enrolled patients with RM-NPC refractory to at least one line of systemic platinum-containing chemotherapy and anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. The patient received camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks and famitinib 20 mg once per day. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the study could be stopped early as criterion for efficacy was met (>5 responses). Key secondary endpoints included time to response (TTR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), and safety. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04346381.

Findings

Between October 12, 2020, and December 6, 2021, a total of 18 patients were enrolled since six responses were observed. The ORR was 33.3% (90% CI, 15.6-55.4) and the DCR was 77.8% (90% CI, 56.1-92.0). The median TTR was 2.1 months, the median DoR was 4.2 months (90% CI, 3.0-not reach), and the median PFS was 7.2 months (90% CI, 4.4-13.3), with a median follow-up duration of 16.7 months. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade ≥3 were reported in eight (44.4%) patients, with the most common being decreased platelet count and/or neutropenia (n = 4, 22.2%). Treatment-related serious AEs occurred in six (33.3%) patients, and no deaths occurred due to TRAEs. Four patients developed grade ≥3 nasopharyngeal necrosis; two of them developed grade 3-4 major epistaxis, and they were cured by nasal packing and vascular embolization.

Interpretation

Camrelizumab plus famitinib exhibited encouraging efficacy and tolerable safety profiles in patients with RM-NPC who failed frontline immunotherapy. Further studies are needed to confirm and expand these findings.

Funding

Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Nasal alar metastasis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma misdiagnosed as reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation in a patient treated with camrelizumab and apatinib: a case report

Background

Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) is a common adverse event of camrelizumab in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Facial skin metastasis is an exceptionally uncommon occurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It can be easily mistaken for a prevalent complication known as RCCEP, particularly when it manifests as a persistently enlarging tumor-like mass. This case report highlights a prototypical instance where a metastasis in the nasal alar region of HCC was mistakenly diagnosed as RCCEP during immunotherapy. The findings of this report hold significant clinical value in guiding the management of larger RCCEP lesions encountered during immunotherapy.

Case Description

In this case, the patient is a male with a history of hepatitis B. In October 2015, he was diagnosed with HCC. In April 2020, he commenced treatment with ramucirumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) as tumor progression. However, during the third treatment cycle, the patient experienced RCCEP, predominantly affecting the head, neck, trunk, and limbs. To address this, sequential administration of apatinib was initiated, resulting in the gradual regression of RCCEP in these areas. Unfortunately, the metastatic lesion in the nasal alar region continued to grow, exhibiting a tumor-like appearance. On January 25, 2021, surgical resection was performed to remove the nasal alar lesion, and subsequent pathological examination confirmed it as a liver metastasis. Post-surgery, radiation therapy was administered to effectively manage the remaining lesion in the nasal alar region. Importantly, the treatment of the nasal alar metastasis did not hinder the comprehensive management of HCC. The patient obtained excellent curative effect.

Conclusions

During the course of immunotherapy for HCC, the emergence of a larger RCCEP lesion that does not show signs of regression even with vigorous treatment raises the suspicion of skin metastasis. It is difficult to distinguish metastatic tumor on the skin from morule- and tumor-like RCCEP that does not easily resolve. To obtain a definitive diagnosis, an early pathological biopsy is crucial. If confirmed as a metastatic tumor, prompt consideration should be given to implementing curative surgical resection.

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy is recommended to improve the prognosis of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). As a PD-1 inhibitor developed in China, camrelizumab is more accessible and available for Chinese ESCC patients. Camrelizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy has shown promising efficacy with acceptable toxicity for resectable ESCC in the NIC-ESCC2019 trial. However, this was a single-arm trial, so we conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in terms of the safety and efficacy in patients with locally advanced ESCC.

METHODS

Between January 2017 and December 2021, patients with stage II-IVa ESCC who received neoadjuvant therapy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and underwent radical oesophagectomy were enrolled in our study. These included 19 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus camrelizumab (group 1) and 40 patients who only received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (group 2).

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the patients were comparable between the two groups. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 (26.3% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.018). All patients in group 1 achieved complete resection (R0), compared with 39 (97.5%) patients in group 2. Adverse events occurred in 16 (84%) patients in group 1 versus 35 (87.5%) patients in group 2. No grade ≥ 4 adverse events occurred in either group. No significant difference was found in surgical outcomes or postoperative complications. The 90-day mortality rate was comparable between the two groups (1 patient died in group 1 versus 2 patients in group 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy followed by surgery was associated with a promising pCR rate and a manageable safety profile for patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Reactive Cutaneous Capillary Endothelial Proliferation Caused by Camrelizumab: Sixteen Case Reports

To investigate the regularity and characteristics of adverse drug reaction (ADR) of reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation caused by Camrelizumab, so as to provide reference for clinical rational use of drugs. Searching for case reports of Camrelizumab-induced reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) in databases such as China Biology Medicine disc, VIP Database, CNKI, Wanfang Medical, PubMed, Wiley online library, Embase with "Carritzumab/Ericab," "SHR-1210," "Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation," "Reactive capillary hemangiomas," and "Capillary proliferation" as search terms. The retrieval time is from the establishment of the database to February 2022. After eliminating clinical trials and incomplete literature, information of patients included in the literature was analyzed, which included gender, age, reason for medication, usage and dosage, time of ADR, concomitant medication, clinical manifestations, intervention measures, outcomes of patients, etc. A total of 11 articles involving 16 patients were included, including 11 males and five females, with an average age of 60.5 years. Reasons for medication included nine cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), four cases of liver cancer, one case of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), one case of synovial sarcoma, and one case of Hodgkin lymphoma. Thirteen patients recorded in detail that the dosage of Camrelizumab was 200 mg, and the frequency of medication was q2w~q4w. Eight patients were treated with Camrelizumab alone, and eight patients were treated with combined medication. RCCEP occurred in nine patients after the first medication, and in seven patients after two-four cycles of medication, the average medication cycle was two cycles, and the average occurrence time was 12.5 days after the last medication. The main clinical manifestations were that several different sizes of growths such as red nevus-like, pearl-like, and mulberry-like growths appear on the head, face, neck, torso, limbs, and other parts of the body, all of which were grade 1-2. The RCCEP of all patients was controlled after treatment. During the treatment, 11 patients were stable and five patients were local remission. RCCEP is caused by Camrelizumabis a special skin immune response, which will not cause life-threatening to patients. However, clinicians and pharmacists should be familiar with the characteristics and regularities of the adverse reaction, to do a good job in medication monitoring and management, as for ensuring the safety of patients with medication.

Immunotherapy with or without targeted therapy for metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma: case report and literature review

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been proved having a better safety profile compared to platinum-based chemotherapy and have demonstrated encouraging anti-tumor therapeutic effects for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of ICIs in patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (mUTUC).

Case reports

Case 1 was a 71-year-old male patient diagnosed with left renal pelvic carcinoma, accompanied by a metastasis to the second lumbar spine. As the patient became refractory to chemotherapy, four cycles of camrelizumab, one of the ICIs, were administered, which helped to control the metastases and extend the patient's progression-free survival to five months. Case 2 was an 88-year-old female with middle and lower right ureter carcinoma with right iliac arteriovenous invasion. The patient received five cycles of camrelizumab plus vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) inhibitors and achieved stable disease.

Conclusion

For patients who are ineligible for chemotherapy, immunotherapy might be a feasible treatment, regardless of whether or not they are given VEGFR2 inhibitors.

Camrelizumab for cancers in patients living with HIV: one-single center experience

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of the anti-PD-1 antibody camrelizumab in people living with HIV (PLWH); the secondary objective was to evaluate tumor response.

METHODS

From May 8, 2018, to December 10, 2021, twenty-four patients with HIV and advanced cancer as well as a CD4⁺ T-cell count greater than or equal to 100 cells/µL were treated with camrelizumab in daily practice. We describe the demographic characteristics, safety, and clinical course of these 24 PLWH with cancer treated with camrelizumab. Safety was assessed using the current Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The tumor response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1).

RESULTS

The median number of cycles was 8 (4-26). Only two grade 3 adverse reactions were reported (no toxic deaths or immune-related deaths). Among the 24 patients, 2 (8%) complete responses and 6 (25%) partial responses were observed. 7 patients (29%) were at stable tumor status and others progressed.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the present study strongly support the use of camrelizumab (monoclonal antibodies targeting the PD-1 pathway) in this population, as it appears to be a feasible approach with no deleterious effects on PLWH and tolerability and acceptable efficacy. In addition, these findings further support the inclusion of PLWH with cancer in clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of ICIs on cancer.

Neoadjuvant Camrelizumab for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter, Real-World Study (CTONG2004)

BACKGROUND

Camrelizumab has shown encouraging efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), either as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy. However, evidence of neoadjuvant camrelizumab for NSCLC remains lacking.

METHODS

Patients with NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant camrelizumab-based therapy followed by surgery between December 2020 and September 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and clinical data, details of neoadjuvant therapy and surgical information were retrieved.

RESULTS

In this multicenter retrospective real-world study, 96 patients were included. Ninety-five patients (99.0%) received neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy, with a median of 2 cycles (range 1-6). The median interval from the last dose to surgery was 33 days (range 13-102 days). Seventy patients (72.9%) underwent minimally invasive surgery. Lobectomy was the most frequent surgical procedure (94 [97.9%]). The median estimated intraoperative blood loss was 100 mL (range 5-1200 mL), and the median operative time was 3.0 h (range 1.5-6.5 h). The R0 resection rate was 93.8%. Twenty-one patients (21.9%) experienced postoperative complications, with the most common being cough and pain (both 6 [6.3%]). The overall response rate was 77.1% (95% CI 67.4-85.0%), and the disease control rate was 93.8% (95% CI 86.9-97.7%). Twenty-six patients (27.1%, 95% CI 18.5-37.1%) had pathological complete response. Neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were reported in seven patients (7.3%), with the most frequent being abnormal liver enzymes (two [2.1%]). No treatment-related deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

The real-world data indicated that camrelizumab-based therapy had promising efficacy for NSCLC in the neoadjuvant setting, with manageable toxicities. Prospective studies investigating neoadjuvant camrelizumab are warranted.

Effectiveness and tolerability of camrelizumab combined with molecular targeted therapy for patients with unresectable or advanced HCC

There is a lack of effective programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-targeted immunotherapy with good tolerability in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and severely compromised liver function. We assessed patient outcomes after combined camrelizumab and molecular targeted therapy in a multicenter cohort study in China. The study included 99 patients with advanced HCC (58 Child-Pugh A and 41 Child-Pugh B), 84 of them received camrelizumab combined with molecular targeted therapy from January 10, 2019, to March 31, 2021. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. The median follow-up was 12.1 months. For patients with Child-Pugh B, the OS probability at 12-months, ORR and DCR were 49.7%, 31.7% and 65.9%, respectively, and the median PFS was 5.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0-7.1], which were comparable with Child-Pugh A patients, although median OS was shorter in Child-Pugh B patients (20.5 vs.13.4 months, P = 0.12). In multivariate analysis, macrovascular infiltration (MVI), but not sex, age, hepatitis B virus etiology, extrahepatic metastasis, Child-Pugh B, or AFP > 400 ng/ml, was associated with 12-months OS [hazard ratio (HR) 2.970, 95% CI 1.276-6.917, P = 0.012] and ORR (HR 2.906, 95% CI 1.18-7.16, P = 0.020). Grade 3/4 immune-related AEs occurred in 26.8% of Child-Pugh B patients, including one potentially treatment-related death. In both groups, the most common AEs were immune thrombocytopenia and hepatotoxicity. Camrelizumab combined with targeted therapy showed favorable effectiveness and tolerability with manageable toxicities in Chinese HCC patients, regardless of Child-Pugh A/B liver function. MVI was associated with suboptimal immunotherapy response and poor prognosis.

A new prognostic model for predicting outcomes of patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving subsequent line (≥2 lines) anti-programmed death-1 monotherapy

OBJECTIVES

About 17.7-34.0 % of patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) responded well to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. We sought to establish a nomogram to estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) of RM-NPC patients receiving subsequent-line anti-PD-1 monotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cohort study investigated consecutive RM-NPC patients undergoing anti-PD-1 monotherapy. A nomogram was developed in the training cohort (n = 161), using a Cox multivariate model with backward stepwise inclusion, and was validated in the validation cohort (n = 69). Its predictive accuracy was assessed using a concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Liver metastasis, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, and plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA were used to develop a nomogram that could separate patients into favourable- and unfavourable-prognosis groups. The C-index in the training and validation cohort were 0.70 and 0.68, respectively, which was confirmed by calibration curves. Median PFS (mPFS) was lower for the unfavourable-prognosis than for the favourable-prognosis group (1.80 vs 4.93; hazard ratio 2.49 [95 % confidence interval: 1.78-3.49]; p < 0.001), across all subgroups. OS exhibited the same pattern. The ORR and DCR were markedly lower in the unfavourable-prognosis than in the favourable-prognosis group. All results were confirmed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

Our model is a reliable prognostic indicator of PFS in RM-NPC patients undergoing anti-PD-1 monotherapy, allowing robust estimation of the immunotherapy benefit an individual might derive.

Efficacy, Safety, and Health-Related Quality of Life With Camrelizumab Plus Pemetrexed and Carboplatin as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC With Brain Metastases (CAP-BRAIN): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase 2 Study

INTRODUCTION

Systemic treatment options for NSCLC with brain metastases (BMs) are scarce. We evaluated the activity and safety of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with BMs.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial (NCT04211090) conducted at seven hospitals in China. Eligible patients had treatment-naive metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC and BMs that were asymptomatic or symptoms controlled with dehydration therapy and no previous systemic treatment or local therapy for the target brain lesion. Patients received camrelizumab (200 mg) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) and carboplatin (area under the curve 5) intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for four cycles, followed by maintenance with camrelizumab (200 mg) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary end point was confirmed intracranial objective response rate according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, which was primarily analyzed in the efficacy analysis set (EAS).

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients were enrolled and treated (full analysis set), with 40 patients having at least one post-baseline tumor assessment (EAS). As of August 30, 2022, median follow-up duration was 12.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.2-17.3). The confirmed intracranial objective response rate was 52.5% (95% CI: 36.1-68.5) in EAS and 46.7% (95% CI: 31.7-62.1) in full analysis set. The extracranial objective response rate was 47.5% (95% CI: 31.5-63.9) and 42.2% (95% CI: 27.7-57.8), respectively. Median intracranial progression-free survival was 7.6 months (95% CI: 4.6-not reached [NR]), median overall progression-free survival was 7.4 months (95% CI: 4.4-NR), and median overall survival was 21.0 months (95% CI: 15.9-NR). The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher were neutrophil count decrease (six [13.3%]) and anemia (four [8.9%]). One treatment-related death occurred owing to immune-related pneumonia. Linear mixed-effects model displayed that a positive trend for improvement in cognitive function and quality of life was observed based on Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung scores (p = 0.025, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Camrelizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin was found to have an activity with manageable toxicity and to improve cognitive function and quality of life for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC with BMs in the first-line setting.

Conversion surgery for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after combination treatment of lenvatinib and camrelizumab: a case report

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive malignancy with high morbidity and mortality. Conversion therapy can improve surgical resection rate and prolong survival time for patients with advanced HCC. We show that combination therapy with lenvatinib and camrelizumab is a novel approach to downstage unresectable HCC.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 49-year-old man was diagnosed with massive HCC with hilar lymph node and lung metastases. Since radical resection was not feasible, lenvatinib and camrelizumab were administered as first-line therapy. After 10 cycles of camrelizumab and continuous oral administration of lenvatinib, the tumor exhibited striking shrinkage in volume indicating a partial radiological response, accompanied by a reduction in the alpha-fetoprotein levels, followed by salvage resection. Intriguingly, an improvement in predictive biomarkers, like lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), was observed. Notably, the pathological examination found high levels of necrosis in the resected tumor, and flow cytometry analysis indicated a significant increase in the ratio of CD5+ and CD5- B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood. After the treatment, the overall survival period was over 24 months, and no recurrence was observed 17-month post-surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of lenvatinib and camrelizumab may be a new conversion therapy for initially unresectable HCC to resectable HCC, thus contributing to improve the disease prognosis. In addition, the combination regimen could cause an activated immune response, and LDH, NLR, and CD5+ B-cell levels might be predictors for immunotherapy efficacy.

Camrelizumab Plus Carboplatin and Pemetrexed as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC: Extended Follow-Up of CameL Phase 3 Trial

INTRODUCTION

In CameL phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03134872), addition of camrelizumab to first-line chemotherapy significantly improved the progression-free survival in patients with stages IIIB to IV nonsquamous NSCLC. Here, we present outcomes after a minimum follow-up of 43.9 months since last patient randomization.

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to 4 to 6 cycles of camrelizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed or chemotherapy alone every 3 weeks, followed by maintenance camrelizumab plus pemetrexed or pemetrexed only (n = 205 and 207, respectively). Total camrelizumab exposure was up to 2 years.

RESULTS

As of January 31, 2022, camrelizumab plus chemotherapy exhibited substantially improved overall survival over chemotherapy alone (median, 27.1 versus 19.8 mo; hazard ratio = 0.72 [95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.92]). In the chemotherapy-alone group, 95 patients (45.9%) crossed over to camrelizumab monotherapy. After adjustment for crossover, the survival benefit with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy was more pronounced (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.55 [95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.71]). In camrelizumab plus chemotherapy group, 33 patients completed 2 years of camrelizumab. Objective response rate was 97.0%, with ongoing responses in 17 of the 32 responses (53.1%), and 93.9% (31 of 33) of the patients were alive at data cutoff. Safety profiles were consistent with the previous report, and no obvious evidence of cumulative toxicity was found with long exposure to camrelizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Camrelizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed provides long-term survival benefit over chemotherapy, with manageable toxicity and remarkable and durable response in patients receiving 2 years of camrelizumab, further supporting camrelizumab combination as first-line treatment for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.

Efficacy and safety of Camrelizumab combined with Abraxane + lobaplatin regimen for advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To examine the safety and effectiveness of the combination of Camrelizumab and Abraxane + lobaplatin in advanced gastric cancer therapy.

METHODS

The data of 60 patients with advanced gastric cancer in Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital from May 2017 to March 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into a study group (n=30) and a control group (n=30) according to different treatment methods. The study group received Camrelizumab combined with the Abraxane + lobaplatin regimen, and the control group received the Abraxane + lobaplatin regimen only. The levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R), secretory glycoprotein (Dickkopf-1, DKK-1) and tumor specific growth factors (TSGFs), the relative molecular expression of serum miRNA-1290, miRNA-647 and miRNA-182, and the Karnofsky performance status (KPS) were compared between the two groups. The adverse reactions of the two groups were observed, and the 3-year survival rates were compared.

RESULTS

The disease control rate and overall remission rate of the study group (53.33%, 90.00%) were higher than those of the control group (26.67%, 50.00%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The levels of sLL-2R, DKK-1 and TSGF were reduced in both groups (P<0.05) after being treated, whereas these were comparatively lower levels in the study group (P<0.05). After treatment, serum concentration of miRNA-1290, miRNA-647 and miRNA-182 were lower in the study group than in the control group (P<0.05). Upon comparison with those in the control group, the KPS scores were higher at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment in the study group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates were higher in the study group (57.38%, 39.34% and 29.51%) than in the control group (32.79%, 18.03% and 8.20%) (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of Camrelizumab and Abraxane + lobaplatin is an effective treatment for advanced gastric cancer and can increase the patient's survival rate.

Vedolizumab in the treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis: Two case reports

BACKGROUND

Immune check-point inhibitors-induced colitis (ICPIs-induced colitis) is one of the immune-related side effects. Steroids and Infliximab are commonly used to treat it. The patients of our report were treated by Vedolizumab.

CASE SUMMARY

The two patients went to the doctor with bloody stools and were treated by Sintilimab and Camrelizumab, respectively, for their malignant tumors. They were diagnosed as ICPIs-induced colitis based on endoscopic and histologic examination. The original immunotherapy was ceased while the anti-inflammatory therapy was introduced. The patients' colitis symptoms disappeared after the treatment and no recurrence was found during the follow-up period. The unique feature about the case reports is that Vedolizumab combined with short-term corticosteroids had achieved good therapeutic effects.

CONCLUSION

For the symptoms of bloody diarrhea after the ICPIs treatment of cancer, the possibility of ICPIs-induced colitis should be considered. Vedolizumab combined with short-term corticosteroids may be appropriate for the treatment.

A phase Ib study of camrelizumab in combination with apatinib and fuzuloparib in patients with recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Strategies to improve activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are needed. Preclinical studies showed that antiangiogenic agents and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors might sensitize tumors to immunotherapy. Here, we investigated the tolerability, safety, and preliminary antitumor activity of camrelizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in combination with apatinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor, and fuzuloparib, a PARP inhibitor, in patients with recurrent or metastatic TNBC.

METHODS

This phase Ib study included a dose-finding part and a dose-expansion part. In the dose-finding part, a 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme was introduced. Patients were given camrelizumab (200 mg every 2 weeks) plus apatinib (375 mg or 500 mg once daily) and fuzuloparib (starting dose 100 mg twice daily) every 28-day cycle. After evaluation of the tolerability and safety of the dosing regimens, a clinical recommended dose was determined for the dose-expansion part. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT).

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients were enrolled. Three patients received camrelizumab 200 mg + apatinib 375 mg + fuzuloparib 100 mg, and 29 received camrelizumab 200 mg + apatinib 500 mg + fuzuloparib 100 mg (clinical recommended dose). No DLTs were observed in either group. The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were decreased white blood cell count (20.7%), hypertension (13.8%), decreased neutrophil count (10.3%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (10.3%). Two patients discontinued study treatment due to immune-mediated hepatitis (n = 1) and anemia, decreased platelet count, decreased white blood cell count, increased alanine aminotransferase, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and increased γ-glutamyltransferase (n = 1). One patient died of unknown cause. Two (6.9% [95% CI, 0.9-22.8]) of 29 patients with camrelizumab 200 mg + apatinib 500 mg + fuzuloparib 100 mg had objective response. The disease control rate was 62.1% (95% CI, 42.3-79.3). The median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% CI, 3.6-7.3), and the 12-month overall survival rate was 64.2% (95% CI, 19.0-88.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of camrelizumab plus apatinib and fuzuloparib showed manageable safety profile and preliminary antitumor activity in patients with recurrent or metastatic TNBC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03945604 (May 10, 2019).

Treatment response, survival, and safety profile of camrelizumab plus apatinib regimen as third-line treatment in metastatic gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Camrelizumab, as a PD-1 inhibitor on the market recently, presents favorable therapeutic efficacy in several advanced cancers, while its application in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) lacks data. This study aimed to assess treatment response, survival profile, and adverse events of camrelizumab plus apatinib regimen as third-line treatment in mGC patients.

METHODS

Nineteen mGC patients who received camrelizumab plus apatinib as third-line treatment were analyzed in this observational study. Subsequently, treatment response and adverse events were documented, then progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated.

RESULTS

No (0.0%) patient achieved complete response; 5 (26.3%) patients achieved partial response; 8 (42.1%) patients had stable disease; 6 (31.6%) patients had progressive disease, resulting in objective response rate and disease control rate of 26.3% and 68.4%, respectively. Meanwhile, the median PFS and OS were 7.0 (95%CI: 2.9-11.0) months and 10.0 (95%CI: 7.4-12.6) months, accordingly. Besides, multiple metastases linked with worse PFS (P = 0.029) and OS (P = 0.021); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score 1 (vs. 0) related to shorter OS (P = 0.030). Worth noting, the common adverse events were fatigue (42.1%), anemia (42.1%), neutropenia (42.1%), leukopenia (36.8%), pruritus (31.6%), proteinuria (31.6%), nausea and vomiting (31.6%), reactive capillary hemangioma (31.6%) and thrombocytopenia (31.6%). Meanwhile, grade 3-4 adverse events only included: thrombocytopenia (5.3%), hypertension (5.3%), and proteinuria (5.3%).

CONCLUSION

Camrelizumab plus apatinib as third-line treatment achieves satisfactory therapeutic efficacy and survival profile with generally manageable adverse events in mGC patients.

Combining stereotactic body radiotherapy with camrelizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-arm trial

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may have significant immunomodulatory effects that enhance tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. This phase 2 clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining palliative SBRT with camrelizumab (an anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

METHODS

Patients with uHCC, Child-Pugh A/B liver function, and at least one measurable lesion were enrolled between April 2020 and August 2022. Patients were administered 200 mg camrelizumab intravenously from the first day of palliative SBRT and then every 3 weeks. Palliative SBRT was delivered daily over five fractions per week, with a dose range of 30-50 Gy. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04193696).

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled; the median radiation dose was 40 Gy, and the median number of cycles of camrelizumab was five. The ORR was 52.4%. After a median follow-up of 19.7 months, the median progression-free and overall survival were 5.8 and 14.2 months, respectively. The overall survival probability was 85.7% at 6 months, 76.2% at 9 months, and 59.9% at 12 months. All grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in five patients (23.8%) and were manageable. No grade 4/5 TRAEs were observed.

CONCLUSION

Palliative SBRT plus camrelizumab showed promising antitumor activity against uHCC. Toxicities were manageable with no unexpected safety issues. This study provides evidence of a new therapeutic method for the treatment of uHCC.

Camrelizumab-induced anaphylactic shock in an esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patient: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Camrelizumab (SHR-1210), an immune checkpoint inhibitor, is clinically used as a therapeutic option for various types of tumors. However, reports of adverse reactions associated with camrelizumab are gradually increasing. Anaphylactic shock due to camrelizumab has not been reported previously, until now. We report here, for the first time, a case of anaphylactic shock associated with camrelizumab in a patient with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

CASE SUMMARY

An 84-year-old male esophageal cancer patient received radiotherapy and chemotherapy 11 years ago. He was diagnosed with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with liver metastasis (TxN1M1) and received the first immunotherapy (camrelizumab 200 mg/each time, once every 3 wk) dose in December 2020, with no adverse reactions. Three weeks later, a generalized rash was noted on the chest and upper limbs; palpitations and breathing difficulties with a sense of dying occurred 10 min after the patient had been administered with the second camrelizumab therapy. Electrocardiograph monitoring revealed a 70 beats/min pulse rate, 69/24 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) blood pressure, 28 breaths/min respiratory rate, and 86% pulse oximetry in room air. The patient was diagnosed with anaphylactic shock and was managed with intravenous fluid, adrenaline, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, calcium glucosate, and noradrenaline. Approximately 2 h after treatment, the patient’s anaphylactic shock symptoms had been completely relieved.

CONCLUSION

Due to the widespread use of camrelizumab, attention should be paid to anti-programmed cell death 1 antibody therapy-associated hypersensitivity or anaphylactic shock.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib in previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR or ALK genetic aberration

Background

Camrelizumab plus apatinib shows encouraging antitumor activity and acceptable toxicity in chemotherapy-pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, clinical benefits from this combination regimen in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements (EGFR+/ALK+) have not been reported. We assessed the efficacy and safety of this combined regimen in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC and defined EGFR/ALK status (EGFR+/ALK+) in a phase 1b/2 trial.

Methods

Previously treated patients with advanced EGFR+/ALK+ NSCLC were enrolled and given camrelizumab 200 mg intravenously every 2 weeks plus apatinib at the recommended dose of 250 mg orally once daily. Patients harboring sensitive EGFR mutations or ALK fusion genes had received at least one EGFR/ALK TKI and a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen before the enrollment. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).

Results

All 43 enrolled patients comprised the efficacy and safety analysis population. The confirmed ORR was 18.6% (95% CI: 8.4–33.4%) and the clinical benefit response rate was 27.9% (95% CI: 15.3–43.7%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.8 months (95% CI: 1.9–5.5 months) and median overall survival was not reached (95% CI: 7.3 months–not reached), with a median follow-up period of 15.7 months (range, 0.5–24.4 months). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hypertension (16.3%), proteinuria (11.6%) and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (9.3%). No unexpected adverse events were recorded.

Conclusions

Camrelizumab plus apatinib showed moderate antitumor activity and acceptable safety profile in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC and EGFR or ALK genetic aberrations, which warranted further validation.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03083041. Registered March 17, 2017.

Safety, activity, and pharmacokinetics of camrelizumab in advanced Asian melanoma patients: a phase I study

Background

Anti-programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) monotherapy is the standard treatment for metastatic melanoma in current. Camrelizumab is a humanized IgG4 anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody whose safety and efficacy have not been reported in advanced Asian melanoma patients.

Methods

This phase I study investigated the safety, activity, and pharmacokinetics of camrelizumab in Chinese patients with advanced melanoma. The study included two phases, the dose-escalation phase (“3 + 3” design at 60 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg) and the dose-expansion phase.

Results

No dose-limiting toxicities were recorded over the dose-escalation phase, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in 36 patients were reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation, followed by rash, fever, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, vitiligo, and fatigue. Five grade 3 or above TRAEs were reported (13.9%), including two cases of elevated γ-glutamyltransferase and blood triglycerides without clinical symptoms, and one liver injury recovered after symptomatic treatment. The confirmed overall response rate was 13.9% (95%CI: 4.7, 29.5%) and disease control rate was 38.9% (95%CI: 23.1, 56.5%). The median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95%CI: 1.1, 2.4) and the median overall survival was 11.1 months (95%CI: 6.8, 15.4).

Conclusions

Camrelizumab had acceptable tolerability and similar anti-tumor activity compared with other anti-PD-1 antibodies in advanced Asian melanoma patients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identification: NCT02738489. Registered on 14/04/2016, prospectively registered.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09663-5.

Three-arm phase II trial comparing camrelizumab plus chemotherapy versus camrelizumab plus chemoradiation versus chemoradiation as preoperative treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (NICE-2 Study)

Background

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with CROSS regimen has been the recommended treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The addition of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor to preoperative CRT may further improve oncologic results. Preoperative camrelizumab plus chemotherapy has been demonstrated as a promising treatment modality based on results of the phase II NICE study (ChiCTR1900026240).

Methods

The NICE-2 study is designed as a three-arm, multicenter, prospective, randomized, phase II clinical trial, comparing camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (IO-CT) and camrelizumab plus CRT (IO-CRT) versus CRT as preoperative treatment for locally advanced ESCC. A total of 204 patients will be recruited from 8 Chinese institutions within 1.5 years. The primary endpoint is pathological complete response (pCR) rate and secondary endpoints include event-free survival (EFS), R0 resection rate, and adverse events.

Discussion

This is the first prospective randomized controlled trial to explore commonly used neoadjuvant treatments in clinical practice, which will provide high-level evidence of neoadjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced ESCC. The purpose of this study is to establish the optimal modality of IO-CT, IO-CRT and CRT as preoperative treatment for locally advanced ESCC. The Institution Review Committee approved this study protocol in August 2021 and patient enrollment was started in September 2021.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT05043688 (August 29, 2021). The trial was prospectively registered.

Effect of camrelizumab plus transarterial chemoembolization on massive hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of camrelizumab plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) on massive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

A total of 92 cases with massive HCC from October 2019 to January 2021 were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into the study group (n = 46) and the control group (n = 46). The control group received TACE while the study group were treated with camrelizumab plus TACE. The primary end points were clinical efficacy and adverse events. And the secondary end points were liver function, and alpha fetoprotein (AFP), carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels before and after treatment.

RESULTS

All participants were followed-up for 7 to 24 months, with a median of 12 months. Patients in the study group received TACE for 1-3 times, with an average of (2.01 ± 0.09) times, while patients in the control group receive TACE for 2-4 times, with an average of (3.78 ± 0.12) times, and the control group received significantly more TACEs (χ² = 5.518, P = 0.019). During the follow-up, the response rate and disease control rate of the study group were significantly higher than those of the control group (χ² = 5.518, P = 0.019; χ² = 4.467, P = 0.041). Before treatment, the levels of total bilirubin (TBIL), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), CEA, and CA19-9 were comparable between the groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, the levels of TBIL, ALT, AST, AFP, CEA, and CA19-9 decreased, and the above indicators in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). All patients showed transient liver damage, vomiting, nausea, fever and abdominal pain after surgery, and their symptoms were relieved after symptomatic treatment. Adverse events occurred in 9 cases in the study group, and 3 cases in the control group (χ² = 3.419, P = 0.064).

CONCLUSION

Compared with TACE alone, camrelizumab plus TACE treatment can significantly improve the liver function of patients with massive HCC and enhance the treatment effect, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Camrelizumab combined with apatinib and S-1 as second-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a phase 2, single-arm, prospective study

BACKGROUND

The current second-line treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma remains unsatisfactory. Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody combined with anti-angiogenic therapy shows anti-tumor activity and synergistic effect. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of camrelizumab, apatinib, and S-1 in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial, in each 21-day cycle, eligible patients received 200 mg intravenous camrelizumab in the first day, 500 mg oral apatinib once daily continuously, and specific dose oral S-1 in the first 14 days until the trial was discontinued disease progression, development of intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. The secondary endpoints were disease control rate, progression-free survival and overall survival, and safety. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04345783.

RESULTS

Between May 2019 and August 2020, we enrolled a total of 24 patients in this trial. At the data cutoff (December 1, 2020), the median follow-up duration was 8.13 months. Seven of 24 (29.2%, 95%CI 14.9-49.2%) patients reached objective response. The median-progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95%CI 6.01-6.99) and the median overall survival was not reached. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 6 (25.0%) patients, including elevated transaminase, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, proteinuria, and intestinal obstruction. No serious treatment-related adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial, the combination of camrelizumab, apatinib, and S-1 showed promising anti-tumor activity and manageable toxicity as a second-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, regardless of PD-L1 expression.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04345783.

Successful response to camrelizumab in metastatic bladder cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

There has been no report to use camrelizumab with chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer patients with positive programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and high tumor mutational burden (TMB). More effective predictors of bladder cancer immunotherapy have yet to be explored, and the combination of multiple factors may be more predictive than a single factor.

CASE SUMMARY

We report the case of a 74-year-old male patient with recurrent metastatic bladder cancer, which demonstrated positive PD-L1 expression and high TMB. The immune checkpoint inhibitor camrelizumab was administered to the patient in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin. The patient achieved a partial response with a progression-free survival of 11 mo.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report to use camrelizumab with chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer patients with positive PD-L1 expression and high TMB.

Camrelizumab: an investigational agent for hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Although many approaches have been used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the clinical benefits were limited, particularly for advanced HCC. However, recent treatments with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy and its combination with other therapies, have demonstrated remarkable results. Camrelizumab, a selective, humanized, high-affinity IgG4 PD-1 monoclonal antibody, has been approved as a second-line treatment in patients with advanced HCC by NMPA in China.

AREAS COVERED

This paper introduces anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies for advanced HCC and progresses to discuss the pharmacology, safety, and efficacy of camrelizumab in the treatment of advanced HCC. It also considers future research directions for camrelizumab in this setting.

EXPERT OPINION

The PD-1 binding epitope of camrelizumab is different from other PD-1 inhibitors. The IC₅₀ and EC₅₀ of camrelizumab for inhibiting the binding of PD-1 and PD-L1 is similar to pembrolizumab, is significantly lower than other PD-1 inhibitors, and has a higher affinity for PD-1 site. Camrelizumab exhibits a promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile similar to other PD-1 inhibitors in advanced HCC. Apatinib (a VEGFR-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor) can reduce the incidence of camrelizumab-specific reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP).

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy in treating locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a pilot study

Background

Camrelizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) has been used as a potential therapy in unresectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) along with adjuvant treatment in locally advanced ESCC, exhibiting an acceptable efficacy and safety profile. This pilot study was designed to further investigate the clinical value and tolerance of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced ESCC.

Methods

A total of 16 patients with locally advanced ESCC were recruited. Patients received 2 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy including 2 doses of camrelizumab concurrent with 2 cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin followed by surgery 4 weeks afterward. Then, the treatment response after neoadjuvant therapy, R0 resection rate, tumor regression grade (TRG), and pathological complete remission (pCR) rate were measured. Besides, adverse events were documented. At last, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

Results

Generally, objective remission rate (ORR) was 81.3% whereas disease control rate (DCR) was 100% after neoadjuvant therapy. Concerning TRG grade, 31.3, 37.5, 18.8, and 12.5% patients reached TRG0, TRG1, TRG2, and TRG3, respectively. Then, pCR rate and R0 resection rate were 31.3 and 93.8%, respectively. Besides, mean PFS and OS were 18.3 months (95%CI: (16.2–20.5) months) and 19.2 months (95%CI: (17.7–20.7) months), respectively, with a 1-year PFS of 83% and OS of 90.9%. Adverse events included white blood cell decrease (37.5%), neutrophil decrease (31.3%), reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (37.5%), and nausea or vomiting (25.0%), which were relatively mild and manageable.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy exhibits good efficacy and acceptable tolerance in patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Camrelizumab in different PD-L1 expression cohorts of pre-treated advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

This phase II study evaluated camrelizumab in different PD-L1 expression cohorts of patients with previously treated advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; NCT03085069, registered March 21, 2017).

METHODS

Patients who progressed during/after chemotherapy were enrolled and divided into four cohorts based on PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS). Patients with EGFR/ALK alterations and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% were also eligible. All enrolled patients received camrelizumab at 200 mg IV Q2W. The primary endpoint was objective response rate.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients were enrolled. As of data cutoff on Aug 20, 2020, the median follow-up was 29.5 months (95% CI 27.4-30.8). Objective response rate was 17.8% (95% CI 12.0-25.0) and improved with the increasing PD-L1 TPS (TPS < 1%, 12.2% [95% CI 5.7-21.8]; ≥ 1-< 25%, 19.4% [95% CI 7.5-37.5]; ≥ 25-< 50%, 36.4% [95% CI 10.9-69.2]; ≥ 50%, 23.3% [95% CI 9.9-42.3]). No response was observed in the five patients harboring EGFR mutations. Median progression-free survival was 3.2 months (95% CI 2.0-3.4), and patients with positive PD-L1 TPS had longer progression-free survival. Median overall survival was 14.8 months (95% CI 10.2-18.7). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 87.7% of patients, and 21.2% had grade ≥ 3 TRAEs.

CONCLUSION

Camrelizumab showed improved efficacy compared with historical data of the second-line chemotherapy in pre-treated advanced/metastatic NSCLC. Patients with positive PD-L1 expression derived greater benefit from camrelizumab. Camrelizumab has a manageable safety profile.