1
|
Varanasi AP, Burhansstipanov L, Dorn C, Gentry S, Capossela MA, Fox K, Wilson D, Tanjasiri S, Odumosu O, Saavedra Ferrer EL. Patient navigation job roles by levels of experience: Workforce Development Task Group, National Navigation Roundtable. Cancer 2024; 130:1549-1567. [PMID: 38306297 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Cancer patient navigators work in diverse settings ranging from community-based programs to comprehensive cancer centers to improve outcomes in underserved populations by eliminating barriers to timely cancer prevention, early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship in a culturally appropriate and competent manner. This article clarifies the roles and responsibilities of Entry, Intermediate, and Advanced level cancer patient navigators. The competencies described in this article apply to patient navigators, nurse navigators, and social work navigators. This article provides a resource for administrators to create job descriptions for navigators with specific levels of expertise and for patient navigators to advance their oncology careers and attain a higher level of expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Carrie Dorn
- National Association of Social Workers, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sharon Gentry
- Academy of Oncology Nurse and Patient Navigators (AONN+), Lewisville, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Kyandra Fox
- Patient Navigation, Education and Training, Susan G. Komen Foundation, Allen, Texas, USA
| | - Donna Wilson
- HCA Henrico Doctors' Hospital/Virginia Cancer Patient Navigator Network (VaCPNN), Midlothian, Virginia, USA
| | - Sora Tanjasiri
- Department of Health, Society and Behavior, University of Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | | | - Elba L Saavedra Ferrer
- College of Education and Human Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ver Hoeve ES, Calhoun E, Hernandez M, High E, Armin JS, Ali-Akbarian L, Frithsen M, Andrews W, Hamann HA. Evaluating implementation of a community-focused patient navigation intervention at an NCI-designated cancer center using RE-AIM. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:550. [PMID: 38685006 PMCID: PMC11059763 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10919-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient navigation is an evidence-based intervention that reduces cancer health disparities by directly addressing the barriers to care for underserved patients with cancer. Variability in design and integration of patient navigation programs within cancer care settings has limited this intervention's utility. The implementation science evaluation framework, RE-AIM, allows quantitative and qualitative examination of effective implementation of patient navigation programs into cancer care settings. METHODS The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework was used to evaluate implementation of a community-focused patient navigation intervention at an NCI-designated cancer center between June 2018 and October 2021. Using a 3-month longitudinal, non-comparative measurement period, univariate and bivariate analyses were conducted to examine associations between participant-level demographics and primary (i.e., barrier reduction) and secondary (i.e., patient-reported outcomes) effectiveness outcomes. Mixed methods analyses were used to examine adoption and delivery of the intervention into the cancer center setting. Process-level analyses were used to evaluate maintenance of the intervention. RESULTS Participants (n = 311) represented a largely underserved population, as defined by the National Cancer Institute, with the majority identifying as Hispanic/Latino, having a household income of $35,000 or less, and being enrolled in Medicaid. Participants were diagnosed with a variety of cancer types and most had advanced staged cancers. Pre-post-intervention analyses indicated significant reduction from pre-intervention assessments in the average number of reported barriers, F(1, 207) = 117.62, p < .001, as well as significant increases in patient-reported physical health, t(205) = - 6.004, p < .001, mental health, t(205) = - 3.810, p < .001, self-efficacy, t(205) = - 5.321, p < .001, and satisfaction with medical team communication, t(206) = - 2.03, p = .029. Referral patterns and qualitative data supported increased adoption and integration of the intervention into the target setting, and consistent intervention delivery metrics suggested high fidelity to intervention delivery over time. Process-level data outlined a successful transition from a grant-funded community-focused patient navigation intervention to an institution-funded program. CONCLUSIONS This study utilized the implementation science evaluation framework, RE-AIM, to evaluate implementation of a community-focused patient navigation program. Our analyses indicate successful implementation within a cancer care setting and provide a potential guide for other oncology settings who may be interested in implementing community-focused patient navigation programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael Frithsen
- Banner Health, Tucson, AZ, USA
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Wendy Andrews
- Banner Health, Tucson, AZ, USA
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reaves S, Hall KC, Stewart MW, Wentzensen N, Ferrell C, Risley C, Wells J, Rives R, Bobo F, Daniels J, Farrington K, Morgan JC, Clarke MA. Evaluation of Follow-up Colposcopy Procedures After Abnormal Cervical Screening Result Across a Statewide Study in Mississippi. RESEARCH SQUARE 2024:rs.3.rs-3943646. [PMID: 38410464 PMCID: PMC10896379 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3943646/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
Purpose Cervical screening is used to detect and treat precancers to prevent invasive cancers. However, successful prevention also requires adequate follow-up and treatment of individuals with abnormal screening results. The aim was to investigate demographics, clinical characteristics, and follow-up status for individuals needing colposcopy after an abnormal screening result. Methods The STRIDES (Studying Risk to Improve DisparitiES) cohort comprises individuals undergoing cervical cancer screening and management at a Mississippi Health Department or University of Mississippi clinic. Follow-up status, demographics, and clinical data were assessed from electronic health records and, if necessary, patient navigation on individuals identified as needing a colposcopy after an abnormal screening. Results Of the 1,458 individuals requiring colposcopy, 43.0% had the procedure within 4 months, 16.4% had a delayed procedure, and 39.5% had no documented follow-up, with significant predictors of follow-up identified as age and cytology diagnosis. Based on age, individuals 30 + were more likely to follow up with a colposcopy compared to individuals < 30 years (49% and 38.7%, respectively; p < .001). Individuals with cytology diagnoses of LSIL (52.9%), ASC-H (51.4%), and HSIL (62.3%) had higher percentages of adherence to follow-up colposcopy guidelines (p < .001). Conclusion Despite high cervical cancer screening rates among Mississippians, a substantial portion did not have adequate next-step intervention. However, it is encouraging that highest risk individuals were more likely to have a colposcopy. Regardless, continuing to understand the underlying causes for incomplete follow-up is crucial for timely secondary targeted interventions to reduce cervical cancer burden, promote awareness, and improve health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney Reaves
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, School of Nursing
| | | | | | | | | | - Carolann Risley
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, Cancer Research Institute
| | - Jimmie Wells
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, School of Nursing
| | - Rhonda Rives
- Mississippi Baptist Medical Center, Department of Pathology
| | - Fajada Bobo
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, Department of Pathology
| | | | | | - Jody C Morgan
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Graboyes EM, Chappell M, Duckett KA, Sterba K, Halbert CH, Hill EG, Chera B, McCay J, Puram SV, Ramadan S, Sandulache VC, Kahmke R, Nussenbaum B, Alberg AJ, Paskett ED, Calhoun E. Patient Navigation for Timely, Guideline-Adherent Adjuvant Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A National Landscape Analysis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:1251-1259.e5. [PMID: 38081134 PMCID: PMC10846494 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aligned with the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Head and Neck Cancers, in November 2021 the Commission on Cancer approved initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery for head and neck cancer (HNC) as its first and only HNC quality metric. Unfortunately, >50% of patients do not commence PORT within 6 weeks, and delays disproportionately burden racial and ethnic minority groups. Although patient navigation (PN) is a potential strategy to improve the delivery of timely, equitable, guideline-adherent PORT, the national landscape of PN for this aspect of care is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS From September through November 2022, we conducted a survey of health care organizations that participate in the American Cancer Society National Navigation Roundtable to understand the scope of PN for delivering timely, guideline-adherent PORT for patients with HNC. RESULTS Of the 94 institutions that completed the survey, 89.4% (n=84) reported that at least part of their practice was dedicated to navigating patients with HNC. Sixty-eight percent of the institutions who reported navigating patients with HNC along the continuum (56/83) reported helping them begin PORT. One-third of HNC navigators (32.5%; 27/83) reported tracking the metric for time-to-PORT at their facility. When estimating the timeframe in which the NCCN and Commission on Cancer guidelines recommend commencing PORT, 44.0% (37/84) of HNC navigators correctly stated ≤6 weeks; 71.4% (60/84) reported that they did not know the frequency of delays starting PORT among patients with HNC nationally, and 63.1% (53/84) did not know the frequency of delays at their institution. CONCLUSIONS In this national landscape survey, we identified that PN is already widely used in clinical practice to help patients with HNC start timely, guideline-adherent PORT. To enhance and scale PN within this area and improve the quality and equity of HNC care delivery, organizations could focus on providing better education and support for their navigators as well as specialization in HNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M. Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Michelle Chappell
- American Cancer Society National Navigation Roundtable, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Kelsey A. Duckett
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Katherine Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Chanita Hughes Halbert
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Elizabeth G. Hill
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Bhishamjit Chera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Jessica McCay
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Sidharth V. Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Salma Ramadan
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Vlad C. Sandulache
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- ENT Section, Operative Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Russel Kahmke
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian Nussenbaum
- American Board of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Houston, Texas
| | - Anthony J. Alberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Electra D. Paskett
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
- Division of Cancer Prevention Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Elizabeth Calhoun
- Department of Population Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yeh SCJ, Wang WC, Yu HC, Wu TY, Lo YY, Shi HY, Chou HC. Relationship between using cancer resource center services and patient outcomes. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:706. [PMID: 37975908 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08169-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Psychological and social support are crucial in treating cancer. Cancer resource centers provide patients with cancer and their families with services that can help them through cancer treatment, ensure that patients receive adequate treatment, and reduce cancer-related stress. These centers offer various services, including medical guidance, health education, emotional assistance (e.g., consultations for cancer care), and access to resources such as financial aid and post recovery programs. In this study, we comprehensively analyzed how cancer resource centers assist patients with cancer and improve their clinical outcomes. METHODS The study participants comprised patients initially diagnosed with head and neck cancer or esophageal cancer. A total of 2442 patients from a medical center in Taiwan were included in the study. Data were analyzed through logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS The results indicate that unemployment, blue-collar work, and a lower education level were associated with higher utilization of cancer resource center services. The patients who were unemployed or engaged in blue-collar work had higher risks of mortality than did their white-collar counterparts. Patient education programs can significantly improve the survival probability of patients with cancer. On the basis of our evaluation of the utilization and benefits of services provided by cancer resource centers, we offer recommendations for improving the functioning of support systems for patients with cancer and provide suggestions for relevant future research. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that cancer resource centers provide substantial support for patients of low socioeconomic status and improve patients' survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Chuan Jennifer Yeh
- Institute of Health Care Management & Department of Business Management, National Sun Yat-Sen University, 70 Lian Hai Road, Kaohsiung, 80424, Taiwan.
| | - Wen Chun Wang
- Department of Business Management, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsien-Chung Yu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Yu Wu
- National Taiwan University Hospital Research Ethics Committee Office, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Ying Lo
- Department of Healthcare Administration, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hon-Yi Shi
- Department of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsueh-Chih Chou
- Department of Business Management, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Feldman S, Lykken JM, Haas JS, Werner CL, Kobrin SC, Tiro JA, Chubak J, Kamineni A. Factors associated with timely colposcopy following an abnormal cervical cancer test result. Prev Med 2022; 164:107307. [PMID: 36270434 PMCID: PMC9808794 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Successful cervical cancer prevention requires screening and appropriate management of abnormal test results. Management includes diagnostic evaluation and treatment, if indicated, based on cervical cancer risk after most abnormal test results. There is little guidance on the optimal timing of diagnostic evaluation, and few data exist on factors associated with timely management. We quantified time-to-colposcopy within 12 months of an abnormal cervical cancer screening or surveillance test result from 2010 to 2018 across three diverse healthcare systems and described factors associated with timely colposcopy. Among 21-65 year-old patients with an abnormal test result for which colposcopy was indicated (n = 28,706), we calculated the proportion who received a colposcopy within 12 months of the abnormal test and used Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate the probability of colposcopy within 12 months. Across all systems, 75.3% of patients received a colposcopy within 12 months, with site-specific estimates ranging from 70.0 to 83.0%. We fit mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with receipt of colposcopy within 12 months. The healthcare system and cytology result severity were the most important factors associated with of timely colposcopy. We observed that sites with more centralized processes had higher proportions of colposcopy completion, and patients with high-grade results were more consistently evaluated earlier than patients with low-grade results. Patient age also affected receipt of timely colposcopy, though this association differed by healthcare system and result severity. These data suggest opportunities for system-level interventions to improve management of abnormal cervical cancer test results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Feldman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Jacquelyn M Lykken
- Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - Jennifer S Haas
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Claudia L Werner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America; Parkland Health, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - Sarah C Kobrin
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Jasmin A Tiro
- Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America; Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - Jessica Chubak
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Aruna Kamineni
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alimena S, Davis M, Pelletier A, Terry K, King M, Feldman S. Regional Variation in Access to Oncologic Care and Racial Disparities Among Cervical Cancer Patients. Am J Clin Oncol 2022; 45:415-421. [PMID: 36111738 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to determine whether access to gynecologic oncologists is correlated with disparate outcomes among cervical cancer patients, especially among Black women. MATERIALS AND METHODS An ecological study was performed using the National Cancer Database among stage I-IVA cervical cancer patients from 2004 to 2014. Data from the National Cancer Institute, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and the United States Census were compiled to describe access to care by region. Factors associated with receipt of optimal treatment (defined as surgery and/or radiation for stage IA-IB1 and IIA1; radiation and chemotherapy for stage IB2, IIA2, IIB-IVA or node positive disease) were identified using multivariate logistic regressions stratified by region, controlling for confounding factors including the number of gynecologic oncologists per states in each subregion. Cox multivariate survival analyses stratified by region were also performed. RESULTS Of 42,213 women, 17.0% were Black. On multivariate analysis controlling for confounders, all Southern women were less likely to receive optimal treatment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.75-0.85, P <0.001) compared with Northeastern women. Black women in the South (aOR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.70-0.83, P <0.001) and Midwest (aOR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68-0.90, P <0.001) were less likely to receive optimal treatment compared with non-Black women in those regions. Black women in the South (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04-1.18, P <0.001) and West (aHR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.11-1.62, P =0.002) had worse mortality compared with non-Black women in those regions, despite controlling for access to gynecologic oncologists. The South, Midwest, and West had proportionally fewer cancer centers and gynecologic oncologists compared with the Northeast. CONCLUSIONS Southern women are at risk of inadequate treatment for cervical cancer, and Black Southern women are at even higher risk of inadequate treatment and worse overall survival despite controlling for access to gynecologic oncologists. Social determinants of health and other barriers besides access to oncologists likely contribute to observed regional and racial disparities among cervical cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Alimena
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
| | - Michelle Davis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute
| | - Andrea Pelletier
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Kathryn Terry
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Martin King
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | - Sarah Feldman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rajabiun S, Xiao V, Bak S, Robbins C, Casanova N, Cabral HJ, Lemon SC, Haas JS, Freund KM, Battaglia T. Using community-engaged methods to develop a study protocol for a cost analysis of a multi-site patient navigation intervention for breast cancer care. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:881. [PMID: 35804359 PMCID: PMC9264587 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08192-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient navigation is an evidence-based intervention for reducing delays in oncology care among underserved populations. In order to address the financial sustainability of this intervention, information is needed on the cost of implementing patient navigation in diverse healthcare settings. Because patient navigation programs and care settings are highly variable, this paucity of cost data creates difficulties in identifying best practices and decisions about the feasibility of implementing navigation programs within a health care system. One barrier to collecting these cost data is the lack of assessment tools available to support patient navigation programs. These tools must be relevant to the wide variety of navigation activities that exist in health care settings, and be flexible enough to collect cost data important to stakeholders in fee-for-service and value-based care environments. METHODS AND RESULTS We present a novel approach and methods for assessing the cost of a patient navigation program implemented across six hospital systems to enhance timely entry and uptake of breast cancer care and treatment. These methods and tools were developed in partnership with breast oncology patient navigators and supervisors using principles of stakeholder engagement, with the goal of increasing usability and feasibility in the field. CONCLUSIONS This methodology can be used to strengthen cost analysis and assessment tools for other navigation programs for improving care and treatment for patients with chronic conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03514433.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Rajabiun
- Department of Public Health, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | - Howard J Cabral
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Tracy Battaglia
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Garfield KM, Franklin EF, Battaglia TA, Dwyer AJ, Freund KM, Wightman PD, Rohan EA. Evaluating the sustainability of patient navigation programs in oncology by length of existence, funding, and payment model participation. Cancer 2022; 128 Suppl 13:2578-2589. [PMID: 35699609 PMCID: PMC10961851 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For this study, the authors examined whether specific programmatic factors were associated with the sustainability of patient navigation programs. METHODS This cross-sectional survey explored navigation programmatic factors associated with 3 measures of sustainability: 1) length of program existence, 2) reliance on sustainable funding, and 3) participation in alternative payment models. In total, 750 patient navigators or program administrators affiliated with oncology navigation programs in clinical-based and community-based settings completed the survey between April and July 2019. RESULTS Associations were observed between both accreditation and work setting and measures of program sustainability. Accredited programs and larger, more resourced clinical institutions were particularly likely to exhibit multiple measures of sustainability. The results also identified significant gaps at the programmatic level in data collection and reporting among navigation programs, but no association was observed between programmatic data collection/reporting and sustainability. CONCLUSIONS Navigation is not currently a reimbursable service and has historically been viewed as value-added in oncology settings. Therefore, factors associated with sustainability are critical to understand how to build a framework for successful navigation programs within the current system and also to develop the case for potential reimbursement in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn M. Garfield
- Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | - Tracy A. Battaglia
- Women’s Health Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrea J. Dwyer
- Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Karen M. Freund
- Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Elizabeth A. Rohan
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Battaglia TA, Fleisher L, Dwyer AJ, Wiatrek DE, Wells KJ, Wightman P, Strusowski T, Calhoun E. Barriers and opportunities to measuring oncology patient navigation impact: Results from the National Navigation Roundtable survey. Cancer 2022; 128 Suppl 13:2568-2577. [PMID: 35699612 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient navigation improves cancer care delivery for those most at risk for poor outcomes. Lack of sustainable funding threatens the full integration of navigation services into health care delivery systems. Standardized navigation metrics that document impact and identify best practices are necessary to support sustainability. METHODS The National Navigation Roundtable administered a web-based, cross-sectional survey to oncology patient navigation programs to identify barriers and facilitators to the use of navigation metrics. The 38-item survey asked about data-collection practices and specific navigation metrics used by the program. Exploratory and descriptive statistics were used to identify factors associated with data collection and reporting. RESULTS Seven hundred fifty respondents from across the country represented navigation programs across the continuum of care. Although 538 respondents (72%) reported participating in routine data collection, only one-half of them used data for reporting purposes. For the 374 programs that used electronic health records, only 40% had discrete, reportable navigation fields, and 25% had an identifier for navigated patients. Program funding was identified as the only characteristic associated with data collection, whereas the type of data collected was associated with work setting, participation in alternative payment models, and where on the continuum navigation services are provided. Respondents participating in an oncology accreditation program were more likely to collect specific outcome metrics across the continuum and to use those data for reporting purposes. The most common barriers to data collection were time (55%) and lack of support for complex data systems and/or platforms (50%). CONCLUSIONS Inconsistent data collection and reporting of oncology navigation programs remain a threat to sustainability. Aligning data collection with oncology accreditation, funding, and reimbursement is a viable path forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy A Battaglia
- Women's Health Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Evans Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Linda Fleisher
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrea J Dwyer
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, The Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | - Kristen J Wells
- Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | - Patrick Wightman
- Center for Population Health Sciences, Arizona Health Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | - Elizabeth Calhoun
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Le T, Miller S, Berry E, Zamarripa S, Rodriguez A, Barkley B, Kandathil A, Brewington C, Argenbright KE, Gerber DE. Implementation and Uptake of Rural Lung Cancer Screening. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:480-487. [PMID: 35143786 PMCID: PMC8923939 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Given the higher rates of tobacco use along with increased mortality specific to lung cancer in rural settings, low-dose CT (LDCT)-based lung cancer screening could be particularly beneficial to such populations. However, limited radiology facilities and increased geographical distance, combined with lower income and education along with reduced patient engagement, present heightened barriers to screening initiation and adherence. METHODS In collaboration with community leaders and stakeholders, we developed and implemented a community-based lung cancer screening program, including telephone-based navigation and tobacco cessation counseling support, serving 18 North Texas counties. Funding was available to support clinical services costs where needed. We collected data on LDCT referrals, orders, and completion. RESULTS To raise awareness for lung cancer screening, we leveraged our established collaborative network of more than 700 community partners. In the first year of operation, 107 medical providers referred 570 patients for lung cancer screening, of whom 488 (86%) were eligible for LDCT. The most common reasons for ineligibility were age (43%) and insufficient tobacco history (20%). Of 381 ordered LDCTs, 334 (88%) were completed. Among screened patients, 61% were current smokers and 36% had insurance coverage for the procedure. The program cost per patient was $430. DISCUSSION Implementation, uptake, and completion of LDCT-based lung cancer screening is feasible in rural settings. Community outreach, health promotion, and algorithm-based navigation may support such efforts. Given low lung cancer screening rates nationally and heightened lung cancer risk in rural populations, similar programs in other regions may be particularly impactful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tri Le
- Department of Internal Medicine (Hematology-Oncology), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Stacie Miller
- Senior Program Manager, Oncology Screening Services, Moncrief Cancer Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Emily Berry
- Clinical Research Manager, Moncrief Cancer Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sarah Zamarripa
- Population Research Project Associate, Moncrief Cancer Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Aurelio Rodriguez
- Senior Grants and Contracts Specialist, Moncrief Cancer Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Benjamin Barkley
- Assistant Director of Clinical Facilities and Operations, Moncrief Cancer Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Asha Kandathil
- Assistant Professor of Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Cecelia Brewington
- Professor of Radiology; Vice Chair of Clinical Operations, Department of Radiology; Chief of Community Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Keith E Argenbright
- Professor of Population and Data Sciences, and Family and Community Medicine; Director of Behavioral Sciences; Director of Moncrief Cancer Institute, Department of Population and Data Sciences, and Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - David E Gerber
- Professor of Internal Medicine (Hematology-Oncology) and Population and Data Sciences; Associate Director of Clinical Research, Department of Internal Medicine (Hematology-Oncology), Department of Population and Data Sciences; and Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hu F, Strohbach A, Martinez NG, Simon MA, Yee LM. Patient and Provider Perceptions of a Patient Navigation Program to Improve Postpartum Care Among Publicly Insured Women. Am J Perinatol 2021; 38:248-257. [PMID: 31491803 PMCID: PMC9472559 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1696671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was aimed to assess patient and provider perceptions of a postpartum patient navigation program. STUDY DESIGN This was a mixed-method assessment of a postpartum patient navigation program. Navigating New Motherhood (NNM) participants completed a follow-up survey including the Patient Satisfaction with Interpersonal Relationship with Navigator (PSN-I) scale and an open-ended question. PSN-I scores were analyzed descriptively. Eighteen provider stakeholders underwent in-depth interviews to gauge program satisfaction, perceived outcomes, and ideas for improvement. Qualitative data were analyzed by the constant comparative method. RESULTS In this population of low-income, minority women, participants (n = 166) were highly satisfied with NNM. The median PSN-I score was 45 out of 45 (interquartile range [IQR]: 43-45), where a higher score corresponds to higher satisfaction. Patient feedback was also highly positive, though a small number desired more navigator support. Provider stakeholders offered consistently positive program feedback, expressing satisfaction with NNM execution and outcomes. Provider stakeholders noted that navigators avoided inhibiting clinic workflow and eased clinic administrative burden. They perceived NNM improved multiple clinical and satisfaction outcomes. All provider stakeholders believed that NNM should be sustained long-term; suggestions for improvement were offered. CONCLUSION A postpartum patient navigation program can perceivably improve patient satisfaction, clinical care, and clinic workflow without burden to clinic providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengling Hu
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Angelina Strohbach
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Noelle G. Martinez
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Melissa A. Simon
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Preventive Medicine, and Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lynn M. Yee
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Incorporation of a patient navigator into a secondary fracture prevention program identifies barriers to patient care. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32:2557-2564. [PMID: 32030610 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01486-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient navigation improves outcomes in various clinical contexts, but has not been evaluated in secondary fracture prevention. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients, age 50 + from April to October, 2016 hospitalized with fragility fracture contacted by a patient navigator. Patients were identified using an electronic tool extracting data from electronic medical records which alerted the patient navigator to contact patients by phone post-discharge to schedule appointments to "High-Risk Osteoporosis Clinic" (HiROC) and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan. Primary outcome was transition from hospital to HiROC. We also compared completion of DXA, five osteoporosis-associated in-hospital laboratory tests (calcium, 25-hydroxy vitamin D, complete blood count, renal, and liver function), osteoporosis medication prescription and adherence, and other patient characteristics to historical controls (2014-2015) without patient navigation. Comparisons were made using Chi-square, Fisher's Exact, two-sample t test or Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, as appropriate. RESULTS The proportion of patients transitioning to HiROC with and without patient navigation was not different (53% vs. 48%, p = 0.483), but DXA scan completion was higher (90% vs. 67%, p = 0.006). No difference in medication initiation within 3 months post discharge (73% vs. 65%, p = 0.387) or adherence at 6 months (68% vs. 71%, p = 0.777) was found. Patients attending HiROC lived closer (11 vs. 43 miles, p < 0.001) and more likely to follow-up in surgery clinic (95% vs. 61%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Patient navigation did not improve transition to HiROC. Longer travel distance may be a barrier-unaffected by patient navigation. Identifying barriers may inform best practices for Fracture Liaison Service programs.
Collapse
|
14
|
Molina Y, Khanna A, Watson KS, Villines D, Bergeron N, Strayhorn S, Strahan D, Skwara A, Cronin M, Mohan P, Walton S, Wang T, Schneider JA, Calhoun EA. Leveraging system sciences methods in clinical trial evaluation: An example concerning African American women diagnosed with breast cancer via the Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2019; 15:100411. [PMID: 31406947 PMCID: PMC6682374 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Systems science methodologies offer a promising assessment approach for clinical trials by: 1) providing an in-silico laboratory to conduct investigations where purely empirical research may be infeasible or unethical; and, 2) offering a more precise measurement of intervention benefits across individual, network, and population levels. We propose to assess the potential of systems sciences methodologies by quantifying the spillover effects of randomized controlled trial via empirical social network analysis and agent-based models (ABM). Design/methods We will evaluate the effects of the Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas (PNMUA) study on adult African American participants diagnosed with breast cancer and their networks through social network analysis and agent-based modeling. First, we will survey 100 original trial participants (50 navigated, 50 non-navigated) and 150 of members of their social networks (75 from navigated, 75 non-navigated) to assess if navigation results in: 1) greater dissemination of breast health information and breast healthcare utilization throughout the trial participants’ networks; and, 2) lower incremental costs, when incorporating navigation effects on trial participants and network members. Second, we will compare cost-effectiveness models, using a provider perspective, incorporating effects on trial participants versus trial participants and network members. Third, we will develop an ABM platform, parameterized using published data sources and PNMUA data, to examine if navigation increases the proportion of early stage breast cancer diagnoses. Discussion Our study results will provide promising venues for leveraging systems science methodologies in clinical trial evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yamilé Molina
- School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Aditya Khanna
- The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 5065, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Karriem S Watson
- University of Illinois Cancer Center, 1801 W Taylor St #1E, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.,School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Dana Villines
- Advocate Health Care Research Institute, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nyahne Bergeron
- School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Shaila Strayhorn
- Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1747 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, IL, 60608, USA
| | - Desmona Strahan
- Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1747 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, IL, 60608, USA
| | - Abigail Skwara
- The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 5065, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Michael Cronin
- The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 5065, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Prashanthinie Mohan
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona, 550 East Van Buren Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - Surrey Walton
- College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 West Wood, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Tianxiu Wang
- Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1747 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, IL, 60608, USA
| | - John A Schneider
- The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 5065, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Calhoun
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona, 550 East Van Buren Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Qian F, Gates M, Bisner S, Collins E, Vora S, Dacus H. Benefits, Cost, and Activities of Patient Navigation (PN) Program for Colorectal Cancer Screening at the Charles B. Wang Community Health Center (CBWCHC). J Immigr Minor Health 2019; 22:476-483. [PMID: 31254139 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-019-00913-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate the benefits of a PN program for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening at Charles B. Wang Community Health Center (CBWCHC) in New York City from June 2012 to May 2015, estimate the cost of implementation, and describe time allocation patterns of PN activities. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key informants of the CBWCHC in 2015. The electronic PN database was used to evaluate the program's effectiveness. New York State Department of Health budgeting and cost data were used to estimate the implementation cost. Self-reported activities of PNs were used to analyze time allocation patterns. A total of 3723 screen-eligible patients were contacted by PNs and 2552 (68.5%) completed at least one CRC screening test. Of these, 266 (10.4%) patients were diagnosed with precancerous polyps and two patients were diagnosed with CRC. The CRC screening rate at CBWCHC increased from 56% to 60% during the program period. The total cost was estimated to be $295,296.51 (in 2014 dollar terms). Overall, this relatively inexpensive CRC screening PN program was effective in increasing CRC screening in a low-income Asian-American community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Qian
- Department of Health Policy, Management, and Behavior, School of Public Health, University at Albany - State University of New York, Rensselaer, NY, 12144-3445, USA.
| | - Margaret Gates
- Bureau of Cancer Prevention and Control, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Sharon Bisner
- Bureau of Cancer Prevention and Control, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Elisè Collins
- Bureau of Cancer Prevention and Control, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Shalini Vora
- Center for Comprehensive Care and Diagnosis of Inherited Blood Disorders, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Heather Dacus
- Bureau of Cancer Prevention and Control, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Britt HR, JaKa MM, Fernstrom KM, Bingham PE, Betzner AE, Taghon JR, Shippee ND, Shippee TP, Schellinger SE, Anderson EW. Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of LifeCourse on Utilization and Patient and Caregiver Quality of Life and Experience. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2019; 36:408-416. [PMID: 30541333 PMCID: PMC6442020 DOI: 10.1177/1049909118817740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Whole-person care is a new paradigm for serious illness, but few programs have been robustly studied. We sought to test the effect of LifeCourse (LC), a person-centered program for patients living with serious illness, on health-care utilization, care experience, and quality of life, employing a quasi-experimental design with a Usual Care (UC) comparison group. The study was conducted 2012 to 2017 at an upper-Midwest not-for-profit health-care system with outcomes measured every 3 months until the end of life. Enrolled patients (N = 903) were estimated to be within 3 years of end of life and diagnosed with 1+ serious illness. Exclusion criteria included hospice enrollment at time of screening or active dying. Community health workers (CHWs) delivered standardized monthly 1-hour home visits based on palliative care guidelines and motivational interviewing to promote patients' physical, psychosocial, and financial well-being. Primary outcomes included health-care utilization and patient- and caregiver-experience and quality of life. Patients were elderly (LC 74, UC 78 years) and primarily non-Hispanic, white, living at home with cardiovascular disease as the primary diagnosis (LC 69%, UC 57%). A higher proportion of LC patients completed advance directives (N = 173, 38%) than UC patients (N = 66, 15%; P < .001). LifeCourse patients who died spent more days in hospice (88 ± 191 days) compared to UC patients (44 ± 71 days; P = .018). LifeCourse patients reported greater improvements than UC in communication as part of the care experience ( P = .016). Implementation of person-centered programs delivered by CHWs is feasible; inexpensive upstream expansion of palliative care models can yield benefits for patients and caregivers. Trial Registration: Trial NCT01746446 was registered on November 27, 2012 at ClinicalTrials.gov .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Nathan D. Shippee
- Division of Health Policy-Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
MN, USA
| | - Tetyana P. Shippee
- Division of Health Policy-Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
MN, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bernardo BM, Zhang X, Beverly Hery CM, Meadows RJ, Paskett ED. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of patient navigation programs across the cancer continuum: A systematic review. Cancer 2019; 125:2747-2761. [PMID: 31034604 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Published studies regarding patient navigation (PN) and cancer were reviewed to assess quality, determine gaps, and identify avenues for future research. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for studies investigating the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of PN across the cancer continuum. Each included article was scored independently by 2 separate reviewers with the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. The current review identified 113 published articles that assessed PN and cancer care, between August 1, 2010, and February 1, 2018, 14 of which reported on the cost-effectiveness of PN programs. Most publications focused on the effectiveness of PN in screening (50%) and diagnosis (27%) along the continuum of cancer care. Many described the effectiveness of PN for breast cancer (52%) or colorectal cancer outcomes (51%). Most studies reported favorable outcomes for PN programs, including increased uptake of and adherence to cancer screenings, timely diagnostic resolution and follow-up, higher completion rates for cancer therapy, and higher rates of attending medical appointments. Cost-effectiveness studies showed that PN programs yielded financial benefits. Quality assessment showed that 75 of the 113 included articles (65%) had 2 or more weak components. In conclusion, this review indicates numerous gaps within the PN and cancer literature where improvement is needed. For example, more research is needed at other points along the continuum of cancer care outside of screening and diagnosis. In addition, future research into the effectiveness of PN for understudied cancers outside of breast and colorectal cancer is necessary along with an assessment of cost-effectiveness and more rigorous reporting of study designs and results in published articles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany M Bernardo
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Xiaochen Zhang
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Chloe M Beverly Hery
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Rachel J Meadows
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Electra D Paskett
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.,Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Simon MA, Tom LS, Leung I, Wong E, Knightly EE, Vicencio DP, Yau A, Ortigara K, Dong X. The Chinatown Patient Navigation Program: Adaptation and Implementation of Breast and Cervical Cancer Patient Navigation in Chicago's Chinatown. Health Serv Insights 2019; 12:1178632919841376. [PMID: 31037032 PMCID: PMC6475834 DOI: 10.1177/1178632919841376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background As health care reform continues within the United States, navigators may play increasingly diverse and vital roles across the health care continuum. The growing interest in patient navigation programs for underserved populations calls for detailed descriptions of intervention components to facilitate implementation and dissemination efforts. Methods In Chicago's Chinatown, Chinese immigrant women face language, cultural, and access barriers in obtaining breast and cervical cancer screening and follow-up. These barriers spurred the research partnership between Northwestern University, the Chinese American Service League, Mercy Hospital & Medical Center, and Rush University Medical Center to formalize the Chinatown Patient Navigation Collaborative for adapting and implementing previously developed patient navigation models. Results In this report, we describe the adaptation of patient navigation to build the Chinatown Patient Navigation Collaborative's community-based patient navigation program for breast and cervical cancer. We offer insights into the roles of community patient navigators in safety net hospital and underserved Chinese immigrant communities, and describe implications for patient navigation initiatives to maximize community benefits by improving access to health care for vulnerable populations. Conclusions Our adaptation and implementation of a patient navigation intervention in Chicago's Chinatown illustrates promising approaches for future navigator research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A Simon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.,Preventive Medicine and Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Laura S Tom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ivy Leung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.,Chinese American Service League, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Esther Wong
- Chinese American Service League, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Eileen E Knightly
- University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Ann Yau
- Mercy Hospital & Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - XinQi Dong
- Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bush ML, Kaufman MR, Shackleford T. Adherence in the Cancer Care Setting: a Systematic Review of Patient Navigation to Traverse Barriers. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2018; 33:1222-1229. [PMID: 28567667 PMCID: PMC5711635 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1235-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Patient navigation is an evidence-based intervention involving trained healthcare workers who assist patients in assessing and mitigating personal and environmental factors to promote healthy behaviors. The purpose of this research is to systematically assess the efficacy of patient navigation and similar programs to improve diagnosis and treatment of diseases affecting medically underserved populations. A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and CINAHL to identify potential studies. Eligible studies were those containing original peer-reviewed research reports in English on patient navigation, community health workers, vulnerable and underserved populations, and healthcare disparity. Specific outcomes regarding patient navigator including the effect of the intervention on definitive diagnosis and effect on initiation of treatment were extracted from each study. The search produced 1428 articles, and 16 were included for review. All studies involved patient navigation in the field of oncology in underserved populations. Timing of initial contact with a patient navigator after diagnostic or screening testing is correlated to the effectiveness of the navigator intervention. The majority of the studies reported significantly shorter time intervals to diagnosis and to treatment with patient navigation. Patient navigation expedites oncologic diagnosis and treatment of patients in underserved populations. This intervention is more efficacious when utilized shortly after screening or diagnostic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L Bush
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, 800 Rose St, Rm C-236, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA.
| | - Michael R Kaufman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, 800 Rose St, Rm C-236, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sacco AG, Coffey CS, Sanghvi P, Rubio GP, Califano J, Athas J, Tamayo GJ, Linnemeyer K, Barnachea LC, Orosco RK, Brumund KT, Cohen EE, Gold K, Mell LK, Sharabi A, Daniels GA, Abbott Y, Collins R, Clynch K, Noboa M, Blumenfeld L. Development of Care Pathways to Standardize and Optimally Integrate Multidisciplinary Care for Head and Neck Cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/10463356.2018.1527118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Jayna Athas
- UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, Calif
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kathryn Gold
- UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, Calif
| | | | | | | | - Yuko Abbott
- UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, Calif
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Neal CD, Weaver DT, Raphel TJ, Lietz AP, Flores EJ, Percac-Lima S, Knudsen AB, Pandharipande PV. Patient Navigation to Improve Cancer Screening in Underserved Populations: Reported Experiences, Opportunities, and Challenges. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15:1565-1572. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
22
|
Glassgow AE, Molina Y, Kim S, Campbell RT, Darnell J, Calhoun EA. A Comparison of Different Intensities of Patient Navigation After Abnormal Mammography. Health Promot Pract 2018; 20:914-921. [PMID: 29907079 DOI: 10.1177/1524839918782168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background. Patient navigation is a practice strategy to address barriers to timely diagnosis and treatment of cancer. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of varying intensities of patient navigation and timely diagnostic resolution after abnormal mammography. Method. This is a secondary analysis of a subset of women with an abnormal screening or diagnostic mammogram who participated in the "patient navigation in medically underserved areas" 5-year randomized trial. We compared timely diagnostic resolution in women assigned to different intensities of patient navigation including, full navigation intervention, no contact with navigators, or limited contact with navigators. Results. The sample included 1,725 women with abnormal mammogram results. Women who interacted with patient navigators had significantly fewer days to diagnostic resolution after abnormal mammography compared with women who did not interact with patient navigators. Discussion. Results from our study suggest that even limited contact with navigators encourages women to seek more timely diagnostic resolution after an abnormal mammogram, which may offer a low-cost practice strategy to improve timely diagnosis for disadvantaged and underserved women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sage Kim
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gervès-Pinquié C, Girault A, Phillips S, Raskin S, Pratt-Chapman M. Economic evaluation of patient navigation programs in colorectal cancer care, a systematic review. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2018; 8:12. [PMID: 29904805 PMCID: PMC6002330 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-018-0196-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Patient navigation has expanded as a promising approach to improve cancer care coordination and patient adherence. This paper addresses the need to identify the evidence on the economic impact of patient navigation in colorectal cancer, following the Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines. Articles indexed in Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Web of Science between January 2000 and March 2017 were analyzed. We conducted a systematic review of the literature using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality assessment of the included studies was based on the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. Inclusion criteria indicated that the paper's subject had to explicitly address patient navigation in colorectal cancer and the study had to be an economic evaluation. The search yielded 243 papers, 9 of which were finally included within this review. Seven out of the nine studies included met standards for high-quality based on CHEERS criteria. Eight concluded that patient navigation programs were unequivocally cost-effective for the health outcomes of interest. Six studies were cost-effectiveness analyses. All studies computed the direct costs of the program, which were defined a minima as the program costs. Eight of the reviewed studies adopted the healthcare system perspective. Direct medical costs were usually divided into outpatient and inpatient visits, tests, and diagnostics. Effectiveness outcomes were mainly assessed through screening adherence, quality of life and time to diagnostic resolution. Given these outcomes, more economic research is needed for patient navigation during cancer treatment and survivorship as well as for patient navigation for other cancer types so that decision makers better understand costs and benefits for heterogeneous patient navigation programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloé Gervès-Pinquié
- Research Institute for Environmental and Occupational Health (Irset-Inserm UMR1085), Ester Team – UFR Santé – Département de Médecine, Rue Haute de Reculée, 49045 ANGERS Cedex01, France
| | - Anne Girault
- EA MOS 7348 - French School of Public Health, 20 avenue George Sand, 93200 Saint Denis, France
| | - Serena Phillips
- Institute for Patient-Centered Initiatives and Health Equity at the George Washington University Cancer Center, 2600 Virginia Avenue NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20037 USA
| | - Sarah Raskin
- L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs, Virginia Commonwealth University, Scherer Hall, #313923 W. Franklin Street, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
| | - Mandi Pratt-Chapman
- Institute for Patient-Centered Initiatives and Health Equity at the George Washington University Cancer Center, 2600 Virginia Avenue NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20037 USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Weiner AB, Matulewicz RS, Tosoian JJ, Feinglass JM, Schaeffer EM. The effect of socioeconomic status, race, and insurance type on newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer in the United States (2004-2013). Urol Oncol 2017; 36:91.e1-91.e6. [PMID: 29153624 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Revised: 09/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the characteristics of men who initially present with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) can better enable directed improvement initiatives. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and newly diagnosed mPCa. MATERIALS METHODS All men diagnosed with PCa in the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2013 were identified. Characteristics of men presenting with and without metastatic disease were compared. A 4-level composite metric of SES was created using Census-based income and education data. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between SES, race/ethnicity, and insurance and the risk of presenting with mPCa at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS Of 1,034,754 patients diagnosed with PCa, 4% had mPCa at initial presentation. Lower SES (first vs. fourth quartile; odds ratio [OR] = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.35-1.44), black and Hispanic race/ethnicity (vs. white; OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.43-1.51 and OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.17-1.28, respectively), and having Medicaid or no insurance (vs. Medicare or private; OR = 3.91, 95% CI: 3.78-4.05) were each independently associated with higher odds of presenting with mPCa after adjusting for all other covariates. CONCLUSIONS Lower SES, race/ethnicity, and having Medicaid or no insurance were each independently associated with higher odds of presenting with metastases at the time of PCa diagnosis. Our findings may partially explain current PCa outcomes disparities and inform future efforts to reduce disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam B Weiner
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Richard S Matulewicz
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Jeffrey J Tosoian
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Joseph M Feinglass
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Edward M Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Selby K, Baumgartner C, Levin TR, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, Schottinger J, Jensen CD, Lee JK, Corley DA. Interventions to Improve Follow-up of Positive Results on Fecal Blood Tests: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med 2017; 167:565-575. [PMID: 29049756 PMCID: PMC6178946 DOI: 10.7326/m17-1361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal immunochemical testing is the most commonly used method for colorectal cancer screening worldwide. However, its effectiveness is frequently undermined by failure to obtain follow-up colonoscopy after positive test results. PURPOSE To evaluate interventions to improve rates of follow-up colonoscopy for adults after a positive result on a fecal test (guaiac or immunochemical). DATA SOURCES English-language studies from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Embase from database inception through June 2017. STUDY SELECTION Randomized and nonrandomized studies reporting an intervention for colonoscopy follow-up of asymptomatic adults with positive fecal test results. DATA EXTRACTION Two reviewers independently extracted data and ranked study quality; 2 rated overall strength of evidence for each category of study type. DATA SYNTHESIS Twenty-three studies were eligible for analysis, including 7 randomized and 16 nonrandomized studies. Three were at low risk of bias. Eleven studies described patient-level interventions (changes to invitation, provision of results or follow-up appointments, and patient navigators), 5 provider-level interventions (reminders or performance data), and 7 system-level interventions (automated referral, precolonoscopy telephone calls, patient registries, and quality improvement efforts). Moderate evidence supported patient navigators and provider reminders or performance data. Evidence for system-level interventions was low. Seventeen studies reported the proportion of test-positive patients who completed colonoscopy compared with a control population, with absolute differences of -7.4 percentage points (95% CI, -19 to 4.3 percentage points) to 25 percentage points (CI, 14 to 35 percentage points). LIMITATION More than half of studies were at high or very high risk of bias; heterogeneous study designs and characteristics precluded meta-analysis. CONCLUSION Patient navigators and giving providers reminders or performance data may help improve colonoscopy rates of asymptomatic adults with positive fecal blood test results. Current evidence about useful system-level interventions is scant and insufficient. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Cancer Institute. (PROSPERO: CRD42016048286).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Selby
- From Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California; University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California
| | - Christine Baumgartner
- From Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California; University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California
| | - Theodore R Levin
- From Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California; University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California
| | - Chyke A Doubeni
- From Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California; University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California
| | - Ann G Zauber
- From Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California; University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California
| | - Joanne Schottinger
- From Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California; University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California
| | - Christopher D Jensen
- From Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California; University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California
| | - Jeffrey K Lee
- From Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California; University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California
| | - Douglas A Corley
- From Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California; University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bush ML, Taylor ZR, Noblitt B, Shackleford T, Gal TJ, Shinn JB, Creel LM, Lester C, Westgate PM, Jacobs JA, Studts CR. Promotion of early pediatric hearing detection through patient navigation: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 Suppl 7:S1-S13. [PMID: 28940335 DOI: 10.1002/lary.26822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Revised: 06/26/2017] [Accepted: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To assess the efficacy of a patient navigator intervention to decrease nonadherence to obtain audiological testing following failed screening, compared to those receiving the standard of care. METHODS Using a randomized controlled design, guardian-infant dyads, in which the infants had abnormal newborn hearing screening, were recruited within the first week after birth. All participants were referred for definitive audiological diagnostic testing. Dyads were randomized into a patient navigator study arm or standard of care arm. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with follow-up nonadherence to obtain diagnostic testing. Secondary outcomes were parental knowledge of infant hearing testing recommendations and barriers in obtaining follow-up testing. RESULTS Sixty-one dyads were enrolled in the study (patient navigator arm = 27, standard of care arm = 34). The percentage of participants nonadherent to diagnostic follow-up during the first 6 months after birth was significantly lower in the patient navigator arm compared with the standard of care arm (7.4% vs. 38.2%) (P = .005). The timing of initial follow-up was significantly lower in the navigator arm compared with the standard of care arm (67.9 days after birth vs. 105.9 days, P = .010). Patient navigation increased baseline knowledge regarding infant hearing loss diagnosis recommendations compared with the standard of care (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS Patient navigation decreases nonadherence rates following abnormal infant hearing screening and improves knowledge of follow-up recommendations. This intervention has the potential to improve the timeliness of delivery of infant hearing healthcare; future research is needed to assess the cost and feasibility of larger scale implementation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 1b. Laryngoscope, 127:S1-S13, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L Bush
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Zachary R Taylor
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Bryce Noblitt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | | | - Thomas J Gal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Jennifer B Shinn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Liza M Creel
- Department of Health Management and Systems Sciences, University of Louisville School of Public Health and Information Sciences, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Cathy Lester
- Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Commission for Children with Special Health Care Needs, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Philip M Westgate
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Julie A Jacobs
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A
| | - Christina R Studts
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Reuland DS, Brenner AT, Hoffman R, McWilliams A, Rhyne RL, Getrich C, Tapp H, Weaver MA, Callan D, Cubillos L, Urquieta de Hernandez B, Pignone MP. Effect of Combined Patient Decision Aid and Patient Navigation vs Usual Care for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Vulnerable Patient Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177:967-974. [PMID: 28505217 PMCID: PMC5710456 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underused, especially among vulnerable populations. Decision aids and patient navigation are potentially complementary interventions for improving CRC screening rates, but their combined effect on screening completion is unknown. OBJECTIVE To determine the combined effect of a CRC screening decision aid and patient navigation compared with usual care on CRC screening completion. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this randomized clinical trial, data were collected from January 2014 to March 2016 at 2 community health center practices, 1 in North Carolina and 1 in New Mexico, serving vulnerable populations. Patients ages 50 to 75 years who had average CRC risk, spoke English or Spanish, were not current with recommended CRC screening, and were attending primary care visits were recruited and randomized 1:1 to intervention or control arms. INTERVENTIONS Intervention participants viewed a CRC screening decision aid in English or Spanish immediately before their clinician encounter. The decision aid promoted screening and presented colonoscopy and fecal occult blood testing as screening options. After the clinician encounter, intervention patients received support for screening completion from a bilingual patient navigator. Control participants viewed a food safety video before the encounter and otherwise received usual care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was CRC screening completion within 6 months of the index study visit assessed by blinded medical record review. RESULTS Characteristics of the 265 participants were as follows: their mean age was 58 years; 173 (65%) were female, 164 (62%) were Latino; 40 (15%) were white non-Latino; 61 (23%) were black or of mixed race; 191 (78%) had a household income of less than $20 000; 101 (38%) had low literacy; 75 (28%) were on Medicaid; and 91 (34%) were uninsured. Intervention participants were more likely to complete CRC screening within 6 months (68% vs 27%); adjusted-difference, 40 percentage points (95% CI, 29-51 percentage points). The intervention was more effective in women than in men (50 vs 21 percentage point increase, interaction P = .02). No effect modification was observed across other subgroups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE A patient decision aid plus patient navigation increased the rate of CRC screening completion in compared with usual care invulnerable primary care patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02054598.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel S Reuland
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill2Division of General Medicine & Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill3Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Alison T Brenner
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill2Division of General Medicine & Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill3Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Richard Hoffman
- Department of Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City5University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City6Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque
| | - Andrew McWilliams
- Department of Family Medicine, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Robert L Rhyne
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque8University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque
| | - Christina Getrich
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque9Department of Anthropology, University of Maryland, College Park
| | - Hazel Tapp
- Department of Family Medicine, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Mark A Weaver
- Division of General Medicine & Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill10Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Danelle Callan
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque
| | - Laura Cubillos
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | | | - Michael P Pignone
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill2Division of General Medicine & Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill3Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill11Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Dell Medical School, Austin
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ali-Faisal SF, Colella TJF, Medina-Jaudes N, Benz Scott L. The effectiveness of patient navigation to improve healthcare utilization outcomes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2017; 100:436-448. [PMID: 27771161 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2016] [Revised: 09/09/2016] [Accepted: 10/14/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of patient navigation (PN) on healthcare utilization outcomes using meta-analysis and the quality of evidence. METHODS Medical and social science databases were searched for randomized controlled trials published in English between 1989 and May 2015. The review process was guided by PRISMA. Included studies were assessed for quality using the Downs and Black tool. Data were extracted to assess the effect of navigation on: health screening rates, diagnostic resolution, cancer care follow-up treatment adherence, and attendance of care events. Random-effects models were used to compute risk ratios and I2 statistics determined the impact of heterogeneity. RESULTS Of 3985 articles screened, 25 articles met inclusion criteria. Compared to usual care, patients who received PN were significantly more likely to access health screening (OR 2.48, 95% CI, 1.93-3.18, P<0.00001) and attend a recommended care event (OR 2.55, 95% CI, 1.27-5.10, P<0.01). PN was favoured to increase adherence to cancer care follow-up treatment and obtain diagnoses. Most studies involved trained lay navigators (n=12) compared to health professionals (n=9). CONCLUSION PN is effective to increase screening rates and complete care events. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS PN is an effective intervention for use in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sobia F Ali-Faisal
- Program in Public Health, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.
| | - Tracey J F Colella
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; University Health Network/Toronto Rehabilitation Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation Program, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Naomi Medina-Jaudes
- Program in Public Health, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.
| | - Lisa Benz Scott
- Program in Public Health, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA; The School of Health Technology & Management, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tong EK, Nguyen TT, Lo P, Stewart SL, Gildengorin GL, Tsoh JY, Jo AM, Kagawa-Singer ML, Sy AU, Cuaresma C, Lam HT, Wong C, Tran MT, Chen MS. Lay health educators increase colorectal cancer screening among Hmong Americans: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Cancer 2016; 123:98-106. [PMID: 27564924 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2016] [Revised: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asian Americans have lower colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates than non-Hispanic white individuals. Hmong Americans have limited socioeconomic resources and literacy. The current randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine whether bilingual/bicultural lay health educator (LHE) education could increase CRC screening among Hmong Americans. METHODS A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted among Hmong Americans in Sacramento, California. LHEs and recruited participants were randomized to intervention or control groups. The intervention group received CRC education over 3 months delivered by an LHE. The control group received education regarding nutrition and physical activity delivered by a health educator. The outcomes were changes in self-reported ever-screening and up-to-date CRC screening after 6 months. RESULTS All 329 participants were foreign-born with mostly no formal education, limited English proficiency, and no employment. The majority of the participants were insured and had a regular source of health care. The intervention group experienced greater changes after the intervention than the control group for ever-screening (P = .068) and being up-to-date with screening (P<.0001). In multivariable regression analyses, the intervention group demonstrated a greater increase than the control group in reporting ever-screening (adjusted odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.79) and being up-to-date with screening (adjusted odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-2.32). Individuals who had health insurance were found to have >4 times the odds of receiving screening, both ever-screening and up-to-date screening. A higher CRC knowledge score mediated the intervention effect for both screening outcomes. CONCLUSIONS A culturally and linguistically appropriate educational intervention delivered by trained LHEs was found to increase CRC screening in an immigrant population with low levels of education, employment, English proficiency, and literacy. Cancer 2017;98-106. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa K Tong
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Tung T Nguyen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Penny Lo
- Hmong Women's Heritage Association, Sacramento, California
| | - Susan L Stewart
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Ginny L Gildengorin
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Janice Y Tsoh
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Angela M Jo
- University of New Mexico at Albuquerque, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Marjorie L Kagawa-Singer
- Fielding School of Public Health and Asian American Studies Center, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Angela U Sy
- University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Manoa, Hawaii
| | | | - Hy T Lam
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ching Wong
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Mi T Tran
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Moon S Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, California
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fouad MN, Acemgil A, Bae S, Forero A, Lisovicz N, Martin MY, Oates GR, Partridge EE, Vickers SM. Patient Navigation As a Model to Increase Participation of African Americans in Cancer Clinical Trials. J Oncol Pract 2016; 12:556-63. [PMID: 27189356 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2015.008946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Less than 10% of patients enrolled in clinical trials are minorities. The patient navigation model has been used to improve access to medical care but has not been evaluated as a tool to increase the participation of minorities in clinical trials. The Increasing Minority Participation in Clinical Trials project used patient navigators (PNs) to enhance the recruitment of African Americans for and their retention in therapeutic cancer clinical trials in a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. METHODS Lay individuals were hired and trained to serve as PNs for clinical trials. African American patients potentially eligible for clinical trials were identified through chart review or referrals by clinic nurses, physicians, and social workers. PNs provided two levels of services: education about clinical trials and tailored support for patients who enrolled in clinical trials. RESULTS Between 2007 and 2014, 424 African American patients with cancer were referred to the Increasing Minority Participation in Clinical Trials project. Of those eligible for a clinical trial (N = 378), 304 (80.4%) enrolled in a trial and 272 (72%) consented to receive patient navigation support. Of those receiving patient navigation support, 74.5% completed the trial, compared with 37.5% of those not receiving patient navigation support. The difference in retention rates between the two groups was statistically significant (P < .001). Participation of African Americans in therapeutic cancer clinical trials increased from 9% to 16%. CONCLUSION Patient navigation for clinical trials successfully retained African Americans in therapeutic trials compared with non-patient navigation trial participation. The model holds promise as a strategy to reduce disparities in cancer clinical trial participation. Future studies should evaluate it with racial/ethnic minorities across cancer centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona N Fouad
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Aras Acemgil
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Sejong Bae
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
de la Riva EE, Hajjar N, Tom LS, Phillips S, Dong X, Simon MA. Providers' Views on a Community-Wide Patient Navigation Program: Implications for Dissemination and Future Implementation. Health Promot Pract 2016; 17:382-90. [PMID: 27009130 PMCID: PMC5600160 DOI: 10.1177/1524839916628865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The DuPage Patient Navigation Collaborative (DPNC) adapted and scaled the Patient Navigation Research Program's intervention model to navigate uninsured suburban DuPage County women with an abnormal breast or cervical cancer screening result. Recent findings reveal the effectiveness of the DPNC in addressing patient risk factors for delayed follow-up, but gaps remain as patient measures may not adequately capture navigator impact. Using semistructured interviews with 19 DPNC providers (representing the county health department, clinics, advocacy organizations, and academic partners), this study explores the critical roles of the DPNC in strengthening community partnerships and enhancing clinical services. Findings from these provider interviews revealed that a wide range of resources existed within DuPage but were often underused. Providers indicated that the DPNC was instrumental in fostering community partnerships and that navigators enhanced the referral processes, communications, and service delivery among clinical teams. Providers also recommended expanding navigation to mental health, women's health, and for a variety of chronic conditions. Considering that many in the United States have recently gained access to the health care system, clinical teams might benefit by incorporating navigators who serve a dual working purpose embedded in the community and clinics to enhance the service delivery for vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Laura S Tom
- Northwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sara Phillips
- Northwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - XinQi Dong
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Melissa A Simon
- Northwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Marshall JK, Mbah OM, Ford JG, Phelan-Emrick D, Ahmed S, Bone L, Wenzel J, Shapiro GR, Howerton M, Johnson L, Brown Q, Ewing A, Pollack CE. Effect of Patient Navigation on Breast Cancer Screening Among African American Medicare Beneficiaries: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med 2016; 31:68-76. [PMID: 26259762 PMCID: PMC4700012 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-015-3484-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2014] [Revised: 01/12/2015] [Accepted: 02/04/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing evidence that patient navigation improves breast cancer screening rates; however, there are limited efficacy studies of its effect among African American older adult women. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of patient navigation on screening mammography among African American female Medicare beneficiaries in Baltimore, MD. DESIGN The Cancer Prevention and Treatment Demonstration (CPTD), a multi-site study, was a randomized controlled trial conducted from April 2006 through December 2010. SETTING Community-based and clinical setting. PARTICIPANTS The CPTD Screening Trial enrolled 1905 community-dwelling African American female Medicare beneficiaries who were ≥65 years of age and resided in Baltimore, MD. Participants were recruited from health clinics, community centers, health fairs, mailings using Medicare rosters, and phone calls. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized to either: printed educational materials on cancer screening (control group) or printed educational materials + patient navigation services designed to help participants overcome barriers to cancer screening (intervention group). MAIN MEASURE Self-reported receipt of mammography screening within 2 years of the end of the study. KEY RESULTS The median follow-up period for participants in this analysis was 17.8 months. In weighted multivariable logistic regression analyses, women in the intervention group had significantly higher odds of being up to date on mammography screening at the end of the follow-up period compared to women in the control group (odds ratio [OR] 2.26, 95 % confidence interval [CI]1.59-3.22). The effect of the intervention was stronger among women who were not up to date with mammography screening at enrollment (OR 3.63, 95 % CI 2.09-6.38). CONCLUSION Patient navigation among urban African American Medicare beneficiaries increased self-reported mammography utilization. The results suggest that patient navigation for mammography screening should focus on women who are not up to date on their screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Olive M Mbah
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jean G Ford
- Department of Medicine, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
| | - Darcy Phelan-Emrick
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Saifuddin Ahmed
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lee Bone
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Wenzel
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Acute and Chronic Care, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gary R Shapiro
- Health Partners Cancer Program and Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Mollie Howerton
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Altovise Ewing
- Formerly of the Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Craig Evan Pollack
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Darling M, Gonzalez F, Graves K, Sheppard VB, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Leventhal KG, Caicedo L. Practical Tips for Establishing Partnerships With Academic Researchers: A Resource Guide for Community-Based Organizations. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2015; 9:203-12. [PMID: 26412762 DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research exists on strategies for successful conduct of community-based participatory research (CBPR). Unfortunately, few published resources are available to advise community-based organizations (CBOs) on preparation for and engagement in CBPR. OBJECTIVES We aimed to create a resource for CBOs that describes how an organization can prepare for and participate in CBPR. METHODS We used a case study approach of one CBO with a decade-long history of collaboration with academic researchers. We identified lessons learned through a retrospective review of organizational records and the documentation of experiences by CBO leadership and research partners. The findings were then labeled according to CBPR Partnership Readiness Model dimensions. LESSONS LEARNED The review of CBO documents and key informant interviews yielded ten practical tips to increase organizational readiness for and engagement in CBPR. CONCLUSIONS By understanding the best practices for organizational readiness for and participation in CPBR, CBOs will be better equipped to actively participate in community-academic partnerships.
Collapse
|
34
|
Ustjanauskas AE, Bredice M, Nuhaily S, Kath L, Wells KJ. Training in Patient Navigation: A Review of the Research Literature. Health Promot Pract 2015; 17:373-81. [PMID: 26656600 DOI: 10.1177/1524839915616362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Despite the proliferation of patient navigation programs designed to increase timely receipt of health care, little is known about the content and delivery of patient navigation training, or best practices in this arena. The current study begins to address these gaps in understanding, as it is the first study to comprehensively review descriptions of patient navigation training in the peer-reviewed research literature. Seventy-five patient navigation efficacy studies published since 1995, identified through PubMed and by the authors, were included in this narrative review. Fifty-nine of the included studies (79%) mentioned patient navigation training, and 55 of these studies additionally provided a description of training. Most studies did not thoroughly document patient navigation training practices. Additionally, several topics integral to the role of patient navigators, as well as components of training central to successful adult learning, were not commonly described in the research literature. Descriptions of training also varied widely across studies in terms of duration, location, format, learning strategies employed, occupation of trainer, and content. These findings demonstrate the need for established standards of navigator training as well as for future research on the optimal delivery and content of patient navigation training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy E Ustjanauskas
- University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Lisa Kath
- San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Kristen J Wells
- University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Matulewicz RS, Brennan J, Pruthi RS, Kundu SD, Gonzalez CM, Meeks JJ. Radical Cystectomy Perioperative Care Redesign. Urology 2015; 86:1076-86. [PMID: 26383615 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2015] [Revised: 08/19/2015] [Accepted: 09/01/2015] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present an evidence-based review of the perioperative management of the radical cystectomy (RC) patient in the context of a care redesign initiative. METHODS A comprehensive review of the key factors associated with perioperative management of the RC patient was completed. PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane databases were queried via a computerized search. Specific topics were reviewed within the scope of the three major phases of perioperative management: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. Preference was given to evidence from prospective randomized trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. RESULTS Preoperative considerations to improve care in the RC patient should include multi-disciplinary medical optimization, patient education, and formal coordination of care. Efforts to mitigate the risk of malnutrition and reduce postoperative gastrointestinal complications may include carbohydrate loading, protein nutrition supplementation, and avoiding bowel preparation. Intraoperatively, a fluid and opioid sparing protocol may reduce fluid shifts and avoid complications from paralytic ileus. Finally, enhanced recovery protocols including novel medications, early feeding, and multi-modal analgesia approaches are associated with earlier postoperative convalescence. CONCLUSION RC is a complex and morbid procedure that may benefit from care redesign. Evidence based quality improvement is integral to this process. We hope that this review will help guide further improvement initiatives for RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard S Matulewicz
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| | - Jeffrey Brennan
- Department of Anesthesia, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Raj S Pruthi
- Department of Urology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Shilajit D Kundu
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Chris M Gonzalez
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Joshua J Meeks
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
In the early 1990s, women living in a medically underserved community acted as lay navigators to help other women overcome barriers to breast cancer screening and follow-up (Freeman, Muth, & Kerner, 1995). At that time, treatment for cancer was straightforward. Today, cancer treatment is complex, and understanding the diagnosis, treatment, and healthcare system requires the skill of an oncology nurse navigator (ONN). Navigation includes the entire healthcare continuum-from prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship to end of life. The goal of navigation is to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality by eliminating barriers to timely access to cancer care, which may be financial, psychological, logistic, or related to communication or the healthcare delivery system.
Collapse
|
37
|
Simon MA, Tom LS, Nonzee NJ, Murphy KR, Endress R, Dong X, Feinglass J. Evaluating a bilingual patient navigation program for uninsured women with abnormal screening tests for breast and cervical cancer: implications for future navigator research. Am J Public Health 2015; 105:e87-94. [PMID: 25713942 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2014.302341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The DuPage Patient Navigation Collaborative evaluated the Patient Navigation Research Program (PNRP) model for uninsured women receiving free breast or cervical cancer screening through the Illinois Breast and Cervical Cancer Program in DuPage County, Illinois. METHODS We used medical records review and patient surveys of 477 women to compare median follow-up times with external Illinois Breast and Cervical Cancer Program and Chicago PNRP benchmarks of performance. We examined the extent to which we mitigated community-defined timeliness risk factors for delayed follow-up, with a focus on Spanish-speaking participants. RESULTS Median follow-up time (29.0 days for breast and 56.5 days for cervical screening abnormalities) compared favorably to external benchmarks. Spanish-speaking patients had lower health literacy, lower patient activation, and more health care system distrust than did English-speaking patients, but despite the prevalence of timeliness risk factors, we observed no differences in likelihood of delayed (> 60 days) follow-up by language. CONCLUSIONS Our successful replication and scaling of the PNRP navigation model to DuPage County illustrates a promising approach for future navigator research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A Simon
- Melissa A. Simon is with the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago. Laura S. Tom and Narissa J. Nonzee are with the Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University. Kara R. Murphy and Richard Endress are with Access DuPage, Wheaton, IL. XinQi Dong is with the Institute for Healthy Aging, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago. Joe Feinglass is with the Departments of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics and Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sheppard VB, Oppong BA, Hampton R, Snead F, Horton S, Hirpa F, Brathwaite EJ, Makambi K, Onyewu S, Boisvert M, Willey S. Disparities in breast cancer surgery delay: the lingering effect of race. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22:2902-11. [PMID: 25652051 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4397-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delays to surgical breast cancer treatment of 90 days or more may be associated with greater stage migration. We investigated racial disparities in time to receiving first surgical treatment in breast cancer patients. METHODS Insured black (56 %) and white (44 %) women with primary breast cancer completed telephone interviews regarding psychosocial (e.g., self-efficacy) and health care factors (e.g., communication). Clinical data were extracted from medical charts. Time to surgery was measured as the days between diagnosis and definitive surgical treatment. We also examined delays of more than 90 days. Unadjusted hazard ratios (HRs) examined univariate relationships between delay outcomes and covariates. Cox proportional hazard models were used for multivariate analyses. RESULTS Mean time to surgery was higher in blacks (mean 47 days) than whites (mean 33 days; p = .001). Black women were less likely to receive therapy before 90 days compared to white women after adjustment for covariates (HR .58; 95 % confidence interval .44, .78). Health care process factors were nonsignificant in multivariate models. Women with shorter delay reported Internet use (vs. not) and underwent breast-conserving surgery (vs. mastectomy) (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS Prolonged delays to definitive breast cancer surgery persist among black women. Because the 90-day interval has been associated with poorer outcomes, interventions to address delay are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa B Sheppard
- Breast Cancer Program and Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Goodman A, Nour N. Cervical cancer screening: the complex interplay of medical infrastructure, society, and culture. Oncologist 2014; 19:315-7. [PMID: 24682462 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Annekathryn Goodman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Divisions of Gynecologic Oncology and Women's Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Global Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Race and ethnicity in cancer therapy: what have we learned? Clin Pharmacol Ther 2014; 95:403-12. [PMID: 24419564 DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2014.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2014] [Accepted: 01/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Racial and ethnic disparities in the pathogenesis of common malignancies and outcomes from treatment remain a major health concern. Factors attributed to these disparities include differences in lifestyle, environment, genetics, and tumor biology. As we strive to personalize cancer therapy, it will be imperative that we understand the relative contributions of each factor so that we may apply this knowledge in choosing the best treatment for each individual, regardless of his or her racial or ethnic heritage.
Collapse
|