Results of a randomized, double-blind study of romiplostim versus placebo in patients with low/intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and thrombocytopenia

High- vs regular-dose recombinant human thrombopoietin plus cyclosporine A in patients with newly diagnosed non-severe aplastic anemia: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine A (CsA) and regular doses of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) can accelerate platelet recovery in patients with non-severe aplastic anemia (NSAA). However, it is unclear whether CsA plus rhTPO at a higher dose can further increase the efficacy.

METHODS

Data from patients with newly diagnosed NSAA, who had been treated with CsA in combination with different doses of rhTPO between February 2021 and August 2021 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital, were reviewed. All the enrolled patients had been treated with CsA at 3-5 mg/(kg/d), and patients were further classified into high-dose (with rhTPO 30000U qd × 14 days for 2 months) group or regular-dose (with rhTPO 15000U qd × 7days for 3 months) group. The treatment response and therapy-related adverse events were compared.

RESULTS

36 patients including 16 (44.4%) in the high-dose and 20 (55.6%) in the regular-dose group were enrolled. The baseline characteristics were compatible between the two groups. The platelet counts were significantly higher at 1/3/6 months in the high-dose group (p = 0.028, 0.0063 and p = 0.040, respectively). The high-dose group had a significantly shorter time to platelet transfusion independence ([1 (0.5-6) months vs 2.5 (1-12) months, p = 0.040]). There was no significant difference in overall response and complete response rate between the two groups at 1/3/6/12 months (p > 0.05). Treatment-related morbidities were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding a higher dose of rhTPO can further accelerate platelet recovery and platelet transfusion independence in patients with newly diagnosed NSAA.

Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS): The Current and Future Treatment Landscape

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogenous clonal disorder of hemopoietic stem cells characterized by cytomorphologic dysplasia, ineffective hematopoiesis, peripheral cytopenias and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Our understanding of this disease has continued to evolve over the last century. More recently, prognostication and treatment have been determined by cytogenetic and molecular data. Specific genetic abnormalities, such as deletion of the long arm of chromosome 5 (del(5q)), TP53 inactivation and SF3B1 mutation, are increasingly associated with disease phenotype and outcome, as reflected in the recently updated fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors (WHO5) and the International Consensus Classification 2022 (ICC 2022) classification systems. Treatment of lower-risk MDS is primarily symptom directed to ameliorate cytopenias. Higher-risk disease warrants disease-directed therapy at diagnosis; however, the only possible cure is an allogenic bone marrow transplant. Novel treatments aimed at rational molecular and cellular pathway targets have yielded a number of candidate drugs over recent years; however few new approvals have been granted. With ongoing research, we hope to increasingly offer our MDS patients tailored therapeutic approaches, ultimately decreasing morbidity and mortality.

How I diagnose and treat thrombocytopenia in geriatric patients

ABSTRACT

Thrombocytopenia in older individuals is a common but diagnostically challenging condition that has variable clinical impact to those who are affected. Diagnostic approach requires evaluation of the preexisting clinical conditions, detailed review of medications, and assessment for disorders that warrant urgent treatment. In this article, we describe a systematic approach to diagnosis of thrombocytopenia and present a schematic review for management strategies. Three clinical scenarios are presented that are relevant for their prevalence and management challenges in an older adult population. The first scenario addresses primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and reviews different treatment options. The second one addresses complications of thrombocytopenia in management of the myelodysplastic syndrome. The last one reviews diagnostic challenges of drug-induced ITP.

Eltrombopag for Low-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Thrombocytopenia: Interim Results of a Phase II, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial (EQOL-MDS)

PURPOSE

In myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), severe thrombocytopenia is associated with poor prognosis. This multicenter trial presents the second-part long-term efficacy and safety results of eltrombopag in patients with low-risk MDS and severe thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

In this single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase-II trial of adult patients with International Prognostic Scoring System low- or intermediate-1-risk MDS, patients with a stable platelet (PLT) count (<30 × 103/mm3) received eltrombopag or placebo until disease progression. Primary end points were duration of PLT response (PLT-R; calculated from the time of PLT-R to date of loss of PLT-R, defined as bleeding/PLT count <30 × 103/mm3 or last date in observation) and long-term safety and tolerability. Secondary end points included incidence and severity of bleeding, PLT transfusions, quality of life, leukemia-free survival, progression-free survival, overall survival and pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2021, of 325 patients screened, 169 patients were randomly assigned oral eltrombopag (N = 112) or placebo (N = 57) at a starting dose of 50 mg once daily to maximum of 300 mg. PLT-R, with 25-week follow-up (IQR, 14-68) occurred in 47/111 (42.3%) eltrombopag patients versus 6/54 (11.1%) in placebo (odds ratio, 5.9; 95% CI, 2.3 to 14.9; P < .001). In eltrombopag patients, 12/47 (25.5%) lost the PLT-R, with cumulative thrombocytopenia relapse-free survival at 60 months of 63.6% (95% CI, 46.0 to 81.2). Clinically significant bleeding (WHO bleeding score ≥ 2) occurred less frequently in the eltrombopag arm than in the placebo group (incidence rate ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.75; P = .0002). Although no difference in the frequency of grade 1-2 adverse events (AEs) was observed, a higher proportion of eltrombopag patients experienced grade 3-4 AEs (χ2 = 9.5, P = .002). AML evolution and/or disease progression occurred in 17% (for both) of eltrombopag and placebo patients with no difference in survival times.

CONCLUSION

Eltrombopag was effective and relatively safe in low-risk MDS with severe thrombocytopenia. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02912208 and EU Clinical Trials Register: EudraCT No. 2010-022890-33.

Updates on risk stratification and management of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms

The majority of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms patients present with anemia. Historically, these patients were treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), with modest responses. A subset of these patients with del(5q) may do better with lenalidomide. Recently, in randomized trials, luspatercept has shown better responses compared with ESAs in treatment-naive patients and imetelstat in patients refractory to ESAs. Other evaluated novel compounds (fostamatinib, H3B-880, roxadustat, pyruvate kinase receptor activator) have not yet shown meaningful efficacy. More needs to be done to improve outcomes; in pursuance of this, participation in clinical trials evaluating novel therapies should be encouraged. While lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms tend to have an indolent course, a subset of them has a dismal prognosis. Improving prognostication and serial monitoring will help in identifying high-risk patients for appropriate management.

Why do we not have more drugs approved for MDS? A critical viewpoint on novel drug development in MDS

Approval of new agents to treat higher risk (HR) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) has stalled since the approval of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi). In addition, the options for patients with lower risk (LR) MDS who have high transfusion needs and do not harbor ring sideroblasts or 5q- syndrome are limited. Here, we review the current treatment landscape in MDS and identify areas of unmet need, such as treatment after failure of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents or DNMTis, TP53-mutated disease, and MDS with potentially targetable mutations. We discuss how our understanding of MDS pathogenesis can inform therapy development, including treating HR-MDS similarly to AML and pursuing therapies to address splicing factor mutations and dysregulated inflammation. We then bring a critical lens to current methodology of MDS studies and propose solutions to improve the efficiency and yield of these clinical trials, including using the most meaningful response metrics and expanding enrollment.

Management of Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS)

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal hematologic disorders characterized by morphologic dysplasia, ineffective hematopoiesis, and cytopenia. In the past year, the classification of MDS has been updated in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemia with incorporation of morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Furthermore, the more comprehensive International Prognostic Scoring System-Molecular (IPSS-M) allows for improved risk stratification and prognostication. These three developments allow for more tailored therapeutic decision-making in view of the expanding treatment options in MDS. For patients with lower risk MDS, treatment is aimed at improving cytopenias, usually anemia. The recent approval of luspatercept and decitabine/cedazuridine have added on to the current armamentarium of erythropoietic stimulating agents and lenalidomide (for MDS with isolated deletion 5q). Several newer agents are being evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials for this group of patients, such as imetelstat and oral azacitidine. This review provides a summary of the classification systems, the prognostic scores and clinical management of patients with lower risk MDS.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Eltrombopag for Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Severe Thrombocytopenia: Results of the ASPIRE Extension Study

ASPIRE, a three-part, international, phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01440374), investigated eltrombopag efficacy and safety in patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (<25 × 109 platelets/L). Approximately 30-65% of patients in this open-label extension phase experienced clinically relevant thrombocytopenic events; no conclusions could be made regarding long-term efficacy (non-randomized design, no placebo control), and survival rates may simply reflect advanced disease. Long-term safety was consistent with the double-blind phase and contrasted with earlier SUPPORT study findings in higher-risk patients, suggesting that eltrombopag may have a role in treating thrombocytopenia in patients with low-/intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Evolution of Therapeutic Benefit Measurement Criteria in Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms

ABSTRACT

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) are heterogeneous, clonal myeloid neoplasms characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, progressive cytopenias, and an increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. The diversity in disease severity, morphology, and genetic landscape challenges not only novel drug development but also therapeutic response assessment. The MDS International Working Group (IWG) response criteria were first published in the year 2000 focusing on measures of blast burden reduction and hematologic recovery. Despite revision of the IWG criteria in 2006, correlation between IWG-defined responses and patient-focused outcomes, including long-term benefits, remains limited and has potentially contributed to failures of several phase III clinical trials. Several IWG 2006 criteria also lacked clear definitions leading to problems in practical applications and interobserver and intraobserver consistency of response reporting. Although the 2018 revision addressed lower-risk MDS, the most recent update in 2023 redefined responses for higher-risk MDS and has set out to provide clear definitions to enhance consistency while focusing on clinically meaningful outcomes and patient-centered responses. In this review, we analyze the evolution of the MDS response criteria, limitations, and areas of improvement.

The Management of Low-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes-Current Standards and Recent Advances

ABSTRACT

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are a heterogeneous group of hematologic neoplasms with varied natural histories and prognoses. Specific to this review, treatment of low-risk MDS most often focuses on improving quality of life by correcting cytopenias, as opposed to urgent disease modification to avoid acute myeloid leukemia. These treatments include transfusion support with iron chelation when necessary, growth factors including novel maturation agents such as luspatercept, lenalidomide for del(5q) disease, and, increasingly, low-dose hypomethylating agents. Recent advances in the understanding of the genetic lesions that drive MDS have prompted a reassessment of how low-risk disease is defined and helped to identify a subset of low-risk MDS patients who may benefit from a more aggressive treatment paradigm, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Current Therapeutic Landscape in Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

OPINION STATEMENT

Lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes are typically characterized by an indolent disease course with a relatively low risk of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia. These patients are classically identified using the revised International Prognostic Scoring System and most likely its molecular version in the near future which may change the paradigm of treatment. The overall goals of care are symptomatic control to reduce transfusion requirements and improve quality of life. Symptomatic anemia is the most common indication to initiate disease-specific therapies after the optimization of supportive measures. Currently, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents remain the standard upfront therapy for anemia, and patients with del(5q) cytogenetic changes can benefit from lenalidomide monotherapy. Other therapeutic options after failure of upfront treatment include luspatercept, hypomethylating agents, and immunosuppressive therapies after taking into account of individualized disease features. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative option and is usually reserved for medically fit patients with severe symptomatic cytopenias who failed all standard options and/or the disease is progressing toward higher risk categories. Fortunately, novel investigational therapies are rapidly emerging by targeting different biological processes contributing to MDS pathogenesis, and eligible patients should be managed in clinical trials if available.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Treatment of Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

MDS is a clonal stem cell neoplasm with a spectrum from lower risk disease to short term life threatening higher risk disease. The disease risk is dictated by clinical and molecular features. Majority of MDS patients including lower risk disease unfortunately succumb from disease related complications namely cytopenia. While cytopenias may be mild early upon diagnosis and can be surveilled, ultimately treatment is required. Anemia is the hall mark of disease and most common indication to treat in lower risk MDS. Erythroid stimulating agents are used in the first line setting. Treatment can be a personalized approach as in select patient such as patients with del(5q) and those with ringed sideroblasts, lenalidomide, and luspatercept can be extremely effective respectively at improving cytopenias. Younger patients and hypoplastic MDS have also shown and improved response to immunosuppressive therapy. Hypomethylating agents can be option for patients with higher risk features or thrombocytopenia/neutropenia. Refractory cytopenias still poses frustration as options are limited and there is need to add more treatments to our armamentarium.

Older Adults and Immune Thrombocytopenia: Considerations for the Clinician

Many epidemiological studies have shown that the incidence of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) increases after age 60 years and peaks in patients over age 80 years. Therefore, ITP is a concern for physicians taking care of older patients, especially regarding its diagnosis and management. The diagnostic work-up should exclude other causes of thrombocytopenia and secondary ITP, including myelodysplastic syndrome and drug-induced ITP. The treatment decision is influenced by an increased risk of bleeding, infectious diseases and thrombosis in this population and should take into account comorbidities and concomitant medications such as anticoagulant drugs. First-line treatment is based on short corticosteroids courses and intravenous immunoglobulin, which should be reserved for patients with more severe bleeding complications, with their higher risk of toxic effects as compared with younger patients. Second-line treatment should be tailored to the patient's history, comorbidities and preferences. Preferred second-line treatments are thrombopoietin receptor agonists for most groups and guidelines given their good efficacy/tolerance ratio, but the thrombotic risk is increased in older people. Other second-line options that can be good alternatives depending on the clinical context include rituximab, dapsone, fostamatinib or immunosuppressive drugs. Splenectomy is less often performed but remains an option for fit patients with chronic refractory disease. Emerging treatments such as Syk or Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and FcRn antagonists are becoming available for ITP and may modify the treatment algorithm in the near future. The aim of this review is to describe the particularities of the diagnosis and treatment of ITP in older people, including the response and tolerance to the currently available drugs. We also discuss some situations related to co-morbidities that can frequently lead to adapt the management strategy in older patients.

Lenalidomide and Eltrombopag for Treatment of Low- or Intermediate-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Result of a Phase II Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

Thrombocytopenia is a serious complication of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated with an increased bleeding risk and worse prognosis. Eltrombopag (ELT), a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, can increase platelet counts and reverse anti-megakaryopoietic effects of lenalidomide (LEN) in preclinical studies. We hypothesized ELT would reduce the incidence of thrombocytopenia in MDS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a Phase II multicenter trial of ELT and LEN in adult patients with low- or intermediate-1-risk MDS with symptomatic or transfusion-dependent anemia or thrombocytopenia (NCT01772420). Thrombocytopenic patients were started on ELT and subsequently treated with LEN after platelets were increased. Patients without thrombocytopenia were started on LEN monotherapy and treated with ELT if they became thrombocytopenic.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were enrolled; mean age was 71 years (range 34-93). Overall response rate (ORR) in the intention-to-treat population was 35% (18/52). ELT monotherapy led to ORR of 33.3% (7/21), 29% achieving hematologic improvement (HI)-Platelets, and 24% bilineage responses. LEN monotherapy had 38% ORR (6/16) with all responders achieving HI-Erythroid. Fifteen patients received both ELT and LEN with ORR of 33.3%, 20% achieved HI-Erythroid, and 20% HI-Platelets with 13% bilineage responses. Median duration of response was 40 weeks for ELT (range 8-ongoing), 41 weeks (25-ongoing) for LEN, and 88 weeks (8.3-ongoing) for ELT/LEN. Non-hematologic grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were infrequent. Among patients on ELT, 2 had major bleeding events, 1 had a reversible increase in peripheral blasts, and 1 developed marrow fibrosis after 6 years on ELT.

CONCLUSIONS

ELT and LEN are well tolerated and effective in achieving hematologic improvement in patients with low-/intermediate-risk MDS.

Advances in myelodysplastic syndromes: promising novel agents and combination strategies

INTRODUCTION

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell neoplasms that have limited approved treatment options. Multiple novel agents are currently being tested in a clinical trial setting. From a therapeutic perspective, MDS is generally divided into lower-risk and higher-risk disease. In this review, we summarize some of the most prominent novel agents currently in development.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on select clinical trials in both lower- and higher-risk MDS, elucidating the mechanisms of action and rationale for drug combinations and summarizing early safety and efficacy data using novel agents in MDS.

EXPERT OPINION

Advances in understanding the innate immune system, telomere biology, as well as genomic drivers of the disease have led to the development of multiple novel agents that are currently in late stages of clinical development in MDS. Imetelstat is being tested in lower-risk disease and the phase III clinical trial recently completed accrual. Magrolimab, sabatolimab, and venetoclax in addition to novel oral hypomethylating agents (HMA) are being investigated in higher-risk MDS. These advances will hopefully bring better treatment options to patients and lead to a shift in the treatment paradigm. Post HMA therapy remains an area of dire unmet need.

How I Manage Transplant Ineligible Patients with Myelodysplastic Neoplasms

Myelodysplastic neoplasms, formerly known as myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), represent a group of clonal disorders characterized by a high degree of clinical and molecular heterogeneity, and an invariable tendency to progress to acute myeloid leukemia. MDS typically present in the elderly with cytopenias of different degrees and bone marrow dysplasia, the hallmarks of the disease. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the sole curative approach to date. Nonetheless, given the disease’s demographics, only a minority of patients can benefit from this procedure. Currently used prognostic schemes such as the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS), and most recently the molecular IPSS (IPSS-M), guide clinical management by dividing MDS into two big categories: lower- and higher-risk cases, based on a cut-off score of 3.5. The main clinical problem of the lower-risk group is represented by the management of cytopenias, whereas the prevention of secondary leukemia progression is the goal for the latter. Herein, we discuss the non-transplant treatment of MDS, focusing on current practice and available therapeutic options, while also presenting new investigational agents potentially entering the MDS therapeutic arsenal in the near future.

Myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a family of myeloid cancers with diverse genotypes and phenotypes characterized by ineffective haematopoiesis and risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Some epidemiological data indicate that MDS incidence is increasing in resource-rich regions but this is controversial. Most MDS cases are caused by randomly acquired somatic mutations. In some patients, the phenotype and/or genotype of MDS overlaps with that of bone marrow failure disorders such as aplastic anaemia, paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) and AML. Prognostic systems, such as the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), provide reasonably accurate predictions of survival at the population level. Therapeutic goals in individuals with lower-risk MDS include improving quality of life and minimizing erythrocyte and platelet transfusions. Therapeutic goals in people with higher-risk MDS include decreasing the risk of AML transformation and prolonging survival. Haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can cure MDS, yet fewer than 10% of affected individuals receive this treatment. However, how, when and in which patients with HCT for MDS should be performed remains controversial, with some studies suggesting HCT is preferred in some individuals with higher-risk MDS. Advances in the understanding of MDS biology offer the prospect of new therapeutic approaches.

Phase Ib study of eltrombopag and azacitidine in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and related disorders (the ELASTIC study)

Treating adverse risk myelodysplastic syndromes with azacitidine exacerbates thrombocytopenia. We report a study of eltrombopag in combination with azacitidine using a 3 + 3 cohort design. Patients with baseline platelets of <150 × 109 /l received eltrombopag ranging from 25 to 300 mg. An 8-day pre-phase of eltrombopag was followed by two cycles of combined therapy. Amongst 31 patients, there were no dose-limiting toxicities. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 300 mg. Transient increases in bone marrow blasts at day 8 were common but no patient had protocol-defined progression following eltrombopag monotherapy. Marrow response rates after three and six treatment cycles were 32% and 29% respectively. In all, 70% of patients treated below and 36% treated at the MTD achieved a modified International Working Group 2006 platelet response at the end of cycle two. Of the platelet transfusion independent patients at baseline, 67% treated at the MTD became transfusion dependent during the first two cycles of treatment. Apart from lack of disease progression, our findings concur with a previously reported Phase III study (A StUdy of eltromboPag in myelodysPlastic SyndrOmes Receiving azaciTidine [SUPPORT]). We conclude that eltrombopag/azacitidine is safe in terms of conventional measures defined by adverse-event reporting. However, in light of SUPPORT and our own descriptive findings regarding efficacy, further combination studies in high-risk disease should be considered with caution.

The ABNL-MARRO 001 study: a phase 1–2 study of randomly allocated active myeloid target compound combinations in MDS/MPN overlap syndromes

Background

Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) comprise several rare hematologic malignancies with shared concomitant dysplastic and proliferative clinicopathologic features of bone marrow failure and propensity of acute leukemic transformation, and have significant impact on patient quality of life. The only approved disease-modifying therapies for any of the MDS/MPN are DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) for patients with dysplastic CMML, and still, outcomes are generally poor, making this an important area of unmet clinical need. Due to both the rarity and the heterogeneous nature of MDS/MPN, they have been challenging to study in dedicated prospective studies. Thus, refining first-line treatment strategies has been difficult, and optimal salvage treatments following DNMTi failure have also not been rigorously studied. ABNL-MARRO (A Basket study of Novel therapy for untreated MDS/MPN and Relapsed/Refractory Overlap Syndromes) is an international cooperation that leverages the expertise of the MDS/MPN International Working Group (IWG) and provides the framework for collaborative studies to advance treatment of MDS/MPN and to explore clinical and pathologic markers of disease severity, prognosis, and treatment response.

Methods

ABNL MARRO 001 (AM-001) is an open label, randomly allocated phase 1/2 study that will test novel treatment combinations in MDS/MPNs, beginning with the novel targeted agent itacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, combined with ASTX727, a fixed dose oral combination of the DNMTi decitabine and the cytidine deaminase inhibitor cedazuridine to improve decitabine bioavailability.

Discussion

Beyond the primary objectives of the study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of novel treatment combinations in MDS/MPN, the study will (i) Establish the ABNL MARRO infrastructure for future prospective studies, (ii) Forge innovative scientific research that will improve our understanding of pathogenetic mechanisms of disease, and (iii) Inform the clinical application of diagnostic criteria, risk stratification and prognostication tools, as well as response assessments in this heterogeneous patient population.

Trial registration

This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on August 19, 2019 (Registration No. NCT04061421).

Prospective validation of a biomarker-driven response prediction model to romiplostim in lower-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms - results of the EUROPE trial by EMSCO

The EUROPE phase 2 trial investigated the predictive value of biomarkers on the clinical efficacy of single agent romiplostim (ROM) treatment in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (LR-MDS) and thrombocytopenia within the ‘European Myelodysplastic Neoplasms Cooperative Group‘ (EMSCO) network. A total of 77 patients with LR-MDS and a median platelet count of 25/nl were included, all patients received ROM at a starting dose of 750 μg by SC injection weekly. Thirty-two patients (42%) achieved a hematologic improvement of platelets (HI-P) with a median duration of 340 days. Neutrophil (HI-N) and erythroid (HI-E) responses were observed in three (4%) and seven (9%) patients, respectively. We could not confirm previous reports that HI-P correlated with baseline endogenous thrombopoietin levels and platelet transfusion history, but SRSF2 mutation status and hemoglobin levels at baseline were significantly linked to HI-P. Sequential analysis of variant allelic frequency of mutations like SRSF2 did not reveal an impact of ROM on clonal evolution in both responders and non-responders. In summary, our study confirms the safety and efficacy of ROM in LR-MDS patients and may allow to better define subgroups of patients with a high likelihood of response.

Effect of thrombopoietin receptor agonist on health-related quality of life and platelet transfusion burden for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Thrombocytopenia is a common and unsolved problem in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients; we aimed to summarize the evidence of TPO-RA treatment for heath-related quality of life (HRQoL) and platelet transfusion burden of MDS patients. We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing TPO-RA to placebo in MDS published until July 31, 2021. A random-effect model was used. Eight RCTs with 908 patients were identified. Only three RCTs involving eltrombopag reported HRQoL, and all three studies treated HRQoL as a secondary outcome. In these three RCTs, the HRQoL instruments used in each study were different. However, this outcome cannot be meta-analyzed because some studies did not provide complete data. Subsequent clinical trials should pay more attention to this. Compared to placebo, TPO-RA did not affect platelet transfusion incidence 0.83 (95% CI 0.60-1.15). There was no evidence for subgroup differences in the analyses of different types of TPO-RA, different additional agent, and different types of MDS risk groups. However, platelet transfusion units (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.84) were significantly decreased. The RR of patients who did not require platelet transfusion for 56 or more consecutive days was not different between groups (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.34). TPO-RA may decrease platelet transfusion units in MDS patients with thrombocytopenia. But the significance of this finding should be interpreted with caution, because too few studies were meta-analyzed.

Past, present and future in low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by increased risk of acute myeloid leukemia transformation and cytopenia. The prognosis of MDS patients can be evaluated with various scoring systems, the most commonly used are IPSS (International Prognostic Scoring System), revised-IPSS, and WPSS (WHO classification-based prognostic scoring system). MDS treatment is decided according to the risk classification. The goal of treatment in low-risk MDS is to improve cytopenia, reduce transfusion needs, improve quality of life, prolong overall survival, and maybe reduce the risk of progression to leukemia. In the near future, combining both genomics-based, ex vivo functional based and molecular stratification analysis will lead the way to a personalized and targeted approach.

EHA Guidelines on Management of Antithrombotic Treatments in Thrombocytopenic Patients With Cancer

In cancer patients, thrombocytopenia can result from bone marrow infiltration or from anticancer medications and represents an important limitation for the use of antithrombotic treatments, including anticoagulant, antiplatelet, and fibrinolytic agents. These drugs are often required for prevention or treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis or for cardioembolic prevention in atrial fibrillation in an increasingly older cancer population. Data indicate that cancer remains an independent risk factor for thrombosis even in case of thrombocytopenia, since mild-to-moderate thrombocytopenia does not protect against arterial or venous thrombosis. In addition, cancer patients are at increased risk of antithrombotic drug-associated bleeding, further complicated by thrombocytopenia and acquired hemostatic defects. Furthermore, some anticancer treatments are associated with increased thrombotic risk and may generate interactions affecting the effectiveness or safety of antithrombotic drugs. In this complex scenario, the European Hematology Association in collaboration with the European Society of Cardiology has produced this scientific document to provide a clinical practice guideline to help clinicians in the management of patients with cancer and thrombocytopenia. The Guidelines focus on adult patients with active cancer and a clear indication for anticoagulation, single or dual antiplatelet therapy, their combination, or reperfusion therapy, who have concurrent thrombocytopenia because of either malignancy or anticancer medications. The level of evidence and the strength of the recommendations were discussed according to a Delphi procedure and graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

New Approaches to Myelodysplastic Syndrome Treatment

OPINION STATEMENT

The treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) begins with risk stratification using a validated tool such as the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) or its revised version (IPSS-R). This divides patients into lower- and higher- risk categories. Although treatment objectives in lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) have traditionally been directed at improving cytopenias (usually anemia) as well as quality of life, recent data supports a potential role for early intervention in delaying transfusion dependency. In addition, careful individualized risk stratification incorporating clinical, cytogenetic, and mutational data might help identify patients at higher-than-expected risk for progression. Given the need for supportive care with red blood cell (RBC) transfusions leading to iron overload, iron chelation should be considered for patients with heavy transfusion requirements at risk for end-organ complications. For patients with LR-MDS and isolated anemia, no high-risk features, and endogenous erythropoietin (EPO) levels below 500 U/L, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) can be attempted to improve anemia. Some LR-MDS patient subgroups may also benefit from specific therapies including luspatercept (MDS with ring sideroblasts), lenalidomide (MDS with deletion 5q), or immunosuppressive therapy (hypocellular MDS). LR-MDS patients failing the above options, or those with multiple cytopenias and/or higher-risk features, can be considered for oral low-dose hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapy. Alternatively, these patients may be enrolled on a clinical trial with promising agents targeting the transforming-growth factor beta (TGF-β) pathway, the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) pathway, telomerase activity, inflammatory signaling, or the splicing machinery. In higher-risk MDS (HR-MDS), therapy seeks to modify the natural history of the disease and prolong survival. Eligible patients should be considered for curative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). Despite promising novel combinations, the HMAs azacitidine (AZA) or decitabine (DAC) are still the standard of care for these patients, with intensive chemotherapy-based approaches being a potential option in a small subset of patients. Individuals who fail to respond or progress after HMA experience dismal outcomes and represent a major unmet clinical need. Such patients should be treated as part of a clinical trial if possible. Experimental agents to consider include venetoclax, myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL-1) inhibitors, eprenetapopt, CPX-351, immunotherapies (directed towards CD47, TIM3, or CD70), interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) inhibitors, pevonedistat, seclidemstat, and eltanexor. In this review, we extensively discuss the current landscape of experimental therapies for both LR- and HR-MDS.

Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin Accelerates the Recovery of Platelet in Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Aim

The effect of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) is largely unknown in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS). This study aimed at investigating the safety and efficacy of rhTPO in patients with LR-MDS.

Methods

LR-MDS patients receiving stanozolol (2 mg, t.i.d.) and supportive care alone (non-rhTPO) or additional rhTPO were enrolled in this study prospectively. rhTPO was given at 15,000 U (q.d.) for 7 days/month for at least 3 months. Patients stopped rhTPO if the platelet count was higher than 50 × 10⁹/L or had no effects after 3 months of treatment. The overall response (OR), complete response (CR), platelet response, side effects, clone evolution, and clinical outcome were evaluated.

Result

Thirty-five patients were enrolled: 20 (57.1%) patients in the rhTPO group and 15 (42.9%) patients in the non-rhTPO group. The demographic and baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. Platelet response was higher at 1 and 2 months as compared with that in the non-rhTPO group (p = 0.006 and p = 0.001, respectively). Meanwhile, the rhTPO group had a shorter time to achieve a platelet transfusion-free state compared with the non-rhTPO group (p = 0.034). Hematologic response was higher at 1 and 2 months compared with that in the non-rhTPO group (p = 0.006 and p = 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the overall response or complete response at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months between the two groups. One patient in the rhTPO group evolved into higher-risk MDS at 9 months. No significant difference in disease progression, infection, gastrointestinal disorders, or drug-related liver/renal injuries was found between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Adding short-term rhTPO can accelerate the early platelet response and decrease platelet transfusion, with no obvious side effects.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04324060?cond=NCT04324060&draw=2, identifier NCT04324060

Sequential Use of Romiplostim after Eltrombopag for Refractory Thrombocytopenia in Hydrocarbon-Induced Myelodysplasia

We describe the clinical course of a 65-year-old male patient who suffered from hydrocarbon-induced myelodysplasia and was successfully treated with the thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA), romiplostim. Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, cytopenias, and increased risk of leukemic transformation. Here, we present a clinical vignette of MDS-associated thrombocytopenia refractory to first-line drugs as well as the TPO-RA, eltrombopag. To date, romiplostim is an U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and thrombocytopenia secondary to liver disease. Of note, currently the FDA advises against its use in MDS based on previous long-term safety concerns. Since the therapeutic options for thrombocytopenia in MDS patients are sparse, repurposing and reassessing romiplostim in this setting have been the focus of recent studies. At the time of writing, no published double-blind randomized clinical trials have conducted a head-to-head comparison between romiplostim and eltrombopag in thrombocytopenic MDS patients. To the best of our knowledge, for a thrombocytopenic patient in the setting of MDS, this is the first documented report of refractory clinical response after a 2-year use of eltrombopag in which replacement of treatment with romiplostim resulted in sustained physiological counts of thrombocytes within four weeks.

Biology and clinical management of hypoplastic MDS: MDS as a bone marrow failure syndrome

Hypoplastic MDS is a subset of MDS characterized by marrow hypocellularity diagnosed in 10-15% of MDS patients. The pathogenesis of this disease shares features of aplastic anemia with activation of the effector T cells against hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and high-risk MDS with acquisition of somatic mutations that provide survival and growth advantage of these cells in the inflammatory bone marrow microenvironment. Clonal evolution in hypoplastic MDS may be associated with accumulation of DNA damage and progression to AML while clonal hematopoiesis in aplastic anemia is strongly related to immune escape of the hematopoietic cells. Distinction of hypoplastic MDS from other acquired and inherited bone marrow failure syndromes is frequently challenging but it is critical for the appropriate clinical management of the patients. Treatment with immunosuppression is an important component of the clinical approach to patients with hypoplastic MDS while hypomethylating agents and early allogeneic bone marrow transplantation are also considerations in some patients. In this review, we summarize the current literature on the biology of hypoplastic MDS, the differences between this disease and other bone marrow failure syndromes, and the treatment algorithm for patients with this subtype of MDS.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists for marrow failure: A concise clinical review

Bone marrow failure is characterized by a disruption of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) homeostasis and function, which causes decreased blood counts. Germline and somatic mutations within HSCs and immune dysregulation contribute to the pathogenesis of marrow failure. Allogeneic HSC transplant is a potentially curative therapy for marrow failure, although not all patients are candidates for this procedure. Immune suppressive therapy (IST) is an effective treatment for patients with aplastic anemia (AA) and select patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, but some patients fail to respond or relapse after IST. Over the past decade, the oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist eltrombopag has become a therapeutic option for AA in combination with frontline IST, and as a single agent for relapsed and refractory patients after IST. In this review, we highlight current knowledge of thrombopoietin receptor agonist mechanisms of action, and clinical indications and toxicities in patients with marrow failure, including the risk of clonal evolution.

Management of the Older Patient with Myelodysplastic Syndrome

No two diagnoses of myelodysplastic syndrome are genuinely alike, owing to differing and dynamic mutational topography and epigenetic aberrancy. Consequently, no two patients with myelodysplastic syndrome are identical and disease-specific and patient-specific factors are considered in formulating the optimal treatment, which includes few that are disease modifying. Age itself should not be an absolute contraindication to therapy, including intensive therapy such as allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which is the only curative therapy. However, age associates with an increased prevalence of frailty and comorbidities that must be considered and may preclude a path to cure. Palliative therapies are the mainstay for many patients with myelodysplastic syndrome, which is a disease of older adults with the majority of patients diagnosed at age ≥ 75 years. The older patient requires heightened attention to end organ function/reserve and drug-drug interactions as well as insurance, income, cost, and socioeconomic and psychosocial issues that influence management. Many prior studies have included relatively younger populations or have not specifically performed high-quality subgroup analyses of older patients. In this review, we discuss the available standard-of-care therapies for myelodysplastic syndrome as they specifically relate to the older population and assess the emerging therapeutics that may further the pursuit for personalized treatment and improve both the outcomes and quality of life of the older patient with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the Postgenomic Era and Future Perspectives for Precision Medicine

Simple Summary

With demographic ageing, improved cancer survivorship and increased diagnostic sensitivity, incident cases of patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) are continuously rising, leading to a relevant impact on health care resources. Disease heterogeneity and various comorbidities are challenges for the management of the generally elderly patients. Therefore, experienced physicians and multidisciplinary teams should be involved in the establishment of the correct diagnosis, risk-assessment and personalized treatment plan. Next-generation sequencing allows for early detection of clonal hematopoiesis and monitoring of clonal evolution, but also poses new challenges for its appropriate use. At present, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative treatment option for a minority of fit MDS patients. All others receive palliative treatment and will eventually progress, having an unmet need for novel therapies. Targeting compounds are in prospect for precision medicine, however, abrogation of clonal evolution to acute myeloid leukemia remains actually out of reach.

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a heterogeneous group of clonal disorders caused by sequential accumulation of somatic driver mutations in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). MDS is characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis with cytopenia, dysplasia, inflammation, and a variable risk of transformation into secondary acute myeloid leukemia. The advent of next-generation sequencing has revolutionized our understanding of the genetic basis of the disease. Nevertheless, the biology of clonal evolution remains poorly understood, and the stochastic genetic drift with sequential accumulation of genetic hits in HSPCs is individual, highly dynamic and hardly predictable. These continuously moving genetic targets pose substantial challenges for the implementation of precision medicine, which aims to maximize efficacy with minimal toxicity of treatments. In the current postgenomic era, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative option for younger and fit MDS patients. For all unfit patients, regeneration of HSPCs stays out of reach and all available therapies remain palliative, which will eventually lead to refractoriness and progression. In this review, we summarize the recent advances in our understanding of MDS pathophysiology and its impact on diagnosis, risk-assessment and disease monitoring. Moreover, we present ongoing clinical trials with targeting compounds and highlight future perspectives for precision medicine.

Eltrombopag for myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia with no excess blasts and thrombocytopenia: a French multicentre retrospective real-life study

Despite a moderate prevalence in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML), thrombocytopenia remains a risk of severe bleeding and therapeutic options are still limited. There are only a few studies with eltrombopag (ELT), a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, in those patients. In this retrospective multicentre study, ELT was used in 50 patients with MDS and 11 with CMML, with no excess of marrow blasts and platelet counts of <50 × 10⁹ /l in a 'real-life' situation. Platelet response occurred in 47 (77%) patients. The median (range) duration of response was 8 (0-69) months. None of the eight still responders who discontinued ELT had relapsed, at a median (range) of 16 (6-23) months after ELT discontinuation. Although 36% of the patients were anti-coagulated or anti-aggregated only 10% of patients had Grade ≥3 bleeding events. Thrombotic events were observed in six (10%) patients, who all but one had a medical history of arterial or venous thrombosis. Progression to acute myeloid leukaemia occurred in four (7%) patients. In this first 'real-life' study, ELT was effective and generally well tolerated in patients with MDS/CMML without excess blasts.

A Review of Romiplostim Mechanism of Action and Clinical Applicability

Thrombocytopenia results from a variety of conditions, including radiation, chemotherapy, autoimmune disease, bone marrow disorders, pathologic conditions associated with surgical procedures, hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), and hematologic disorders associated with severe aplastic anemia. Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is caused by immune reactions that accelerate destruction and reduce production of platelets. Thrombopoietin (TPO) is a critical component of platelet production pathways, and TPO receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are important for the management of ITP by increasing platelet production and reducing the need for other treatments. Romiplostim is a TPO-RA approved for use in patients with ITP in the United States, European Union, Australia, and several countries in Africa and Asia, as well as for use in patients with refractory aplastic anemia in Japan and Korea. Romiplostim binds to and activates the TPO receptor on megakaryocyte precursors, thus promoting cell proliferation and viability, resulting in increased platelet production. Through this mechanism, romiplostim reduces the need for other treatments and decreases bleeding events in patients with thrombocytopenia. In addition to its efficacy in ITP, studies have shown that romiplostim is effective in improving platelet counts in various settings, thereby highlighting the versatility of romiplostim. The efficacy of romiplostim in such disorders is currently under investigation. Here, we review the structure, mechanism, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of romiplostim. We also summarize the clinical evidence supporting its use in ITP and other disorders that involve thrombocytopenia, including chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia, aplastic anemia, acute radiation syndrome, perisurgical thrombocytopenia, post-HSCT thrombocytopenia, and liver disease.

Eltrombopag for enhancement of platelet engraftment in patients undergoing allogeneic cord blood transplantation

Platelet recovery after allogeneic umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation is delayed compared to other graft sources. We conducted a multicenter phase 2a study to explore whether eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin-receptor agonist, would enhance platelet recovery after UCB transplantation. Between 02/2013 and 07/2016, 12 (10 adults, 2 children) individuals (median age 50; range 6-74 years) with hematological malignancies in complete remission were enrolled. Eltrombopag was given for a median of 76 (range 15-175) days and was safe even at doses of 300 mg/day. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 23 (range 16-40) days. Median time to platelets >20,000/µl and >50,000/µl was 55 (range 25-199) and 66 (range 31-230) days, respectively. A historical cohort comparison did not reveal an advantage for eltrombopag. In conclusion, in the present study eltrombopag seems safe. Based on our limited data, it seems unlikely that eltrombopag could enhance platelet engraftment after UCB transplantation.

Eligibility for clinical trials is unsatisfactory for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, even at a tertiary referral center

Participation in clinical trials may allow patients with MDS to gain access to therapies not otherwise available. However, access is limited by strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, reflecting academic or regulatory questions addressed by the respective studies. We performed a simulation in order to estimate the average proportion of MDS patients eligible for participation in a clinical trial. The simulation drew upon 1809 patients in the Düsseldorf MDS Registry whose clinical data allowed eligibility screening for a wide range of clinical trials. This cohort was assumed to be alive and available for study participation. The simulation also posited that all MDS trials (n = 47) conducted in our center between 1987 and 2016 were open for recruitment. In addition, study activities in the year 2016 were analyzed to determine the proportion of patients eligible for at least one of the 9 MDS trials open at that time. On average, each clinical trial was suitable for about 18 % of patients in the simulation cohort. Conversely, 34 % of the patients were eligible for at least one of the 9 clinical studies in 2016. Inclusion/exclusion criteria of studies initiated by the pharmaceutical industry excluded more than twice the fraction of patients compared with investigator initiated trials (potential inclusion of 10 % vs. 21 %, respectively). Karyotype (average exclusion rate 58 %), comorbidities (40 %), and prior therapies (55 %) were the main reasons for exclusion. We suggest that in- and exclusion criteria should be less restrictive, in order to meet the needs of the real-life population of elderly MDS patients.

Clinical spectrum, outcome and management of immune thrombocytopenia associated with myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are associated with systemic inflammatory or autoimmune diseases in 10-20 % of cases. Among them, immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) has been reported but large studies assessing this association are missing. Whether such patients have a particular phenotype and require particular management is unclear. This study analyzes the clinical spectrum, outcome and therapeutic management of patients with ITP associated with MDS or CMML, in comparison (i) to patients with primary ITP without MDS/CMML and (ii) to patients with MDS/CMML without ITP. Forty-one MDS/CMML-associated ITP patients were included, with chronic ITP in 26 (63%) patients, low-risk myelodysplasia in 30 (73%) patients and CMML in 24 (59%) patients. An associated autoimmune disease was noted in 10 (24%) patients. In comparison to primary ITP patients, MDS/CMML-associated ITP patients had a higher occurrence of severe bleeding despite similar platelet counts at diagnosis. First-line treatment consisted of glucocorticoids (98%) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) (56%). Response achievement with IVIg was more frequent in primary ITP than in MDS/CMML-associated ITP patients. Response rates to second-line therapies were not statistically different between primary ITP and MDS/CMMLassociated ITP patients. Ten percent (n=4) of patients with MDS/CMML-associated ITP had multirefractory ITP versus none in primary ITP controls. After a median follow-up of 60 months, there was no difference in overall survival between MDS/CMML-associated ITP and primary ITP patients. Leukemia-free-survival was significantly better in MDS/CMMLassociated ITP patients than in MDS/CMML without ITP MDS/CMML-associated ITP have a particular outcome with more severe bleeding and multirefractory profile than primary ITP, similar response profile to primary ITP therapy except for IVIg, and less progression toward acute myeloid leukemia than MDS/CMML without ITP.

Challenges and Advances in Managing Thrombocytopenic Cancer Patients

Cancer patients have varying incidence, depth and duration of thrombocytopenia. The mainstay of managing severe chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) in cancer is the use of platelet transfusions. While prophylactic platelet transfusions reduce the bleeding rate, multiple unmet needs remain, such as high residual rates of bleeding, and anticancer treatment dose reductions/delays. Accordingly, the following promising results in other settings, antifibrinolytic drugs have been evaluated for prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors. In addition, Thrombopoeitin receptor agonists have been studied for two major implications in cancer: treatment of severe thrombocytopenia associated with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia; primary and secondary prevention of CIT in solid tumors in order to maintain dose density and intensity of anti-cancer treatment. Furthermore, thrombocytopenic cancer patients are often prescribed antithrombotic medication for indications arising prior or post cancer diagnosis. Balancing the bleeding and thrombotic risks in such patients represents a unique clinical challenge. This review focuses upon non-transfusion-based approaches to managing thrombocytopenia and the associated bleeding risk in cancer, and also addresses the management of antithrombotic therapy in thrombocytopenic cancer patients.

Current and emerging strategies for management of myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis with varying degrees of dysplasia and peripheral cytopenias. MDS are driven by structural chromosomal alterations and somatic mutations in neoplastic myeloid cells, which are supported by a tumorigenic and a proinflammatory marrow microenvironment. Current treatment strategies for lower-risk MDS focus on improving quality of life and cytopenias, while prolonging survival and delaying disease progression is the focus for higher-risk MDS. Several promising drugs are in the horizon, including the hypoxia-inducible factor stabilizer roxadustat, telomerase inhibitor imetelstat, oral hypomethylating agents (CC-486), TP53 modulators (APR-246 and ALRN-6924), and the anti-CD47 antibody magrolimab. Targeted therapies approved for acute myeloid leukemia treatment, such as isocitrate dehdyrogenase inhibitors and venetoclax, are also being studied for use in MDS. In this review, we provide a brief overview of pathogenesis and current treatment strategies in MDS followed by a discussion of newer agents that are under clinical investigation.

Survey on Recommended Health Care for Adult Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes Identifies Areas for Improvement

The impact on health care of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is continuously rising. To investigate the perception of hemato-oncologists concerning the recommended MDS patient care in Switzerland, we conducted a web-based survey on diagnosis, risk-stratification and treatment. 43/309 physicians (13.9%) replied to 135 questions that were based on current guidelines between 3/2017 and 2/2018. Only questions with feedback-rates >50% were further analysed and ratios >90% defined “high agreement”, 70–90% “agreement”, 30–70% “insufficient agreement” and <30% “disagreement”. For diagnosis, we found insufficient agreement on using flow-cytometry, classifying MDS precursor conditions, performing treatment response assessment after hypomethylating agents (HMA) and evaluating patients with suspected germ-line predisposition. For risk-stratification, we identified agreement on using IPSS-R but insufficient agreement for IPSS and patient-based assessments. For treatment, we observed disagreement on performing primary infectious prophylaxis in neutropenia but agreement on using only darbepoetin alfa in anaemic, lower-risk MDS patients. For thrombopoietin receptor agonists, insufficient agreement was found for the indication, preferred agent and triggering platelet count. Insufficient agreement was also found for immunosuppressive treatment in hypoplastic MDS and HMA dose adjustments. In conclusion, we identified areas for improvement in MDS patient care, in need of further clinical trials, information, and guiding documents.

Therapy for lower-risk MDS

Lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are characterized by the presence of dysplasia, low bone marrow blast percentage, low number and depth of cytopenia(s), and relatively good-risk karyotpic and molecular abnormalities. A score of ≤3.5 on the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System classifies patients as lower-risk MDS. Information from a mutational profile of the MDS at time of diagnosis (and over serial time points) can be reassuring for predicted behavior of lower-risk MDS compared with one expected to progress more rapidly (higher-risk MDS). Supportive care continues to be the crux of treatment, although the options to reduce transfusion needs have improved in 2020. Erythropoiesis stimulating agents, lenalidomide, and luspatercept address the most frequent (and symptomatic) cytopenia (anemia) and are started only when patients are transfusion dependent. Patients can derive long-term benefits (years) from these approaches but will often progress to higher-risk MDS. Interestingly, some patients with lower-risk MDS can present with an isolated thrombocytopenia for which thrombopoietin receptor analogs such as romiplostim and eltrombopag are options (as long as blast counts are low). The presence of pancytopenia and or intensifying and unremitting clinical symptoms are often treated with hypomethylating agents or (anti-thymocyte globulin if hypocellular MDS is of concern). Targeted therapies are emerging for small subsets of MDS patients with specific somatic mutations (ie, TP53, IDH1/2, FLT3), although currently, there are no approved, mutation-directed medications to treat MDS.

Eltrombopag monotherapy can improve hematopoiesis in patients with low to intermediate risk-1 myelodysplastic syndrome

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of clonal myeloid disorders characterized by low blood counts and a propensity to develop acute myeloid leukemia. The management of lowerrisk (LR) MDS with persistent cytopenias remains suboptimal. Eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin-receptor agonist, can improve platelet counts in LR-MDS and trilineage hematopoiesis in aplastic anemia. We conducted a phase II dose modification study to investigate the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag in LR-MDS. The eltrombopag dose was escalated from 50 mg/day to a maximum of 150 mg/day over a period of 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was hematologic response at 16-20 weeks. Eleven of 25 (44%) patients responded; five and six patients had uni- or bi-lineage hematologic responses, respectively. The predictors of response were presence of a paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clone, marrow hypocellularity, thrombocytopenia, and elevated plasma thrombopoietin levels at study entry. The safety profile was consistent with that found in previous eltrombopag studies in aplastic anemia; no patients discontinued the drug due to adverse events. Three patients developed reversible grade 3 liver toxicity and one patient had increased reticulin fibrosis. Ten patients discontinued eltrombopag after achieving a robust response (median time 16 months); four of them reinitiated eltrombopag because of declining blood counts, and all attained a second robust response. Six patients had disease progression not associated with expansion of mutated clones and no patient progressed to develop acute myeloid leukemia on study. In conclusion, eltrombopag was well-tolerated and effective in restoring hematopoiesis in some patients with low or intermediate-1 risk MDS. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00932156.

Eltrombopag for the Treatment of Severe Inherited Thrombocytopenia

Inherited thrombocytopenias correspond to a group of hereditary disorders characterized by a reduced platelet count, platelet dysfunction, and a family history of thrombocytopenia. It is commonly associated with mucocutaneous bleeding. Thrombocytopenia results from mutations in genes involved in megakaryocyte differentiation, platelet formation, and clearance. Here we report on a patient presenting with severe syndromic inherited thrombocytopenia manifesting as spontaneous mucocutaneous bleeds, requiring frequent platelet transfusions. Thrombocytopenia was explained by the presence of 4 mutations in 3 hematopoietic transcription factor genes: FLI1, RUNX1, and ETV6. The patient was successfully treated with high-dose eltrombopag at 150 mg/day, an orally available non-peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonist. Since the start of treatment 23 months ago, the manifestations of bleeding have resolved, and no platelet transfusions or corticosteroids have been required. The patient has no clinical or laboratory evidence of myeloid malignancy so far.