1
|
Berghuijs KMVT, Kaddas HK, Trujillo G, Rouhani G, Chevrier A, Ose J, Shibata D, Toriola AT, Figueiredo JC, Peoples AR, Li CI, Hardikar S, Siegel EM, Gigic B, Schneider M, Ulrich CM, Kirchhoff AC. Age-related differences in employment, insurance, and financial hardship among colorectal cancer patients: a report from the ColoCare Study. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:1075-1084. [PMID: 36949233 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01362-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Employment and financial hardships are common issues for working-age colorectal cancer patients. We surveyed colorectal cancer survivors to investigate employment, insurance, and financial outcomes by age at diagnosis. METHODS Cross-sectional survey of six ColoCare Study sites regarding employment, insurance, and financial hardship outcomes. Eligible participants were 1 to 5 years from colorectal cancer diagnosis. Diagnosis age (18-49, 50-64, 65+ years) with outcomes of interest were compared using chi-square and t-tests. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regressions were fit to examine association of demographic factors with any material/psychological hardship (yes/no) and the count of hardships. RESULTS N = 202 participants completed the survey (age: 18-49 (n = 42, 20.8%), 50-64 (n = 79, 39.1%), 65+ (n = 81, 40.1%)). Most diagnosed age < 65 worked at diagnosis (18-49: 83%; 50-64: 64%; 65+ : 14%, p < 0.001) and continued working after diagnosis (18-49: 76%; 50-64: 59%; 65+ : 13%; p < 0.001). Participants age 18-49 reported cancer-related difficulties with mental (81.3%) and physical (89%) tasks at work more than those working in the older age groups (45%-61%). In regression models, among those reporting any hardship, the rates of material and psychological hardships were higher among those age 18-64 (Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) range 1.5-2.3 vs. age 65+) and for those with < college (IRR range 1.3-1.6 vs. college +). CONCLUSIONS Younger colorectal cancer patients are more likely to work after a cancer diagnosis and during cancer treatment, but report higher levels of financial hardship than older patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Younger colorectal cancer patients may encounter financial hardship, thus may feel a need to work during and after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heydon K Kaddas
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Gillian Trujillo
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Gazelle Rouhani
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Amy Chevrier
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jennifer Ose
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David Shibata
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Adetunji T Toriola
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jane C Figueiredo
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anita R Peoples
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Sheetal Hardikar
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Erin M Siegel
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Biljana Gigic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia M Ulrich
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Newman H, Hunger SP. Future of Treatment of Adolescents and Young Adults With ALL: A Vision for Collaboration and Equity. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:665-674. [PMID: 37890130 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past several decades, survival of children with ALL has improved dramatically with treatment regimens refined through cooperative group trials. Despite aggressive treatment and iterative therapy changes for adolescents and young adults (AYAs), improvement has not been as promising. Comparisons between pediatric and adult clinical trials have consistently demonstrated superior outcomes for AYAs treated on pediatric ALL protocols, leading to the implementation of pediatric-inspired ALL protocols by several groups worldwide and/or expansion of the age limit of pediatric trials to include the full spectrum of the AYA population. Despite these efforts, AYAs in both pediatric and adult settings continue to have inferior survival compared with younger children with ALL. Real-world data suggest that uptake of pediatric-style treatment is variable, and even with identical pediatric-style treatment, AYAs still fare worse than younger children. As we enter an era of immunotherapy and precision medicine for newly diagnosed ALL, now is an opportune time to consider how best to approach future therapy for AYA patients. Comparisons of pediatric and adult treatment approaches and subanalyses of AYA patients will help guide harmonization of treatment. The focus of the next stage of ALL therapy for AYA should not only involve novel treatment approaches but also standardization and optimization of supportive care measures, psychosocial support, adherence interventions, oncofertility treatment, and survivorship care. All these efforts should simultaneously work to address health disparities to ensure that a future of improved outcomes is experienced equitably for all AYA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley Newman
- Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
- Division of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Stephen P Hunger
- Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
- Division of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keegan THM, Abrahão R, Alvarez EM. Survival Trends Among Adolescents and Young Adults Diagnosed With Cancer in the United States: Comparisons With Children and Older Adults. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:630-641. [PMID: 37883740 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although data from 1975 to 1997 revealed a gap in cancer survival improvement in adolescents and young adults (AYAs; 15-39 years) compared with children and older adults, more recent studies have reported improvements in AYA cancer survival overall. The current analysis provides an update of 5-year relative survival and cancer survival trends among AYAs compared with children and older adults. METHODS We obtained data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program for 17 regions to obtain recent (2010-2018) 5-year relative survival estimates by cancer type, stage, sex, and race/ethnicity by age group. In addition, we calculated 5-year relative survival trends during 2000-2014. RESULTS Across 33 common AYA cancers, AYAs and children had high 5-year relative survival (86%) and experienced similar survival improvements over time (average absolute change: AYAs, 0.33%; children 0.36%). Among AYAs, 73% of cancers had improvement in 5-year relative survival since 2000. Despite this overall progress, we identified cancers where survival was worse in AYAs than younger or older patients and cancers that have had either a lack of improvement (osteosarcoma and male breast) or decreases in survival (cervical and female bladder) over time. Furthermore, males had inferior survival to females for all cancers, except Kaposi sarcoma and bladder cancer, and non-Hispanic Black/African American AYAs experienced worse survival than other racial/ethnic groups for many cancers considered in this study. CONCLUSION Future studies should focus on identifying factors affecting survival disparities by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Differences in biology, clinical trial enrollment, delivery of treatment according to clinical guidelines, and supportive and long-term survivorship care may account for the survival disparities we observed and warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa H M Keegan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training (COHORT), University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Renata Abrahão
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training (COHORT), University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Elysia M Alvarez
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Meernik C, Dorfman CS, Zullig LL, Lazard AJ, Fish L, Farnan L, Nichols HB, Oeffinger KC, Akinyemiju T. Health Care Access Barriers and Self-Reported Health Among Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13:112-122. [PMID: 37307018 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Adolescents and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors (15-39 years at diagnosis) are at risk for treatment-related late effects but face barriers in accessing survivorship care. We examined the prevalence of five health care access (HCA) barriers: affordability, accessibility, availability, accommodation, and acceptability. Methods: We identified AYA survivors from the University of North Carolina (UNC) Cancer Survivorship Cohort who completed a baseline questionnaire in 2010-2016. Participants had a history of cancer, were ≥18 years of age, and receiving care at a UNC oncology clinic. The sample was restricted to AYA survivors who were interviewed ≥1 year postdiagnosis. We used modified Poisson regression to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) for the association between HCA barriers and self-reported fair or poor health, adjusted for sociodemographic and cancer characteristics. Results: The sample included 146 AYA survivors who were a median age of 39 at the time of the survey. The majority (71%)-and 92% of non-Hispanic Black survivors-reported at least one HCA barrier, including acceptability (40%), accommodation (38%), or affordability (31%). More than one-quarter of survivors (28%) reported fair or poor health. Affordability barriers (PR: 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-3.18) and acceptability barriers (PR: 1.60, 95% CI: 0.96-2.66) were associated with a higher prevalence of fair/poor health, as were the cumulative effects of multiple HCA dimensions reported as barriers. Conclusions: Barriers across multiple HCA dimensions were prevalent and associated with worse health in AYA survivors. Findings highlight the need to better understand and target specific barriers to care for diverse AYA survivors to improve their long-term health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Meernik
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Caroline S Dorfman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Leah L Zullig
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Allison J Lazard
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laura Fish
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laura Farnan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hazel B Nichols
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin C Oeffinger
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tomi Akinyemiju
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hu X, Yang NN, Fan Q, Yabroff KR, Han X. Health insurance coverage among incident cancer cases from population-based cancer registries in 49 US states, 2010-2019. HEALTH AFFAIRS SCHOLAR 2024; 2:qxad083. [PMID: 38756397 PMCID: PMC10986217 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxad083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
Having health insurance coverage is a strong determinant of cancer care access and survival in the United States. The expansion of Medicaid income eligibility under the Affordable Care Act has increased insurance coverage for working-age adults. Using data from the Cancer Incidence in North America (CiNA) in 2010-2019, we identified 6 432 117 incident cancer cases with known insurance status diagnosed at age 18-64 years from population-based registries of 49 states. Considerable variation in Medicaid coverage and uninsured rate exists across states, especially by Medicaid expansion status. Among expansion states, Medicaid coverage increased from 14.1% in 2010 to 19.9% in 2019, while the Medicaid coverage rate remained lower (range = 11.7% - 12.7%) in non-expansion states. The uninsured rate decreased from 4.9% to 2.1% in expansion states, while in non-expansion states, the uninsured rate decreased slightly from 9.5% to 8.1%. In 2019, 111 393 cancer cases (16.9%) had Medicaid coverage at diagnosis (range = 7.6%-37.9% across states), and 48 357 (4.4%) were uninsured (range = 0.5%-13.2%). These estimates suggest that many patients with cancer may face challenges with care access and continuity, especially following the unwinding of COVID-19 pandemic protections for Medicaid coverage. State cancer prevention and control efforts are needed to mitigate cancer care disparities among vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Hu
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22911, United States
| | - Nuo Nova Yang
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30144, United States
| | - Qinjin Fan
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30144, United States
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30144, United States
| | - Xuesong Han
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30144, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Robert R, Andersen CR, Murphy KM, Granger TA, Scardaville MC, Medina-George SA, Nguyen V, Frieden LM. Factors contributing to financial distress in young adults with cancer: Material resources, health, and workplace. Work 2024; 77:197-209. [PMID: 37638461 DOI: 10.3233/wor-220687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial distress is a primary concern for young adults with cancer. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify material resources, physical and psychological health, and workplace variables that are associated with financial distress in young adult cancer survivors. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted using the Cancer Survivor Employment Needs Survey. Participants were young adults (18-39 years of age) who lived in the United States and had a cancer diagnosis. Multivariable linear regression was used to model relations between financial distress and material resources, physical and psychological health, and workplace variables. RESULTS Participants (N = 214) were mostly non-Hispanic White (78%), female (79%), and had a mean age of 31 years and 4.6 years post-diagnosis. Material resources, physical and psychological health, and workplace variables were all identified as contributing to study participants' financial distress. Among the young adults surveyed, financial distress was prevalent, and an array of problems were associated with financial distress. CONCLUSION Oncology and rehabilitation providers should openly discuss finances with YAs with cancer and guide them to resources that can address their financial, benefits, and vocational needs to ultimately improve quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhonda Robert
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clark R Andersen
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Teresa A Granger
- Department of Educational Studies in Psychology, Research Methodology, and Counseling, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
| | | | | | - Vinh Nguyen
- Texas Institute for Rehabilitation and Research (TIRR) Memorial Hermann, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lex M Frieden
- Texas Institute for Rehabilitation and Research (TIRR) Memorial Hermann, Houston, TX, USA
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thom B, Friedman DN, Aviki EM, Benedict C, Watson SE, Zeitler MS, Chino F. The long-term financial experiences of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:1813-1823. [PMID: 36472761 PMCID: PMC9734817 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01280-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer-related financial hardship can negatively impact financial well-being and may prevent adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors (ages 15-39) from gaining financial independence. This analysis explored the financial experiences following diagnosis with cancer among AYA survivors. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional, anonymous survey of a national sample of AYAs recruited online. The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) and InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale (IFDFW) assessed financial hardship (cancer-related and general, respectively), and respondents reported related financial consequences and financial coping behaviors (both medical and non-medical). RESULTS Two hundred sixty-seven AYA survivors completed the survey (mean 8.3 years from diagnosis). Financial hardship was high: mean COST score was 13.7 (moderate-to-severe financial toxicity); mean IFDFW score was 4.3 (high financial stress). Financial consequences included post-cancer credit score decrease (44%), debt collection contact (39%), spending more than 10% of income on medical expenses (39%), and lacking money for basic necessities (23%). Financial coping behaviors included taking money from savings (55%), taking on credit card debt (45%), putting off major purchases (45%), and borrowing money (42%). In logistic regression models, general financial distress was associated with increased odds of experiencing financial consequences and engaging in both medical- and non-medical-related financial coping behaviors. DISCUSSION AYA survivors face long-term financial hardship after cancer treatment, which impacts multiple domains, including their use of healthcare and their personal finances. Interventions are needed to provide AYAs with tools to navigate financial aspects of the healthcare system; connect them with resources; and create systems-level solutions to address healthcare affordability. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Survivorship care providers, particularly those who interact with AYA survivors, must be attuned to the unique risk for financial hardships facing this population and make efforts to increase access available interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridgette Thom
- Affordability Working Group, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Danielle N Friedman
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emeline M Aviki
- Affordability Working Group, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Catherine Benedict
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Fumiko Chino
- Affordability Working Group, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Unger JM, Xiao H, Vaidya R, LeBlanc M, Hershman DL. Medicaid Expansion of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and Participation of Patients With Medicaid in Cancer Clinical Trials. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:1371-1379. [PMID: 37590003 PMCID: PMC10436183 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Importance The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion resulted in increased use of Medicaid insurance nationwide. However, the association between Medicaid expansion and access to clinical trials has not been examined to date. Objective To examine whether the implementation of ACA Medicaid expansion was associated with increased participation of patients with Medicaid insurance in cancer clinical trials. Design, Setting, and Participants Data for this cohort study of 51 751 patients were from the SWOG Cancer Research Network. All patients aged 18 to 64 years and enrolled in treatment trials with Medicaid or private insurance between April 1, 1992, and February 29, 2020, were included. Interrupted time-series analysis with segmented logistic regression was used. The monthly unemployment rate and presidential administration were adjusted to reflect potential differences in Medicaid use associated with economic conditions and national administrative policies, respectively. Data analysis was conducted between June 22, 2021, and August 5, 2022. Exposure Implementation of Medicaid expansion on January 1, 2014, was the independent exposure variable. Main Outcomes and Measures The number and proportion of patients by insurance type enrolled in cancer clinical trials over time were analyzed. Results Overall, data for 51 751 patients were analyzed. Mean (SD) age was 50.6 (9.8) years, 67.3% of patients were female, 41.1% were younger than 50 years, and 9.1% used Medicaid. A 19% annual increase (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11-1.28; P < .001) was identified in the odds of patients using Medicaid after the ACA Medicaid expansion, resulting in a 52% increase (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.29-1.78; P < .001) compared with what was expected in the number of Medicaid patients enrolled over time. The association was greater in states that adopted Medicaid expansion in 2014 to 2015 (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.15-1.38; P < .001) compared with other states (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.96-1.21; P = .20; P = .04 for interaction). By February 2020, the proportion of patients with Medicaid insurance was 17.8% (95% CI, 15.0%-20.8%; P < .001), whereas the expected proportion had ACA Medicaid expansion not occurred was 6.9% (95% CI, 4.4%-10.3%; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance Findings suggest that implementation of ACA Medicaid expansion was associated with increased participation of patients using Medicaid in cancer clinical trials. Improved participation in clinical trials for Medicaid-insured patients is critical for socioeconomically vulnerable patients seeking access to the newest treatments available in trials and for improving confidence that trial findings apply to patients of all backgrounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M. Unger
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Hong Xiao
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Riha Vaidya
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Michael LeBlanc
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Dawn L. Hershman
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhao J, Han X, Nogueira L, Fedewa SA, Jemal A, Halpern MT, Yabroff KR. Health insurance status and cancer stage at diagnosis and survival in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:542-560. [PMID: 35829644 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous studies using data from the early 2000s demonstrated that patients who were uninsured were more likely to present with late-stage disease and had worse short-term survival after cancer diagnosis in the United States. In this report, the authors provide comprehensive data on the associations of health insurance coverage type with stage at diagnosis and long-term survival in individuals aged 18-64 years who were diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 with 19 common cancers from the National Cancer Database, with survival follow-up through December 31, 2019. Compared with privately insured patients, Medicaid-insured and uninsured patients were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage (III/IV) cancer for all stageable cancers combined and separately. For all stageable cancers combined and for six cancer sites-prostate, colorectal, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, oral cavity, liver, and esophagus-uninsured patients with Stage I disease had worse survival than privately insured patients with Stage II disease. Patients without private insurance coverage had worse short-term and long-term survival at each stage for all cancers combined; patients who were uninsured had worse stage-specific survival for 12 of 17 stageable cancers and had worse survival for leukemia and brain tumors. Expanding access to comprehensive health insurance coverage is crucial for improving access to cancer care and outcomes, including stage at diagnosis and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingxuan Zhao
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Xuesong Han
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Leticia Nogueira
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Stacey A Fedewa
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Michael T Halpern
- National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Smith GL, Banegas MP, Acquati C, Chang S, Chino F, Conti RM, Greenup RA, Kroll JL, Liang MI, Pisu M, Primm KM, Roth ME, Shankaran V, Yabroff KR. Navigating financial toxicity in patients with cancer: A multidisciplinary management approach. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:437-453. [PMID: 35584404 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Approximately one-half of individuals with cancer face personal economic burdens associated with the disease and its treatment, a problem known as financial toxicity (FT). FT more frequently affects socioeconomically vulnerable individuals and leads to subsequent adverse economic and health outcomes. Whereas multilevel systemic factors at the policy, payer, and provider levels drive FT, there are also accompanying intervenable patient-level factors that exacerbate FT in the setting of clinical care delivery. The primary strategy to intervene on FT at the patient level is financial navigation. Financial navigation uses comprehensive assessment of patients' risk factors for FT, guidance toward support resources, and referrals to assist patient financial needs during cancer care. Social workers or nurse navigators most frequently lead financial navigation. Oncologists and clinical provider teams are multidisciplinary partners who can support optimal FT management in the context of their clinical roles. Oncologists and clinical provider teams can proactively assess patient concerns about the financial hardship and employment effects of disease and treatment. They can respond by streamlining clinical treatment and care delivery planning and incorporating FT concerns into comprehensive goals of care discussions and coordinated symptom and psychosocial care. By understanding how age and life stage, socioeconomic, and cultural factors modify FT trajectory, oncologists and multidisciplinary health care teams can be engaged and informative in patient-centered, tailored FT management. The case presentations in this report provide a practical context to summarize authors' recommendations for patient-level FT management, supported by a review of key supporting evidence and a discussion of challenges to mitigating FT in oncology care. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:437-453.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace L Smith
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Matthew P Banegas
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Chiara Acquati
- Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
- Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Shine Chang
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affordability Working Group, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rena M Conti
- Department of Markets, Public Policy, and Law, Boston University School of Business, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel A Greenup
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Juliet L Kroll
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Margaret I Liang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Maria Pisu
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Kristin M Primm
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael E Roth
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Veena Shankaran
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance/University of Washington Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Do D, Peele M. The Affordable Care Act's young adult mandate was associated with a reduction in pain prevalence. Pain 2021; 162:2693-2704. [PMID: 34652321 PMCID: PMC8832999 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Pain is a major health problem among U.S. young adults. The passage of the Affordable Care Act's young adult mandate in 2010 allowed individuals to remain on their parents' health insurance until age 26. Although studies have documented the positive effects of this mandate on various health outcomes, less is known about its association with self-reported pain among young adults. Using the 2002 to 2018 National Health Interview Survey (N = 48,053) and a difference-in-differences approach, we compared the probabilities of reporting pain at 5 sites (low back, joint, neck, headache/migraine, and facial/jaw) and the number of pain sites between mandate eligible (ages 20-25) and ineligible (ages 26-30) adults before and after the mandate. In fully adjusted models, the mandate was associated with a decline of 2 percentage points in the probability of reporting pain at any site (marginal effect, -0.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.05 to -0.002; weighted sample proportion, 0.37) and in the number of pain sites (coefficient, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.11 to -0.01; weighted sample average, 0.62). These results were primarily driven by the association between the mandate and the probability of reporting low back pain (marginal effect, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.05 to -0.01; weighted sample proportion, 0.20). Additional analyses revealed that the mandate was associated with improvements in access to care and reductions in risk factors for pain-including chronic conditions and risky health behaviors. To the extent that the results are generalizable to other health insurance programs, removing financial barriers to medical care may help reduce pain prevalence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duy Do
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto CA, United States
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Morgan Peele
- Population Studies Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Roux A, Beccaria K, Blauwblomme T, Mahlaoui N, Chretien F, Varlet P, Puget S, Pallud J. Toward a transitional care from childhood and adolescence to adulthood in surgical neurooncology? A lesson from the Necker-Enfants Malades and the Sainte-Anne Hospitals collaboration. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2021; 28:380-386. [PMID: 34330092 DOI: 10.3171/2021.3.peds2141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Transitional care in surgical neurooncology is poorly studied. However, this period is pivotal, since it allows the patient to be empowered in his or her disease management. Here, the authors describe the experience of the Necker-Enfants Malades and the Sainte-Anne Hospital collaboration. METHODS The mixed transitional consultations started in September 2019 in a dedicated space for transitional care, named the "La Suite" department, located in the Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France. The authors organized planned consultations to schedule the clinical and radiological follow-up in the adult neurosurgical department but also emergency consultations to manage tumor recurrence in young adult patients. Transitional care was performed jointly by pediatric and adult neurosurgeons who have developed clinical and research skills in the field of surgical neurooncology. Neuropathological analysis was performed by a neuropathologist who is specialized in pediatric and adult neurooncology. RESULTS Fourteen patients benefited from a mixed transitional consultation. All of them accepted to start their management in an adult neurosurgical environment. Eleven patients (78.6%) for whom the disease was controlled benefited from a planned consultation. Three patients (21.4%) required rapid neurosurgical management for a tumor recurrence (n = 2) or for a new primary CNS tumor (n = 1) and benefited from an emergency consultation. CONCLUSIONS For adult patients harboring a brain tumor during childhood or adolescence, the authors suggest that neurosurgeons specialized in adult surgical neurooncology with a full knowledge in pediatric neurooncology will combine the required skills to optimize care management for these patients within a dedicated multidisciplinary organization framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Roux
- 1Service de Neurochirurgie, GHU Paris-Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris.,2Université de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris.,3INSERM UMR 1266, IMA-Brain, Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris
| | - Kévin Beccaria
- 2Université de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris.,4Service de Neurochirurgie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris
| | - Thomas Blauwblomme
- 2Université de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris.,4Service de Neurochirurgie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris
| | - Nizar Mahlaoui
- 5Centre de référence déficits immunitaires héréditaires (Ceredih), Hôpital universitaire Necker-Enfants malades, AP-HP, Paris; Unité d'immuno-hématologie et rhumatologie pédiatrique, Hôpital universitaire Necker-Enfants malades, AP-HP, Paris.,6La Suite, Hôpital universitaire Necker-Enfants malades, AP-HP, Paris; and
| | - Fabrice Chretien
- 2Université de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris.,7Service de Neuropathologie, GHU Paris-Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris, France
| | - Pascale Varlet
- 2Université de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris.,3INSERM UMR 1266, IMA-Brain, Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris.,7Service de Neuropathologie, GHU Paris-Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris, France
| | - Stéphanie Puget
- 2Université de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris.,4Service de Neurochirurgie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris
| | - Johan Pallud
- 1Service de Neurochirurgie, GHU Paris-Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris.,2Université de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris.,3INSERM UMR 1266, IMA-Brain, Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Loftus CJ, Ahn J, Hagedorn JC, Cain M, Holt S, Merguerian P, Shnorhavorian M. The impact of the dependent care provision on individuals with spina bifida transitioning to adulthood. J Pediatr Urol 2021; 17:289.e1-289.e9. [PMID: 33563555 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Under the Affordable Care Act, the Dependent Care Provision (DCP) was enacted in 2010 and expanded healthcare coverage for millions of young adults ages 19-25 by allowing them to stay on their parents' insurance until age 26. It is unknown whether the DCP has impacted young adults with SB who are at risk for lapses in insurance coverage as they transition into adult care. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to determine the impact of the DCP on access to care (insurance status) and healthcare-quality (hospital admissions for potentially preventable conditions). METHODS Using the National Inpatient Sample (an all-payor national dataset of hospital admissions), we analyzed pre/post DCP changes for admissions of SB patients ages 19-25. Our outcomes of interest were rates of insurance coverage and proportion of admissions due to potentially preventable conditions (UTI, pyelonephritis, skin conditions, osteomyelitis, sepsis, and pneumonia). Analysis included a difference-in-differences logistic regression model which compared the pre/post DCP difference (2006-s quarter of 2010 vs. 2011-2013) in patients ages 19-25 to the difference in patients ages 26-32 who were ineligible for the DCP policy. RESULTS For admissions of SB patients ages 19-25, the DCP was not associated with improved insurance status compared to admissions ages 26-32 (0% vs. -0.4%, p = 0.10) and rates of private insurance decreased in both age groups, but more so in ages 26-32 (-2.0% vs. -3.9%, p < 0.001). Private insurance rates increased for admissions of white patients ages 19-25 but not for black and Hispanic groups. An increase in overall insurance status was also seen in young adults from high-income zip codes. Admissions for potentially preventable conditions increased in both age groups by a similar degree (+2.6% vs. +2.5%, p = 0.82). DISCUSSION Under the Affordable Care Act, the DCP failed to improve rates of private insurance or decrease rates of noninsurance for admissions of young adults with SB. Certain race and socioeconomic groups benefited more from this national healthcare policy. Meanwhile, admissions for potentially preventable conditions are common in spina bifida patients, and increased over the study period, suggesting a need for further investigation into optimizing the delivery of healthcare to this complex patient population. CONCLUSION The DCP did not result in improved overall insurance rates or in improved rates of private insurance for admissions of SB patients 18-25 years old.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Loftus
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356510, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| | - Jennifer Ahn
- Department of Urology, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105, United States
| | - Judith C Hagedorn
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356510, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Mark Cain
- Department of Urology, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105, United States
| | - Sarah Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356510, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Paul Merguerian
- Department of Urology, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105, United States
| | - Margarett Shnorhavorian
- Department of Urology, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wolfson JA, Bhatia S, Ginsberg J, Becker LK, Bernstein D, Henk HJ, Lyman GH, Nathan PC, Puccetti D, Wilkes JJ, Winestone LE, Kenzik KM. Expenditures among young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia by site of care. Cancer 2021; 127:1901-1911. [PMID: 33465248 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) between the ages of 22 and 39 years experience worse outcomes than those diagnosed when they are 21 years old or younger. Treatment at National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCC) mitigates these disparities but may be associated with higher expenditures. METHODS Using deidentified administrative claims data (OptumLabs Data Warehouse), the cancer-related expenditures were examined among patients with ALL diagnosed between 2001 and 2014. Multivariable generalized linear model with log-link modeled average monthly health-plan-paid (HPP) expenditures and amount owed by the patient (out-of-pocket [OOP]). Cost ratios were used to calculate excess expenditures (CCC vs non-CCC). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) compared CCC and non-CCC monthly visit rates. Models adjusted for sociodemographics, comorbidities, adverse events, and months enrolled. RESULTS Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were comparable between CCC (n = 160) and non-CCC (n = 139) patients. Higher monthly outpatient expenditures in CCC patients ($15,792 vs $6404; P < .001) were driven by outpatient hospital HPP expenditures. Monthly visit rates and per visit expenditures for nonchemotherapy visits (IRR = 1.6; P = .001; CCC = $8247, non-CCC = $1191) drove higher outpatient hospital expenditures among CCCs. Monthly OOP expenditures were higher at CCCs for outpatient care (P = .02). Inpatient HPP expenditures were significantly higher at CCCs ($25,918 vs $13,881; ꞵ = 0.9; P < .001) before accounting for adverse events but were no longer significant after adjusting for adverse events (ꞵ = 0.4; P = .1). Hospitalizations and length of stay were comparable. CONCLUSIONS Young adults with ALL at CCCs have higher expenditures, likely reflecting differences in facility structure, billing practices, and comprehensive patient care. It would be reasonable to consider CCCs comparable to the oncology care model and incentivize the framework to achieve superior outcomes and long-term cost savings. LAY SUMMARY Health care expenditures in young adults (aged 22-39 years) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are higher among patients at National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCC) than those at non-CCCs. The CCC/non-CCC differences are significant among outpatient expenditures, which are driven by higher rates of outpatient hospital visits and outpatient hospital expenditures per visit at CCCs. Higher expenditures and visit rates of outpatient hospital visits among CCCs may also reflect how facility structure and billing patterns influence spending or comprehensive care. Young adults at CCCs face higher inpatient HPP expenditures; these are driven by serious adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie A Wolfson
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Smita Bhatia
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jill Ginsberg
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | - Gary H Lyman
- Divisions of Public Health Sciences and Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paul C Nathan
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Diane Puccetti
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Jennifer J Wilkes
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cancer and Blood Disorders, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lena E Winestone
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Bone Marrow Transplant, Department of Pediatrics, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospitals, San Francisco, California
| | - Kelly M Kenzik
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Panth N, Barnes J, Sethi RKV, Varvares MA, Osazuwa-Peters N. Socioeconomic and Demographic Variation in Insurance Coverage Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer After the Affordable Care Act. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 145:1144-1149. [PMID: 31670798 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.2724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Importance Health insurance status has a significant association with early diagnosis and stage at presentation, which are the most important predictors of survival among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Literature on the association of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) with changes in insurance status among patients with HNC remains limited. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated changes in insurance rates across sociodemographic subgroups of patients with HNC. Objective To assess the association of the implementation of the ACA with insurance status across socioeconomic and demographic subpopulations of patients with HNC. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective cohort study using data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB), a hospital-based cancer registry (2011-2015) for adults diagnosed with a malignant primary HNC was carried out. The analyses were conducted from November 2018 through December 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures Changes in the percentage of patients with insurance. Results A total of 131 779 patients with HNC were identified in the pre-ACA (77 071) and post-ACA (54 708) periods. Overall, 98 207 (74.5%) participants were men and 33 572 (25.5) were women, with 73 124 (55.5%) being aged between 50 to 64 years. There was a 2.68 percentage point decrease (PPD) (95% CI, 2.93-2.42) in the percentage of patients with HNC without insurance from the pre-ACA to the post-ACA period. Changes in the percentage of uninsured patients varied significantly by age, with the largest reduction in uninsured status among patients with HNC aged 18 to 34 years (5.12 PPD; 95% CI, 3.18-7.06) and the smallest reduction in uninsured among those aged 65 to 74 years (0.24 PPD; 95% CI, 0.03-0.45). There was a significantly greater reduction in uninsured status in low-income zip codes (3.45 PPD; 95% CI, 2.76-4.14) than in high-income zip codes (1.99 PPD; 95% CI, 1.63-2.36). Conclusions and Relevance There was a significant association between ACA implementation and percentage decrease in uninsured patients. Young adults and those residing in low-income zip codes experienced a significantly higher rate of insurance uptake compared with older adults and residents of high-income areas. This suggests that coverage expansions enacted through the ACA are not only associated with increased access to care among the broader HNC population, but that they may also yield a greater benefit among subpopulations with historically limited insurance coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neelima Panth
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Justin Barnes
- St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Rosh K V Sethi
- Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mark A Varvares
- Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Winestone LE, Hochman LL, Sharpe JE, Alvarez E, Becker L, Chow EJ, Reiter JG, Ginsberg JP, Silber JH. Impact of Dependent Coverage Provision of the Affordable Care Act on Insurance Continuity for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 17:e882-e890. [PMID: 33090897 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The 2010 Dependent Coverage Provision (DCP) of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) allowed enrollees to remain on their parents' health insurance until 26 years of age. We compared rates of insurance disenrollment among patients with cancer who were DCP-eligible at age 19 to those who were not eligible at age 19. METHODS Using OptumLabs Data Warehouse, which contains longitudinal, real-world, de-identified administrative claims for commercial enrollees, we examined patients born between 1982 and 1993 and diagnosed with cancer between 2000 and 2015. In the recent cohort, patients who turned 19 in 2010-2012 (DCP-eligible to stay on parents' insurance) were matched to patients who turned 19 in 2007-2009 (not DCP-eligible when turning 19). In an earlier control cohort, patients who turned 19 between 2004 and 2006 (not DCP-eligible) were matched to patients who turned 19 between 2001 and 2003 (not DCP-eligible). Patients were matched on cancer type, diagnosis date, demographics, and treatment characteristics. The time to loss of coverage was estimated using Cox models. Difference-in-difference between the recent and earlier cohorts was also evaluated. RESULTS A total of 2,829 patients who turned 19 years of age in 2010-2012 were matched to patients who turned 19 in 2007-2009. Median time to disenrollment was 26 months for younger patients versus 22 months for older patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.90; P = .001). In 8,978 patients who turned 19 between 2001 and 2006, median time to disenrollment was 20 months among both younger and older patients (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.03; P = .59). The difference between the recent cohort and the earlier control cohort was a 15% greater reduction in coverage loss (P < .0001), favoring those turning 19 after the DCP went into effect. CONCLUSION In the vulnerable population of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors, the ACA may have lowered the insurance dropout rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena E Winestone
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Blood & Marrow Transplant, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Benioff Children's Hospital; and UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Lauren L Hochman
- Center for Outcomes Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James E Sharpe
- Center for Outcomes Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Elysia Alvarez
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA
| | | | - Eric J Chow
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital; and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Joseph G Reiter
- Center for Outcomes Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jill P Ginsberg
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; and Division of Pediatric Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.,Cancer Survivorship Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeffrey H Silber
- Center for Outcomes Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; and Division of Pediatric Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.,Department of Health Care Management, The Wharton School; and Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Is Surgical Resection of the Primary Site Associated with an Improved Overall Survival for Patients with Primary Malignant Bone Tumors Who Have Metastatic Disease at Presentation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478:2284-2295. [PMID: 32667758 PMCID: PMC7491913 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of primary malignant bone tumors in patients with metastatic disease at presentation remains a challenge. Although surgical resection has been a mainstay in the management of nonmetastatic malignant bone tumors, there is a lack of large-scale evidence-based guidance on whether surgery of the primary site/tumor improves overall survival in malignant bone tumors with metastatic disease at presentation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Is surgical resection of the primary tumor associated with improved overall survival in patients with primary malignant bone tumors who have metastatic disease at presentation? (2) What other factors are associated with improved and/or poor overall survival? METHODS The 2004 to 2016 National Cancer Database (NCDB), a national registry containing data from more than 34 million cancer patients in the United States, was queried using International Classification of Diseases, 3rd Edition, topographical codes to identify patients with primary malignant bone tumors of the extremities (C40.0-C40.3, C40.8, and C40.9) and/or pelvis (C41.4). The NCDB was preferred over other national cancer registries (that is, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database) because it includes a specific variable that codes for patients who received additional surgeries at metastatic sites. Patients with malignant bone tumors of the head or skull, trunk, and spinal column were excluded because these patients are not routinely encountered and treated by orthopaedic oncologists. Histologic codes were used to categorize the tumors into the following groups: osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, and Ewing sarcomas. Patients whose tumors were classified as Stage 1, 2, or 3 based on American Joint Commission of Cancer guidelines were excluded. Only patients who presented with metastatic disease were included in the final study sample. The study sample was divided into two distinct groups: those who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor and those who did not receive any operation for the primary tumor. A total of 2288 patients with primary malignant bone tumors (1121 osteosarcomas, 345 chondrosarcomas, and 822 Ewing sarcomas) with metastatic disease at presentation were included, of whom 46% (1053 of 2288) underwent surgical resection of the primary site. Thirty-three percent (348 of 1053) of patients undergoing surgical resection of the primary site also underwent additional resection of metastases. Patients undergoing surgical resection of the primary site typically were younger than 18 years, lived further from a facility, had tumors involving the upper or lower extremity, had a diagnosis of osteosarcoma or chondrosarcoma, and had a greater tumor size and higher tumor grade at presentation. To account for baseline differences within the patient population and to adjust for additional confounding variables, multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess whether undergoing surgical resection of the primary tumor was associated with improved overall survival, after controlling for differences in baseline demographics, tumor characteristics (grade, location, histologic type, and tumor size), and treatment patterns (resection of distant or regional metastatic sites, positive or negative surgical margins, and use of radiation therapy or chemotherapy). Additional sensitivity analyses, stratified by histologic type for osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, and Ewing sarcomas, were used to assess factors associated with overall survival for each tumor type. RESULTS After controlling for differences in baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment patterns, we found that surgical resection of the primary site was associated with reduced overall mortality compared with those who did not have a resection of the primary site (hazard ratio 0.42 [95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.49]; p < 0.001). Among other factors, in the stratified analysis, radiation therapy was associated with improved overall survival for patients with Ewing sarcoma (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.57 to 0.88]; p = 0.002) but not for those with osteosarcoma (HR 1.14 [95% CI 0.91 to 1.43]; p = 0.643) or chondrosarcoma (HR 1.0 [95 % CI 0.78 to 1.50]; p = 0.643). Chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival for those with osteosarcoma (HR 0.50 [95% CI 0.39 to 0.64]; p < 0.001) and those with chondrosarcoma (HR 0.62 [95% CI 0.45 to 0.85]; p = 0.003) but not those with Ewing sarcoma (HR 0.7 [95% CI 0.46 to 1.35]; p = 0.385). CONCLUSIONS Surgical resection of the primary site was associated with an overall survival advantage in patients with primary malignant bone tumors who presented with metastatic disease. Further research, using more detailed data on metastatic sites (such as, size, location, number, and treatment), chemotherapy regimen and location of radiation (primary or metastatic site) is warranted to better understand which patients will have improved overall survival and/or a benefit in the quality of life from resecting their primary malignant tumor if they present with metastatic disease at diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
|
18
|
Weiner AB, Jan S, Jain-Poster K, Ko OS, Desai AS, Kundu SD. Insurance coverage, stage at diagnosis, and time to treatment following dependent coverage and Medicaid expansion for men with testicular cancer. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0238813. [PMID: 32936794 PMCID: PMC7494102 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction We sought to assess the impact of Affordable Care Act Dependent Care Expansion (ACA-DCE), which allowed dependent coverage for adults aged 19–25, and Medicaid expansion on outcomes for men with testicular cancer. Methods Using a US-based cancer registry, we performed adjusted difference-in-difference (DID) analyses comparing outcomes between men aged 19–25 (n = 8,026) and 26–64 (n = 33,303) pre- (2007–2009) and post-ACA-DCE (2011–2016) and between men in states that expanded Medicaid (n = 2,296) to men in those that did not (n = 2,265)pre- (2011–2013) and post-Medicaid expansion (2015–2016). Results In ACA-DCE analysis, rates of uninsurance decreased (DID -5.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.23 to -4.04%, p<0.001) among patients aged 19–25 relative to older patients aged 26–64. There was no significant DID in advanced stage at diagnosis (stage≥II; p = 0.6) or orchiectomy more than 14 days after diagnosis (p = 0.6). For patients who received chemotherapy or radiotherapy as their first course of treatment, treatment greater than 60 days after diagnosis decreased (DID -4.84%, 95% CI -8.22 to -1.45%, p = 0.005) among patients aged 19–25 relative to patients aged 26–64. In Medicaid expansion states, rates of uninsurance decreased (DID -4.20%, 95% CI -7.67 to -0.73%, p = 0.018) while patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy greater than 60 days after diagnosis decreased (DID -8.76, 95% CI -17.13 to -0.38%, p = 0.040) compared to rates in non-expansion states. No significant DIDs were seen for stage (p = 0.8) or time to orchiectomy (p = 0.1). Conclusions Men with testicular cancer had lower uninsurance rates and decreased time to delivery of chemotherapy or radiotherapy following ACA-DCE and Medicaid expansions. Time to orchiectomy and stage at diagnosis did not change following either insurance expansion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam B. Weiner
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Stephen Jan
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Ketan Jain-Poster
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Oliver S. Ko
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Anuj S. Desai
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Shilajit D. Kundu
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Osazuwa-Peters N, Barnes JM, Megwalu U, Adjei Boakye E, Johnston KJ, Gaubatz ME, Johnson KJ, Panth N, Sethi RKV, Varvares MA. State Medicaid expansion status, insurance coverage and stage at diagnosis in head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol 2020; 110:104870. [PMID: 32629408 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Only one in three head and neck cancer (HNC) patients present with early-stage disease. We aimed to quantify associations between state Medicaid expansions and changes in insurance coverage rates and stage at diagnosis of HNC. METHODS Using a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences (DID) approach and data from 26,330 cases included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (2011-2015), we retrospectively examined changes in insurance coverage and stage at diagnosis of adult HNC in states that expanded Medicaid (EXP) versus those that did not (NEXP). RESULTS There was a significant increase in Medicaid coverage in EXP (+1.6 percentage point (PP) versus) vs. NEXP (-1.8 PP) states (3.36 PP, 95% CI = 1.32, 5.41; p = 0.001), and this increase was mostly among residents of low income and education counties. We also observed a reduction in uninsured rates among HNC patients in low income counties (-4.17 PP, 95% CI = -6.84, -1.51; p = 0.002). Overall, early stage diagnosis rates were 28.3% (EXP) vs. 26.7% (NEXP), with significant increases in early stage diagnosis post-Medicaid expansion among young adults, 18-34 years (17.2 PP, 95% CI - 1.34 to 33.1, p = 0.034), females (7.54 PP, 95% CI = 2.00 to 13.10, p = 0.008), unmarried patients (3.83 PP, 95% CI = 0.30-7.35, p = 0.033), and patients with lip cancer (13.5 PP, 95% CI = 2.67-24.3, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS Medicaid expansion is associated with improved insurance coverage rates for HNC patients, particularly those with low income, and increases in early stage diagnoses for young adults and women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
- Saint Louis University Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, USA; Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Justin M Barnes
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Uchechukwu Megwalu
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Eric Adjei Boakye
- Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Department of Population Science and Policy, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Kenton J Johnston
- Saint Louis University College for Public Health and Social Justice, Department of Health Management and Policy, St. Louis, MO, USA; Saint Louis University Center for Health Outcomes Research (SLUCOR), St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | - Neelima Panth
- Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Rosh K V Sethi
- University of Michigan Health System, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mark A Varvares
- Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Otolaryngology, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Keegan THM, Parsons HM, Chen Y, Maguire FB, Morris CR, Parikh-Patel A, Kizer KW, Wun T. Impact of Health Insurance on Stage at Cancer Diagnosis Among Adolescents and Young Adults. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 111:1152-1160. [PMID: 30937440 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Revised: 01/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uninsured adolescents and young adults (AYAs) and those with publicly funded health insurance are more likely to be diagnosed with cancer at later stages. However, prior population-based studies have not distinguished between AYAs who were continuously uninsured from those who gained Medicaid coverage at the time of cancer diagnosis. METHODS AYA patients (ages 15-39 years) with nine common cancers diagnosed from 2005 to 2014 were identified using California Cancer Registry data. This cohort was linked to California Medicaid enrollment files to determine continuous enrollment, discontinuous enrollment, or enrollment at diagnosis, with other types of insurance determined from registry data. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with later stages at diagnosis. RESULTS The majority of 52 774 AYA cancer patients had private or military insurance (67.6%), followed by continuous Medicaid (12.4%), Medicaid at diagnosis (8.5%), discontinuous Medicaid (3.9%), other public insurance (1.6%), no insurance (2.9%), or unknown insurance (3.1%). Of the 13 069 with Medicaid insurance, 50.1% were continuously enrolled. Compared to those who were privately insured, AYAs who enrolled in Medicaid at diagnosis were 2.2-2.5 times more likely to be diagnosed with later stage disease, whereas AYAs discontinuously enrolled were 1.7-1.9 times and AYAs continuously enrolled were 1.4-1.5 times more likely to be diagnosed with later stage disease. Males, those residing in lower socioeconomic neighborhoods, and AYAs of Hispanic or black race and ethnicity (vs non-Hispanic white) were more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage, independent of insurance. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that access to continuous medical insurance is important for decreasing the likelihood of late stage cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhao J, Mao Z, Fedewa SA, Nogueira L, Yabroff KR, Jemal A, Han X. The Affordable Care Act and access to care across the cancer control continuum: A review at 10 years. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70:165-181. [PMID: 32202312 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Lack of health insurance coverage is strongly associated with poor cancer outcomes in the United States. The uninsured are less likely to have access to timely and effective cancer prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, survivorship, and end-of-life care than their counterparts with health insurance coverage. On March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was signed into law, representing the largest change to health care delivery in the United States since the introduction of the Medicare and Medicaid programs in 1965. The primary goals of the ACA are to improve health insurance coverage, the quality of care, and patient outcomes, and to maintain or lower costs by catalyzing changes in the health care delivery system. In this review, we describe the main components of the ACA, including health insurance expansions, coverage reforms, and delivery system reforms, provisions within these components, and their relevance to cancer screening and early detection, care, and outcomes. We then highlight selected, well-designed studies examining the effects of the ACA provisions on coverage, access to cancer care, and disparities throughout the cancer control continuum. Finally, we identify research gaps to inform evaluation of current and emerging health policies related to cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingxuan Zhao
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ziling Mao
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Stacey A Fedewa
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Leticia Nogueira
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Xuesong Han
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Perez GK, Salsman JM, Fladeboe K, Kirchhoff AC, Park ER, Rosenberg AR. Taboo Topics in Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology: Strategies for Managing Challenging but Important Conversations Central to Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivorship. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2020; 40:1-15. [PMID: 32324424 PMCID: PMC7328818 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_279787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
Research on adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer has flourished over the past decade, underscoring the unique medical and psychosocial needs of this vulnerable group. A cancer diagnosis during adolescence and young adulthood intersects with the developmental trajectory of AYAs, derailing critical physical, social, and emotional development. AYAs face these abrupt life changes needing age-appropriate information and resources to offset these challenges. Greater attention is needed to address AYA-specific concerns on reproductive and sexual health, financial security and independence, emotional well-being, social support, and end-of-life care. If these unique needs are unaddressed, this can adversely affect AYAs' health care engagement and overall quality of life, increasing their risk for cancer-related morbidity and early mortality. In particular, health care decisions made during treatment have important implications for AYA patients' future health. Oncology clinicians are well positioned to address AYA patients' concerns by anticipating and addressing the challenges this age group is likely to face. In this paper, we explore several core topics that affect AYAs' quality of life and that can be challenging to address. Starting from the moment of diagnosis, through cancer treatment and post-treatment survivorship, and into end of life, each section highlights critical developmental-centric life domains that are affected by the cancer experience. Specifically, we discuss resources, tools, and strategies to navigate these challenging conversations. Taking a risk-reduction approach that invites two-way communication and facilitates referral to age-appropriate resources would help destigmatize these experiences and, in turn, would support the provision of compassionate and effective age-concordant care to this vulnerable group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giselle K. Perez
- Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - John M. Salsman
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Kaitlyn Fladeboe
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Anne C. Kirchhoff
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Elyse R. Park
- Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Abby R. Rosenberg
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kaddas HK, Pannier ST, Mann K, Waters AR, Salmon S, Tsukamoto T, Warner EL, Fowler B, Lewis MA, Fair DB, Kirchhoff AC. Age-Related Differences in Financial Toxicity and Unmet Resource Needs Among Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2020; 9:105-110. [PMID: 31524556 PMCID: PMC7047093 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Financial toxicity may differ by age at diagnosis between adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. We surveyed 52 AYA cancer patients about unmet needs and financial toxicity using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). We compared outcomes by age at diagnosis (15-25-year olds [n = 25, 48%] vs. 26-39-year olds [n = 27, 52%]). AYAs diagnosed ages 26-39 reported that cancer negatively affected their finances more than 15-25-year olds (77.8% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.0005). Lower mean COST scores among those diagnosed ages 26-39 indicated greater financial toxicity compared to those 15-25 years (18.22 vs. 24.84, p = 0.02). Financial burden appears to be greater for older AYAs with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heydon K. Kaddas
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Samantha T. Pannier
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Karely Mann
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Austin R. Waters
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Sara Salmon
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Echo L. Warner
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Brynn Fowler
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Douglas B. Fair
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Anne C. Kirchhoff
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Meernik C, Kirchhoff AC, Anderson C, Edwards TP, Deal AM, Baggett CD, Kushi LH, Chao CR, Nichols HB. Material and psychological financial hardship related to employment disruption among female adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Cancer 2020; 127:137-148. [PMID: 33043464 PMCID: PMC7736150 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The importance of addressing adverse financial effects of cancer among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is paramount as survival improves. In the current study, the authors examined whether cancer-related employment disruption was associated with financial hardship among female AYA cancer survivors in North Carolina and California. METHODS AYA cancer survivors identified through the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry and the Kaiser Permanente Northern/Southern California tumor registries responded to an online survey. Disrupted employment was defined as reducing hours, taking temporary leave, or stopping work completely because of cancer. Financial hardship was defined as material conditions or psychological distress related to cancer. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to characterize the invited sample and survey respondents. Marginal structural binomial regression models were used to estimate prevalence differences (PDs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS Among 1328 women employed at the time of their diagnosis, women were a median age of 34 years at the time of diagnosis and 7 years from diagnosis at the time of the survey and approximately 32% experienced employment disruption. A substantial percentage reported financial hardship related to material conditions (27%) or psychological distress (50%). In adjusted analyses, women with disrupted employment had a 17% higher burden of material conditions (95% CI, 10%-23%) and an 8% higher burden of psychological distress (95% CI, 1%-16%) compared with those without disruption. CONCLUSIONS Financial hardship related to employment disruption among female AYA cancer survivors can be substantial. Interventions to promote job maintenance and transition back to the workforce after treatment, as well as improved workplace accommodations and benefits, present an opportunity to improve cancer survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Meernik
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- University of Utah Health, Huntsman Cancer Institute
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah
| | | | - Teresa P Edwards
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, H.W. Odum Institute for Research in Social Science
| | - Allison M Deal
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | - Hazel B Nichols
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Penumarthy NL, Goldsby RE, Shiboski SC, Wustrack R, Murphy P, Winestone LE. Insurance impacts survival for children, adolescents, and young adults with bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Med 2019; 9:951-958. [PMID: 31838786 PMCID: PMC6997066 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While racial/ethnic survival disparities have been described in pediatric oncology, the impact of income has not been extensively explored. We analyzed how public insurance influences 5‐year overall survival (OS) in young patients with sarcomas. Methods The University of California San Francisco Cancer Registry was used to identify patients aged 0‐39 diagnosed with bone or soft tissue sarcomas between 2000 and 2015. Low‐income patients were defined as those with no insurance or Medicaid, a means‐tested form of public insurance. Survival curves were computed using the Kaplan‐Meier method and compared using log‐rank tests and Cox models. Causal mediation was used to assess whether the association between public insurance and mortality is mediated by metastatic disease. Results Of 1106 patients, 39% patients were classified as low‐income. Low‐income patients were more likely to be racial/ethnic minorities and to present with metastatic disease (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.35‐2.86). Low‐income patients had significantly worse OS (61% vs 71%). Age at diagnosis and extent of disease at diagnosis were also independent predictors of OS. When stratified by extent of disease, low‐income patients consistently had significantly worse OS (localized: 78% vs 84%, regional: 64% vs 73%, metastatic: 23% vs 30%, respectively). Mediation analysis indicated that metastatic disease at diagnosis mediated 15% of the effect of public insurance on OS. Conclusions Low‐income patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas had decreased OS regardless of disease stage at presentation. The mechanism by which insurance status impacts survival requires additional investigation, but may be through reduced access to care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neela L Penumarthy
- Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Robert E Goldsby
- Division of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephen C Shiboski
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Patricia Murphy
- Division of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lena E Winestone
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Allergy, Immunology, and BMT, Department of Pediatrics, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Segel JE, Jung J. Coverage, Financial Burden, and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act for Patients With Cancer. J Oncol Pract 2019; 15:e1035-e1049. [DOI: 10.1200/jop.19.00138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE: Evidence suggests coverage has improved significantly for patients with cancer, particularly in the lower-income population, after the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Yet no study has examined changes in type of coverage or the resulting effect on spending and financial burden. METHODS: Using 2011 to 2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data, we examine changes in type of coverage, spending, and financial burden among lower-income (< 400% of federal poverty level [FPL]) individuals diagnosed with cancer after the ACA. To better understand the changes, we compare this sample to the lower-income patients without cancer and patients with cancer with a higher income (≥ 400% of FPL). All analyses were conducted in 2018. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, we found a decline in months uninsured (−0.78 months; P = .001) and an increase in months with Medicaid coverage (0.40 months; P = .059) among the lower-income patients with cancer. This change is similar to the lower-income patients without cancer. We found an increase in total expenditures ($3,020; P = .071) but a modest decline in the fraction of family income spent on health (−0.014; P = 0.099), although neither is statistically significant. For the higher income patients with cancer, we observed significant increases in both out-of-pocket premiums and medical financial burden. CONCLUSION: After the ACA, lower-income people diagnosed with cancer experienced significant gains in coverage largely through Medicaid at rates similar to lower-income patients without cancer, but patients with cancer with incomes 400% or greater of FPL faced a higher financial burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel E. Segel
- Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeah Jung
- Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Impact of the affordable care act dependent coverage provision on young adult cancer patient insurance coverage by sociodemographic and economic characteristics. Cancer Causes Control 2019; 31:33-42. [PMID: 31696421 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-019-01246-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of the Affordable Care Act Dependent Care Provision by sociodemographic and economic characteristics in young adult cancer patients. METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 database were queried for young adult cancer cases diagnosed during 2007-2014. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we examined insurance coverage in different subgroups of policy-eligible 19-25 year-olds versus policy-ineligible 27-29 year-olds from the pre- (2007-2009) to post- (2011-2014) Dependent Care Provision period. RESULTS Across subgroups and study populations, insurance coverage increased significantly following the Provision enactment in the policy-eligible versus policy-ineligible group across most subgroups (range in NCDB: 1.83 to 6.38% for low and mid-low education areas, respectively; range in SEER: 1.43 to 6.18 for Non-Hispanic Others and Hispanics, respectively). Heterogenous impacts were observed by sex with a larger impact in males (NCDB: 5.14%, 95% CI 3.59-6.69; SEER: 4.46, 2.12-6.8) than females (NCDB: 2.51%, 95% CI 1.39-3.62; SEER: 2.50, 0.82-4.18). We observed no other statistical evidence for Dependent Care Provision subgroup heterogeneity except for a smaller impact in individuals from low education areas in NCDB. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate a positive Dependent Care Provision impact on insurance coverage in young adults with cancer across subgroups, with evidence for a smaller impact in females relative to males and in low relative to high education areas.
Collapse
|
28
|
Wang N, Bu Q, Yang J, Liu Q, He H, Liu J, Ren X, Lyu J. Insurance status is related to overall survival in patients with small intestine adenocarcinoma: A population-based study. Curr Probl Cancer 2019; 44:100505. [PMID: 31548047 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2019.100505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2019] [Revised: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our goal was to investigate the effect of insurance status on the overall survival (OS) in cases of small intestine adenocarcinoma. METHODS The SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database was used to identify 3822 patients who were diagnosed with small intestine adenocarcinoma between 2007 and 2015. The proportional hazard ASSUMPTION was evaluated by proportional-hazards assumption test and Schoenfeld residual test. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis were performed to evaluate the association between insurance status and OS. RESULTS We found that the insurance status at the time of diagnosis affected OS at the population level, both in those aged <65 and ≥65 years. Cox multivariate analysis of patients aged <65 years revealed that the hazard of death was greater in the Medicaid group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.641, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.299-2.073, P < 0.001] and uninsured group (HR = 1.472, 95% CI = 1.095-1.979, P = 0.010) compared with the insured group, while the OS did not differ significantly between the Medicaid and uninsured groups. Similarly, the hazard of death among patients aged ≥65 years was higher in the Medicaid than the insured group (HR = 1.403, 95% CI = 1.136-1.733, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that patients with small intestine adenocarcinoma with insurance coverage have a significantly better OS than patients who have Medicaid or are uninsured, while the OS does not differ between Medicaid and uninsured patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Wang
- Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China; School of Nursing and Health, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China
| | - Qingting Bu
- Department of Genetics, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jin Yang
- Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China; School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Qingqing Liu
- Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China; School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Hairong He
- Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jie Liu
- School of Nursing and Health, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China
| | - Xuequn Ren
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China; Department of General Surgery, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
| | - Jun Lyu
- Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zheng Z, Han X, Zhao J, Yabroff KR. What can we do to help young cancer survivors minimize financial hardship in the United States? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2019; 19:655-657. [PMID: 31408395 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1656398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyuan Zheng
- Surveillance and Health Services Research Program, American Cancer Society , Atlanta , GA , USA
| | - Xuesong Han
- Surveillance and Health Services Research Program, American Cancer Society , Atlanta , GA , USA
| | - Jingxuan Zhao
- Surveillance and Health Services Research Program, American Cancer Society , Atlanta , GA , USA
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Services Research Program, American Cancer Society , Atlanta , GA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Salsman JM, Bingen K, Barr RD, Freyer DR. Understanding, measuring, and addressing the financial impact of cancer on adolescents and young adults. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27660. [PMID: 30756484 PMCID: PMC6777708 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2018] [Revised: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The financial impact of cancer treatment among adolescents and young adults (AYAs, 15-39 years) is deep and long lasting. Compared with other age groups, because of their life stage, AYAs are particularly vulnerable to the adverse economic effects of cancer treatment, also known as financial toxicity. Clinical manifestations of cancer-related financial toxicity include interrupted work and income loss, accumulated debt, treatment nonadherence, avoidance of medical care, and social isolation. Effective clinical interventions should include efforts to increase financial self-efficacy as well as direct support. Measures that are valid, reliable, multidimensional, and age-appropriate are needed to study and address financial toxicity in the AYA population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M. Salsman
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina,Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center,Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Kristin Bingen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology/Blood and MarrowTransplant, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee,Wisconsin
| | - Ronald D. Barr
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - David R. Freyer
- Children’s CenterforCancerand Blood Diseases,Children’s Hospital LosAngeles, Los Angeles,California,USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California,Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, LosAngeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Barnes JM, Harris JK, Brown DS, King A, Johnson KJ. Impacts of the Affordable Care Act Dependent Coverage Provision on Young Adults With Cancer. Am J Prev Med 2019; 56:716-726. [PMID: 30898535 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Revised: 12/16/2018] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence through 2012 suggests that the 2010 Affordable Care Act Dependent Coverage Provision, extending dependent insurance coverage eligibility to age 26years, increased young adult insurance coverage and decreased cancer diagnosis stage in young adult cancer patients. This study examines Dependent Coverage Provision-associated changes in insurance coverage and diagnosis stage through 2014 in young adult cancer patients. METHODS Using a quasi-experimental study design, analyses were conducted in 2017-2018 using 2007 to 2014 data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 and the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Using difference-in-differences analyses applied to linear probability models, changes in the percentage of policy-eligible individuals aged 19-25years versus ineligible individuals aged 27-29years who were insured (excluding Medicaid) and diagnosed at early (Stages 0 and 1) or late (Stage 4) stages following Dependent Coverage Provision enactment were estimated. RESULTS A total of 36,901 and 92,358 young adults were included from SEER and NCDB. Consistent increases in the percentage insured (SEER: 3.45 percentage points, 95% CI=2.04, 4.87; NCDB: 3.72 percentage points, 95% CI=2.80, 4.64); variable increases in early-stage diagnoses (2.25 percentage points, 95% CI=0.40, 4.10; 0.69 percentage points, 95% CI= -0.65, 2.02); and decreases in late-stage diagnoses (-1.74 percentage points, 95% CI= -3.10, -0.38; -0.58 percentage points, 95% CI= -1.46, 0.30) were observed in young adults aged 19-25 versus 27-29years. CONCLUSIONS These results provide clear evidence for a Dependent Coverage Provision-associated impact on insurance coverage in young adult cancer patients; however, clear impacts on diagnosis stage are less evident.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M Barnes
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jenine K Harris
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Derek S Brown
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Allison King
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Division of Public Health Sciences,Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Pediatrics Hematology/Oncology, St. Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kimberly J Johnson
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Parsons SK, Kumar AJ. Adolescent and young adult cancer care: Financial hardship and continued uncertainty. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27587. [PMID: 30556354 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Revised: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Since 2005, there has been a steady increase in the number of new cancer diagnoses among adolescents and young adults (AYA) in the United States (US), likely due to improved awareness and detection within this age group, as well as the possible contribution of insurance expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. AYAs with cancer remain highly vulnerable financially, a situation that will only worsen with proposed rollbacks in access to and affordability of healthcare. In this review, we will discuss existing aspects of financial hardship and highlight areas of uncertainty, based on the current US political climate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan K Parsons
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pediatrics, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.,Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Reid R. Sacco AYA Cancer Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anita J Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.,Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Reid R. Sacco AYA Cancer Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nogueira LM, Chawla N, Han X, Jemal A, Yabroff KR. Patterns of Coverage Gains Among Young Adult Cancer Patients Following the Affordable Care Act. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2019; 3:pkz001. [PMID: 31360889 PMCID: PMC6649747 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkz001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Revised: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The dependent coverage expansion (DCE) and Medicaid expansions (ME) under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) may differentially affect eligibility for health insurance coverage in young adult cancer patients. Studies examining temporal patterns of coverage changes in young adults following these policies are lacking. We used data from the National Cancer Database 2003–2015 to conduct a quasi-experimental study of cancer patients ages 19–34 years, grouped as DCE-eligible (19- to 25-year-olds) and DCE-ineligible (27- to 34-year-olds). Although private insurance coverage in DCE-eligible cancer patients increased incrementally following DCE implementation (0.5 per quarter; P < .001), an immediate effect on Medicaid coverage gains was observed after ME in all young adult cancer patients (3.01 for DCE-eligible and 1.62 for DCE-ineligible, both P < .001). Therefore, DCE and ME each had statistically significant and distinct effects on insurance coverage gains. Distinct temporal patterns of ACA policies’ impact on insurance coverage gains likely affect patterns of receipt of cancer care. Temporal patterns should be considered when evaluating the impact of health policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leticia M Nogueira
- Correspondence to: Leticia M. Nogueira, PhD, MPH, Surveillance and Health Service Research, American Cancer Society, 250 Williams St, Suite 600, Atlanta, GA 30303 (e-mail: )
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cousineau MR, Kim SE, Hamilton AS, Miller KA, Milam J. Insurance Coverage, and Having a Regular Provider, and Utilization of Cancer Follow-up and Noncancer Health Care Among Childhood Cancer Survivors. INQUIRY : A JOURNAL OF MEDICAL CARE ORGANIZATION, PROVISION AND FINANCING 2019; 56:46958018817996. [PMID: 30791853 PMCID: PMC6362514 DOI: 10.1177/0046958018817996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2017] [Revised: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the role of health insurance coverage on patterns of health care utilization and access to cancer-related follow-up and non-cancer care among childhood cancer survivors (CCS). Cross-sectional survey design was used. Childhood cancer survivors were from 2 large hospitals in Los Angeles County. In all, 235 were identified through the Los Angeles Cancer Surveillance Program, diagnosed between the ages of 5 and 18 in 2000-2007 with any cancer type except Hodgkin lymphoma. At data collection in 2009-2010, participants were between 15 and 25 years old. Study exposure was health insurance coverage (private, public, and uninsured). Main outcomes and measures were respondents' regular source of care for cancer follow-up, noncancer care, and both; and having a cancer follow-up visit, primary care visit, and hospital emergency department visit in the past 2 years. Compared with those with private insurance, the uninsured were less likely to have a regular source for cancer follow-up (odds ratio [OR] = 4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.9-9.4), less likely to have a source for noncancer care (OR = 3.3, 95% CI 1.6-6.9), and less likely to have a source of care for both (OR = 5.3, 95% CI = 2.1-13.5). Furthermore, uninsured CCS were less likely to have made visits to cancer specialists (OR = 4.5, 95% CI = 2.1-9.50) and were less likely to have seen a primary care physician in the past 2 years (OR = 3.9, 95% CI = 1.8-8.2). In addition, those with public (vs private) insurance were less likely to have a regular provider for primary care (OR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.1-5.4) and less likely to have made a primary care visit in the past year (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 2.1-13.5). Uninsured CCS are at risk of not obtaining cancer follow-up care, and those with public (vs. private) insurance have less access to primary care. Policies that ensure continuity of coverage for survivors as they age into adulthood may result in fewer barriers to needed care, which may lead to fewer health problems for CCS in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sue E. Kim
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los
Angeles, USA
| | | | | | - Joel Milam
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los
Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Parsons HM, Penn DC, Li Q, Cress RD, Pollock BH, Malogolowkin MH, Wun T, Keegan TH. Increased clinical trial enrollment among adolescent and young adult cancer patients between 2006 and 2012-2013 in the United States. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27426. [PMID: 30256525 PMCID: PMC6249090 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Revised: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stagnant outcomes for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) 15-39 years of age with cancer are partly attributed to poor enrollment onto clinical trials. Initiatives have focused on increasing accrual, but changes at the population-level are unknown. We examined patterns of clinical trial participation over time in AYA patients with cancer. PROCEDURE We utilized medical record data from AYAs in two population-based National Cancer Institute Patterns of Care Studies identified through the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. Among 3135 AYAs diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and sarcoma, we used multivariate logistic regression to evaluate patient and provider characteristics associated with clinical trial enrollment. Interaction terms evaluated variation in clinical trial enrollment across patient and provider characteristics by year of diagnosis. RESULTS From 2006 to 2012-2013, clinical trial participation increased from 14.8% to 17.9% (P < 0.01). Adjusting for patient and provider characteristics, we found lower clinical trial enrollment among those who were older at diagnosis, diagnosed with NHL vs ALL, treated by adult hematologist/oncologists only (vs pediatric hematologist/oncologists), and of non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity (vs non-Hispanic White) (P < 0.05 for all). Interaction analyses indicate improved clinical trial enrollment from 2006 to 2012-2013 among young adults 25-29 years of age and the uninsured. CONCLUSIONS Although disparities in enrollment onto clinical trials remain for AYAs with cancer, our study identified increasing overall clinical trial participation over time. Further, we identify promising trends in enrollment uptake among AYAs 25-29 years of age and the uninsured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen M. Parsons
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Qian Li
- Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training (COHORT) and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
| | - Rosemary D. Cress
- Public Health Institute, Cancer Registry of Greater California, Sacramento, CA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA
| | - Brad H. Pollock
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA
| | - Marcio H. Malogolowkin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
| | - Ted Wun
- Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training (COHORT) and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
| | - Theresa H.M. Keegan
- Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training (COHORT) and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dean LT, Moss SL, Ransome Y, Frasso-Jaramillo L, Zhang Y, Visvanathan K, Nicholas LH, Schmitz KH. "It still affects our economic situation": long-term economic burden of breast cancer and lymphedema. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:1697-1708. [PMID: 30121786 PMCID: PMC6379148 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4418-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Financial toxicity after breast cancer may be exacerbated by adverse treatment effects, like breast cancer-related lymphedema. As the first study of long-term out-of-pocket costs for breast cancer survivors in the USA with lymphedema, this mixed methods study compares out-of-pocket costs for breast cancer survivors with and without lymphedema. METHODS In 2015, 129 breast cancer survivors from Pennsylvania and New Jersey completed surveys on demographics, economically burdensome events since cancer diagnosis, cancer treatment factors, insurance, and comorbidities; and prospective monthly out-of-pocket cost diaries over 12 months. Forty participants completed in-person semi-structured interviews. GLM regression predicted annual dollar amount estimates. RESULTS 46.5% of participants had lymphedema. Mean age was 63 years (SD = 8). Average time since cancer diagnosis was 12 years (SD = 5). Over 98% had insurance. Annual adjusted health-related out-of-pocket costs excluding productivity losses totaled $2306 compared to $1090 (p = 0.006) for those without lymphedema, or including productivity losses, $3325 compared to $2792 (p = 0.55). Interviews suggested that the cascading nature of economic burden on long-term savings and work opportunities, and insufficiency of insurance to cover lymphedema-related needs drove cost differences. Higher costs delayed retirement, reduced employment, and increased inability to access lymphedema care. CONCLUSIONS Long-term cancer survivors with lymphedema may face up to 112% higher out-of-pocket costs than those without lymphedema, which influences lymphedema management, and has lasting impact on savings and productivity. Findings reinforce the need for actions at policy, provider, and individual patient levels, to reduce lymphedema costs. Future work should explore patient-driven recommendations to reduce economic burden after cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorraine T. Dean
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 N Wolfe St, E6650, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA ,Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Shadiya L. Moss
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY USA
| | - Yusuf Ransome
- Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Livia Frasso-Jaramillo
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Yuehan Zhang
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Kala Visvanathan
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 N Wolfe St, E6650, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA ,Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Lauren Hersch Nicholas
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA ,Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Kathryn H. Schmitz
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Keegan THM, Parsons HM. Adolescent angst: enrollment on clinical trials. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2018; 2018:154-160. [PMID: 30504304 PMCID: PMC6246006 DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Survival among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) ages 15 to 39 with cancer has not improved to the same extent as that of pediatric and older adult cancer patients, which is thought to relate, in part, to the lower participation of AYAs in clinical trials. Because significant efforts have been made to improve clinical trial enrollment for AYAs, we (1) present contemporary clinical trial enrollment rates by cancer type, sociodemographic characteristics, and treatment setting and (2) discuss provider-, patient-, and system-level barriers to clinical trial participation. Contemporary studies examining clinical trial enrollment among AYAs have continued to find low overall participation relative to pediatric populations, with most studies observing no significant improvements in enrollment over time. In addition to age and cancer type, enrollment varies by treatment setting, health insurance, and race/ethnicity. Access to available clinical trials may be increased by appropriate referral of AYAs to pediatric and adult specialty cancer centers with studies relevant to the AYA population because most AYAs are treated in the community setting. Even with similar access to trials, however, AYAs may be less likely to participate, and therefore, future efforts should focus on better understanding and addressing barriers to enrollment as well as improving education and outreach regarding clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa H M Keegan
- Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA; and
| | - Helen M Parsons
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Increased Cancer Screening for Low-income Adults Under the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion. Med Care 2018; 56:944-949. [DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
39
|
|
40
|
Han X, Zhao J, Ruddy KJ, Lin CC, Sineshaw HM, Jemal A. The impact of dependent coverage expansion under the Affordable Care Act on time to breast cancer treatment among young women. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0198771. [PMID: 29897976 PMCID: PMC5999229 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer in young women tends to be more aggressive, but timely treatment may not be always available, particularly to those without health insurance. We aim to examine whether the dependent coverage expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA-DCE) implemented in 2010 was associated with changes in time to treatment among women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. METHODS A total of 7,176 patients diagnosed with early stage breast cancer in 2007-2009 (pre-ACA) and 2011-2013 (post-ACA) were identified from the National Cancer Database. A quasi-experimental design difference-in-differences (DD) approach was used, with patients aged 19-25 (targeted by the policy) considered as the intervention group, and patients aged 26-34 years (not affected by the policy) as the control group. Changes in the following treatment outcomes were examined: time from diagnosis to surgery, time from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy, and time from adjuvant chemotherapy to radiation. RESULTS Compared with the control group of patients aged 26-34, young patients aged 19-25 experienced a statistically nonsignificant decrease of 2.7 percentage points (95% CI [-1.2, 6.5]) in the uninsured rate. This did not translate into more reduction in delays to surgery (DD = 2.7 days, 95% CI [-3.2, 8.3]), chemotherapy (DD = -1.0 days, 95% CI [-7.2, 5.2]) or radiation (DD = 5.3 days, 95% CI [-15.6, 26.3]) in the younger cohort than the older cohort. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE No significant changes in time to treatment were found among young women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer after the implementation of the ACA-DCE. Future studies examining impacts of health care policy reform on breast cancer care are warranted to include patients from low-income families and to consider effects from Medicaid expansion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuesong Han
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Jingxuan Zhao
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Kathryn J. Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Chun Chieh Lin
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Helmneh M. Sineshaw
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Nikpay SS, Tebbs MG, Castellanos EH. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion and gains in health insurance coverage and access among cancer survivors. Cancer 2018; 124:2645-2652. [PMID: 29663343 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2017] [Revised: 11/21/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act extends Medicaid coverage to millions of low-income adults, including many survivors of cancer who were unable to purchase affordable health insurance coverage in the individual health insurance market. METHODS Using data from the 2011 to 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, the authors compared changes in coverage and health care access measures for low-income cancer survivors in states that did and did not expand Medicaid. RESULTS The study population of 17,381 individuals included adults aged 18 to 64 years, and was predominantly female, white, and unmarried. The authors found a relative reduction in the uninsured rate of 11.7 percentage points and a relative increase in the probability of having a personal physician of 5.8 percentage points. Stratifying by whether states expanded Medicaid by 2015, the authors found that relative gains in coverage and access were larger among those individuals residing in states with expanded Medicaid compared with those residing in nonexpansion states. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study suggest that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion has improved coverage and access for cancer survivors. Cancer 2018;124:2645-52. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sayeh S Nikpay
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Margaret G Tebbs
- School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Emily H Castellanos
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
A New Lease on Life: Preliminary Needs Assessment for the Development of a Survivorship Program for Young Adult Survivors of Cancer in South Texas. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2018; 40:e154-e158. [PMID: 28991132 PMCID: PMC5866154 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000000990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Priorities for young adult survivorship care from the survivors' perspective are not well documented. To address this within our patient population, we conducted a multimethod needs assessment of young adult survivors of pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancer in South Texas to get a better understanding of the ongoing challenges and priorities for their survivorship needs and related services. Participants were 18 to 39 years at the time of the needs assessment and predominately Hispanic. In an online survey, survivors most commonly cited being concerned about their physical and mental health, long-term treatment effects, recurrence, and health insurance issues. Participants stated that they received critical support from family, friends, and medical staff, but they would like to receive additional support from other cancer survivors through peer mentorship opportunities and survivor retreats/social events.
Collapse
|
43
|
Davidoff AJ, Guy GP, Hu X, Gonzales F, Han X, Zheng Z, Parsons H, Ekwueme DU, Jemal A. Changes in Health Insurance Coverage Associated With the Affordable Care Act Among Adults With and Without a Cancer History: Population-based National Estimates. Med Care 2018; 56:220-227. [PMID: 29438192 PMCID: PMC6105312 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Affordable Care Act (ACA) improved health care coverage accessibility by expanding Medicaid eligibility, creating insurance Marketplaces, and subsidizing premiums. We examine coverage changes associated with ACA implementation, comparing adults with and without a cancer history. METHODS We included nonelderly adults from the 2012 to 2015 National Health Interview Survey. Using information on state Medicaid policies (2013), expansion decisions (2015), family structure, income, insurance offers, and current coverage, we assigned adults in all 4 years to mutually exclusive eligibility categories including: Medicaid-eligible pre-ACA; expansion eligible for Medicaid; and Marketplace premium subsidy eligible. Linear probability regressions estimated pre-post (2012-2013 vs. 2014-2015) coverage changes by eligibility category, stratified by cancer history. RESULTS The uninsured rate for cancer survivors decreased from 12.4% to 7.7% (P<0.001) pre-post ACA implementation. Relative to income >400% of the federal poverty guideline, the uninsured rate for cancer survivors decreased by an adjusted 8.4 percentage points [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-15.6] among pre-ACA Medicaid eligible; 16.7 percentage points (95% CI, 9.0-24.5) among expansion eligible, and 11.3 percentage points (95% CI, -0.8 to 23.5, with a trend P=0.069) for premium subsidy eligible. Decreases in uninsured among expansion-eligible adults without a cancer history [9.7 percentage points (95% CI, 7.4-12.0), were smaller than for cancer survivors (with a trend, P=0.086)]. Despite coverage gains, ∼528,000 cancer survivors and 19.1 million without a cancer history remained uninsured post-ACA, yet over half were eligible for Medicaid or subsidized Marketplace coverage. CONCLUSIONS ACA implementation was associated with large coverage gains in targeted expansion groups, including cancer survivors, but additional progress is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy J. Davidoff
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Gery P. Guy
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
| | - Xin Hu
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Felisa Gonzales
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Xuesong Han
- Surveillance and Health Services Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Zhiyuan Zheng
- Surveillance and Health Services Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Helen Parsons
- Research Data Assistance Center (ResDAC), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Donatus U. Ekwueme
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Surveillance and Health Services Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Brauer ER, Pieters HC, Ganz PA, Landier W, Pavlish C, Heilemann MV. Coming of Age With Cancer: Physical, Social, and Financial Barriers to Independence Among Emerging Adult Survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum 2018; 45:148-158. [PMID: 29466341 PMCID: PMC6162052 DOI: 10.1188/18.onf.148-158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the transition to self-care among a sample of emerging adult cancer survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).
. PARTICIPANTS & SETTING 18 HCT survivors who were aged 18-29 years at the time of HCT for a primary hematologic malignancy and were 8-60 months post-HCT participated in the study. The study took place in the hematology outpatient setting at City of Hope National Medical Center.
. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH The authors conducted in-depth semistructured interviews and analyzed interview transcripts using grounded theory methodology.
. FINDINGS Health-related setbacks following HCT disrupted not only participants' journey toward self-care, but also their overarching developmental trajectory toward adulthood. Physically, participants struggled with lack of personal space around caregivers, but felt unready to live on their own. Socially, they relied on multiple caregivers to avoid relying too much on any one person. Financially, participants worried about prolonged dependence and increased needs in the future.
. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Nurses can support the transition to self-care among emerging adults after HCT by recognizing the broader developmental impact of their cancer experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eden R. Brauer
- UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Center for Cancer Prevention & Control Research, Box 956900, A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900, , Telephone: (310) 724-7525, Fax: (310) 206-3566
| | | | - Patricia A. Ganz
- UCLA Schools of Medicine and Public Health, UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center,
| | - Wendy Landier
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Medicine,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Adolescent and young adult (AYA) individuals with a history of cancer make up a fraction of the total number of cancer survivors in the United States, but they represent a population with needs distinct from either the childhood or the older adult cancer populations. Fertility concerns, psychosocial factors, and health care access are just a few of the distinguishing characteristics. Caring for AYA cancer survivors presents unique opportunities for primary care providers to collaborate with oncology colleagues to minimize the long-term cancer burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Overholser
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Mail Stop B180, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | - Kristin Kilbourn
- Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Colorado Denver, 1200 Larimer Street, NC 5002-M, PO Box 173364, Denver, CO 80017, USA
| | - Arthur Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1665 Aurora Ct, MS F706 Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Alvarez EM, Keegan TH, Johnston EE, Haile R, Sanders L, Wise PH, Saynina O, Chamberlain LJ. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act dependent coverage expansion: Disparities in impact among young adult oncology patients. Cancer 2017; 124:110-117. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2017] [Revised: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elysia M. Alvarez
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology; Stanford University School of Medicine; Palo Alto California
| | - Theresa H. Keegan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology; University of California at Davis School of Medicine; Sacramento California
| | - Emily E. Johnston
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology; Stanford University School of Medicine; Palo Alto California
| | - Robert Haile
- Division of Oncology; Stanford University School of Medicine; Palo Alto California
| | - Lee Sanders
- Division of General Pediatrics; Stanford University School of Medicine; Palo Alto California
| | - Paul H. Wise
- The Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention, Stanford University; Palo Alto California
| | - Olga Saynina
- The Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention, Stanford University; Palo Alto California
| | - Lisa J. Chamberlain
- Division of General Pediatrics; Stanford University School of Medicine; Palo Alto California
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Chen Z, Gao W, Pu L, Zhang L, Han G, Zhu Q, Li X, Wu J, Wang X. Impact of insurance status on the survival of gallbladder cancer patients. Oncotarget 2017; 8:51663-51674. [PMID: 28881677 PMCID: PMC5584278 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Accepted: 05/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The prognostic significance of insurance status has been investigated in many types of malignancies, however, its impact on gallbladder cancer is yet not known. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between insurance status and gallbladder cancer survival. We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset, and identified 1,729 gallbladder cancer cases. Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyze survival outcomes and risk factors. We found that individuals who had non-Medicaid insurance were more likely to be male, older, from wealthier area, and better-educated. Insurance status was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for gallbladder cancer patients. Stratified analysis revealed that the uninsured status independently predicted unfavorable survival outcome at localized tumor stage and in white individuals. To conclude, insurance status is an important predictive factor for gallbladder cancer, and uninsured individuals are at the highest risk of death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiqiang Chen
- Department of Liver Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory on Living Donor Liver Transplantation, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Wen Gao
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Liyong Pu
- Department of Liver Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory on Living Donor Liver Transplantation, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Long Zhang
- Department of Liver Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory on Living Donor Liver Transplantation, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Guoyong Han
- Department of Liver Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory on Living Donor Liver Transplantation, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Qin Zhu
- Department of Liver Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory on Living Donor Liver Transplantation, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Xiangcheng Li
- Department of Liver Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory on Living Donor Liver Transplantation, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jindao Wu
- Department of Liver Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory on Living Donor Liver Transplantation, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Xuehao Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory on Living Donor Liver Transplantation, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
|
49
|
|
50
|
Tumin D, Li SS, Kopp BT, Kirkby SE, Tobias JD, Morgan WJ, Hayes D. The effect of the affordable care act dependent coverage provision on patients with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 2017; 52:458-466. [PMID: 28152283 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.23648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2016] [Revised: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), enacted in 2010, expanded private insurance coverage of young adults through the dependent coverage provision. This policy's implications for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are unknown. METHODS The CF Foundation Patient Registry was used to identify patients seen at CF centers, 3 years before and after ACA implementation. Patients were grouped according to eligibility for the dependent care provision (18-25 years old in 2010) or ineligibility (26-35 years old). Year-level difference-in-difference logistic regressions evaluated the association between ACA enactment and insurance status (private, public, or no insurance). Routine annual care consistent with CF Foundation guidelines (≥4 clinic visits, ≥4 respiratory cultures, and ≥2 pulmonary function tests/year) was a secondary outcome. RESULTS The analysis included 4,024 and 3,132 patients in the eligible and ineligible groups, respectively (35,353 patient-years). In the eligible group, 62% had private insurance before and after ACA; 18% had public insurance before and after ACA; and 5% switched from public to private insurance. In the eligible group, lack of insurance coverage became more common in the post-ACA period (relative risk ratio vs. private insurance [RRR] = 1.95; 95%CI: 1.57, 2.43; P < 0.001). Public insurance coverage also became more common (RRR = 1.50; 95%CI: 1.39, 1.62; P < 0.001). Use of routine care increased post-ACA, but more strongly in the ineligible group than in the eligible group. CONCLUSIONS The ACA dependent coverage provision did not increase private insurance coverage or use of routine care among CF patients who were potentially affected by this policy. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52:458-466. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitry Tumin
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Susan S Li
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.,Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Benjamin T Kopp
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.,Section of Pulmonary Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Stephen E Kirkby
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.,Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.,Section of Pulmonary Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Joseph D Tobias
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.,Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Wayne J Morgan
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Don Hayes
- Section of Pulmonary Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.,Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|