“Suspicious” salivary gland FNA: Risk of malignancy and interinstitutional variability

Second edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: Refining the role of salivary gland FNA

The use of standardised reporting systems for non-gynaecologic cytopathology has made enormous gains in popularity during the past decade, including for thyroid fine-needle aspiration, urine cytology, serous effusions, pancreas, lymph nodes, lung and more. In February 2018, the first edition of the Atlas of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was published. The MSRSGC defines six diagnostic fine-needle aspiration categories encompassing the spectrum of non-neoplastic, benign and malignant lesions of the salivary glands. The goal of the MSRSGC is to combine each diagnostic category with a defined risk of malignancy and a specific clinical and/or surgical management algorithm. Since its initial publication in 2018, more than 200 studies and commentaries have been published, confirming the role of the MSRSGC. The second edition of the MSRSGC, published in July 2023, includes refined risks of malignancy based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a new chapter summarising the use of salivary gland imaging, new advances in ancillary testing and updates in nomenclature.

Second edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: Refining the role of salivary gland FNA

The use of standardized reporting systems for non-gynecologic cytopathology has made enormous gains in popularity during the past decade, including for thyroid fine-needle aspiration, urine cytology, serous effusions, pancreas, lymph nodes, lung, and more. In February 2018, the first edition Atlas of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was published. The MSRSGC defines six diagnostic fine-needle aspiration categories encompassing the spectrum of non-neoplastic, benign, and malignant lesions of the salivary glands. The goal of the MSRSGC is to combine each diagnostic category with a defined risk of malignancy and a specific clinical and/or surgical management algorithm. Since its initial publication in 2018, more than 200 studies and commentaries have been published confirming the role of the MSRSGC. The second edition of the MSRSGC, published in July 2023, includes refined risks of malignancy based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a new chapter summarizing the use of salivary gland imaging, new advances in ancillary testing, and updates in nomenclature.

Salivary gland fine-needle aspiration biopsy: quality assurance results from a tertiary cancer center

INTRODUCTION

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) plays a critical role in the management of patients with salivary gland lesions. A specific diagnosis can be difficult due to the wide range of lesions with overlapping morphologic features, potentially leading to interpretation errors. We analyzed the cytologic-histologic discrepancies identified in the quality assurance program of a major cancer center in cases of salivary gland FNAB and performed a root cause analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Salivary gland FNAB specimens performed during a 12-year period at a major tertiary cancer center were reviewed. The inclusion criteria for this study included FNAB cases of salivary glands with subsequent histologic or flow cytometry follow up. The cytologic diagnoses for these cases were recategorized according to the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) based on the original reports. The risk of neoplasm and malignancy based on the cases with subsequent resection or flow cytometry and the most common causes of discrepancy were analyzed.

RESULTS

The risk of neoplasm ranged from 41% to 99% and the risk of malignancy ranged from 22% to 99% among the different MSRSGC categories. Lymphoid and myoepithelial rich lesions were the most common miscategorized lesions using the MSRSGC. Reactive changes due to inflammation were associated with overcalls. The most common malignancy in the atypical category was mucoepidermoid carcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Myoepithelial and lymphoid rich lesions arising in the salivary gland are associated with a higher risk of misclassification. The use of category IVB in the MSRSGC is appropriate for lesions with abundant myoepithelial cells. Reactive atypia seen in sialadenitis was the most common feature associated with overcall.

Management of Salivary Gland Malignancy: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for practicing physicians and other healthcare providers on the management of salivary gland malignancy.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, neuroradiology, pathology, and patient advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2000 through 2020. Outcomes of interest included survival, diagnostic accuracy, disease recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 293 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six main clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on preoperative evaluations, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate radiotherapy techniques, the role of systemic therapy, and follow-up evaluations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

When possible, evidence-based recommendations were developed to address the diagnosis and appropriate preoperative evaluations for patients with a salivary gland malignancy, therapeutic procedures, and appropriate treatment options in various salivary gland histologies.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.

Application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: Experience of an academic institution in a tertiary academic medical center

BACKGROUND

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) represents a standardized reporting system for salivary gland lesions. The recent literature has demonstrated a wide range of data regarding range of malignancy (ROM) and interobserver variability. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the reproducibility and interobserver agreement of MSRSGC, and establish the ROM in a unique patient population residing within a designated Health Professional Shortage Area.

METHODS

A total of 380 salivary gland fine-needle aspiration cases were obtained over a 3-year period. Corresponding cytology reports and slides were reviewed in a blinded fashion by a panel of cytopathologists and recategorized using MSRSGC. ROM was calculated by cytohistologic correlation in 176 cases. Agreement between review of reports and slides and interobserver reliability were determined using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

The ROMs per MSRSGC category based on review of reports and slides were as follows: 4% and 0%, respectively, for nonneoplastic; 22% and 0%, respectively, for nondiagnostic; 42.9% and 48%, respectively, for atypia of undetermined significance; 1.6% and 1.9%, respectively, for benign-neoplastic; 17.9% and 15.6%, respectively, for salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential; 81.8% and 71.4%, respectively, for suspicious for malignancy; and 100% and 90.5%, respectively, for malignant. There was a 59.2% overall agreement between review of reports and slides with regard to recategorizing salivary gland lesions (kappa, 0.51). The interobserver reliability demonstrated a 64.6% agreement (weighted kappa, 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

The ROMs at the study institution appeared comparable to those in the published literature. There was moderate overall agreement among cytopathologists and low interobserver agreement with regard to the indeterminate categories. Image-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens; rapid onsite adequacy; and integration of clinical, imaging, and ancillary studies can improve diagnostic accuracy among indeterminate lesions.

Retrospective implementation of the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology; a review of 5 years in a specialized cancer center

BACKGROUND

The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) aims to standardize terminology, facilitate communication, and optimize management by providing risk of malignancy (ROM) for each category. Our retrospective cohort aims to study the reproducibility of reporting using the MSRSGC and to calculate the ROM for each category.

METHODS

Cases of fine needle aspiration (FNA) of salivary glands and related cervical lymph nodes were retrieved from our files between 2015 to 2019. From a total of 63 cytology cases, 57 cases had available material for cytological reexamination of which 45 cases had follow up data. All cases were reviewed independently by two pathologists and reclassified based on the MSRSGC. The reclassification of cases for both pathologists was compared and the ROM for each diagnostic category was calculated.

RESULTS

The 57 cases were studied. Both pathologists had initial concordance in classification of 52 of 57 cases. The remainder five cases were concurred upon after combined review. The cases were classified as: Non Diagnostic (ND); (n = 8), Non Neoplastic (NN); (n = 7), Atypia of Undetermined Significance (AUS); (n = 8), Neoplasm Benign (NB) (n = 10), Salivary Gland Neoplasm of Uncertain Malignant Potential (SUMP) (n = 5), Suspicious for Malignancy (SM) (n = 1) and Malignant (M) (n = 18). The ROM was: ND: (33.3%); NN: (0%); AUS (33.3%); NB (0%); SUMP (25%); SM (100%) and M (100%).

CONCLUSION

Applying the MSRSGC is reproducible which facilitates standardization of reports and stratifying cases preoperatively. In general, the ROM for our cases was close to that reported in the literature.

A multicenter validation of the revised version of the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytology (MSRSGC)

INTRODUCTION

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a basic step in the diagnosis of salivary gland tumors that have a wide variety of histological types. The recent Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) can correlate the risk of malignancy with precise cytological features. A revised version was recently proposed to improve the surgical relevance and facilitate uniform management.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A multicenter study retrospectively used the original and revised MSRSGC criteria to classify a series of patients who received surgery after FNAC.

RESULTS

We enrolled 503 patients from three tertiary centers. The risk of malignancy for the MSRSGC resulted 19.5% in cat. I, 14.3% in cat. II, 17.6% in cat. III, 3.6% in cat. IVa, 24.6% in cat. IVb, 66.7% in cat. V, and 96.8% in cat. VI. The results from the revised MSRSGC were consistent with the original values.

CONCLUSION

The MSRSGC is a promising classification system. In our opinion, the revised version of the MSRSGC supplements FNAC with some crucial clinical information and can better identify the appropriate treatment in each category.

Interobserver variability between cytopathologists and cytotechnologists upon application and characterization of the indeterminate category in the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology

BACKGROUND

The indeterminate categories in the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) are diagnostically challenging because of inherent heterogeneity and complexity, with wide interobserver variability (IOV). Herein, the authors explore the concordance rate (CR) between cytopathologists (CPs) and cytotechnologists (CTs) in interpreting indeterminate salivary gland lesions using the MSRSGC.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2016, 86 indeterminate fine-needle aspirations had slides available for review, of which 48 had follow-up. Four CPs and 2 CTs performed an independent, blinded review of these slides and categorized them according to the MSRSGC. The CRs between CTs and CPs with the final sign-out cytopathologist (FCP) were assessed, and interobserver agreement was categorized into uniform, majority, divided, minimal, or no agreement.

RESULTS

The overall CR with the FCP ranged from 48.8% to 60.5% for CPs and from 22.1% to 36% for CTs. IOV κ scores for the entire group were 0.314 and, with the FCP as the reference, ranged from 0.403 to 0.539 for CPs and from 0.091 to 0.254 for CTs. Uniform, majority, divided, minimal, and no agreement was noted in 12.8%, 31.4%, 38.4%, 10.5%, and 6.9%, respectively, of all cases and in 16.7%, 35.4%, 31.3%, 8.3%, and 6.3%, respectively, of the cases with follow-up. Diagnostic challenges included distinguishing lymphoma from a reactive process and distinguishing mucin from mucin-like material.

CONCLUSIONS

CPs had modestly higher CRs compared with CTs; and, although the variable CRs highlight indeterminate IOV, the MSRSGC enables reproducibility. Characterizing larger cohorts in the indeterminate categories will further improve MSRSGC criteria. Moreover, education on the MSRSGC should include CTs and CPs to improve overall diagnostic accuracy.

Cytologic grading of primary malignant salivary gland tumors: A blinded review by an international panel

BACKGROUND

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used for the preoperative evaluation of salivary gland tumors. Tumor grade is a key factor influencing clinical management of salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs). To assess the ability to grade nonbasaloid SGCs in FNA specimens, an international panel of cytopathologists convened to review and score SGC cases.

METHODS

The study cohort included 61 cases of primary SGC from the pathology archives of 3 tertiary medical centers. Cases from 2005 to 2016 were selected, scanned, and digitized. Nineteen cytopathologists blinded to the histologic diagnosis reviewed the digitized cytology slides and graded them as low, high, or indeterminate. The panelists' results were then compared to the tumor grades based on histopathologic examination of the corresponding resection specimens.

RESULTS

All but 2 of the 19 (89.5%) expert panelists review more than 20 salivary gland FNAs per year; 16 (84.2%) of the panelists work at academic medical centers, and 13 (68.4%) have more than 10 years' experience. Participants had an overall accuracy of 89.4% in the grading of SGC cases, with 90.2% and 88.3% for low- and high-grade SGC, respectively. Acinic cell carcinoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma had the highest degree of accuracy, while epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma and salivary duct carcinoma had the lowest degree of accuracy. As expected, the intermediate-grade SGC cases showed the greatest variability (high-grade, 42.1%; low-grade, 37.5%, indeterminate, 20.4%).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the high accuracy of cytomorphologic grading of primary SGC by FNA as low- or high-grade. However, caution should be exercised when a grade cannot be confidently assigned.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma, and adenoid cystic carcinoma on fine-needle aspiration biopsy and The Milan System: an international multi-institutional study

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy (DA), risk of neoplasm (RON), and risk of malignancy (ROM) for the commonly encountered malignant salivary gland tumors mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MECa), acinic cell carcinoma (ACCa), and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ADCa) applying The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology (MSRSGC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cytology archives from 2007 to 2017 of 9 academic institutions were searched for salivary gland FNAs for the following key words mentioned either in the principal and/or differential diagnosis: MEC, ACCa, and ADCa. The original cytology diagnosis was retrospectively classified according to the MSRSGC. Patient demographics, biopsy site, and available surgical follow-up were recorded. The final analysis included only cases with surgical follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 212 salivary gland FNAs were included. Based on retrospective reclassification according to MSRSGC, 97 of 212 (46%) FNA cases carried a diagnosis of malignancy specific for either MECa, ACCa, or ADCa. In the remaining 115 cases, 24 of 212 (11%) were reclassified as suspicious for malignancy (SM) and 91 of 212 (43%) as salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP). The DA for MECa, ACCa, and ADCa was 78.7%, 75% and 89%, respectively. The RON was 100% for all 3 tumors and the ROM was 93.6% for MECa, 96.8% for ACCa, and 94.4% for ADCa.

CONCLUSIONS

The DA of 78.7% for MECa, 75% for ACCa, and 89% for ADCa is reasonable in FNA specimens. Although the management of definitive cases of malignancy remains unchanged, the MSRSGC provides a ROM for SM and SUMP categories, which can improve patient management.

The risk for malignancy using the Milan salivary gland classification categories: A 5-year retrospective review

Aims:

Since the six-tier Milan salivary gland classification has been introduced, there are very limited studies in literature reporting the risk stratification of the Milan classification.

Methods:

We retrospectively classified a total of 285 salivary gland cytology cases into Milan reporting categories; there were 23 (8.1%) nondiagnostic, 48 (16.8%) nonneoplastic, 19 (6.7%) atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 138 (48.4%) benign neoplasm, 13 (4.6%) neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (NUMP), 8 (2.8%) suspicious for malignancy, and 36 (12.6%) malignant. Almost 110 cases (38.6%) had surgical follow-up resections.

Results:

The overall risk for malignancy (ROM) was 12.5% for AUS, 3.2% for benign neoplasm, 72.7% for NUMP, and 100% for the suspicious for malignancy and malignant. The ROM for nondiagnostic and nonneoplastic categories was not representative due to limited follow-up resections. The salivary cytology had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 93.0%, 100%, 100%, and 46.2% for neoplasm and 82.3%, 95.8%, 90.3%, and 92.0% for malignant.

Conclusion:

Our study supports the adaptation of the six-tier Milan classification for reporting salivary gland cytology, as well as emphasizing the utility of the NUMP category.

Application of the Milan System for Reporting Submandibular Gland Cytopathology: An international, multi-institutional study

BACKGROUND

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a 6-tier diagnostic category system with associated risks of malignancy (ROMs) and management recommendations. Submandibular gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is uncommon with a higher frequency of inflammatory lesions and a higher relative proportion of malignancy, and this may affect the ROM and subsequent management. This study evaluated the application of the MSRSGC and the ROM for each diagnostic category for 734 submandibular gland FNAs.

METHODS

Submandibular gland FNA cytology specimens from 15 international institutions (2013-2017) were retrospectively assigned to an MSRSGC diagnostic category as follows: nondiagnostic, nonneoplastic, atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), benign neoplasm, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP), suspicious for malignancy (SM), or malignant. A correlation with the available histopathologic follow-up was performed, and the ROM was calculated for each MSRSGC diagnostic category.

RESULTS

The case cohort of 734 aspirates was reclassified according to the MSRSGC as follows: nondiagnostic, 21.4% (0%-50%); nonneoplastic, 24.2% (9.1%-53.6%); AUS, 6.7% (0%-14.3%); benign neoplasm, 18.3% (0%-52.5%); SUMP, 12% (0%-37.7%); SM, 3.5% (0%-12.5%); and malignant, 13.9% (2%-31.3%). The histopathologic follow-up was available for 333 cases (45.4%). The ROMs were as follows: nondiagnostic, 10.6%; nonneoplastic, 7.5%; AUS, 27.6%; benign neoplasm, 3.2%; SUMP, 41.9%; SM, 82.3%; and malignant, 93.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

This multi-institutional study shows that the ROM of each MSRSGC category for submandibular gland FNA is similar to that reported for parotid gland FNA, although the reported rates for the different MSRSGC categories were variable across institutions. Thus, the MSRSGC can be reliably applied to submandibular gland FNA.

A Call for Universal Acceptance of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology

OBJECTIVES

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) established a standardized, tiered reporting system for salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA) that has gained international acceptance among cytologists. Our goal was to review the key features of the MSRSGC to familiarize the surgical community with this system and its application to the FNA evaluation of salivary gland masses.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the MSRSGC and its application in clinical practice.

RESULTS

The MSRSGC consists of six major diagnostic categories: 1) nondiagnostic, 2) non-neoplastic, 3) atypia of undetermined significance, 4) neoplasm (benign or salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential), 5) suspicious for malignancy, and 6) malignant. Each diagnostic category is associated with an implied risk of malignancy with implications for clinical management.

CONCLUSIONS

The MSRSGC is similar to the system used for reporting thyroid FNA, which is familiar to most otolaryngologists and head and neck surgeons. As this reporting system continues to gain popularity among pathologists, widespread understanding by surgeons will be important to standardize communication and classification of salivary gland cytopathology to improve clinical care. Laryngoscope, 130:80-85, 2020.

The utility of the Milan System as a risk stratification tool for salivary gland fine needle aspiration cytology specimens

OBJECTIVE

To perform a retrospective investigation of our institutional experience with salivary gland fine needle aspirations (FNA) through the framework of The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) and assess the risks of neoplasm and malignancy for each diagnostic category.

METHODS

All salivary gland FNAs performed from January 2009 to December 2016 were retrospectively categorised according to the MSRSGC. When available, pre-operative cytological results were correlated with subsequent histological follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 893 FNAs were reviewed. The specimens were retrospectively classified as nondiagnostic (ND: 13.5%), non-neoplastic (NN: 16.1%), atypia of undetermined significance (AUS: 10.8%), benign neoplasm (BN: 34.9%), salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP: 8.2%), suspicious for malignancy (SM: 2.7%) and malignant (M: 13.8%). Histological follow-up was available for 429 cases (48%); the majority (68.1%) were benign. The risks of neoplasm and malignancy for each category were as follows: ND: 64.5%, 16.1%; NN: 42.9%, 17.9%; AUS: 79.6%, 30.6%; BN: 100%, 2.2%; SUMP: 100%, 46.6%; SM: 94.7%, 78.9%; and M: 100%, 98.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The MSRSGC is a useful classification scheme for stratifying salivary gland lesions according to their associated risk of malignancy and guiding clinicians toward appropriate management. Diagnostic pitfalls are seen in a small proportion of cases and a multidisciplinary approach for assessing salivary gland pathology is essential in their evaluation.

A critical appraisal of the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytology (MSRSGC) with histological correlation over a 3-year period: Indian scenario

BACKGROUND

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the first line investigation for pre-operative diagnosis of salivary gland lesions, but due to its inherent limitations remains a challenge for the cytopathologists. The recently proposed international risk stratification scheme, the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology (MSRSGC) aims to promote and standardise the communication between cytopathologist and clinician thereby improving patient care.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all salivary gland cytology cases was performed over a 3-year period, reviewed by pathologists and categorised into 1 of the 6 diagnostic categories according to MSRSGC, namely, non-diagnostic, non-neoplastic, atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), benign neoplasm, and salivary gland neoplasm of undetermined significance (SUMP), suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and malignant neoplasm. Cyto- histological correlation was done wherever possible. Risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated for each diagnostic category.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 150 salivary FNAC cases, histopathology was available for 64 cases. The sensitivity of FNAC was 81.8%, specificity was 100% while the diagnostic accuracy was 96.9%. The positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 96.4% respectively. The ROM for non-diagnostic, non-neoplastic, AUS, benign neoplasm, SUMP, SFM, and malignant categories were 0%, 10%, 50%, 2.5%, 50%, 100%, and 100% respectively.

CONCLUSION

MSRSGC fulfils the critical need for a uniform, internationally acceptable reporting system with ROM specified for each category. However, large scale multi centre studies need to be conducted before its reliability and validity is proven.

Updates in Salivary Gland Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy: The Use of the Milan System and Ancillary Testing

Salivary gland fine needle aspiration biopsies remain common specimens seen by most cytology services. The diagnostic diversity and overlap between many of the lesions seen with these biopsies impart many challenges for the cytopathologist, rendering most specific diagnoses impossible with cytology alone. Here, the use of the Milan System for the classification of salivary gland fine needle aspiration biopsy FNAB is discussed, together with the potential use of ancillary testing in arriving at definitive diagnoses.

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC): An ASC-IAC-Sponsored System for Reporting Salivary Gland Fine-Needle Aspiration

The diagnostic role of salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (SG-FNA) is well established in the preoperative evaluation of patients with salivary gland lesions. At present, most salivary SG-FNA specimens are diagnosed based on conventional diagnostic criteria. However, there exists a lack of uniform reporting for these specimens to guide the clinical management of patients. This void motivated a group of experienced cytopathologists to spearhead the development of a uniform reporting system. This international panel, under the sponsorship of the American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) and the International Academy of Cytology (IAC), gathered in September 2015 at the European Congress of Cytology, held in Milan, Italy, to propose the “Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology” (MSRSGC). This effort sparked the interest of many and brought forth an agreement to develop an evidence-based tiered classification consisting of 6 diagnostic categories. It is hoped that this standard reporting system will enhance the overall effectiveness of SG-FNA reporting across institutions, with the ultimate result being better communication and improved patient care.

A retrospective 3-year study of salivary gland FNAC with categorisation using the Milan reporting system

INTRODUCTION

To assess our practice using the recently developed standardised classification system designated The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) and to ascertain the rates of malignancy for each category by means of a retrospective study.

METHODS

All salivary gland FNAC samples received between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2015 were retrospectively assigned a diagnostic category code from the MSRSGC. Cytology results were correlated with subsequent histology (where available), and clinical and radiological follow up.

RESULTS

A total of 287 salivary gland FNA samples were received from 272 patients. The specimens were classified as non-diagnostic (21.3%), non-neoplastic (22%), atypia of undetermined significance (2.4%), neoplasm benign (36.9%), neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (5.2%), suspicious for malignancy (1.7%) and malignant (10.5%; low grade 1.4% and high grade 9.1%). Histological and clinical/radiological follow up was available for 138 (48.1%) specimens, clinical/radiological follow up only for 145 (50.5%) and no follow up for the remaining four (1.4%) samples. The risk of malignancy for each category was non-diagnostic (8.5%), non-neoplastic (1.6%), atypia of undetermined significance (0%), neoplasm benign (1.9%), neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (26.7%), suspicious for malignancy (100%) and malignant (100%).

CONCLUSIONS

The MSRSGC appears to be a useful tool to guide clinical management and provide an indication of possible risk of malignancy. We favour implementing use of these categories in our reporting practice with a future re-evaluation to assess maintenance of service quality as well as the clinical utility of this reporting system.