The contralaterally projecting neurons of the isthmic nucleus in five anuran species: a retrograde tracing study with HRP and cobalt

A half century of experimental neuroanatomical tracing

Most of our current understanding of brain function and dysfunction has its firm base in what is so elegantly called the 'anatomical substrate', i.e. the anatomical, histological, and histochemical domains within the large knowledge envelope called 'neuroscience' that further includes physiological, pharmacological, neurochemical, behavioral, genetical and clinical domains. This review focuses mainly on the anatomical domain in neuroscience. To a large degree neuroanatomical tract-tracing methods have paved the way in this domain. Over the past few decades, a great number of neuroanatomical tracers have been added to the technical arsenal to fulfill almost any experimental demand. Despite this sophisticated arsenal, the decision which tracer is best suited for a given tracing experiment still represents a difficult choice. Although this review is obviously not intended to provide the last word in the tract-tracing field, we provide a survey of the available tracing methods including some of their roots. We further summarize our experience with neuroanatomical tracers, in an attempt to provide the novice user with some advice to help this person to select the most appropriate criteria to choose a tracer that best applies to a given experimental design.

Roles of periventricular neurons in retinotectal transmission in the optic tectum

The midbrain roof is a retinorecipient region referred to as the optic tectum in lower vertebrates, and the superior colliculus in mammals. The retinal fibers projecting to the tectum transmit visual information to tectal retinorecipient neurons. Periventricular neurons are a subtype of these neurons that have their somata in the deepest layer of the teleostean tectum and apical dendrites ramifying at more superficial layers consisting of retinal fibers. The retinotectal synapses between the retinal fibers and periventricular neurons are glutamatergic, and ionotropic glutamate receptors mediate the transmission in these synapses. This transmission involves long-term potentiation, and is modulated by hormone action. Visual information processed in the periventricular neurons is transmitted to adjacent tectal cells and target nuclei of periventricular neuron axonal branches, some of which relay the visual information to other brain areas controlling behavior. We demonstrated that periventricular neurons play a principal role in visual information processing in the teleostean optic tectum; the effects of tectal output on behavior is discussed also in the present review.

Afferent connectivity to different functional zones of the optic tectum in goldfish

This work studies the afferent connectivity to different functionally identified tectal zones in goldfish. The sources of afferents contributed to different degrees to the functionally defined zones. The dorsocentral area of the telencephalon was connected mainly with the ipsilateral anteromedial tectal zone. At diencephalic levels, neurons were found in three different regions: preoptic, thalamic, and pretectal. Preoptic structures (suprachiasmatic and preoptic nuclei) projected mainly to the anteromedial tectal zone, whereas thalamic (ventral and dorsal) and pretectal (central, superficial, and posterior commissure) nuclei projected to all divisions of the tectum. In the mesencephalon, the mesencephalic reticular formation, torus longitudinalis, torus semicircularis, and nucleus isthmi were, in the anteroposterior axis, topographically connected with the tectum. In addition, neurons in the contralateral tectum projected to the injected zones in a symmetrical point-to-point correspondence. At rhombencephalic levels, the superior reticular formation was connected to all studied tectal zones, whereas medial and inferior reticular formations were connected with medial and posterior tectal zones. The present results support a different quantitative afferent connectivity to each tectal zone, possibly based on the sensorimotor transformations that the optic tectum carries out to generate orienting responses.

The nucleus isthmi and dual modulation of the receptive field of tectal neurons in non-mammals

The nucleus isthmi in the dorsolateral tegmentum had been one of the most obscure structures in the nonmammalian midbrain for eight decades. Recent studies have shown that this nucleus and its mammalian homologue, the parabigeminal nucleus, are all visual centers, which receive information from the ipsilateral tectum and project back either ipsilaterally or bilaterally depending on species, but not an auditory center as suggested before. On the other hand, the isthmotectal pathways exert dual, both excitatory and inhibitory, actions on tectal cells in amphibians and reptiles. In birds, the magnocellular and parvocellular subdivisions of this nucleus produce excitatory and inhibitory effects on tectal cells, respectively. The excitatory pathway is mediated by glutamatergic synapses with AMPA and NMDA receptors and/or cholinergic synapses with muscarinic receptors, whereas the inhibitory pathway is mediated by GABAergic synapses via GABA(A) receptors. Further studies have shown that the magnocellular and parvocellular subdivisions can differentially modulate the excitatory and inhibitory regions of the receptive field of tectal neurons, respectively. Both the positive and the negative feedback pathways may work together in a winner-take-all manner, so that the animal could attend to only one of several competing visual targets simultaneously present in the visual field. Some behavioral tests seem to be consistent with this hypothesis. The present review indicates that the tecto-isthmic system in birds is an excellent model for further studying tectal modulation and possibly winner-take-all mechanisms.

Peptides in frog brain areas processing visual information

Vision is the most important sensory modality to anurans and a great deal of work in terms of hodological, physiological, and behavioral studies has been devoted to the visual system. The aim of this account is to survey data about the distribution of peptides in primary (lateral geniculate complex, pretectum, tectum) and secondary (striatum, anterodorsal and anteroventral tegmental nuclei, isthmic nucleus) visual relay centers. The emphasis is on general traits but interspecies variations are also noted. The smallest amount of peptide-containing neuronal elements was found in the lateral geniculate complex, where primarily nerve fibers showed immunostaining. All peptides found in the lateral geniculate complex, except two, occurred in the pretectum together with four other peptides. A large number of neurons showing intense neuropeptide thyrosine-like immunoreactivity was characteristic here. The mesencephalic tectum was the richest in peptide-like immunoreactive neuronal elements. Almost all peptides investigated were present mainly in fibers, but 9 peptides were found also in cells. The immunoreactive fibers show a complicated overlapping laminar arrangement. Cholecystokinin octapeptide, enkephalins, neuropeptide tyrosine, and substance P (not discussed here) gave the most prominent immunoreactivity. Several peptides also occur in the tectum of fishes, reptiles, birds, and mammals. Peptides in various combinations were found in the striatum, the anterodorsal- and anteroventral tegmental nucleus, and the isthmic nucleus that receive projections from the primary visual centers. The functional significance of peptides in visual information processing is not known. The only exception is neuropeptide tyrosine, which was found to be inhibitory on retinotectal synapses.

Plasticity in the tectum of Xenopus laevis: binocular maps

Xenopus frogs exhibit dramatic changes in the binocular projections to the tectum during a critical period of development. Their eyes change position in the head, moving from lateral to dorsal and creating an increasing region of binocular overlap. There is a corresponding shift of binocular projections to the tectum that keeps the two eyes' maps in register with each other throughout this period. The ipsilateral input is relayed via the nucleus isthmi. Two factors bring the ipsilateral projection into register with the contralateral projection. First, chemoaffinity cues establish a crude topographic map beginning when the shift of eye position begins. Approximately 1 month later, visual cues bring the ipsilateral map into register with the contralateral map. The role of visual input is demonstrated by the ability of the axons that bring the ipsilateral eye's map to the tectum to reorganize in response to a surgical rotation of one eye and to come into register with the contralateral eye's map. This plasticity can be blocked by NMDA receptor antagonists during the critical period. In normal adults, reorganization is minimal. Eye rotation fails to induce reorganization of the ipsilateral map. However, plasticity persists indefinitely in animals that are reared in the dark, and plasticity can be restored in normally-reared animals by treatment with NMDA. The working model to explain this plasticity posits that correlated input from the two eyes triggers opening of NMDA receptor channels and initiates events that stabilize appropriately-located isthmotectal connections. Specific tests of this model are discussed.

Localization and source of gamma aminobutyric acid immunoreactivity in the isthmic nucleus of the frog Rana esculenta

The distribution of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-containing neurons and nerve fibers was studied in the isthmic nucleus of the frog Rana esculenta using light and electron microscopical immunohistochemical techniques. Approximately 0.5% of isthmic cells showed GABA immunopositivity, and the majority of these cells was found in the anterior one-third of the nucleus. A meshwork of GABA-immunostained fine beaded axons filled the entire isthmic nucleus. The GABA-immunoreactive terminals formed pericellular basket-like structures around a few cells both in the medulla and the cortex of the isthmic nucleus. To determine the source of GABA-positive fibers in the isthmic nucleus lesion experiments were carried out. After unilateral tectal ablation no change was observed in GABA immunoreactivity. Hemisectioning the tegmentum close to the anterior border of the isthmic nucleus, transection of the caudal tectal commissure and decussatio veli, or electrical lesioning of the anterodorsal tegmental nucleus all resulted in a moderate decrease in the density of GABA-positive fibers. Our results suggest that the majority of GABA-positive fibers derives from local GABA-positive cells, but some GABAergic afferents seem to arise in the tegmentum.

Seeing beyond the midline: the role of the contralateral isthmotectal projection in the leopard frog

The ground level visual field of each eye of the leopard frog includes the entire ipsilateral 180-deg field and approximately 60 deg into the frontal contralateral field. When one eye is covered with an opaque patch, a frog responds to prey stimuli over the entire field of the other eye. Nevertheless, when one optic nerve is cut, the animal responds to prey in the ipsilateral hemifield of the connected eye, but only responds as far as about 30 deg past the frontal midline. If one optic tract is cut, the animal does not respond to prey past the frontal midline. We hypothesized that the responses past the frontal midline might be mediated by input from contralaterally projecting isthmotectal fibers. These fibers originate in the nucleus isthmi, a posterior midbrain structure. We found that when we placed an opaque patch over one eye and either ablated the ipsilateral nucleus isthmi, or cut crossing isthmotectal fibers in the optic chiasm, or blocked input to nucleus isthmi by ablating the ipsilateral tectal lobe, animals did not respond to prey stimuli past the frontal midline. We found that when we placed an opaque patch over one eye and cut crossing optic fibers in the anterior part of the optic chiasm (sparing crossing isthmotectal fibers), animals responded to prey stimuli in the nasal half of the seeing eye's contralateral frontal field. Our results suggest that contralaterally projecting isthmotectal fibers enable the frog to respond to stimuli past the frontal midline. We suggest a one-dimensional model of how nucleus isthmi influences tectal function.