A randomized, open-label 3-way crossover study to investigate the relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of crushed sildenafil 20 mg tablets mixed with apple sauce, extemporaneously prepared suspension (EP), and intact sildenafil 20 mg tablets in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions

Development and Bioequivalence of 3D-Printed Medication at the Point-of-Care: Bridging the Gap Toward Personalized Medicine

Personalized medicine is currently hampered by the lack of flexible drug formulations. Especially for pediatric patients, manual compounding of personalized drug formulations by pharmacists is required. Three-Dimensional (3D) printing of medicines, which enables small-scale manufacturing at the point-of-care, can fulfill this unmet clinical need. This study investigates the feasibility of developing a 3D-printed tablet formulation at the point-of-care which complies to quality requirements for clinical practice, including bioequivalence. Development, manufacturing, and quality control of the 3D-printed tablets was performed at the manufacturing facility and laboratory of the department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology at Leiden University Medical Center. Sildenafil was used as a model drug for the tablet formulation. Along with the 3D-printed tablets a randomized, an open-label, 2-period, crossover, single-dose clinical trial to assess bioequivalence was performed in healthy adults. Bioequivalence was established if areas under the plasma concentration curve from administration to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC_0-t ) and maximum plasma concentration (C_max ) ratios were within the limits of 80.00-125.00%. The manufacturing process provided reproducible 3D-printed tablets that adhered to quality control requirements and were consequently used in the clinical trial. The clinical trial was conducted in 12 healthy volunteers. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of both AUC_0-t and C_max ratios were within bioequivalence limits (AUC_0-t 90% CI: 87.28-104.14; C_max 90% CI: 80.23-109.58). For the first time, we demonstrate the development of a 3D-printed tablet formulation at the point-of-care that is bioequivalent to its marketed originator. The 3D printing of personalized formulations is a disruptive technology for compounding, bridging the gap toward personalized medicine.

Sildenafil 4.0-Integrated Synthetic Chemistry, Formulation and Analytical Strategies Effecting Immense Therapeutic and Societal Impact in the Fourth Industrial Era

Sildenafil is a potent selective, reversible inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) approved for the treatment of erectile dysfunction and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Whilst twenty years have passed since its original approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA), sildenafil enters the fourth industrial era catalyzing the treatment advances against erectile dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension. The plethora of detailed clinical data accumulated and the two sildenafil analogues marketed, namely tadalafil and vardenafil, signify the relevant therapeutic and commercial achievements. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behavior of the drug appears complex, interdependent and of critical importance whereas the treatment of special population cohorts is considered. The diversity of the available formulation strategies and their compatible administration routes, extend from tablets to bolus suspensions and from per os to intravenous, respectively, inheriting the associated strengths and weaknesses. In this comprehensive review, we attempt to elucidate the multi-disciplinary elements spanning the knowledge fields of chemical synthesis, physicochemical properties, pharmacology, clinical applications, biopharmaceutical profile, formulation approaches for different routes of administration and analytical strategies, currently employed to guide the development of sildenafil-based compositions.

Evaluation of Serum/Urine Genomic and Metabolomic Profiles to Improve the Adherence to Sildenafil Therapy in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction

Type V-phosphodiesterase-inhibitors (PDE5i) are the first choice drugs in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), being effective in 60-70% of patients. However, approximately 50% of patients per year discontinue the treatment with PDE5i after reporting poor drug efficacy or major adverse drug reactions (ADR). To identify early markers of efficacy/safety for the treatment of ED with PDE5i, the basal clinical characteristics of patients, integrated with metabolomics analysis of serum and urine and genomic data, were here correlated with the PDE5i efficacy and the occurrence of ADR upon administration. Thirty-six males with new diagnosis of ED were consecutively recruited and characterized at baseline for anthropometrics, blood pressure, blood glucose, lipid profile, serum levels of thyroid/sex hormones and erectile function evaluated by IIEF-15 questionnaire. Targeted Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) was applied to genes involved in PDE5i pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. Fasting metabolic profiles of serum and urine were assessed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomics analysis. Patients were prescribed on-demand therapy with Sildenafil oro-dispersible film and followed-up after 3 months from recruitment. Baseline data were compared with IIEF-15 score at follow-up and with the occurrence of ADR recorded by a dedicated questionnaire. Twenty-eight patients were finally included in the analysis. Serum LDL-cholesterol levels were increased in those reporting ADR (143.3 ± 13.2 mg/dl ADR vs. 133.1 ± 12.4 mg/dl No ADR; p = 0.046). NGS data showed that specific variants of PDE11A and CYP2D7 genes were more represented in drug responders (both relative risk = 2.7 [0.9-5.1]; p = 0.04). NMR-based metabolomics showed the highest association between serum LDL-cholesterol metabolites and the occurrence of ADR (Hazard ratio = 17.5; p = 0.019). The association between lipid profile and the ADR pattern suggests major cues in the tailoring of ED therapy with PDE5i.

Pooled bioequivalence study database from Turkey: characterization of adverse events and determination of split points based on Gini Index as a promising method

Background

Manufacturing of and medication with generic drugs is increasing around the world. Bioequivalence (BE) studies are being performed routinely by Contract Research Organisations (CROs) in Turkey. However, an overall evaluation for the attended volunteers, examined Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) and the observed adverse events have not been studied in the field.

Objective

Our aim was to revisit and compile the BE studies carried out between the years 2000–2013 of a CRO (N-CRO) in Turkey.

Methods

A dataset of 261 BE studies has been created for the observed adverse events with regards to the frequency, type, and drug subgroups. As an advanced evaluation, the Gini Index method has been used in the 63 available BE studies to obtain split points for two pharmacokinetic parameters, area under the plasma/serum concentration (AUC) and maximum plasma/serum concentration (Cmax), in order to investigate their likely effect on the adverse events.

Results

Thousand six hundred and forty two adverse events were found in the 261 BE studies involving 7828 volunteers with the frequency of 6.29 per study and 0.21 per volunteer. The most frequently observed adverse events were; headache, somnolence, nausea, dizziness and vomiting, respectively. Hundred and nine different APIs were observed. ‘Genitourinary system and sex hormones’ subgroup drugs had the highest frequency of the adverse events. Adverse event frequencies above the identified split points for Cmax and AUC values were higher than the frequencies below them.

Conclusion

The review of 13 years period of BE studies revealed that the demographic properties of the volunteers and the study designs were in compliance with national and international guidelines. The promising outcome could be showing the increase of the adverse event frequencies above the obtained split points as the reflection of the likely individual pharmacokinetic differences in the adverse event occurence.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2527-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.