NSAID Treatment Before and on the Early Onset of Acute Kidney Injury Had an Opposite Effect on the Outcome of Patients With AKI

Background: NSAIDs are one of the most frequently used medications and a risk factor for AKI. However, the optimal time of NSAIDs in patients with AKI is unknown. Methods: A secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized clinical trial including adult inpatients with acute kidney injury was performed. Univariate, multivariate, and subgroup analyses were used to explore the impact of NSAIDs during the early onset of AKI on the outcome of patients with AKI. Results: A total of 6,030 patients with AKI were enrolled in the study. Following are the findings of the multi-factor analysis: NSAID treatments within 72 and 24 h before the onset of AKI were not associated with AKI progression, dialysis, or discharge from dialysis; only NSAID treatment within the 24-h onset of AKI was associated with these outcomes, and their OR values were independently 1.50 (95% CI: 1.02-2.19, p = 0.037), 4.20 (95% CI: 1.47-11.97, p = 0.007), and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.54-0.92, p = 0.011); only NSAID treatment within the 24-h onset of AKI would decrease the 14-day mortality, and the OR value was 0.52 (95% CI: 0.33-0.82, p = 0.005). The subgroup analysis revealed that in patients with age ≥65 years, CKD (chronic kidney disease), congestive heart failure, hypertension, and liver disease, NSAID treatments within the 24-h onset of AKI would deteriorate the outcome of patients with AKI. Conclusion: Before an early onset of AKI, NSAID treatment might be safe, but during the onset of AKI, even early NSAID treatment would deteriorate the outcome of patients with AKI.

Bazedoxifene activates the angiotensin II-induced HUVEC hypertension model by targeting SIRT1

The shift in vascular function to vasoconstriction, pro-inflammatory state, oxidative stress and carbon monoxide deficiency may to endothelial dysfunction and injury, which is the key event in hypertension. Estrogen receptor modulators play a protective role in blood vessels. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of bazedoxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and its potential underlying mechanism of action. The present study treated endothelial cells with different concentrations of bazedoxifene and determined cell viability using Cell Counting Kit-8 to screen for the optimal working concentration of bazedoxifene. Subsequently, an angiotensin II (AngII)-induced vascular endothelial cell model was established to observe the effect of bazedoxifene on AngII-induced endothelial cells. The concentrations of nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) were detected using NO and ROS kits, respectively. The protein expression of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), oxidative stress-related proteins and apoptosis-related proteins was detected using western blotting, and apoptosis was detected using a TUNEL assay. The results demonstrated that bazedoxifene promoted AngII-induced HUVEC viability, reduced the expression of stress-related proteins and inhibited apoptosis. Furthermore, bazedoxifene activated SIRT1 to promote the proliferation and inhibit the oxidative stress and apoptosis of AngII-induced HUVECs. These findings suggested that bazedoxifene could effectively promote AngII-induced HUVEC proliferation and inhibit cell apoptosis and oxidative stress. In addition, bazedoxifene protected HUVEC dysfunction induced by AngII by targeting the activation of SIRT1. In summary, bazedoxifene could improve the protective role against hypertension induced by AngII.

Bioequivalence for a Fixed-Dose Combination Formulation of Bazedoxifene and Cholecalciferol Compared With the Corresponding Single Entities Given Together

A fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of bazedoxifene 20 mg and cholecalciferol 8 mg was developed to increase medication compliance and convenience for osteoporosis patients. This study was conducted to demonstrate bioequivalence by comparing the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and tolerability of an FDC tablet and the individual component tablets. A randomized, open-label, single-dosing, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study was conducted in 52 healthy subjects. All subjects were randomly assigned to 2 sequences, and they received FDC tablets of bazedoxifene and cholecalciferol and individual component tablets. Serial blood samples for PK evaluation were collected up to 24 hours predose and 120 hours postdose, and the PK parameters were estimated by noncompartmental methods. Throughout the study, tolerability was assessed based on adverse events, vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests. Of the enrolled 52 subjects, 47 subjects completed the study. The results, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (90%CIs), of bazedoxifene C_max and AUC_0-t for FDC to single entities given together were 0.98 (0.91-1.05) and 1.02 (0.97-1.07), respectively. The GMRs (90%CIs) of cholecalciferol C_max and AUC_0-t for FDC to single entities given together were 0.96 (0.91-1.00) and 0.94 (0.90-0.99), respectively. Overall, the GMRs (90%CIs) of the PK parameter of bazedoxifene and cholecalciferol fell within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.8-1.25. There were no clinically significant differences in the safety profile between the 2 treatments. In conclusion, this study confirmed the development of a new FDC drug by demonstrating that the FDC formulation of bazedoxifene and cholecalciferol is biologically equivalent to the coadministered individual formulations.

Bazedoxifene for the treatment of osteoporosis

Introduction: Bazedoxifene (BZD) is a third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with additional favorable effects in lipids, uterine and breast tissue. Areas covered: In this review, the authors outline clinical data regarding the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of continuous BZD administration up to seven years in randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trials. Long-term treatment with BZD for postmenopausal osteoporosis is generally safe and well tolerated. BZD achieves small but significant increases in the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine but not the total hip. In addition, BZD reduces significantly the risk of vertebral fractures but not of non-vertebral and hip fractures, with the exception of high fracture risk postmenopausal women in whom BZD significantly reduces non-vertebral fractures. Expert opinion: BZD does not seem to offer significant advantages over the other available antiresorptive agents. However, considering the need for long-term management of osteoporosis, BZD may have a place in the long-term therapeutic planning of the disease.