Pharmacokinetic Properties of Single and Multiple Doses of Ertugliflozin, a Selective Inhibitor of SGLT2, in Healthy Chinese Subjects

Mechanistic evaluation of the inhibitory effect of four SGLT-2 inhibitors on SGLT 1 and SGLT 2 using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approaches

Sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 (SGLT 2, gliflozins) inhibitors are potent orally active drugs approved for managing type 2 diabetes. SGLT 2 inhibitors exert a glucose-lowering effect by suppressing sodium-glucose co-transporters 1 and 2 in the intestinal and kidney proximal tubules. In this study, we developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and simulated the concentrations of ertugliflozin, empagliflozin, henagliflozin, and sotagliflozin in target tissues. We used the perfusion-limited model to illustrate the disposition of SGLT 2 inhibitors in vivo. The modeling parameters were obtained from the references. Simulated steady-state plasma concentration-time curves of the ertugliflozin, empagliflozin, henagliflozin, and sotagliflozin are similar to the clinically observed curves. The 90% prediction interval of simulated excretion of drugs in urine captured the observed data well. Furthermore, all corresponding model-predicted pharmacokinetic parameters fell within a 2-fold prediction error. At the approved doses, we estimated the effective concentrations in intestinal and kidney proximal tubules and calculated the inhibition ratio of SGLT transporters to differentiate the relative inhibition capacities of SGLT1 and 2 in each gliflozin. According to simulation results, four SGLT 2 inhibitors can nearly completely inhibit SGLT 2 transporter at the approved dosages. Sotagliflozin exhibited the highest inhibition activity on SGLT1, followed by ertugliflozin, empagliflozin, and henagliflozin, which showed a lower SGLT 1 inhibitory effect. The PBPK model successfully simulates the specific target tissue concentration that cannot be measured directly and quantifies the relative contribution toward SGLT 1 and 2 for each gliflozin.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses of Ertugliflozin in Select Ethnic Populations

Ertugliflozin, a sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, is approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Two population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses were conducted, using data from up to 17 phase 1 to 3 studies, to characterize ertugliflozin PK parameters in select ethnic subgroups: (1) East/Southeast (E/SE) Asian vs non‐E/SE Asian subjects; (2) Asian subjects from mainland China vs Asian subjects from the rest of the world and non‐Asian subjects. A 2‐compartment model with first‐order absorption, lag time, and first‐order elimination was fitted to the observed data. For the E/SE Asian vs non‐E/SE Asian analysis (13 692 PK observations from 2276 subjects), E/SE Asian subjects exhibited a 17% increase in apparent clearance (CL/F) and 148% increase in apparent central volume of distribution (Vc/F) vs non‐E/SE Asian subjects. However, individual post hoc CL/F values were similar between groups when body weight differences were considered. For the second analysis (16 018 PK observations from 2620 subjects), compared with non‐Asian subjects, CL/F was similar while Vc/F increased by 44% in Asian subjects from mainland China and both CL/F and Vc/F increased in Asian subjects from the rest of the world (8% and 115%, respectively) vs non‐Asian subjects. Increases in Vc/F would decrease the ertugliflozin maximum concentration but would not impact area under the concentration‐time curve. Therefore, the differences in CL/F (area under the concentration‐time curve) and Vc/F were not considered clinically relevant or likely to result in meaningful ethnic differences in the PK of ertugliflozin.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ertugliflozin in Healthy Japanese and Western Subjects

Ertugliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, is approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes. This randomized, double-blind (sponsor-open) study in healthy Japanese subjects and open-label study in Western subjects assessed ertugliflozin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Cohort A received 3 ascending single doses of ertugliflozin (1, 5, and 25 mg; n = 6 Japanese, n = 6 Western) or placebo (n = 3 Japanese) under fasted conditions. Cohort B received multiple once-daily doses of ertugliflozin 25 mg (n = 6 Japanese) or placebo (n = 3 Japanese) for 7 days under fed conditions. For Japanese subjects in Cohort A, maximum plasma concentrations (C_max ) were observed 1 to 1.5 hours after dosing, and apparent mean terminal half-life was 12.4 to 13.6 hours. The ratios of the geometric means (Japanese/Western) for ertugliflozin 1-, 5-, and 25-mg single doses were 95.94%, 99.66%, and 90.32%, respectively, for area under the plasma concentration-time curve and 107.59%, 97.47%, and 80.04%, respectively, for C_max . Area under the plasma concentration-time curve and C_max increased in a dose-proportional manner. For Cohort B, C_max was observed 2.5 hours after dosing (days 1 and 7), and steady state was reached by day 4. The 24-hour urinary glucose excretion was dose dependent. Ertugliflozin was generally well tolerated. There were no meaningful differences in exposure, urinary glucose excretion, and safety between Japanese and Western subjects.

Efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin across racial groups in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor ertugliflozin across racial groups in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Methods: Pooled analysis of data from randomized, double-blind studies in the ertugliflozin phase III development program. Seven placebo- and comparator-controlled studies were used to assess safety (N = 4859) and three placebo-controlled studies were used to assess efficacy (N = 1544). Least-squares (LS) mean change from baseline was calculated for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Safety evaluation included overall and prespecified adverse events (AEs).Results: At Week 26, ertugliflozin provided a greater reduction in HbA1c, body weight and SBP versus placebo in all racial subgroups. The placebo-adjusted LS mean change (95% confidence interval) from baseline in HbA1c was -0.8% (-1.0, -0.7) and -1.0% (-1.1, -0.8) with ertugliflozin 5 mg and 15 mg, respectively, in the White subgroup, -0.7% (-1.2, -0.2) and -0.8% (-1.3, -0.3) in the Black subgroup, and -0.8% (-1.1, -0.5) and -1.0% (-1.3, -0.8) in the Asian subgroup. The incidences of overall AEs, serious AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation from study medication were similar between the ertugliflozin 5 mg, 15 mg and non-ertugliflozin groups within each racial subgroup. The incidence of female genital mycotic infection (GMI) was higher with ertugliflozin than non-ertugliflozin across all racial subgroups. The incidence of male GMI was higher with ertugliflozin than non-ertugliflozin in the White sub-group; however, there were few male GMI events in the non-White subgroups.Conclusions: In patients with T2DM, treatment with ertugliflozin improved HbA1c, body weight and SBP across all racial subgroups. Ertugliflozin had a generally similar safety profile across racial subgroups and was generally well tolerated. Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT01986855, NCT01999218, NCT01958671, NCT02099110, NCT02036515, NCT02033889, and NCT02226003.

Opportunities of Antidiabetic Drugs in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Meta-Analysis and Perspectives for Trial Design

To identify potential application of GLP1-RAs (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) and SGLT2-Is (sodium-dependent glucose cotrasnsporter-2 inhibitors) in cardiovascular medicine, we performed PubMed search until March 31, 2020 and selected placebo-controlled randomized trials (RCTs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Twenty-four hour ambulatory and office blood pressure (BP), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and changes in glycated hemoglobin and body weight were aggregated across RCTs using random-effect models. In 2238 patients (7 RCTs), SGLT2-Is lowered 24-hour systolic/diastolic BP by 4.4/1.9 mm Hg (95% CI, 3.4-5.5/1.2-2.6 mm Hg), whereas 2 GLP1-RAs RCTs produced contradictory BP results. Over 1.3 to 5.4 years of follow-up of 56 004 patients (7 RCTs), aggregate hazard ratios associated with GLP1-RA treatment were 0.88 (0.84-0.93) for MACE, 0.84 (0.74-0.89) for CKD, and ranged from 0.84 to 0.90 for individual MACE end points (P≤0.01). Across 5 SGLT2-Is RCTs, including 43 467 patients with 1.5 to 4.2 years follow-up, hazard ratios were 0.87 (0.82-0.93) for MACE, 0.68 (0.62-0.75) for HF, 0.82 (0.72-0.93) for cardiovascular death, 0.87 (0.79-0.96) for myocardial infarction, and 0.61 (0.56-0.67) for worsening CKD. The risk of HF and CKD, but not MACE, decreased with more BP lowering. Stricter glycemic control was associated with higher HF risk, but unrelated to MACE or CKD. The aggregate effect sizes on systolic BP, body weight, and glycated hemoglobin were -1.61 mm Hg, -2.40 kg, and -0.69% for GLP1-RAs, and -2.53 mm Hg, -1.15 kg and -0.24%, for SGLT2-Is (P<0.001). In conclusion, GLP1-RAs and SGLT2-Is reduced cardiovascular risk with differential benefit profiles.