Predictors of acute outcomes for intensive residential treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

Responsiveness and other psychometric properties of the Y-BOCS Severity Scale-Second Edition (Y-BOCS-II) in a Dutch clinical sample

The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is a widely used clinician-rated interview to assess the presence and severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The scale is revised (Y-BOCS-II) to overcome several psychometric limitations, for example by extending the scoring for better discrimination within higher severity levels. The aim of the present study was to examine the responsiveness and other psychometric properties of the Y-BOCS-II Severity Scale in a Dutch clinical sample. The Y-BOCS-II is translated into Dutch (Y-BOCS-II) and administered to 110 patients seeking therapy for OCD. This was done twice, before and after treatment. The original Y-BOCS was simultaneously rated. Self-report measures regarding depression, symptom severity and OCD symptoms were assessed. The Y-BOCS-II has a good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.84), test-retest (ICC=0.89) and inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.98). The construct validity proved to be modest to good. The responsiveness over time was in favour of the Y-BOCS-II, compared with the YBOCS-I, particularly in the moderate-severely affected OCD patients. The Y-BOCS-II severity scale is a reliable and valid instrument for accurately assessing the severity of OCD symptoms and for measuring treatment-induced change. This second version also has clinical and psychometric advantages over the YBOCS-I. When these findings are sufficiently replicated, use of the YBOCS-II as the new common standard seems recommendable.

Predictors of Intensive Treatment in Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Background: Few studies have investigated which patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) do not recover through regular cognitive behavior therapy or pharmacotherapy and subsequently end up in intensive treatment like day treatment or inpatient treatment. Knowing the predictors of intensive treatment in these patients is significant because it could prevent intensive treatment. This study has identified predictors of intensive treatment in patients with OCD. Methods: Using 6-year longitudinal data of the Netherlands Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Association (NOCDA), potential predictors of intensive treatment were assessed in patients with OCD (n = 419). Intensive treatment was assessed using the Treatment Inventory Costs in Patients with Psychiatric Disorders (TIC-P). Examined potential predictors were: sociodemographics, and clinical and psychosocial characteristics. Logistic Generalized Estimating Equations was used to estimate to what extent the various characteristics (at baseline, 2- and 4-year assessment) predicted intensive treatment in the following 2 years, averaged over the three assessment periods. Results: Being single, more severe comorbid depression, use of psychotropic medication, and a low quality of life predicted intensive treatment in the following 2 years. Conclusions: Therapists should be aware that patients with OCD who are single, who have more severe comorbid depression, who use psychotropic medication, and who have a low quality of life or a drop in quality of life are at risk for intensive treatment. Intensive treatment might be prevented by focusing regular treatment not only on OCD symptoms but also on comorbid depression and on quality of life. Intensive treatment might be improved by providing extra support in treatment or by adjusting treatment to impairments due to comorbid depressive symptoms or a low quality of life.

New Directions for Surgical Ablation Treatment of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

Although there are effective treatments available for many, probably most, patients with OCD, a significant number do not respond, or fail to experience a sustained beneficial response. For patients with such chronic, disabling and 'treatment-refractory' OCD, neurosurgical treatments may be considered. The best-established neurosurgical treatments are so-called ablative procedures, where targeted lesions are created with the intention of interrupting and modifying specific circuitry functions. There is a lengthy history of such procedures and a substantial literature although this is largely of an observational nature. However, both stereotactic radiosurgery (gamma knife) and MR-guided high intensity focused ultrasound are methods of lesion generation that lend themselves to the conduct of blinded randomised trial designs and these are beginning to be utilised. In this chapter, we present a narrative review of the key recent literature that describes the evidence for the safety and efficacy of lesion procedures for OCD. For context, we also consider the strength and quality of evidence relating to intensive residential treatment for OCD (sometimes proposed as an alternative to neurosurgery), furthermore, we also present some comparative data for lesion surgery and deep brain stimulation (DBS).

Proof of Principle: Is a Pre-treatment Behavior Approach Test a Potential Predictor for Response to Intensive Residential Treatment in Patients With Treatment Refractory Obsessive Compulsive Disorder?

Patients with severe and treatment refractory obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) are usually referred to a specialized center for intensive residential treatment (IRT), consisting of exposure and response prevention (EX/RP), pharmacotherapy and additional therapies. About 50% of the patients does not respond to IRT. Currently we are not able to predict treatment response. If we were to have predictive tools, we could personify treatment at an earlier stage. Recent studies show that early adherence and willingness to EX/RP and low avoidance during EX/RP measured during treatment were associated with treatment response. In this observational study willingness and ability of patients with severe and treatment refractory OCD (N = 58) is conceptualized by a behavioral measurement, measured before the start of 12 weeks of IRT, using a Behavior Approach Test (BAT), as opposed to relying on self-report measurements. A medium or strong association between pre-treatment performance on the BAT and treatment response would justify next steps to test the BAT as a predictive tool for IRT. Results of regression analyses showed that there is a significant association between the performance on the BAT and change in OCD symptom severity after IRT. However, the effect-size is too small to use the BAT in its current form as predictor in clinical practice. The principle of the association between pre-treatment behaviorally measured willingness and ability to fully engage in EX/RP, and treatment response has now been proven. To ultimately design a predictive tool, future research is needed to refine a behavioral measurement of pre-treatment willingness and ability.