Quality of the therapeutic working alliance as a factor in intensive residential treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

OBJECTIVE

Intensive residential treatment (IRT) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) includes frequent meetings with a cognitive-behavioral therapist. We examined whether this therapeutic working alliance relates to IRT outcomes.

METHOD

Data came from a naturalistic sample of patients with OCD (n = 124) who received IRT at a specialty OCD clinic. Patients completed measures of OCD severity and well-being at admission and discharge. Both the patient and treating psychologist completed the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form (WAI-SF). Alliance ratings were tested as predictors in models predicting outcomes (discharge scores adjusting for baseline and treatment duration) as well as logistic regression predicting treatment response (≥35% symptom reduction in OCD symptoms).

RESULTS

Patient and clinician ratings of the quality of the alliance were weakly yet significantly correlated. Patient ratings of the alliance predicted outcomes, while therapist ratings did not. Moreover, greater discrepancy between patient and client ratings predicted worse outcomes. Patient ratings of the task dimension of the alliance uniquely related to responder status.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient perceptions of the working alliance, particularly as pertaining to agreement on therapeutic tasks, related to success with IRT for OCD. Further study is needed test interventions to improve task alliance as a strategy to enhance treatment.

Proof of Principle: Is a Pre-treatment Behavior Approach Test a Potential Predictor for Response to Intensive Residential Treatment in Patients With Treatment Refractory Obsessive Compulsive Disorder?

Patients with severe and treatment refractory obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) are usually referred to a specialized center for intensive residential treatment (IRT), consisting of exposure and response prevention (EX/RP), pharmacotherapy and additional therapies. About 50% of the patients does not respond to IRT. Currently we are not able to predict treatment response. If we were to have predictive tools, we could personify treatment at an earlier stage. Recent studies show that early adherence and willingness to EX/RP and low avoidance during EX/RP measured during treatment were associated with treatment response. In this observational study willingness and ability of patients with severe and treatment refractory OCD (N = 58) is conceptualized by a behavioral measurement, measured before the start of 12 weeks of IRT, using a Behavior Approach Test (BAT), as opposed to relying on self-report measurements. A medium or strong association between pre-treatment performance on the BAT and treatment response would justify next steps to test the BAT as a predictive tool for IRT. Results of regression analyses showed that there is a significant association between the performance on the BAT and change in OCD symptom severity after IRT. However, the effect-size is too small to use the BAT in its current form as predictor in clinical practice. The principle of the association between pre-treatment behaviorally measured willingness and ability to fully engage in EX/RP, and treatment response has now been proven. To ultimately design a predictive tool, future research is needed to refine a behavioral measurement of pre-treatment willingness and ability.

Predictors of acute outcomes for intensive residential treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

For those who suffer with chronic and disruptive obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), who have not been sufficiently helped by outpatient treatments or medications, intensive residential treatment (IRT) is often the next best treatment option. To date, research of the predictors of treatment outcome in IRT for OCD are mixed and sometimes contradictory. Additionally, although comorbidity is common for patients in this setting, the inclusion of comorbidity as a potential predictor of outcome has been mostly lacking in research to date. The current study aimed to address these issues by utilizing optimal indices of treatment outcomes, while incorporating comorbidity into our analyses, in order to identify the predictors of treatment outcomes in the IRT for OCD setting. To this end, we analysed outcome data from 379 patients receiving IRT for OCD at the Rogers Memorial OCD Center between August 2012, and December 2017. Results indicated that the most important predictor of treatment outcome was obsession severity at admission. Specifically, higher obsession severity at admission predicted poorer treatment outcomes at discharge. Clinical implications and suggestions for future research were discussed in the manuscript.