1
|
Adebayo G, Ayanda OI, Rottmann M, Ajibaye OS, Oduselu G, Mulindwa J, Ajani OO, Aina O, Mäser P, Adebiyi E. The Importance of Murine Models in Determining In Vivo Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy in Antimalarial Drug Discovery. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2025; 18:424. [PMID: 40143200 PMCID: PMC11944934 DOI: 10.3390/ph18030424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2025] [Revised: 03/10/2025] [Accepted: 03/13/2025] [Indexed: 03/28/2025] Open
Abstract
New chemical entities are constantly being investigated towards antimalarial drug discovery, and they require animal models for toxicity and efficacy testing. Murine models show physiological similarities to humans and are therefore indispensable in the search for novel antimalarial drugs. They provide a preclinical basis (following in vitro assessments of newly identified lead compounds) for further assessment in the drug development pipeline. Specific mouse strains, non-humanized and humanized, have successfully been infected with rodent Plasmodium species and the human Plasmodium species, respectively. Infected mice provide a platform for the assessment of treatment options being sought. In vivo pharmacokinetic evaluations are necessary when determining the fate of potential antimalarials in addition to the efficacy assessment of these chemical entities. This review describes the role of murine models in the drug development pipeline. It also explains some in vivo pharmacokinetic, safety, and efficacy parameters necessary for making appropriate choices of lead compounds in antimalarial drug discovery. Despite the advantages of murine models in antimalarial drug discovery, certain limitations are also highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glory Adebayo
- Covenant University Bioinformatics Research (CUBRe), Covenant University, Ota PMB 1023, Nigeria; (G.A.); (G.O.); (O.O.A.)
- Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science and Technology, Covenant University, Ota PMB 1023, Nigeria
- Biochemistry and Nutrition Division, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba PMB 2013, Nigeria; (O.S.A.); (O.A.)
| | - Opeyemi I. Ayanda
- Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science and Technology, Covenant University, Ota PMB 1023, Nigeria
| | - Matthias Rottmann
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, CH-4123 Allschwil, Switzerland; (M.R.); (P.M.)
| | - Olusola S. Ajibaye
- Biochemistry and Nutrition Division, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba PMB 2013, Nigeria; (O.S.A.); (O.A.)
| | - Gbolahan Oduselu
- Covenant University Bioinformatics Research (CUBRe), Covenant University, Ota PMB 1023, Nigeria; (G.A.); (G.O.); (O.O.A.)
- Department of Chemistry, College of Science and Technology, Covenant University, Ota PMB 1023, Nigeria
| | - Julius Mulindwa
- Department of Biochemistry and Sports Science, College of Natural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 7062, Uganda;
| | - Olayinka O. Ajani
- Covenant University Bioinformatics Research (CUBRe), Covenant University, Ota PMB 1023, Nigeria; (G.A.); (G.O.); (O.O.A.)
- Department of Chemistry, College of Science and Technology, Covenant University, Ota PMB 1023, Nigeria
| | - Oluwagbemiga Aina
- Biochemistry and Nutrition Division, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba PMB 2013, Nigeria; (O.S.A.); (O.A.)
| | - Pascal Mäser
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, CH-4123 Allschwil, Switzerland; (M.R.); (P.M.)
| | - Ezekiel Adebiyi
- Covenant University Bioinformatics Research (CUBRe), Covenant University, Ota PMB 1023, Nigeria; (G.A.); (G.O.); (O.O.A.)
- Division of Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- African Centre of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Data Intensive Science (ACE), Kampala P.O. Box 7062, Uganda
- Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 22418, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
James AD, Lanshoeft C, Steeno GS, Spracklin DK, You Z, Sharma R, Li XQ, Andersson LC, Piel I, Webb A, Doyle JM, Laboureur L, Da Violante G, Rizzo D, Siegrist YM. Cross-industry demonstration of the validity of the mixed matrix method for the assessment of cross-species exposure coverage of human circulating drug metabolites. Drug Metab Dispos 2025; 53:100041. [PMID: 40048992 DOI: 10.1016/j.dmd.2025.100041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2025] [Indexed: 03/30/2025] Open
Abstract
The mixed matrix method (MmM) is a widely used approach by the pharmaceutical industry for early assessment of whether exposures to major human circulating metabolites, of traditional small-molecule drugs, are adequately covered by the species used for toxicology assessment, which is a key requirement of the safety testing of drug metabolites (metabolites in safety testing guidelines). However, questions remain regarding its accuracy and utility in replacing conventional bioanalytical approaches. Furthermore, the available literature on the topic is not fully consistent in terms of how the assay should be conducted. As a result, encouraged by health authority advice on this topic, a cross-industry group under the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations was formed to: (1) further investigate the MmM accuracy, including a robust statistical analysis covering a diverse chemical space of commercially available drugs and drug candidates as well as their metabolites; (2) propose recommendations for best practice including a decision tree that the industry should consider when using the MmM; and (3) discuss whether the MmM could be used to support metabolites in safety testing assessment and could potentially be included into new drug application submissions without the need for additional measurements using the conventional bioanalytical approach. The outcome of this European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations assessment shows that MmM measured exposure ratios of 1.9 and 1.4 are statistically sufficient to demonstrate adequate exposure coverage of human metabolites above 50% or between 10% and 50% of drug-related exposure, respectively, by toxicology species. The aim is to encourage both industry and regulatory agencies to consider MmM as an acceptable approach to compare major human circulating metabolite exposures across species. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The outcome of our mixed matrix method assessment showed that measured exposure ratios of 1.9 and 1.4 are adequate to demonstrate coverage of human metabolites above or below 50% drug-related exposure by toxicology species. Recommendations for best practice and a decision tree for conducting metabolites in safety testing evaluations are proposed. Our investigations show that mixed matrix method data are sufficiently robust for the intended purpose and that the assay provides an opportunity to streamline drug development and reduce the need for resource-intensive bioanalysis and certain animal studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alison Webb
- GSK Research & Development Ltd, Stevenage, United Kingdom
| | - Janine M Doyle
- GSK Research & Development Ltd, Upper Providence, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | - Yves Martin Siegrist
- Pharma Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Savaryn JP, Coe K, Cerny MA, Colizza K, Moliner P, King L, Ma B, Atherton J, Auclair A, Cancilla MT, Eno M, Jurva U, Yue Q, Zhu SX, Freiberger E, Zhong G, Barlock B, Nachtigall J, Laboureur L, Pusalkar S, Guo R, Niehues M, Hauri S, Carreras ET, Maurer C, Prakash C, Jenkins GJ. The Current State of Biotransformation Science - Industry Survey of In Vitro and In Vivo Practices, Clinical Translation, and Future Trends. Pharm Res 2024; 41:2079-2093. [PMID: 39496990 PMCID: PMC11599300 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-024-03787-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 11/06/2024]
Abstract
Embedded within the field of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics (DMPK), biotransformation is a discipline that studies the origins, disposition, and structural identity of metabolites to provide a comprehensive safety assessment, including the assessment of exposure coverage in toxicological species. Spanning discovery and development, metabolite identification (metID) scientists employ various strategies and tools to address stage-specific questions aimed at guiding the maturation of early chemical matter into drug candidates. During this process, the identity of major (and minor) circulating human metabolites is ascertained to comply with the regulatory requirements such as the Metabolites in Safety Testing (MIST) guidance. Through the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ), the "Translatability of MetID In Vitro Systems Working Group" was created within the Translational and ADME Sciences Leadership Group. The remit of this group was to objectively determine how accurate commonly employed in vitro systems have been with respect to prediction of circulating human metabolites, both qualitatively and quantitatively. A survey composed of 34 questions was conducted across 26 pharmaceutical companies to obtain a foundational understanding of current metID practices, preclinically and clinically, as well as to provide perspective on how successful these practices have been at predicting circulating human metabolites. The results of this survey are presented as an initial snapshot of current industry-based metID practices, including our perspective on how a harmonized framework for the conduct of in vitro metID studies could be established. Future perspectives from current practices to emerging advances with greater translational capability are also provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Savaryn
- AbbVie, Quantitative, Translational & ADME Sciences, North Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Kevin Coe
- J&J, Translational PKPD & Investigational Toxicology, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Kevin Colizza
- GSK, DMPK Disposition and Biotransformation, Collegeville, PA, USA.
| | | | - Lloyd King
- UCB Biopharma, Dept. of DMPK, Slough, UK
| | - Bin Ma
- Genentech, Inc., Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jim Atherton
- Incyte Research Institute, Translational Sciences, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Adam Auclair
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Ridgefield, CT, USA
| | - Mark T Cancilla
- Merck & Co., Inc., Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics, Metabolism, and Bioanalysis, Rahway, NJ, USA
| | - Marsha Eno
- Eisai Inc., Global Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Ulrik Jurva
- AstraZeneca, Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics (DMPK), Research and Early Development, Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolism (CVRM), BioPharmaceuticals R&D, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Qin Yue
- Gilead Sciences, Inc., Drug Metabolism Dept, Foster City, CA, USA
| | - Sean Xiaochun Zhu
- Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics & Modeling, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Elyse Freiberger
- AbbVie, Quantitative, Translational & ADME Sciences, North Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Guo Zhong
- Amgen, Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism Department, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Runcong Guo
- Beigene, DMPK, Department of Biology, Shanghai, China
| | - Michael Niehues
- Bayer AG, In Vitro ADME & Isotope Chemistry, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Hauri
- Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ester Tor Carreras
- Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Chandra Prakash
- DMPK/Clinical Pharmacology, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Gary J Jenkins
- AbbVie, Quantitative, Translational & ADME Sciences, North Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|