1
|
Haak F, Nocera F, Merlo L, Dursunoglu B, Däster S, Angehrn FV, Steinemann DC. Omission of perioperative morphine reduces postoperative pain in proctological interventions: a single-center analysis. Updates Surg 2024; 76:155-161. [PMID: 37668891 PMCID: PMC10806230 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01640-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
There is an increase in outpatient procedures and this trend will continue in the future. For hemorrhoidectomy, it is the standard of treatment in many health care systems. Perioperative management including adequate pain control is of paramount importance to ensure successful ambulatory surgery. This study investigates the role and effect of morphine compared to short-acting opiates applied before, during, or after proctological interventions and with focus on hemorrhoidectomy. A retrospective analysis of a prospective database was conducted comparing two populations. The control cohort received morphine (Yes-Mô) intra- and postoperatively, while the intervention group did not receive morphine (No-Mô) between January 2018 and January 2020. Both cohorts were balanced by propensity score matching. The outcomes were postoperative pain measured by numeric ratings scale (NRS) one hour postoperatively, pain 24 h postoperatively, success rate of outpatient management, and complication rate including postoperative nausea and vomiting as well as urinary retention. The intervention population comprised 54 patients and the control group contained 79 patients. One hour after surgery, patients in No-Mô reported lower NRS (1.44 ± 1.41) compared to Yes-Mô (2.48 ± 2.30) (p = 0.029). However, there was no difference in NRS 24 h postoperatively (No-Mô: 1.61 ± 1.41 vs Yes-Mô: 1.63 ± 1.72; p = 0.738). 100% of No-Mô was managed as outpatients while only 50% of Yes-Mô was dismissed on the day of the operation (p = < 0.001). There was no difference in postoperative complications (including postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and urinary retention) between the two groups (PONV No-Mô 7.4% vs Yes-Mô 5.6%, p = 1.0 and urinary retention No-Mô 3.7% vs Yes-Mô 7.4%, p = 0.679). No-Mô received an oral morphine equivalent of 227.25 ± 140.35 mg intraoperatively and 11.02 ± 18.02 mg postoperatively. Yes-Mô received 263.17 ± 153.60 mg intraoperatively and 15.97 ± 14.17 mg postoperatively. The difference in received morphine equivalent between the groups was not significant after matching for the intraoperative (p = 0.212) and postoperative (p = 0.119) received equivalent. Omission of perioperative morphine is a viable but yet not understood method for reducing postoperative pain. Omission of morphine leads to a lower use of total morphine equivalent to attain satisfactory analgesia. The reduction of the overall opiate load and using opiates with a very short half-life potentially leads to a reduction of side effects like sedation. This in turn promotes discharge of the patient on the day of surgery. Omission of morphine is safe and does not increase postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Haak
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Postfach, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Fabio Nocera
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Postfach, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Lorena Merlo
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Postfach, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Belma Dursunoglu
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Postfach, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Silvio Däster
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Postfach, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Fiorenzo V Angehrn
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Postfach, 4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniel C Steinemann
- Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Postfach, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
- Medical Faculty, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The use of medications is common in elderly persons, and this population has the highest risk of medication-related problems. Elderly persons are more susceptible to the effects of various medications for a number of reasons. It is well known that polypharmacy is one of the most serious problems in caring for elderly persons; however, many of these patients continue to receive medications that have an increased risk of causing harm. In 1991, an important article was published about inappropriate medication use in the elderly population. This article raised awareness of the problem and presented explicit criteria for determining which medications were inappropriate for elderly patients residing in long-term care facilities. This list of drugs is still used for evaluating medications taken by elderly persons and for determining whether satisfactory prescribing practices are being used. We reviewed the medications described as inappropriate for elderly persons and searched the scientific literature to determine whether evidence exists to defend or refute the labeling of particular drugs. At times, evidence was difficult to find, and many of the original studies were dated. For most medications listed as inappropriate, we found evidence to support these designations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darryl S Chutka
- Division of Preventive and Occupational Medicine and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn 55905, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Max MB, Zeigler D, Shoaf SE, Craig E, Benjamin J, Li SH, Buzzanell C, Perez M, Ghosh BC. Effects of a single oral dose of desipramine on postoperative morphine analgesia. J Pain Symptom Manage 1992; 7:454-62. [PMID: 1287107 DOI: 10.1016/0885-3924(92)90131-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Drugs that block norepinephrine reuptake offer promise as opioid potentiators, because norepinephrine mediates opioid analgesia but not side effects such as sedation or nausea. In a two-by-two factorial design, we randomized 62 inpatients with pain following major surgery to receive either desipramine, 50 mg by mouth, or placebo at 6 a.m. on the first day after surgery. At their first request of pain medication after 8 a.m., they were given intravenous morphine, either 0.033 mg/kg or 0.10 mg/kg. Pain relief and side effects were assessed for 4 hr; peak relief on the visual analog scale (VAS) was the primary outcome variable. Pain relief, side effect scores, and time to remedication were significantly greater with the higher dose than with the lower dose of morphine, verifying assay sensitivity, but desipramine pretreatment did not significantly enhance morphine analgesia. The mean increase in peak VAS relief score after desipramine pretreatment, relative to placebo, was 6%; the 95% confidence interval for this estimate ranged from a 21% reduction to a 34% increase in pain relief. These results differ from a previous report that 1 week of pretreatment with desipramine, 75 mg per day, potentiated postoperative morphine analgesia. We conclude that if desipramine potentiation of opioid analgesia occurs in humans, its demonstration may require higher doses or chronic treatment.
Collapse
|
6
|
Poklis A, Mackell MA. Toxicological findings in deaths due to ingestion of pentazocine: a report of two cases. Forensic Sci Int 1982; 20:89-95. [PMID: 7095682 DOI: 10.1016/0379-0738(82)90112-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Two cases of fatal suicidal ingestion of pentazocine are presented. Toxicological findings in these deaths are compared to those of twelve similar pentazocine fatalities gleaned from various compilation of toxicology data. Pentazocine blood and liver concentrations in the presented cases were 3.3 and 9.2 mg/l, and 34 and 43 mg/kg, respectively. Blood and liver concentrations in references cases ranged from 0.8 - 38 mg/l and 3 - 197 mg/kg, respectively. The interpretation of toxicology findings following the ingestion of pentazocine is discussed.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Approximately equianalgesic oral doses of codeine, an oxycodone compound resembling Percodan, and pentazocine were compared for adverse effects in a double-blind, randomized study of four doses of each drug given over two days to 247 postsurgical patients with pain. Placebo and parenteral morphine were also treated as negative and positive controls, respectively. Approximately 50 patients each received one of the five drugs. Codeine, pentazocine, and morphine had the same incidence of adverse effects (22 to 28 per cent). One capsule of oxycodone compound was the analgesic equivalent of 12.5 mg morphine with an adverse effect incidence of 4 per cent (placebo 8 per cent). Smoking made no difference in analgesic effect or adverse effects. Analgesics given in the evening intervening between the two days may have affected the analgesic performance of placebo.
Collapse
|