Comparison of extraction sites versus artificial defects with xenogenic bone substitute in minipigs

Regeneration of alveolar bone defects in the experimental pig model: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Pigs are emerging as a preferred experimental in vivo model for bone regeneration. The study objective was to answer the focused PEO question: in the pig model (P), what is the capacity of experimental alveolar bone defects (E) for spontaneous regeneration in terms of new bone formation (O)?

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, electronic databases were searched for studies reporting experimental bone defects or extraction socket healing in the maxillae or mandibles of pigs. The main inclusion criteria were the presence of a control group of untreated defects/sockets and the assessment of regeneration via 3D tomography [radiographic defect fill (RDF)] or 2D histomorphometry [new bone formation (NBF)]. Random effects meta-analyses were performed for the outcomes RDF and NBF.

RESULTS

Overall, 45 studies were included reporting on alveolar bone defects or extraction sockets, most frequently in the mandibles of minipigs. Based on morphology, defects were broadly classified as 'box-defects' (BD) or 'cylinder-defects' (CD) with a wide range of healing times (10 days to 52 weeks). Meta-analyses revealed pooled estimates (with 95% confidence intervals) of 50% RDF (36.87%-63.15%) and 43.74% NBF (30.47%-57%) in BD, and 44% RDF (16.48%-71.61%) and 39.67% NBF (31.53%-47.81%) in CD, which were similar to estimates of socket-healing [48.74% RDF (40.35%-57.13%) and 38.73% NBF (28.57%-48.89%)]. Heterogeneity in the meta-analysis was high (I2 > 90%).

CONCLUSION

A substantial body of literature revealed a high capacity for spontaneous regeneration in experimental alveolar bone defects of (mini)pigs, which should be considered in future studies of bone regeneration in this animal model.

In Vitro Handling Characteristics of a Particulate Bone Substitute for Ridge Preservation Procedures

While particulate bone substitute materials are applied in a variety of augmentation procedures, standardized defects are being used for preclinical testing. This in vitro study evaluated the density and homogeneity of a particulate bone substitute in ridge preservation procedures. Premolars and molars were extracted in ten semimandibles of minipig cadavers. Light body impression material was used for determining the volume of the extraction sites followed by augmentation with particulate material, thereby weighing the graft material needed. Microradiographs and histologic sections were obtained for evaluating the homogeneity and density of the augmentation material. Statistical analyses were based on Shapiro-Wilk tests, Spearman's rho and one sample Wilcoxon test followed by Bonferroni-Holm correction for multiple testing (α = 0.05). Based on 103 single alveoli evaluated, the mean volume determined was 0.120 cm3 requiring a mean amount of graft material of 0.155 g. With only three exceptions, all parameters (volume, mass of augmentation material, density and homogeneity) correlated significantly (p < 0.020). The apical parts of the alveoli showed reduced density as compared to the middle parts (p < 0.001) and the homogeneity of the augmentation material was also lower as compared to the middle (p < 0.001) and cervical parts (p Collapse

Key Words

• alveolar ridge augmentation
• bone substitute materials
• ridge preservation

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Samira Dahl
Virgilia Klär-Quarz
Annika Schulz
Matthias Karl
Tanja Grobecker-Karl Department of Prosthodontics, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany; (S.D.); (V.K.-Q.); (A.S.); (M.K.)

Collapse

Comparison of extraction sites versus artificial defects with xenogenic bone substitute in minipigs

Objectives

The preclinical evaluation of bone substitutes is frequently performed in artificially created defects. However, such defects do not reflect the predominant clinical application of bone substitutes for socket preservation. Hence, the goal of this animal study was to compare the performance of a xenogenic bone substitute in extraction sites versus artificial defects.

Material and Methods

Four study sites each were created in the mandibles of four minipigs in the region of the third premolars and first molars, respectively. On one side, fresh extraction sockets were established while contralaterally trephine defects were created in healed alveolar bone. All sites were augmented using a particulate xenogenic bone substitute, covered by resorbable membranes and allowed to heal for 12 weeks. The amounts of new bone, non‐bone tissue and remaining bone substitute granules were quantified through histological and micro‐CT analysis. Comparative statistics were based on t‐tests for two samples and ANOVA with the level of significance set at α = 0.05.

Results

Histomorphometric data from only two animals could be quantitatively analyzed due to difficulty with identifying the surgical sites. The percentage of newly formed bone ranged between 53.2% ± 5.6% for artificial defects and 54.9% ± 12.4% for extraction sites. With the exception of ANOVA indicating a greater amount of non‐bone tissue in extraction sites as compared to artificial sites (p = 0.047), no statistically significant differences were observed. Micro‐CT scans showed patterns similar to the ones observed in histomorphometry. As extraction sites could be identified only in two micro‐CT reconstructions, quantitative assessment was not undertaken.

Conclusions

Despite the comparable performance of bone substitute material in artificial defects and extraction sites found here, the data gathered with this experiment was insufficient for showing equivalence of both approaches.