The flow cytometry myeloid progenitor count: A reproducible parameter for diagnosis and prognosis of myelodysplastic syndromes

Immunophenotyping myelodysplastic neoplasms: the role of flow cytometry in the molecular classification era

The unique heterogenous landscape of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) has resulted in continuous redefinition of disease sub-entities, in view of the novel translational research data that have clarified several areas of the pathogenesis and the progression of the disease. The new international classifications (WHO 2022, ICC 2022) have incorporated genomic data defining phenotypical alterations, that guide clinical management of specific patient subgroups. On the other hand, for over a decade, multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) has proven its value as a complementary diagnostic tool for these diseases and although it has never been established as a mandatory test for the baseline evaluation of MDS patients in international guidelines, it is almost universally adopted in everyday clinical practice for the assessment of suspected cytopenias through simplified scoring systems or elaborate analytical strategies for the detection of immunophenotypical dysplastic features in every hematopoietic cell lineage in the bone marrow (BM). In this review, we explore the clinically meaningful interplay of MFC data and genetic profiles of MDS patients, to reveal the currently existing and the potential future role of each methodology for routine clinical practice, and the benefit of the patients. We reviewed the existing knowledge and recent advances in the field and discuss how an integrated approach could lead to patient re-stratification and guide personalized management.

Myelodysplastic neoplasms dissected into indolent, leukaemic and unfavourable subtypes by computational clustering of haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) encompass haematological malignancies, which are characterised by dysplasia, ineffective haematopoiesis and the risk of progression towards acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Myelodysplastic neoplasms are notorious for their heterogeneity: clinical outcomes range from a near-normal life expectancy to leukaemic transformation or premature death due to cytopenia. The Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System made progress in the dissection of MDS by clinical outcomes. To contribute to the risk stratification of MDS by immunophenotypic profiles, this study performed computational clustering of flow cytometry data of CD34+ cells in 67 MDS, 67 AML patients and 49 controls. Our data revealed heterogeneity also within the MDS-derived CD34+ compartment. In MDS, maintenance of lymphoid progenitors and megakaryocytic-erythroid progenitors predicted favourable outcomes, whereas expansion of granulocyte-monocyte progenitors increased the risk of leukaemic transformation. The proliferation of haematopoietic stem cells and common myeloid progenitors with downregulated CD44 expression, suggestive of impaired haematopoietic differentiation, characterised a distinct MDS subtype with a poor overall survival. This exploratory study demonstrates the prognostic value of known and previously unexplored CD34+ populations and suggests the feasibility of dissecting MDS into a more indolent, a leukaemic and another unfavourable subtype.

Flow Cytometric Assessment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogeneous class of hematopoietic stem cell neoplasms characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis leading to peripheral cytopenias. This group of diseases is typically diagnosed using a combination of clinical, morphologic, and genetic criteria. Many studies have described the value of multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) in the diagnosis, classification, and prognostication of MDS. This review summarizes the approach to MDS diagnosis and immunophenotypic characterization using MFC and describes the current state while highlighting future opportunities and potential pitfalls.

Optimization of monocyte gating to quantify monocyte subsets for the diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

BACKGROUND

The presence of >94% classical monocytes (MO1, CD14++/CD16-) in peripheral blood (PB) has an excellent performance for the diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). However, the monocyte gating strategy is not well defined. The objective of the study was to compare monocyte gating strategies and propose an optimal one.

METHODS

This is a prospective, single center study assessing monocyte subsets in PB. First, we compared monocyte subsets using 13 monocyte gating strategies in 10 samples. Then we developed our own 10 color tube and tested it on 124 patients (normal white blood cell counts, reactive monocytosis, CMML and a spectrum of other myeloid malignancies). Both conventional and computational (FlowSOM) analyses were used.

RESULTS

Comparing different monocyte gating strategies, small but significant differences in %MO1 and percentually large differences in %MO3 (nonclassical monocytes) were found, suggesting that the monocyte gating strategy can impact monocyte subset quantification. Then, we designed a 10-color tube for this purpose (CD45/CD33/CD14/CD16/CD64/CD86/CD300/CD2/CD66c/CD56) and applied it to 124 patients. This tube allowed proper monocyte gating even in highly abnormal PB. Computational analysis found a higher %MO1 and lower %MO3 compared to conventional analysis. However, differences between conventional and computational analysis in both MO1 and MO3 were globally consistent and only minimal differences were observed when comparing the ranking of patients according to %MO1 or %MO3 obtained with the conventional versus the computational approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of monocyte gating strategy appears relevant for the monocyte subset distribution test. Our 10-color proposal allowed satisfactory monocyte gating even in highly abnormal PB. Computational analysis seems promising to increase reproducibility in monocyte subset quantification.

Diagnosis of erythroid dysplasia by flow cytometry: a review

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is complex. Flow cytometric analysis of the myelomonocytic compartment can be helpful, but it is highly subjective and reproducibility by non-specialized groups is unclear. Analysis of the erythroid lineage by flow cytometry is emerging as potentially more reproducible and easier to conduct, while keeping a high diagnostic performance.

AREAS COVERED

We review the evidence in this area, including 1) the use of well-established markers - CD71 and CD36 - and other less well-established markers and parameters; 2) the use of flow cytometric scores for the erythroid lineage; and 3) additional aspects, including the emergence of computational tools and the roles of flow cytometry beyond diagnosis. Finally, we discuss the limitations with the current evidence, including 1) the impact of the sample processing protocol and reagents on the results, 2) the lack of a standard gating strategy, and 3) conceptualization and design issues in the available publications.

EXPERT OPINION

We end by offering our recommendations for the current use - and our personal take on the value - of the analysis of erythroid lineage by flow cytometry.

Multiparameter flow cytometry in the evaluation of myelodysplasia: Analytical issues: Recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet/International Myelodysplastic Syndrome Flow Cytometry Working Group

Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) is one of the essential ancillary methods in bone marrow (BM) investigation of patients with cytopenia and suspected myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). MFC can also be applied in the follow-up of MDS patients undergoing treatment. This document summarizes recommendations from the International/European Leukemia Net Working Group for Flow Cytometry in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (ELN iMDS Flow) on the analytical issues in MFC for the diagnostic work-up of MDS. Recommendations for the analysis of several BM cell subsets such as myeloid precursors, maturing granulocytic and monocytic components and erythropoiesis are given. A core set of 17 markers identified as independently related to a cytomorphologic diagnosis of myelodysplasia is suggested as mandatory for MFC evaluation of BM in a patient with cytopenia. A myeloid precursor cell (CD34⁺ CD19^- ) count >3% should be considered immunophenotypically indicative of myelodysplasia. However, MFC results should always be evaluated as part of an integrated hematopathology work-up. Looking forward, several machine-learning-based analytical tools of interest should be applied in parallel to conventional analytical methods to investigate their usefulness in integrated diagnostics, risk stratification, and potentially even in the evaluation of response to therapy, based on MFC data. In addition, compiling large uniform datasets is desirable, as most of the machine-learning-based methods tend to perform better with larger numbers of investigated samples, especially in such a heterogeneous disease as MDS.