Seminal vesicle cell in a spontaneously voided urine

Primary Malignant Melanoma of the Genitourinary System: A Systemic Review and Report of Eight Cases

Malignant melanoma (MM) of mucosal membranes (excluding anus and head-neck) is a rare but aggressive disease with poor outcomes. The knowledge of this tumor's development, etiology, and management is scarce, mainly due to the low case numbers. We presented eight cases and performed a comprehensive literature review on mucosal MM (between 1970 and 2020). We identified 47 manuscripts on 55 patients with primary mucosal MM (limited to urothelium and vagina) and reviewed demographics, tumor specifications (morphology, stage, etc.), management, and survival. We identified 10 manuscripts discussing treatment in 1595 mucosal and non-mucosal MM and extracted the data regarding the non-surgical treatment modalities of mucosal MM patients. In 63 cases, 48 tumors primarily occurred in the urothelium (urethra: 47, bladder: 1) and 15 in the vagina. Molecular studies in a subset of cases revealed alterations in c-KIT, NRAS, BRAF (non-V600E and V600E), TP53, and NF1. Fifty-three patients underwent surgery (with additional chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy in 19, eight, and eight patients, respectively). The outcome was available in 52 cases, showing 21 deaths, 10 without recurrence, two alive with disease, and five lost to follow-up. Shared genetic signatures in mucosal and skin MM suggest a similar development mechanism; however, unlike skin MM, there are less BRAF mutations and more PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway alterations in mucosal MM. Prolonged chemotherapy (i.e., methotrexate) and immune-modulating agents (i.e., natalizumab) may be risk factors. The stage at diagnosis and proper surgical extirpation are keys to the prognosis and survival of patients.

The color of urine: then and now-a comprehensive review of the literature with emphasis on intracytoplasmic pigments encountered in urinary cytology

The color of urine, once considered by uroscopists to give the most important clues to the diagnosis, still can provide some diagnostic clues in modern medicine. Pigmented cells are an uncommon and surprising find in urine cytology and can at the same time provide important diagnostic clues or represent a dangerous pitfall. We present a review of the significance of pigmented cells in urine cytology. The presence of intracellular pigment granules; their color, size, shape, and variation in size and shape; as well as their staining reactions with special stains can provide useful diagnostic insight, especially when interpreted in the cytologic context (type of pigmented cell and its degree of atypicality) and patient's clinical context. The main differential diagnosis of cytoplasmic pigmented granules includes hemosiderin, lipofuscin, and melanin, each having a different pathogenesis and significance. The goal of this paper is to describe the morphological, histochemical, and ultrastructural characteristics of the pigments seen in urinary cytology, and to review the benign and malignant conditions associated with them.

What should not be reported as atypia in urine cytology

The term "atypia," although not well characterized, is widely used in diagnostic surgical and cytopathology. Because there are no guidelines regarding when to use this term, in the majority of cases, it is used as a "wastebasket." This definitely applies to urine cytology, where the reported rate of atypia ranges from 1.9% to 23%. This review lists a number of cytomorphologic findings in urine cytology that are associated with known and specific causes. Urine specimens in which the morphologic changes can be attributed to particular etiologic factors should no longer be classified as "atypical." These include urine specimens showing reactive umbrella cells or seminal vesicle cells, reactive changes due to stones, cytologic changes characteristic of infectious processes or therapy effect, instrumented urines with pseudopapillary clusters, and urinary diversion specimens.