Fine-needle aspiration of renal cell carcinoma: is accurate Fuhrman grading possible on cytologic material?

A systematic review on performance characteristics of FNA of renal lesions: It is time for a standardized classification system

BACKGROUND

The incidence of renal tumors has steadily increased over the past decade. In this study, the authors performed a systematic review and analysis of the literature on renal fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to determine its performance and explore whether a standardized classification system can be used for reporting renal FNA cytology.

METHODS

A systematic search of published articles on renal FNA was conducted. The data on FNA and histologic diagnosis were extracted and categorized, and the risk of malignancy was calculated. Different scenarios were used to estimate FNA performance statistics.

RESULTS

Of the 3766 potentially relevant studies, 23 met the inclusion criteria of the study. The 2231 FNA cases included were re-categorized according to the classification system, rendering 142 (6.36%) nondiagnostic, 270 (12.1%) nonneoplastic, 271 (12.14%) benign neoplasm, 65 (2.91%) renal neoplasm with unknown malignant potential, oncocytic type, 25 (1.12%) atypia of undetermined significance, 60 (2.68%) suspicious for malignancy, and 1398 (62.66%) malignant FNA diagnoses. The risk of malignancy in these cases was 65.4%, 18.1%, 16.6%, 16.9%, 60%, 73.3%, and 96.9%, respectively. According to the classification system, the study indicated that the accuracy of renal FNA was between 91% and 95%, the sensitivity was 90.9%-96.7%, and the specificity was 82%-92% in different scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for a standardized reporting in renal cytology that will improve the sensitivity and accuracy of renal cytology, reduce the rate of indeterminate diagnoses, and alter the management strategies of renal lesions. Based on the available literature, a new reporting system is proposed, including categories with an associated risk of malignancy.

Utility of cytopathologic diagnosis of adult solid renal lesions: An academic Institution's 10-year experience

BACKGROUND

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) and/or needle core biopsy (NCB) are increasingly used for managing patients with renal lesions, especially small renal masses (SRMs). One of the treatment options for SMRs is active surveillance. Hence, accurate diagnosis of renal lesions is critical for treatment planning. The aim of this study is to investigate the utility of FNA and/or NCB in the diagnosis of adult renal lesions at our institute.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Laboratory information system was queried over a period of 10 years (2011-2020) to identify cases of FNA and/or NCB with touch preparation (TP) of adult renal masses. Patient demographics, cytopathologic diagnoses, ancillary tests and follow-up surgical resection data were reviewed and correlated.

RESULTS

A total 138 cases from 138 patients (male = 80, female = 58) were identified. Sixty-one (44.20%) cases had FNA and NCB, 48 (34.78%) had NCB only and 29 (21.01%) had FNA only. 118 (85.50%) cases had definitive diagnoses and 13 (9.42%) had indeterminant diagnoses and seven cases were non-diagnostic (5.07%). Most common benign and malignant diagnoses were oncocytoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). 41/138 (29.71%) cases had follow-up resection. There were no false positive or false negative cases. Subtyping was feasible in majority cases with only 3/138 (2.17%) misclassified cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Majority of renal masses (85.50%) had definitive cytology diagnoses. Only three had misclassification. FNA and/or NCB are useful methods in diagnosing and subclassifying adult renal masses and showed high accuracy (91.89%) when compared to surgical resections.

Diagnostic accuracy of image-guided biopsies in small (<4 cm) renal masses with implications for active surveillance: a systematic review of the evidence

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the safety and diagnostic accuracy of renal tumour biopsies in a defined population of small renal masses (SRMs) only <4 cm using 3 × 2 table, intention to diagnose approach. 3 × 2 table approach examines indeterminate results as a separate category rather than pushing these through traditional 2 × 2 table (four-cell matrix) approach.

METHODS:

A highly sensitive search was performed in the Cochrane Library, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects; MEDLINE and MEDLINE in Process, EMBASE and conference proceedings (1966-2016) for the acquisition of data on the diagnostic accuracy and complications of RTB in patients with SRM <4 cm. Methodological quality and risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Test characteristics were calculated using conventional 2 × 2 contingency table analysis excluding non-diagnostic biopsies, and an intention-to-diagnose approach with a 3 × 2 table for pooled estimates of the sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS:

A total of 20 studies were included with a total sample size of 974. The pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity of RTB based upon univariate analysis using 2 × 2 table observed sensitivity 0.952 [confidence interval (CI) 0.908-0.979] and specificity 0.824 (CI 0.566-0.962). Using the 3 × 2 table and intention-to-diagnose principle, sensitivity 0.947 (CI 0.925-0.965) and specificity 0.609 (CI 0.385-0.803) decreased.

CONCLUSION:

RTB in SRMs (<4 cm) is associated with a high diagnostic sensitivity but poor specificity when non-diagnostic results are included by a 3 × 2 table for analysis (intention to diagnose approach). Risk of non-diagnostic results and poor quality of research need addressing through future studies, preferably by a well-designed prospective study appropriately powered for diagnostic accuracy using valid reference standards.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

A comprehensive synthesis of literature on image-guided biopsies in SRMs using a different methodology and study design.

A Pilot Study Evaluating Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Comparison of Ancillary Immunocytochemistry and Cytomorphological Characteristics of SurePath™ Liquid-Based Preparations with Conventional Smears

OBJECTIVE

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) based on a liquid-based preparation is a safe and valuable diagnostic tool. However, due to unfamiliarity with this method and the considerably altered morphology that is associated with it, diagnosing renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from this type of preparation remains a challenge for cytopathologists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytomorphological characteristics of SurePath™ (SP)-based preparations compared with conventional smear (CS), and also the role of SP-based FNAC in the diagnosis of clear-cell RCC (CRCC), the most common primary renal malignancy.

STUDY DESIGN

Ex vivo FNAC of both tumors and normal renal parenchyma was prepared from 73 cases. Comparative cytomorphological analysis between liquid-based cytology (LBC) and CS as well as Fuhrman nuclear grading (FNG) was carried out. Immunocytochemistry was performed from normal and CRCC cytology specimens.

RESULTS

Normal renal cytology (NRC) showed no significant morphological differences between LBC and CS. For CRCC, LBC showed small, fragmented cell clusters, a 3-dimensional configuration, distinct cytoplasmic vacuoles, and irregular nuclear contours when compared with CS. FNG was overgraded with LBC compared to with CS. AMACR was the most valuable immunocytochemical marker for distinguishing CRCC from NRC.

CONCLUSION

Once cytopathologists become familiar with the altered cytomorphological features of CRCC, FNAC, along with immunocytochemistry, may prove helpful for diagnosis.