Cytological evaluation by fine needle aspiration biopsy of incidental focal increased fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in thyroid on positron emission tomography scan

The dilemma of 18F-FDG PET/CT thyroid incidentaloma: what we should expect from FNA. A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

¹⁸F-FDG thyroid incidentaloma (TI) occurs in ~2% of PET/CT examinations with a cancer prevalence of up to 35-40%. Guidelines recommend fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNA) if a focal ¹⁸F-FDG TI corresponds to a sonographic nodule >1 cm. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide evidence-based data on the diagnostic distribution of ¹⁸F-FDG TIs in the six Bethesda systems for reporting thyroid cytopathology (BETHESDA) subcategories.

METHODS

Original studies reporting ¹⁸F-FDG TIs and cytologically classified according to BETHESDA were included. Six separate meta-analyses were performed to obtain the pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval, 95% CI) of ¹⁸F-FDG TIs in the six BETHESDA subcategories.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were finally included. Nine studies were from Asian/Eastern and six from Western countries. FNA data according to BETHESDA was available in 2304 cases. The pooled prevalence of ¹⁸F-FDG TIs according to BETHESDA was BETHESDA I 10% (6-14), BETHESDA II 45% (37-53), BETHESDA III 8% (3-13), BETHESDA IV 8% (5-12), BETHESDA V 6% (4-9), BETHESDA VI 19% (13-25). A significantly different prevalence was found in the BETHESDA IV between Asian/Eastern (2%) and Western (19%) studies.

CONCLUSION

Two-thirds of focal ¹⁸F-FDG TIs undergoing FNA have either malignant (BETHESDA VI) or benign (BETHESDA II) cytology while a minority will have indeterminate (BETHESDA III or IV) FNA results. Significant differences between Asian/Eastern and Western studies are also present in the prevalence of indeterminate FNA results.

Focal Thyroid Incidentalomas on 18F-FDG PET/CT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Prevalence, Risk of Malignancy and Inconclusive Fine Needle Aspiration

BACKGROUND

The rising demand for ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) has led to an increase of thyroid incidentalomas. Current guidelines are restricted in giving options to tailor diagnostics and to suit the individual patient.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed at exploring the extent of potential overdiagnostics by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on the prevalence, the risk of malignancy (ROM) and the risk of inconclusive FNAC (ROIF) of focal thyroid incidentalomas (FTI) on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search in MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science was performed to identify relevant studies.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies providing information on the prevalence and/or ROM of FTI on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in patients with no prior history of thyroid disease were selected by two authors independently. Sixty-one studies met the inclusion criteria.

DATA ANALYSIS

A random effects meta-analysis on prevalence, ROM and ROIF with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was performed. Heterogeneity and publication bias were tested. Risk of bias was assessed using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fifty studies were suitable for prevalence analysis. In total, 12,943 FTI were identified in 640,616 patients. The pooled prevalence was 2.22% (95% CI = 1.90% - 2.54%, I² = 99%). 5151 FTI had cyto- or histopathology results available. The pooled ROM was 30.8% (95% CI = 28.1% - 33.4%, I² = 57%). 1308 (83%) of malignant nodules were papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The pooled ROIF was 20.8% (95% CI = 13.7% - 27.9%, I² = 92%).

LIMITATIONS

The main limitations were the low to moderate methodological quality of the studies and the moderate to high heterogeneity of the results.

CONCLUSION

FTI are a common finding on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CTs. Nodules are malignant in approximately one third of the cases, with the majority being PTC. Cytology results are non-diagnostic or indeterminate in one fifth of FNACs. These findings reveal the potential risk of overdiagnostics of FTI and emphasize that the workup of FTI should be performed within the context of the patient's disease and that guidelines should adopt this patient tailored approach.

Diagnostic Performance of Different Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (Kwak-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS and ACR TI-RADS) for Risk Stratification of Small Thyroid Nodules (≤10 mm)

Due to the widespread use of ultrasound, small thyroid nodules (TNs) ≤ 10 mm are common findings. Standardized approaches for the risk stratification of TNs with Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS) were evaluated for the clinical routine. With TIRADS, the risk of malignancy in TNs is calculated by scoring the number or combination of suspicious ultrasound features, leading to recommendations for further diagnostic steps. However, there are only scarce data on the performance of TIRADS for small TNs. The aim was to compare three different TIRADS for risk stratification of small TNs in routine clinical practice. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of TNs ≤ 10 mm and their available histology. Nodules were classified according to three different TIRADS. In the study, 140 patients (n = 113 female) with 145 thyroid nodules (n = 76 malignant) were included. Most of the malignant nodules were papillary carcinoma (97%), and the remaining 3% were medullary carcinoma. For all tested TIRADS, the prevalence of malignancy rose with increasing category levels. The highest negative predictive value was found for ACR TI-RADS and the highest positive predictive value for Kwak-TIRADS. All tested variants of TIRADS showed comparable diagnostic performance for the risk stratification of small TNs. TIRADS seems to be a promising tool to reliably assess the risk of malignancy of small TNs.

Risk of Malignancy in FDG-Avid Thyroid Incidentalomas on PET/CT: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Due to a substantial risk of malignancy, patients with focal FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas (FFTIs) on PET/CT are in most of Denmark referred to Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) fast track programs. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of malignancy in FFTI managed in a HNC fast track program.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study including all patients with FFTI referred to the HNC fast track program, Odense University Hospital between September 1, 2016 and August 31, 2017. Ultrasonography (US) and fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) were intended to be done in all patients. Nodules with cytology of Bethesda 1, 3, 4, 5, or 6 were planned for surgical removal.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were included. All patients had US and 101 patients (97%) had FNAB. Forty-two patients had benign cytology classified as Bethesda 2. The remaining 62 patients underwent surgery except from 11 patients, mainly due to comorbidity. The overall risk of malignancy for patients with FFTI referred to our HNC fast track program was calculated to be 24% (23/95) based on patients with unequivocal cytology and/or histology. The only statistically significant US characteristic to predict malignancy was the appearance of irregular margins with a sensitivity of 47% and specificity of 96%.

CONCLUSION

The risk of malignancy of FFTIs handled in our HNC fast track program is 24%.

Computer-Aided Diagnostic Technique in 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose-Positive Thyroid Nodule: Clinical Experience of 74 Non-thyroid Cancer Patients

This study verified the value of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) technique assisting in ultrasonography (US) diagnosis of 2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-D-glucose (¹⁸FDG)-avid thyroid incidentalomas on positron emission tomography. A total of 82 ¹⁸FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas from 74 non-thyroid cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed with respect to US and CAD parameters (anechoic area, hyper-echoic foci, hypo-echogenicity, heterogeneity, margin, taller-than-wide shape, eccentric area) and were compared with 38 other non-¹⁸FDG-avid nodules found in the same patient group. Fine-needle aspiration cytology or surgical intervention pathology was performed for diagnosis. No significant differences in nodule size or CAD parameters were found in ¹⁸FDG-avid nodules reported as benign, indeterminate or malignant. Significantly more taller-than-wide nodules were thyroid originating than metastatic (0.30 vs. 0.16, p < 0.05). Nevertheless, combined CAD and positron emission tomography/computed tomography scores and a discrimination point of 4 resulted in a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 80% in prediction of incidentaloma benignity.

Incidental Findings on FDG PET/CT in Head and Neck Cancer

Objective

18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) imaging is common in head and neck cancer and often identifies incidental findings that necessitate additional patient evaluations. Our goal was to assess the frequency and nature of these incidental imaging findings on FDG-PET/CT.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary medical center.

Subjects and Methods

All patients with head and neck cancer who had undergone FDG-PET/CT imaging between January 2014 and June 2015 at our institution were evaluated for incidental findings.

Results

A total of 293 patients met criteria; more than one-third (n = 103) had at least 1 finding unrelated to their head and neck cancer, for a total of 134 incidental findings. Incidental findings within the head and neck (33.5% of all) excluding the thyroid were most common: 35% incidental findings were concerning for malignancy; of these, 25.5% were malignant with further workup. Recommendations were given by the head and neck radiologist on 72 (53.7%) findings: 74.5% of potentially malignant findings and 42.5% of benign findings had recommendations for follow-up. Significantly more patients with findings described as malignant were given recommendations for follow-up ( P = .0004).

Conclusion

Incidental findings on FDG-PET/CT are present in more than one-third of patients with head and neck cancer. More than one-third of incidental findings were concerning for malignancy. This study illustrates how the incidental findings discovered on FDG PET/CT frequently necessitate additional evaluations unrelated to the index head and neck cancer. The impact of these additional assessments on the cost and quality of health care warrants future evaluation.