Sex differences in luteinizing hormone releasing hormone-induced conditioned place preference in the rat

Trends in place preference conditioning with a cross-indexed bibliography; 1957-1991

The purpose of this work is to present a perspective of the conditioned place preference (CPP) test by offering an overview of the empirical research from 1957-1991. The intent is not to extensively analyze the controversies inherent to any behavioral technique but rather to present a survey of research using a descriptive statistics approach to explore topical issues. The objectives of this work are three-fold: (a) to provide an exhaustive bibliography of the CPP literature including articles, journal abstracts, book chapters and critical reviews; (b) to provide a cross-index of identified key words/drugs tested; and (c) to give an overview of selected procedural issues underlying CPP testing.

Temporal characteristics of appetitive stimulus effects of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone in male rats

Conditioned place preference, induced by intraperitoneal injections of 5 micrograms/kg luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), was studied by varying the interval between the injection of LHRH and the conditioning sessions. Place preference was investigated for five presession intervals (0, 15, 45, 75, and 120 min) in separate groups of gonadectomized male rats provided with a subcutaneous testosterone implant. It was shown that the presession interval is an important parameter in the development of LHRH-induced conditioned place preference. Place preference was not observed after conditioning with intervals of 0, 75, and 120 min. With 15 and 45 min, however, a reliable preference was induced by LHRH. This study provides insight into the onset and offset of the appetitive stimulus properties of LHRH in male rats.

Dose-dependent and time-related stimulus properties of LHRH in male but not in female rats

Male and female rats (N = 32) were trained to discriminate 5 micrograms/kg LHRH from saline in a two-lever, food-reinforced drug discrimination procedure with injection-session intervals of 15 min or 45 min. When the interval was 15 min, neither males nor females were able to discriminate the stimulus conditions. With an interval of 45 min, LHRH showed sex-dependent stimulus properties. Male, but not female, rats reliably discriminated LHRH from saline within 50 training sessions. In males, generalization tests showed dose-dependent and time-related stimulus effects of LHRH (doses ranged from 62.5 ng/kg to 8 micrograms/kg, and intervals ranged from -15 min to -120 min). The results indicate that LHRH may be an essential part of the stimulus complex in male rats but could not gain control over operant behavior in female rats.

Hypothalamic involvement in sexuality and hostility: comparative psychological aspects

Evidence presented in this article shows the representation of sexual and aggressive behaviors at the level of the hypothalamus to be more prominent than in all other brain areas involved. Indeed, there are good arguments to attribute a central position to the hypothalamus within larger structural systems encompassing the limbic system, where aspects of the behaviors involved can be influenced. So far, however, the arguments are purely descriptive and factual and do not contribute much to answering questions about hypothalamic function: the grounds for and consequences of this massive representation of apparently almost all emotionally relevant social behavioral complexes, so universally established in a diversity of species, still has to be detected. A second and equally important aspect of hypothalamic function obviously has to be related to its central position within various hormonal systems. The present article concentrated on the acute dynamics and behavioral significance of activation of the pituitary-adrenocortical and pituitary-gonadal axes. Evidence indicates that the unconditioned behavioral stimuli or the consequences of behavior, but also stimuli conditioned to emotionally relevant events, may drastically alter hypothalamic hormonal regulation. Most importantly, these hormonal consequences in themselves again seem to determine further behavior and responses in relevant situations. The evidence presented with respect to reward and aversion, associated with alterations of specific hormones of the gonadal axis, may add a new dimension to our understanding of psychoendocrine functions of the hypothalamus (see also Gary, 1975; Leshner et al., 1981; Carey, 1987). Psychologically, such data can be taken as an argument for a more thorough study of the relation between memory processes and emotion (Bower et al., 1981). However fragmentary and incomplete this review may be, it will be clear that hypothalamic substrates and directly related areas, as well as affiliated hormonal mechanisms, play a central role in many of the most complex motivational and emotional syndromes and disorders. The prime idea in this is that the psychological concomitants of hypothalamic (dys)function are as much output as input, and as much the consequences as the cause within related syndromes. Such a view places the hypothalamus at the core of psychological theories of emotion and motivation, which from their most early origin have been heavily set towards hormonal and humoral changes and their relationships with psychological experience.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)