Developmental motor function plays a key role in visual search

Influence of sleep on motor skill acquisition in children: a systematic review

Effects of sleep on procedural (implicit) memory consolidation in children remain controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence on the influence of sleep on motor skills acquisition in children. Four electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), and Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS). Original studies, published until October 17, 2023, on motor skill acquisition in children aged ≤12 years, in which the intervention group slept after motor skill training, while the control group remained awake, were considered for inclusion. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool. The review protocol was pre-registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO protocol number: CRD42022363868) and all reported items followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Of the 7241 articles initially retrieved, nine met the primary criteria and were included in this review. Of these, six studies reported that daytime or night-time sleep intervention improved motor skill acquisition, as compared to wakefulness. All studies presented a high risk of bias. In conclusion, the evidence summarised suggests that sleep may enhance motor skills acquisition and could be important for motor development in childhood. However, due to the high risk of bias in the included studies, future randomised controlled trials with high methodological quality are necessary to better clarify this topic.

Motor learning alters vision, but vision does not alter motor learning

During visuomotor learning, improvements in motor performance accompany changes in how people use vision. However, the dependencies between altered visual reliance and improvements in motor skill is unclear. The present studies used an online sequence learning task to quantify how changing the availability of visual information affected motor skill learning (study 1) and how changing motor skill affected visual reliance (study 2). Participants used their keyboard to respond to targets falling vertically down a game screen. In study 1 (n = 49), the availability of visual information was altered by manipulating where the targets were visible on the screen. Three experimental groups practiced the task during full or limited vision conditions (when the targets were only visible in specific areas). We hypothesized that limiting visual information would reduce motor learning (i.e., the rate of improvement during training trial blocks). Instead, although participants performed worse during limited vision trials (P < 0.001), there was no difference in learning rate (P = 0.87). In study 2 (n = 119), all participants practiced the task with full vision and their visual reliance (i.e., their performance change between full and limited vision conditions) was quantified before and after training. We hypothesized that with motor learning, visual reliance on future targets would increase, whereas visual reliance on the current targets would decrease. The results of study 2 partially support our hypotheses with visual reliance decreasing for all visual areas (P < 0.001). Together, the results suggest changing motor skill alters how people use vision, but changing visual availability does not affect motor learning.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous research has established how people use visual information changes with motor learning. However, the dependencies of these two processes on each other are unclear. We find that limiting the availability of visual information degrades motor performance but not motor learning. We also find that motor learning reduces the impact of limiting the availability of visual information on motor performance. Together, these results suggest that how people use visual information depends on their motor skill.

Children benefit differently from night- and day-time sleep in motor learning

Motor skill acquisition occurs while practicing (on-line) and when asleep or awake (off-line). However, developmental questions still remain about whether children of various ages benefit similarly or differentially from night- and day-time sleeping. The likely circadian effects (time-of-day) and the possible between-test-interference (order effects) associated with children's off-line motor learning are currently unknown. Therefore, this study examines the contributions of over-night sleeping and mid-day napping to procedural skill learning. One hundred and eight children were instructed to practice a finger sequence task using computer keyboards. After an equivalent 11-h interval in one of the three states (sleep, nap, wakefulness), children performed the same sequence in retention tests and a novel sequence in transfer tests. Changes in the movement time and sequence accuracy were evaluated between ages (6-7, 8-9, 10-11years) during practice, and from skill training to retrievals across three states. Results suggest that night-time sleeping and day-time napping improved the tapping speed, especially for the 6-year-olds. The circadian factor did not affect off-line motor learning in children. The interference between the two counter-balanced retrieval tests was not found for the off-line motor learning. This research offers possible evidence about the age-related motor learning characteristics in children and a potential means for enhancing developmental motor skills. The dynamics between age, experience, memory formation, and the theoretical implications of motor skill acquisition are discussed.

Inhibitory Control Differentiates Rare Target Search Performance in Children

Age-related differences in rare-target search are primarily explained by the speed-accuracy trade-off, primed responses, or decision making. The goal was to examine how motor inhibition influences visual search. Children pressed a key when a rare target was detected. On no-target trials, children withheld reactions. Response time (RT), hits, misses, correct rejection, and false alarms were measured. Tapping tests assessed motor control. Older children tapped faster, were more sensitive to rare targets (higher d'), and reacted more slowly than younger ones. Girls outperformed boys in search sensitivity but not in RT. Motor speed was closely associated with hit rate and RT. Results suggest that development of inhibitory control plays a key role in visual detection. The potential implications for cognitive-motor development and individual differences are discussed.