Expression of the heparan sulfate 6-O-endosulfatases, Sulf1 and Sulf2, in the avian and mammalian inner ear suggests a role for sulfation during inner ear development

BACKGROUND

Inner ear morphogenesis is tightly regulated by the temporally and spatially coordinated action of signaling ligands and their receptors. Ligand-receptor interactions are influenced by heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), cell surface molecules that consist of glycosaminoglycan chains bound to a protein core. Diversity in the sulfation pattern within glycosaminoglycan chains creates binding sites for numerous cell signaling factors, whose activities and distribution are modified by their association with HSPGs.

RESULTS

Here we describe the expression patterns of two extracellular 6-O-endosulfatases, Sulf1 and Sulf2, whose activity modifies the 6-O-sulfation pattern of HSPGs. We use in situ hybridization to determine the temporal and spatial distribution of transcripts during the development of the chick and mouse inner ear. We also use immunocytochemistry to determine the cellular localization of Sulf1 and Sulf2 within the sensory epithelia. Furthermore, we analyze the organ of Corti in Sulf1/Sulf2 double knockout mice and describe an increase in the number of mechanosensory hair cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the tuning of intracellular signaling, mediated by Sulf activity, plays an important role in the development of the inner ear.

Sulf1 and Sulf2 expression in the nervous system and its role in limiting neurite outgrowth in vitro

Sulf1 and Sulf2 are endosulfatases that cleave 6-O-sulphate groups from Heparan Sulphate Proteoglycans (HSPGs). Sulfation levels of HSPGs are critical for their role in modulating the activity of various growth factor receptors. Sulf1 and Sulf2 mRNAs were found to be widely expressed in the rodent nervous system and their full-length proteins were found in many types of neuronal perikarya and axons in the cerebral cortex, cerebellum, spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) of adult rats. Sulf1/2 were also strongly expressed by cultured DRG neurons. To determine if blocking Sulf1 or Sulf2 activity affected neurite outgrowth in vitro, cultured DRG neurons were treated with neutralising antibodies to Sulf1 or Sulf2. Blocking Sulf1 and Sulf2 activity did not affect neurite outgrowth from cultured DRG neurons grown on a laminin/polylysine substrate but ameliorated the inhibitory effects of chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans (CSPGs) on neurite outgrowth. Blocking epidermal growth factor receptor (ErbB1) activity also improved neurite outgrowth in the presence of CSPGs, but the effects of ErbB1 antagonists and blocking SULFs were not additive. It is proposed that Sulf1, Sulf2 and ErbB1 are involved in the signalling pathway from CSPGs that leads to inhibition of neurite outgrowth and may regulate structural plasticity and regeneration in the nervous system.

FGF8 signaling is chemotactic for cardiac neural crest cells

Cardiac neural crest cells migrate into the pharyngeal arches where they support development of the pharyngeal arch arteries. The pharyngeal endoderm and ectoderm both express high levels of FGF8. We hypothesized that FGF8 is chemotactic for cardiac crest cells. To begin testing this hypothesis, cardiac crest was explanted for migration assays under various conditions. Cardiac neural crest cells migrated more in response to FGF8. Single cell tracing indicated that this was not due to proliferation and subsequent transwell assays showed that the cells migrate toward an FGF8 source. The migratory response was mediated by FGF receptors (FGFR) 1 and 3 and MAPK/ERK intracellular signaling. To test whether FGF8 is chemokinetic and/or chemotactic in vivo, dominant negative FGFR1 was electroporated into the premigratory cardiac neural crest. Cells expressing the dominant negative receptor migrated slower than normal cardiac neural crest cells and were prone to remain in the vicinity of the neural tube and die. Treating with the FGFR1 inhibitor, SU5402 or an FGFR3 function-blocking antibody also slowed neural crest migration. FGF8 over-signaling enhanced neural crest migration. Neural crest cells migrated to an FGF8-soaked bead placed dorsal to the pharynx. Finally, an FGF8 producing plasmid was electroporated into an ectopic site in the ventral pharyngeal endoderm. The FGF8 producing cells attracted a thick layer of mesenchymal cells. DiI labeling of the neural crest as well as quail-to-chick neural crest chimeras showed that neural crest cells migrated to and around the ectopic site of FGF8 expression. These results showing that FGF8 is chemotactic and chemokinetic for cardiac neural crest adds another dimension to understanding the relationship of FGF8 and cardiac neural crest in cardiovascular defects.