The diagnosis of avoidant restrictive food intake disorder in the presence of gastrointestinal disorders: Opportunities to define shared mechanisms of symptom expression

A Multicenter Study to Assess Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Disordered eating is frequently reported in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to describe the prevalence of avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in patients with IBD and to identify predictors of ARFID.

METHODS

Patients with IBD at 2 academic medical centers completed questionnaires including the ARFID subscale of the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Questionnaire (PARDI-AR-Q), disease characteristics, and psychosocial variables. IBD disease activity was determined by a review of objective data within 90 days of survey completion.

RESULTS

Three hundred and twenty-five participants completed the questionnaires (56% female, average age 47.60 years, 49.5% Crohn's disease (CD), 45.5% ulcerative colitis (UC)). Using the PARDI-AR-Q, 17.8% of the total sample screened positive for ARFID. ARFID+ respondents were younger, had shorter disease duration, and worse psychosocial functioning compared to ARFID-. A higher percentage of ARFID+ patients had objective disease activity compared to ARFID- (51% vs. 40%), but this was not statistically significant. There was no statistical difference in ARFID rates between patients with CD compared to UC. In patients with inactive disease only, 16.3% screened positive for ARFID. In hierarchical logistic regression, the only significant predictor of ARFID among patients with inactive IBD was GI-specific anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multi-center study, 16.3% of patients with inactive IBD met the criteria for ARFID, and 17.8% of all patients met the criteria regardless of objective disease activity. GI-specific anxiety was the only predictor of ARFID among patients with inactive IBD, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary care in IBD.

Mental and Somatic Conditions in Children With the Broad Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Phenotype

Importance

Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a feeding and eating disorder characterized by limited variety and/or quantity of food intake impacting physical health and psychosocial functioning. Children with ARFID often present with diverse psychiatric and somatic symptoms and therefore consult various pediatric subspecialties. Large-scale studies mapping coexisting conditions are, however, lacking.

Objective

To characterize the health care needs of youth with ARFID.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used the Child and Adolescent Twin Study in Sweden (CATSS), in combination with inpatient and specialized outpatient clinical diagnoses from the Swedish National Patient Register. Data were collected from July 2004 to April 2020, and data were analyzed from September 2022 to February 2024.

Exposure

Using a composite measure derived from parent or guardian reports and register data, children with the broad ARFID phenotype occurring between the ages of 6 to 12 years were identified, as well as children without ARFID.

Main Outcomes and Measures

From more than 1000 diagnostic International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, mental and somatic conditions within or across ICD chapters, the number of distinct per-person diagnoses, and inpatient treatment days between participants' birth and 18th birthdays were specified (90 outcomes). Hazard ratios (HRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated.

Results

Of 30 795 CATSS participants, a total of 616 children (2.0%) with the broad ARFID phenotype occurring between the ages of 6 to 12 years were identified, and 30 179 children without ARFID were identified. Of 616 children with ARFID, 241 children were female (39.1%). Relative risks of neurodevelopmental, gastrointestinal, endocrine or metabolic, respiratory, neurological, and allergic disorders were substantially increased in children with ARFID (eg, autism: HR, 9.7; 95% CI, 7.5-12.5; intellectual disability: HR, 10.3; 95% CI, 7.6-13.9; gastroesophageal reflux disease: HR, 6.7; 95% CI, 4.6-9.9; pituitary conditions: HR, 5.6; 95% CI, 2.7-11.3; chronic lower respiratory diseases: HR, 4.9; 95% CI, 2.4-10.1; and epilepsy: HR, 5.8; 95% CI, 4.1-8.2). ARFID was not associated with elevated risks of autoimmune illnesses and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Children with ARFID had significantly more distinct mental diagnoses (IRR, 4.7; 95% CI, 4.0-5.4) and longer hospital stays (IRR, 5.5; 95% CI, 1.7-17.6) compared with children without ARFID. Children with ARFID were diagnosed with a mental condition earlier than children without ARFID. No sex-specific differences emerged.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study yields the broadest and most detailed evidence of coexisting mental and somatic conditions in the largest sample of children with ARFID to date. Findings suggest a complex pattern of health needs in youth with ARFID, underscoring the critical importance of attention to the illness across all pediatric specialties.

The Association of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) and Neurogastroenterology Disorders (Including Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction [DGBI]): A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Patients with neurogastroenterology disorders like disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) and gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders often adopt restrictive diets to manage symptoms. Without professional guidance, these patients may risk developing avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), potentially affecting their physical and mental health.

PURPOSE

This scoping review aimed to explore the prevalence of ARFID in patients with neurogastroenterology disorders and vice versa, the direction of their association, potential risk factors, and available treatments.

METHODS

Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Abstracts were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers.

KEY RESULTS

Eighteen studies met our inclusion criteria. The prevalence of ARFID symptoms in neurogastroenterology patients ranged from 10% to 80%, while the prevalence of neurogastroenterology disorders and related GI symptoms in ARFID patients ranged from 7% to 60%. Findings on the direction of the association between eating difficulties and GI symptom occurrence were conflicting. Patients with ARFID-neurogastroenterology disorder overlap were more likely to be female, have a lower BMI, higher anxiety and depression levels, and poorer quality of life. Two small studies evaluating treatment for this overlap suggested promising effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

This review highlights heterogeneity in study designs and questions the suitability of ARFID assessment tools in this context. It also underscores gaps in understanding the underlying pathophysiology and treatment approaches. Future research should prioritize validating ARFID screening tools specific to this population and standardizing study methodologies. Improved understanding of this overlap will help healthcare professionals improve management strategies and patient outcomes.

Virtually delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (CBT-AR): a case study in an adult with elevated autistic traits

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Avoidant and Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (CBT-AR; ARIFD) is a psychological treatment that targets many of the core symptoms of ARFID. Although a growing literature supports the efficacy of behavioural interventions for paediatric feeding and eating disorders, including ARFID, the applicability of these methods to adults remains undetermined. Telehealth delivery of CBT-AR in adults with autism has yet to be tested. With this study, we conduct a preliminary evaluation of CBT-AR delivered virtually to a 26-year-old white British female, with mixed ARFID and elevated autistic traits. She attended 23 remote CBT-AR sessions facilitated through a dedicated telehealth platform. Adjustments were made to accommodate her lived experience of neurodiversity. Using a pre-post treatment design, changes on measures of subjective goal attainment, eating-related and general psychosocial impairment, general anxiety, and depression were evaluated. Following treatment, the participant had made significant progress towards personally meaningful goals, with improvements observed in nutritional intake, general well-being, and reductions in eating-related psychosocial impairment and general anxiety. The results offer preliminary insights into acceptability and efficacy of virtual CBT-AR for neurodiverse individuals.

Empirical Approaches to the Classification of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder

OBJECTIVE

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a relatively new formal diagnosis for which empirical classification research (defined here as studies using latent class/latent profile analysis-type methods) is still emerging. Such research focused on ARFID is an important gap to fill given questions about (1) the boundaries between ARFID and phenotypically similar presentations (e.g., eating disorders [EDs] such as anorexia nervosa [AN], and pediatric feeding disorder [PFD]), and (2) within-ARFID heterogeneity. These questions have practical implications, including diagnostic reliability and treatment selection.

METHOD

This forum synthesizes the limited empirical classification literature seeking to quantitatively distinguish ARFID from non-ARFID EDs or from PFD, and/or characterize within-ARFID heterogeneity.

RESULTS

To our knowledge, only five studies in clinical samples have used empirical classification methods to delineate ARFID from non-ARFID EDs and/or characterize within-ARFID heterogeneity; no studies have used such methods to delineate ARFID from PFD. Existing studies are mixed in determining how well ARFID can be distinguished from other EDs (particularly AN), but converge in identifying several potential ARFID subclasses (i.e., sensory sensitivity, low appetite, feared eating-related consequences, and subclass representing a combination of these) with some overlapping features.

DISCUSSION

The existing ARFID empirical classification literature should guide future ARFID classification research priorities (e.g., incorporating mechanistic variables as classification indicators, incorporating longitudinal variables as classification validators) to inform differences between ARFID and other disorders and between ARFID presentations. Dimensional approaches to conceptualizing, studying, and modeling psychopathology (namely, the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology [HiTOP] and the Research Domain Criteria [RDoC]) may offer useful insights.

A living experience proposal for the co-occurring diagnosis of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and other eating disorders

The eating and feeding disorder section of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5 Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) is organized by a diagnostic algorithm that limits the contemporaneous assignment of multiple eating disorder diagnoses. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a disturbance in food intake typically associated with lack of interest in food, food avoidance based on sensory characteristics, and/or fear of aversive consequences from eating. According to the DSM-5-TR, an ARFID diagnosis cannot be made when weight or shape disturbances are present, and ARFID cannot be co-diagnosed with other eating disorders characterized by these disturbances. However, emerging evidence from both clinical and lived experience contexts suggests that the co-occurrence of ARFID with multiple other types of eating disorders may be problematically invisibilized by this trumping scheme. The diagnostic criteria for ARFID can contribute to inappropriate diagnosis or exclusion from diagnosis due to excessive ambiguity and disqualification based on body image disturbance and other eating disorder pathology, even if unrelated to the food restriction or avoidance. This harmfully limits the ability of diagnostic codes to accurately describe an individual's eating disorder symptomatology, impacting access to specialized and appropriate eating disorder care. Therefore, revision of the DSM-5-TR criteria for ARFID and removal of limitations on the diagnosis of ARFID concurrent to other full-syndrome eating disorders stands to improve identification, diagnosis, and support of the full spectrum of ARFID presentations.

Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: Review and Recent Advances

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is an eating disorder recently codified in DSM-5 that affects individuals of all ages. A proliferation of ARFID research has emerged over the years, and this review provides a brief overview of the current understanding of ARFID epidemiology, symptoms, comorbid conditions, assessment, and treatment. The review highlights recent research updates regarding ARFID among adults, putative neurobiological mechanisms underlying ARFID, and new treatment trials. Findings from this review demonstrate that ARFID is as prevalent as other eating disorders, even among adults, and is associated with significant medical and psychiatric comorbid conditions. New, promising treatments for children, adolescents, and adults are in the early stages of development. Several assessments are now available to aid in the screening and diagnosis of ARFID and have demonstrated cross-cultural validity. Areas for future research and clinical guidance, including unresolved questions regarding ARFID categorization and differential diagnosis, are discussed.

Perceptual Dysfunction in Eating Disorders

Eating disorders (EDs) are characterized by abnormal responses to food and weight-related stimuli and are associated with significant distress, impairment, and poor outcomes. Because many of the cardinal symptoms of EDs involve disturbances in perception of one's body or abnormal affective or cognitive reactions to food intake and how that affects one's size, there has been longstanding interest in characterizing alterations in sensory perception among differing ED diagnostic groups. Within the current review, we aimed to critically assess the existing research on exteroceptive and interoceptive perception and how sensory perception may influence ED behavior. Overall, existing research is most consistent regarding alterations in taste, visual, tactile, and gastric-specific interoceptive processing in EDs, with emerging work indicating elevated respiratory and cardiovascular sensitivity. However, this work is far from conclusive, with most studies unable to speak to the precise etiology of observed perceptual differences in these domains and disentangle these effects from affective and cognitive processes observed within EDs. Further, existing knowledge regarding perceptual disturbances in EDs is limited by heterogeneity in methodology, lack of multimodal assessment protocols, and inconsistent attention to different ED diagnoses. We propose several new avenues for improving neurobiology-informed research on sensory processing to generate actionable knowledge that can inform the development of innovative interventions for these serious disorders.

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder prevalence is high in children with gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) prevalence in children with gastroparesis (Gp) and/or functional dyspepsia (FD) is unknown. We aimed to identify ARFID prevalence and trajectory over 2 months in children with Gp, FD, and healthy children (HC) using two screening questionnaires. We also explored the frequency of a positive ARFID screen between those with/without delayed gastric emptying or abnormal fundic accommodation.

METHODS

In this prospective longitudinal study conducted at an urban tertiary care hospital, patients ages 10-17 years with Gp or FD and age- and gender-matched HC completed two validated ARFID screening tools at baseline and 2-month follow-up: the Nine Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) and the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Interview-ARFID Questionnaire (PARDI-AR-Q). Gastric retention and fundic accommodation (for Gp and FD) were determined from gastric emptying scintigraphy.

KEY RESULTS

At baseline, the proportion of children screening positive for ARFID on the NIAS versus PARDI-AR-Q was Gp: 48.5% versus 63.6%, FD: 66.7% versus 65.2%, HC: 15.3% versus 9.7%, respectively; p < 0.0001 across groups. Of children who screened positive at baseline and participated in the follow-up, 71.9% and 53.3% were positive 2 months later (NIAS versus PARDI-AR-Q, respectively). A positive ARFID screen in Gp or FD was not related to the presence/absence of delayed gastric retention or abnormal fundic accommodation.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

ARFID detected from screening questionnaires is highly prevalent among children with Gp and FD and persists for at least 2 months in a substantial proportion of children. Children with these disorders should be screened for ARFID.

Moderating effect of self-esteem between perfectionism and avoidant restrictive food intake disorder among Lebanese adults

BACKGROUND

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) is a new diagnosis added to the DSM-5 characterized by pathological eating habits without body image disturbances. Previous findings demonstrated a general association between high levels of perfectionism and low levels of self-esteem in association with general eating disorders. However, research is scant when it comes to ARFID specifically. Subsequently, although self-esteem is seen to moderate the association between perfectionism and general eating disorders, this research study aims to explore the same moderation but with ARFID specifically.

METHODS

For this study, 515 Lebanese adults from the general Lebanese population were recruited from all over Lebanon, 60.1% of which were females. The Arabic version of the Big Three Perfectionism Scale- Short Form (BTPS-SF) was used to measure self-critical, rigid and narcissistic perfectionism; the Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder screen (NIAS) was used to score the ARFID variable; the Arabic-Single Item Self-Esteem (A-SISE) was the scale used to measure self-esteem.

RESULTS

Across the different perfectionism types, self-esteem was seen to moderate the association between narcissistic perfectionism and ARFID (Beta = - 0.22; p =.006). At low (Beta = 0.77; p <.001), moderate (Beta = 0.56; p <.001) and high (Beta = 0.36; p =.001) levels of self-esteem, higher narcissistic perfectionism was significantly associated with higher ARFID scores.

CONCLUSION

This study brought to light some crucial clinical implications that highlight the need for interventions that help in the enhancement of self-esteem in patients with high perfectionism and ARFID. This study suggests that clinicians and healthcare professionals should focus more on risk factors influencing the development and maintenance of ARFID-like symptoms.

Comprehensive Assessment of Nutrition and Dietary Influences in Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome-A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) are common in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorder (hEDS/HSD). Food is a known trigger for DGBI symptoms, which often leads to dietary alterations and, increasingly, nutrition support. We aimed to explore dietary behaviors and influencing factors in patients with hEDS/HSD.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, patients with hEDS/HSD were recruited from Ehlers-Danlos Support UK (nontertiary) and tertiary neurogastroenterology clinics to complete questionnaires characterizing the following: dietary behaviors, nutrition support, DGBI (Rome IV), gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety, depression, avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), mast cell activation syndrome, postural tachycardia syndrome (PoTS), and quality of life. We used stepwise logistic regression to ascertain which factors were associated with dietary behaviors and nutrition support.

RESULTS

Of 680 participants (95% female, median age 39 years), 62.1% altered their diet in the last year and 62.3% regularly skipped meals. Altered diet was associated with the following: reflux symptoms ( P < 0.001), functional dyspepsia ( P = 0.008), reported mast cell activation syndrome ( P < 0.001), and a positive screen for ARFID, specifically fear of eating and low interest ( P < 0.001). Approximately 31.7% of those who altered their diet required nutrition support. The strongest predictor of requiring nutrition support was a positive screen for ARFID, specifically fear of eating (OR: 4.97, 95% CI: 2.09-11.8, P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Altered diet is very common in the patients with hEDS/HSD we studied and influenced by functional dyspepsia, reflux symptoms, and ARFID. Those with ARFID have a 4-fold increased risk of requiring nutrition support, and therefore, it is paramount that psychological support is offered in parallel with dietary support in the management of DGBI in hEDS/HSD.

Co-existing mental and somatic conditions in Swedish children with the avoidant restrictive food intake disorder phenotype

Background

Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a feeding and eating disorder, characterized by limited variety and/or quantity of food intake impacting physical health and psychosocial functioning. Children with ARFID often present with a range of psychiatric and somatic symptoms, and therefore consult various pediatric subspecialties; large-scale studies mapping comorbidities are however lacking. To characterize health care needs of people with ARFID, we systematically investigated ARFID-related mental and somatic conditions in 616 children with ARFID and >30,000 children without ARFID.

Methods

In a Swedish twin cohort, we identified the ARFID phenotype in 6-12-year-old children based on parent-reports and register data. From >1,000 diagnostic ICD-codes, we specified mental and somatic conditions within/across ICD-chapters, number of distinct per-person diagnoses, and inpatient treatment days between birth and 18th birthday (90 outcomes). Hazard ratios (HR) and incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated.

Findings

Relative risks of neurodevelopmental, gastrointestinal, endocrine/metabolic, respiratory, neurological, and allergic disorders were substantially increased in ARFID (e.g., autism HR[CI95%]=9.7[7.5-12.5], intellectual disability 10.3[7.6-13.9], gastroesophageal reflux disease 6.7[4.6-9.9], pituitary conditions 5.6[2.7-11.3], chronic lower respiratory diseases 4.9[2.4-10.1], epilepsy 5.8[4.1-8.2]). ARFID was not associated with elevated risks of autoimmune illnesses and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Children with ARFID had a significantly higher number of distinct mental diagnoses (IRR[CI95%]=4.7[4.0-5.4]) and longer duration of hospitalizations (IRR[CI95%]=5.5[1.7-17.6]) compared with children without ARFID. Children with ARFID were diagnosed earlier with a mental condition than children without ARFID. No sex-specific differences emerged.

Interpretation

This study yields the broadest and most detailed evidence of co-existing mental and somatic conditions in the largest sample of children with ARFID to date. Findings suggest a complex pattern of health needs in youth with ARFID, underscoring the critical importance of attention to the illness across all pediatric specialties.

Funding

Fredrik and Ingrid Thurings Foundation, Mental Health Foundation.

Early weight gain as a predictor of weight restoration in avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder

BACKGROUND

Previous research has demonstrated that early weight gain in family-based treatment (FBT) is predictive of remission for adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN). However, no published data has addressed if early weight gain is also predictive of reaching weight restoration (i.e., 95% EBW) in patients with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). Furthermore, no studies have evaluated the performance of the statistical models used to predict weight restoration at the end of treatment. This study sought to examine whether early weight gain in ARFID is predictive of weight restoration at 20 weeks using ROC analysis. Additionally, this study assessed how accurately the model classified patients and what types of misclassifications occurred.

METHODS

Participants (n = 130, 57.7% cisgender female 70.0% white) received virtual outpatient FBT. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were used to predict successful weight restoration at end of treatment, using early weight gain as the predictor. Twenty weeks was considered as the end of treatment, to align with the definition of end of treatment in FBT clinical trials. ROC analyses demonstrated that gaining at least 6.2 pounds by week 5 of treatment was the strongest predictor of achieving 95% EBW at 20 weeks (AUC = 0.72 [0.63, 0.81]). ROC analyses misclassified 35% of patients; the most common misclassification was predicting that a patient would not achieve 95% EBW when they actually did (61.6%). A logistical regression model, which included the patients' %EBW at admission in addition to early weight gain as a predictor, outperformed the ROC analyses (AUC = 0.90 [0.85, 0.95]) and provided additional context by showing the probability that a patient would succeed.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, research demonstrates that early weight gain is a useful predictor of 95% EBW at 20 weeks of treatment for patients with ARFID who require weight restoration. Furthermore, results suggest that statistical models need to take into account additional information, such as %EBW at admission, along with early weight gain in order to more accurately predict which patients will reach weight restoration at week 20.

Subtypes of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in children and adolescents: a latent class analysis

Background

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) describes three primary avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) subtypes including sensory sensitivity, lack of interest in food or eating, and fear of aversive consequences. Studies exploring these subtypes have yielded varying results. We used latent class analysis (LCA) based on the psychopathology of ARFID in a sample of children and adolescents to empirically identify classes.

Methods

We carried out a surveillance study of ARFID in collaboration with the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit (BPSU) and the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Surveillance System (CAPSS) in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland from 1st of March 2021 to 31st of March 2022. Paediatricians and child and adolescent psychiatrists were contacted monthly to report newly diagnosed cases of ARFID electronically and complete a detailed clinical questionnaire. Cases aged 5-18 years were included. LCA was performed specifying 1-6 classes and likelihood-based tests for model selection. The Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Sample-Size Adjusted BIC were used to determine the most parsimonious model. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and χ2 tests were used to compare the characteristics of the identified classes. A multinomial logistic regression (MLR) was performed to investigate predicting factors for the latent classes.

Findings

We identified 319 children and adolescents with ARFID. LCA revealed four distinct classes which were labelled as Fear subtype, Lack of Interest subtype, Sensory subtype, and Combined subtype. The probability of being classified as these were 7.2% (n = 23), 25.1% (n = 80), 29.5% (n = 94) and 38.2% (n = 122), respectively. Age at diagnosis, sex, weight loss, distress associated with eating, and autism spectrum disorder diagnosis were identified as predictors of class membership.

Interpretation

LCA identified four different classes in a sample of children and adolescents with ARFID. The Combined Subtype, a mixed presentation was the most common. The other three classes resembled the subtypes described in the literature. Clinicians should be aware of these different presentations of ARFID as they may benefit from different clinical interventions.

Funding

This study was funded by the Former EMS Ltd (charity number 1098725, registered October 9th 2017).

Risk of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: predictive value of disease phenotype, disease activity and food literacy

BACKGROUND

Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) is a newly described eating disorder. Adequate levels of food literacy allow individuals to have adequate food choices. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of ARFID and the level of food literacy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and to analyse the correlation between ARFID and food literacy.

METHOD

This cross-sectional study screened for ARFID and assessed food literacy levels in patients with IBD attending four tertiary hospitals in China. ARFID risk was measured using the Nine Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen (NIAS). Food literacy was assessed using the Food Literacy Evaluation Questionnaire (Chinese version, FLEQ-Ch).The relationship between individual NIAS scores and food literacy variables was analysed to assess which food literacy aspect is positively or negatively associated with NIAS scores. Stepwise linear regression analysis was performed to identify the possible predictors of NIAS scores in patients with IBD.

RESULT

A total of 372 IBD subjects completed the NIAS and FLEQ-Ch. The overall mean NIAS scores for the IBD cohort was 28.16 ± 8.03 (p < 0.01), and of the 372 participants, 123 (32.5%) had positive ARFID risk scores (≥ 10 NIAS-picky eating, ≥ 9 NIAS-poor appetite, and ≥ 10 NIAS-fear of negative consequences).The NIAS scores were inversely associated with food literacy levels (β =  - 0.299; p < 0.01).Disease phenotype, disease activity, and food literacy in patients with IBD provided valuable predictive insights for avoiding positive outcomes in ARFID.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the risk of ARFID in the cohort of patients with IBD is associated with their inadequate food literacy levels. Therefore, this study supports the notion that patients with IBD should be assessed for food literacy regardless of whether they are currently diagnosed with ARFID. Specifically, for early identification of those at risk for ARFID in IBD, disease phenotype, disease activity, and food literacy should be routinely considered in clinical practice.The food literacy awareness of patients must be investigated and improved to predict the risk occurrence of ARFID and encourage healthy eating behaviour.

Oxytocin response to food intake in avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the response of anorexigenic oxytocin to food intake among adolescents and young adults with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), a restrictive eating disorder characterized by lack of interest in food or eating, sensory sensitivity to food, and/or fear of aversive consequences of eating, compared with healthy controls (HC).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

METHODS

A total of 109 participants (54 with ARFID spectrum and 55 HC) were instructed to eat a ∼400-kcal standardized mixed meal. We sampled serum oxytocin at fasting and at 30-, 60-, and 120-min postmeal. We tested the hypothesis that ARFID would show higher mean oxytocin levels across time points compared with HC using a mixed model ANOVA. We then used multivariate regression analysis to identify the impact of clinical characteristics (sex, age, and body mass index [BMI] percentile) on oxytocin levels in individuals with ARFID.

RESULTS

Participants with ARFID exhibited greater mean oxytocin levels at all time points compared with HC, and these differences remained significant even after controlling for sex and BMI percentile (P = .004). Clinical variables (sex, age, and BMI percentile) did not show any impact on fasting and postprandial oxytocin levels among individuals with ARFID.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistently high oxytocin levels might be involved in low appetite and sensory aversions to food, contributing to food avoidance in individuals with ARFID.

The Intersection of Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction With Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder

High rates of overlap exist between disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) and eating disorders, for which common interventions conceptually conflict. There is particularly increasing recognition of eating disorders not centered on shape/weight concerns, specifically avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in gastroenterology treatment settings. The significant comorbidity between DGBI and ARFID highlights its importance, with 13% to 40% of DGBI patients meeting full criteria for or having clinically significant symptoms of ARFID. Notably, exclusion diets may put some patients at risk for developing ARFID and continued food avoidance may perpetuate preexisting ARFID symptoms. In this review, we introduce the provider and researcher to ARFID and describe the possible risk and maintenance pathways between ARFID and DGBI. As DGBI treatment recommendations may put some patients at risk for developing ARFID, we offer recommendations for practical treatment management including evidence-based diet treatments, treatment risk counseling, and routine diet monitoring. When implemented thoughtfully, DGBI and ARFID treatments can be complementary rather than conflicting.

What do we know about the epidemiology of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in children and adolescents? A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) was a new diagnosis in DSM-5. This systematic review explores what is known to date about the epidemiology of ARFID in children and adolescents.

METHOD

Embase, Medline and PsycInfo were used to identify studies meeting inclusion criteria. PRISMA guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Thirty studies met inclusion criteria, with most coming from specialised eating disorder services where prevalence rates were 5%-22.5%. Three studies from specialist feeding clinics showed the highest prevalence rates, ranging from 32% to 64%. Studies from non-clinical samples reported ARFID prevalence estimates ranging from 0.3% to 15.5%. One study, using national surveillance methodology, reported the incidence of ARFID in children and adolescents reaching clinical care to be 2.02 per 100,000 patients. Psychiatric comorbidity was common, especially anxiety disorders (9.1%-72%) and autism spectrum disorder (8.2%-54.75%).

CONCLUSION

The current literature on the epidemiology of ARFID in children and adolescents is limited. Studies are heterogeneous with regard to setting and sample characteristics, with a wide range of prevalence estimates. Further studies, especially using surveillance methodology, will help to better understand the nature of this disorder and estimate clinical service needs.

A 12-Year-Old Girl with Weight Loss

A 12-Year-Old Girl with Weight LossThis report examines a case of chronic weight loss, anxiety, abdominal pain, and nausea in an adolescent girl. With directed questioning, physical examination, and testing, an illness script for the presentation emerges; the differential is refined until a final diagnosis is made.

Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) as a psychological intervention in the treatment of ARFID for children and young people

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) is a condition characterised by a disturbance in eating behaviour that leads to a significant negative impact on physical, social and nutritional health. The diagnosis of ARFID relies on a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary assessment to understand the individual’s history, physical, social and mental health risk, and any co-occurring mental health difficulties. Consensus guidance suggests that psychological treatment, alongside medical and dietetic input is delivered with consideration of any appropriate adaptions to accommodate developmental stage and/or common co-occurring presentations. This paper has been authored by clinicians working in an out-patient setting for children and adolescents with ARFID, and focuses on the presentation and assessment of ARFID and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) approaches that can help children, young people and their families. After an introductory section, the paper is split into four sections: assessment of ARFID; drivers of avoidant restrictive eating behaviour; multi-disciplinary formulation and intervention planning; and treatment. The treatment section provides an overview of the available research on CBT for ARFID, and a brief summary of the broader evidence base for CBT in children and young people with anxiety. Following a review of the evidence base, three case descriptions are provided to illustrate the clinical application of CBT where fear-based avoidance is the main driver. The paper concludes with practice points for clinicians to take forward when working with children and young people with ARFID.

Key learning aims

(1)

Identification and Management of Eating Disorders (including ARFID) in GI Patients

Eating disorders are characterized by cognitions (eg, fear of gastrointestinal symptoms around eating, overvaluation of body shape/weight) and behaviors (eg, dietary restriction, binge eating) associated with medical (eg, weight loss), and/or psychosocial impairments (eg, high distress around eating). With growing evidence for bidirectional relationships between eating disorders and gastrointestinal disorders, gastroenterology providers' awareness of historical, concurrent, and potential risk for eating disorders is imperative. In this conceptual review, we highlight risk and maintenance pathways in the eating disorder-gastrointestinal disorder intersection, delineate different types of eating disorders, and provide recommendations for the gastroenterology provider in assessing and preventing eating disorder symptoms..

Pediatric Avoidant-Restrictive Food Intake Disorder and gastrointestinal-related Somatic Symptom Disorders: Overlap in clinical presentation

Certain presentations of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) and Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders (SSRDs) have conceptual overlap, namely, distress and impairment related to a physical symptom. This study compared characteristics of pediatric patients diagnosed with ARFID to those with gastrointestinal (GI)-related SSRD. A 5-year retrospective chart review at a tertiary care pediatric hospital comparing assessment data of patients with a diagnosis of ARFID (n = 62; 69% girls, M_age = 14.08 years) or a GI-related SSRD (n = 37; 68% girls, M_age = 14.25 years). Patients diagnosed with ARFID had a significantly lower percentage of median BMI than those with GI-related SSRD. Patients diagnosed with ARFID were most often assessed in the Eating Disorders Program, whereas patients diagnosed with an SSRD were most often assessed by Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. Groups did not differ on demographics, psychiatric diagnoses, illness duration, or pre-assessment services/medications. GI symptoms were common across groups. Patients diagnosed with an SSRD had more co-occurring medical diagnoses. A subset (16%) of patients reported symptoms consistent with both diagnoses. Overlap is observed in the clinical presentation of pediatric patients diagnosed with ARFID or GI-related SSRD. Some group differences emerged, including anthropometric measurements and co-occurring medical conditions. Findings may inform diagnostic classification and treatment approach.