Palliative key aspects are of importance for symptom relief during the last week of life in patients with heart failure

Symptom assessment in the dying: family members versus healthcare professionals

OBJECTIVES

Symptom management and support of the family members (FMs) are considered essential aspects of palliative care. During end of life, patients are often not able to self-report symptoms. There is little knowledge in the literature of how healthcare professionals (HCPs) assess symptoms compared with FMs. The objective was to compare the assessment of symptoms and symptom relief during the final week of life between what was reported by FMs and what was reported by HCPs.

METHODS

Data from the Swedish Register of Palliative Care from 2021 and 2022 were used to compare congruity of the assessments by the FMs and by HCPs regarding occurrence and relief of three symptoms (pain, anxiety and confusion), using Cohen's kappa.

RESULTS

A total of 1131 patients were included. The agreement between FMs and HCPs was poor for occurrence of pain and confusion (kappa 0.25 and 0.16), but fair for occurrence of anxiety (kappa 0.30). When agreeing on a symptom being present, agreement on relief of that symptom was poor (kappa 0.04 for pain, 0.10 for anxiety and 0.01 for confusion). The trend was that HCPs more often rated occurrence of pain and anxiety, less often occurrence of confusion and more often complete symptom relief compared with the FMs.

CONCLUSIONS

The views of FMs and HCPs of the patients' symptoms differ in the end-of-life context, but both report important information and their symptom assessments should be considered both together and individually. More communication between HCPs and FMs could probably bridge some of these differences.

Effects of a home-based palliative heart failure program on quality of life among the elderly: a clinical trial study

INTRODUCTION

One of the frequent issues that lowers elderly people's quality of life is chronic heart failure, a progressive and life-limiting disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of home-based palliative care (HBPC) on the quality of life of elderly patients with heart failure who received discharge orders from hospitals affiliated with Kerman University of Medical Sciences in 2022.

METHODS

One hundred heart failure patients were divided into two intervention and control groups for this randomized clinical trial study. The patients were then given the pre-test questionnaires, such as the demographic questionnaire and the Quality of Life Index (QLI) by Ferrans and Powers. The intervention group was given the home care plan. To measure the quality of life one month after the intervention, the quality of life questionnaire was lastly filled out by both groups following the last care session. Software called SPSS 22 was used to enter and analyze the patient data.

RESULTS

The mean age for the elderly in the intervention and in the control groups were 69.46 ± 11.61 and 66.14 ± 12.09 years, respectively. The palliative care program at home made a statistically significant difference in the quality of life and all of its components in the elderly with heart failure in the intervention group immediately after the intervention and one month after the intervention compared to before (P < 0.001). As a result, its scores improved compared to the stage before the intervention. Additionally, a significant difference between the quality of life score and all of its components between the intervention's immediate aftermath and one month later was noted (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Home-based palliative care has a positive effect on the quality of life for elderly people who have heart failure, making it a worthwhile intervention to enhance their quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATIONS

(IRCT20211213053389N1). Date of registration: (19/02/2022).

Specialized Palliative Care for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure at End of Life: Transfers, Emergency Department Visits, and Hospital Deaths

Objective: Specialized palliative care (SPC) may contribute to improved quality of life in patients with life-limiting chronic heart failure (CHF). This study examined SPC and possible differences in the care process regarding emergency department (ED) visits, transfers, and place of death for severely ill patients with CHF. Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational registry study used the health care consumption data from the Stockholm Regional Council. Logistic regression analyses of age, sex, palliative care, comorbidities, and socioeconomic status were performed. Results: Of the 4322 individuals who died of heart failure between 2015 and 2019 and did not reside in a nursing home, 24% received SPC. Receiving SPC was associated with a lower odds ratio (OR) of ED visits (OR 0.24, p < 0.0001), unplanned transfers (OR 0.39, p < 0.0001), and emergency hospital as a place of death (OR 0.10, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, a better socioeconomic situation, younger age, and fewer comorbidities were associated with a lower OR of ED visits and transfers (p < 0.0001 to p = 0.013 in different comparisons). Multiple comorbidities (p < 0.0002) and younger age (p < 0.0001) were associated with a higher OR of emergency hospitals as a place of death. Conclusion: Approximately one-quarter of patients who died of heart failure received SPC. Receipt of SPC was associated with a significantly reduced number of ED visits, transfers between health care services, and risk of dying in emergency hospitals.

State of the Science: The Relevance of Symptoms in Cardiovascular Disease and Research: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Symptoms of cardiovascular disease drive health care use and are a major contributor to quality of life. Symptoms are of fundamental significance not only to the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease and appraisal of response to medical therapy but also directly to patients' daily lives. The primary purpose of this scientific statement is to present the state of the science and relevance of symptoms associated with cardiovascular disease. Symptoms as patient-reported outcomes are reviewed in terms of the genesis, manifestation, and similarities or differences between diagnoses. Specifically, symptoms associated with acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, valvular disorders, stroke, rhythm disorders, and peripheral vascular disease are reviewed. Secondary aims include (1) describing symptom measurement methods in research and application in clinical practice and (2) describing the importance of cardiovascular disease symptoms in terms of clinical events and other patient-reported outcomes as applicable.

End-of-Life Care for End-stage Heart Failure Patients

Although recent heart failure (HF) guidelines highlight integrative palliative care, including end-of-life (EOL), appropriate discussing EOL issues can be challenging due to possibility of unexpected deterioration throughout HF trajectory. Open communication and discussions with multidisciplinary team are important for setting patient and family expectations and establishing mutually agreed goals of care based firmly on the patient’s ‘human dignity’ and ‘right to self-determination.’ Especially when quality-of-life outweighs expanding quantity-of-life, transition to EOL care should be considered. Advanced care planning including resuscitation, device deactivation, site for last days, and bereavement support should focus on ensuring a good death, and be reviewed regularly.

Efforts to improve end-of-life (EOL) care have generally been focused on cancer patients, but high-quality EOL care is also important for patients with other serious medical illnesses including heart failure (HF). Recent HF guidelines offer more clinical considerations for palliative care including EOL care than ever before. Because HF patients can experience rapid, unexpected clinical deterioration or sudden death throughout the disease trajectory, choosing an appropriate time to discuss issues such as advance directives or hospice can be challenging in real clinical situations. Therefore, EOL issues should be discussed early. Conversations are important for understanding patient and family expectations and developing mutually agreed goals of care. In particular, high-quality communication with patient and family through a multidisciplinary team is necessary to define patient-centered goals of care and establish treatment based on goals. Control of symptoms such as dyspnea, pain, anxiety/depression, fatigue, nausea, anorexia, and altered mental status throughout the dying process is an important issue that is often overlooked. When quality-of-life outweighs expanding quantity-of-life, the transition to EOL care should be considered. Advanced care planning including resuscitation (i.e., do-not resuscitate order), device deactivation, site for last days and bereavement support for the family should focus on ensuring a good death and be reviewed regularly. It is essential to ensure that treatment for all HF patients incorporates discussions about the overall goals of care and individual patient preferences at both the EOL and sudden changes in health status. In this review, we focus on EOL care for end-stage HF patients.

Integration of primary palliative care into geriatric care from the Indian perspective

The rising trend in the ageing population alongside social, cultural, and economic changes poses a major threat to the health care system in the country. Elderly population have dynamic and complex health care needs, are debilitated by the progressive chronic life-threatening diseases, and live a compromised quality of life. Palliative care, with its multifaceted approach, can provide respite to the elderly population. A decentralized approach in which palliative care is provided by the local community will ensure seamless continuity of care and care at an affordable cost. General practitioners or family physicians play a vital role in delivering primary palliative care to the elderly population in the community. An integrating primary palliative-geriatric care model will ensure that care is provided in alignment with the patients' and their families' wishes along the trajectory of the life-threatening illness and at the patients' preferred place. However, delivering primary palliative care in the community can be riddled with challenges at various levels, such as identification of patients in need of palliative care, interpersonal communication, addressing patients' and caregivers' needs, clarity in roles and responsibilities between general practitioner and family physicians and specialist palliative care teams, coordination of services with specialists, and lack of standard guidelines for palliative care referral. Various geriatric-palliative care models have been tested over the years, such as delivering palliative and end-of-life care for disease-specific conditions at specified care settings (home or hospice) and provision of care by different specialist palliative care teams and general practitioners or family physicians. Akin to the aforementioned models, the National Health Program in the country envisages to strengthen the integration of geriatric and palliative care. The integrated geriatric-palliative care model will ensure continuity of care, equitable distribution of service, impeccable inter-sectoral collaboration and care at an affordable cost.

Public Health Perspective of Primary Palliative Care: A Review through the Lenses of General Practitioners

The rising trend of chronic life-threatening illnesses is accompanied by an exponential increase in serious health-related suffering. Palliative care is known to ameliorate physical and psychosocial suffering and restore quality of life. However, the contemporary challenges of palliative care delivery, such as changing demographics, social isolation, inequity in service delivery, and professionalisation of dying, have prompted many to adopt a public health approach to palliative care delivery. A more decentralised approach in which palliative care is integrated into primary care will ensure that the care is available locally to those who need it and at a cost that they can afford. General practitioners (GPs) play a pivotal role in providing primary palliative care in the community. They ensure that care is provided in alignment with patients’ and their families’ wishes along the trajectory of the life-threatening illness and at the patient’s preferred place. GPs use an interdisciplinary approach by collaborating with specialist palliative care teams and other healthcare professionals. However, they face challenges in providing end-of-life care in the community, which include identification of patients in need of palliative care, interpersonal communication, addressing patients’ and caregivers’ needs, clarity in roles and responsibilities between GPs and specialist palliative care teams, coordination of service with specialists and lack of confidence in providing palliative care in view of deficiencies in knowledge and skills in palliative care. Multiple training formats and learning styles for GPs in end-of-life care have been explored across studies. The research has yielded mixed results in terms of physician performance and patient outcomes. This calls for more research on GPs’ views on end-of-life care learning preferences, as this might inform policy and practice and facilitate future training programs in end-of-life care.

Perceived symptoms as the primary indicators for 30-day heart failure readmission

Background

To identify 30-day rehospitalizations in patients discharged with heart failure (HF) based on clinical indications, physiologic measures and symptoms.

Methods

Fifty-six patients with heart failure participated. After discharge to home, clinical indicators of dyspnea, fatigue, orthopnea, dyspnea with exertion, daily weight, edema, heart rate, blood pressure, mental condition, medication adherence, and overall well-being were reported by participants daily for up to 30 days.

Results

Joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event approach was applied to assess the association of readmission with longitudinal measurements. There was no association between demographic, physiological, or laboratory variables and re-hospitalization within 30 days post discharge. Perceptions of dyspnea (p = .012) and feeling unwell (p < .001) were associated with rehospitalization. Patients struggling to breath were 10.7 times more likely to be readmitted than those not struggling to breath.

Conclusion

Perceived measures, particularly dyspnea and feeling unwell were more important factors than demographic, physiological, or laboratory parameters in predicting 30-day rehospitalizations in this racially diverse cohort. The symptomatic experience of heart failure is an important indicator of rehospitalization.

Advanced heart failure: guideline-directed medical therapy, diuretics, inotropes, and palliative care

Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of mortality, hospitalizations, and reduced quality of life and a major burden for the healthcare system. The number of patients that progress to an advanced stage of HF is growing. Only a limited proportion of these patients can undergo heart transplantation or mechanical circulatory support. The purpose of this review is to summarize medical management of patients with advanced HF. First, evidence-based oral treatment must be implemented although it is often not tolerated. New therapeutic options may soon become possible for these patients. The second goal is to lessen the symptomatic burden through both decongestion and haemodynamic improvement. Some new treatments acting on cardiac function may fulfil both these needs. Inotropic agents acting through an increase in intracellular calcium have often increased risk of death. However, in the recent Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac Outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC-HF) trial, omecamtiv mecarbil was safe and effective in the reduction of the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or HF event compared with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.99; P = 0.03) and its effects were larger in those patients with more severe left ventricular dysfunction. Patients with severe HF who received omecamtiv mecarbil experienced a significant treatment benefit, whereas patients without severe HF did not (P = 0.005 for interaction). Lastly, clinicians should take care of the end of life with an appropriate multidisciplinary approach. Medical treatment of advanced HF therefore remains a major challenge and a wide open area for further research.

Sinais e sintomas de pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca em cuidados paliativos: revisão de escopo

RESUMO Objetivo Mapear a produção de conhecimento acerca dos sinais e sintomas de pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca em cuidados paliativos. Método Revisão de escopo conduzida de acordo com a metodologia JBI e com a redação guiada pelo Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist. A busca foi realizada em setembro de 2021 por dois revisores independentes nas bases de dados referenciais e em portais de informação e de literatura cinzenta, utilizando majoritariamente os descritores “heart failure”, “signs and symptoms” e “palliative care”, com o operador booleano “and”, sem recorte temporal. Resultados Foram incluídos 34 artigos publicados entre 2001 e 2021, provenientes de revistas nacionais e internacionais, sendo 21 publicados nos Estados Unidos da América. Por meio desses artigos, foi possível mapear 93 sinais e sintomas, sendo que os mais frequentes foram dor, dispneia, fadiga, náusea e depressão. Conclusão Implicações para a prática esta revisão de escopo produziu um mapa da produção científica sobre os sinais e sintomas de insuficiência cardíaca em cuidados paliativos. O conhecimento dos sinais e sintomas auxilia os profissionais da saúde no desenvolvimento de técnicas e tecnologias para avaliar a severidade da insuficiência cardíaca, planejar intervenções paliativas e avaliar os seus resultados.

Palliative key aspects are of importance for symptom relief during the last week of life in patients with heart failure

AIMS

This study aimed to describe symptom prevalence of pain, shortness of breath, anxiety, and nausea and to identify factors associated with symptom relief in patients with heart failure during their last week of life.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This nationwide study used data from the Swedish Register of Palliative Care and the Swedish Causes of Death Certificate Register. The sample included 4215 patients with heart failure as the underlying cause of death. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to analyse data. Pain was the most prevalent symptom (64.0%), followed by anxiety (45.1%), shortness of breath (28.8%), and nausea (11.4%). Pain was the most often totally relieved (77.5%), followed by anxiety (68.4%), nausea (54.7%), and shortness of breath (37.1%). Key aspects of palliative care such as documented palliative care in the patient record, individual medication prescriptions by injection, symptom assessment with validated scales, documented end-of-life discussions with patients and/or family members, and external consultation were significantly associated with symptom relief. Relief of pain, shortness of breath, anxiety, and nausea were significantly better managed in nursing homes and hospice/inpatient palliative care compared with care in hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that key aspects of palliative care during the last week of life are significantly associated with symptom relief. Increased access to palliative care could provide a way to improve care during the last week of life for patients with heart failure. Home-based settings provided more symptom relief than hospitals, which may indicate that the latter focuses on treatments and saving lives rather than promoting life before death.